Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cancer Cell International logoLink to Cancer Cell International
. 2005 Jul 7;5:20. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-5-20

Changes in P-glycoprotein activity are mediated by the growth of a tumour cell line as multicellular spheroids

Ponce de León Valeria 1, Barrera-Rodríguez Raúl 1,✉
PMCID: PMC1185553  PMID: 16001980

Abstract

Background

Expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), the multidrug resistance (MDR) 1 gene product, can lead to multidrug resistance in tumours. However, the physiological role of P-gp in tumours growing as multicellular spheroids is not well understood. Recent evidence suggests that P-gp activity may be modulated by cellular components such as membrane proteins, membrane-anchoring proteins or membrane-lipid composition. Since, multicellular spheroids studies have evidenced alterations in numerous cellular components, including those related to the plasma membrane function, result plausible that some of these changes might modulate P-gp function and be responsible for the acquisition of multicellular drug resistance. In the present study, we asked if a human lung cancer cell line (INER-51) grown as multicellular spheroids can modify the P-gp activity to decrease the levels of doxorubicin (DXR) retained and increase their drug resistance.

Results

Our results showed that INER-51 spheroids retain 3-folds lower doxorubicin than the same cells as monolayers however; differences in retention were not observed when the P-gp substrate Rho-123 was used. Interestingly, neither the use of the P-gp-modulating agent cyclosporin-A (Cs-A) nor a decrease in ATP-pools were able to increase DXR retention in the multicellular spheroids. Only the lack of P-gp expression throughout the pharmacological selection of a P-gp negative (P-gpneg) mutant clone (PSC-1) derived from INER-51 cells, allow increase of DXR retention in spheroids.

Conclusion

Thus, multicellular arrangement appears to alter the P-gp activity to maintain lower levels of DXR. However, the non expression of P-gp by cells forming multicellular spheroids has only a minor impact in the resistance to chemotherapeutic agents.

Keywords: P-Glycoprotein, Multicellular spheroids, Multicellular drug resistance, NSCLC

Background

Multidrug resistance to chemotherapy is one of the biggest problems in the treatment of cancer. Currently, the best understood mechanism of multidrug resistance (MDR) is associated with the overexpression of protein efflux-pump known as P-glycoprotein (P-gp), but other non-Ppg mechanisms are also involved (i.e. MRP1, topoisomerases, glutathione-S transferases, etc). The P-gp is the protein product of the MDR-1 gene and is expressed as a transmembranal protein (Mr 170 000) capable of decreasing the intracellular concentration of a broad range of cytotoxic agents in an energy-dependant mediated efflux [1,2]. Overexpression of P-gp in human cell lines confers resistance to many of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents used clinically in chemotherapy, including anthracyclines (e.g., doxorubicin (DXR)), Vinca alkaloids (e.g., vincristine), epipodophyllotoxins (e.g., etoposide), actinomycin D, paclitaxel, as well as many others non-chemotherapeutic agents like Rhodamine-123 and ethidium bromide [3]. Although the more accepted model is that the P-gp by itself extrude chemotherapeutic agents out of the cells, more recent studies suggest that P-gp activity may be modulated by cellular components such as membrane proteins, membrane-anchoring proteins or the composition of lipids themselves [4-7].

Since the first studies by Sutherland et al in 1979 [8], it was shown that tumour cells growing as multicellular spheroids resembles many of the behaviours found in solid tumours, including multicellular resistance (MCR) [9,10]. Using the model of multicellular spheroids, several authors have shown that P-gp, is more efficient to conferring resistance in cells cultivated as spheroids as compared to cells cultivated as monolayers [11-13]. From these observations, one question arises: Can tumour cells modulate its P-gp activity as a direct consequence of the environmental condition where grown? To address this question, we studied an NSCLC cell line named INER-51 that showed a P-gp-mediated resistance to DXR in the spheroid model. In early studies with INER-51 cells, we found that the formation of multicellular spheroids does not show any increase in mRNA for MDR-1 gene or in a differential P-gp expression in the specific areas of the spherule.

Results

Doxorubicin and Rhodamine-123 retention in spheroids

It is well known that multicellular spheroids are more resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs than the same cell cultures as monolayers [11,12]. With the aim to evaluate differences in P-gp activity in multicellular spheroids with respect to monolayers, two P-gp substrates were used (DXR and Rho-123). Both compounds were chosen, because they are good P-gp substrates with an autofluorescence capacity. Our results showed that in monolayers the amount of DXR retained in the cells was in direct proportion to the drug added to the medium (Figure 1). In contrast, multicellular spheroids showed a lower capacity for DXR retention (3-fold lower) than monolayers. Interestingly, this poor retention was not observed when Rho-123 was used as P-gp substrate because the Rho-123 levels retained were equal in both types of cultures (box insert in Figure 1a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Dose-dependence of doxorubicin-retention in INER-51 cells. (a) Tumour cells growth as monolayers (filled circles) or multicellular spheroids (open circles) were incubated with increased concentrations of DXR or Rho-123 (Insert box) for 30 min and then intracellular fluorescence was determinated by spectrofluormetry. b) Time-course of DXR efflux in INER-51 cells. Monolayers (filled circles) and a multicellular spheroids (open circles) were previously loaded with 30 μM of DXR for 30 min and afterwards the remaining DXR was quantitated in several intervals of time. Each point represents the mean of at least 3 experiments and error bars are the standard error of the mean.

Since the drug-retention is a dynamic process that involves drug uptake (simple diffusion) as well as drug linkage (diffusion vs. expulsion mediated for an active mechanism), we tried to determine whether a more efficient P-gp-dependent drug removal was responsible for allowing lower intracellular DXR concentrations. Thus, drug-removal in monolayers previously loaded with 30 μM of DXR during 30 min showed a first order decay reaction with a half-time of drug concentration at the first 5 minutes interval that indicated the presence of an active transport mechanism (Figure 1b). However, for multicellular spheroids the presence of active transport was not evident since its was not possible to load the cells with sufficient amounts of DXR to determine the efflux values. A common observation in these experiments was that a constant amount of DXR was retained for a longer period of time (45 minutes) in cells grown as monolayers. A possible explanation could be from the presence of positively charged-DXR, which stores in acidic vesicles as chromaffin granules and lysosomes [20,21].

Circumvention of DXR retention with P-pg reversal agents

With the aim to determine how much the P-gp influences the levels of DXR retained, the modulator agent Cs-A was employed. As shown in the Figure 2, the incubation of monolayers with 5 μM of Cs-A efficiently enhances (2-fold) the intracellular DXR fluorescence in direct relation to reversal agent concentration. Surprisingly, the P-gp-modulation activity of Cs-A was not evident in multicellular spheroids because no effect in the intracellular DXR retention could be seen. Also, other reversal agents, like SDZ PSC 833 and verapamil were not able to increase DXR retention, neither in monolayers nor in multicellular spheroids (data not shown).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Circumvention of doxorubicin-retention by cyclosporin-A (Cs-A). INER-51 cells growth as monolayers (filled circles) or multicellular spheroids (open circles) were treated with increase concentrations of Cs-A for 1 hour previous to being loaded with 30 μM of DXR for 30 min in presence of reversal agent. Doxorubicin retained was determinate by spectrofluormetry. Each point represents the mean of at least 3 experiments and the error bars are the standard error of the mean.

Effect of ATP-depletion in DXR retention

P-gp is a protein that belongs to the ABC binding cassette protein, for which efficient drug efflux needs ATP hydrolysis. Thus, with the propose to achieve more information about the P-gp function, we decided to inhibit the P-gp activity through depletion of ATP-pools. Three metabolic poisons were used to be sure of complete ATP-depletion in multicellular spheroids. Figure 3 shows that ATP-depletion did induce a 1.5-fold increase of DXR retention in cells maintained as monolayers but none effect was again seen when in ATP-depleted multicellular spheroids.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effect of ATP-depletion in doxorubicin-retention. INER-51 cells as monolayers or multicellular spheroids were pre-incubated (open symbols) or not (filled symbols) with 1 mM sodium-cyanide, 10 mM sodium-fluoride, 10 mM sodium azide before the addition of increased DXR concentrations. The intracellular DXR-fluorescence was evaluated by spectrofluormetry. Each point represents the mean of at least 3 experiments and the error bars are the standard error of the mean. The Student's t-test for paired data was performed to identify changes in DXR retention. The results were considered to be significant when p < 0.05. NS: no significant.

Achieving the PSC-1 mutant clone non-expressing P-gp

With no possibility of obtaining irrefutable evidence of P-gp modulation from multicellular spheroids, we decided to eliminate the P-gp expression from the lung cancer line. Therefore, through the co-selection of the parental cell line INER-51 with 5 μM of DXR and 5 μM of SDZ PSC 833, we were able to obtain one mutant cell clone that did not express P-gp, which was named PSC-1 line (Figure 4a). In vitro RT-PCR analysis of other MDR-related genes did not show qualitative differences between parent and mutant cells (Figure 4b). The amplification experiments showed that both cells lines express with approximately with the same intensity transcripts for topoisomerase I, topoisomerase IIα and topoisomerase IIβ but neither of them expressed the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) or glutathione-S transferase-μ.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

RT-PCR analysis of the levels of expression for MDR genes in the parental cell line INER-51 as well as the PSC-1 cell clone. a) Amplification of MDR-1 gene visualized by ethidium bromide (left) or autoradiagraph (middle). The expression of G3PDH gene was used as a constitutive control for the integrity of the RNA molecules. b) Amplification by RT-PCR of other non-MDR-1 genes related to MDR phenotype. As control (CTL) of gene expression, the next cell lines and tissues were used: INER-37 cell line for MRP1 and GST-μ; A427 cell line for MDR-1; HeLa cell line for topoisomerase I, topoisomerase IIα and topoisomerase IIβ; finally, placental tissue was used as a control of BCRP expression.

DXR retention and drug cytotoxicity in PSC-1 cells

The similarities between INER-51 cells (P-gppos) and PSC-1 cells (P-gpneg), allowed us the possibility to evaluate whether or not the lower DXR-retention levels were mediated by a positively modulated P-gp-mechanism. The incubation of PSC-1 spheroids with increasing DXR concentrations showed a significative increase in the drug retention (1.8-fold) in comparison to INER-51 spheroids and was only 1.6-fold lower than PSC-1 growth as monolayers (Figure 5). When Rho-123 was assayed, an increase in the retention of the dye relative to the parental line INER-51 as monolayers was evident. In PSC-1 spheroids, the levels of Rho-123 retention were similar in both INER-51 monolayers and multicellular spheroids (box insert in Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Comparative doxorubicin retention of PSC-1 cells and INER-51 cells. PSC-1 tumour cells growth as monolayers (filled circles) or multicellular spheroids (filled triangles) and INER-51 monolayers (open circles) or multicellular spheroids (open triangles) were incubated with increased concentrations of DXR (as in Figure 1) and then intracellular fluorescence was determined by spectrofluormetry. Insert box. Rhodamine-123-retention in PSC-1 cell growth as monolayers or multicellular spheroids.

Several techniques have been used to evaluate the MCR in multicellular spheroids. Since in previous experiments we were unable to successfully disaggregate multicellular spheroids through trypsin-based protocols, we decided to evaluate the MCR using the MTT assay (which as been previously evaluated by Furukawa et al[17]. Interestingly, this assay showed that the increase in DXR retention had only a minor impact in the MCR. Thus, PSC-1 spheroids were able to maintain their resistance to DXR or etoposide as the parental INER-51 cells (Figure 6a,b) with only minor changes in the IC50 values (Table 1). Only when PCS-1 cells were assayed against the cytotoxic effect of methotrexate (which use another detoxification via previous to P-gp), differences between INER-51 cells and PSC-1 cells could be seen (Figure 6c).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Cytotoxicity of doxorubicin (a), etoposide (b) and methotrexate (c) in monolayers or multicellular spheroids from PSC-1 (P-gpneg) clone cells in comparison to the parental INER-51 cell line. Cytotoxicity was measurement by the MTT colorimetric assay and expressed as percent growth inhibition in comparison with the untreated tumour cells. Each point represents the mean of at least 3 independent experiments and error bars are the standard error of the mean

Table 1.

Indices of cytotoxicity (IC50) to several cancer drugs founded in multicellular spheroids and monolayer.

Drug Monolayers IC50 (μM) Multicell. spheroids IC50 (μM)
INER-51 PCS-1 RR INER-51 PCS-1 RR
Doxorubicin 6.2 9.2 1.4 15 9.8 0.6
Etoposide 2.2 4.1 1.8 >50 >50 ----
Methotrexate 0.8 2.8 3.5 >50 >50 ----
Open in a new tab

Drug exposition was continuous for 72 hours and drug cytotoxicity was performed by MTT assay. IC50: Fifty percent of the decrease in the survival rate. RR: The value of relative resistance of INER-51 cells vs PSC-1 cells as monolayers or multicellular spheroids.

Discussion

It is well known that the three-dimensional arrangement evoke deeper structural changes in the cells to maintain the integrity of the multicellular structure, some of which include: a) the expression of proteins of ECM [22]; b) membrane protein anchoring [23,24]; c) heat shock proteins [25] and d) adhesion proteins as well as changes in lipid membrane composition and hypoxia [26-29]. Another phenomenon frequently observed in tumour cells growing as multicellular spheroids is the acquisition of MCR. In spheroids cultures as well in monolayer systems one of the major mechanisms to confer resistance is shown by the expression of P-gp. However, some evidence suggests that to confer MCR, the P-gp also seems to work more efficiently [11,12]. Recent data suggests that P-gp activity can be modulated through the interaction with diverse cellular components, some of which are also altered when cells are multicellular spheroids [4-7,11,12]. Thus, it would be interesting to know if to acquire MCR, tumour cells spheroids can modulate its P-gp activity.

Our findings suggest that a more efficient P-gp-mediated efflux seems to be responsible for maintaining lower levels of DXR in INER-51 spheroids than cells in monolayer cultures. However, this P-gp mediated drug efflux did not seem to operate under the same conditions with others substrates, because when the lipophilic cation Rho-123 was used, the levels of retention were similar and independent of the culture conditions.

Under the spheroid condition, P-gp appears to obey different regulatory mechanisms since neither Cs-A treatment nor ATP-depletion were able to increase the levels of DXR into the spherules. Other non-P-gp mediated mechanisms also appear to be operating to maintain lower DXR levels in the multicellular spheroids, because the lack of P-gp expression did not reach levels of DXR comparable to the monolayer's cultures and had only a minor impact in the acquisition of MCR to chemotherapeutic agents, including DXR.

Some evidences has shown that the membrane-cell composition can modulate the transbilayer movement rate of MDR-type drugs across the membrane and consequently affects the "competition" between the active P-gp-mediated drug efflux and the passive drug uptake: i.e. retention [30]. Particularly, DXR has shown to have a lower rate of penetration through membranes due to its specific interactions with cardiolipin [31,32]. Since membrane changes affecting plasma membrane do not confer resistance themselves but could drive the P-gp function [33-35], we hypothesize a possible drawing to understand how P-gp successfully maintains lower DXR concentrations. In this picture, a delay in the rate of passive transbilayer movement of DXR through the plasma membrane results in an enhanced ability of P-gp to recognize and extrude it out of the spheroids. Thus, when P-gp is absent (as in PSC-1 cells), the saturation of lipid targets permit the increase of the DXR concentration into the multicellular spheroids. Enhanced efficiency of P-gp to extrude substrates has been fully demonstrated by different members of the DXR and rhodamine dry analogues, with each one having different lipophilic properties [36].

Several studies have shown that the use of modulator agents provoke the sensitisation of cell growth as multicellular spheroids [37-39]. The efficacy of these agents is due to the higher permeability rate in relation to P-gp substrates [40]. However, when INER-51 spheroids were pre-treated with 10 μM of the modulator agent of Cs-A, no increase in DXR retention was observed. A similar phenomenon was observed in multicellular spheroids treated with verapamil [38,39]. Today, a number of studies using various techniques have suggested a probable model of interaction between P-gp-substrates with modulators agents and how these molecules bind to different sites on P-gp [41]. Four binding sites have been identified on P-gp of which vinblastine and daunorubicin bind to the site I, whereas modulators bind to site IV. In this model, all the binding sites display allosteric interaction between each one of them, thus affecting P-gp-mediated activity. In addition, an unrecognised binding site has been proposed for Rho-123 [42-44]. Thus, the failure of Cs-A to inhibit P-gp-mediated DXR efflux may be a consequence of changes in the P-gp affecting the modulator-binding site or the allosteric inhibition with some hypothetic molecule. Recently, in cells with MDR-phenotype, it has been demonstrated that a specific interaction exists between P-gp and HSP-90 [45]. If spherules formation elicits the expression of HSP-90, which is able to bind P-gp, the failure of Cs-A inhibition might be understood. Furthermore, the allosteric inhibition of the modulator site by unknown factors could be an explanation for the common failure seen when solid tumours, including lung cancer tumours, are treated with reversal agents [46].

Another interesting observation came from the impact of ATP depletion in DXR retention. For this experiment we used a metabolic cocktail poison to be certain of the ATP pools depletion. However, this treatment was unable to increase DXR retention in multicellular spheroids but its effect was evident in monolayers. Since, there is a general consensus in the literature that P-gp is an energy-driven pump, where the energy is provided by the hydrolysis of ATP, our data are puzzle. Nevertheless, using competitions assays, Biswas EE [47], demonstrated that NBD1 of histidine permease (Hisp) and maltose transporter protein (Malk), two ABC members, can function as a general nucleotide binding domain, with a nucleotide preference CTP>GTP>ATP>>UTP. Thus, the impact of ATP depletion in DXR retention is not understood for the moment.

In recent years, it has become clear that the multiple non-P-gp mediated mechanisms may be operational in tumour spheroids to confer MCR [48]. One mechanism most recently described is the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), which is a drug pump efflux able to efficiently extrude DXR [49]. Since INER-51 cells express mRNA for BRCP, we cannot discard the activity of this protein as a mechanism that helps to maintain lower DXR retention levels. However, the activity of BCRP as pump efflux is higher for Rho-123 efflux than DXR, although their contribution to the drug retention in spheroids is controversial [50].

In addition to DXR resistance, INER-51 spheroids also showed resistance to other anticancer drugs such as etoposide and methotrexate. Commonly, the etoposide-resistance involves alterations in the nuclear target enzymes topoisomerases. Oloumi et al[51] indicate that alterations in subcellular localization of topoisomerases type II may have an important role in resistance to cytotoxic agents when cells are in a close contact. Whereas Luo et al[52] showed that phosphorylation of topo II alpha was reduced at least 10-fold in the outer cells of V79 spheroids relative to monolayers. However, the role of topoisomerase II alpha as a mechanism to confer MCR to etoposide in INER-51 spheroids has not been evaluated yet and will be considered for future experiments.

A different situation can be speculated for the resistance to methotrexate. Under physiological conditions, the weak acid methotrexate tends to be in the charged form and is taken up into cells largely by a folate transport mechanism. Unlike DXR, methotrexate is not sequestered in membranes nor in acidic endosomes, but it may be "trapped" inside cells by polyglutamation [53]. Thus, the differences in methotrexate resistance of INER-51 cells relative to PSC-1 cells could arise from differences in P-gp-independent metabolic pathways.

Finally, several reports have shown a lower MDR-1 expression in NSCLC [54]. However, some authors have shown an important role of P-gp expression in lung cancer tumours and particularly in lung cancer diagnosed in people whom smoke tobacco [55-57]. Due to our findings, it would be interesting to evaluate both the levels of P-gp expression as well as P-gp activity in lung cancer tumours.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that in INER-51 cells cultured as multicellular spheroids, a more efficient P-gp activity is responsible for maintaining lower retention levels of DXR in comparison to the P-gp activity of cells grown as monolayers. Interestingly, whereas the P-gp expression helps maintain lower levels of DXR in the multicellular spheroids, the mechanisms that govern the MCR seems to be different because the lack of P-gp-expression only showed a minor impact of resistance to several chemotherapeutic drugs, suggesting that other non-P-gp mechanisms are also operating.

Methods

Chemicals

Doxorubicin (DXR) was provided by Farmitalia-Carlo Erba, whereas Cyclosporin-A was provided by Sandoz Farma, whereas SDZ PSC 833 was gift by Novartis. Rhodamine-123 (Rho-123) and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Sigma (St. Luis, MO, USA). All of the working solutions were initially dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and posterior dilutions were put in culture medium.

Cell lines and culture conditions

The lung cancer cell line INER-51 and its clone PSC-1 (non-expressing P-gp or P-gpneg) were grown as monolayer cultures in RPMI-1640 medium at 37°C in 5% CO2. INER-51 is a NSCLC cell line established in our laboratory from pleural effusion of patient diagnosed with primary lung cancer without previous chemotherapy treatment. The kidney cell line A498 (expressing P-gp) and the lung adenocarcinoma cell line INER-37 (expressing MRP1) were used as controls of P-gp function and MRP1 expression, respectively. The culture medium was supplemented with 10% FCS (Sigma, Co. St. Luis, MO, USA), 1% non-essential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml of penicillin and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin.

Culture of monolayers and multicellular spherules

Monolayer cells were passed a week by trypsin-EDTA solution (Invitrogen™, USA). To obtain multicellular spheroids, 3.5 × 105 exponentially tumour cells were seeded in 1% agarose-coated (24-well/plate) in RPMI-1640 complete medium [14]. Cultures were routinely grown for 72 hours to acquire multicellular spheroids of approximately of 500 μm of diameter.

P-gp non-expressing mutant clones

In order to obtain one mutant clone with the capacity to not express P-gp, INER-51 cells were treated as described by Beketic-Oreskovic, et al[15]. Briefly, 1 × 106 tumour cells were seeded in a T25 plastic tissue culture flask (Falcon, USA). When the cell culture achieved a semi-confluent grade, the culture medium was removed and fresh complete medium was added containing 5 μM DXR and 5 μM of SDZ PSC 833. The cells were maintained under this condition during two weeks until some survival clones were evident upon microscopic observation. A total of 6 survival clones were isolated, propagated for a month in absence of drugs, and tested for MDR1 expression by in vitro RT-PCR. One mutant clone that manifested stable for mdr1neg phenotype was selected and cloned again. Each clone obtained was tested for MDR-1 expression again. Finally, the clone PSC-1 was further propagated and used for studies in the present communication.

Drug resistance in monolayers or multicellular spheroids

The level of resistance to drugs was determined with the use of MTT assay as previously described by S. Cole [16] and on multicellular systems as evaluated by Furukawa, et al[17]. For monolayers, 7 × 103 cells/well were plated in 96-well/plate (Costar, USA) and drugs were added in different concentrations per well. In the case of multicellular spheroids, they were obtained as described above and were fed with fresh complete medium containing different drug concentration. After 72 hours, the culture medium was retired and MTT reagent diluted in PBS was added to obtain a final concentration of 2 mg/ml. After incubation for 4 hours, individual spheroids surrounded with formazan crystals were transferred into 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes. Cells in monolayers were washed carefully with PBS once. Both monolayers and multicellular spheroids crystals were dissolved by addition of 100% DMSO for 20 min with occasional shaking. Absorbance at 540 nm was measured using an automated microplate reader (Labsystem Multiskan MS, Finland). In each experiment, the drug determination was analysed in six individual wells. Cell survival was estimated as a percentage of the corresponding control. Drug-cytotoxicity was assayed by the IC50, corresponding to the 50% decrease in cell survival rate respective to not-drug treated cultures.

Doxorubicin and Rhodamine-123 retention assays

Exponentially growing cells (3.5 × 105) were seeded 72 hours prior to treatment with drugs in 1% agar-coated 24-well tissue culture plates as described above. Either multicellular spheroids or monolayer cells were incubated with increased concentrations of DXR or Rho-123 for 30 min and then washed with fresh drug-free medium twice and PBS once. Cell suspensions from monolayers were obtained by tripsinization whereas multicellular spheroids were recovered using micropipette tips. To exclude artefacts arising from DXR quenching by binding to DNA and accumulating in acidic organelles, DXR was extracted from spheroids with the method described by Wartenberg et al[18]. Finally, intracellular DXR or Rho-123 were determined by spectrofluormetry (Phototechnology, International, Princeton, New Jersey, USA) at λem 580 nm and λex 427 or λem 510 nm and λex 480 respectively.

Doxorubicin efflux assays

The efflux assays were based on those previously described [19]. Briefly, monolayers or multicellular spheroids were drug loaded with DXR (30 μM) throughout incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 30 min. The loading cells were then washed with a complete drug-free ice-cold medium and either placed on ice or incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for different intervals of time. This incubation allowed drug efflux to occur, and during experimental time the remaining drug was quantitated by spectrofluormetry as described above.

Circumvention of P-gp-mediated efflux with Cs-A or ATP-depletion

For evaluation of P-gp activity, monolayers or multicellular spheroids were pre-incubated for 1 hour with increasing drug concentrations of cyclosporin-A (Cs-A). After pre-incubation, multicellular spheroids were loaded for 30 min with 30 μM of DXR in presence of the reversal agent and afterwards the DXR uptake was assessed again. For ATP-depletion, cells were pre-incubated for 20 min at 4°C in PBS/BSA (1 mg/ml) containing 1 mM sodium-cyanide, 10 mM sodium-fluoride and 10 mM sodium azide prior to the addition of DXR. After centrifugation at 1000 × g for 15 min, both monolayers and multicellular spheroids were loaded with different DXR concentrations in the presence of ATP synthesis inhibitors and the fluorescence was measured as mentioned above.

In vitro Reverse transcriptase-PCR assay

Total RNA was extracted from the cell lines with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen™, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Single stranded cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription from 5 μg of total RNA using Superscript™ RNAse Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen™, USA) and oligo-dT16–18. The amplification was performed in a final volume of 25 μl, containing 0.5 μl cDNA, 50 pM of each oligonucleotide primer, 30 μM of each dNTPs, 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4) and 50 mM KCl. Amplification was carried out in a Thermal Cycler (Programmed Thermal Controller, model PTC-100, MJ Research Inc., USA) for 35 cycles of denaturalisation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55–60°C for 2 min, and polymerisation at 72°C for 3 min. The PCR primers and expected product size were as follows: For MDR-1, forward: 5'-cccatcattgcaatagcagg-3' and reverse: 5'-gttcaaacttctgctcctga-3 [150 bp]; MRP1, forward: 5'-tctctcccgacatgaccgagg-3' and reverse: 5'-ccaggaatatgatgccccgacttc-3' [140 bp]; topoisomerase IIα, forward: 5'-tttaaggcccaagtccagttaaac-3' and reverse: 5'-gtataacaatatcatcaagattgt [343 pb]; topoisomerase IIβ, forward: 5'-gaagtgttcactagtaaaatacagt-3' and reverse: 5'-cataatctttccatagcgtaaggtt-3' [336 bp]; topoisomerase I, forward: 5'-aagcagaggaagtagctacg-3' and reverse: 5'-gctcatctgtttccgagctt-3' [206 bp]; GST-μ, forward: 5'-gaactccctgaaaagctaaag-3' and reverse: 5'-gttgggctcaaatatacggtgg-3' [250 bp]; G3PDH, forward: 5'-tggggaaggtgaaggtcgga-3' and reverse: 5'-gaaggggtcattgatggcaa-3' [110 bp].

List of abbreviations

Cs-A: Cyclosporin-A

DXR: Doxorubicin

MCR: Multicellular resistance

MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide

NSCLC: Non-small cell lung cancer

P-gp: P-Glycoprotein

Rho-123: Rhodamine 123

MDR: Multidrug Resistance

DMSO: Dimethyl sulfoxide

Authors' contributions

All author(s) contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Ms. Christine Wilson for linguistic revision and Rodolfo Ocádiz Delgado (CINVESTAV-IPN) for critical and technical review of the manuscript.

This work was submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the D. Sc. Degree for Ponce de Leon Suarez,V., at DOCTORADO EN CIENCIAS BIOMEDICAS, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTONOMA DE MEXICO

Contributor Information

Ponce de León Valeria, Email: valeponsua@yahoo.com.mx.

Barrera-Rodríguez Raúl, Email: raul_barrera@iner.gob.mx.

References

  1. Hrycyna C. Molecular genetic analysis and biochemical characterization of mammalian P-glycoprotein involved in multidrug resistance. Cell Dev Biol. 2001;12:247–256. doi: 10.1006/scdb.2000.0250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sauna ZE, Smith MM, Müller M, Kerr KM, Ambudkar SV. The Mechanism of action of multidrug-resistance-linked P-glycoprotein. J Bioenergetics Biomembranes. 2001;33:481–491. doi: 10.1023/A:1012875105006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gottesman MM, Fojo T, Bates SE. Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:48–58. doi: 10.1038/nrc706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Takeshita H, Kusuzaki K, Ashihara T, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ, Hirasawa Y. Actin organization associated with the expression of multidrug-resistant phenotype in osteosarcoma cells and the effect of actin depolymerization on drug resistance. Cancer Lett. 1998;126:75–81. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(97)00539-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Luciani F, Molinari A, Lozupone F, Calcabrini A, Lugini L, Strigaro A, Puddu P, Arancia G, Cianfriglia M, Fais S. P-Glycoprotein-actin association through ERM family proteins: a role in P-glycoprotein function in human cells of lymphoid origin. Blood. 2002;99:641–648. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.2.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Callaghan R, van Gorkom LC, Epand RM. A comparison of membrane properties and composition between cell lines selected and transfected for multi-drug resistance. Br J Cancer. 1992;66:781–786. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Le Moyec L, Tatoud R, Degeorges A, Calabresse C, Bauza G, Eugene M, Calvo F. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveals cellular lipids involved in resistance to adriamycin and taxol by the K562 leukemia cell line. Cancer Res. 1996;56:3461–3467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sutherland RM, Eddy HA, Bareham B, Reich K, Vanantwerp D. Resistance to adriamycin in multicellular spheroids. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5:1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(79)90643-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mueller-Klieser W. Three-dimensional cell cultures: from molecular mechanism to clinical applications. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:C1109–1123. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.273.4.C1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kobayashi H, Man S, Graham CH, Kapitain SJ, Teicher BA, Kerbel RS. Acquired multicellular-mediated resistance to alkylating agents in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:3294–3298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kolchinsky A, Roninson IB. Drug resistance conferred by MDR1 expression in spheroids formed by glioblastoma cell lines. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:3321–3327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Desoize B, Gimonet D, Jardiller JC. Cell culture as spheroids: an approach to multicellular resistance. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:4147–4158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kerbel RS, Rak J, Kobayashi H, Man MS, St Croix B, Granham CH. Multicellular resistance: a new paradigm to explain aspects of acquired drug resistance of solid tumors. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1994;59:661–672. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1994.059.01.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yuhas JM, Li AP, Martinez AO, Landman AJ. A simplified method for production and growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. Cancer Res. 1977;37:3639–3643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Beketic-Oreskovic L, Durán GE, Chen G, Dumontet C, Sikic BI. Decrease mutation rate for cellular resistance to doxorubicin and suppression of mdr1 gene activation by the Cyclosporin PCS 833. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1593–1602. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cole SP. Rapid chemosensitivity testing of human lung tumor cells using the MTT assay. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1986;17:259–263. doi: 10.1007/BF00256695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Furukawa T, Kubota T, Watanabe M, Takahara T, Yamaguchi H, Takeuchi T, Kase S, Kadaira S, Ishibiki K, Kitajima M, Hoffman RM. High in vitro-in vivo correlation of drug response using sponge-gel-supported three-dimensional histoculture and the MTT end point. Int J Cancer. 1992;51:489–498. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910510325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wartenberg M, Frey C, Diedershagen H, Ritgen J, Hescheler J, Sauer H. Development of an intrinsic P-glycoprotein-mediated doxorubicin resistance in quiescent cell layers of large, multicellular prostate tumor spheroids. Int J Cancer. 1998;75:855–863. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980316)75:6&#x0003c;855::AID-IJC7&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hrycyna CA, Ramachandra M, Pastan I, Gottesman MM. Functional expression of human P-glycoprotein from plasmids using vaccinia virus-bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase system. Methods Enzymol. 1998;292:456–473. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(98)92035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moriyama Y, Manabe T, Yoshimori T, Tashiro Y, Futai M. ATP-dependent uptake of anti-neoplastic agents by acidic organelles. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1994;115:213–218. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schindler M, Grabski S, Hoff E, Simon SM. Defective pH regulation of acidic compartments in human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) is normalized in Adriamycin resistant cells (MCF-7adr) Biochemistry. 1996;35:2811–2817. doi: 10.1021/bi952234e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nederman T, Norling B, Glimelius B, Carlsson J, Brunk U. Demonstration of an extracellular matrix in multicellular tumor spheroids. Cancer Res. 1984;44:3090–3097. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bichat F, Mouawad R, Solis-Recendez G, Khayat D, Bastian G. Cytoskeleton alteration in MCF7R cells, a multidrug resistant human breast cancer cell line. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:3393–3402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. dit Faute MA, Laurent L, Ploton D, Poupon MF, Jardillier JC, Bobichon H. Distinctive alterations of invasiveness, drug resistance and cell-cell organization in 3D-cultures of MCF-7, a human breast cancer cell line, and its multidrug resistant variant. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002;9:161–168. doi: 10.1023/A:1014594825502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jakubowicz-Gil J, Paduch R, Gawron A, Kandefer-Szerszen M. The effect of heat shock, cisplatin, etoposide and quercetin on Hsp27 expression in human normal and tumour cells. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2002;40:31–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosi A, Grande S, Luciani AM, Barone P, Mlynarik V, Viti V, Guidoni L. 1H MRS studies of signals from mobile lipids and from lipid metabolites: comparison of the behavior in cultured tumor cells and in spheroids. NMR Biomed. 2004;17:76–91. doi: 10.1002/nbm.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hazlehurst LA, Dalton WS. Mechanisms associated with cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR) in hematopoitec malignances. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2001;20:43–50. doi: 10.1023/A:1013156407224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wartenberg M, Ling FC, Muschen M, Klein F, Acker H, Gassmann M, Petrat K, Putz V, Hescheler J, Sauer H. Regulation of the multidrug resistance transporter P-glycoprotein in multicellular tumor spheroids by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) and reactive oxygen species. FASEB J. 2003;17:503–505. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0358fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pedro D, Beltran PJ, Wang YF, Bucana CD, Yoon SS, Deguzman ACP, Fidler IJ. Cell density-dependent regulation of mdr-1 gene expression in murine colon cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 1996;9:865–878. doi: 10.3892/ijo.9.5.865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tunggal JK, Melo T, Ballinger JR, Tannock IF. The influence of expression of P-glycoprotein on the penetration of anticancer drugs through multicellular layers. Int J Cancer. 2000;86:101–107. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000401)86:1&#x0003c;101::AID-IJC16&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tritton TR. Cell surface actions of adriamycin. Pharmacol Ther. 1991;49:293–309. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(91)90060-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Goormaghtigh E, Chatelain P, Caspers J, Ruysschaert JM. Evidence of a specific complex between adriamycin and negatively-charged phospholipids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;597:1–14. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(80)90145-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin C, Walker J, Rothnie A, Callaghan R. The expression of P-glycoprotein does influence the distribution of novel fluorescent compounds in solid tumour models. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1581–1589. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Alemán C, Annereau JP, Liang XJ, Cardarelli CO, Taylor B, Yin JJ, Aszalos A, Gottesman MM. P-glycoprotein, expressed in multidrug resistant cells, is not responsible for alterations in membrane fluidity or membrane potential. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3084–3091. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ferté J. Analysis of the tangled relationships between P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance and the lipid phase of the cell membrane. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:277–294. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01046.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Eytan GD, Regev R, Oren G, Assaraf YG. The role of passive transbilayer drug movement in multidrug resistance and its modulation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:12897–12902. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.6.3163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ehrlich PH, Moustafa ZA, Archinal-Mattheis AE, Newman MJ, Bair KW, Cohen D. The reversal of multidrug resistance in multicellular tumor spheroids by SDZ PSC 833. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:129–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Anderson M, Warr JR. Expression of verapamil hypersensitivity in multidrug-resistant cells grown as multicellular spheroids. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1990;26:151–154. doi: 10.1007/BF02897263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sakata K, Kwok TT, Gordon GR, Walch NS, Sutherland RM. Resistance to verapamil sensitization of multidrug-resistant cells grown as multicellular spheroids. Int J Cancer. 1994;59:282–286. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910590222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tunggal JK, Cowan DS, Shaikh H, Tannock IF. Penetration of anticancer drugs through solid tissue: a factor that limits the effectiveness of hemotherapy for solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:1583–1586. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. He L, Liu GQ. Interaction of multidrug resistance reversal agents with P-glycoprotein ATPase activity on blood-brain barrier. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2002;23:423–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Martin C, Berridge G, Higgins CF, Mistry P, Charlton P, Callaghan R. Communication between multiple drug binding sites on P-glycoprotein. Mol Pharmacol. 2000;58:624–632. doi: 10.1124/mol.58.3.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hicks KO, Ohms SJ, van Zijl PL, Denny WA, Hunter PJ, Wilson WR. An experimental and mathematical model for the extravascular transport of DNA intercalator in tumours. Br J Cancer. 1997;76:894–903. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cowan DSM, Hicks KO, Wilson WR. Multicellular membranes as in vitro model for extravascular diffusion in tumours. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:528s–531s. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Bertram J, Palfner K, Hiddemann W, Kneba M. Increase of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance by hsp 90 beta. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:838–845. doi: 10.1097/00001813-199611000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Millward MJ, Cantwell BM, Munro NC, Robinson A, Corris PA, Harris AL. Oral verapamil with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised study. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1031–1035. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Biswas EE. Nucleotide binding domain 1 of the human retinal ABC transporter functions as a general ribonucleotidase. Biochemistry. 2001;40:8181–8187. doi: 10.1021/bi0106686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gottesman MM. Mechanisms of cancer resistance. Ann Rev Medicine. 2002;53:615–657. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.103929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Doyle LA, Ross DD. Multidrug resistance mediated by the breast cancer resistance protein BCRP ABCG2. Oncogene. 2003;22:7340–7358. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Honjo Y, Hrycyna CA, Yan Q-W, Medina-Perez WY, Robery RW, van de Laar A, Litman T, Dean M, Bates SE. Acquired mutations in the MXR/BCRP/ABCP gene alter substrate specificity in MXR/BCRP/ABCP-overexpressing cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:6635–6639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Oloumi A, MacPhail SH, Johnston PJ, Banath JP, Olive PL. Changes in subcellular distribution of topoisomerase II alpha correlate with etoposide resistance in multicell spheroids and xenograft tumors. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5747–5753. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Luo C, Johnston PJ, MacPhail SH, Banath JP, Oloumi A, Olive PL. Cell fusion studies to examine the mechanism for etoposide resistance in Chinese hamster V79 spheroids. Exp Cell Res. 1998;243:282–289. doi: 10.1006/excr.1998.4170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhao R, Goldman ID. Resistance to antifolates. Oncogene. 2003;22:7340–7358. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Scagliotti GV, Novello S, Salvaggi G. Multidrug resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 1999;10:S83–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1008329010443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yeh JJ, Hsu WH, Wang JJ, Ho ST, Kao A. Predicting chemotherapy response to paclitaxel-based therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with P-glycoprotein expression. Respiration. 2003;70:32–35. doi: 10.1159/000068411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Volm M, Mattern J, Samsel B. Overexpression of P-gp and glutathione S-transferase-π in resistant non-small cell lung carcinomas of smokers. Br J Cancer. 1991;64:700–704. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Oka M, Fukuda M, Sakamoto A, Takatani H, Fukuda M, Soda H, Kohno S. The clinical role of MDR1 gene expression in human lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:721–724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Cell International are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES