Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1978 Nov 15;176(2):523–529. doi: 10.1042/bj1760523

The oestrogen receptor in the rat uterus in relation to intra-uterine devices and the oestrous cycle.

L Myatt, G Chaudhuri, M G Elder, L Lim
PMCID: PMC1186261  PMID: 570396

Abstract

We investigated the binding characteristics, content and intracellular distribution of nuclear and cytosolic oestrogen receptors in the uteri of rats bearing a unilateral intrauterine device, fitted 14--18 days earlier, at four phases of a 5-day oestrous cycle. The patterns of changes in wet weight and content of cytosolic and nuclear receptor that normally occur during the oestrous cycle were not altered by the presence of the device. At all stages of the cycle the intra-uterine-device-containing horn had a greater wet weight and a correspondingly higher content of cytosolic receptor than its contralateral control horn, the cellular concentration of cytosolic receptor being apparently maintained. However, the intra-uterine-device-containing horn had significantly lower cellular concentrations (i.e. per mg of DNA) of nuclear receptor, particularly at late dioestrus and pro-oestrus. Thus the treated horn showed a decreased translocation of receptor in response to increases in circulating oestrogens. Both horns contained equivalent amounts of an activating factor implicated in translocation and measured in vitro by binding of cytosol receptor to oligo(dT)-cellulose. The presence of an intra-uterine device neither altered the dissociation constants (Kd) of the nuclear and cytosolic oestrogen-receptor complexes nor the stability of the nuclear receptor complex in vitro. The decreased translocation cannot thus be directly attributed to changes in the physical properties of the receptor. This decrease may be responsible for the anti-fertility effect of the intra-uterine device (which affects only the treated horn of the bicornuate rat uterus), since implantation of the blastocyst requires correct concentrations of nuclear oestrogen receptor.

Full text

PDF
523

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J., Clark J. H., Peck E. J., Jr Oestrogen and nuclear binding sites. Determination of specific sites by ( 3 H)oestradiol exchange. Biochem J. 1972 Feb;126(3):561–567. doi: 10.1042/bj1260561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BURTON K. A study of the conditions and mechanism of the diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem J. 1956 Feb;62(2):315–323. doi: 10.1042/bj0620315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buller R. E., O'Malley B. W. The biology and mechanism of steroid hormone receptor interaction with the eukaryotic nucleus. Biochem Pharmacol. 1976 Jan;25(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(76)90164-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark J. H., Anderson J. N., Peck E. J., Jr Nuclear receptor-estrogen complexes of rat uteri: concentration-time-response parameters. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1973;36(0):15–59. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3237-4_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark J. H., Anderson J., Peck E. J., Jr Receptor-estrogen complex in the nuclear fraction of rat uterine cells during the estrous cycle. Science. 1972 May 5;176(4034):528–530. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4034.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Corfman P. A., Segal S. J. Biologic effects of intrauterine devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968 Feb 1;100(3):448–459. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)33713-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cullen B. M., Harkness R. D. Collagen formation and changes in cell population in the rat's uterus after distension with wax. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1968 Jan;53(1):33–42. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1968.sp001943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DOYLE L. L., MARGOLIS A. J. INTRAUTERINE FOREIGN BODY. I. EFFECT ON REPRODUCTIVE PROCESSES IN THE RAT. Fertil Steril. 1964 Nov-Dec;15:597–606. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)35404-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feherty P., Robertson D. M., Waynforth H. B., Kellie A. E. Changes in the concentration of high-affinity oestradiol receptor in rat uterine supernatant preparations during the oestrous ycle, pseudopregnancy, pregnancy, maturation and after ovariectomy. Biochem J. 1970 Dec;120(4):837–844. doi: 10.1042/bj1200837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ginsburg M., Greenstein B. D., MacLusky N. J., Morris I. D., Thomas P. J. An improved method for the study of high-affinity steroid binding:-oestradiol binding in brain and pituitary. Steroids. 1974 Jun;23(6):773–792. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(74)90053-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heald P. J. Biochemical aspects of implantation. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1976 Oct;(25):29–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Labhsetwar A. P., Perser N. Uterine uptake of (6,7- 3 H) oestradiol in the presence of intrauterine contraceptive device in cyclic and pregnant rats. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1972 Mar;69(3):583–588. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0690583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee C., Jacobson H. I. Uterine estrogen receptor in rats during pubescence and the estrous cycle. Endocrinology. 1971 Mar;88(3):596–601. doi: 10.1210/endo-88-3-596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lyttle C. R., DeSombre E. R. Generality of oestrogen stimulation of peroxidase activity in growth responsive tissues. Nature. 1977 Jul 28;268(5618):337–339. doi: 10.1038/268337a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Martel D., Psychoyos A. Endometrial content of nuclear estrogen receptor and receptivity for ovoimplantation in the rat. Endocrinology. 1976 Aug;99(2):470–475. doi: 10.1210/endo-99-2-470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Naftolin F., Brown-Grant K., Corker C. S. Plasma and pituitary luteinizing hormone and peripheral plasma oestradiol concentrations in the normal oestrous cycle of the rat and after experimental manipulation of the cycle. J Endocrinol. 1972 Apr;53(1):17–30. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0530017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. O'Malley B. W., Means A. R. Female steroid hormones and target cell nuclei. Science. 1974 Feb 15;183(4125):610–620. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4125.610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Parr E. L., Segal S. J. The effect of an intrauterine contraceptive device on the weight of the rat uterus. Fertil Steril. 1966 Sep-Oct;17(5):648–653. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)36066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stock L., Ledger W. J., Campbell C. Effect of estrogen deprivation on the rat's uterine reaction to a nylon suture. Fertil Steril. 1968 Jul-Aug;19(4):644–648. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)36740-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thrower S., Hall C., Lim L., Davison A. N. The selective isolation of the uterine oestradiol-receptor complex by binding to oligo(dT)-cellulose. The mediation of an essential activator in the transformation of cytosol receptor. Biochem J. 1976 Nov 15;160(2):271–280. doi: 10.1042/bj1600271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. White J. O., Thrower S., Lim L. Intracellular relationships of the oestrogen receptor in the rat uterus and hypothalamus during the oestrous cycle. Biochem J. 1978 Apr 15;172(1):37–47. doi: 10.1042/bj1720037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Williams D. L., Gorski J. Association behaviour of the oestradiol-binding protein complex with the nuclear fraction. Acta Endocrinol Suppl (Copenh) 1972;168:420–438. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.071s420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES