Skip to main content
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology logoLink to Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
. 2025 Feb 26;10(1):e70107. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70107

Hypoalbuminemia and Postoperative Outcomes Following Major Salivary Gland Resection

Praneet C Kaki 1,, Aman M Patel 2,, Jason A Brant 3, Steven B Cannady 4, Karthik Rajasekaran 3,4, Robert M Brody 4,5, Ryan M Carey 4,5
PMCID: PMC11863205  PMID: 40012621

ABSTRACT

Objective

Hypoalbuminemia (HA) is a proxy for malnutrition that has been associated with postoperative complications in several surgical subspecialties. This study investigates the association between pre‐operative HA and complications following major salivary gland (MSG) resection.

Methods

Patients undergoing outpatient, elective MSG resection were extracted from the 2005 to 2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Demographics and comorbidities were compared between HA (preoperative serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL) and non‐HA cohorts. To determine associations between albumin status and postoperative complications, univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 5774 patients undergoing MSG resection were included, of which 321 (5.6%) had preoperative HA. HA was associated with older age on univariate analysis (65.2 vs. 60.2 years, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis found HA to be independently associated with any surgical complication (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.09–3.56, p = 0.019) and length of stay (LOS) ≥ 90th percentile (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.04–2.38, p = 0.032).

Conclusion

Preoperative HA may be a poor prognostic factor associated with an increased risk of surgical complications and prolonged LOS among patients undergoing MSG resection.

Level of Evidence

4.

Keywords: ACS‐NSQIP, head and neck surgery, hypoalbuminemia, major salivary gland, nutrition


Hypoalbuminemia has been associated with short‐term postoperative complications across various surgical subspecialties, including H&N cancer surgery. Our analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS‐NSQIP) suggests that preoperative HA is a poor prognostic factor associated with an increased risk of surgical complications and prolonged LOS among patients undergoing MSG resection.

graphic file with name LIO2-10-e70107-g003.jpg

1. Introduction

Pathologies of the major salivary glands (MSGs) span chronic inflammatory, infectious, neoplastic, and obstructive etiologies [1] and may be treated with surgical resection [1, 2, 3, 4]. MSG resections are considered relatively safe procedures, but have been associated with postoperative complications, including facial nerve or other nerve injuries, altered sensation, hematoma, Frey's syndrome, salivary fistula, sialocele, infection, skin necrosis, and poor cosmesis [5, 6, 7].

Although malnutrition in surgical patients can be screened with a variety of methods, it is grossly underdiagnosed [8]. Serum albumin levels are frequently used as a surrogate marker to evaluate nutritional status, with hypoalbuminemia (HA), classified as < 3.5 g/dL, suggesting malnutrition [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Hypoalbuminemia has been associated with postoperative complications following elective bariatric surgery, hip arthroplasty, total joint arthroplasty, metastatic spinal disease surgery, and operative repair of peptic ulcer disease [8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16]. HA has also been frequently correlated with poor postoperative outcomes following head and neck (H&N) surgeries such as thyroidectomy, glossectomy, parathyroidectomy, and microvascular free flap reconstruction [17, 18, 19, 20]. In fact, an analysis of head and neck cancer surgeries utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS‐NSQIP) database associated HA with intensive care unit‐level complications, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and adverse discharge disposition; this prior study excluded patients with salivary malignancy [21].

Albumin levels can be used by surgeons to preoperatively screen for malnutrition, but to our knowledge, the relationship between HA and complications following MSG resection has yet to be evaluated with a large, nationally representative cohort. The objective of this study was to evaluate postoperative complications following MSG resection in patients with and without preoperative HA using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS‐NSQIP).

2. Methods

2.1. Data Source

We queried the 2005–2020 ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), a nationally validated database for data on surgical procedures and 30‐day perioperative data collected from > 700 community and academic hospitals in the United States. As the ACS‐NSQIP includes de‐identified patient data, this study did not require approval from the Institutional Review Boards at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

Cases were identified with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for parotidectomy (42415, 42410, 42420, 42425, and 42426), submandibular gland resection (42440), and sublingual gland resection (42450). Patients were excluded if they underwent non‐elective or emergent MSG resection, had missing preoperative albumin, had an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Classification of V, or had preoperative sepsis or shock.

2.3. Variables

Albumin levels documented in the ACS‐NSQIP were measured < 30 days before the procedure; hypoalbuminemia was defined as serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL. A total of 19442 patients undergoing outpatient, elective MSG resection in the ACS‐NSQIP, 13,647 had unknown albumin level and were excluded from analysis.

Demographics including age (< 50, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, and ≥ 80 years), race (White, Black or African American, or other), and sex were analyzed. This study also considered comorbidities and clinical factors such as obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 30), hypertension requiring medication, recent smoking history, diabetes mellitus, primary major salivary gland cancer (MSGC), dyspnea at rest or on exertion, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, steroid use, disseminated cancer, bleeding disorders, contaminated wound, poor functional status (partially dependent or totally dependent), preoperative wound infection (defined in the ACS‐NSQIP as “preoperative evidence of a documented open wound at the time of the principal operative procedure, defined as a breach in the integrity of the skin or separation of skin edges and includes open surgical wounds, with or without cellulitis or purulent exudate,”) preoperative weight loss of ≥ 10% body weight within 6 months prior to surgery, current dialysis, congestive heart failure, history of previous cardiac surgery, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, and admission status (inpatient or outpatient). ASA Classification (I–IV) was used as a surrogate for disease severity. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th (ICD‐9) and 10th (ICD‐10) editions were used to identify cancer of the parotid (142.0 and C07), submandibular (142.1 and C08.0), and sublingual (142.0 and C08.1) glands. The following CPT codes were used to define concurrent neck dissection: 42426, 38542, 38700, 38720, and 38724.

The primary endpoints in this study were postoperative complications, of which surgical complications included surgical site infections (superficial incisional, deep incisional, and organ space), graft failure, blood transfusions (≥ 1‐unit RBCs within 72 h post‐surgery), and wound disruptions/dehiscence within 30 days following operation; medical complications included mechanical ventilation > 48 h, re‐intubation, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction (MI), peripheral nerve injury, cerebrovascular accident, deep vein thrombosis, and sepsis/septic shock. Unplanned readmissions, re‐operations, and length of stay (LOS) were also analyzed. Prolonged operative time and LOS were defined as ≥ 90th percentile (90th percentile of operative time: 266 min, 90th percentile of LOS: 2 days).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Univariate analysis using Pearson chi‐square analysis and Fisher exact tests (following exclusion of patients with missing data for specific comorbidities) was conducted to compare rates of demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative complications in patients with and without HA. Determination of percentages in chi square analysis only considered known values, accounting for variability across categorial variables. Demographics and comorbidities significantly associated with HA were included as covariates in the multivariable binary logistic regression models with postoperative complications as outcomes. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals were calculated. Comorbidities in the ACS‐NSQIP with low incidence in our cohort (N < 15) were omitted from analysis (alcohol consumption, ventilator dependence, past pneumonia, ascites, esophageal varices, history of MI, angina, peripheral vascular disease, rest pain, acute renal failure, impaired sensorium, coma, hemiplegia, prior transient ischemic attack, prior cerebrovascular accident, CNS tumor, paraplegia, quadriplegia, pre‐op blood transfusion, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, systemic sepsis, prior operation within 30 days, and emergency case). A sensitivity analysis adjusting for HA as a continuous variable was performed to evaluate the impact of incremental increases in albumin on surgical outcomes. A secondary sensitivity analysis was performed to compare demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications between patients who did and did not have preoperative albumin levels documented in the ACS‐NSQIP. Statistical significance was set to p < 0.05. R Studio Version 2023.03.1 was used to conduct all statistical analyses.

3. Results

A total of 5774 patients undergoing MSG resection were included in this analysis, of which 5.56% (N = 321) had preoperative HA (Table 1). The average preoperative albumin level was 4.14 g/dL (SD = 0.43; Figure 1). 4885 (85%) patients underwent parotid gland resection, 856 (15%) underwent submandibular gland resection, and 33 (0.6%) underwent sublingual gland resection. The mean patient age was 60.4 years (SD = 14.4) across the whole cohort, 65.2 (SD = 13.6) among patients with HA, and 60.2 (SD = 14.4) years among patients without HA, respectively (p < 0.001; Figure 2). Patients with and without HA had significant differences in age (p < 0.001), ASA class (p < 0.001), and BMI (p < 0.002). HA was significantly associated with hypertension medication use (p = 0.021), diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), concurrent neck dissection (p = 0.010), dyspnea (p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (p < 0.001), steroid use (p = 0.013), disseminated cancer (p < 0.001), wound classification (p = 0.008), poor functional status (p < 0.001), wound infection (p < 0.001), weight loss (p = 0.002), and dialysis (p < 0.001). Median operative time was 124 min (IQR 83–184) median and LOS was 1 day (IQR 0–1) across the cohort.

TABLE 1.

Univariate analysis comparing demographics and comorbidities of patients with and without HA undergoing MSG resection.

Characteristic N Overall N = 5774 a Hypoalbuminemia N = 321 a Normoalbuminemia N = 5453 a p b
Sex 5773 0.015
Female 2727 (47%) 139 (43%) 2588 (47%)
Male 3046 (53%) 181 (56%) 2865 (53%)
Age 5774 < 0.001
< 50 1205 (21%) 42 (13%) 1163 (21%)
50–59 1296 (22%) 59 (18%) 1237 (23%)
60–69 1628 (28%) 89 (28%) 1539 (28%)
70–79 1135 (20%) 75 (23%) 1060 (19%)
≥ 80 510 (8.8%) 56 (17%) 454 (8.3%)
Race 5774 0.4
Black or African American 515 (8.9%) 35 (11%) 480 (8.8%)
Other 988 (17%) 54 (17%) 934 (17%)
White 4271 (74%) 232 (72%) 4039 (74%)
ASA class 5769 < 0.001
1‐No disturbance 288 (5.0%) 6 (1.9%) 282 (5.2%)
2‐Mild disturbance 2546 (44%) 69 (21%) 2477 (45%)
3‐Severe disturbance 2755 (48%) 214 (67%) 2541 (47%)
4‐Life threatening 180 (3.1%) 32 (10.0%) 148 (2.7%)
Body mass index levels 5774 < 0.001
0 (< 18.5) 88 (1.5%) 12 (3.7%) 76 (1.4%)
1 (18.5–24.9) 1216 (21%) 66 (21%) 1150 (21%)
2 (25.0–29.9) 1959 (34%) 100 (31%) 1859 (34%)
3 (30.0–34.9) 1349 (23%) 55 (17%) 1294 (24%)
4 (35.0–39.9) 670 (12%) 43 (13%) 627 (11%)
5 (≥ 40) 492 (8.5%) 45 (14%) 447 (8.2%)
Admission status 5774 < 0.001
Inpatient 1700 (29%) 125 (39%) 1575 (29%)
Outpatient 4074 (71%) 196 (61%) 3878 (71%)
Location of resection 5774 0.5
Parotid 4885 (85%) 274 (85%) 4611 (85%)
Sublingual 33 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 33 (0.6%)
Submandibular 856 (15%) 47 (15%) 809 (15%)
Concurrent neck dissection 5774 707 (12%) 54 (17%) 653 (12%) 0.010
Comorbidities
Obesity 5774 2511 (43%) 143 (45%) 2368 (43%) 0.7
Hypertension medication use 4570 2372 (52%) 143 (59%) 2229 (52%) 0.021
Cigarettes 5774 1431 (25%) 87 (27%) 1344 (25%) 0.3
Diabetes mellitus 5774 1150 (20%) 89 (28%) 1061 (19%) < 0.001
Primary MSG cancer 5774 687 (12%) 42 (13%) 645 (12%) 0.5
Dyspnea 5774 361 (6.3%) 43 (13%) 318 (5.8%) < 0.001
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 5774 322 (5.6%) 37 (12%) 285 (5.2%) < 0.001
Steroid use 5774 254 (4.4%) 23 (7.2%) 231 (4.2%) 0.013
Disseminated cancer 5774 172 (3.0%) 20 (6.2%) 152 (2.8%) < 0.001
Bleeding disorder 5774 166 (2.9%) 14 (4.4%) 152 (2.8%) 0.10
Contaminated wound 4682 120 (2.6%) 13 (5.1%) 107 (2.4%) 0.008
Poor functional status 5745 74 (1.3%) 17 (5.3%) 57 (1.1%)  0.001
Wound infection 5774 47 (0.8%) 9 (2.8%) 38 (0.7%) < 0.001
Weight loss 5774 33 (0.6%) 7 (2.2%) 26 (0.5%) 0.002
Dialysis 5774 29 (0.5%) 13 (4.0%) 16 (0.3%) < 0.001
Congestive heart failure 5774 25 (0.4%) 3 (0.9%) 22 (0.4%) 0.2
Previous cardiac surgery 371 23 (6.2%) 4 (14%) 19 (5.5%) 0.084
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention 371 21 (5.7%) 2 (7.1%) 19 (5.5%) 0.7

Note: Bold values are statistically significant (p  < 0.05).

a

n (%).

b

Fisher's exact test; Pearson's Chi‐squared test.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Distribution of preoperative albumin levels.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Frequency of hypoalbuminemia by patient age.

Patients with HA had higher rates of surgical complication (7.2% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), deep surgical site infection (1.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.022), blood transfusions (2.8% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.008), any medical complication (3.4% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.016), pneumonia (2.2% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation > 48 h (0.9% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.020), any complication (10.0% vs. 4.6%, p < 0.001), LOS ≥ 90th percentile (32% vs. 19%, p < 0.001), unplanned readmission (100% vs. 79%, p = 0.043), and discharge not to home (3.7% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). Rates of all complications across both cohorts are detailed in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Univariate analysis comparing rates of postoperative complications in patients with and without HA.

Characteristic Overall N = 5774 a Hypoalbuminemia N = 321 a Normoalbuminemia N = 5453 a p b
Any surgical complication 211 (3.7%) 23 (7.2%) 188 (3.4%) < 0.001
Superficial SSI 106 (1.8%) 8 (2.5%) 98 (1.8%) 0.4
Deep SSI 20 (0.3%) 4 (1.2%) 16 (0.3%) 0.022
Organ space SSI 17 (0.3%) 2 (0.6%) 15 (0.3%) 0.2
Wound dehiscence 22 (0.4%) 3 (0.9%) 19 (0.3%) 0.12
Blood transfusion 63 (1.1%) 9 (2.8%) 54 (1.0%) 0.008
Graft failure 2 (0.2%) 0 (0%) 2 (0.2%) > 0.9
Any medical complication 89 (1.5%) 11 (3.4%) 78 (1.4%) 0.016
Pneumonia 27 (0.5%) 7 (2.2%) 20 (0.4%) < 0.001
Re‐intubation 20 (0.3%) 3 (0.9%) 17 (0.3%) 0.10
Pulmonary embolism 6 (0.1%) 0 (0%) 6 (0.1%) > 0.9
Ventilation > 48 h 11 (0.2%) 3 (0.9%) 8 (0.1%) 0.020
Renal insufficiency 3 (< 0.1%) 0 (0%) 3 (< 0.1%) > 0.9
Acute renal failure 3 (< 0.1%) 1 (0.3%) 2 (< 0.1%) 0.2
Urinary tract infection 12 (0.2%) 2 (0.6%) 10 (0.2%) 0.14
Cerebrovascular accident 14 (0.2%) 0 (0%) 14 (0.3%) > 0.9
Peripheral nerve injury 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Cardiac arrest 5 (< 0.1%) 1 (0.3%) 4 (< 0.1%) 0.2
Myocardial infarction 9 (0.2%) 2 (0.6%) 7 (0.1%) 0.086
Deep vein thrombosis 9 (0.2%) 2 (0.6%) 7 (0.1%) 0.086
Sepsis 9 (0.2%) 0 (0%) 9 (0.2%) > 0.9
Septic shock 5 (< 0.1%) 1 (0.3%) 4 (< 0.1%) 0.2
Coma 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Any complication 282 (4.9%) 32 (10.0%) 250 (4.6%) < 0.001
Prolonged Op time 580 (10%) 36 (11%) 544 (10.0%) 0.5
Prolonged LOS 1114 (19%) 103 (32%) 1011 (19%) < 0.001
Unplanned readmission 130 (81%) 16 (100%) 114 (79%) 0.043
Re‐operation 130 (2.3%) 9 (2.8%) 121 (2.2%) 0.5
Discharge not to home 76 (1.3%) 12 (3.7%) 64 (1.2%) < 0.001

Note: Bolded complications indicate infectious etiology. Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

a

n (%).

b

Pearson's Chi‐squared test; Fisher's exact test.

On multivariable analysis, following adjustment for demographics and comorbidities significantly associated with HA on univariable analysis, HA was independently associated with surgical complications (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.09–3.56, p = 0.019; Table 3) and prolonged LOS (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.04–2.38, p = 0.032). Hypoalbuminemia was not significantly associated with any medical complication (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.45–2.74, p = 0.7; Table 4), prolonged operative time (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.43–1.29, p = 0.3), re‐operation (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.34–2.09, p = 0.9), and discharge not to home (OR 1.89, 95% CI 0.78–4.10, p = 0.13) on multivariable analysis (Table 5). Neck dissection (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.94–4.74, p < 0.001), contaminated wound (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.19–5.66, p = 0.011), and wound infection (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.40–9.57, p = 0.005) remained associated with experiencing any surgical complication. Male sex (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.19–4.76, p = 0.018), ≥ 80+ years of age (OR 5.23, 95% CI 1.69–20.1, p = 0.007), outpatient status (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.64, p < 0.001), and wound infection (OR 6.82, 95% CI 1.94–21.1, p = 0.001) remained associated with experiencing any medical complication.

TABLE 3.

Multivariable binary logistic regression models identifying factors associated with any surgical complication following MSG resection.

Predictors of any surgical complications OR a 95% CI a p
Sex
Female
Male 1.41 0.93, 2.15 0.11
Age
< 50
50–59 1.10 0.59, 2.11 0.8
60–69 0.57 0.29, 1.14 0.10
70–79 0.74 0.37, 1.49 0.4
≥ 80 0.60 0.27, 1.33 0.2
ASA classification
1‐No disturbance
2‐Mild disturbance 1.11 0.38, 4.77 0.9
3‐Severe disturbance 1.76 0.58, 7.66 0.4
4‐Life threatening 2.95 0.76, 14.7 0.14
Body mass index levels
0 (< 18.5) 1.36 0.29, 4.48 0.7
1 (18.5–24.9)
2 (25.0–29.9) 1.12 0.67, 1.93 0.7
3 (30.0–34.9) 0.92 0.52, 1.66 0.8
4 (35.0–39.9) 0.70 0.32, 1.47 0.4
5 (≥ 40) 0.87 0.37, 1.90 0.7
Admission status
Inpatient
Outpatient 0.67 0.44, 1.01 0.053
Hypoalbuminemia 2.03 1.09, 3.56 0.019
Concurrent neck dissection 3.05 1.94, 4.74 < 0.001
Comorbidities
Hypertension medication use 1.32 0.85, 2.07 0.2
Diabetes mellitus 0.86 0.52, 1.39 0.6
Dyspnea 1.51 0.78, 2.77 0.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1.87 0.97, 3.42 0.052
Steroid use 1.40 0.65, 2.75 0.4
Disseminated cancer 1.71 0.79, 3.36 0.14
Contaminated wound 2.73 1.19, 5.66 0.011
Poor functional status 0.62 0.09, 2.34 0.5
Wound infection 3.85 1.40, 9.57 0.005
Weight loss 1.26 0.17, 5.80 0.8
Dialysis 0.74 0.04, 4.23 0.8

Note: Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

a

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

TABLE 4.

Multivariable binary logistic regression models identifying factors associated with any medical complication following MSG resection.

Predictors of any medical complications OR a 95% CI a p
Sex
Female
Male 2.30 1.19, 4.76 0.018
Age
< 50
50–59 0.86 0.24, 3.49 0.8
60–69 0.65 0.18, 2.66 0.5
70–79 2.00 0.65, 7.58 0.3
≥ 80 5.23 1.69, 20.1 0.007
ASA classification
1‐No disturbance
2‐Mild disturbance Inf 0‐Inf > 0.9
3‐Severe disturbance Inf 0‐Inf > 0.9
4‐Life threatening Inf 0‐Inf > 0.9
Body mass index levels
0 (< 18.5) 0.81 0.04, 5.30 0.9
1 (18.5–24.9)
2 (25.0–29.9) 1.02 0.47, 2.30 > 0.9
3 (30.0–34.9) 0.81 0.33, 2.00 0.6
4 (35.0–39.9) 1.57 0.56, 4.23 0.4
5 (≥ 40) 1.72 0.49, 5.40 0.4
Admission status
Inpatient
Outpatient 0.35 0.19, 0.64 < 0.001
Hypoalbuminemia 1.19 0.45, 2.74 0.7
Concurrent neck dissection 1.01 0.51, 1.93 > 0.9
Comorbidities
Hypertension medication use 1.00 0.53, 1.96 > 0.9
Diabetes mellitus 1.10 0.55, 2.13 0.8
Dyspnea 1.03 0.37, 2.49 > 0.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1.28 0.48, 3.00 0.6
Steroid use 1.28 0.36, 3.48 0.7
Disseminated cancer 1.81 0.64, 4.37 0.2
Contaminated wound 1.72 0.40, 5.42 0.4
Poor functional status 2.85 0.76, 8.45 0.081
Wound infection 6.82 1.94, 21.1 0.001
Weight loss 1.02 0.04, 9.14 > 0.9
Dialysis 0.00 > 0.9

Note: Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

a

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

TABLE 5.

Multivariable binary logistic regression models of the association between hypoalbuminemia and adverse postoperative outcomes following MSG resection.

Complication OR a 95% CI a p
Prolonged Op‐time 0.76 0.43, 1.29 0.3
Prolonged LOS 1.58 1.04, 2.38 0.032
Re‐operation 0.92 0.34, 2.09 0.9
Discharge not home 1.89 0.78, 4.10 0.13

Note: Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

a

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

Table 6 compares rates of any medical or surgical complication by age and comorbidity status. Across age groups, patients between 70 and 79 years had the highest incidence of any complication (i.e., medical or surgical) (6.2%). Rates of any complication was highest among patients with preoperative wound infection (32%), poor functional status (20%), and dialysis (17%).

TABLE 6.

Rates of any medical or surgical complication by age and comorbidity status, n (%).

Characteristic N Overall Hypoalbuminemia Normoalbuminemia p a
Age
< 50 1205 42 (3.5%) 4 (9.5%) 38 (3.3%) 0.055
50–59 1296 53 (4.1%) 4 (6.8%) 49 (4.0%) 0.3
60–69 1628 57 (3.5%) 7 (7.9%) 50 (3.2%) 0.033
70–79 1135 70 (6.2%) 9 (12%) 61 (5.8%) 0.043
≥ 80 510 60 (12%) 8 (14%) 52 (11%) 0.5
Concurrent neck dissection 707 96 (14%) 5 (9.3%) 91 (14%) 0.3
Comorbidities 687 47 (6.8%) 7 (17%) 40 (6.2%) 0.019
Obesity 2511 118 (4.7%) 14 (9.8%) 104 (4.4%) 0.003
Hypertension medication use 2372 137 (5.8%) 19 (13%) 118 (5.3%) < 0.001
Cigarettes 1431 76 (5.3%) 13 (15%) 63 (4.7%) < 0.001
Diabetes mellitus 1150 77 (6.7%) 9 (10%) 68 (6.4%) 0.2
Primary MSG cancer 423 423 (7.3%) 28 (8.7%) 395 (7.2%) 0.3
Dyspnea 361 34 (9.4%) 6 (14%) 28 (8.8%) 0.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 322 28 (8.7%) 6 (16%) 22 (7.7%) 0.11
Steroid use 254 23 (9.1%) 5 (22%) 18 (7.8%) 0.043
Disseminated cancer 172 20 (12%) 3 (15%) 17 (11%) 0.7
Bleeding disorder 166 23 (14%) 1 (7.1%) 22 (14%) 0.7
Contaminated wound 120 18 (15%) 0 (0%) 18 (17%) 0.2
Poor functional status 72 15 (20%) 3 (18%) 12 (21%) > 0.9
Wound infection 47 15 (32%) 0 (0%) 15 (39%) 0.041
Weight loss 33 4 (12%) 0 (0%) 4 (15%) 0.6
Dialysis 29 5 (17%) 5 (38%) 0 (0%) 0.011
Congestive heart failure 25 4 (16%) 0 (0%) 4 (18%) > 0.9
Previous cardiac surgery 23 1 (4.3%) 0 (0%) 1 (5.3%) > 0.9
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention 21 2 (9.5%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) > 0.9

Note: Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

a

Fisher's exact test; Pearson's Chi‐squared test.

3.1. Hypoalbuminemia Sensitivity Analyses

Sensitivity analysis adjusting for HA as a continuous variable on multivariable analysis, also adjusting for demographics and comorbidities significantly associated on univariate analysis, are shown in Supplemental Tables S1–S3. Pre‐operative serum albumin remained significantly associated with any surgical complication (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43–0.98, p = 0.034). There was no association between preoperative albumin and any medical complication (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.49–1.76, p = 0.8), prolonged operative time (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.99–1.84, p = 0.061), prolonged LOS (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65–1.08, p = 0.2), re‐operation (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.42–1.28, p = 0.3), and discharge not to home (OR 0.662, 95% CI 0.33–1.18, p = 0.14).

Tables S4, S5 compare demographics and comorbidities and postoperative complications between patients with known and unknown preoperative albumin levels, respectively. Patients with known preoperative albumin levels had higher rates of various preoperative comorbidities including obesity (p < 0.001), hypertension medication use (p < 0.001), cigarette use (p = 0.006), diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), primary MSG cancer (p = 0.003), dyspnea (p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.001), steroid use (p < 0.001), disseminated cancer (p < 0.001), bleeding disorder (p < 0.001), preoperative contaminated wound (p = 0.033), poor functional status (p < 0.001), preoperative weight loss (p = 0.012), dialysis use (p = 0.032), congestive heart failure (p = 0.011), previous cardiac surgery (p = 0.012), and previous percutaneous coronary intervention (p = 0.045). Rates of preoperative wound infection were similar between groups. Patients with known preoperative albumin levels had higher rates of postoperative complications including any surgical complication, any medical complication, any complication (i.e., medical or surgical), prolonged operative time, prolonged LOS, re‐operation, and non‐home discharge (p < 0.01). Rates of superficial SSI, deep SSI, organ space SSI, wound dehiscence, graft failure, pulmonary embolism, ventilator dependence, renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, and unplanned readmissions were similar.

4. Discussion

Previous studies have associated HA with adverse surgical outcomes following H&N surgery (i.e., thyroidectomy, glossectomy, parathyroidectomy, and microvascular free flap reconstruction) and across other surgical procedures such as pancreaticoduodenectomy, bariatric surgery, hip arthroplasty, total joint arthroplasty, lower extremity orthopedic trauma surgery, metastatic spinal disease surgery, and operative repair of peptic ulcer [8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26]. Moreover, HA has been associated with poor prognosis in hospitalized patients regardless of treatment and increased morbidity and mortality following surgery [27, 28]. In this study, we utilized the ACS‐NSQIP to investigate the association between HA and postoperative complications following MSG resection. Preoperative HA was found to be independently associated with any surgical complication and prolonged LOS following adjustment for demographics and related comorbidities.

Because of its association with bioavailable protein energy and inflammation, albumin levels offer a viable measure of nutrition [29, 30]. Although HA is reported in up to 50% of admitted patients and our study identifying a correlation with inpatient status, this finding was present in only 5.56% of our cohort. We also observed increasing incidence of HA with older age, consistent with other studies [8, 31, 32]. Moreover, the lack of association between HA and race is not surprising given the mixed findings in the existing literature and the lack of consensus on which racial groups might be at risk for HA [33, 34]. Malnutrition has a multifaceted and complex etiology, as evidenced by our observation of various comorbidities being linked to HA, consistent with findings from previous studies [12, 16, 35]. Beyond malnutrition, HA also indicates inflammation, which has been associated with poor responses to surgical and medical treatments, diminished quality of life, and reduced longevity [36, 37]. An ACS‐NSQIP analysis of 65,192 patients undergoing outpatient procedures across all surgical specialties identified HA as the most significant predictor of 30‐day mortality, along with infection, major complications, and readmission [38]. Moreover, previous studies have elucidated the effect of HA within H&N surgery, but excluded patients with MSG cancer. In one such study, patients with HA had poorer overall survival, higher rates of wound infection, and increased risk of ICU‐level complications [21, 39]. HA has also been linked to wound dehiscence in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma, increased mortality in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, and increased complications following H&N free flap reconstruction [20, 30, 40].

Our analysis found that patients with HA were more than twice as likely to experience surgical complications (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.09–3.56) compared with non‐HA patients following MSG resection. This finding is consistent with prior studies across various surgical specialties. HA was associated with a significantly increased risk of wound infections following surgery for oral cavity cancer. However, this study assessed postoperative hypoalbuminemia, which could be a result of infection, and used a more stringent cutoff of ≤ 2.8 g/dL to define HA [41]. A similar study identified early postoperative hypoalbuminemia < 2.5 g/dL as a significant risk factor for increased SSIs following oral cancer surgery [18]. Other studies have found preoperative HA to be associated with SSI following total joint arthroplasty, surgical wound dehiscence following posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and wound infection in H&N cancer surgery [21, 41, 42]. As a marker of inflammation, HA can indicate impaired immune function that impairs the wound‐healing process, especially in the post‐operative environment characterized by high physiological stress [36, 43, 44, 45].

In our study, there was, however, a lack of association between HA and medical complications. These mixed findings in our study are similar to an existing report on transcervical Zenker diverticulectomy that found no associations between HA and mortality, any medical complication, and LOS [35]. Another study of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenctomy found no differences between complications and 30‐day mortality with and without postoperative HA [46]. Likewise, preoperative HA was not associated with 30‐day overall complications, surgical complications, medical complications, or mortality following surgery for the treatment of pressure ulcers [47].

Our study also found that HA was not significantly associated with non‐home discharge. This contrasts with previous studies of H&N surgery and pancreaticoduodenectomy, which found HA to be associated with non‐home discharge [21, 48]. Of note, our selection criteria for outpatient, elective cases may have contributed to a selection bias accounting for our observed lack of association between HA and non‐home discharge. In addition, MSG resection is a generally safe procedure with a high proportion of patients having same‐day discharge, overnight observation, or short hospitalization. Studies of HA in several other otolaryngology procedures did not analyze non‐home discharge, limiting our ability to draw additional comparisons.

Our results indicate that patients with HA were more likely to experience prolonged LOS (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.43–2.38) compared with non‐HA patients following MSG resection. This finding is similar to that of a study from Khawaja et al. which identified that patients with HA were nearly five times as likely to experience prolonged LOS than non‐HA patients following parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism [19]. Moghadamyeghaneh et al. reported a two‐fold increase in prolonged hospitalization following colorectal surgery in patients with HA [49]. Extended hospital care was more likely in patients with HA undergoing open repair of the rotator cuff per Quan et al. [50] Low serum albumin was also associated with increased LOS in the management of acute surgical site infection following spinal surgery [51]. As suggested by previous studies, low serum albumin can serve as a surrogate marker for malnutrition, which has been linked to increased frailty, susceptibility to illness, and impaired healing [52, 53]. This could be an underlying mechanism potentially driving the observed relationship between HA and prolonged LOS.

The findings of this study should be considered in light of several limitations. ACS‐NSQIP collects data from numerous institutions, which may affect the accuracy and consistency of data. Although surgical outcomes were assessed while adjusting for significant demographics and comorbidities when assessing surgical outcomes, other relevant factors such as disease severity and tumor characteristics were not reported in ACS‐NSQIP. Given their relative infrequency, complications were also grouped into broader categories (i.e., medical or surgical) as validated by previous studies using the ACS‐NSQIP database. Complications were also addressed as binary outcomes, and multiple hypothesis testing was not implemented as comparisons were not made between more than two cohorts. Moreover, there may be an inherent selection bias for patients requiring preoperative nutritional screening in our study due to the exclusion of patients without known preoperative albumin. This limits the generalizability of our study to patients who were specifically indicated for nutritional screening, who evidently had greater rates of comorbidities and postsurgical complications compared to those with undocumented albumin levels. Likewise, there is a lack of data on postoperative nutritional management in ACS‐NSQIP, thus we were unable to assess potential therapeutic value of managing preoperative HA. The retrospective design of our study limits any interpretation to correlation, not causation. Although the exclusion of comorbidities with incidence < 15 streamlined our patient sample and analysis, these may still be present in a real patient population. ACS‐NSQIP is limited to 30‐day postoperative outcomes, limiting the scope of this study to this short time frame and not long‐term outcomes.

5. Conclusion

The minority of patients undergoing MSG resection had HA. Preoperative HA is a poor prognostic factor associated with an increased risk of surgical complications and prolonged LOS among patients undergoing MSG resection. The adverse outcomes in patients with HA are consistent with existing literature identifying HA as a risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes across several surgical specialties. Our findings suggest a potential benefit of optimizing albumin levels and nutritional status prior to pursuing outpatient, elective MSG resection.

Supporting information

Table S1. Multivariable binary logistic regression models identifying factors associated with any surgical complication following MSG resection adjusting for hypoalbuminemia as a continuous variable.

Table S2. Multivariable binary logistic regression models identifying factors associated with any medical complication following MSG resection adjusting for hypoalbuminemia as a continuous variable.

Table S3. Multivariable binary logistic regression models of the association between hypoalbuminemia and adverse postoperative outcomes following MSG resection adjusting for hypoalbuminemia as a continuous variable.

Table S4. Univariate analysis of demographics and comorbidities of patients undergoing MSGC resection stratified by patients with and without known preoperative albumin levels.

Table S5. Univariate analysis of rates of operative/post‐operative complications stratified by patients with and without known preoperative albumin levels.

LIO2-10-e70107-s001.docx (38.8KB, docx)

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Contributor Information

Praneet C. Kaki, Email: praneet.kaki@jefferson.edu.

Aman M. Patel, Email: amp495@njms.rutgers.edu.

References

  • 1. Hsu A. K. and Kutler D. I., “Indications, Techniques, and Complications of Major Salivary Gland Extirpation,” Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics 21, no. 3 (2009): 313–321, 10.1016/j.coms.2009.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kucharska E., Rzepakowska A., Cieślik M., et al., “Indications for Surgical Treatment of Major Salivary Glands Pathologies With Epidemiology Analysis in Adults—Cohort Study of 1173 Cases,” Polish Otolaryngology/Otolaryngologia Polska 76, no. 4 (2022): 1–5, 10.5604/01.3001.0015.8056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. El Sayed A. Y. and Winters R., “Parotidectomy,” in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2024), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557651/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Beahm D. D., Peleaz L., Nuss D. W., et al., “Surgical Approaches to the Submandibular Gland: A Review of Literature,” International Journal of Surgery 7, no. 6 (2009): 503–509, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Nahlieli O., “Complications of Traditional and Modern Therapeutic Salivary Approaches,” Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 37, no. 2 (2017): 142–147, 10.14639/0392-100X-1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bovenzi C. D., Ciolek P., Crippen M., Curry J. M., Krein H., and Heffelfinger R., “Reconstructive Trends and Complications Following Parotidectomy: Incidence and Predictors in 11,057 Cases,” Journal of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery 48, no. 1 (2019): 64, 10.1186/s40463-019-0387-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Chiesa Estomba C., Valldeperes‐Vilanova A., González‐García J., Larruscain‐Sarasola E., Sistiaga‐Suarez J., and Altuna‐Mariezcurrena X., “Neurological Complications and Quality of Life After Submandibular Gland Resection. A Prospective, Non‐Randomized, Single‐Centre Study,” Polish Journal of Otolaryngology 73, no. 6 (2019): 32–37, 10.5604/01.3001.0013.4120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fang C. J., Saadat G. H., Butler B. A., and Bokhari F., “The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Outcomes for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients,” Journal of Arthroplasty 37, no. 8S (2022): S836–S841, 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Vora M., Sing D. C., Yi P. H., Cheah J. W., and Li X., “Hypoalbuminemia Is a Risk Factor for Predicting Early Postoperative Complications After Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation,” Journal of Orthopaedics 19 (2020): 106–110, 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lund S., Chauhan K. K., Zietlow J., et al., “Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Leak After Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Operative Repair,” American Surgeon 87, no. 12 (2021): 1879–1885, 10.1177/00031348211056263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kisana H., Hui C. H., Deeyor S., Martin J. R., Stecher C., and Hustedt J. W., “Development of a Risk Stratification Scoring System to Predict General Surgical Complications for Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Surgery,” Orthopedics 45, no. 3 (2022): 139–144, 10.3928/01477447-20220217-03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gelfand Y., De la Garza R. R., Nakhla J. P., Echt M., Yanamadala V., and Yassari R., “Predictive Value of Hypoalbuminemia and Severe Hypoalbuminemia in Oncologic Spine Surgery,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 210 (2021): 107009, 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Huang S., Zhou Z., Luo L., et al., “Preoperative Serum Albumin: A Promising Indicator of Early Mortality After Surgery for Infective Endocarditis,” Annals of Translational Medicine 9, no. 18 (2021): 1445, 10.21037/atm-21-3913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. McLean C., Mocanu V., Birch D. W., Karmali S., and Switzer N. J., “Hypoalbuminemia Predicts Serious Complications Following Elective Bariatric Surgery,” Obesity Surgery 31, no. 10 (2021): 4519–4527, 10.1007/s11695-021-05641-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tan Y., Jiang L., Liu H., Pan Z., Wang H., and Chen L., “The Effect of Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia on Complications After Primary Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 562, 10.1186/s13018-021-02702-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kim S., McClave S. A., Martindale R. G., Miller K. R., and Hurt R. T., “Hypoalbuminemia and Clinical Outcomes: What is the Mechanism Behind the Relationship?,” American Surgeon 83, no. 11 (2017): 1220–1227, 10.1177/000313481708301123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sciscent B. Y., Eberly H. W., Lorenz F. J., Truong N., Goldenberg D., and Goyal N., “Preoperative Serum Albumin as Predictor of Outcomes After Thyroidectomy,” OTO Open 8, no. 1 (2024): e114, 10.1002/oto2.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lee J. I., Kwon M., Roh J. L., et al., “Postoperative Hypoalbuminemia as a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection After Oral Cancer Surgery,” Oral Diseases 21, no. 2 (2015): 178–184, 10.1111/odi.12232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Khawaja I. M., Randhawa A., Randhawa K., et al., “Effect of Hypoalbuminemia in Patients Undergoing Parathyroidectomy for Primary Hyperparathyroidism,” Laryngoscope 133, no. 8 (2023): 2035–2039, 10.1002/lary.30691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Herzog I., Panchal D., Sikder S., et al., “Malnutrition in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction as a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes,” Annals of Plastic Surgery 92, no. 4S (2024): S251–S254, 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lee C. C., Wang T. T., Lubek J. E., and Dyalram D., “Is Preoperative Serum Albumin Predictive of Adverse Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery?,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 81, no. 11 (2023): 1422–1434, 10.1016/j.joms.2023.08.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sawchuk T., Verhoeff K., Jogiat U., et al., “Impact of Hypoalbuminemia on Outcomes Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 25,848 Patients,” Surgical Endoscopy 38, no. 9 (2024): 5030–5040, 10.1007/s00464-024-11018-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bohl D. D., Shen M. R., Kayupov E., Cvetanovich G. L., and Della Valle C. J., “Is Hypoalbuminemia Associated With Septic Failure and Acute Infection After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Study of 4517 Patients From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program,” Journal of Arthroplasty 31, no. 5 (2016): 963–967, 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wilson J. M., Lunati M. P., Grabel Z. J., Staley C. A., Schwartz A. M., and Schenker M. L., “Hypoalbuminemia Is an Independent Risk Factor for 30‐Day Mortality, Postoperative Complications, Readmission, and Reoperation in the Operative Lower Extremity Orthopaedic Trauma Patient,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 33, no. 6 (2019): 284–291, 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Panayi A. C., Knoedler L., Matar D. Y., et al., “The Combined Risk Predictive Power of Frailty and Hypoalbuminemia in Free Tissue Flap Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 34,571 Patients From the NSQIP Database,” Microsurgery 44, no. 4 (2024): e31156, 10.1002/micr.31156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Li R. and Zhu Y., “Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia is Associated With Higher 30‐Day Mortality and Complications After Esophagectomy,” American Surgeon 22 (2024): 51–58, 10.1177/00031348241278019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gibbs J., Cull W., Henderson W., Daley J., Hur K., and Khuri S. F., “Preoperative Serum Albumin Level as a Predictor of Operative Mortality and Morbidity: Results From the National VA Surgical Risk Study,” Archives of Surgery 134, no. 1 (1960): 36–42, 10.1001/archsurg.134.1.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Oster H. S., Dolev Y., Kehat O., Weis‐Meilik A., and Mittelman M., “Serum Hypoalbuminemia Is a Long‐Term Prognostic Marker in Medical Hospitalized Patients, Irrespective of the Underlying Disease,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 5 (2022): 1207, 10.3390/jcm11051207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhao R., Liang Z., Chen K., and Zhu X., “Nomogram Based on Inflammatory Biomarkers and Nutritional Indicators for Predicting Overall Survival in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma,” Journal of Inflammation Research 15 (2022): 2971–2981, 10.2147/JIR.S366299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Santos A., Santos I. C., Dos Reis P. F., Rodrigues V. D., and Peres W. A. F., “Impact of Nutritional Status on Survival in Head and Neck Cancer Patients After Total Laryngectomy,” Nutrition and Cancer 74, no. 4 (2022): 1252–1260, 10.1080/01635581.2021.1952446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Moramarco S., Morciano L., Morucci L., et al., “Epidemiology of Hypoalbuminemia in Hospitalized Patients: A Clinical Matter or an Emerging Public Health Problem?,” Nutrients 12, no. 12 (2020): 3656, 10.3390/nu12123656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Marin A. G., Pratali R. R., Marin S. M., and Herrero C. F. P. S., “Age and Spinal Disease Correlate to Albumin and Vitamin D Status,” Global Spine Journal 12, no. 7 (2022): 1468–1474, 10.1177/2192568220982561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Soloff M. A., Vargas M. V., Wei C., et al., “Malnutrition is Associated With Poor Postoperative Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy,” JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons 25, no. 1 (2021): e2020.00084, 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ladd M. R., Garcia A. V., Leeds I. L., et al., “Malnutrition Increases the Risk of 30‐Day Complications After Surgery in Pediatric Patients With Crohn Disease,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery 53, no. 11 (2018): 2336–2345, 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lemdani M. S., Choudhry H. S., Patel A. M., et al., “Malnutrition and Postoperative Outcomes Following Transcervical Zenker Diverticulectomy,” Laryngoscope 133, no. 6 (2023): 1402–1408, 10.1002/lary.30309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Soeters P. B., Wolfe R. R., and Shenkin A., “Hypoalbuminemia: Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance,” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 43, no. 2 (2019): 181–193, 10.1002/jpen.1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kaysen G. A., “Biochemistry and Biomarkers of Inflamed Patients: Why Look, What to Assess,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 4, no. S1 (2009): S56–S63, 10.2215/CJN.03090509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Curran S., Apruzzese P., Kendall M. C., and De Oliveira G., “The Impact of Hypoalbuminemia on Postoperative Outcomes After Outpatient Surgery: A National Analysis of the NSQIP Database,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien d'anesthésie 69, no. 9 (2022): 1099–1106, 10.1007/s12630-022-02280-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Danan D., Shonka D. C., Selman Y., Chow Z., Smolkin M. E., and Jameson M. J., “Prognostic Value of Albumin in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer,” Laryngoscope 126, no. 7 (2016): 1567–1571, 10.1002/lary.25877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Fahmy M. D., Hechler B. L., Carlson E. R., Gross A. J., and Heidel R. E., “Preoperative Serum Albumin Predicts Wound Dehiscence But Not Infection After Surgery for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 79, no. 6 (2021): 1355–1363, 10.1016/j.joms.2020.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Liu S. A., Wong Y. K., Poon C. K., Wang C. C., Wang C. P., and Tung K. C., “Risk Factors for Wound Infection After Surgery in Primary Oral Cavity Cancer Patients,” Laryngoscope 117, no. 1 (2007): 166–171, 10.1097/01.mlg.0000249737.05840.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bohl D. D., Shen M. R., Kayupov E., and Della Valle C. J., “Hypoalbuminemia Independently Predicts Surgical Site Infection, Pneumonia, Length of Stay, and Readmission After Total Joint Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 31, no. 1 (2016): 15–21, 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kishawi D., Schwarzman G., Mejia A., Hussain A. K., and Gonzalez M. H., “Low Preoperative Albumin Levels Predict Adverse Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 102, no. 10 (2020): 889–895, 10.2106/JBJS.19.00511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kamalapathy P. N., Karhade A. V., Groot O. Q., et al., “Predictors of Reoperation After Surgery for Spinal Epidural Abscess,” Spine Journal 22, no. 11 (2022): 1830–1836, 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kawanishi M., Kami K., Nishimura Y., et al., “Exercise‐Induced Increase in M2 Macrophages Accelerates Wound Healing in Young Mice,” Physiological Reports 10, no. 19 (2022): e15447, 10.14814/phy2.15447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Xu W., Peng X., and Jiang B., “Hypoalbuminemia After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Does Not Predict or Affect Short‐Term Postoperative Prognosis,” BMC Surgery 20, no. 1 (2020): 72, 10.1186/s12893-020-00739-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Lim S., Kim B. D., Kim J. Y., and Ver Halen J. P., “Preoperative Albumin Alone is Not a Predictor of 30‐Day Outcomes in Pressure Ulcer Patients: A Matched Propensity‐Score Analysis of the 2006‐2011 NSQIP Datasets,” Annals of Plastic Surgery 75, no. 4 (2015): 439–447, 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Mahvi D. A., Pak L. M., Urman R. D., Gold J. S., and Whang E. E., “Discharge Destination Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP Analysis of Predictive Factors and Post‐Discharge Outcomes,” American Journal of Surgery 218, no. 2 (2019): 342–348, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Moghadamyeghaneh Z., Hwang G., Hanna M. H., et al., “Even Modest Hypoalbuminemia Affects Outcomes of Colorectal Surgery Patients,” American Journal of Surgery 210, no. 2 (2015): 276–284, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Quan T., Lopez J. D., Chen F. R., et al., “A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Association Between Hypoalbuminemia and Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Receiving Open Rotator Cuff Repair,” Journal of Orthopaedics 30 (2022): 88–92, 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Yamamoto Y., Shigematsu H., Iwata E., et al., “Hypoalbuminemia Increased the Length of Stay in the Treatment of Postoperative Acute Surgical Site Infection in Spinal Surgery,” Spine 45, no. 23 (2020): E1564–E1571, 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. McGlone P. J., Li L. T., Bokshan S. L., O'Donnell R., and Owens B. D., “Preoperative Malnutrition Increases Odds of Hospital Admission and Extended Length of Stay Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair,” Physician and Sportsmedicine 49, no. 2 (2021): 236–240, 10.1080/00913847.2020.1824535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kamath A. F., Nelson C. L., Elkassabany N., Guo Z., and Liu J., “Low Albumin Is a Risk Factor for Complications After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Journal of Knee Surgery 30, no. 3 (2017): 269–275, 10.1055/s-0036-1584575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Multivariable binary logistic regression models identifying factors associated with any surgical complication following MSG resection adjusting for hypoalbuminemia as a continuous variable.

Table S2. Multivariable binary logistic regression models identifying factors associated with any medical complication following MSG resection adjusting for hypoalbuminemia as a continuous variable.

Table S3. Multivariable binary logistic regression models of the association between hypoalbuminemia and adverse postoperative outcomes following MSG resection adjusting for hypoalbuminemia as a continuous variable.

Table S4. Univariate analysis of demographics and comorbidities of patients undergoing MSGC resection stratified by patients with and without known preoperative albumin levels.

Table S5. Univariate analysis of rates of operative/post‐operative complications stratified by patients with and without known preoperative albumin levels.

LIO2-10-e70107-s001.docx (38.8KB, docx)

Articles from Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES