Skip to main content
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1978 Jul 1;173(1):115–128. doi: 10.1042/bj1730115

Bifunctional intercalation and sequence specificity in the binding of quinomycin and triostin antibiotics to deoxyribonucleic acid.

J S Lee, M J Waring
PMCID: PMC1185755  PMID: 687363

Abstract

Quinomycin C, triostin A and triostin C are peptide antibiotics of the quinoxaline family, of which echinomycin (quinomycin A) is also a member. They all remove and reverse the supercoiling of closed circular duplex DNA from bacteriophage PM2 in the fashion characteristic of intercalating drugs, and the unwinding angle at I 0.01 is, in all cases, almost twice that of ethidium. Thus, as with echinomycin, they can be characterized as bifunctional intercalating agents. For the triostins this conclusion has been confirmed by measurements of changes in the viscosity of sonicated rod-like DNA fragments; the helix extension was found to be almost double that expected for a simple monofunctional intercalation process. For triostin A, further evidence for bifunctionality was derived from the cross-over point of binding isotherms to nicked circular and closed circular bacteriophage-PM2DNA. Binding curves for the interaction of quinomycin C and triostin A with a variety of synthetic and naturally occurring nucleic acids were determined by solvent-partition analysis, but triostin C was too insoluble in aqueous solution to make this method applicable. For quinomycin C the highest binding constant was found with Micrococcus lysodeikticus DNA, and its pattern of specificity among natural DNA species was broadly similar to that of echinomycin, although the binding constants were 2--6 times as large. For triostin A the highest binding constant was again found for M. lysodeikticus DNA, but the specificity pattern was quite different from that of the quinomycins. In particular, triostin A bound better to poly(dA-dT) than to the poly(dG-dC) whereas this order was reversed for quinomycin C. There was also evidence that the binding to poly(dA-dT) might be co-operative in nature. No significant interaction could be detected with poly(dA).poly(dT) or with RNA from Escherichia coli. Poly(dG).poly(dC) gave variable results, depending on the source of the polymer. The different patterns of specificity displayed by the quinomycins and triostins are tentatively ascribed to differences in their conformations in solution.

Full text

PDF
115

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cohen G., Eisenberg H. Conformation studies on the sodium and cesium salts of calf thymus deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Biopolymers. 1966 Apr-May;4(4):429–440. doi: 10.1002/bip.1966.360040404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dell A., Williams D. H., Morris H. R., Smith G. A., Feeney J., Roberts G. C. Structure revision of the antibiotic echinomycin. J Am Chem Soc. 1975 Apr 30;97(9):2497–2502. doi: 10.1021/ja00842a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Espejo R. T., Canelo E. S., Sinsheimer R. L. DNA of bacteriophage PM2: a closed circular double-stranded molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Aug;63(4):1164–1168. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.4.1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. INMAN R. B. TRANSITIONS OF DNA HOMOPOLYMERS. J Mol Biol. 1964 Sep;9:624–637. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80171-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee J. S., Waring M. J. Interaction between synthetic analogues of quinoxaline antibiotics and nucleic acids. Changes in mechanism and specificity related to structural alterations. Biochem J. 1978 Jul 1;173(1):129–144. doi: 10.1042/bj1730129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Martin D. G., Mizsak S. A., Biles C., Stewart J. C., Bacynsky L., Meulman P. A. Structure of quinomycin antibiotics. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1975 Apr;28(4):332–336. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.28.332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McGhee J. D., von Hippel P. H. Theoretical aspects of DNA-protein interactions: co-operative and non-co-operative binding of large ligands to a one-dimensional homogeneous lattice. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jun 25;86(2):469–489. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90031-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Müller W., Bünemann H., Dattagupta N. Interactions of heteroaromatic compounds with nucleic acids. 2. Influence of substituents on the base and sequence specificity of intercalating ligands. Eur J Biochem. 1975 May;54(1):279–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb04138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Müller W., Crothers D. M. Interactions of heteroaromatic compounds with nucleic acids. 1. The influence of heteroatoms and polarizability on the base specificity of intercalating ligands. Eur J Biochem. 1975 May;54(1):267–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb04137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Müller W., Gautier F. Interactions of heteroaromatic compounds with nucleic acids. A - T-specific non-intercalating DNA ligands. Eur J Biochem. 1975 Jun;54(2):385–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb04149.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Otsuka H., Shoji J., Kawano K., Kyogoku Y. Structure confirmation of triostin a by 1H and 13C magnetic resonance. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1976 Jan;29(1):107–110. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.29.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Otsuka H., Shoji J. The structure of Triostin C. Tetrahedron. 1965 Oct;21(10):2931–2938. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4020(01)98379-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pyeritz R. E., Schlegel R. A., Thomas C. A., Jr Hydrodynamic shear breakage of DNA may produce single-chained terminals. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Jul 31;272(4):504–509. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(72)90505-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reinert K. E. DNA stiffening and elongation caused by the binding of ethidium bromide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Aug 24;319(2):135–139. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(73)90004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. TUBBS R. K., DITMARS W. E., Jr, VANWINKLE Q. HETEROGENEITY OF THE INTERACTION OF DNA WITH ACRIFLAVINE. J Mol Biol. 1964 Aug;9:545–557. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80226-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ughetto G., Waring M. J. Conformation of the deoxyribonucleic acid-binding peptide antibiotic echinomycin based on energy calculations. Mol Pharmacol. 1977 May;13(3):579–584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wakelin S. P., Waring M. J. The binding of echinomycin to deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem J. 1976 Sep 1;157(3):721–740. doi: 10.1042/bj1570721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ward D. C., Reich E., Goldberg I. H. Base specificity in the interaction of polynucleotides with antibiotic drugs. Science. 1965 Sep 10;149(3689):1259–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3689.1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Waring M. J., Wakelin L. P. Echinomycin: a bifunctional intercalating antibiotic. Nature. 1974 Dec 20;252(5485):653–657. doi: 10.1038/252653a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Waring M. J., Wakelin L. P., Lee J. S. A solvent-partition method for measuring the binding of drugs to DNA. Application to the quinoxaline antibiotics echinomycin and triostin A. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Oct 1;407(2):200–212. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(75)90285-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Waring M., Makoff A. Breakdown of pulse-labeled ribonucleic acid and polysomes in Bacillus megaterium: actions of streptolydigin, echinomycin, and triostins. Mol Pharmacol. 1974 Mar;10(2):214–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Waring M. Variation of the supercoils in closed circular DNA by binding of antibiotics and drugs: evidence for molecular models involving intercalation. J Mol Biol. 1970 Dec 14;54(2):247–279. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90429-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wells R. D., Larson J. E., Grant R. C., Shortle B. E., Cantor C. R. Physicochemical studies on polydeoxyribonucleotides containing defined repeating nucleotide sequences. J Mol Biol. 1970 Dec 28;54(3):465–497. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90121-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES