Understanding Australian Massage Therapist’s Awareness of and Knowledge to Recognize Domestic and Family Violence: Findings from a Community Survey

Sarah Fogarty; Phillipa Hay; Kathleen Baird

doi:10.3822/ijtmb.v18i1.1117

. 2025 Mar 15;18(1):39–53. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v18i1.1117

Understanding Australian Massage Therapist’s Awareness of and Knowledge to Recognize Domestic and Family Violence: Findings from a Community Survey

Sarah Fogarty ^1,^*, Phillipa Hay ^1,^2,³, Kathleen Baird ⁴

PMCID: PMC11856436 PMID: 40092710

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate massage therapists’ knowledge, confidence, and awareness of domestic and family violence (DFV) in clinical practice. An online questionnaire methodology was used to collect data from Australian massage therapists who were 18 years or over. The study was open for participation for 6 months. The authors developed the questionnaire based on a previous massage therapy profession questionnaire; it included 64 questions in three sections. Two hundred and seventeen respondents formed the dataset. This study found respondents with prior experience of DFV were significantly more likely to have undertaken DFV training than respondents with no prior experience of DFV (p = 0.004). Almost two-thirds of respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that they would like some training to better understand DFV (n = 142, 65.4%) and to better understand their responsibilities around DFV (n = 149, 68.7%). Over half of the respondents were somewhat or very confident they would recognize the signs and symptoms of DFV (n = 126, 58.3%). Over half of respondents (n = 119, 54.8%) felt somewhat knowledgeable about DFV. The main theme from the qualitative analysis was absent resources. The subthemes were (i) without training I cannot help, (ii) prepare me, train me early, and (iii) support me with resources. This study concluded that there is a lack of resources and a deficiency in skills and knowledge among massage therapists to recognize and respond appropriately to domestic violence in clinic. Respondents indicated a desire to learn more about DFV in their practices as they deemed that without training, education, and resources they cannot provide the best of care for their clients.

Keywords: Massage, domestic violence, domestic and family violence, massage education

INTRODUCTION

Domestic and family violence (DFV) is “any violent, threatening, coercive, or controlling behavior that occurs in current or past family, domestic or intimate relationships that causes the person experiencing the behavior to feel fear”.^(1,2) In Australia, an estimated 8 million people (41%) aged 18 years and over have experienced violence (physical and/or sexual) since the age of 15.⁽³⁾ The context for DVF is different between men and women with women being three times more likely to experience violence from an intimate partner (23% (2.3 million) compared to 7.3% (692, 000)),⁽³⁾ and on average, one woman a week is murdered by their intimate partner.^(4,5) Women are highly represented as massage consumers.^(6–8) Sohnen-Moe and Benjamin maintain a massage “practitioner could generally expect that approximately one in five clients will likely be a survivor of sexual abuse” (p. 295).⁽⁹⁾ The massage therapist’s treatment space is a place where practitioners are “likely, at some point, to come into contact with a client who either is or has been subjected to domestic violence” (p. 2).⁽¹⁰⁾ This is because several health-care providers suggest that individuals who have experienced DFV may use massage or body-oriented therapies as a means of healing.^(10–15) Additionally, those experiencing DFV may seek massage therapy to alleviate both psychological and physical distress.⁽¹⁶⁾

Individuals with a history of DFV often experience mental and or physical issues including chronic pain, chronic anxiety, depression, insomnia, and physical tension or pain,^(11,17–19) all of which may precipitate the visit to a massage therapist. Potential massage or body-oriented therapy benef its for individuals who have experienced DFV include improved mood, enhanced psychological health, reduced post-traumatic stress, lowered anxiety, decreased life stress, increased sense of safety, and reduced chronic pain symptoms.^(12,20,21) While there are potential health and emotional benefits from massage therapy for individuals who have experienced DFV, there are also a number of concerns about the potential harm that could be caused by massage therapists in such cases. A small study by Hixon found that 70% of the respondents (n = 10) had been triggered or experienced memories of abuse during a massage session (massage was used as part of their healing journey from DFV).⁽¹¹⁾ Sixty percent of participants had some safety concerns during their massage (n = 6) and 30% of participants felt unsafe during a massage (n = 3); however, it was unclear whether they felt emotionally and or physically unsafe.⁽¹¹⁾ Experiencing emotional distress while receiving massage therapy was not uncommon (n = 7, 70%) either due to the effects of their own trauma and/or their interactions with the massage therapist.⁽¹¹⁾ These concerns highlight the importance of the therapeutic environment and the need for DFV-specific education for therapists.^{(11,12,15,22)}

A lack of massage training about DFV and the need for greater education has been acknowledged since early this century^(11,19) with Hixon stating that despite the prevalence of DFV, “massage therapists have yet to be included in a formal training process involving education or protocols for working with abuse survivors” (p. 2).⁽¹¹⁾ Given the high rates of DFV and the potential for harm to occur to individuals who have experienced DFV during a massage treatment consultation, it is important to explore what knowledge, awareness, and training massage therapists have about DFV. Therefore, the objective of this research was to investigate massage therapists’ knowledge, confidence, and awareness of DFV in clinical practice.

METHOD

The study used an online questionnaire-based survey methodology. The methodology for this research project has been described in another publication using the same dataset.⁽²³⁾ The dataset was separated for analysis due to the large amount of data collected. The study was approved by the Western Sydney University Human Ethics Committee (approval number H14636) on 22 November 2021. Respondents were not paid or incentivized for participation.

Inclusion Criteria, Sample, and Recruitment

Massage therapists over 18 years of age, who were currently practicing or had recently ceased practicing in Australia, and who were able to read and understand English were recruited using convenience sampling.⁽²⁴⁾

The recruitment involved an email invitation from the Association of Massage Therapists (AMT) in Australia (approximately 3,200 therapists) and massage organizations social media posts (with approximately 14,797 followers). The online questionnaire-based survey was hosted on the Qualtrics online survey platform and was open for participation for 6 months from March 15 to September 15, 2022. Massage therapists who responded within the time frame became the sample. Consent was implied by participants by undertaking the online questionnaire-based survey.

Questionnaire Design and Data Collection

A survey was developed to ascertain massage therapists’ knowledge and confidence to recognize, respond, and refer in situations involving DFV in clinical practice.⁽²³⁾ Demographic questions were informed by a previous questionnaire of the massage therapy profession.⁽²⁵⁾ Tripartite scales (such as yes, unsure, no), rating scales, multiple-choice questions, and open-ended questions comprised the survey questionnaire options. The final survey included 64 questions in three sections (1) Demographics, (2) Recognize family and domestic violence, and (3) Respond to domestic and family violence (with four subsections: (i) disclosures, (ii) referrals, (iii) further education, and (iv) final comments). This article concentrates on the responses from section 2 and section 3 subsections iii and iv.

Analysis

Data were removed for participants who did not consent, did not provide any data (missing responses), and participants who did not answer any of the domestic violence questions. Descriptive statistics of demographic information are presented as means and standard deviations (SDs) for continuous data. Discrete data were analyzed using “frequency distributions (percentages). Chi-square tests of independence were used to test frequency of distribution of dependent variables (the agreement with statements) with the independent variable (personal experience of family and domestic violence). A Fisher’s exact test was used where there were cells with values less than 5. The threshold for significance was p ≤ 0.05”.⁽²³⁾ A post hoc test for each subset of possible paired comparisons was undertaken, including a Bonferroni’s correction for those variables with significant differences to reduce the chance of a type I error occurring.⁽²⁶⁾ Data analysis was undertaken using SPSS.⁽²⁷⁾ “The open-ended questions were analyzed using inductive content analysis. The first author (SF) read the data and created codes directly from the open-ended survey responses. The codes were then condensed into meaningful categories and themes”.⁽²⁸⁾

RESULTS

There were 217 respondents for whom their data were included after removing data that did not meet the inclusion criteria (n = 2) and where only the demographic information was completed (n = 19). Almost half of the respondents (n = 104; 49.5%) had a prior experience of DFV.

Quantitative Data

Demographics

For full demographic results, see Fogarty et al.⁽²³⁾ In summary, over 80% of respondents identified as female (>80%) with almost three quarters living in the eastern mainland states (New South Wales: n = 92, 42.4%; Queensland: n = 44, 20.3%; and Victoria: n = 26, 12%). Respondents had a mean age of 48 years (SD 12.4). Over three quarters had a diploma qualification in massage (n = 165, 76.0%) and were members of AMT (n = 188, 86.6%) Respondents who identified as female were significantly more likely to have had a prior experience of DFV and respondents that identified as male were significantly less likely to have a prior experience of DFV (p = 0.049). The mean time in active practice was over 10 years (mean 10.8 years; SD 8.7). The majority of respondents worked in an urban location (n = 145, 66.8%), were self-employed (n = 170, 78.3%) and identified as sole practitioners (n = 139, 64.1%).⁽²³⁾

Domestic violence

Training

Undertaken training (Table 1): The proportion of respondents who had undertaken DFV training was low (n = 35, 16.1%) with very few receiving this training as a part of their massage-context-specific education (n = 2). Respondents with prior experience of DFV were significantly more likely to have undertaken DFV training than respondents with no prior experience of DFV (p = 0.004).

Table 1.

Undertaken DFV Training and Desire for DFV Training

	No Personal Experience of DFV (n = 109) n (%)	Personal Experience of DFV (n = 108) n (%)	Comparing Experience of DFV
Undertaken DFV training			Fisher’s exact test, p
No	99 (90.8%) ^a	82 (75.9%) ^b	χ² = 8.978, 0.004^*
Yes	10 (9.2%) ^a	25 (23.1%) ^b
Did not respond	0 (0%)^a	1 (0.9%)^a
Types of training		n	Approximate hours
Read a book		1	2
Online training		4	1–2
DFV training via vocational training such as degree in social work/counseling or qualified family case worker/youth worker/police officer		13	Over 50 hours
Legislation and domestic violence		1	8
Full day course		2	8
Received training as part of therapy for experiencing DFV		3	15
Participation in DFV program		1	15
Trauma workshop		3	9–15
Part of massage diploma course		2	1–2
Foster carer		1	Did not state
Desire for DFV training
I would like to undertake some training to better understand DFV
Strongly agree	42 (38.5%)	44 (40.7%)	χ² = 1.492, 0.946
Agree	31 (28.4%)	25 (23.1%)
Neither agree nor disagree	12 (11.0%)	11 (10.2%)
Disagree	2 (1.8%)	2 (1.9%)
Strongly disagree	0	0
I would like to undertake some training to better understand my responsibilities in DFV
Strongly agree	46 (42.2%)	45 (41.7%)	χ² = 1.532, 0.944
Agree	30 (27.5%)	28 (25.9%)
Neither agree nor disagree	7 (6.4%)	7 (6.5%)
Disagree	3 (2.8%)	1 (0.9%)
Strongly disagree	0	0
I would like to undertake some training to write a DFV policy and procedure for my clinic
Strongly agree	25 (22.9%)	34 (31.5%)	χ² = 4.121, 0.684
Agree	32 (29.4%)	23 (21.3%)
Neither agree nor disagree	22 (20.2%)	18 (16.7%)
Disagree	3 (2.8%)	4 (3.7%)
Strongly disagree	2 (1.8%)	1 (0.9%)
I believe my massage association should provide more information about DFV policies
Strongly agree	26 (23.9%)	34 (31.5%)	χ² = 8.590, 0.096
Agree	32 (29.4%)	34 (31.5%)
Neither agree nor disagree	25 (22.9%)	15 (13.9%)
Disagree	4 (3.7%)	0 (0%)
Strongly disagree	0	0

Open in a new tab

Within a row, the same superscript letter denotes categories whose proportions do not differ significantly from each other at the 0.05 level and a different superscript letter denotes categories whose proportions do differ signifiantly from each other. Bold values highlight significant results.

DFV = domestic and family violence.

p < 0.05.

Desire for training (Table 1)

Respondents’ desire for DFV training was not associated with prior experience of DFV. Almost two-thirds of respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that they would like some training to better understand DFV (n = 142, 65.4%) and just over two-thirds of respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that they would like some training to better understand their responsibilities around DFV (n = 149, 68.7%).

Confidence and knowledge about the signs and symptoms of DFV and awareness of types of abuse and individuals at risk

Confidence and knowledge (Table 2): Over half of the respondents were somewhat or very confident they would recognize the signs and symptoms of DFV (n = 126, 58.3%) and just over two fifth the signs and symptoms of child abuse (n = 95, 42.8%). Over half of the respondents (n = 119, 54.8%) felt somewhat knowledgeable about DFV. Significantly more respondents who had a prior experience of DFV were very confident that they would recognize the signs and symptoms of DFV (p = 0.17), and in their knowledge of DFV (p < 0.001) than respondents with no prior experience of DFV. Confidence to recognize the signs and symptoms of child abuse was not associated with the experience of DFV.

Table 2.

Confidence and Knowledge About the Signs and Symptoms of DFV

	No Personal Experience of DFV (n = 109) n (%)	Personal Experience of DFV (n = 108) n (%)	Comparing Experience of DFV
How would you rate your confidence to recognize the signs and symptoms of DFV in one of your clients?			χ² (df,n) p
Very confident	7 (6.4%) ^a	18 (16.7%) ^b	12.063 (2, 173) 0.016^*
Somewhat confident	47 (43.1%)^a	54 (50.0%)^a
Unsure	31 (28.4%) ^a	16 (14.8%) ^b
How would you rate your confidence to recognize signs and symptoms of child abuse?
Very confident	5 (4.6%)	13 (12.0%)	6.935 (2, 168) 0.139
Somewhat confident	45 (41.3%)	50 (46.3%)
Unsure	33 (30.3%)	22 (20.4%)
How knowledgeable do you feel DFV?
Very confident	7 (6.4%) ^a	21 (19.4%) ^b	19.221 (2, 167) <0.001^*
Somewhat confident	57 (52.3%)^a	62 (57.4%)^a
Unsure	18 (16.5%) ^a	7 (6.5%) ^b

Open in a new tab

df = degrees of freedom; DFV = domestic and family violence.

p < 0.05.

Awareness of type of abuse and individuals at risk (Table 3)

Table 3.

Awareness of Type of Abuse and Risk for Experience DFV

Awareness of Types of Abuse and Risk for Experiencing Abuse

Awareness of Types of Abuse

Domestic and family violence includes many different forms of abuse, please indicate your awareness with the following forms of domestic and family violence	No Personal Experience of DFV (n = 109)	Personal Experience of DFV (n = 108)	Comparing Experience of DFV
	n (%)	n (%)	Fisher’s exact test, p
Emotional control/violence
I am extremely aware of this form of DFV	56 (63.6%) ^a	70 (84.3%) ^b	χ² = 11.938, 0.004^*
I am very aware this is a form of DFV	21 (23.9%)^a	12 (14.5%)^a
I am moderately aware this is a form of DFV	7 (8.0%) ^a	1 (1.2%) ^b
I am slightly aware this is a form of DFV	4 (4.5%)^a	0^b
I am not at all aware this is a form of DFV	0^a	0^a
Financial abuse
I am extremely aware of this form of DFV	45 (51.1%) ^a	60 (72.3%) ^b	χ² = 9.359, 0.036^*
I am very aware this is a form of DFV	24 (27.3%)^a	16 (19.3%)^a
I am moderately aware this is a form of DFV	13 (14.8%)^a	5 (6.0%)^a
I am slightly aware this is a form of DFV	4 (4.5%)^a	2 (2.4%)^a
I am not at all aware this is a form of DFV	2 (2.3%)^a	0^a
Image-based abuse
I am extremely aware of this form of DFV	16 (18.6%)^a	25 (30.1%)^a	χ² = 10.585, 0.031^*
I am very aware this is a form of DFV	17 (19.8%)^a	24 (28.9%)
I am moderately aware this is a form of DFV	20 (23.3%)^a	19 (22.9%)^a
I am slightly aware this is a form of DFV	9 (10.5%)^a	6 (7.2%)^a
I am not at all aware this is a form of DFV	24 (27.9%) ^a	9 (10.8%) ^b

Awareness of Risk for Experiencing Abuse

	No Personal Experience of DFV (n = 109)	Personal Experience of DFV (n = 108)	Comparing Experience of DFV
	n (%)	n (%)	Comparing Experience of DFV

Please indicate the groups you know are at risk for experiencing domestic and family violence			Fisher’s exact test, p
Elderly men
Extremely high risk	22 (26.2%)^a	26 (31.3%)^a	χ² = 9.984, 0.033^*
High risk	29 (34.5%)^a	38 (45.8%)^a
Medium risk	22 (26.2%) ^a	10 (12.0%) ^b
Low risk	7 (8.3%)^a	9 (10.8%)^a
Minimal risk	4 (4.8%) ^a	0 ^b
Women from culturally and linguistically diverse communities
Extremely high risk	29 (34.9%) ^a	45 (53.6) ^b	χ² = 9.213, 0.031^*
High risk	32 (38.6%)^a	28 (33.3%)^a
Medium risk	17 (20.5%)^a	11 (13.1%)^a
Low risk	3 (3.6%)^a	0^a
Minimal risk	2 (2.4%)^a	0^a
Young men
Extremely high risk	7 (8.5%)^a	10 (1.2%)^a	χ² = 11.603, 0.020^*
High risk	15 (18.3%)^a	24 (29.3%)^a
Medium risk	24 (29.3%)^a	30 (36.6%)^a
Low risk	20 (24.4%)^a	14 (17.1%)^a
Minimal risk	16 (19.5%) ^a	4 (4.9%) ^b
Young women
Extremely high risk	20 (24.1%) ^a	37 (44.0%) ^b	χ² = 8.871, 0.047^*
High risk	38 (45.8%)^a	33 (39.3%)^a
Medium risk	18 (21.7%)^a	10 (11.9%)^a
Low risk	6 (7.2%)^a	3 (3.6%)^a
Minimal risk	1 (1.2%)^a	1 (1.2%)^a
Men who experience mental health issues
Extremely high risk	9 (10.7%) ^a	21 (25.0%) ^b	χ² = 15.689, 0.002^*
High risk	32 (38.1%)^a	41 (48.8%)^a
Medium risk	35 (41.7%) ^a	15 (17.9%) ^b
Low risk	6 (7.1%)^a	7 (8.3%)^a
Minimal risk	2 (2.4%)^a	0^a
Culturally and linguistically diverse people
Extremely high risk	10 (12.2%) ^a	23 (27.7%) ^b	χ² = 10.128, 0.026^*
High risk	30 (36.6%)^a	30 (36.6%)^a
Medium risk	35 (42.7%) ^a	21 (25.3%) ^b
Low risk	6 (7.3%)^a	9 (10.8%)^a
Minimal risk	1 (1.2%)^a	0^a
Women with substance misuse
Extremely high risk	30 (36.0%) ^a	50 (60.2%) ^b	χ² = 9.766, 0.013^*
High risk	42 (51.2%) ^a	27 (32, 5%) ^b
Medium risk	9 (11.0%)^a	6 (7.2%)^a
Low risk	1 (1.2%)^a	0^a
Minimal risk	0^a	0^a

Open in a new tab

Only statistically significant results are reported in this table. For all other results, see Fogarty et al.⁽²³⁾ Bold values highlight significant results. Within a row, the same superscript letter denotes categories whose proportions do not differ significantly from each other at the 0.05 level and a different superscript letter denotes categories whose proportions do differ signifiantly from each other.

DFV = domestic and family violence.

p < 0.05.

Significantly more respondents with a prior experience of DFV were extremely aware of emotional control/violence (p = 0.004) and financial abuse (p = 0.036) as types of abuse compared to respondents with no personal experience of DFV. Significantly more respondents who had no prior experience of DFV were not aware of image-based abuse (p = 0.031) as a type of abuse compared to respondents with a prior experience of abuse.

Significantly more respondents with a prior experience of DFV ranked women from culturally and linguistically diverse communities (p = 0.031), young women (p = 0.047), and individuals from culturally and linguistically diverse communities (p = 0.026) at a higher risk of DFV than respondents with no prior experience of DFV. Significantly more respondents with no prior experience of DFV ranked elderly (p = 0.033) and young (p = 0.020) men at lower risk of DFV than respondents with a prior experience of DFV.

Legal requirements and reporting DFV in practice

Legal requirements (Table 4): Being aware of mandatory reporting obligations was not associated with prior personal experience of DFV.

Table 4.

Legal Requirements

	No Experience of DFV (n = 109)	Personal Experience of DFV (n = 108)	Comparing Experience of DFV
Are you aware of any mandatory reporting obligations you have as a massage therapist?			χ² (df,n) p
Yes, I am aware that I have mandatory reporting obligations	61 (56.0%)	59 (54.6%)	0.62 (1, 639) 0.735
Yes, I am aware that I have no mandatory reporting	24 (22.0%)	17 (15.7%)
Unsure	61 (56.0%)	59 (54.6%)
No. I don’t know if I have any mandatory reporting obligations	24 (22.0%)	17 (15.7%)

Open in a new tab

df = degrees of freedom; DFV = domestic and family violence.

Reporting DFV in practice (Appendix Table S1) Mandatory reporting

The responses to mandatory DFV reporting were not associated with prior experience of DFV. Three states or territories in Australia (South Australia, Northern Territory, and New South Wales) have mandatory reporting of child abuse (including witnessing DFV) for massage therapists. Under half the respondents were aware of specific instances where they would be required to report (n = 48, 46.6%), a third of respondents understood the process of reporting (n = 34, 33.0%), and over 50% of respondents felt comfortable reporting report child abuse (n = 56, 54.4%). For massage therapists practicing in clinics close to state borders or interstate who treat clients where there are no mandatory reporting obligations, over a third would feel the need to report child abuse in the context of DFV (n = 39, 37.9%). Less than 5% of respondents felt they would not report, despite it being mandatory (n = 5, 4.9) due to being unsure if DFV was occurring, not knowing who to speak to, or fearing for their own safety or the safety of the victim.

Voluntary reporting

The responses associated with voluntary reporting of DFV were significantly associated with prior experience of DFV. Four states or territories in Australia (Victoria, Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory, and Western Australia) do not have mandatory reporting of child abuse for massage therapists. Over two fifths of respondents were not aware of whether (and what) consent was required from clients if they decided to voluntarily report child abuse in the context of DFV (n = 50, 43.9%), although 42.1% (n = 42) were aware of the process involved. An openended question asked respondents under what circumstances they would report child abuse in the context of DFV. Responses included situations where they observed physical traces of abuse or evidence of emotional trauma in a child, being confident that abuse was occurring, having the latest and accurate information for reporting, or believing the child was in danger.

Qualitative Data

An open-ended question asked respondents if they had any additional thoughts about massage therapy and DFV. The main theme from the analysis of responses to this open-ended question related to knowledge and training was absent resources. The subthemes were (i) without training I cannot help, (ii) prepare me, train me early, and (iii) support me with resources.

Absent resources

This theme illustrates the void of training and knowledge for massage therapists regarding DFV especially in their practices. Massage therapists are not generally provided any education about DFV within the context of clinical massage care and respondents expressed that without training, education, and resources they cannot provide the best care for their clients.

“Without training I cannot help”

Respondents felt that “as massage therapists we are in a unique position to recognise and support victims of domestic abuse” (Respondent 156, no personal experience of DFV); however, they felt under-resourced to do this and identified a lack of training in recognizing and/or responding to DFV. This lack of training had impacts across all aspects of DFV including recognizing DFV and knowing the best practice processes and procedures if DFV was disclosed or reported to a massage therapist: “without further training, in the absence of physical evidence of abuse and…psychological evidence (my observations and a client’s revelations), my capacity to identify DFV is limited.” (Respondent 80, no personal experience of DFV) This was reinforced by respondent 84 (no personal experience of DFV) who stated: “I don’t believe we have any training or understanding of what we have to do if [DFV is] reported to us”. Respondents identified massage soft skills that might be helpful when working with people who were experiencing DFV, but they felt they needed additional training on DFV inquiry and responding to cultivate DFV support skills; “aside from listening and being sympathetic, I don’t have any training as to how to handle someone in a domestic and family violence crisis situation” (Respondent 77, personal experience of DFV). Respondents also articulated a need to find out more about the available services for DFV but acknowledged that “I clearly don’t need that information unless I also learn how to recognise domestic violence clues and how to approach it with clients” (Respondent 70, no personal experience of DFV).

Some respondents had received some education and training in DFV, but felt that additional training or upskilling was necessary: it “is always good to review and renew skills and refresh” (Respondent 98, personal experience of DFV). This sentiment was echoed by respondent 76 (personal experience of DFV) who felt they were “always available to help others and be an advocate, if necessary, of victims of violence. So new current information is very much welcomed”. Those that were less familiar with DFV were interested in gaining knowledge and training in the DFV area to provide adequate support such as respondent 99 (personal experience of DFV): “I am fortunate that I have not had too many domestic and family violence cases in my clinic, but I still see that I need to upskill in this area.”

Reporting of DFV was an area that many respondents indicated a lack of knowledge and understanding and the desire for more upskilling, specifically in terms of the process of how to report DFV and child abuse in relation to DFV, and who it to report to, thereby highlighting the need for further education and clarity in this area: “I haven’t been placed in a situation where I felt there was domestic violence happening however realize that although I would have no hesitation in reporting it, I don’t fully know the process” (Respondent 90, personal experience of DFV). This was reinforced by Respondent 70 (no personal experience of DFV) who felt that “I don’t know the requirements for reporting or the services because the discussions with colleagues tend to be people in all different areas of Australia—so I end up confused.”

Participating in the research lead some respondents to recognize their lack of awareness about DFV “reading the [research] questions … made me aware that I do not know enough on this issue [DFV]” (Respondent 179, no personal experience of DFV). This was similar for Respondent 71 (no personal experience of DFV) who expressed that DFV: “is not something I have thought of a lot—and something I now think I need training in.”

“Prepare me, train me early”

Several respondents shared their experiences about their initial massage training/education curriculum stating that “training in domestic and family violence was not a part of my schooling” (Respondent 112, personal experience of DFV). Respondents expressed a desire that DFV training “should be part of initial training/qualifications so that we have an understanding of the physical and emotional trauma that people may have experienced and how that may present in the clinic. Also, around the legalities and our responsibilities as therapists.” (Respondent 196, personal experience of DFV). Respondents felt that DFV training should be part of the education you receive when studying to become a massage therapist as “massage therapists are uniquely placed to offer support to people experiencing DFV” (Respondent 158, no personal experience of DFV).

“Support me with resources”

Respondents expressed a need for diverse pedagogic resources to be better equipped to manage DFV within their practice. The requests for different pedagogic resources was broad covering all areas of DFV in clinical practice such as Respondent 36 (no personal experience of DFV) who wanted resources on management in clinical practice: “Some super simple info with steps to follow would be most helpful for me. Mostly knowing what to look out for, things I should be concerned about, how to respond to that.” Requests for resources were sought after with respondents desiring a pre-created contact list and details of DFV support services and other respondents wanted printable resources for the clinic. The creation of a universal DFV formal policy was requested by several respondents, as was the need for a step-by-step guide covering several aspects of DFV in clinical practice including “practical advice and management” on how to deal with DFV (Respondent 195, no personal experience of DFV).

A small number of respondents felt massage associations could provide some of the DFV training and resources with associations offering a “webinar or community course link that members could access” (Respondent 164, personal experience of DFV) and the contact details of DFV support services, with massage associations having “all information on the website i.e., contacts” (Respondent 184, personal experience of DFV).

DISCUSSION

The study findings reveal a lack of resources and a deficiency in skills and knowledge among massage therapists to recognize and respond appropriately to domestic violence in their workspace. Respondents expressed a desire for more training and resources, particularly during the early stages of their massage training/education.

Most respondents were positively inclined to support individuals experiencing DFV but also expressed feeling inadequately equipped with the necessary resources and education. This aligns with findings for other health professions who also felt unprepared “to ask relevant questions about DFV and felt like they had inadequate knowledge about available resources”.⁽²⁹⁾ Similar to Ali et al., our research found that personal experiences of DFV influenced therapists’ confidence and ability to identify DFV.⁽³⁰⁾ The massage community needs to address the inconsistent knowledge identified in our research regarding recognition of DFV and best-practice care and support for clients experiencing DFV. Educational programs for DFV have varied outcomes with many programs indicating improvements post training in the areas of preparedness, confidence, knowledge, and readiness to respond to and support individuals experiencing DFV.⁽³¹⁾ These improvements have been shown to be short lived in some programs with decreases in knowledge 1 year post training^(32,33) but well maintained in other programs with 3- and 6-month post training evaluations.^(34,35) Utilizing previous DFV training programs could help massage educators and the massage industry to develop a training program that creates a lasting knowledge base and improves effective communication between individuals experiencing DFV and massage therapists. All of which has been proven to be pivotal in improving both the health and safety of individuals experiencing DFV.⁽³⁶⁾

Educating health professionals to identify, assist, and respond to DFV has been a focus in the last 20 years.^{(29–32,37–40)} Health professionals including physicians, midwives, and nurses have been identified to work in unique positions where DFV is often disclosed and recognized. As a result, they have been a primary focus of DFV education recognition, response, and intervention.^(32,37) Similar to the findings of this questionnaire, previous research on medical students and physicians revealed 50% of respondents never talked about partner violence to their patients, and consequently the need for improved training was identified.^(32,38) Respondents in our study expressed a desire for DFV education to be integrated early in their massage education with many advocating for the education to be part of their initial massage training. The integration of DFV training in medical undergraduate courses has attempted and a number of barriers and challenges have been recognized, including limited time and resources within the medical curriculum to teach/educate students about DFV and no universally agreed DFV content.^(37,41,42) The time spent learning about DFV in these programs varied from 2 to 8 hours^(37,42) illustrating the differing content of the programs. Another challenge identified was measuring the effectiveness of DFV curricula with there being no consistent validated tool for assessing efficacy.⁽⁴¹⁾ While respondents advocated for DFV education to be part of their initial massage training, there may be several challenges with implementing this and the massage industry and educational institutions could learn from the medical professions experience of integrating DFV training within the education system to identify and address the barriers and challenges and enhance successful implementation.

Massage therapists often have clients who disclose DFV,⁽²³⁾ which positions them to be well placed to provide support. Findings from our research indicate a need for improved education to increase knowledge and organizational support to enhance therapists’ knowledge, confidence, and ability to adequately respond to and care for clients experiencing DFV.⁽⁴³⁾ Massage therapists in Australia do not train in the same environments as other health-care professionals such as general practitioners or nurses and consequently they often do not have access to university resources. Additionally, when massage therapists graduate, they predominately work part time and are self-employed sole-traders or microbusinesses^(44,45) and they do not access to the same resources that large primary health-care workplaces may have. Much of the research on DFV education and training programs focuses on medium-to-large educational/workplace entities with substantial infrastructure.^{(29–32,37–40)} As a result these DFV training programs cannot be directly applied to massage therapists, highlighting the need for additional support to enhance massage therapist knowledge. The hairdressing industry is one industry that has similar education and workplace business practices to massage therapists. They have developed DFV training^(46,47) that could be integrated with existing health professional educational content and research. This integration could provide a preliminary model for the massage therapy industry to develop the content and structure of DFV education specific to massage therapists.

Limitations

The dataset is a convenience sample and may not be fully representative of all massage therapists due to self-selection bias. The questionnaire did not specifically address educational content, potentially overlooking specific educational and content needs of different groups such as culturally and linguistically diverse massage therapists and those working in in a rural setting. Further research is required to identify the specific content and delivery modes necessary for an effective educational DFV program.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed a lack of resources and a deficiency in skills and knowledge among massage therapists to recognize and respond appropriately to domestic violence in clinic. Respondents indicated a desire to learn more about DFV in their practices as they deemed that without training, education, and resources they cannot provide the best of care for their clients. Respondents expressed a desire for the training to be undertaken during the early stages of their massage training/education. The massage industry could utilize previous learnings from DFV education in hairdressing, and healthcare to develop DFV content and delivery options for future educational DFV and massage programs.

APPENDIX

Table S1.

Reporting Domestic and Family Violence in Practice

Mandatory reporting (Asked to respondents who indicated they practice in South Australia, Northern Territory, and New South Wales)				Voluntary reporting (Asked to respondents who indicated they practice in Victoria, Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory, and Western Australia)

	No Personal Experience DFV (n = 53) n (%)	Personal Experience of DFV (n = 50) n (%)	Comparing Experience of DFV		No Personal Experience DFV (n = 56) n (%)	Personal Experience of DFV (n = 58) n (%)	Comparing Experience of DFV
Are you aware of the specific instances where you would be required to mandatory report child abuse?			χ² (df,n) p	If you decide to report child abuse in the context of family violence, do you understand what consents are required?			Fisher’s exact test, p
No	7 (13.2%)	11 (22.0%)	3.304 (3, 103) 0.347	No	30 (53.6%)	20 (34.5%)	χ² = 5.570, 0.134
Unsure	15 (28.3%)	8 (16.0%)		Unsure	13 (23.2%)	17 (29.3%)
Yes	23 (43.4%)	25 (50.0%)		Yes	2 (3.6%)	7 (12.1%)
Did not respond	8 (15.1%)	6 (12.0%)		Did not respond	11 (19.6%)	14 (24.1%)
Do you understand the process to follow when you have to mandatory report child abuse?				If you decided to report child abuse in the context of family violence, are you aware of the process involved?			χ² (df,n) p
No	13 (24.5%)	13 (26.0%)	2.949 (3, 103) 0.400	No	27 (48.2%)	16 (27.6%)	6.334 (3, 114) 0.096
Unsure	18 (34.0%)	11 (22.0%)		Unsure	13 (22.4%)	16 (28.6%)
Yes	14 (26.4%)	20 (40.0%)		Yes	5 (8.9%)	12 (20.7%)
Did not respond	8 (15.1%)	6 (12.0%)		Did not respond	11 (19.6%)	14 (24.1%)
Would you feel comfortable if you had to mandatory report child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?				Would you feel comfortable reporting child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?
No	7 (13.2%)	6 (12.0%)	1.362 (3, 103) 0.714	No	6 (10.7%)	6 (10.3%)	0.791 (3, 114) 0.869
Unsure	12 (22.6%)	8 (16.0%)		Unsure	16 (28.6%)	13 (22.4%)
Yes	26 (49.1%)	30 (60.0%)		Yes	23 (41.1%)	25 (43.1%)
Did not respond	8 (15.1%)	6 (12.0%)		Did not respond	11 (19.6%)	14 (24.1%)
Is there any situation that you feel you would not report child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?			Fisher’s exact test, p	Is there a situation that you feel you would report child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?			Fisher’s exact test, p
No	33 (62.3%)	29 (58.0%)	χ² = 0.938, 0.851	No	4 (7.1%)	8 (13.8%)	χ² = 4.703, 0.193
Unsure	10 (18.9%)	12 (24.0%)		Unsure	26 (46.4%)	16 (27.6%)
Yes	2 (3.8%)	3 (6.0%)		Yes	14 (25.0%)	19 (32.8%)
Did not respond	8 (15.1%)	6 (12.0%)		Did not respond	12 (21.4%)	15 (25.9%)
For practitioners living near state boarders or seeing a client from interstate with no mandatory reporting obligations, would you feel like you need to report child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?				If you see a client from a state that has mandatory reporting, would you be aware of the reporting requirements?			χ² (df,n) p
No	1 (1.9%)	0	χ² = 1.579, 0.789	No	19 (33.9%)	15 (25.9%)	2.854 (3, 114) 0.415
Unsure	8 (15.1%)	5 (10.0%)		Unsure	19 (33.9%)	16 (27.6%)
Yes	19 (35.8%)	20 (40.0%)		Yes	7 (12.5%)	13 (22.4%)
Did not respond	25 (47.2%)	25 (50.0%)		Did not respond	11 (19.6%)	14 (24.1%)

Open in a new tab

df = degrees of freedom; DFV = domestic and family violence.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION: The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING: No sources of funding were used in this study.

REFERENCES

1.Victorian Government. What is family violence? Victorian Government; 2021. [Reviewed May 7, 2021]. [Accessed March 31, 2024]. https://www.vic.gov.au/what-family-violence . [Google Scholar]
2.Department of Families Fairness and Housing. What is family violence? Victoria State Government; 2018. [Accessed March 31, 2024]. Updated February 1, 2018. https://services.dffh.vic.gov.au/what-family-violence . [Google Scholar]
3.Australian Bureau of Statistics. Rates of physical and sexual assault, family and domestic violence, economic and emotional abuse, stalking, sexual harassment, and childhood abuse. Australian Government; 2023. [Accessed June 22, 2024]. Personal Safety, Australia. Updated November 15, 2023. March 15, 2023. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/personal-safety-australia/latest-release . [Google Scholar]
4.Cussen T, Bryant W. Domestic/Family Homicide in Australia. Research in practice, no. 38. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2015. [Google Scholar]
5.Bryant W, Bricknell S. Homicide in Australia 2012–13 and 2013–14: National Homicide Monitoring Program Report. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2017. [Google Scholar]
6.Ladanyi S, Adams J, Sibbritt D. Massage therapy utilisation by Australian women: prevalence and determinants. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020;24(3):29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Ladanyi S, Adams J, Sibbritt D. Use of massage therapy by mid-aged and older Australian women. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03626-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Murthy V, Sibbritt D, Adams J, Broom A, Kirby E, Refshauge KM. Consultations with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners amongst wider care options for back pain: a study of a nationally representative sample of 1,310 Australian women aged 60–65 years. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(2):253–262. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2357-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Sohnen-Moe C, Benjamin BE. The Ethics of Touch: The Hands-on Practitioner’s Guide to Creating a Professional, Safe, and Enduring Practice. Tucson, AZ: Sohnen-Moe Associates; 2021. Accessed via VitalSource Bookshelf. Books of Discovery. [Google Scholar]
10.Razo RJ. Massage Today. May 30, 2009. Understanding domestic violence: what massage therapists should know. [Google Scholar]
11.Hixon A. Examining the Benefits of Massage Therapy for Survivors of Sexual and Domestic Violence. Birmingham, AL: Clayton College of Natural Health, Dissertation.com; 2005. [Google Scholar]
12.Price C. Body-oriented therapy as an adjunct to psychotherapy in childhood abuse recovery: a case study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2002;6(4):228–236. doi: 10.1054/jbmt.2002.0307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13.Becker KA. Dissertation Abstracts International. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology. 2003. Utilizing Bodywork Therapy with Psychologically Traumatized Individuals: A Study of the Demographics of Bodywork Clients. [Google Scholar]
14.Stalker CA, Schachter CL, Teram E. Facilitating effective relationships between survivors of childhood sexual abuse and health care professionals. Affilia. 1999;14(2):176–198. doi: 10.1177/08861099922093590. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15.Mathiesen GC, Clark AM. Working With Domestic Violence Survivors as a Massage Therapist. Scotts Valley, CA: Createspace Independent Pub; 2016. p. 64. [Google Scholar]
16.Price C. Characteristics of women seeking body-oriented therapy as an adjunct to psychotherapy during recovery from childhood sexual abuse. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2004;8(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/S1360-8592(03)00077-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17.Bloom S. The grief that dare not speak its name. Part II: dealing with the ravages of childhood abuse. Pyschother Rev. 2000;2:469–472. [Google Scholar]
18.Kendall-Tackett K, Marshall R, Ness K. Chronic pain syndromes and violence against women. Women Ther. 2003;26(1–2):45–56. doi: 10.1300/J015v26n01_03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19.Mines S. Massage & Bodywork Magazine. October/November, 2001. Healing triumphs over domestic violence. Unlocking and responding to a client’s trauma. [Google Scholar]
20.Field T, Hernandez-Reif M, Hart S, Quintino O, Drose LA, Field T, et al. Effects of sexual abuse are lessened by massage therapy. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 1997;1(2):65–69. doi: 10.1016/S1360-8592(97)80002-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
21.Price C. Body-oriented therapy in sexual abuse recovery: a pilot-test comparison. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2006;10(1):58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2005.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22.Schachter CL, Stalker CA, Teram E. Toward sensitive practice: issues for physical therapists working with survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Phys Ther. 1999;79(3):248–261. doi: 10.1093/ptj/79.3.248. discussion 262–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Fogarty S, Hay P, Baird K. Understanding Australian massage therapists’ attitudes and confidence to respond to domestic and family violence in clinical practice: findings from a community survey. J Fam Viol. 2024:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10896-024-00729-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
24.Harrell B. Data Collection Methods: Semistructured Interviews and Focus Groups. Arlington, VA: Rand Corporation; 2009. [Google Scholar]
25.Baskwill A. Awareness of the Evidence for practice of RMTs in Ontario. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University; 2014. [Google Scholar]
26.Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2009. [Google Scholar]
27.Corp IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac. Version 27.0 ed. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2020. [Google Scholar]
28.Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Ali P, Ayyaz R, McGarry J, Younas A, Watson R, East L. Preparedness of Australian and British nurses and midwives about domestic violence and abuse. Int Nurs Rev. 2023;70(4):494–500. doi: 10.1111/inr.12814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Ali P, McGarry J, Younas A, Inayat S, Watson R. Nurses’, midwives’ and students’ knowledge, attitudes and practices related to domestic violence: a cross-sectional survey. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(6):1434–1444. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Baird KM, Saito AS, Eustace J, Creedy DK. Effectiveness of training to promote routine enquiry for domestic violence by midwives and nurses: a pre-post evaluation study. Women Birth. 2018;31(4):285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Takov V, Harnden A, Rummel K, Burnell M, McMann S, Wargel CE, et al. Evaluation of a community hospital- based residencies’ intimate partner violence education by a domestic violence shelter expert. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(9):1–15. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Papadakaki M, Petridou E, Kogevinas M, Lionis C. Measuring the effectiveness of an intensive IPV training program offered to Greek general practitioners and residents of general practice. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Baird K, Creedy DK, Saito AS, Eustace J. Longitudinal evaluation of a training program to promote routine antenatal enquiry for domestic violence by midwives. Women Birth. 2018;31(5):398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Madden K, Sprague S, Petrisor BA, Farrokhyar F, Ghert MA, Kirmani M, et al. Orthopaedic trainees retain knowledge after a partner abuse course: an education study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(7):2415–2422. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4325-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Alvarez CP, Davidson PM, Fleming C, Glass NE. Elements of effective interventions for addressing intimate partner violence in Latina women: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Baum A, Valpied J, Kuruppu J, Hegarty K. Intimate partner violence education in Australian medical schools: Has anything changed? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022;46(2):111–116. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Williamson KJ, Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Brady MJ, Partap A, Wolf WL. Screening for domestic violence: practice patterns, knowledge, and attitudes of physicians in Arizona. South Med J. 2004;97(11):1049–1054. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000136266.92364.B6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Carlson M, Kamimura A, Al-Obaydi S, Trinh HN, Franchek-Roa K. Background and clinical knowledge of intimate partner violence: a study of primary care residents and medical students at a United States Medical School. Health Equity. 2017;1(1):77–82. doi: 10.1089/heq.2017.0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Barnard M, Bynum LA, Bouldin A. Preparing student pharmacists to care for patients exposed to intimate partner violence. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021;13(12):1619–1626. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Ghaith S, Voleti SS, Ginsberg Z, Marks LA, Files JA, Kling JM. A scoping review of published intimate partner violence curricula for medical trainees. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2022;31(11):1596–1613. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Valpied J, Aprico K, Clewett J, Hegarty K. Are future doctors taught to respond to intimate partner violence? A study of Australian medical schools. J Interpers Violence. 2017;32(16):2419–2432. doi: 10.1177/0886260515592616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Aljomaie HAH, Hollingdrake O, Cruz AA, Currie J. A scoping review of the healthcare provided by nurses to people experiencing domestic violence in primary health care settings. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2022;4:100068. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Ooi SL, Smith L, Pak SC. Evidence-informed massage therapy—an Australian practitioner perspective. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;31:325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Wardle JL, Barnett R, Adams J. Practice and research in Australian massage therapy: a national workforce survey. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2015;8(2):2–11. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v8i2.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.FVREE. HAIR3RS Recognise + Respond + Refer. 2022. [Accessed July 15, 2024]. Cited July 15, 2024. https://www.hair3rs.org.au/about-us/
47.Hamilton-Smith L. Hairdressers across the country to be trained in recognising domestic violence and elder abuse. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) News. Mar 6, 2021. [Accessed July 15, 2024]. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-06/queensland-hairdressers-with-heart-training-domestic-violence/13216320 .

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1.

Reporting Domestic and Family Violence in Practice

Mandatory reporting (Asked to respondents who indicated they practice in South Australia, Northern Territory, and New South Wales)				Voluntary reporting (Asked to respondents who indicated they practice in Victoria, Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory, and Western Australia)

	No Personal Experience DFV (n = 53) n (%)	Personal Experience of DFV (n = 50) n (%)	Comparing Experience of DFV		No Personal Experience DFV (n = 56) n (%)	Personal Experience of DFV (n = 58) n (%)	Comparing Experience of DFV
Are you aware of the specific instances where you would be required to mandatory report child abuse?			χ² (df,n) p	If you decide to report child abuse in the context of family violence, do you understand what consents are required?			Fisher’s exact test, p
No	7 (13.2%)	11 (22.0%)	3.304 (3, 103) 0.347	No	30 (53.6%)	20 (34.5%)	χ² = 5.570, 0.134
Unsure	15 (28.3%)	8 (16.0%)		Unsure	13 (23.2%)	17 (29.3%)
Yes	23 (43.4%)	25 (50.0%)		Yes	2 (3.6%)	7 (12.1%)
Did not respond	8 (15.1%)	6 (12.0%)		Did not respond	11 (19.6%)	14 (24.1%)
Do you understand the process to follow when you have to mandatory report child abuse?				If you decided to report child abuse in the context of family violence, are you aware of the process involved?			χ² (df,n) p
No	13 (24.5%)	13 (26.0%)	2.949 (3, 103) 0.400	No	27 (48.2%)	16 (27.6%)	6.334 (3, 114) 0.096
Unsure	18 (34.0%)	11 (22.0%)		Unsure	13 (22.4%)	16 (28.6%)
Yes	14 (26.4%)	20 (40.0%)		Yes	5 (8.9%)	12 (20.7%)
Did not respond	8 (15.1%)	6 (12.0%)		Did not respond	11 (19.6%)	14 (24.1%)
Would you feel comfortable if you had to mandatory report child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?				Would you feel comfortable reporting child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?
No	7 (13.2%)	6 (12.0%)	1.362 (3, 103) 0.714	No	6 (10.7%)	6 (10.3%)	0.791 (3, 114) 0.869
Unsure	12 (22.6%)	8 (16.0%)		Unsure	16 (28.6%)	13 (22.4%)
Yes	26 (49.1%)	30 (60.0%)		Yes	23 (41.1%)	25 (43.1%)
Did not respond	8 (15.1%)	6 (12.0%)		Did not respond	11 (19.6%)	14 (24.1%)
Is there any situation that you feel you would not report child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?			Fisher’s exact test, p	Is there a situation that you feel you would report child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?			Fisher’s exact test, p
No	33 (62.3%)	29 (58.0%)	χ² = 0.938, 0.851	No	4 (7.1%)	8 (13.8%)	χ² = 4.703, 0.193
Unsure	10 (18.9%)	12 (24.0%)		Unsure	26 (46.4%)	16 (27.6%)
Yes	2 (3.8%)	3 (6.0%)		Yes	14 (25.0%)	19 (32.8%)
Did not respond	8 (15.1%)	6 (12.0%)		Did not respond	12 (21.4%)	15 (25.9%)
For practitioners living near state boarders or seeing a client from interstate with no mandatory reporting obligations, would you feel like you need to report child abuse in the context of family and domestic violence?				If you see a client from a state that has mandatory reporting, would you be aware of the reporting requirements?			χ² (df,n) p
No	1 (1.9%)	0	χ² = 1.579, 0.789	No	19 (33.9%)	15 (25.9%)	2.854 (3, 114) 0.415
Unsure	8 (15.1%)	5 (10.0%)		Unsure	19 (33.9%)	16 (27.6%)
Yes	19 (35.8%)	20 (40.0%)		Yes	7 (12.5%)	13 (22.4%)
Did not respond	25 (47.2%)	25 (50.0%)		Did not respond	11 (19.6%)	14 (24.1%)

Open in a new tab

df = degrees of freedom; DFV = domestic and family violence.

[b1-ijtmb-18-39] 1.Victorian Government. What is family violence? Victorian Government; 2021. [Reviewed May 7, 2021]. [Accessed March 31, 2024]. https://www.vic.gov.au/what-family-violence . [Google Scholar]

[b2-ijtmb-18-39] 2.Department of Families Fairness and Housing. What is family violence? Victoria State Government; 2018. [Accessed March 31, 2024]. Updated February 1, 2018. https://services.dffh.vic.gov.au/what-family-violence . [Google Scholar]

[b3-ijtmb-18-39] 3.Australian Bureau of Statistics. Rates of physical and sexual assault, family and domestic violence, economic and emotional abuse, stalking, sexual harassment, and childhood abuse. Australian Government; 2023. [Accessed June 22, 2024]. Personal Safety, Australia. Updated November 15, 2023. March 15, 2023. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/personal-safety-australia/latest-release . [Google Scholar]

[b4-ijtmb-18-39] 4.Cussen T, Bryant W. Domestic/Family Homicide in Australia. Research in practice, no. 38. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2015. [Google Scholar]

[b5-ijtmb-18-39] 5.Bryant W, Bricknell S. Homicide in Australia 2012–13 and 2013–14: National Homicide Monitoring Program Report. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2017. [Google Scholar]

[b6-ijtmb-18-39] 6.Ladanyi S, Adams J, Sibbritt D. Massage therapy utilisation by Australian women: prevalence and determinants. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020;24(3):29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b7-ijtmb-18-39] 7.Ladanyi S, Adams J, Sibbritt D. Use of massage therapy by mid-aged and older Australian women. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03626-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b8-ijtmb-18-39] 8.Murthy V, Sibbritt D, Adams J, Broom A, Kirby E, Refshauge KM. Consultations with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners amongst wider care options for back pain: a study of a nationally representative sample of 1,310 Australian women aged 60–65 years. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(2):253–262. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2357-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b9-ijtmb-18-39] 9.Sohnen-Moe C, Benjamin BE. The Ethics of Touch: The Hands-on Practitioner’s Guide to Creating a Professional, Safe, and Enduring Practice. Tucson, AZ: Sohnen-Moe Associates; 2021. Accessed via VitalSource Bookshelf. Books of Discovery. [Google Scholar]

[b10-ijtmb-18-39] 10.Razo RJ. Massage Today. May 30, 2009. Understanding domestic violence: what massage therapists should know. [Google Scholar]

[b11-ijtmb-18-39] 11.Hixon A. Examining the Benefits of Massage Therapy for Survivors of Sexual and Domestic Violence. Birmingham, AL: Clayton College of Natural Health, Dissertation.com; 2005. [Google Scholar]

[b12-ijtmb-18-39] 12.Price C. Body-oriented therapy as an adjunct to psychotherapy in childhood abuse recovery: a case study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2002;6(4):228–236. doi: 10.1054/jbmt.2002.0307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[b13-ijtmb-18-39] 13.Becker KA. Dissertation Abstracts International. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology. 2003. Utilizing Bodywork Therapy with Psychologically Traumatized Individuals: A Study of the Demographics of Bodywork Clients. [Google Scholar]

[b14-ijtmb-18-39] 14.Stalker CA, Schachter CL, Teram E. Facilitating effective relationships between survivors of childhood sexual abuse and health care professionals. Affilia. 1999;14(2):176–198. doi: 10.1177/08861099922093590. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[b15-ijtmb-18-39] 15.Mathiesen GC, Clark AM. Working With Domestic Violence Survivors as a Massage Therapist. Scotts Valley, CA: Createspace Independent Pub; 2016. p. 64. [Google Scholar]

[b16-ijtmb-18-39] 16.Price C. Characteristics of women seeking body-oriented therapy as an adjunct to psychotherapy during recovery from childhood sexual abuse. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2004;8(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/S1360-8592(03)00077-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[b17-ijtmb-18-39] 17.Bloom S. The grief that dare not speak its name. Part II: dealing with the ravages of childhood abuse. Pyschother Rev. 2000;2:469–472. [Google Scholar]

[b18-ijtmb-18-39] 18.Kendall-Tackett K, Marshall R, Ness K. Chronic pain syndromes and violence against women. Women Ther. 2003;26(1–2):45–56. doi: 10.1300/J015v26n01_03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[b19-ijtmb-18-39] 19.Mines S. Massage & Bodywork Magazine. October/November, 2001. Healing triumphs over domestic violence. Unlocking and responding to a client’s trauma. [Google Scholar]

[b20-ijtmb-18-39] 20.Field T, Hernandez-Reif M, Hart S, Quintino O, Drose LA, Field T, et al. Effects of sexual abuse are lessened by massage therapy. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 1997;1(2):65–69. doi: 10.1016/S1360-8592(97)80002-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[b21-ijtmb-18-39] 21.Price C. Body-oriented therapy in sexual abuse recovery: a pilot-test comparison. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2006;10(1):58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2005.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[b22-ijtmb-18-39] 22.Schachter CL, Stalker CA, Teram E. Toward sensitive practice: issues for physical therapists working with survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Phys Ther. 1999;79(3):248–261. doi: 10.1093/ptj/79.3.248. discussion 262–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b23-ijtmb-18-39] 23.Fogarty S, Hay P, Baird K. Understanding Australian massage therapists’ attitudes and confidence to respond to domestic and family violence in clinical practice: findings from a community survey. J Fam Viol. 2024:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10896-024-00729-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[b24-ijtmb-18-39] 24.Harrell B. Data Collection Methods: Semistructured Interviews and Focus Groups. Arlington, VA: Rand Corporation; 2009. [Google Scholar]

[b25-ijtmb-18-39] 25.Baskwill A. Awareness of the Evidence for practice of RMTs in Ontario. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University; 2014. [Google Scholar]

[b26-ijtmb-18-39] 26.Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2009. [Google Scholar]

[b27-ijtmb-18-39] 27.Corp IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac. Version 27.0 ed. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2020. [Google Scholar]

[b28-ijtmb-18-39] 28.Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b29-ijtmb-18-39] 29.Ali P, Ayyaz R, McGarry J, Younas A, Watson R, East L. Preparedness of Australian and British nurses and midwives about domestic violence and abuse. Int Nurs Rev. 2023;70(4):494–500. doi: 10.1111/inr.12814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b30-ijtmb-18-39] 30.Ali P, McGarry J, Younas A, Inayat S, Watson R. Nurses’, midwives’ and students’ knowledge, attitudes and practices related to domestic violence: a cross-sectional survey. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(6):1434–1444. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b31-ijtmb-18-39] 31.Baird KM, Saito AS, Eustace J, Creedy DK. Effectiveness of training to promote routine enquiry for domestic violence by midwives and nurses: a pre-post evaluation study. Women Birth. 2018;31(4):285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b32-ijtmb-18-39] 32.Takov V, Harnden A, Rummel K, Burnell M, McMann S, Wargel CE, et al. Evaluation of a community hospital- based residencies’ intimate partner violence education by a domestic violence shelter expert. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(9):1–15. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b33-ijtmb-18-39] 33.Papadakaki M, Petridou E, Kogevinas M, Lionis C. Measuring the effectiveness of an intensive IPV training program offered to Greek general practitioners and residents of general practice. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b34-ijtmb-18-39] 34.Baird K, Creedy DK, Saito AS, Eustace J. Longitudinal evaluation of a training program to promote routine antenatal enquiry for domestic violence by midwives. Women Birth. 2018;31(5):398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b35-ijtmb-18-39] 35.Madden K, Sprague S, Petrisor BA, Farrokhyar F, Ghert MA, Kirmani M, et al. Orthopaedic trainees retain knowledge after a partner abuse course: an education study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(7):2415–2422. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4325-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b36-ijtmb-18-39] 36.Alvarez CP, Davidson PM, Fleming C, Glass NE. Elements of effective interventions for addressing intimate partner violence in Latina women: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b37-ijtmb-18-39] 37.Baum A, Valpied J, Kuruppu J, Hegarty K. Intimate partner violence education in Australian medical schools: Has anything changed? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022;46(2):111–116. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b38-ijtmb-18-39] 38.Williamson KJ, Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Brady MJ, Partap A, Wolf WL. Screening for domestic violence: practice patterns, knowledge, and attitudes of physicians in Arizona. South Med J. 2004;97(11):1049–1054. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000136266.92364.B6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b39-ijtmb-18-39] 39.Carlson M, Kamimura A, Al-Obaydi S, Trinh HN, Franchek-Roa K. Background and clinical knowledge of intimate partner violence: a study of primary care residents and medical students at a United States Medical School. Health Equity. 2017;1(1):77–82. doi: 10.1089/heq.2017.0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b40-ijtmb-18-39] 40.Barnard M, Bynum LA, Bouldin A. Preparing student pharmacists to care for patients exposed to intimate partner violence. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021;13(12):1619–1626. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b41-ijtmb-18-39] 41.Ghaith S, Voleti SS, Ginsberg Z, Marks LA, Files JA, Kling JM. A scoping review of published intimate partner violence curricula for medical trainees. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2022;31(11):1596–1613. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b42-ijtmb-18-39] 42.Valpied J, Aprico K, Clewett J, Hegarty K. Are future doctors taught to respond to intimate partner violence? A study of Australian medical schools. J Interpers Violence. 2017;32(16):2419–2432. doi: 10.1177/0886260515592616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b43-ijtmb-18-39] 43.Aljomaie HAH, Hollingdrake O, Cruz AA, Currie J. A scoping review of the healthcare provided by nurses to people experiencing domestic violence in primary health care settings. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2022;4:100068. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b44-ijtmb-18-39] 44.Ooi SL, Smith L, Pak SC. Evidence-informed massage therapy—an Australian practitioner perspective. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;31:325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b45-ijtmb-18-39] 45.Wardle JL, Barnett R, Adams J. Practice and research in Australian massage therapy: a national workforce survey. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2015;8(2):2–11. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v8i2.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[b46-ijtmb-18-39] 46.FVREE. HAIR3RS Recognise + Respond + Refer. 2022. [Accessed July 15, 2024]. Cited July 15, 2024. https://www.hair3rs.org.au/about-us/

[b47-ijtmb-18-39] 47.Hamilton-Smith L. Hairdressers across the country to be trained in recognising domestic violence and elder abuse. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) News. Mar 6, 2021. [Accessed July 15, 2024]. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-06/queensland-hairdressers-with-heart-training-domestic-violence/13216320 .

PERMALINK

Understanding Australian Massage Therapist’s Awareness of and Knowledge to Recognize Domestic and Family Violence: Findings from a Community Survey

Sarah Fogarty, PhD

Phillipa Hay, PhD

Kathleen Baird, PhD

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

METHOD

Inclusion Criteria, Sample, and Recruitment

Questionnaire Design and Data Collection

Analysis

RESULTS

Quantitative Data

Demographics

Domestic violence

Training

Table 1.

Desire for training (Table 1)

Confidence and knowledge about the signs and symptoms of DFV and awareness of types of abuse and individuals at risk

Table 2.

Awareness of type of abuse and individuals at risk (Table 3)

Table 3.

Legal requirements and reporting DFV in practice

Table 4.

Reporting DFV in practice (Appendix Table S1) Mandatory reporting

Voluntary reporting

Qualitative Data

Absent resources

“Without training I cannot help”

“Prepare me, train me early”

“Support me with resources”

DISCUSSION

Limitations

CONCLUSION

APPENDIX

Table S1.

Footnotes

REFERENCES

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Table S1.

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases