Skip to main content
Journal of Brown Hospital Medicine logoLink to Journal of Brown Hospital Medicine
. 2024 Jul 1;3(3):118182. doi: 10.56305/001c.118182

Incidental Cutaneous Melanoma

Michael Freddy 1, Michael E Lazarus 1,2, Tyler B Larsen 1,2
PMCID: PMC11864422  PMID: 40026398

Abstract

A young man admitted to the hospital with sepsis and cellulitis was incidentally found to have invasive cutaneous melanoma. Recognition of melanoma is important to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords: melanoma, skin examination, dermatology

Incidental Cutaneous Melanoma

A 34-year-old man chronically experiencing homelessness presented to the hospital with sepsis due to purulent soft tissue infections of both his left hand and right shin. In addition to these infections, he reported a progressively enlarging lesion on his back which bothered him when he slept supine on the ground, as this caused it to bleed. A detailed skin examination was performed, and a three-centimeter pedunculated, irregularly shaped, spontaneously bleeding nodule was noted on his midback (Figure 1). This lesion was accompanied by adjacent, irregularly spaced erythematous papulonodules, suspicious for satellite lesions. Dermatologic consultation was obtained and after discussion with the patient, a narrow excisional biopsy of the primary lesion was performed. Hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical staining of the biopsy revealed invasive nodular melanoma (Breslow depth > 10mm) with at least 4 mitoses per millimeter and as many as 10 mitoses in hotspots (Figure 2). The suspicious satellite lesions were not biopsied, and the biopsy was unable to confirm vascular invasion. The patient initially expressed interest in arranging outpatient follow up care and was referred for wide local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Despite several discussions with inpatient and ambulatory providers, however, he ultimately declined follow up for his melanoma and he was unfortunately lost to follow up.

Figure 1. Irregularly-shaped, spontaneously bleeding nodule on the midback associated with erythematous papule satellite lesions. Biopsy of the nodule confirmed invasive cutaneous melanoma.

Figure 1.

Figure 2. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical stains of the nodular lesion (all images at 40x). Panel A. H&E stain. Panel B. S100 stain. Panel C. HMA45 stain. Panel D. Melan-A/MART-1 stain.

Figure 2.

Melanoma is a malignant neoplasm originating from melanin pigment producing melanocytes.1 As most melanocytes exist in the basal layer of the epidermis, greater than 90% of all melanomas are cutaneous melanomas, though melanoma can originate in other tissues (e.g. mucosal, uveal).1,2 In 2024, an estimated 100,640 patients in the United States will be diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma, with an estimated 8290 patients dying of the disease.3 The incidence of melanoma has risen steadily since the 1950s, likely due to increases in diagnosis but also from increases in certain risk factors such as exposure to ultraviolet radiation through unprotected sun exposure, sunburns, and tanning beds.1,2 Other risk factors for melanoma include male sex, high nevus counts, atypical nevi, and two or more first-degree relatives with melanoma.1,4 Breslow thickness, a measurement of how far the melanoma has invaded the body on a biopsied specimen, remains an important piece of melanoma staging due to its prognostic reliability as a greater Breslow thickness is more often associated with a worse prognosis due to higher disease burden and risk of spread.5,6 Advanced, unresectable, or metastatic cutaneous melanoma historically carried a high mortality rate, however the advent of effective systemic therapies, particularly checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, specifically BRAF and MEK inhibitors, has markedly improved prognosis.1,4,7

While most cutaneous melanomas are detected by physician skin examinations, there is no strong evidence to recommend routine screening.1,8 Patients who do not routinely access care or who have lesions in areas that are not easily self-examined may be less likely to recognize melanoma and it is important for hospitalists to refer suspicious lesions for timely diagnosis and treatment. Patients experiencing homelessness are a particularly vulnerable population who are more likely to be diagnosed with cutaneous malignancies compared to those not experiencing homelessness.9 Performing skin biopsies in acute care settings remains controversial, though it is important to note that for a variety of cutaneous diseases, dermatologic specialist consultation in the hospital is associated with higher diagnostic accuracy and improved outcomes including lower lengths of stay, rates of readmission, and cost.10,11 Hospitalists encountering lesions suspicious for melanoma, particularly in vulnerable populations, should engage patients in shared decision making, alongside expert consultation when appropriate, to decide if a particular lesion should be biopsied in the acute care setting as a part of the timely diagnosis and treatment referral process.

Author Contributions

All authors have reviewed the final manuscript prior to submission. All the authors have contributed significantly to the manuscript, per the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors criteria of authorship.

  • Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND

  • Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND

  • Final approval of the version to be published; AND

  • Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest

Corresponding Author

Tyler Larsen, MD, FACP

11301 Wilshire Blvd Building 500, Suite 3214-B

Los Angeles, CA 90073

Email: tlarsen@mednet.ucla.edu

References

  1. Cutaneous melanoma [published correction appears in Lancet. 2023 Aug 5;402(10400):450] Long G. V., Swetter S. M., Menzies A. M., Gershenwald J. E., Scolyer R. A. 2023Lancet. 402(10400):485–502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00821-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00821-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. The World of Melanoma: Epidemiologic, Genetic, and Anatomic Differences of Melanoma Across the Globe. Dimitriou F., Krattinger R., Ramelyte E.., et al. Sep 24;2018 Curr Oncol Rep. 20(11):87. doi: 10.1007/s11912-018-0732-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0732-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cancer statistics, 2024. Siegel R.L., Giaquinto A.N., Jemal A. 2024CA Cancer J Clin. 74(1):12–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Melanoma: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and classification. Rastrelli M., Tropea S., Rossi C. R., Alaibac M. 2014In Vivo. 28(6):1005–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. The eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system: implications for melanoma treatment and care. Keung E.Z., Gershenwald J.E. Aug;2018 Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 18(8):775–784. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1489246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2018.1489246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up. Papageorgiou C., Apalla Z., Manoli S. M., Lallas K., Vakirlis E., Lallas A. Jul 1;2021 Dermatol Pract Concept. 11(Suppl 1):e2021162S. doi: 10.5826/dpc.11S1a162S. https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.11S1a162S [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Targeting BRAF and MEK inhibitors in melanoma in the metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. Tétu P., Baroudjian B., Lebbe C. 2020Curr Opin Oncol. 32(2):85–90. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000614. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Screening for melanoma. Collins M.K., Secrest A.M., Ferris L.K. 2014Melanoma Res. 24(5):428–436. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000104. https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dermatologic care in the homeless and underserved populations: observations from the Venice Family Clinic. Grossberg A.L., Carranza D., Lamp K., Chiu M.W., Lee C., Craft N. Jan;2012 Cutis. 89(1):25–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Inpatient Consultative Dermatology. Biesbroeck L. K., Shinohara M. M. Nov;2015 Med Clin North Am. 99(6):1349–64. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.06.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2015.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Association of Dermatology Consultations With Patient Care Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Skin Diseases. Milani-Nejad N., Zhang M., Kaffenberger B.H. Jun 1;2017 JAMA Dermatol. 153(6):523–528. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.6130. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.6130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Brown Hospital Medicine are provided here courtesy of Department of Medicine of Alpert Medical School of Brown University

RESOURCES