Skip to main content
Pharmaceutical Biology logoLink to Pharmaceutical Biology
. 2025 Feb 25;63(1):141–155. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2025.2469607

Mechanism of action of genistein on breast cancer and differential effects of different age stages

Zhebin Xiang a,✉, Bo Ma b, Xiujun Pei c, Wenjie Wang a, Weilun Gong a
PMCID: PMC11864014  PMID: 39996512

Abstract

Context

Genistein, a soy-derived isoflavone, exhibits structural similarities with 17β-estradiol and demonstrates antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and estrogenic properties. Despite its low bioavailability limiting its clinical application, it shows potential for breast cancer prevention and treatment.

Objective

This review aims to summarize the pharmacological effects and molecular mechanisms of genistein in breast cancer, focusing on its therapeutic potential, strategies to overcome bioavailability limitations, and its role in personalized medicine. Differential impacts among population subgroups are also discussed.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases. Studies were selected based on their focus on genistein’s mechanisms of action, strategies to enhance its bioavailability, and interactions with other therapies.

Results

Genistein exerted anticancer effects by modulating estrogen receptor β (ERβ), inhibiting angiogenesis, arresting the cell cycle, and inducing apoptosis. Its antioxidant properties help mitigate tumor-associated oxidative stress. Bioavailability enhancement strategies, such as nanoparticle and lipid-based formulations, show promise. Age-dependent effects were evident, with distinct responses observed in prepubertal, menopausal, and postmenopausal populations, underscoring its potential for personalized therapies. Furthermore, genistein influences epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and miRNA expression, bolstering its anticancer efficacy.

Conclusion

Genistein is a promising candidate for breast cancer therapy, particularly for personalized treatment. Strategies to enhance bioavailability and further clinical research are essential to optimize its therapeutic potential and evaluate its efficacy in combination therapies.

Keywords: Breast cancer, genistein, molecular mechanism, different population, clinical trials, therapeutic benefits

Introduction

Breast cancer is a major global health challenge and remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women (National Cancer Institute 2024). While advances in early detection and treatment have improved survival rates, the recurrence of tumors, resistance to conventional therapies, and significant side effects continue to hinder treatment effectiveness. As a result, some natural compounds have garnered increasing attention for their potential to not only significantly reduce cancer incidence and progression, but also lower mortality rates with minimal side effects (Bandera et al. 2011; Barnes et al. 2011).

Genistein, a soy-derived isoflavone, has garnered considerable attention owing to its structural similarity to 17β-estradiol and its estrogenic effects. Genistein has emerged as a promising candidate for breast cancer therapy, owing to its potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and estrogenic properties. A 2014 report by the American Institute for Cancer Research and the World Cancer Research Fund concluded that although research on this topic is limited, there is sufficient evidence suggesting that isoflavones, including genistein, can positively impact breast cancer survival rates. However, some studies (Yang et al. 2015) have reported conflicting results, indicating that genistein may stimulate cancer progression in certain cell and animal models. Therefore, the overall effect of genistein on breast cancer remains a topic of ongoing debate.

In addition to its estrogenic activity, genistein also exerts anti-cancer effects through apoptosis induction, inhibition of angiogenesis, and modulation of the cell cycle. However, its clinical application has been hindered by low bioavailability, which limits its effectiveness. Recent efforts have focused on improving bioavailability using advanced drug delivery systems such as nanoparticles and lipid-based formulations. Additionally, growing evidence suggests that the therapeutic response to genistein may differ across various patient populations, particularly prepubertal, menopausal, and postmenopausal women, emphasizing the need for personalized therapy.

This review examines the pharmacological mechanisms of genistein in breast cancer, explores strategies to enhance its bioavailability, and investigates its differential effects in various populations. It also discusses the potential of incorporating genistein into personalized treatment regimens to optimize clinical outcomes in breast cancer therapy.

Methods and materials

This section outlines the methods and materials employed to ensure the scientific rigor and reproducibility of the study. A thorough literature search and screening strategy were implemented to ensure data reliability and relevance. Validation entailed using the keyword ‘genistein’ in databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, alongside results from pertinent clinical trials. Data were sourced from specialized books and online resources, adhering to clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. The search strategy spanned multiple databases and adhered to PRISMA guidelines (PRISMA 2020). To exclude reproducible studies and meta-analyses Figure 1 shows the literature screening process.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

PRISMA study flow chart combination.

Genistein: structure and origin

Genistein flavonoids were first identified in Genista tinctoria L.(Fabaceae), which is the origin of its name. Genistein is prevalent in leguminous foods, seeds, fruits, and vegetables, with soybean being the primary source (Mei et al. 2019). In plants, isoflavone synthases generate genistein from the flavanone naringenin through ring migration (Bitto et al. 2010; Fan et al. 2013), serving functions such as UV filtration, phytochrome deposition, and symbiotic nitrogen fixation.

The initial synthesis of genistein was documented in 1928 by Baker and Robinson (Chang et al. 1994), who synthesized the 2-methyl precursor of genistein from a single-carbon homolog of a deoxybenzoin substrate. Genistein, with the formula 4′,5,7-trihydroxyisoflavone (C15H10O5), is structurally similar to estradiol and binds to Estrogen Receptor(ER) receptors (Yoon et al. 2014). Consequently, genistein exhibits estrogenic activity by binding to and stimulating relevant receptors during metabolism, impacting biological endocrinology, and possessing various biological activities. The structure of the dynein lignin is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Chemical structures of genistein and 17β-estradiol.

Bioavailability and biometabolism of genistein

Bioavailability refers to the amount of a substance absorbed by an organism, which is crucial for assessing the effectiveness of a chemical in the human body. In a typical diet, genistein is primarily absorbed in its glycoside form. Studies (Steensma et al. 2006) have shown that both free and glycoside forms of genistein are bioavailable, with genistein detectable in rat plasma 15 min post-administration, yielding Area Under Curve(AUC) values (0–24 h) of 54 and 24 μmol-h/L, respectively. Peak plasma concentrations of ingested genistein in adults occur at 4–7 h, whereas β-glycosides peak at 8–11 h (Cederroth et al. 2012).

The general metabolism of dietary genistein is shown in Figure 3. Genistein metabolism primarily occurs in the intestine (Setchell 1998), where it binds to glucuronic acid during intestinal transport. Some genistein reaches the liver, where it is excreted in the bile and re-enters the small intestine, allowing secondary absorption and metabolism (Steensma et al. 2006). Genistein is hydrolyzed to genistein flavonoids by β-glucosidase and phenol sulfatase; these flavonoids are lipophilic and active, either absorbed directly or further metabolized by intestinal flora (Friend and Chang 1984; Day et al. 1998). Specific colonic bacteria, such as Escherichia coli HGH21 and Gram-positive strain HGH6, convert genistein to 5-hydroxymarinol, which inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of SMMC-7721 and HepG2 cells in vitro (Lee et al. 2017).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Metabolism of genistein in humans. This figure illustrates the metabolic pathways of genistein, including enterohepatic circulation, hydrolyzation in the intestine by β-glucosidase and phenol sulphatase, and subsequent interactions with intestinal flora.HGH21, an E. coli strain; Mt1B8, a gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium identified as a member of the family coriobacteriaceae. This figure was created by the authors, based on data from related studies (Friend and Chang 1984; Setchell 1998; Steensma et al. 2006; Lee et al. 2017).

Various metabolites of genistein, including dihydrogen genistein flavonoids, soy flavonoids, and 6′-hydroxy-O-desmethyl angiopogonanol, have been identified in human and animal blood and excreta (Strassburg et al. 1998; Heinonen et al. 2003; Izukawa et al. 2009). Differences in the intestinal flora among individuals may significantly affect their responses to genistein. This suggests that the therapeutic efficacy of genistein in breast cancer can be optimized through dietary modifications or probiotic supplementation. The metabolism of genistein in humans is depicted in Figure 3.

Advances in nanotechnology for genistein delivery

The clinical application of genistein has been limited by its poor solubility, low bioavailability, and rapid metabolism (Jaiswal et al. 2019). Recent advancements in nanotechnology have introduced innovative delivery systems that address these limitations, significantly improving the therapeutic potential of genistein. This section explores four promising nanotechnology-based approaches: niosomes, folate-targeted systems, Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs), and Polymeric Micelles.

Niosomal delivery

Niosomes are bilayer vesicles formed from non-ionic surfactants, known for their biocompatibility and ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds (Akbarzadeh et al. 2022).

When combined with phytoestrogens, niosomes enhance their solubility, stability, and bioavailability, enabling controlled drug release (Moghtaderi et al. 2022). Niosomes enhance the therapeutic potential of genistein in cancer treatment by optimizing targeted delivery and significantly reducing the systemic side effects.

Folate-targeted systems

Folate-targeted systems are advanced delivery platforms functionalized with folic acid, leveraging the overexpression of folate receptors (FRs) in cancer cells to achieve receptor-mediated endocytosis (Zwicke et al. 2012). These systems provide enhanced targeting capabilities, minimize off-target effects, and improve therapeutic precision (Zwicke et al. 2012; Patra et al. 2022).

Some studies have shown that folate-conjugated chitosan nanoparticles (FGCN) significantly improve the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of genistein while achieving better-controlled drug release. FGCN enhanced the specificity of genistein delivery by interacting with FR-α, which is overexpressed in breast cancer cells (Cai et al. 2017). Experimental results revealed that FGCN reduced the 50% Inhibitory Concentration(IC50) of Genistein from 33.8 μg/ml to 14.6 μg/ml compared to non-targeted systems, demonstrating superior anticancer activity. Further apoptosis studies confirmed that FGCN outperformed unmodified systems and free genistein in inducing cancer cell death.

Solid lipid nanoparticles

SLNs are biocompatible lipid-based nanoparticles designed to enhance the delivery of lipophilic drugs, such as genistein (Scioli Montoto et al. 2020). By encapsulating genistein within SLNs, these systems improve their solubility, stability, and bioavailability while providing controlled and sustained release profiles, making them particularly effective for cancer therapy (Ferreira et al. 2022).

Some studies have shown that SLNs have the potential to reverse multidrug resistance (MDR) in breast cancer. Experiments with SLNs in drug-resistant breast cancer cells (MCF7/ADR) have demonstrated significantly enhanced intracellular drug uptake through caveola-mediated endocytosis (Xu et al. 2018). When caveolin-1 activity is inhibited by genistein, the uptake of SLNs is markedly reduced, indicating the critical role of this pathway in SLN-mediated delivery (Xu et al. 2018). By leveraging these mechanisms, SLNs can bypass efflux pumps in MDR cells, thereby improving the efficiency of drug delivery. Additionally, SLNs enable targeted delivery and sustained therapeutic levels in the tumor microenvironment, further enhancing the anticancer efficacy of genistein (Dobrzynska et al. 2020).

Polymeric micelles

Polymeric micelles are nanoscale delivery systems composed of amphiphilic block copolymers that self-assemble into a hydrophobic core and hydrophilic shell (Ghosh and Biswas 2021). This unique structure enhances the solubility and stability of poorly water-soluble drugs, such as genistein, protecting them from premature degradation and facilitating efficient drug delivery.

Some studies have shown that a novel genistein-loaded mixed micelle (GEN-M) system, composed of a polymeric solubilizer and Vitamin E derivative (TPGS), effectively addresses the solubility and bioavailability challenges of genistein (Shen et al. 2018). Optimized GEN-M micelles exhibited a mean particle size of 184.7 ± 2.8 nm, a narrow polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.162 ± 0.002, and a zeta potential of −2.92 ± 0.01 mV. The system achieved a high entrapment efficiency of 97.12 ± 2.11% and drug loading of 3.87 ± 1.26%. Encapsulation increased Genistein’s aqueous solubility to 1.53 ± 0.04 mg/mL, a significant improvement over free Genistein. Additionally, the GEN-M system demonstrated sustained drug release in vitro and enhanced permeability across a Caco-2 cell monolayer. Pharmacokinetic studies showed a 2.42-fold increase in oral bioavailability compared with free genistein.

Collectively, these delivery systems provide transformative solutions for overcoming the pharmacokinetic challenges of genistein, unlocking their full therapeutic potential in cancer therapy. Future studies should focus on integrating these systems with personalized medical approaches and exploring their applications in combination therapies to maximize clinical outcomes.

Mechanisms involved in the treatment of breast cancer with genistein

Relationship between genistein and estrogen

Genistein, a phytoestrogen structurally similar to 17β estradiol, mimics estrogen by binding to and activating estrogen receptors, leading to reduced estrogen production (Fritz et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2014; Ziaei and Halaby 2017). Unlike endogenous estrogens, which do not preferentially bind to either ER receptor, genistein, and S-oxynivalenol typically bind to ERβ rather than ERα (Kuiper et al. 1998; Muthyala et al. 2004). Activation of ERα is linked to breast cancer cell proliferation, whereas ERβ activation has the opposite effect (Treeck et al. 2010; Thomas and Gustafsson 2011; Jiang et al. 2013). Although genistein can activate ERα, its strong affinity for ERβ and competitive inhibition of estrogens suggests an inhibitory effect on breast cancer cell proliferation at specific doses (Sotoca et al. 2008; Pons et al. 2014; Lecomte et al. 2017).

Genistein may have different effects on various breast cancer subtypes, such as ER-positive and triple-negative cancers, due to its selective ERβ binding, warranting further investigation (Pons et al. 2014; Lecomte et al. 2017).

Genistein also reduces breast cancer cell growth through estrogen receptor-independent mechanisms, including inhibition of DNA topoisomerases and tyrosine kinases (Messina et al. 1994; Barnes and Peterson 1995), and suppresses the expression of invasive genes S100A8 and S100A9 in ERβ-overexpressing MCF-7 cells, which are associated with poor prognosis (Chang et al. 2008; Miller et al. 2017; Puar et al. 2018).

Effects of genistein on angiogenesis

Angiogenesis involves the growth of blood vessels within and around a tumor, primarily through the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells, forming a new lumen, nerve plexus, and vascular network (Puar et al. 2018; Salehi et al. 2021).

Genistein demonstrated unique antioxidant and antiangiogenic effects at specific doses, attributed to particular groups in its molecular structure. Further research (Kousidou et al. 2005) is needed to explore these structure-function relationships through molecular simulations and experimental validation. In T47D cells, genistein treatment reduced the expression of MMPs 2, 3, and 15, thereby inhibiting angiogenesis and metastasis through the transcriptional regulation of cancer-related genes and reducing breast cancer cell invasiveness. Another study (Latocha et al. 2014) indicated that genistein has a dual effect on angiogenesis, promoting angiogenesis at low (0.001–1 μM) and high (25–100 μM) concentrations. An animal (Danciu et al. 2014) experiment using genistein and a genistein-cyclodextrin mixture on chicken allantoic membranes (CAM) showed a reduction in both intra-egg and extra-egg angiogenesis, with more pronounced results for genistein alone.

Bioinformatics studies (Shukla et al. 2020) have confirmed that genistein inhibits angiogenesis through the Akt, HIF-1α, and VEGF signaling pathways. Combined evidence from bioinformatics, cell experiments, and animal studies support the role of genistein in inhibiting angiogenesis (Draut et al. 2017; Mukund et al. 2019).

Antioxidant effects of genistein

Cellular oxidative processes lead to various types of cancer (Loh et al. 2019). Studies have indicated that genistein has antioxidant properties (Javanbakht et al. 2014; Chang et al. 2015; Lopes de Azambuja et al. 2015; Rahman Mazumder and Hongsprabhas 2016), which inhibit erythrocyte hemolysis caused by diuric acid or hydrogen peroxide (Gyoergy et al. 1964; Patlolla et al. 2000). Genistein also inhibits hepatic mitochondrial microsomal lipid peroxidation, NADH oxidase, and the respiratory chain (Jha et al. 1985; Thannickal et al. 1998).

Researchers have attributed the anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, and enzymatic effects of genistein to its antioxidant properties. Giles and Wei (1997) found genistein to be an effective hydrogen peroxide scavenger, inhibiting hydrogen peroxide formation by 12-O-13-acetate (TPA) in HL-60 cells differentiated from dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). 1 and 5 mmol genistein significantly prolonged tumor latency and reduced tumor diversity by approximately 50% (Wei et al. 1995). Another controlled experiment (Foti et al. 2005) demonstrated the protective effects of isoflavones against oxidative DNA damage by supplementing Jurkat cells and primary lymphocytes with the two isoflavones. Isoflavones protect against oxidative DNA damage at concentrations below 2 mM. These antitumor properties may stem from genistein’s anti-priming and anti-promoting effects, blocking DNA adduct formation, and inhibiting oxidative and inflammatory events in vivo.

Genistein affects cell cycle arrest, antiproliferative mechanisms

Cell cycle arrest is a crucial anti-cancer mechanism that inhibits cancer cell proliferation, induces apoptosis, enhances chemotherapy and radiotherapy sensitivity, and prevents tumor recurrence and metastasis. The cell cycle is meticulously regulated and each phase is monitored by specific checkpoint proteins. Thirty years ago, using omics methods, researchers discovered that genistein suppresses protein kinases and regulates 183 proteins (Yan et al. 2010).

Research (Shao et al. 1998; Lin et al. 2000) indicates that Genistein inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation by arresting the G2/M phase, inducing p21WAF/CIP1 expression, and promoting apoptosis. Genistein induces G2 cell cycle arrest by downregulating Cdc25C phosphatase, upregulating p21Waf11/Cip1 expression, and consequently reducing Cdc2 kinase activity (Frey et al. 2001). Another study (Rahal and Simmen 2010) found that genistein lowered breast cancer risk by activating the PTEN pathway and inducing PTEN-p53 interactions in breast epithelial cell nuclei.

Additionally, genistein inhibits EGF-stimulated invasion in breast cancer by decreasing phosphorylated Akt, inhibiting the NF-κB pathway downstream of Akt, and modulating the PI3K/Akt and EGFR/Akt/NF-κB pathways (Brown et al. 1998; Pavese et al. 2010), which promote cellular differentiation and cancer cell death.

Bioinformatic analysis (Mukund et al. 2019) confirmed active site binding and interaction, highlighting the importance of lysine, serine, and aspartate residues. Further studies (Lamartiniere et al. 2002; Robillard and Segar 2006) have also suggested that combining genistein with chemotherapeutic agents may enhance chemotherapy efficacy by further inhibiting cell cycle proteins and promoting apoptosis.

Genistein induces cell apoptosis

Programmed cell death is a tightly regulated process triggered by stimuli such as tissue remodeling, cell detachment, genomic damage, and hypoxia (Adams 2003; Danial and Korsmeyer 2004; Adams and Cory 2007). Dysregulation of apoptosis can lead to cancer, while its induction in cancer cells inhibits cancer progression.

The Bcl-2 protein family is a key apoptosis regulator, and modulation of these proteins effectively controls apoptosis. Genistein has been shown to lower the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xl and increase the pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and caspase 3 in breast cancer cells (Li et al. 1999; Upadhyay et al. 2001; Po et al. 2002; Tophkhane et al. 2007). It downregulates Bcl-2, upregulates Bax, and disturbs the Bax to Bcl-2 ratio. Genistein regulates NF-κB, which has a binding site in the Bcl-2 promoter, indicating that genistein flavonoids may modulate Bcl-2 expression through NF-κB, thereby controlling apoptosis (Park et al. 2019).

Genistein also inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis via the MEK5/ERK5 pathway, reducing MEK5, total ERK5, and phosphorylated ERK5 protein levels in a concentration-dependent manner, consistent with growth inhibition and apoptosis induction (Park et al. 2019). Genistein exposure leads to a concentration-dependent decrease in NF-κB/p65 protein levels and NF-κB DNA-binding activity. Additionally, genistein induces apoptosis through Ca2+ regulatory activity, generating Ca2+ through phytoestrogen interactions with ER receptors, similar to vitamin D receptors (Sergeev 2004). It activates the Ca2+-dependent pro-apoptotic proteases, μ-calpain and caspase-12, inducing apoptosis in breast cancer cells (Hsiao et al. 2019).

Alterations in oncoprotein phosphatase 2 A (CIP2A) may also contribute to genistein-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis. In genistein-treated T47D and MCF-7-C3 breast cancer cells, CIP2A oncoprotein expression was abnormal (Zhao et al. 2016). Furthermore, genistein can block the G2/M phase of breast cancer cells via multiple pathways, leading to ROS-dependent apoptosis (Kaushik et al. 2019). The signaling pathways influenced by genistein are summarized in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Genistein induces apoptosis, anti-tumor proliferation, anti-angiogenesis, and reduction of inflammation-related gene production through some of the signaling pathways it affects. PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homolog; PI3K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinases; mTOR: the mammalian target of rapamycin; PIP3: Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate; Akt: Protein kinase B. Dashed lines represent inhibition, solid lines represent promotion. This figure was created by the authors, based on data from related studies (Adams 2003; Danial and Korsmeyer 2004; Zhao et al. 2016; Park et al. 2019).

Epigenetic mechanisms of genistein in breast cancer

Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and miRNA regulation, play a pivotal role in breast cancer progression by silencing tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) or activating oncogenes (Dworkin et al. 2009; Jovanovic et al. 2010). These reversible modifications present promising therapeutic targets for restoring normal gene expression. Genistein, a natural isoflavone, has demonstrated significant antitumor effects by modulating these epigenetic mechanisms, highlighting its therapeutic potential.

Genistein selectively inhibits DNMT1 activity and expression, a key enzyme in maintaining DNA methylation patterns (Baylin and Ohm 2006). Molecular docking studies reveal that genistein binds directly to DNMT1’s catalytic domain, competitively blocking its interaction with hemimethylated DNA, thereby reducing global methylation levels in breast cancer cells (Xie et al. 2014). This reactivates silenced TSGs such as ATM, PTEN, and SERPINB5, promoting apoptosis and reducing metastasis. Notably, genistein exhibits gene-specific effects; for instance, no changes were observed in SFN methylation or expression levels, underscoring its targeted epigenetic modulation.

Genistein also influences miRNA expression, which plays a critical role in tumor progression. Differential miRNA expression between tumor and non-tumor cells has been linked to angiogenesis, metastasis, and poor treatment outcomes in breast cancer (Li et al. 2012; Lyng et al. 2012). In MCF-7 cells, genistein upregulated miR-23b, enhancing adhesion spot attachment, reducing pseudopodia formation, and decreasing cell migration and invasion by regulating PAK2-mediated cytoskeletal reorganization (Pellegrino et al. 2013). Moreover, genistein induced apoptosis in metastatic MDA-MB-435 and Hs578t cells at low physiological concentrations, with pro-apoptotic miR-155 targeting FOXO3, PTEN, and p27 upregulated following treatment (de la Parra et al. 2016; Carbognin et al. 2019).

These findings demonstrate that genistein acts through dual epigenetic mechanisms: reversing aberrant DNA methylation by inhibiting DNMT1 and reactivating silenced TSGs, while simultaneously modulating miRNA networks to suppress tumor progression. This multifaceted epigenetic modulation underscores genistein’s potential as a therapeutic agent for breast cancer. Further research should explore its combinatory use with other therapies and its molecular interactions to optimize clinical application.

Genistein and mammary stem cells

Mammary tissues contain numerous long-lived, self-renewing, and pluripotent mammary stem cells (MaSCs) that differentiate into luminal and basal epithelial cell lineages (Stingl et al. 2001; Ercan et al. 2011; Koren and Bentires-Alj 2015). Alterations in MaSCs are linked to environmental signals, and their proper interaction and response drive mammary gland changes during puberty, menstruation, and pregnancy (Ercan et al. 2011).

Owing to their stem cell properties, MaSCs are susceptible to mutations that can lead to tumor formation (Tharmapalan et al. 2019; Khan et al. 2021), with these mutated cells known as breast tumor stem cells (BCSCs) (Kakarala and Wicha 2008; Lim et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2014; Bao et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2020). These cancer stem cells can repopulate and mirror the heterogeneity of the original tumor’s heterogeneity (Macias and Hinck 2012; de la Parra et al. 2016), contributing to poor prognosis, tumorigenesis, metastasis, recurrence, and therapy resistance (Charafe-Jauffret et al. 2009; Creighton et al. 2009; Ricardo et al. 2011; Yin and Glass 2011; Bartucci et al. 2015; Li et al. 2017; Palomeras et al. 2018; Rabinovich et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2020).

Genistein inhibits BCSCs by directly interfering with stem cell growth and differentiation pathways or through paracrine signaling from adjacent cells. It influences differentiation via the PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK pathways, and inhibits mammosphere formation by altering paracrine secretion (Montales et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2016). This inhibition is linked to AKT suppression and PTEN upregulation (Montales et al. 2012). Animal studies (Montales et al. 2013) have shown that genistein inhibits mammary adipogenesis by activating ERβ and suppressing PPARγ expression, thereby inhibiting mammosphere formation in breast cancer cells. In nude mice with MCF-7 xenografts, genistein reduced BCSCs by blocking the Hedgehog-Gli1 pathway and decreasing SMO and/or Gli1 protein levels (Fan et al. 2013).

MaSCs localize to terminal end buds (TEBs) (Macias and Hinck 2012). However, differentiation and a reduced number of TEBs are correlated with increased resistance to chemical carcinogenesis (Macias and Hinck 2012). Prepubertal genistein exposure enhances the differentiation of mammary epithelial cells, increases differentiated lobular alveolar structures, and reduces breast tumor incidence by eliminating TEBs (Thomsen et al. 2006), thereby decreasing breast tissue sensitivity to carcinogens (Cabanes et al. 2004; Peng et al. 2009; 2010; Jadhav et al. 2017). Further studies (Iorio et al. 2005; Guttilla and White 2009; Li et al. 2012) have suggested that genistein inhibits breast cancer development and progression by modulating BCSC-associated miRNAs.The anticancer effects of genistein are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Anticancer effects of genistein in in vivo/in vitro studies.

Research Cancer Model Study Dose Effect References
Estrogen receptor action MCF-7 (ERβ) 50 µM, 100 µM Inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation Chen et al. 2003
Breast cancer specimens from 417 stage I–III patients (2004–2006, Michigan). N/A Inhibits S100A8, S100A9 expression through ERα signaling Pons et al. 2014
Antiangiogenic effect Mouse breast cancer model 50 mg/kg Inhibits angiogenesis through VEGF and HIF-1α pathways. Draut et al.
2017; Mukund et al. 2019
T47D breast cancer cell line N/A Inhibits angiogenesis, metastasis by downregulating MMPs. Latocha et al. 2014
T47D breast cancer cells Low: 0.001–1 µM; High: 25–100 µM Promotes angiogenesis at low doses, inhibits at high doses. Berndt et al. 2018
Chicken embryo chorioallantoic
membrane (CAM)
3 µL (10 mM each) Genistein inhibits angiogenesis in CAM model. Danciu et al. 2014
Antioxidant effect Jurkat cells, lymphocytes, and healthy subjects. <2 mM Protects DNA from oxidative damage. Foti et al. 2005
Mouse skin tumor model 1 and 5 μmol Prolongs tumor latency, reduces multiplicity. Wei et al. 1995
HL-60 cells N/A Inhibits TPA-induced HL-60 cell differentiation Wei et al. 1995
Cell cycle arrest MCF-10F non-neoplastic breast epithelial cells 19–22 μM(IC50) Downregulates Cdc25c, upregulates p21, induces G2/M arrest. Frey et al. 2001
MCF-10A non-tumor
mammary epithelial cells
N/A Enhances PTEN expression and p53 binding, promotes cell cycle arrest. Rahal and Simmen 2010
Cancer cells (e.g., MCF-10A) Low concentration (dietary intake) Regulates cell cycle and Akt proteins, inhibits tumor growth, promotes apoptosis. Pavese et al. 2010
Apoptotic mechanisms MCF-7 breast cancer cells Bcl-2
overexpression
Regulates Bcl-2 proteins and MEK5/ERK5, induces apoptosis, inhibits growth. Park et al. 2019
MCF-7 breast cancer cells 50 μM Activates μ-calpain, caspase-12, induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Sergeev 2004
MCF-7, T47D breast cancer cells 0–60 μM Downregulates CIP2A, promotes apoptosis, inhibits growth. Zhao et al. 2016
miRNAs and cancer progression Breast cancer cells (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231) N/A Altering miRNA expression Pellegrino et al. 2013
MDA-MB-435, Hs578T breast cancer cells Low
physiologically relevant
concentratio
Upregulates miR-155, targets FOXO3, PTEN, casein kinase, and p27, inhibits viability, induces apoptosis. Carbognin et al. 2019
Mammary stem cells MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 mammary spheres 2 µM, 40 nM Regulates PI3K/Akt, induces ER-β stem cell differentiation. Liu et al. 2016
SV40-transformed MSF and MCF-7 cells. 40 nM Activates ERβ, inhibits PPARγ, reduces
mammary fat and mammosphere formation.
Montales et al. 2013
MCF-7 breast cancer cells 15 μM, 30 μM Reduces CD44⁺/CD24⁻ cells, breast cancer stem cells, and mammography volume. Fan et al. 2013
Nude mouse (MCF-7 transplantation) 20 mg/kg,
50 mg/kg
Blocks Hedgehog–Gli1, reduces SMO, Glil, and BCSCs in tumors. Fan et al. 2013
Combination therapy MCF-7/Adr breast cancer cells 30 µmol/L; Different doses of DOX Enhances DOX accumulation, downregulates Her2/neu, promotes G2/M arrest and apoptosis. Xue et al. 2014.

Synergy of genistein with other breast chemotherapeutic agents

Genistein interacts with drugs and carcinogens. When combined with anti-breast cancer drugs, genistein induces synergistic apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 and BT-474 cells, reducing chemotherapeutic resistance (Satoh et al. 2003; Mai et al. 2007).

In MCF-7/Adr cells, the combination of doxorubicin and genistein synergistically inhibited HER2/neu expression and increased the intracellular accumulation of doxorubicin, thereby decreasing chemoresistance (Xue et al. 2014). Cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) is crucial for the activation of environmental carcinogens and endogenous estrogen during breast cancer cell development (Kunnumakkara et al. 2020). At 5 µM, genistein significantly inhibited the expression of Cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) induced by the environmental carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA), thereby reducing its carcinogenic metabolism and alleviating oxidative DNA damage, thus playing a crucial role in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer (Leung et al. 2009).

Breast cancer endocrine treatment typically involves three drug types: (1) aromatase inhibitors (AI), (2) selective estrogen receptor modulators and down-regulators such as tamoxifen, and (3) LHRH analogs for ovarian deprivation. These medications, which regulate estrogen levels, along with oral glucocorticoids used for over six months, are more likely to cause calcium loss, reduced bone density, and a higher risk of osteoporosis (Javed et al. 2025). Phytoestrogens theoretically mitigate bone loss owing to higher ER-β expression in bone tissue (Greenwood et al. 2000). A meta-analysis (Ma et al. 2008) indicated a significant reduction in spinal bone loss after six months of daily 90 mg isoflavone supplementation. Amato et al. (Amato et al. 2013) found that, while daily intake of 120 mg isoflavones did not prevent localized bone loss, it reduced the loss of systemic bone mineral density.

Genistein with different populations

Although genistein is considered a natural compound that can effectively target breast cancer, its effects can vary among people of different ages and living conditions.

Intake and population breast cancer incidence rate

A meta-analysis (Boutas et al. 2022) exploring the link between soy intake and breast cancer revealed that only 25% of the 9699 diagnosed patients were in the high intake group, with most consuming 0–15 mg per day of genistein. The forest plot assessing the impact of low/high genistein intake on breast cancer diagnosis showed an odds ratio (OR) of 7.01 (95% CI = 6.58–7.47), indicating that individuals consuming >15 mg/d had a lower breast cancer rate than those consuming 0–15 mg/d. This pattern also held for menopausal women, where 0.35% of those developing breast cancer had an intake of >15 mg/d, versus 1.37% with 0–15 mg/d, with an OR of 3.91 (95% CI = 3.71–4.13). These findings suggest that, while menopause is a risk factor for breast cancer, it does not diminish the benefits of genistein intake in reducing breast cancer risk. Details about the intake and population-level breast cancer incidence rates are provided in Table 2 (Yamamoto et al. 2003; Kang et al. 2010; 2012; Zhang et al. 2012; Morimoto et al. 2014; Baglia et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2017; Wei et al. 2020).

Table 2.

Summary data for selected studies.

Study Country Participants n Daily soy isoflavones consumption
Total BC BC cases, n
BC cases, n
Pre-menopausal, n
Post-menopausal, n
0–15 mg/day >15 mg/day 0–15 mg/day >15 mg/day BC 0–15 mg/day >15 mg/day BC
Kang et al. 2010 China 524 132 392     248     276 524
Kang et al. 2012 China 288 187 101     107     181 288
Zhang et al. 2012 China 616 397 219     326     290 616
Baglia et al. 2016 China 70,578 852 182 246 27 273 606 155 761 1034
Wei et al. 2015 China 300.852 2031 258 1004 116 1120 1.027 142 1.169 2289
Yamamoto et al. 2003 Japan 21,852 94 85 50 39 89 43 44 87 179
Morimoto et al. 2014 USA 84.550 3578 1191 507 150 657 3.071 1.041 4112 4769
Zhang et al. 2017 USA,Canada, Australia 6,235 4597 1.524 2210 846 3056 2.462 714 3176 6235

BC: Breast cancer.

Genistein and the menopausal population

Menopause is an aging process that can cause a variety of symptoms including hot flashes, sweating, and mood changes. Currently, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is the most effective way to alleviate menopausal syndromes. However, the Women’s Health Initiative (Krebs et al. 2004) showed that HRT increased the development of coronary heart disease, stroke, and breast cancer in postmenopausal women. With recent studies of natural plant replacement therapies, phytoestrogens have gradually gained attention.

Vasomotor syndrome

Vasomotor syndrome (VMS) encompasses symptoms such as hot flashes and sweating due to disrupted vasoconstriction and diastole after menopause. Epidemiological studies (Reed et al. 2013) have revealed that the incidence of postmenopausal hot flashes in women from Asian countries with high soy consumption, including China, Japan, and South Korea, is significantly lower (10%–25%) than that in Western countries (60%–90%).

A small prospective study (Cheng et al. 2007) indicated that menopausal women taking 60 mg/d of isoflavones for 12 weeks experienced a 57% decrease in the severity and frequency of hot flashes. Another study (Welty et al. 2007) by Welty et al. confirmed a reduction of over 40% in hot flashes in all menopausal women.

Osteoporosis

Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is a prevalent age-related condition linked to aging. Estrogen deficiency is the primary cause of PMO. Severe postmenopausal estrogen deficiency increases osteoclast activity, reduces bone density, increases bone turnover, disrupts calcium salt deposition, enhances bone resorption, and causes significant bone loss culminating in PMO.

Genistein, through its phytoestrogenic effects and specific affinity for the ERβ receptor, can effectively affect PMO development, similar to its influence on osteoporosis during chemotherapy (Greenwood et al. 2000; Ma et al. 2008; Amato et al. 2013).

Metabolic syndrome

Postmenopausal changes in metabolism may lead to obesity, which in turn may lead to a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease. One study (Jain et al. 2022) showed that genistein significantly reduced glucose concentration and increased sensitivity in postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes. Genistein also reduced blood pressure and triglyceride concentrations as well as circulating insulin levels in postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome. In addition, adipocyte differentiation is mediated by the Erß signaling pathway, and genistein can inhibit adipogenesis by activating ERβ and suppressing PPARγ expression (Montales et al. 2013).

Other progress

Some studies have discussed the effects of genistein on cognitive function, but there are reservations about the need for genistein because it has less of an overall effect or is not the most effective alternative.

Genistein and the early developmental population

Prepuberty and genistein contact can induce increased differentiation of mammary epithelial cells to increase the number of differentiated lobular alveolar structures, reducing the incidence of breast tumors by eliminating terminal buds (Thomsen et al. 2006). Researchers (Lamartiniere et al. 2002; Peng et al. 2010) have found that rats must be exposed to genistein between birth and prepubertal mammary gland development in order to reduce the risk of breast cancer. Thus, genistein can enter adolescent human life as a breast cancer-preventive agent during the prepubertal stage.

Genistein and the fetus

Many chronic human diseases and disorders, including breast cancer, have developmental origins (Robillard and Segar 2006). Fetal epigenetic genes are particularly vulnerable to dysregulation during early development and are sensitive to environmental factors. Research (Hilakivi-Clarke and de Assis 2006) indicates that breast cancer may originate in the fetal environment. Consequently, maternal diets with epigenetic regulatory properties could influence the epigenetic reprogramming process, causing permanent changes in the offspring that affect breast cancer susceptibility.

Genistein, a recognized dietary epigenetic modulator, is considered a safe and effective preventive agent against breast cancer (Dolinoy et al. 2006; Li et al. 2009; Li and Tollefsbol 2010; Li et al. 2013). Long-term maternal treatment with a genistein diet can induce epigenetic inheritance of key tumor-related genes, potentially aiding in breast cancer prevention in their offspring (Chen et al. 2022).

Risks and other impacts of genistein use

Genistein and reproduction

Genistein, a phytoestrogen, binds to estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) and disrupts testosterone biosynthesis in humans, causing hormonal imbalance. Its interaction with endocrine disruptors impairs testicular function. A study (Haun et al. 2018) of 12 men consuming 56 g/d of soy protein for four weeks revealed a 19% reduction in serum testosterone levels.

In women, high doses of genistein affect ovarian activity via multiple pathways, resulting in both estrogenic and antisteroidogenic effects that diminish ovarian function. This isoflavone has shown benefits in treating polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (Guelfi et al. 2023). The effects of genistein on pregnancy are unclear and vary according to species, administration route, and dosage.

Genistein and the thyroid gland

Genistein shows potential as an anti-menopausal syndrome treatment, but some studies indicate it may affect thyroid disorders by inhibiting thyroid peroxidase (TPO) activity, which is crucial for synthesizing triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4). Up to 10% of postmenopausal women might develop undetected hypothyroidism, raising concerns about the estrogen-like effects of genistein (Doerge and Sheehan 2002).

A meta-analysis (Otun et al. 2019) on the impact of soy consumption on thyroid function found significant changes in TSH levels, but not in fT3 and fT4 levels, suggesting that the adverse effects of soy on thyroid function in healthy adults may not be clinically significant. However, two studies (Sathyapalan et al. 2017a, 2017b) observed significant increases in TSH and decreases in fT4 after 12 weeks of soy protein and isoflavone supplementation, without resulting in subclinical or significant hypothyroidism.

A randomized trial (Sathyapalan et al. 2011) with 60 subclinical hypothyroidism patients who consumed 16 mg of phytoestrogen daily for six months found that 11.5% progressed to significant hypothyroidism, a rate three times higher than the low-dose group [standardized ratio 3.6 (95% CI = 1.9,6.2)].

Thus, while genistein has less impact on those without subclinical hypothyroidism, further research and caution are needed for its use in pregnant women, infants, and patients with subclinical hypothyroidism.

Genistein and allergy

Genistein, a soybean metabolite, can cause allergic reactions (allergies). Soy allergy usually begins in childhood and presents as an allergic reaction to soy infant formula. Symptoms include paresthesia, eczema, itchy skin, wheezing, diarrhea, stomachache, vomiting, and red skin. However, most children overcame the soy allergies. Although soybean allergies can cause discomfort, the results are not serious and do not lead to fatalities (Warren et al. 2020).

Discussion

The anticancer potential of genistein, a natural phytochemical, against breast cancer has been confirmed in numerous studies. As an isoflavone, genistein shares a structure similar to that of estrogen and can regulate the proliferation, apoptosis, and migration of breast cancer cells through the estrogen receptor pathway, tyrosine kinase inhibition, and antioxidant effects. Compared with traditional chemotherapeutic drugs, genistein exhibits a milder and more diverse mechanism of action, showing distinct advantages in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation, inducing apoptosis, and suppressing tumor invasion.

Although genistein has demonstrated strong anticancer potential in vitro, its clinical application has faced challenges. This discrepancy is closely related to the bioavailability of genistein, which is characterized by low absorption rates and rapid metabolism in vivo, limiting its anticancer effects in clinical settings. However, recent advancements in drug delivery systems, such as nanocarriers and liposomes, have significantly enhanced the concentration of genistein in cancer cells, thereby improving its anticancer efficacy. With these advancements, the issue of low bioavailability may no longer pose a significant barrier to its clinical application.

The anticancer mechanism of genistein in breast cancer involves multiple molecular pathways, including regulation of the cell cycle, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, binding to hormone receptors, and modulation of cytochrome P450(CYP450) enzymes. Additionally, genistein activates key signaling pathways such as MAPK/ERK, which support tumor cell growth and survival. Despite gradual elucidation of genistein’s mechanism of action, several unresolved questions remain. For example, studies have reported variability in the effects of genistein across different cell lines, dosages, and administration methods, suggesting that its mechanism of action may be context-dependent and complex. Moreover, there is still no consensus regarding the differential effects of genistein on various breast cancer subtypes.

Furthermore, according to available clinical research, the effect of genistein as a single therapeutic agent remains limited. The heterogeneity of breast cancer complicates the use of genistein as a monotherapy. Therefore, future research should focus on exploring the potential of genistein for breast cancer prevention, particularly in high-risk groups. Additionally, investigating the synergistic effects of genistein with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies will be a key area for future study. Combination therapy with genistein may enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs, overcome chemotherapy resistance, improve immune responses, and reduce chemotherapy side effects. This approach is expected to offer new strategies for individualized breast cancer treatment and facilitate the broader clinical application of genistein.

The incidence of breast cancer is significantly higher in Western countries than in Asian countries (Sung et al. 2021). Traditionally, this disparity has been attributed to established risk factors such as early menarche, late first pregnancy, and delayed menopause (Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer 2012). However, recent studies have suggested that dietary habits may play a critical role (Wan et al. 2022). The dietary preference for soy-based foods among Asian populations may be a key factor contributing to their lower incidence of breast cancer. Against this backdrop, genistein, a natural compound, has gained attention owing to its potential role in breast cancer prevention and treatment. For instance, in postmenopausal women with low estrogen levels, genistein may modulate hormone receptors via alternative pathways, reducing dependence on estrogen, and potentially influencing breast cancer progression. Additionally, its effect on metabolically active breast tissue during adolescence warrants further investigation to better understand its role in breast cancer risk. Therefore, genistein holds significant promise as a bioactive supplement in future research and applications.

Another challenge is the potential side effects of genistein. The research by Sathyapalan et al. shows that although it is relatively low in toxicity, high doses may lead to hormone imbalances, reduced testosterone synthesis, and potential thyroid dysfunction. Further clinical data are needed to confirm the safety of its long-term use.

Future research should focus on the following key areas:1.Conduct in-depth studies on the mechanism of genistein, particularly regarding its differential effects in various subtypes of breast cancer.2.Explore the clinical therapeutic effects of genistein in combination with chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies, such as genistein and taxanes, especially in overcoming chemotherapy resistance.3.Additional clinical trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genistein in patients of different ages and physiological conditions.

Conclusions

This review highlights the anticancer potential of genistein in breast cancer, particularly in combination therapies with chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. Despite promising results in various experiments, the clinical application of genistein faces challenges, particularly because of its low bioavailability. However, advancements in drug delivery systems have offered potential solutions for enhancing their therapeutic efficacy.

The innovative contribution of this review is its comprehensive exploration of the therapeutic effects of genistein across different regions and physiological states, including its use in various populations, such as prepubertal, menopausal, and postmenopausal women. This review also highlights the potential of genistein as a preventive agent and its synergistic effect with conventional treatments. Furthermore, it analyzed both the benefits and risks of genistein use, providing valuable insights for personalized breast cancer treatment strategies.

Future research should focus on optimizing the bioavailability of genistein, further exploring its clinical applications, and conducting extensive trials to confirm its safety and efficacy in diverse patient populations, especially in high-risk groups.

Acknowledgments

Zhebin Xiang and Bo MA were responsible for the conceptualization and design of the study. Xiujun Pei, Wenjie Wang, and Weilun Gong contributed to data curation and analysis. Zhebin Xiang drafted the manuscript and was responsible for the writing of the initial content. Weilun Gong and Zhebin Xiang jointly revised the manuscript, providing intellectual input and improving the clarity and academic quality of the content. Bo MA supervised the project and provided critical guidance throughout. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Program [Grant numbers 2020ZB002 and 2021ZA003], and the Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Program [Grant number 2020KY003].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contributions

CRediT: Zhebin Xiang: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing; Bo Ma: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing; Xiujun Pei: Data curation, Investigation; Wenjie Wang: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology; Weilun Gong: Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Data availability statement

The data supporting the findings of this review were collected from publicly available sources, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, following the PRISMA guidelines. These data consist of published research studies and clinical trial results on genistein and its effects on breast cancer. No new datasets were generated during this study. All data are available in the cited references and can be accessed through the respective databases.

References

  1. Adams JM. 2003. Ways of dying: multiple pathways to apoptosis. Genes Dev. 17(20):2481–2495. doi: 10.1101/gad.1126903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams JM, Cory S.. 2007. The Bcl-2 apoptotic switch in cancer development and therapy. Oncogene. 26(9):1324–1337. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akbarzadeh I, Farid M, Javidfar M, Zabet N, Shokoohian B, Arki MK, Shpichka A, Noorbazargan H, Aghdaei HA, Hossein-Khannazer N, et al. 2022. The optimized formulation of tamoxifen-loaded niosomes efficiently induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in breast cancer cells. AAPS PharmSciTech. 23(1):57. doi: 10.1208/s12249-022-02212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amato P, Young RL, Steinberg FM, Murray MJ, Lewis RD, Cramer MA, Barnes S, Ellis KJ, Shypailo RJ, Fraley JK, et al. 2013. Effect of soy isoflavone supplementation on menopausal quality of life. Menopause. 20(4):443–447. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318275025e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baglia ML, Zheng W, Li H, Yang G, Gao J, Gao Y-T, Shu X-O.. 2016. The association of soy food consumption with the risk of subtype of breast cancers defined by hormone receptor and HER2 status. Int J Cancer. 139(4):742–748. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bandera EV, King M, Chandran U, Paddock LE, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Olson SH.. 2011. Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk: a population-based case control study. BMC Womens Health. 11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bao L, Cardiff RD, Steinbach P, Messer KS, Ellies LG.. 2015. Multipotent luminal mammary cancer stem cells model tumor heterogeneity. Breast Cancer Res. 17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0615-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barnes S, Peterson TG.. 1995. Biochemical targets of the isoflavone genistein in tumor cell lines. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 208(1):103–108. doi: 10.3181/00379727-208-43840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnes S, Prasain J, D’Alessandro T, Arabshahi A, Botting N, Lila MA, Jackson G, Janle EM, Weaver CM.. 2011. The metabolism and analysis of isoflavones and other dietary polyphenols in foods and biological systems. Food Funct. 2(5):235–244. doi: 10.1039/c1fo10025d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bartucci M, Dattilo R, Moriconi C, Pagliuca A, Mottolese M, Federici G, Benedetto AD, Todaro M, Stassi G, Sperati F, et al. 2015. TAZ is required for metastatic activity and chemoresistance of breast cancer stem cells. Oncogene. 34(6):681–690. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Baylin SB, Ohm JE.. 2006. Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer – A mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction? Nat Rev Cancer. 6(2):107–116. doi: 10.1038/nrc1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berndt S, Issa ME, Carpentier G, Cuendet M.. 2018. A bivalent role of genistein in sprouting angiogenesis. Planta Med. 84(9-10):653–661. doi: 10.1055/a-0587-5991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bitto A, Polito F, Squadrito F, Marini H, D’Anna R, Irrera N, Minutoli L, Granese R, Altavilla D.. 2010. Genistein aglycone: a dual mode of action anti-osteoporotic soy isoflavone rebalancing bone turnover towards bone formation. Curr Med Chem. 17(27):3007–3018. doi: 10.2174/092986710791959738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boutas I, Kontogeorgi A, Dimitrakakis C, Kalantaridou SN.. 2022. Soy isoflavones and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. In Vivo. 36(2):556–562. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown NM, Wang J, Cotroneo MS, Zhao YX, Lamartiniere CA.. 1998. Prepubertal genistein treatment modulates TGF-alpha, EGF and EGF-receptor mRNAs and proteins in the rat mammary gland. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 144(1-2):149–165. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(98)00106-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cabanes A, Wang M, Olivo S, DeAssis S, Gustafsson J-A, Khan G, Hilakivi-Clarke L.. 2004. Prepubertal estradiol and genistein exposures up-regulate BRCA1 mRNA and reduce mammary tumorigenesis. Carcinogenesis. 25(5):741–748. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgh065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cai L, Yu R, Hao X, Ding X.. 2017. Folate receptor-targeted bioflavonoid genistein-loaded chitosan nanoparticles for enhanced anticancer effect in cervical cancers. Nanoscale Res Lett. 12(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2253-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Carbognin L, Miglietta F, Paris I, Dieci MV.. 2019. Prognostic and predictive implications of PTEN in breast cancer: unfulfilled promises but intriguing perspectives. Cancers. 11(9):1401. doi: 10.3390/cancers11091401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cederroth CR, Zimmermann C, Nef S.. 2012. Soy, phytoestrogens and their impact on reproductive health. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 355(2):192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chang EC, Charn TH, Park S-H, Helferich WG, Komm B, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS.. 2008. Estrogen receptors alpha and beta as determinants of gene expression: influence of ligand, dose, and chromatin binding. Mol Endocrinol. 22(5):1032–1043. doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chang T, DeFine L, Alexander T, Kyu T.. 2015. In vitro investigation of antioxidant, anti-Inflammatory, and antiplatelet adhesion properties of genistein-modified poly(ethersulfone)/poly(vinylpyrrolidone) hemodialysis membranes. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 103(3):539–547. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chang Y-C, , Nair MG, , Santell RC, , Helferich WG. 1994. Microwave-Mediated Synthesis of Anticarcinogenic Isoflavones from Soybeans. J Agric Food Chem. 42(9):1869–1871. 10.1021/jf00045a007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Charafe-Jauffret E, Ginestier C, Iovino F, Wicinski J, Cervera N, Finetti P, Hur M-H, Diebel ME, Monville F, Dutcher J, et al. 2009. Breast cancer cell lines contain functional cancer stem cells with metastatic capacity and a distinct molecular signature. Cancer Res. 69(4):1302–1313. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen W-F, , Huang M-H, , Tzang C-H, , Yang M, , Wong M-S. 2003. Inhibitory actions of genistein in human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1638(2):187–196. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(03)00082-6.12853125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cheng G, Wilczek B, Warner M, Gustafsson J-A, Landgren B-M.. 2007. Isoflavone treatment for acute menopausal symptoms. Menopause. 14(3 Pt 1):468–473. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31802cc7d0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen M, Li S, Srinivasasainagendra V, Sharma M, Li Z, Tiwari H, Tollefsbol TO, Li Y.. 2022. Maternal soybean genistein on prevention of later-life breast cancer through inherited epigenetic regulations. Carcinogenesis. 43(3):190–202. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgac009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen M, Rao Y, Zheng Y, Wei S, Li Y, Guo T, Yin P.. 2014. Association between soy isoflavone intake and breast cancer risk for pre- and post-menopausal women: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. PLOS One. 9(2):e89288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer . 2012. Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol. 13(11):1141–1151. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70425-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Creighton CJ, Li X, Landis M, Dixon JM, Neumeister VM, Sjolund A, Rimm DL, Wong H, Rodriguez A, Herschkowitz JI, et al. 2009. Residual breast cancers after conventional therapy display mesenchymal as well as tumor-initiating features. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(33):13820–13825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905718106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Danciu C, Soica C, Oltean M, Avram S, Borcan F, Csanyi E, Ambrus R, Zupko I, Muntean D, Dehelean CA, et al. 2014. Genistein in 1:1 inclusion complexes with ramified cyclodextrins: theoretical, physicochemical and biological evaluation. Int J Mol Sci. 15(2):1962–1982. doi: 10.3390/ijms15021962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Danial NN, Korsmeyer SJ.. 2004. Cell death: critical control points. Cell. 116(2):205–219. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00046-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Day AJ, DuPont MS, Ridley S, Rhodes M, Rhodes MJ, Morgan MR, Williamson G.. 1998. Deglycosylation of flavonoid and isoflavonoid glycosides by human small intestine and liver beta-glucosidase activity. FEBS Lett. 436(1):71–75. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01101-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. de la Parra C, Castillo-Pichardo L, Cruz-Collazo A, Cubano L, Redis R, Calin GA, Dharmawardhane S.. 2016. Soy isoflavone genistein-mediated downregulation of miR-155 contributes to the anticancer effects of genistein. Nutr Cancer. 68(1):154–164. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1115104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dobrzynska M, Napierala M, Florek E.. 2020. Flavonoid nanoparticles: a promising approach for cancer therapy. Biomolecules. 10(9):1268. doi: 10.3390/biom10091268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Doerge DR, Sheehan DM.. 2002. Goitrogenic and estrogenic activity of soy isoflavones. Environ Health Perspect. 110(Suppl 3):349–353. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s3349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dolinoy DC, Weidman JR, Waterland RA, Jirtle RL.. 2006. Maternal genistein alters coat color and protects Avy mouse offspring from obesity by modifying the fetal epigenome. Environ Health Perspect. 114(4):567–572. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Draut H, Rehm T, Begemann G, Schobert R.. 2017. Antiangiogenic and toxic effects of genistein, usnic acid, and their copper complexes in zebrafish embryos at different developmental stages. Chem Biodivers. 14(3):e1600302. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201600302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Dworkin AM, Huang TH-M, Toland AE.. 2009. Epigenetic alterations in the breast: implications for breast cancer detection, prognosis and treatment. Semin Cancer Biol. 19(3):165–171. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ercan C, van Diest PJ, Vooijs M.. 2011. Mammary development and breast cancer: the role of stem cells. Curr Mol Med. 11(4):270–285. doi: 10.2174/156652411795678007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fan P, Fan S, Wang H, Mao J, Shi Y, Ibrahim MM, Ma W, Yu X, Hou Z, Wang B, et al. 2013. Genistein decreases the breast cancer stem-like cell population through Hedgehog pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 4(6):146. doi: 10.1186/scrt357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fan Y, Wang C, Zhang Y, Hang P, Liu Y, Pan Z, Wang N, Du Z.. 2013. Genistein ameliorates adverse cardiac effects induced by arsenic trioxide through preventing cardiomyocytes apoptosis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 31(1):80–91. doi: 10.1159/000343351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ferreira M, Costa D, Sousa Â.. 2022. Flavonoids-based delivery systems towards cancer therapies. Bioengineering. 9(5):197. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9050197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Foti P, Erba D, Riso P, Spadafranca A, Criscuoli F, Testolin G.. 2005. Comparison between daidzein and genistein antioxidant activity in primary and cancer lymphocytes. Arch Biochem Biophys. 433(2):421–427. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2004.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Frey RS, Li J, Singletary KW.. 2001. Effects of genistein on cell proliferation and cell cycle arrest in nonneoplastic human mammary epithelial cells: involvement of Cdc2, p21(waf/cip1), p27(kip1), and Cdc25C expression. Biochem Pharmacol. 61(8):979–989. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(01)00572-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Friend DR, Chang GW.. 1984. A colon-specific drug-delivery system based on drug glycosides and the glycosidases of colonic bacteria. J Med Chem. 27(3):261–266. doi: 10.1021/jm00369a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fritz H, Seely D, Flower G, Skidmore B, Fernandes R, Vadeboncoeur S, Kennedy D, Cooley K, Wong R, Sagar S, et al. 2013. Soy, red clover, and isoflavones and breast cancer: a systematic review. PLOS One. 8(11):e81968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ghosh B, Biswas S.. 2021. Polymeric micelles in cancer therapy: state of the art. J Control Release. 332:127–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Giles D, Wei H.. 1997. Effect of structurally related flavones/isoflavones on hydrogen peroxide production and oxidative DNA damage in phorbol ester-stimulated HL-60 cells. Nutr Cancer. 29(1):77–82. doi: 10.1080/01635589709514605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Greenwood S, Barnes S, Clarkson TB, Eden J, Helferich WG, Hughes C, Messina M, Setchell KD.. 2000. The role of isoflavones in menopausal health. Menopause. 7(4):215–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Guelfi G, Pasquariello R, Anipchenko P, Capaccia C, Pennarossa G, Brevini TAL, Gandolfi F, Zerani M, Maranesi M.. 2023. The role of genistein in mammalian reproduction. Molecules. 28(21):7436. doi: 10.3390/molecules28217436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Guttilla IK, White BA.. 2009. Coordinate regulation of FOXO1 by miR-27a, miR-96, and miR-182 in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 284(35):23204–23216. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.031427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gyoergy P, Murata K, Ikehata H.. 1964. Antioxidants isolated from fermented soybeans (tempeh). Nature. 203(4947):870–872. doi: 10.1038/203870a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Haun CT, Mobley CB, Vann CG, Romero MA, Roberson PA, Mumford PW, Kephart WC, Healy JC, Patel RK, Osburn SC, et al. 2018. Soy protein supplementation is not androgenic or estrogenic in college-aged men when combined with resistance exercise training. Sci Rep. 8(1):11151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29591-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Heinonen SM, Hoikkala A, Wähälä K, Adlercreutz H.. 2003. Metabolism of the soy isoflavones daidzein, genistein and glycitein in human subjects. Identification of new metabolites having an intact isoflavonoid skeleton. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 87(4-5):285–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2003.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hilakivi-Clarke L, de Assis S.. 2006. Fetal origins of breast cancer. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 17(9):340–348. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2006.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hsiao Y-C, Peng S-F, Lai K-C, Liao C-L, Huang Y-P, Lin C-C, Lin M-L, Liu K-C, Tsai C-C, Ma Y-S, et al. 2019. Genistein induces apoptosis in vitro and has antitumor activity against human leukemia HL-60 cancer cell xenograft growth in vivo. Environ Toxicol. 34(4):443–456. doi: 10.1002/tox.22698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Liu C-G, Veronese A, Spizzo R, Sabbioni S, Magri E, Pedriali M, Fabbri M, Campiglio M, et al. 2005. MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 65(16):7065–7070. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Izukawa T, Nakajima M, Fujiwara R, Yamanaka H, Fukami T, Takamiya M, Aoki Y, Ikushiro S, Sakaki T, Yokoi T.. 2009. Quantitative analysis of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A and UGT2B expression levels in human livers. Drug Metab Dispos. 37(8):1759–1768. doi: 10.1124/dmd.109.027227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Jadhav RR, Santucci-Pereira J, Wang YV, Liu J, Nguyen TD, Wang J, Jenkins S, Russo J, Huang TH-M, Jin VX, et al. 2017. DNA methylation targets influenced by bisphenol A and/or genistein are associated with survival outcomes in breast cancer patients. Genes (Basel). 8(5):144. doi: 10.3390/genes8050144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Jain R, Bolch C, Al-Nakkash L, Sweazea KL.. 2022. Systematic review of the impact of genistein on diabetes-related outcomes. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 323(3):R279–R288. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00236.2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Jaiswal N, Akhtar J, Singh SP, Ahsan F.. 2019. An overview on genistein and its various formulations. Drug Res. 69(6):305–313. doi: 10.1055/a-0797-3657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Javanbakht MH, Sadria R, Djalali M, Derakhshanian H, Hosseinzadeh P, Zarei M, Azizi G, Sedaghat R, Mirshafiey A.. 2014. Soy protein and genistein improves renal antioxidant status in experimental nephrotic syndrome. Nefrologia. 34(4):483–490. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2014.Jun.12051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Javed L, Khakwani A, Khan U, Humphrey MB.. 2025. Medication-induced fractures: screening and treatment strategies. Am J Med Sci. 369(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Jha HC, von Recklinghausen G, Zilliken F.. 1985. Inhibition of in vitro microsomal lipid peroxidation by isoflavonoids. Biochem Pharmacol. 34(9):1367–1369. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(85)90672-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Jiang Y, Gong P, Madak-Erdogan Z, Martin T, Jeyakumar M, Carlson K, Khan I, Smillie TJ, Chittiboyina AG, Rotte SCK, et al. 2013. Mechanisms enforcing the estrogen receptor β selectivity of botanical estrogens. Faseb J. 27(11):4406–4418. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-234617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Jovanovic J, Rønneberg JA, Tost J, Kristensen V.. 2010. The epigenetics of breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 4(3):242–254. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kakarala M, Wicha MS.. 2008. Implications of the cancer stem-cell hypothesis for breast cancer prevention and therapy. J Clin Oncol. 26(17):2813–2820. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kang X, Zhang Q, Wang S, Huang X, Jin S.. 2010. Effect of soy isoflavones on breast cancer recurrence and death for patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. CMAJ. 182(17):1857–1862. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kang H-B, Zhang Y-F, Yang J-D, Lu K-L.. 2012. Study on soy isoflavone consumption and risk of breast cancer and survival. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 13(3):995–998. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.3.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kaushik S, Shyam H, Agarwal S, Sharma R, Nag TC, Dwivedi AK, Balapure AK.. 2019. Genistein potentiates Centchroman induced antineoplasticity in breast cancer via PI3K/Akt deactivation and ROS dependent induction of apoptosis. Life Sci. 239:117073. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Khan S, Suryavanshi M, Kaur J, Nayak D, Khurana A, Manchanda RK, Tandon C, Tandon S.. 2021. Stem cell therapy: a paradigm shift in breast cancer treatment. World J Stem Cells. 13(7):841–860. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i7.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Koren S, Bentires-Alj M.. 2015. Breast tumor heterogeneity: source of fitness, hurdle for therapy. Mol Cell. 60(4):537–546. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kousidou OC, Mitropoulou TN, Roussidis AE, Kletsas D, Theocharis AD, Karamanos NK.. 2005. Genistein suppresses the invasive potential of human breast cancer cells through transcriptional regulation of metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors. Int J Oncol. 26(4):1101–1109. doi: 10.3892/ijo.26.4.1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Krebs EE, Ensrud KE, MacDonald R, Wilt TJ.. 2004. Phytoestrogens for treatment of menopausal symptoms: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 104(4):824–836. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000140688.71638.d3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Kuiper GG, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, Corton JC, Safe SH, van der Saag PT, van der Burg B, Gustafsson JA.. 1998. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology. 139(10):4252–4263. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.10.6216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kunnumakkara AB, Shabnam B, Girisa S, Harsha C, Banik K, Devi TB, Choudhury R, Sahu H, Parama D, Sailo BL, et al. 2020. Inflammation, NF-κB, and chronic diseases: how are they linked? Crit Rev Immunol. 40(1):1–39. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2020033210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lamartiniere CA, Cotroneo MS, Fritz WA, Wang J, Mentor-Marcel R, Elgavish A.. 2002. Genistein chemoprevention: timing and mechanisms of action in murine mammary and prostate. J Nutr. 132(3):552S–558S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.3.552S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Latocha M, Płonka J, Kuśmierz D, Jurzak M, Polaniak R, Nowosad A.. 2014. Transcripional activity of genes encoding MMPs and TIMPs in breast cancer cells treated by genistein and in normal cancer-associated fibroblasts–in vitro studies. Acta Pol Pharm. 71(6):1095–1102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Lecomte S, Demay F, Ferrière F, Pakdel F.. 2017. Phytochemicals targeting estrogen receptors: beneficial rather than adverse effects? Int J Mol Sci. 18(7):1381. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Lee P-G, Kim J, Kim E-J, Lee S-H, Choi K-Y, Kazlauskas RJ, Kim B-G.. 2017. Biosynthesis of (-)-5-hydroxy-equol and 5-hydroxy-dehydroequol from soy isoflavone, genistein using microbial whole cell bioconversion. ACS Chem Biol. 12(11):2883–2890. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Leung HY, Yung LH, Poon CH, Shi G, Lu A-L, Leung LK.. 2009. Genistein protects against polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced oxidative DNA damage in non-cancerous breast cells MCF-10A. Br J Nutr. 101(2):257–262. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508998457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Li Y, Chen H, Hardy TM, Tollefsbol TO.. 2013. Epigenetic regulation of multiple tumor-related genes leads to suppression of breast tumorigenesis by dietary genistein. PLOS One. 8(1):e54369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Li Y, Liu L, Andrews LG, Tollefsbol TO.. 2009. Genistein depletes telomerase activity through cross-talk between genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Int J Cancer. 125(2):286–296. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Li W, Ma H, Zhang J, Zhu L, Wang C, Yang Y.. 2017. Unraveling the roles of CD44/CD24 and ALDH1 as cancer stem cell markers in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Sci Rep. 7(1):13856. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14364-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lim E, Vaillant F, Wu D, Forrest NC, Pal B, Hart AH, Asselin-Labat M-L, Gyorki DE, Ward T, Partanen A, et al. 2009. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat Med. 15(8):907–913. doi: 10.1038/nm.2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Lin HM, Moon BK, Yu F, Kim HR.. 2000. Galectin-3 mediates genistein-induced G(2)/M arrest and inhibits apoptosis. Carcinogenesis. 21(11):1941–1945. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.11.1941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Li Y, Tollefsbol TO.. 2010. Impact on DNA methylation in cancer prevention and therapy by bioactive dietary components. Curr Med Chem. 17(20):2141–2151. doi: 10.2174/092986710791299966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Liu S, Cong Y, Wang D, Sun Y, Deng L, Liu Y, Martin-Trevino R, Shang L, McDermott SP, Landis MD, et al. 2014. Breast cancer stem cells transition between epithelial and mesenchymal states reflective of their normal ­counterparts. Stem Cell Reports. 2(1):78–91. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu Y, Zou T, Wang S, Chen H, Su D, Fu X, Zhang Q, Kang X.. 2016. Genistein-induced differentiation of breast cancer stem/progenitor cells through a paracrine mechanism. Int J Oncol. 48(3):1063–1072. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Li Y, Upadhyay S, Bhuiyan M, Sarkar FH.. 1999. Induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 by genistein. Oncogene. 18(20):3166–3172. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Li L, Xiao B, Tong H, Xie F, Zhang Z, Xiao GG.. 2012. Regulation of breast cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis by miRNAs. Expert Rev Proteomics. 9(6):615–625. doi: 10.1586/epr.12.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Loh C-Y, Arya A, Naema AF, Wong WF, Sethi G, Looi CY.. 2019. Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STATs) proteins in cancer and inflammation: functions and therapeutic implication. Front Oncol. 9:48. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Lopes de Azambuja CR, dos Santos LG, Rodrigues MR, Rodrigues RFM, da Silveira EF, Azambuja JH, Flores AFC, Horn AP, Dora CL, Muccillo-Baisch AL, et al. 2015. Physico-chemical characterization of asolectin-genistein liposomal system: an approach to analyze its in vitro antioxidant potential and effect in glioma cells viability. Chem Phys Lipids. 193:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Lyng MB, Lænkholm A-V, Søkilde R, Gravgaard KH, Litman T, Ditzel HJ.. 2012. Global microRNA expression profiling of high-risk ER+ breast cancers from patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen mono-therapy: a DBCG study. PLOS One. 7(5):e36170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Ma D-F, Qin L-Q, Wang P-Y, Katoh R.. 2008. Soy isoflavone intake increases bone mineral density in the spine of menopausal women: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 27(1):57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Macias H, Hinck L.. 2012. Mammary gland development. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 1(4):533–557. doi: 10.1002/wdev.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Mai Z, Blackburn GL, Zhou J-R.. 2007. Genistein sensitizes inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on the growth of estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-overexpressing human breast cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 46(7):534–542. doi: 10.1002/mc.20300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Mei J, Chen X, Liu J, Yi Y, Zhang Y, Ying G.. 2019. A biotransformation process for production of genistein from sophoricoside by a strain of Rhizopus oryza. Sci Rep. 9(1):6564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42996-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Messina MJ, Persky V, Setchell KD, Barnes S.. 1994. Soy intake and cancer risk: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data. Nutr Cancer. 21(2):113–131. doi: 10.1080/01635589409514310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Miller P, Kidwell KM, Thomas D, Sabel M, Rae JM, Hayes DF, Hudson BI, El-Ashry D, Lippman ME.. 2017. Elevated S100A8 protein expression in breast cancer cells and breast tumor stroma is prognostic of poor disease outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 166(1):85–94. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4366-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Moghtaderi M, Sedaghatnia K, Bourbour M, Fatemizadeh M, Salehi Moghaddam Z, Hejabi F, Heidari F, Quazi S, Farasati Far B.. 2022. Niosomes: a novel targeted drug delivery system for cancer. Med Oncol. 39(12):240. doi: 10.1007/s12032-022-01836-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Montales MTE, Rahal OM, Kang J, Rogers TJ, Prior RL, Wu X, Simmen RCM.. 2012. Repression of mammosphere formation of human breast cancer cells by soy isoflavone genistein and blueberry polyphenolic acids suggests diet-mediated targeting of cancer stem-like/progenitor cells. Carcinogenesis. 33(3):652–660. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Montales MTE, Rahal OM, Nakatani H, Matsuda T, Simmen RCM.. 2013. Repression of mammary adipogenesis by genistein limits mammosphere formation of human MCF-7 cells. J Endocrinol. 218(1):135–149. doi: 10.1530/JOE-12-0520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Morimoto Y, Maskarinec G, Park S-Y, Ettienne R, Matsuno RK, Long C, Steffen AD, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN, Le Marchand L, et al. 2014. Dietary isoflavone intake is not statistically significantly associated with breast cancer risk in the Multiethnic Cohort. Br J Nutr. 112(6):976–983. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514001780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Mukund V, Behera SK, Alam A, Nagaraju GP.. 2019. Molecular docking analysis of nuclear factor-κB and genistein interaction in the context of breast cancer. Bioinformation. 15(1):11–17. doi: 10.6026/97320630015011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Muthyala RS, Ju YH, Sheng S, Williams LD, Doerge DR, Katzenellenbogen BS, Helferich WG, Katzenellenbogen JA.. 2004. Equol, a natural estrogenic metabolite from soy isoflavones: convenient preparation and resolution of R- and S-equols and their differing binding and biological activity through estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Bioorg Med Chem. 12(6):1559–1567. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2003.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. National Cancer Institute . 2024. Breast cancer patient version. https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast.
  108. Otun J, Sahebkar A, Östlundh L, Atkin SL, Sathyapalan T.. 2019. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of soy on thyroid function. Sci Rep. 9(1):3964. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40647-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Palomeras S, Ruiz-Martínez S, Puig T.. 2018. Targeting breast cancer stem cells to overcome treatment resistance. Molecules. 23(9):2193. doi: 10.3390/molecules23092193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Park C, Cha H-J, Lee H, Hwang-Bo H, Ji SY, Kim MY, Hong SH, Jeong J-W, Han MH, Choi SH, et al. 2019. Induction of G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by genistein in human bladder cancer T24 cells through inhibition of the ROS-dependent PI3k/Akt signal transduction pathway. Antioxidants (Basel). 8(9):327. doi: 10.3390/antiox8090327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Patlolla A, Zubkov A, Parent A, Zhang J.. 2000. Hemolysate activates P21RAS in rabbit basilar artery. Life Sci. 67(10):1233–1242. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(00)00710-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Patra A, Satpathy S, Naik PK, Kazi M, Hussain MD.. 2022. Folate receptor-targeted PLGA-PEG nanoparticles for enhancing the activity of genistein in ovarian cancer. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 50(1):228–239. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2022.2118758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Pavese JM, Farmer RL, Bergan RC.. 2010. Inhibition of cancer cell invasion and metastasis by genistein. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 29(3):465–482. doi: 10.1007/s10555-010-9238-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Pellegrino L, Krell J, Roca-Alonso L, Stebbing J, Castellano L.. 2013. MicroRNA-23b regulates cellular architecture and impairs motogenic and invasive phenotypes during cancer progression. Bioarchitecture. 3(4):119–124. doi: 10.4161/bioa.26134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Peng J-H, Zhang F, Zhang H-X, Fan H-Y.. 2009. Prepubertal octylphenol exposure up-regulate BRCA1 expression, down-regulate ERalpha expression and reduce rat mammary tumorigenesis. Cancer Epidemiol. 33(1):51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2009.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Peng J-H, Zhu J-D, Mi M-T, Li F-J, Cai L, Dong J-Z, Zhang H-X, Zhao Y, Xue R-L.. 2010. Prepubertal genistein exposure affects erbB2/Akt signal and reduces rat mammary tumorigenesis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 19(2):110–119. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283362a3e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Po LS, Wang TT, Chen Z-Y, Leung LK.. 2002. Genistein-induced apoptosis in MCF-7 cells involves changes in Bak and Bcl-x without evidence of anti-oestrogenic effects. Br J Nutr. 88(5):463–469. doi: 10.1079/BJN2002693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Pons DG, Nadal-Serrano M, Blanquer-Rossello MM, Sastre-Serra J, Oliver J, Roca P.. 2014. Genistein modulates proliferation and mitochondrial functionality in breast cancer cells depending on ERalpha/ERbeta ratio. J Cell Biochem. 115(5):949–958. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. PRISMA . 2020. Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. http://www.prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA_2020_checklist.docx.
  120. Puar YR, Shanmugam MK, Fan L, Arfuso F, Sethi G, Tergaonkar V.. 2018. Evidence for the involvement of the master transcription factor NF-κB in cancer initiation and progression. Biomedicines. 6(3):82. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines6030082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Rabinovich I, Sebastião APM, Lima RS, Urban CDA, Junior ES, Anselmi KF, Elifio-Esposito S, De Noronha L, Moreno-Amaral AN.. 2018. Cancer stem cell markers ALDH1 and CD44+/CD24− phenotype and their prognosis impact in invasive ductal carcinoma. Eur J Histochem. 62(3):2943. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2018.2943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Rahal OM, Simmen RCM.. 2010. PTEN and p53 cross-regulation induced by soy isoflavone genistein promotes mammary epithelial cell cycle arrest and lobuloalveolar differentiation. Carcinogenesis. 31(8):1491–1500. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Rahman Mazumder MA, Hongsprabhas P.. 2016. Genistein as antioxidant and antibrowning agents in in vivo and in vitro: a review. Biomed Pharmacother. 82:379–392. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Reed SD, Lampe JW, Qu C, Gundersen G, Fuller S, Copeland WK, Newton KM.. 2013. Self-reported menopausal symptoms in a racially diverse population and soy food consumption. Maturitas. 75(2):152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Ricardo S, Vieira AF, Gerhard R, Leitão D, Pinto R, Cameselle-Teijeiro JF, Milanezi F, Schmitt F, Paredes J.. 2011. Breast cancer stem cell markers CD44, CD24 and ALDH1: expression distribution within intrinsic molecular subtype. J Clin Pathol. 64(11):937–946. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2011.090456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Robillard JE, Segar JL.. 2006. Influence of early life events on health and diseases. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 117:313–319. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Salehi B, Prakash Mishra A, Nigam M, Karazhan N, Shukla I, Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz A, Sawicka B, Głowacka A, Abu-Darwish MS, Hussein Tarawneh A, et al. 2021. Ficus plants: state of the art from a phytochemical, pharmacological, and toxicological perspective. Phytother Res. 35(3):1187–1217. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Sathyapalan T, Javed Z, Rigby AS, Kilpatrick ES, Atkin SL.. 2017a. Soy protein improves cardiovascular risk in subclinical hypothyroidism: a randomized double-blinded crossover study. J Endocr Soc. 1(5):423–430. doi: 10.1210/js.2016-1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Sathyapalan T, Manuchehri AM, Thatcher NJ, Rigby AS, Chapman T, Kilpatrick ES, Atkin SL.. 2011. The effect of soy phytoestrogen supplementation on thyroid status and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96(5):1442–1449. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Sathyapalan T, Rigby AS, Bhasin S, Thatcher NJ, Kilpatrick ES, Atkin SL.. 2017b. Effect of soy in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and subclinical hypogonadism: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 102(2):425–433. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Satoh H, Nishikawa K, Suzuki K, Asano R, Virgona N, Ichikawa T, Hagiwara K, Yano T.. 2003. Genistein, a soy isoflavone, enhances necrotic-like cell death in a breast cancer cell treated with a chemotherapeutic agent. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol. 113(114):149–158. – [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Scioli Montoto S, Muraca G, Ruiz ME.. 2020. Solid lipid nanoparticles for drug delivery: pharmacological and biopharmaceutical aspects. Front Mol Biosci. 7:587997. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.587997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Sergeev IN. 2004. Genistein induces Ca2+ -mediated, calpain/caspase-12-dependent apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 321(2):462–467. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.06.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Setchell KD. 1998. Phytoestrogens: the biochemistry, physiology, and implications for human health of soy isoflavones. Am J Clin Nutr. 68(6 Suppl):1333S–1346S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/68.6.1333S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Shao ZM, Wu J, Shen ZZ, Barsky SH.. 1998. Genistein inhibits both constitutive and EGF-stimulated invasion in ER-negative human breast carcinoma cell lines. Anticancer Res. 18(3A):1435–1439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Shen H, He D, Wang S, Ding P, Wang J, Ju J.. 2018. Preparation, characterization, and pharmacokinetics study of a novel genistein-loaded mixed micelles system. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 44(9):1536–1542. doi: 10.1080/03639045.2018.1483384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Shukla RP, Dewangan J, Urandur S, Banala VT, Diwedi M, Sharma S, Agrawal S, Rath SK, Trivedi R, Mishra PR.. 2020. Multifunctional hybrid nanoconstructs facilitate intracellular localization of doxorubicin and genistein to enhance apoptotic and anti-angiogenic efficacy in breast adenocarcinoma. Biomater Sci. 8(5):1298–1315. doi: 10.1039/c9bm01246j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Sotoca AM, Ratman D, van der Saag P, Ström A, Gustafsson JA, Vervoort J, Rietjens IMCM, Murk AJ.. 2008. Phytoestrogen-mediated inhibition of proliferation of the human T47D breast cancer cells depends on the ERalpha/ERbeta ratio. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 112(4-5):171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2008.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Steensma A, Faassen-Peters MAW, Noteborn HPJM, Rietjens IMCM.. 2006. Bioavailability of genistein and its glycoside genistin as measured in the portal vein of freely moving unanesthetized rats. J Agric Food Chem. 54(21):8006–8012. doi: 10.1021/jf060783t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Stingl J, Eaves CJ, Zandieh I, Emerman JT.. 2001. Characterization of bipotent mammary epithelial progenitor cells in normal adult human breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 67(2):93–109. doi: 10.1023/a:1010615124301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Strassburg CP, Manns MP, Tukey RH.. 1998. Expression of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A locus in human colon. Identification and characterization of the novel extrahepatic UGT1A8. J Biol Chem. 273(15):8719–8726. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.15.8719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F.. 2021. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Thannickal VJ, Aldweib KD, Fanburg BL.. 1998. Tyrosine phosphorylation regulates H2O2 production in lung fibroblasts stimulated by transforming growth factor beta1. J Biol Chem. 273(36):23611–23615. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.36.23611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Tharmapalan P, Mahendralingam M, Berman HK, Khokha R.. 2019. Mammary stem cells and progenitors: targeting the roots of breast cancer for prevention. Embo J. 38(14):e100852. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Thomas C, Gustafsson J-Å.. 2011. The different roles of ER subtypes in cancer biology and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 11(8):597–608. doi: 10.1038/nrc3093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Thomsen AR, Almstrup K, Nielsen JE, Sørensen IK, Petersen OW, Leffers H, Breinholt VM.. 2006. Estrogenic effect of soy isoflavones on mammary gland morphogenesis and gene expression profile. Toxicol Sci. 93(2):357–368. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Tophkhane C, Yang S, Bales W, Archer L, Osunkoya A, Thor AD, Yang X.. 2007. Bcl-2 overexpression sensitizes MCF-7 cells to genistein by multiple mechanisms. Int J Oncol. 31(4):867–874. doi: 10.3892/ijo.31.4.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Treeck O, Lattrich C, Springwald A, Ortmann O.. 2010. Estrogen receptor beta exerts growth-inhibitory effects on human mammary epithelial cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 120(3):557–565. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0413-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Upadhyay S, Neburi M, Chinni SR, Alhasan S, Miller F, Sarkar FH.. 2001. Differential sensitivity of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells to genistein is partly mediated by p21(WAF1). Clin Cancer Res. 7(6):1782–1789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Wan MLY, Co VA, El-Nezami H.. 2022. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and breast cancer: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 62(24):6549–6576. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1903382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Warren CM, Jiang J, Gupta RS.. 2020. Epidemiology and Burden of Food Allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 20(2):6. doi: 10.1007/s11882-020-0898-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Wei H, Bowen R, Cai Q, Barnes S, Wang Y.. 1995. Antioxidant and antipromotional effects of the soybean isoflavone genistein. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 208(1):124–130. doi: 10.3181/00379727-208-43844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Wei YK, Gamra I, Davenport A, Lester R, Zhao L, Wei Y.. 2015. Genistein Induces Cytochrome P450 1B1 Gene Expression and Cell Proliferation in Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cells. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 34(2):153–159. doi: 10.1615/jenvironpatholtoxicoloncol.2015013315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Wei Y, Lv J, Guo Y, Bian Z, Gao M, Du H, Yang L, Chen Y, Zhang X, Wang T, et al. 2020. Soy intake and breast cancer risk: a prospective study of 300,000 Chinese women and a dose-response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 35(6):567–578. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00585-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Welty FK, Lee KS, Lew NS, Nasca MM, Zhou J-R.. 2007. The association between soy nut consumption and decreased menopausal symptoms. J Womens Health. 16(3):361–369.). doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Xie Q, Bai Q, Zou L-Y, Zhang Q-Y, Zhou Y, Chang H, Yi L, Zhu J-D, Mi M-T.. 2014. Genistein inhibits DNA methylation and increases expression of tumor suppressor genes in human breast cancer cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 53(5):422–431. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Xu W, Bae EJ, Lee M-K.. 2018. Enhanced anticancer activity and intracellular uptake of paclitaxel-containing solid lipid nanoparticles in multidrug-resistant breast cancer cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 13:7549–7563. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S182621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Xue J-P, Wang G, Zhao Z-B, Wang Q, Shi Y.. 2014. Synergistic cytotoxic effect of genistein and doxorubicin on drug-resistant human breast cancer MCF-7/Adr cells. Oncol Rep. 32(4):1647–1653. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Yamamoto S, Sobue T, Kobayashi M, Sasaki S, Tsugane S.. 2003. Soy, isoflavones, and breast cancer risk in Japan. J Natl Cancer Inst. 95(12):906–913. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.12.906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Yan G-R, Xiao C-L, He G-W, Yin X-F, Chen N-P, Cao Y, He Q-Y.. 2010. Global phosphoproteomic effects of natural tyrosine kinase inhibitor, genistein, on signaling pathways. Proteomics. 10(5):976–986. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Yang X, Belosay A, Hartman JA, Song H, Zhang Y, Wang W, Doerge DR, Helferich WG.. 2015. Dietary soy isoflavones increase metastasis to lungs in an experimental model of breast cancer with bone micro-tumors. Clin Exp Metastasis. 32(4):323–333. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9709-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Yin H, Glass J.. 2011. The phenotypic radiation resistance of CD44+/CD24(-or low) breast cancer cells is mediated through the enhanced activation of ATM signaling. PLoS One. 6(9):e24080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Yoon K, Kwack SJ, Kim HS, Lee B-M.. 2014. Estrogenic endocrine-disrupting chemicals: molecular mechanisms of actions on putative human diseases. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 17(3):127–174. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2014.882194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Zhang FF, Haslam DE, Terry MB, Knight JA, Andrulis IL, Daly MB, Buys SS, John EM.. 2017. Dietary isoflavone intake and all-cause mortality in breast cancer survivors: the Breast Cancer Family Registry. Cancer. 123(11):2070–2079. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Zhang Y-F, Kang H-B, Li B-L, Zhang R-M.. 2012. Positive effects of soy isoflavone food on survival of breast cancer patients in China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 13(2):479–482. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.2.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Zhang X, Powell K, Li L.. 2020. Breast cancer stem cells: biomarkers, identification and isolation methods, regulating mechanisms, cellular origin, and beyond. Cancers. 12(12):3765. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Zhang S, Wang Z, Liu W, Lei R, Shan J, Li L, Wang X.. 2017. Distinct prognostic values of S100 mRNA expression in breast cancer. Sci Rep. 7(1):39786. doi: 10.1038/srep39786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Zhao Q, Zhao M, Parris AB, Xing Y, Yang X.. 2016. Genistein targets the cancerous inhibitor of PP2A to induce growth inhibition and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 49(3):1203–1210. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Ziaei S, Halaby R.. 2017. Dietary isoflavones and breast cancer risk. Medicines. 4(2):18. doi: 10.3390/medicines4020018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Zwicke GL, Mansoori GA, Jeffery CJ.. 2012. Utilizing the folate receptor for active targeting of cancer nanotherapeutics. Nano Rev. 3(1):18496. doi: 10.3402/nano.v3i0.18496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this review were collected from publicly available sources, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, following the PRISMA guidelines. These data consist of published research studies and clinical trial results on genistein and its effects on breast cancer. No new datasets were generated during this study. All data are available in the cited references and can be accessed through the respective databases.


Articles from Pharmaceutical Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES