ABSTRACT
Phosphatidylinositol, a glycerophospholipid with a myo‐inositol head group, can form seven different phosphoinositides (PItds) by phosphorylation at inositol carbons 3, 4 and/or 5. Over 50 kinases and phosphatases participate in PItd metabolism, creating an interconnected PItd network that allows for precise temporal and spatial regulation of PItd levels. We review paradigms of PItd action, including (1) the establishment of subcellular organelle identity by the acquisition of specific PItd signatures, permitting regulation of key processes of cell biology including trafficking (exocytosis, clathrin‐dependent and ‐independent endocytosis, formation and function of membrane contact sites, cytoskeletal remodeling), (2) signaling through phospholipase C cleavage of phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate to inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate and DAG, and (3) roles of PItds in molecular transport at membrane contact sites. To date, variants in 34 genes of PItd metabolism account for at least 41 distinguishable monogenic conditions. Clinical presentations of these disorders produce a broad and often multisystemic spectrum of effects. The nervous system is often involved, and muscular, immunological, skeletal, renal, ophthalmologic and dermatologic features occur in several conditions. Some syndromes involving PItd metabolism can be distinguished clinically, but most diagnoses currently result from broad molecular diagnostic testing performed for the patient's presenting clinical complaint. Genetic disorders of PItd metabolism are a broad, expanding and challenging category of inborn errors. Challenges include improved documentation of the clinical spectra, development of broad biochemical diagnostic methods for these conditions and better understanding of the PItd networks in different cells and subcellular compartments necessary for the development of disease‐specific therapies.
Keywords: cellular trafficking, inborn error of metabolism, inherited metabolic disease, phosphatidylinositol, phosphoinositide, polyphosphoinositide
Abbreviations
- CCV
clathrin‐coated vesicle
- CDP‐DAG
CDP‐diacylglycerol
- CDS
CDP‐diacylglycerol synthase
- DAG
diacylglycerol
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- FA
fatty acid
- GDPIM
genetic disorder of phosphoinositide metabolism
- GPCR
G‐protein coupled receptor
- GPI
glycosylphosphatidylinositol
- IP3
inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate
- LTP
lipid transfer protein
- MCS
membrane contact site
- PHTS
PTEN‐hamartoma tumor syndrome
- PI
phosphatidylinositol
- PI(3,4,5)P3
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5‐trisphosphate
- PI(3,4)P2
phosphatidylinositol 3,4‐bisphosphate
- PI(3,5)P2
phosphatidylinositol 3,5‐bisphosphate
- PI3P
phosphatidylinositol 3‐phosphate
- PI(4,5)P2
phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate
- PI4P
phosphatidylinositol 4‐phosphate
- PI5P
phosphatidylinositol 5‐phosphate
- PIS
phosphatidylinositol synthase
- PItd(s)
phosphoinositide(s)
- PITP
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein
- PLA2
phospholipase A2
- PLC
phospholipase C
- PROS
PIK3CA‐related overgrowth spectrum
1. Introduction
Phosphatidylinositol (PI) and its phosphorylated derivatives (phosphoinositides [PItds]) are essential for the function of all eukaryotic cells [1]. Despite the wealth of basic research into PItd biology and the identification of over 41 PItd‐related inborn errors, this field is little known to most metabolic physicians, and the bridge between PItd physiology and clinical manifestation is often incompletely understood. In this review, we briefly summarize PItd metabolism and its roles in cell physiology, membrane biology and vesicular trafficking. Then we describe the known genetic disorders of PItd metabolism, henceforth abbreviated GDPIMs.
2. Phosphoinositide Metabolism
PI plays multiple roles in biology (Box 1). PItds were first identified for their role in cell signaling and have since been recognized to control important steps of membrane and vesicular trafficking through the recruitment of different effector proteins [2]. PI is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in two steps: CDP‐diacylglycerol synthase (CDS) converts phosphatidic acid and CTP into CDP‐diacylglycerol (CDP‐DAG), then phosphatidylinositol synthase (PIS) converts CDP‐DAG and inositol into PI [3, 4]. PI then is transported from the ER to other organelles or to the plasma membrane by vesicular transport or by lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) such as PI transfer proteins (PITP) found at membrane contact sites [2, 5, 6]. Two main models of PITP function are described: a transport model, in which PITP directly transfers PItd from the ER to the receiving membrane; and a presentation model, in which PITP presents the PItd to kinases for phosphorylation. This last model may explain how some kinases that are inhibited under most experimental conditions can phosphorylate substrates presented in this fashion, allowing for refined control of PItd signaling [5].
BOX 1. Inositol and phosphoinositides (PItds).
Inositol is a six‐carbon molecule synthesized from glucose‐6‐phosphate by isomerization to inositol‐3‐phosphate by inositol synthase, Ino1 (MIPS1). Dephosphorylation produces free inositol [7]. In humans, most inositol comes from endogenous synthesis (~ 4 g/day), especially in the kidney; about 1 g/day comes from the diet [7]. Inositol is also produced from the degradation of phosphoinositides (PItds).
Myoinositol and other variants of inositol. Each carbon atom of inositol has one hydroxyl group (Box Figure A) and one hydrogen group, oriented in the opposite direction to the hydroxyl with respect to the plane of the molecule (not shown). Chemical variants of inositol are defined by the positions of each hydroxyl group relative to the plane of the molecule. The most prevalent form in biology is myo‐inositol (shown), which is the only form discussed further in this article and will henceforth be designated as “inositol.” Figure B is a mnemonic to recall the positions of the hydroxyl groups in myoinositol. Bernard Agranoff likened this molecule to a swimming turtle [8], with head, forelimbs and tail raised (i.e., carbons 1, 2, 3 and 5), but hindlimbs (i.e., carbons 4 and 6) pointing downward.
Structure of phosphatidylinositol. Box Figure A schematically shows a PI molecule. The phosphate (red circle), glycerol (red lines) and esterified fatty acids (FAs, black) are shown in relation to inositol (green).
Fatty acid composition of PI. In cells, the FAs of PI are embedded in the cytoplasmic leaflet of cellular membranes. The FAs are esterified to the first and second carbon atoms of a glycerol molecule, together forming the diacylglycerol (DAG) moiety of the PI molecule. The first glycerol carbon is usually esterified to a saturated fatty acid (FA), typically stearic acid (C18:0, octadecanoic acid); the second carbon, to a polyunsaturated FA such as arachidonic acid (C20:4, i.e., 20 carbon atoms and 4 unsaturated bonds, at positions 5–6, 8–9, 11–12 and 14–15, i.e., 5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z‐eicosatetraenoic acid). Using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, the total number of carbon atoms and the number of double bonds in the fatty acid molecules can be determined, but the two FAs cannot be differentiated individually by most instruments. Hence, for example, a common DAG species that has one 18:0 and one 20:4 FA will be designated as “C38:4,” reflecting the sums of carbon atoms and of double bonds of the two FA molecules.
Phosphoinositides. In PI, carbon 1 of inositol is ester‐bound to the phosphate of the phosphatidic acid moiety. Hydroxyl groups 3, 4 and 5 (i.e., the left limbs and tail of the turtle) project from the cytoplasmic surfaces of membranes. Each of these positions can be phosphorylated, in any combination, for a total of seven different PI species. Inositol is thus the most diverse head group among cellular phospholipids. Figure A also shows the site of action of phospholipase C (PLC). Cleavage of PI(4,5)P2 by phospholipase C (PLC, shown) produces two biologically important products, free inositol 1,4,5‐phosphate (IP3) and a membrane‐bound diacylglycerol (DAG). This important reaction of cell signaling is discussed later.
Other functions of inositol. Physiologically, free inositol is an endogenous osmol [7]. Another important function not further detailed in this article is the use of membrane PI to anchor the synthesis of polysaccharide chains for N‐linked protein glycosylation (GPI anchors) [9].
Phosphorylation of PI into PItd occurs mostly after PI transport from the ER to the cytosolic surface of the plasma membrane or other organelles. Multiple kinases and phosphatases act to phosphorylate and dephosphorylate, respectively, the inositol ring [3, 10, 11]. The phosphatidic acid moiety of PI binds at the D1 position of the inositol ring (Box 1), and phosphorylation can occur at the D3, D4 and/or D5 positions. There are seven possible species of PItd (Figure 1): phosphatidylinositol 3‐phosphate (PI3P), phosphatidylinositol 4‐phosphate (PI4P), phosphatidylinositol 5‐phosphate (PI5P), phosphatidylinositol 3,4‐bisphosphate (PI(3,4)P2), phosphatidylinositol 3,5‐bisphosphate (PI(3,5)P2), phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5‐trisphosphate (PI(3,4,5)P3) [2, 4]. Each PItd can undergo multiple phosphorylation or dephosphorylation events and be converted to any other PItd (Figure 1), making their cellular levels highly interdependent [2, 10]. Activity of phospholipase C (PLC), a part of many transduction pathways, releases the second messengers inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate (IP3) and DAG, which can eventually be recycled into PI (Figure 2) [2, 3].
FIGURE 1.

Phosphoinositide metabolism. Reactions and enzymes of the PI‐PItd network [12, 13]. At many steps, different enzymes can catalyze the same generic reaction, but this overview does not consider the differing organelle expression patterns of the individual enzymes. Asterisks indicate interaction with VAC14, a protein that complexes with both PIKFyve and FIG4. Another accessory protein, HYCC1, a regulator of PI4P synthesis required to localize PI4K at the plasma membrane, is not illustrated.
FIGURE 2.

PI—PI(4,5)P2 cycle. The PI—PI(4,5)P2 cycle is a paradigm of cell signaling [2, 3]. (A) Activation of phospholipase C (PLC). Typically, an extracellular signaling molecule stimulates a G‐protein‐coupled transmembrane receptor. Receptor activation leads to GTP binding, which activates membrane PLC. (B) Signaling. The plasma membrane contains locally synthesized PI(4,5)P2. PLC‐mediated cleavage of PI(4,5)P2 generates diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate (IP3) moieties, both of which are biologically active. The DAG remains membrane‐bound and enhances the localization of protein kinase C (PKC) to the plasma membrane, activating PKC. IP3 is released into the cytoplasm and can bind receptors (IP3Rs) on smooth ER, which are calcium channels. IP3 binding stimulates calcium release to the cytoplasm. Calcium has multiple actions, including synergistic further activation of DAG‐bound PKC. PKC can phosphorylate a set of effector proteins. (C) Inactivation and recycling. IP3 is inactivated by dephosphorylation, producing inositol. DAG is inactivated to PA. These molecular remains can be used in the ER for resynthesis of PI, then transported to the Golgi by lipid transport proteins (LTPs), where re‐phosphorylation can occur. Abbreviations: CDP, cytidine diphosphate; CTP, cytidine triphosphate; PA, phosphatidic acid.
Together, PI and PItds represent 10–15 mol% of the total phospholipid content in an average cell [4, 14]. PI alone accounts for about 90–95 mol% of this pool [15]. PI4P and PI(4,5)P2 are the most abundant PItds, each representing about 2–5 mol% of the total. The other PItd species are rarer, with PI3P representing 0.2 to 0.5 mol% of the total, PI(3,4)P2 less than 0.1 mol%, PI(3,4,5)P3 less than 0.05 mol%, PI(3,5)P2 0.05 to 0.1 mol%, and PI5P 0.01 mol% of the total PI plus PItd content [4, 6, 16, 17]. More important than their overall abundance, the concentrations of specific PItds in localized membrane regions can regulate important cell processes [10]. Table 1 summarizes PItd levels and intracellular localization and provides some examples of their function. Although PI synthesized in the ER is required for PItd synthesis, it can be found in high levels only in some membranes, such as the Golgi, peroxisomes, and outer mitochondrial membrane. Other membranes, such as the plasma membrane, are relatively depleted of PI despite maintaining substantial amounts of PItd. This suggests a dependence on sustained transport of PI from the ER for maintenance of PItd concentration in membranes [18].
TABLE 1.
Phosphoinositide abundance, localization, and primary functions.
| Phosphoinositide | Fraction of PI + PItds (mol%) | Localization | Examples of functions |
|---|---|---|---|
| PI | 90–95 |
ER Also present in Golgi |
PItd precursor |
| PI3P | 0.2–0.5 |
Early endosomes Possibly ER, Golgi |
Autophagy, early endosome and phagosome maturation, endosome fusion/trafficking, retrograde transport |
| PI4P | 2–5 |
Trans‐Golgi, endosomes Also present in plasma membrane |
Vesicle budding and clathrin adaptor recruitment, maintenance of Golgi structure |
| PI5P | 0.01 |
Debated Highest in plasma membrane, enriched in ER, Golgi, early endosomes, present in nuclear envelope |
Apoptosis, stress signaling, potential nuclear functions |
| PI(3,4)P2 | < 0.1 | Plasma membrane, endosomes | Cell migration/adhesion/invasion, endocytosis |
| PI(3,5)P2 | 0.05–0.1 | Late endosomes, lysosomes | Cargo sorting in late endosomes or internal vesicle of multivesicular bodies |
| PI(4,5)P2 | 2–5 |
Plasma membrane Small amounts in Golgi, endolysosomal system |
Exocytosis, autophagy, clathrin‐dependent endocytosis, cytoskeletal organization, regulation of multiple proteins/receptors |
| PI(3,4,5)P3 | < 0.05 |
Plasma membrane Also in some endocytic compartments |
Cell growth and survival, apoptosis, transcription/translation, adhesion, cell polarity/movement/chemotaxis |
The expression of PItd in organelles is tightly regulated and results in local enrichment of specific PItd species at precise sites of intracellular and plasma membranes (Figure 3) [2, 25], a key factor in defining organelle identity. Some properties of PItds make them particularly effective for this function: as other phospholipids, they can quickly diffuse laterally in membranes (but are not as easily transported between membranes), and can rapidly be converted from one to another [25]. As vesicular trafficking proceeds, recruitment of PI kinases and phosphatases allows for changes in PItd composition, activating different effector proteins necessary for that phase of trafficking. For example, at fusion, membrane PItds direct the recruitment and the retention of effector proteins [2], both in the carrier vesicle and in the acceptor membrane. After fusion, shifts in PItd levels, due to dilution of the transported PItds in the acceptor membrane and to the action of different phosphatases and kinases in the new compartment, create a different environment [25]. This dynamic interconversion of PItds allows for conservation of organelle identity despite a high flux of membrane traffic [2].
FIGURE 3.

Intracellular distribution of PI and PItds. This schematic figure depicts only the major PItd domains [2, 21, 22]. In most membranes, the main species is PI, with small amounts of different PItds. PI synthesis mainly occurs in the ER (denoted in yellow). The Golgi is enriched in PI4P. In exocytosis, the production of PI(4,5)P2 at the neck of exocytotic vesicles is shown. Its presence leads to the accumulation of proteins that surround and narrow the neck of the vesicle, which can control the release of vesicular content (e.g., of insulin) [23]. Uptake and transport via clathrin‐coated vesicles (CCV) also require PI(4,5)P2 [2]. In endocytosis, PI3P is prominent. Vesicles of the lysosomal system accumulate PI(3,5)P2, shown for multivesicular bodies (MVB) and lysosomes. PI(3,4,5)P3 levels are high at the edge of extended cell processes and membrane ruffles during chemotaxis or the phagocytic cup. Mitochondrial membranes contain some PI(4,5)P2, but the import of PI4P from lysosomes and the Golgi as well as PI3P from endosomes at mitochondria‐associated membranes (MAMs) is important in mitophagy [24]. In the nucleus, non‐membrane‐bound PIP accounts for about half of the total PIP content.
The regulation of PItd localization depends upon many factors [10], including the availability of a precursor PItd and the action of adaptor proteins to recruit the necessary PI kinases and phosphatases to the right cellular location [26]. Membrane curvature and fatty acid composition can also affect PItd kinases and phosphatases [27]. Conversely, effector proteins may affect PItd metabolism: some PI(4,5)P2 effector proteins recruit specific kinases that enhance PI(4,5)P2 synthesis, allowing for further activation of effectors and creating a local amplification loop [28].
The fatty acids (FAs) of PItds can influence function. The most prevalent FA composition of PItds is a stearic acid (18:0) in the sn‐1 position and an arachidonic acid (20:4) in the sn‐2 position (1‐stearoyl‐2‐arachidonyl‐PI), representing 40% to 85% of PI, depending on cell type. De novo synthesized PI shows a diverse pool of acyl chains, suggesting that enrichment for certain FAs is required and likely occurs by remodeling through the Lands cycle of FA cleavage and ligation. The cycle is mediated by several acyltransferases, including MBOAT7 (LPIAT; lysophospholipid acyltransferase), LCLAT1 (ALCAT1: lysocardiolipin acyltransferase) and also phospholipases A1 and A2 [3]. Nevertheless, specific acyl chains are required in some instances, such as saturated acyl chain PI(4,5)P2 for activation of the Kir2.1 channel, and the preference of seipin for PI3P with unsaturated acyl chains [29]. The cleavage and liberation of FA from PI/PItds can influence cell function. One example is the regulation of leukotriene biosynthesis by pools of free arachidonic acid that can derive from cleavage of PI or PItd [30].
Most of the steps of the network linking the seven different PItds can be catalyzed by more than one kinase or phosphatase (Figure 1) [10, 11]. What is the function of this high degree of redundancy? One suggestion is that it may provide a built‐in compensation for defects in the pathway. However, the finding that many GDPIMs arise from single enzyme modifications in this pathway suggests that compensation is partial at best. In another model, the action of individual kinases and phosphatases may be necessary only in specific subcellular locations or under specific conditions (e.g., cell type, physiological state). Several factors may influence this phenomenon: organelle‐specific targeting; cell‐specific or developmental window‐specific expression or regulation; and/or repressed expression of functionally redundant enzymes [10, 31].
3. Roles of Phosphoinositides
PItds function by binding and retaining cytosolic proteins or cytosolic domains of membrane proteins in a time‐ and location‐specific manner [6], generally through electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged phosphorylated PItd head group. Over 400 such PItd‐binding proteins were identified in one proteomic study [32]. Motifs that interact with PItd include Pleckstrin homology (PH), FYVE, or Phos homology (PX) domains [4, 25]. In addition, certain clusters of polybasic amino acids serve as non‐canonical PItd‐binding sites [25]. In general, binding between PItd and an effector protein is of low affinity. Affinity increases in the presence of additional factors, including other proteins and lipids. This phenomenon, by which the combination of different but nearly simultaneous signals greatly increases the chance of a biological response, is termed coincidence detection; it allows for both compartment specificity and rapid modulation of the response [2, 6, 25]. For example, sorting nexins bind to PItd through a PX domain and also contain a BAR domain allowing for sensing of membrane curvature [6]. The combination of both PItd binding and the correct membrane curvature suffices to activate sorting nexin 9, an essential step of exo‐endocytic budding and fusion [6]. Similarly, the presence of hydrophobic residues in the protein may allow for partial entry of the protein into the membrane, which may further stabilize the structure [25].
Some PItd‐binding proteins function by competitive inhibition, making PItd unavailable to the effector proteins. For example, although PI(4,5)P2 is relatively abundant in the plasma membrane, proteins such as MARCKS, GAP43 and CAP23 sequester as much as two thirds of the total PI(4,5)P2 pool. Small changes in total PI(4,5)P2 levels may substantially change the levels of free PI(4,5)P2, its availability and physiologic effects [28].
PItds participate in many physiological reactions. An exhaustive catalogue is beyond the scope of this article. However, some examples are presented to illustrate general paradigms by which PItds influence cell physiology and transport.
3.1. Phosphoinositides in Cell Signaling
PItds regulate signal transduction and cytoplasmic calcium levels. Cleavage of PI(4,5)P2 by phospholipase C (PLC) releases inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate (IP3), a soluble second messenger that stimulates intracellular calcium release from the ER. Breakdown of PItds by phospholipase A2 (PLA2) similarly releases signaling metabolites (a FA, typically arachidonate, and sn‐2 lyso‐PItd) [25]. Different PItds affect signal transduction differently. For instance, phosphorylation of PI(4,5)P2 to PI(3,4,5)P3 enhances growth factor signaling, whereas dephosphorylation of PI(4,5)P2 by PI 5‐phosphatases inhibits this by decreasing PI(4,5)P2 availability [25]. Similarly, in insulin signaling, transient increases of PItds, including PI(3,4,5)P3, activate Akt, increasing glucose uptake through GLUT4 trafficking and, in liver and muscle, reducing gluconeogenesis and increasing glycogen and lipid synthesis [26]. Exocytic roles of PItds (discussed later) also impact insulin release and GLUT4 trafficking [26]. PItds can regulate G‐protein coupled receptor signaling (GPCR), affecting the association of GPCRs with G proteins, kinases and other proteins, and activating downstream proteins [29].
Phosphoinositides can also act through allosteric activation of different membrane proteins, including channels and transporters. For example, for some potassium channels (e.g., Kir2.1), PI(4,5)P2 binding at the interface between the cytosolic and transmembrane domains enhances the opening of the channel [6]. Some ion channels interact with multiple PItds; others interact with only one. This specificity may be useful in suppressing the activity of ion channels during their synthesis in the ER and trafficking to their final target membrane, where channel activity could be toxic, with activation occurring only in the target membrane that contains the PItd profile required for activation [33].
3.2. Phosphoinositides in Inter‐Organellar Trafficking
Vesicular trafficking is intimately linked to PItds, which are central to various steps of endocytosis and exocytosis, from budding initiation to membrane fusion [2]. For example, the transport of vesicles from the trans‐Golgi involves the recruitment of GOLPH3 by PI4P, which promotes binding to myosin 18A and F‐actin, producing the conditions necessary for transport from the Golgi [34].
Membrane contact sites (MCS) ensure proximity between membranes of two organelles, allowing for lipid, protein and small metabolite exchanges [2, 35]. For example, at ER‐Golgi MCSs, the protein OBSP binds both to membrane proteins of the ER and to PI4P in the Golgi. OBSP‐mediated cholesterol transport to the Golgi is powered by a cycle of PI4P phosphorylation and dephosphorylation and the concentration gradient that this creates (Figure 4). Once in the ER, PI4P is dephosphorylated by SACM1L and recycled to the Golgi where PI4P is resynthesized. A similar exchange of PI4P and phosphatidylserine occurs through the action of ORP5 and ORP8 at ER‐plasma membrane MCSs [35]. PI4P phosphorylation at each membrane is performed by different kinases: in mouse Schwann cells, deletion of PI4KA, which is present at the plasma membrane under normal conditions, resulted in a significant decrease in phosphatidylserine but not phosphatidylethanolamine and sphingomyelin contents [37]. On the other hand, inactivation of PI4KB, which is located in the Golgi, resulted in significant cholesterol, phosphatidylethanolamine and sphingomyelin depletion but without a significant decrease in phosphatidylserine content [38]. Those results are consistent with previous work which demonstrates that the transport of PI4P from the plasma membrane to the ER drives the counter‐transport of phosphatidylserine from the ER to the plasma membrane at ER‐plasma membrane contact sites [39]. By the same token, those studies [37, 38] conclude that PI4KA and PI4KB contribute differently to myelination of the peripheral nervous system. As for PI3P, interaction of protrudin with PI3P and RAB7 allows for the formation of MCSs between the ER and late endosomes, and recruits kinesin‐1, which moves the endosome towards the plasma membrane [35].
FIGURE 4.

PItd‐mediated lipid transport at membrane contact sites (MCS). A PI‐PI4P cycle regulates lipid transport at sites of membrane proximity [2, 36]. (A) PI phosphorylation and dephosphorylation power a cycle of membrane transport. A PI4P gradient is maintained between Golgi and ER, in part by PI transport from the ER to Golgi followed by PI4P synthesis in the Golgi. Lipid transport proteins such as oxysterol binding protein (OSBP) can transport PI4P down the resulting concentration gradient to the ER, where it is dephosphorylated to PI then returned to the Golgi by another transporter. Such LTPs bind to PI4P on the Golgi and VAP on the ER. (B) Cargoes of OSBP. The pathway to the ER with PI4P is described above. Returning to the Golgi, OSBP transports a cholesterol molecule. Phosphatidylserine is transported in an analogous fashion (not shown). Abbreviations: Nir2, N‐terminal domain‐Interacting Receptor, also known as Phosphatidylinositol Transfer Protein, Membrane‐Associated 1 or PITPNM1; SACM1L, Suppressor of Actin mutations 1‐like; VAP, Vesical‐associated membrane protein (VAMP)‐associated protein.
Vesicle formation is also assisted by PItds. For example, the activation of epsins and other proteins by PI(4,5)P2 promotes the formation of membrane tubules which can become vesicles. PItds participate in cytoskeletal remodeling (section 3.4) and membrane remodeling, notably through the interaction of PI(4,5)P2 with N‐WASP and the Arp2/3 complex [28]. Finally, the interaction of PItds with sorting nexins allows for the regulation of trafficking between different compartments, as with PI(4,5)P2, SNX5 and the targeting of E‐cadherin from endosomes to lysosomes for degradation [28].
3.2.1. Exocytosis
Several steps in exocytosis depend upon PItd metabolism. The exocyst, an eight‐subunit complex required for constitutive exocytosis, is regulated by PI4P and Rab11, although the extent of the mechanisms by which PI4P operates is yet to be fully characterized. It binds the exocytic vesicles to the plasma membrane by binding with PI(4,5)P2 [2]. For example, in epithelial cells, synthesis of PI(4,5)P2 by PIP5K1ɣ, recruits the exocyst complex at the plasma membrane, which allows delivery of E‐cadherin to adherens junctions, and acts on talin, allowing for the remodeling of the cells' leading edge [28]. Domains of high concentration of PI(4,5)P2 have been identified in neuroendocrine cells at the sites of exocytosis. The mechanisms underlying the formation of these PI(4,5)P2 clusters are incompletely understood, but involve multiple PI kinases and phosphatases, PLC, and other factors [40]. Exocytosis and membrane fusion require PI(4,5)P2‐mediated recruitment of multiple effector proteins regulating SNARE function, including CAPS, Munc13 and synaptotagmin‐1. Syntaxin‐1, a protein that clusters in the presence of moderate levels of PI(4,5)P2, is felt to have roles in vesicle docking and fusion, allowing for a favorable membrane curvature [40].
3.2.2. Endocytosis
The endosomal system is particularly enriched in PI3P, which is required for many functions, from endosomal fusion to sorting as well as the formation of intraluminal vesicles in multivesicular bodies [21]. Several events of PItd interconversion are required during the endocytic process: conversion from PI(4,5)P2 to PI(3,4)P2 allows for the maturation of clathrin‐coated vesicles; conversion of PI3P to PI(3,5)P2 promotes maturation and degradative sorting of the endosomes [41].
Clathrin‐coated vesicle (CCV) formation and transport involves multiple PItd kinases and phosphatases including synaptojanin (SYNJ1/2), INPPL1 (SHIP2), PIK3C2A, OCRL and INPP4A [2, 21]. The first steps of CCV formation involve PI(4,5)P2 (Figure 5). PI(4,5)P2 is also critical for the recruitment and activation of other proteins in the initial stages of clathrin coat assembly, including epsins, dynamin, β‐arrestin, Numb and Dab2, as well as BAR domain proteins [21, 28]. The increased levels of PI(4,5)P2 permit AP‐2 assembly at the membrane, then, clathrin triskeles surround the AP‐2 and membrane core. Both clathrin and AP‐2 permit the recruitment of various proteins, including PItd kinases and phosphatases. For example, AP‐2 recognition of PI(4,5)P2 at the plasma membrane recruits PIP5K1, allowing for a further local increase of the PI(4,5)P2 pool and accelerating the nucleation process. As the CCV grows, the clathrin lattice stabilizes and displaces PIP5K1, reducing PI(4,5)P2 level. Then, PI 5‐phosphatases synaptojanin and INPPL1, recruited during CCV maturation, convert PI(4,5)P2 into PI4P, and clathrin recruits PI3KC2α for the conversion of PI4P into PI(3,4)P2 [21]. PI3KC2α is an autoinhibited kinase, but the binding of its PX and C2 domains to PI(4,5)P2 at the plasma membrane unmasks its enzymatic activity, permitting the synthesis of PI(3,4)P2. This PI(3,4)P2 is required for constriction at the neck of the invaginated membrane through the recruitment of proteins SNX8 and SNX19, important intermediates in the process. Fission of the CCV also requires dynamin, which in turn requires PI(4,5)P2 at the neck of invaginated CCVs. Synaptojanin may support dynamin by preferentially hydrolyzing PI(4,5)P2 in highly curved membranes such as the neck of the budding CCVs. In contrast, less PI(4,5)P2 is hydrolyzed adjacent to the neck, facilitating fission [21]. Clathrin uncoating by auxilin relies on PI(3,4)P2 and endocytic proteins. The presence of PI(3,4)P2 may also be the precursor of PI3P in endosomes, possibly through the activity of INPP4A and INPP4B [21, 43]. Thus, a single subcellular structure is sequentially dependent on different PItds that recruit the proteins necessary to complete the phases of this critical form of membrane trafficking.
FIGURE 5.

Clathrin‐coated vesicle formation and PItd. PItds direct much of cellular membrane traffic. This example illustrates PI(4,5)P2 levels and their role in the early phase of development of clathrin‐coated vesicles (CCVs). The synthesis of PI(4,5)P2 molecules (red) in the cytoplasmic leaflet of the plasma membrane confers a low affinity for AP2 monomers. PI(4,5)P2 binding is brief and weak. The membrane concentration of PI(4,5)P2 is critical because binding to a second PI(4,5)P2 molecule retains AP2 for longer in this position. Above a certain level of PI(4,5)P2, the process proceeds rapidly. Clathrin binding to two AP2 molecules further stabilizes this structure. AP2‐clathrin units may coalesce with similar units. An increasingly robust clathrin‐AP2 network forms, imposing curvature upon the membrane and creating a clathrin‐coated vesicle. The crucial initial steps occur within seconds [42]. Compared with the morphologically spectacular accumulation of structural proteins, membrane PI(4,5)P2 levels are easy to overlook, but they provide the critical trigger for the entire process. As the CCV matures, the transition to other PItds such as PI4P and PI(3,4)P2 will direct the separation of the CCV from the plasma membrane and vesicle uncoating [21]. This and other membrane pathways controlled by PItd levels are reviewed elsewhere [2]. Abbreviation: AP2, adaptor protein molecule 2.
Clathrin‐independent endocytosis also relies on PItds, although in less documented fashions than for CCVs. PI(4,5)P2 accumulates at the rim of caveolae, plasma membrane invaginations produced by caveolins. PI(3,4,5)P3 occurs at sites of internalization of the interleukin‐2 receptor. PI(4,5)P2 and possibly PI(3,4)P2 are implicated in the CLIC pathway responsible for endocytosis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor proteins from the plasma membrane [21]. Macropinocytosis, allowing for uptake of nutrients and other molecules into cells, involves several PI kinases and phosphatases including PIP5K1α/ɣ, PI3Ks, INPP5D (SHIP1), INPPL1 (SHIP2), INPP4A/B, MTMR6 and PLC, similar to those involved in phagosome formation described below [2, 44].
Several steps of phagosome formation involve PItds. Rapid transitory increases of PI(4,5)P2 are seen during particle binding and extension of the pseudopods that bind and engulf the endocytic target. PItds interact with Rho GTPases to form filamentous actin networks that provide structure to the pseudopods. Also in phagocytosis, PI(4,5)P2 influences receptor mobility, activation of integrins, membrane trafficking and ion channel activity, each at specific times and locations [44]. Roles for PI(3,4,5)P3 are suggested in pseudopod progression, phagosome sealing and actin breakdown, and for PI3P in phagosome maturation, including the targeting of internalized contents for degradation and the acquisition of bactericidal properties [44]. Intracellular pathogens can hijack PItd metabolism to facilitate their own cellular adhesion and entry [44, 45].
3.3. Phosphoinositides, Lysosomes and Autophagy
An important function of PItds in lysosomes involves changes related to nutrient conditions. PI3P and PI(3,5)P2 are involved in the regulation of lysosomal activity [2], influencing lysosome position, autophagic lysosome formation and nutrient signaling. Other PItds implicated include PI4P and PI(4,5)P2, and possibly PI5P [2, 46]. In nutrient‐rich conditions, insulin and other growth factors activate PI 3‐kinases class I, generating PI(3,4,5)P3, itself an activator of Akt. Hydrolysis of PI(3,4,5)P3 to PI(3,4)P2 by INPPL1 (SHIP2) further contributes to Akt activation [2]. Akt itself indirectly activates mTORC1, favoring anabolism. Similarly, after amino acid loading, activation of PIK3C3 synthesizes PI3P in the lysosomal membrane, providing anchoring sites for protrudin and FYCO1 and moving lysosomes towards the plasma membrane, where they fuse with cargo‐carrying vesicles [47]. Activation of mTORC1 in this context is maintained through the recruitment of phospholipase D1, which cleaves the PI head group and produces phosphatidic acid in the lysosomal membrane. The presence of phosphatidic acid causes dissociation of DEPTOR, an inhibitory subunit of mTORC1. Conversely, in nutrient‐deprived conditions, recruitment of PI3KC2β from the cytosol generates PI(3,4)P2, repressing mTORC activity and promoting perinuclear lysosomal clustering [43].
Autophagy is initiated by the autophagy‐related (ATG) proteins at sites of PI3P enrichment on the ER called omegasomes. Local PI3P production is achieved by PIK3C3, itself activated by the ULK1 complex, and possibly by PI3KC2α [2, 48]. PI3P promotes the recruitment of several proteins including DFCP1, WIPI1 and ATG16L1, allowing assembly of the phagophore. During stress (e.g., starvation, energy deficiency), PI5P can replace PI3P in recruiting similar proteins [48]. As the process advances, PI3P degradation is required, which occurs through interactions with MTMR proteins [2]. In order to achieve fusion with the lysosome, the presence of PI4P is required; its production is initiated by PI4K2α, trafficked from the Golgi with GABARAP proteins [48]. PI(3,5)P2 is also reported to enhance autophagosome–lysosome fusion and lysosomal acidification [48, 49].
3.4. Phosphoinositides and Cytoskeleton Remodeling
PItd action upon the cytoskeleton, particularly the actin framework that determines cell morphology, mobility, division and polarity, is a recurrent theme mentioned later in the brain, muscle, immune and renal sections. PI(4,5)P2, for example, participates in actin polymerization, frees G‐actin by permitting its dissociation from actin monomer‐profilin complexes, and enhances the function of adaptor proteins between the plasma membrane and the cytoskeleton, important for cell‐matrix and cell–cell adhesion [25]. PI(4,5)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 are critical players. Interactions between PI(4,5)P2 and proteins such as ezrin, moesin, radixin (ERM) and myosins contribute to cell shape maintenance by binding to the actin cytoskeleton [50]. In migrating cells, the accumulation of PI(4,5)P2 at the leading edge allows for microtubule capture and influences cytoskeleton regulators such as talin, Rho family small GTPases, IQGAP, gelsolin, and Src tyrosine kinase [28]. PI(3,4,5)P3 also functions at the leading edge of migrating cells, as in peripheral ruffles [25, 50]. Some evidence also suggests a role for PI4P in actin remodeling [37].
Cell division is influenced by PItd kinases and phosphatases. These processes include mitotic cell rounding, spindle orientation, cell elongation, cortical stability, symmetry of the furrow, furrow ingression, bridge stability, abscission and mid‐body remnant clearance [51]. The presence of PI(4,5)P2 allows for the recruitment of proteins binding to the cytoskeleton and force generator complexes, playing a role in spindle orientation, cell shape and bridge stability. Hydrolysis of PI(4,5)P2 and production of PI3P both have central roles in cytokinesis [51].
PItds play many roles in primary cilia. Different PItds are found at specific parts of the cilium; for example, PI(4,5)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 at the base and PI4P along the length of the cilium [35]. PI4P is present at the centrosome prior to ciliogenesis, and PI3P in the pericentriolar recycling endocytic compartments. PItd kinases and phosphatases INPP5B/E, OCRL, INPPL1 (SHIP2) and PTEN contribute to the stability and disassembly of cilia [35].
3.5. Phosphoinositides and Mitochondria
Both PI and PI(4,5)P2 are in mitochondrial inner and outer membranes, as well as several enzymes of PItd metabolism, including PI4K2α/β and synaptojanin 2 [24, 52, 53]. Disruption of mitoaggregates prior to mitophagy is partly driven by PI(4,5)P2, which promotes actin polymerization [54]. WIPI2, a PI3P effector, and valosin‐containing protein (VCP) were shown to be recruited to damaged mitochondria, allowing for ubiquitination and targeting to the proteasome [55]. As in lysosomes, PItds can drive mitochondrial fission in response to nutrition. Under fed conditions, PI3P on early endosomes promotes mitochondrial fission through its binding with RRBP1 and kinectin 1 [56]. The final stages of mitochondrial fission require PI4P, produced both by lysosomes and the Golgi, the transport of which to mitochondria is facilitated by mitochondria‐associated membranes [24]. Conversely, under nutrient‐poor conditions, dephosphorylation of PI3P by MTM1 represses fission [24].
3.6. Phosphoinositides in the Nucleus
In contrast to other organelles, in which PItds are membrane‐bound, as much as 40% of PItds in the nucleus are solubilized in nucleoplasmic speckles [28, 57]. In these structures, several proteins hide the PItd acyl chains within a hydrophobic core. This positions the phosphorylated head groups to the surface for intranuclear signaling [57]. PI(4,5)P2 negatively interacts with histone H1, decreasing chromatin condensation and increasing gene expression. PI(4,5)P2 can modulate factors that impact chromatin remodeling, messenger RNA export and processing and DNA repair [28, 58]. Also, PI5P has been shown to interact with PHD finger‐containing proteins, which are involved in reading, writing and erasing of the histone code [58].
4. Genetic Disorders of Phosphoinositide Metabolism
PItds play multiple roles in all cell types (Figures 2, 3, 4, 5). Their levels are controlled precisely in time and space by the action of over 50 phosphatases and kinases (Figure 1). As expected from this complexity, increasing numbers of genetic disorders of phosphoinositide metabolism (GDPIMs) are described, and they produce a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations. Known monogenic conditions associated with GDPIM are listed in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
Disorders of phosphoinositide metabolism.
| Gene | Protein name and function | Inh | IMD name | Clinical features | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIG4 | Phosphatidylinositol 3,5‐bisphosphate 5‐phosphatase | AR | Yunis‐Varón syndrome | Skeletal dysplasia with severe neurologic involvement. Skeletal findings: cleidocranial dysplasia with calvarial dysostosis, hypoplastic/absent clavicles, pelvic dysplasia with hip dislocations, digital abnormalities (often absent or hypoplastic 1st fingers and toes). Neurologically, developmental delay, swallowing difficulties, microcephaly (~50%) and CNS abnormalities (e.g., frontal lobe, cerebellum, basal ganglia) and possible cardiac involvement, including congenital heart defects. Dysmorphic features. Sparse hair. Note: Families with intermediate phenotypes between Yunis‐Varón syndrome and CMT4J (below) are known, some with leuko‐encephalopathy [59] and/or parkinsonism [60] | [59, 60, 61, 62] |
| FIG4 | Phosphatidylinositol 3,5‐bisphosphate 5‐phosphatase | AR | Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 4 J | Sensory and motor polyneuropathy with weakness, sensory deficits, areflexia and gait difficulties. Age of onset and severity is variable, from childhood to adulthood. Loss of ambulation in more severe cases. Some individuals reported with parkinsonism or phenotypes intermediary between CMT4J and Yunis‐Varón syndrome. | [63, 64, 65] |
| FIG4 | Phosphatidylinositol 3,5‐bisphosphate 5‐phosphatase | AR | Familial epilepsy with polymicrogyria | Described in a single family (6 affected individuals) with temporo‐occipital polymicrogyria, epilepsy and psychiatric manifestations (psychosis, aggressiveness). One patient also had neuropathy. | [66, 67] |
| FIG4 | Phosphatidylinositol 3,5‐bisphosphate 5‐phosphatase | AD | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 11 | Some variants in FIG4 have been found to be a risk factor with incomplete penetrance for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or primary lateral sclerosis, identified at low frequency in large cohorts of ALS. | [68, 69] |
| HYCC1 | Hyccin PI4KA lipid kinase complex subunit 1 (FAM126A) | AR | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy and congenital cataract | Progressive pyramidal and cerebellar involvement. Initially normal development progressing to severe spastic paraplegia; loss of walking in late childhood/adolescence. Diffuse hypomyelination on brain MRI. Cataracts, typically congenital but may appear later. Mild to moderate ID and cognitive dysfunction is frequent. Seizures in ~1/3. Polyneuropathy described later in course. | [70, 71, 72] |
| INPP5E | Inositol polyphosphate‐5‐phosphatase E | AR | Joubert syndrome (and related disorders) | First identified in a family with MORM syndrome (mental retardation, truncal obesity, retinal dystrophy and micropenis). Later associated with Joubert syndrome: ID, oculomotor apraxia, “molar tooth” sign on brain MRI. Ocular findings frequent (retinopathy, coloboma). Possible non‐syndromic retinal degeneration. | [73, 74, 75, 76] |
| INPP5K | Inositol polyphosphate‐5‐phosphatase K or skeletal muscle and kidney‐enriched inositol 5‐phosphatase (SKIP) | AR | Congenital muscular dystrophy with cataracts and intellectual disability | Described in a few families with muscle weakness, variable ID, short stature, often early‐onset cataracts. Spasticity, microcephaly and seizures reported in some affected individuals. | [77, 78, 79] |
| INPPL1 | Inositol polyphosphate phosphatase like 1 or SRC homology 2 domain‐containing inositol phosphatase 2 (SHIP2) | AR | Opsismodysplasia | Delayed bone maturation, micromelia with short hands and feet, platyspondyly, metaphyseal cupping, dysmorphic features (hypertelorism, high forehead, short nose, large fontanelle) with relative macrocephaly. Respiratory insufficiency and renal phosphate wasting are frequent. Some present mild motor delays. | [80, 81] |
| ITPR1 | Inositol‐1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptor type 1 | AD, AR | Gillespie syndrome | Neonatal non‐progressive cerebellar ataxia, aniridia, variable ID, progressive cerebellar atrophy on brain MRI. Described with de novo monoallelic variants in the IP3‐binding domain or biallelic truncating variants. | [82, 83, 84] |
| ITPR1 | Inositol‐1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptor type 1 | AD | Spinocerebellar ataxia type 15 (SCA15) | Adult‐onset slowly progressive cerebellar ataxia with cerebellar atrophy. Variants typically large deletions of ITPR1, often encompassing SUMF1. Recently, some missense variants have also been associated with SCA15. | [82, 85, 86] |
| ITPR1 | Inositol‐1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptor type 1 | AD | Spinocerebellar ataxia type 29 (SCA29) | Typically, infantile‐onset non‐progressive ataxia, developmental delay, variable cognitive impairment and cerebellar hypoplasia/atrophy. Ophthalmoplegia, ptosis and movement disorders (e.g., dystonia, chorea) are reported. | [87, 88, 89] |
| ITPR1 | Inositol‐1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptor type 1 | AD | Pontocerebellar hypoplasia with ataxia | Described in one individual with pontocerebellar hypoplasia, developmental delay and non‐progressive ataxia. Associated with de novo variant in transmembrane domain. | [82] |
| ITPR2 | Inositol‐1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptor type 2 | AR | Generalized isolated anhidrosis | Reported in one family with 5 affected members. Heat intolerance, anhidrosis, but normal numbers and morphology of sweat glands. | [90] |
| MTM1 | Myotubularin 1, Phosphatidylinositol 3‐phosphatase | XL | X‐linked centronuclear myopathy | Presents in newborn males. Profound, diffuse weakness, ptosis and ophthalmoparesis, respiratory failure and feeding difficulties. Most patients require ventilatory, feeding and ambulatory support. Extra‐muscular signs, e.g., learning difficulties, are reported. Most females are asymptomatic, but a few develop muscle involvement, from mild to neonatal severe. | [91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96] |
| MTMR2 | Myotubularin‐related protein 2, Phosphatidylinositol 3‐phosphatase | AR | Charcot–Marie‐Tooth (CMT) disease type 4B1 | Demyelinating neuropathy with upper and lower limb weakness and facial weakness (~60%), presentation infancy to late childhood. Vocal cord palsy and respiratory difficulties (~1/3). Pes planus is frequent. Nonsense variants associated with more severe disease than missense/C‐terminal truncating variants. | [97, 98, 99] |
| OCRL | Phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate 5‐phosphatase | XL | Oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe | Renal disease: initially low‐molecular weight proteinuria and albuminuria, evolving into Fanconi syndrome (most individuals have aminoaciduria, calcium/phosphate wasting, and more rarely potassium wasting and glycosuria). Nephrocalcinosis (~45%). Neonatal cataracts in nearly all, plus growth retardation, developmental delay and behavioral abnormalities. In adulthood, risk of arthropathy and end‐stage kidney disease. | [100, 101, 102] |
| OCRL | Phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate 5‐phosphatase | XL | Dent disease type 2 | Lowe syndrome‐like condition but milder. Low molecular weight proteinuria, hypercalciuria, growth retardation. Aminoaciduria, phosphate wasting and glycosuria are rare. Cataracts (~7%). Developmental delay (~1/4). Note: Atypical forms with digenic inheritance described (CLCN5 [103]; INPP5B [104]). | [101, 103, 104, 105, 106] |
| PI4KA | Phosphatidylinositol 4‐kinase α | AR | PI4KA‐related disorder | Disorder of variable severity with neurologic abnormalities: ID, epilepsy, spastic paraplegia & ataxia. Brain MRI: possible hypomyelination, white matter atrophy, thin/dysplastic corpus callosum, cerebellar hypoplasia/atrophy. Severely affected cases reported (polymicrogyria, arthrogryposis). Multiple intestinal atresias, inflammatory bowel disease, and immunodeficiency reported in patient subgroups. Milder presentations (spastic paraplegia, cervical cord atrophy, normal cognition) reported in a few. | [107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112] |
| PI4KB | Phosphatidylinositol 4‐kinase β | AD | PI4KB‐related deafness | Identified in one family and 5 other individuals with nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss and inner ear malformations, including cochlear dysplasia and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. | [113] |
| PI4K2A | Phosphatidylinositol 4‐kinase type 2 α | AR | PI4K‐associated neurodevelopmental disorder | Described in 5 individuals from 4 families with severe neurodevelopmental delay with structural CNS abnormalities (corpus callosum dysgenesis/hypoplasia, white matter volume loss, vermis hypoplasia), akathisia, epilepsy. Subtle dysmorphic features were reported, including a progeroid appearance with cutis laxa in one case [114] | [114, 115, 116] |
| PIK3C2A | Phosphatidylinositol‐4‐phosphate 3‐kinase catalytic subunit type 2 α | AR | Oculoskeletodental syndrome | Seven individuals (4 families) with short stature, coarse facial features, skeletal and dental abnormalities (including scoliosis), congenital cataracts, and developmental delay; some also presented strokes, hearing loss, nephrocalcinosis or proteinuria. Mild elevation of urine glycosaminoglycans has been reported. | [117, 118] |
| PIK3CA | Phosphatidylinositol‐4,5‐bisphosphate 3‐kinase catalytic subunit α | Som | PIK3CA‐related disorders |
Group of disorders with segmental overgrowth, vascular malformations and other lesions. Can cause neurologic (ventriculomegaly, seizures, developmental delay) and vascular (coagulopathy, thromboembolism) complications, infections, pain and functional impairment. Non‐specific genitourinary abnormalities reported. Refer to Box 2 for details. |
[119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125] |
| PIK3CD | Phosphatidylinositol‐4,5‐bisphosphate 3‐kinase catalytic subunit δ | AD | Activated PI3Kδ syndrome (APDS) 1 | Recurrent infections, most notably sinopulmonary (especially encapsulated organisms: H. influenzae , S. pneumoniae ), and viral infections (herpesviruses: EBV, CMV, VZV, HPV). Also: non‐neoplastic lymphoproliferation (lymphadenopathies, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly), autoimmune predisposition (hematologic, including immune thrombocytopenic purpura and autoimmune hemolytic anemia), risk of lymphoma. APDS1 presents more often with bronchiectasis, cytopenias and splenomegaly than PIK3R1‐related APDS2 (below). | [126, 127, 128, 129] |
| PIK3CD | Phosphatidylinositol‐4,5‐bisphosphate 3‐kinase catalytic subunit δ | AR | PI3Kδ deficiency syndrome | Few patients described. Severe humoral immunodeficiency, recurrent infections, autoimmune disorders (inflammatory bowel disease, thrombocytopenia, hepatitis, JIA). | [130, 131] |
| PIK3CG | Phosphatidylinositol‐4,5‐bisphosphate 3‐kinase catalytic subunit ɣ | AR | Immunodeficiency 97 with autoinflammation | Described in 2 unrelated people: immunodeficiency, autoimmunity, colitis, pneumonitis, cytopenias. Macrophage activation in one without fulfilling criteria for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. | [132, 133] |
| PIK3R1 | Phosphoinositide‐3‐kinase regulatory subunit 1 | AD | Activated PI3Kδ syndrome (APDS) 2 | As in PIK3CD‐related APDS1 (above), but higher risk of dysmorphic features, failure to thrive, developmental delay & lymphoma than APDS1. | [127, 128, 129, 134] |
| PIK3R1 | Phosphoinositide‐3‐kinase regulatory subunit 1 | AD | SHORT syndrome | SHORT (Short stature, Hyperextensibility of joints and/or inguinal hernia, Ocular depression, Rieger abnormality and Teething delay). Only ~50% have ≥ 4 features. Dysmorphia: progeroid appearance frequent, with partial lipodystrophy & insulin resistance, diabetes typically from late childhood/early adulthood. | [135, 136, 137] |
| PIK3R1 | Phosphoinositide‐3‐kinase regulatory subunit 1 | AR | Agammaglobulinemia | In 2 families with agammaglobulinemia and cytopenias (B‐cell lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia). Colitis in one individual. All variants have been in exon 7. | [138, 139] |
| PIK3R2 | Phosphoinositide‐3‐kinase regulatory subunit 2 | AD | PIK3R2‐associated megalencephaly and polymicrogyria | Severe megalencephaly, bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria (often slightly asymmetric), epilepsy and ID (mild ‐ moderate). Mosaicism possible, with milder signs (isolated megalencephaly; perisylvian polymicrogyria without megalencephaly). Frequent cause of polymicrogyria in one cohort [140]. | [140, 141, 142] |
| PIK3R5 | Phosphoinositide‐3‐kinase regulatory subunit 5 | AR | Ataxia with oculomotor apraxia 3 | Four individuals from one family: ataxia, cerebellar atrophy, dysarthria, axonal sensory polyneuropathy and oculomotor apraxia presenting between ages 12–18. | [143] |
| PIKFYVE | Phosphatidylinositol‐3‐phosphate 5‐kinase, type III | AD | Fleck corneal dystrophy | Corneal stroma with small white flecks/hyperreflective dots, due to dilated keratocytes with intracytoplasmic vesicles with complex lipids/glycosaminoglycans. | [144, 145] |
| PIKFYVE | Phosphatidylinositol‐3‐phosphate 5‐kinase, type III | AD | Congenital cataracts | Described in one extended family and one other individual with non‐syndromic congenital cataracts. | [146, 147] |
| PIP5K1C | Phosphatidylinositol‐4‐phosphate 5‐kinase type 1 ɣ | AR | Lethal congenital contractural syndrome 3 | Seven affected infants from 2 families. Severe joint contractures, muscle wasting (especially in lower limbs). Neonatal death from respiratory insufficiency. | [148, 149] |
| PIP5K1C | Phosphatidylinositol‐4‐phosphate 5‐kinase type 1 ɣ | AD | PIP5K1C‐gain of function neurodevelopmental disorder | Moderate to severe ID (most cannot walk; non‐verbal), epilepsy, acquired microcephaly, visual abnormalities (strabismus, cerebral visual impairment, optic atrophy). On MRI: abnormalities of the lateral ventricles and white matter. Skeletal abnormalities: craniosynostosis, talipes equinovarus and scoliosis. Gain‐of‐function dominant de novo variants in PIP5K1C. | [150] |
| PLCB1 | Phospholipase C β1 | AR | Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 12 | Epileptic encephalopathy reported in a few families, presenting with seizures in infancy (spasms, focal seizures, febrile status epilepticus) and developmental delay with regression or stagnation. Swallowing difficulties are reported. | [151, 152] |
| PLCB3 | Phospholipase C β3 | AR | Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia with corneal dystrophy | Two individuals from one family: spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, short limbs, narrow thorax, abnormal iliac bones, vertebral beaking. Other manifestations include dysmorphia, corneal opacities, developmental delay, and chronic lung disease requiring oxygen supplementation. | [153] |
| PLCB4 | Phospholipase C β4 | AD, AR | Auriculocondylar syndrome 2 | Predicted monoallelic dominant‐negative variants (type 2A) or, more rarely, biallelic variants (type 2B) in PLCB4. Variable mandibular and condylar hypoplasia/dysplasia and temporomandibular joint abnormalities, “question mark” ears and microstomia, prominent cheeks. In some: sleep apnea, feeding and speech difficulties and developmental delay. | [154, 155, 156] |
| PLCD1 | Phospholipase C δ1 | AD, AR | Hereditary leukonychia | i.e., partial to complete whitening of the nails, with koilonychia in a few families. | [157, 158] |
| PLCD1 | Phospholipase C δ1 | AD | Hereditary trichilemmal cysts or pilomatricomas | Benign tumors of the hair follicles, as trichilemmal cysts [159] or pilomatricomas [160]. | [159, 160] |
| PLCE1 | Phospholipase C ε1 | AR | Steroid‐resistant nephrotic syndrome | Nephrotic syndrome. Average onset ~4 years. Progression to kidney failure. In most cases, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or diffuse mesangial sclerosis. | [161, 162] |
| PLCG2 | Phospholipase C ɣ2 | AD | PLCG2‐associated antibody deficiency and immune dysregulation (PLAID) | Broad spectrum including recurrent sinopulmonary infections, humoral immune deficiency, atopy and autoinflammation. Often classified clinically as PLAID (with large in‐frame deletions) or APLAID (autoinflammatory PLAID, with gain‐of function variants). Cold‐induced urticaria typically seen in PLAID phenotype. Haploinsufficiency is associated with predisposition to herpesvirus and NK defects, whereas gain‐of‐function is associated with granulomas. | [163, 164] |
| PLCH1 | Phospholipase C η1 | AR | PLCH1‐associated holoprosencephaly | In 2 families (4 affected children). Holoprosencephaly, some with congenital heart defects. Associated with nonsense variants in PLCH1. | [165] |
| PTEN | Phosphatase and tensin homolog; phosphatidylinositol‐3,4,5‐trisphosphate 3‐phosphatase | AD | PTEN‐hamartoma tumor syndrome | Tumor predisposition syndrome with a highly variable presentation, even intrafamilial. Mosaic forms are frequent (10%–40% of de novo PTEN variants). Patients with disseminated mosaicism may be clinically indistinguishable from those with dominantly‐inherited forms. Refer to Box 3 for details. | [166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173] |
| SBF1 | SET‐binding factor 1 or Myotubularin‐related protein 5 (MTMR5), a PI 3‐phosphatase MTMR2 binding protein | AR | Charcot–Marie‐Tooth (CMT) disease type 4B3 | Reported in some families with axonal motor polyneuropathy with cranial nerve involvement, microcephaly, ID. Brain MRI may show a “fork and bracket” sign (T2 hyperintensity in pons and mesencephalon from cranial nerve VI and VII degeneration). Also, isolated demyelinating sensory‐motor neuropathy in 3 patients [174]. | [99, 174, 175] |
| SBF2 | SET binding factor 2 or Myotubularin‐related protein 13 (MTMR13), a PI 3‐phosphatase MTMR2 binding protein | AR | Charcot–Marie‐Tooth (CMT) disease type 4B2 | Demyelinating neuropathy, limb weakness, foot deformities, vocal cord palsy (~40%), onset from infancy to early adulthood. Facial weakness is less frequent than in CMT4B1; glaucoma in ~1/3. | [99, 176, 177] |
| SYNJ1 | Synaptojanin 1, polyphosphoinositide phosphatase | AR | Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 53 | Severe progressive neurologic disorder, refractory seizures (often neonatal), severe developmental delay/ID, spastic tetraplegia, often need tube feeding; cortical blindness in some. | [178, 179, 180] |
| SYNJ1 | Synaptojanin 1, polyphosphoinositide phosphatase | AR | Early‐onset Parkinson disease 20 | Movement disorder: parkinsonism, dystonia, dysarthria, dysphagia, postural instability. In some, supranuclear vertical gaze palsy or cognitive impairment. Onset mostly third decade, but some earlier. Seizures are frequent, often appearing before movement disorder. Variable response to levodopa. | [180, 181] |
| VAC14 | VAC14. In multiprotein complex with PIKFYVE and FIG4. | AR | Yunis‐Varón‐like syndrome | Described in a single child with Yunis‐Varón syndrome‐like phenotype: dysmorphic features, sparse hair, skeletal dysplasia (handlebar clavicles, flared iliac wings, acetabular dysplasia, intervertebral disc calcifications, multiple bone hypoplasias in hand/feet including 1st fingers/toes), osteopenia with multiple fractures, progressive neurologic signs (basal ganglia cysts, leukodystrophy, axonal polyneuropathy, hydrocephalus). | [182] |
| VAC14 | VAC14. In multiprotein complex with PIKFYVE and FIG4. | AR | Childhood‐onset striatonigral degeneration | Progressive complex neurologic disorder with dystonia, dysarthria, gait abnormalities, hypersalivation, hearing loss and ataxia in some. Brain MRI may show hyperintensity of the striatum and iron deposition in the substantia nigra and pallidum. | [183, 184] |
Abbreviations: AD, autosomal dominant; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; APDS, activated PI3Kδ syndrome; AR, autosomal recessive; ID, intellectual disability; Inh, inheritance pattern; JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis; Ref, references; SCA, spinocerebellar ataxia; Som, somatic variants; XL, X‐linked.
4.1. Neurologic Manifestations
Most GDPIMs have some neurological involvement, which may reflect the many roles of PItds in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Neurotransmission is partly regulated by PItds. For example, PI3P enhances the clustering of GABA receptors on post‐synaptic membranes, low PI(3,5)P2 levels increase the internalization of NMDA‐mediated calcium channels and PI(3,4,5)P3 helps to maintain AMPA‐type glutamate receptors at the synaptic membrane [185, 186]. PI(4,5)P2 regulates synaptic neurotransmitter release similar to its role in exocytosis [28, 40]; PItds also participate in the recycling of synaptic vesicle membranes [21]. Certain neurotransmitters activate PLC pathways, notably in the regulation of endocannabinoid neuronal excitability [186]. Cortical development is influenced by PItds, notably by actin cytoskeleton remodeling, for example, PI(3,4)P2 in neurite initiation, PI(3,4,5)P3 in growth cones of developing neurites, and both PI(3,4)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 in dendrite morphogenesis [185, 186].
Developmental delay or intellectual disability occurs in numerous GDPIMs. For example, intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorders are observed in some PTEN‐hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) patients [166, 167] and developmental regression is described in PLCB‐related encephalopathy [151, 152]. Other signs in addition to developmental abnormalities occur in nearly all of these disorders.
Epilepsy occurs in several PItd‐related disorders, including variants in PLCB1 [151, 152] and SYNJ1 [178, 179], and with PIP5K1C gain of function [150]. Cortical malformations may relate to the seizures in PIK3R2‐associated megalencephaly and polymicrogyria syndrome [141, 142], with biallelic PI4KA [107, 108, 109] or PI4K2A [115, 116] variants, and PIK3CA‐related disorders [119, 120].
White matter abnormalities are also described in GDPIMs, including leukodystrophy in PI4KA‐related disorders [108, 109, 110] and periventricular white matter lesions in oculoskeletodental syndrome, which may relate to the role of PIK3C2A in angiogenesis and vascular response [117].
Movement disorders occur in several PItd‐related conditions. Ataxia is prevalent with ITPR1 variants, with onsets in newborns (e.g., Gillespie syndrome, with aniridia and intellectual disability), children (spinocerebellar ataxia type 29) or adults (spinocerebellar ataxia type 15) [82]. Biallelic PIK3R5 variants are associated with ataxia with oculomotor apraxia [143]; perhaps related to high PIK3R5 expression in the fetal cerebellum [31]. A fraction of Joubert syndrome, a ciliopathy with abnormalities of the vermis, is caused by variants in INPP5E, which affects cilial biology (see section 3.4) [73, 74]. Dystonia, dysarthria and parkinsonism occur in early‐onset Parkinson disease associated with SYNJ1 variants [180, 181] and childhood‐onset striatonigral degeneration, with biallelic VAC14 variants [183, 184].
Four forms of Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) neuropathy are described in GDPIMs, linked to different genes: MTMR2 (CMT4B1) [97, 98], SBF2 (CMT4B2) [176, 177], SBF1 (CMT4B3) [174] and FIG4 (CMT4J) [63]. These can present from infancy through adulthood, with CMT4B1 tending to present earlier (average 2.8 years, range 0–13) than CMT4B2 (average 6.7 years, range 1–20) [99]. Facial weakness and vocal cord paralysis can occur, particularly in CMT4B1 [99]. MTMR2, SBF2 and FIG4 are involved in PI(3,5)P2 metabolism, suggesting an importance for this PItd in peripheral nerves [31].
4.2. Muscular Manifestations
Some disorders of PItd metabolism primarily show muscle involvement. The most frequent of these is X‐linked centronuclear myopathy, caused by variants in myotubularin 1 (MTM1), a PI 3‐phosphatase [91, 92, 93]. Affected males typically present with severe neonatal muscle weakness requiring ventilatory and feeding support. Mortality is estimated at 10% per year, mostly from respiratory failure. Among survivors, about half can maintain a sitting position and about 13% achieve standing or walking [94]. Most heterozygous females are asymptomatic, but some have mild myopathy or even neonatal presentations as severe as those of their male counterparts [95]. Deficiency of MTM1 increases dynamin 2 (DMN2) [96], which participates in clathrin‐mediated endocytosis and interacts with the actin cytoskeleton. Primary variants in DMN2 are themselves associated with centronuclear myopathy [187].
Two very rare GDPIMs with muscular manifestations include congenital muscular dystrophy with cataracts and intellectual disability (biallelic INPP5K variants [77]) and lethal congenital contractural syndrome 3 (biallelic PIP5K1C variants [148]).
4.3. Skeletal Manifestations
Some GDPIMs have overt skeletal dysplasia. Yunis‐Varón syndrome is a skeletal dysplasia with severe neurologic involvement, caused by variants in FIG4, encoding a PI 5‐phosphatase that can convert PI(3,5)P2 into PI3P [61]. This condition presents with cleidocranial dysplasia (wide fontanelles, absent or hypoplastic clavicles), absent or hypoplastic thumbs and first toes, pelvic dysplasia, absent sternal ossification centers and fractures. FIG4 complexes with the kinase PIKfyve and the scaffolding protein VAC14; interestingly, in one Yunis‐Varón patient with normal FIG4 analysis, variants in VAC14 were found [182]. The complex localizes to the endosomal and lysosomal compartments, and large vacuoles compatible with enlarged lysosomes are identified by histopathology; vacuolization occurs in primary osteoblasts cultured from Fig4‐deficient mice. Together, these data suggest involvement of FIG4 in membranous and endochondral ossification, as well as skeletal maintenance [61].
Another skeletal dysplasia, opsismodysplasia, is associated with biallelic variants in INPPL1, also known as SHIP2, which encodes a PI(3,4,5)P3 5‐phosphatase. Patients have micromelia, and radiographs show delayed ossification, platyspondyly, metaphyseal cupping and squared metacarpals [80, 81]. Interaction of INPPL1 with Akt signaling as well as potential roles in cell polarity and FGF signaling is proposed to underlie the skeletal manifestations of this disorder [188]. INPPL1 is ubiquitous but enriched in mesenchymal precursors of chondrocytes and osteoblasts [31].
Skeletal abnormalities also occur in oculoskeletodental syndrome (caused by PIK3C2A variants) [118], spondylometaphyseal dysplasia with corneal dystrophy (PLCB3) [153], and auriculocondylar syndrome 2 (PLCB4) [154]. The last two suggest a role for phospholipase C activity in bone. Skeletal manifestations also occur in overgrowth syndromes discussed in section 4.5.
4.4. Immunologic Manifestations
PItds are deeply implicated in innate and adaptive immunity, regulating phagocytosis (section 3.2.2), autophagy (section 3.3) and actin remodeling (section 3.4) which determines cell movement [44]. PItds regulate neutrophil survival [189], and in B cells, they mediate development, survival and activation by antigens [19]. Recently, biallelic PI4KA variants have been shown to disrupt B cell metabolism, inducing mitochondrial dysfunction as well as deranged cytoskeleton organization [190]. PI 3‐kinases are important, regulating chemoattraction [191]; neutrophil/macrophage activation [19]; receptor‐driven granule secretion [19]; pro‐inflammatory cytokine production [192]; T cell development, differentiation, proliferation and survival [19]. Conversely, PItd metabolism can be hijacked by intracellular bacteria [44]: increased PI(3,4,5)P3 and low PI(4,5)P2 remodel actin, promoting bacterial entry by micropinocytosis [45], and bacterial suppression of PI3P production reduces lysosomal fusion and bacterial destruction [45].
Some GDPIMs have primarily immune phenotypes. Activated PI3Kδ syndromes 1 and 2 (APSD1/2) are caused by monoallelic variants in PIK3CD [126] and PIK3R1 [134], respectively. PIK3CD encodes the catalytic subunit of PI3Kδ, and PIK3R1, the regulatory subunit of PI3Kδ. Both APSDs are characterized by recurrent sinopulmonary and viral infections (particularly herpesviruses) and autoimmune disorders (most often hematologic), lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly. However, APDS1 typically presents with bronchiectasis, cytopenia and splenomegaly, whereas APDS2 has higher risks of lymphoma, developmental delay, failure to thrive and dysmorphism [127]. PIK3CD, PIK3CG and PIK3R1 are associated with other recessive immune phenotypes: biallelic variants in PIK3CD have been associated with PI3Kδ deficiency syndrome (immunodeficiency, autoimmune disorder predisposition) in a few individuals [130, 131]; PIK3CG deficiency was described in two individuals with immune deficiency and autoimmunity [132, 133]; and biallelic PIK3R1 variants have been found in two families with agammaglobulinemia and cytopenia [138, 139].
PLCG2‐associated antibody deficiency and immune dysregulation (PLAID) presents with cold urticaria, humoral immune deficiency and autoimmunity. A related phenotype, APLAID (i.e., autoinflammation plus PLAID), reportedly has prominent interstitial lung disease, enterocolitis and autoinflammation, but without cold urticaria. PLAID was first described with large in‐frame deletions encompassing the autoinhibitory domain of PLCɣ2, with signaling defects at normal temperature but activated signaling in the cold, APLAID was associated with gain‐of‐function variants [163, 164]. Recent research reveals other mechanisms, including hypermorphic, gain‐of‐function, dominant negative variants and haploinsufficiency [164].
Outside of the neurologic manifestations discussed earlier, autosomal recessive PI4KA‐related disorder is associated with combined immunodeficiency, inflammatory bowel disease and, in severe cases, with multiple intestinal atresias [108, 109, 110, 111].
4.5. Overgrowth & Tumors
PItds have many links to tumorigenesis. PI(3,4,5)P3 has been termed an “oncogenic” PItd, since its increase in tumors promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis [31]. Increases in PI(3,4,5)P3, notably from gain‐of‐function variants in the PI 3‐kinase PIK3CA, or from loss‐of‐function variants in the PI 3‐phosphatase PTEN, have been reported in numerous solid tumors [193, 194]. Many cancers have altered PI 3‐kinase function, and PI3K increases protein synthesis and cell cycle progression in response to growth signaling [195], notably via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, which enhances cell survival, cell motility, cell cycle progression, genomic stability, angiogenesis and inflammatory response [31]. PI 4‐kinases have been shown to have a tumor suppressor role, and PI 5‐phosphatases can function either as tumor suppressors or enhancers in different cancers [20, 58]. Dysregulation of PI 4‐kinases has been linked with abnormal levels of reactive oxygen species, p53 stress signaling, and conditions promoting metastasis such as decreased E‐cadherin expression [58]. Roles of PItds in histone code reading may also play a role in the expression of tumor suppressor genes [58]. GOLPH3, a PI4P effector, has roles in the Golgi DNA damage response, cell migration and growth factor signaling, all of which enable carcinogenesis [34].
Whereas cancer is defined as an “uncontrolled proliferation of transformed cells subject to evolution by natural selection” [196], overgrowth is more loosely defined as the presence of a generalized or localized excessive growth as compared to age‐matched controls or other body areas [197, 198]. Cancer predisposition and segmental overgrowth are described in two well‐characterized disorders of PItd metabolism related respectively to PIK3CA and to PTEN (see Boxes 2 and 3 for diagnostic criteria). Of note, alpelisib, a PI3K inhibitor, recently approved for the treatment of PIK3CA‐related overgrowth syndrome (PROS), has produced reduction of hemihypertrophy and vascular tumors, and improvement of congestive heart failure and scoliosis [199, 200].
BOX 2. PIK3CA‐related disorders.
Introduction: This group of conditions is caused by somatic variants in the PI kinase, PIK3CA, associated with segmental overgrowth, vascular malformations, and cutaneous abnormalities. Several disorders with a wide array of clinical presentations have been described, depending on tissue mosaicism. As such, molecular confirmation of the diagnosis most often relies on sequencing of a biopsy of an affected tissue. Diagnoses associated with PIK3CA variants include PIK3CA‐related overgrowth spectrum (PROS), PIK3CA‐related vascular malformations, and PIK3CA‐related nonvascular lesions [119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125].
PIK3CA‐related overgrowth spectrum (PROS): Different diagnostic entities have been grouped under the name PROS, including:
Macrodactyly: overgrowth limited to one or several fingers or toes
Facial/fibroadipose infiltrating lipomatosis
Lipomatosis of nerve
Muscular hemihypertrophy
Klippel‐Trénaunay syndrome: cutaneous vascular malformation, limb overgrowth, typically isolated to a lower extremity with extension to the lower trunk
Fibroadipose overgrowth (FAO)/hemihyperplasia with multiple lipomatosis (HHML)
Fibroadipose vascular anomaly
CLOVES syndrome: Congenital Lipomatous Overgrowth, Vascular malformations, Epidermal nevi and Scoliosis/Skeletal and Spinal anomalies
CLAPO: Capillary malformation of the lower lip, Lymphatic malformation of the face and neck, Asymmetry, and Partial/generalized Overgrowth
Megalencephaly—Capillary malformation—Polymicrogyria syndrome (MCAP)
Dysplastic megalencephaly/hemimegalencephaly
Diffuse capillary malformation with overgrowth
Diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic criteria are summarized below. For greater detail, readers should consult the original publication (Keppler‐Noreuil et al.) [119]:
Presence of somatic PIK3CA variant
Onset before early childhood
Overgrowth sporadic and mosaic (patchy, irregular)
- Either (1) or (2)
- Two or more of, typically progressive features:
- Overgrowth (adipose, muscle, nerve, skeletal)
- Vascular malformation (capillary, venous, arteriovenous, lymphatic)
- Epidermal nevus
- One of:
- Large isolated lymphatic malformation
- Isolated macrodactyly
- Overgrown splayed feet/hands
- Overgrown limbs
- Truncal adipose overgrowth
- Hemimegalencephaly
- Dysplastic megalencephaly
- Focal cortical dysplasia
- Epidermal nevus
- Seborrheic keratoses
- Benign lichenoid keratoses
BOX 3. PTEN‐hamartoma tumor syndrome.
Introduction: Conditions related to PTEN, a PItd phosphatase, include PTEN‐hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS), which groups multiple diagnostic entities with autosomal dominant transmission, including Cowden syndrome [168], Bannayan‐Riley‐Ruvalcaba syndrome [169], Lhermitte‐Duclos disease (cerebellar dysplasia and gangliocytoma of the cerebellum) [170], Proteus‐like syndrome [171], and macrocephaly—intellectual disability—autism syndrome [172].
Diagnostic features: The features are summarized as follows. For the classification of individual patients, readers are advised to consult the complete revised diagnostic criteria for PHTS (Pilarski et al. [166]):
In an individual:
-
1.
≥ 3 major criteria of which at least 1 must be macrocephaly, Lhermitte‐Duclos or GI hamartomas
-
2.
≥ 2 major criteria and ≥ 3 minor criteria
In a member of a family in which another individual meets the revised criteria or has a PTEN variant:
-
1.
≥ 2 major criteria
-
2.
1 major criterion and 2 minor criteria
-
3.
≥ 3 minor criteria
Major criteria
Breast cancer
Endometrial cancer (epithelial)
Thyroid cancer (follicular)
≥ 3 gastrointestinal hamartomas (including ganglioneuromas, excluding hyperplastic polyps)
Lhermitte‐Duclos disease (adult)
Macrocephaly (≥ 97th percentile, ♀ ≥ 58 cm, ♂ ≥ 60 cm)
Macular pigmentation of the glans penis
Multiple mucocutaneous lesions (≥ 3 trichilemmomas with ≥ 1 biopsy proven OR ≥ 3 palmoplantar keratotic pits and/or acral hyperkeratotic papules OR ≥ 3 mucocutaneous neuromas) OR oral papillomas (≥ 3 OR biopsy proven OR diagnosed by dermatologist)
Minor criteria
Autism spectrum disorder
Colon cancer
≥ 3 esophageal glycogenic acanthosis
≥ 3 lipomas
Intellectual disability
Renal cell carcinoma
Testicular lipomatosis
Thyroid cancer (papillary, follicular variant of papillary)
Thyroid structural lesions (adenoma, multinodular goiter)
Vascular anomalies (including multiple intracranial developmental venous anomalies)
4.6. Renal Manifestations
PItds affect renal filtration, reabsorption and cell polarization. Cell polarization, with the formation of distinct apical and basolateral membranes, depends partly on the synthesis of PI(4,5)P2 from PI(3,4,5)P3 at the apical membrane, recruiting annexin 2 and allowing for actin polymerization, whereas the basolateral membrane remains rich in PI(3,4,5)P3 [10]. Evidence suggests that PItds also participate in podocyte physiology, notably in the formation of the podocyte slit diaphragm, dependent on the actin cytoskeleton. PItd‐dependent clathrin‐mediated endocytosis (section 3.2.2) is important for endocytotic resorption of proteins in the tubule [10].
The oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe, caused by variants in the X‐linked OCRL gene, causes a multisystemic phenotype including neonatal cataracts, developmental delay, growth retardation, and chronic kidney disease [100, 101, 102]. Renal dysfunction in Lowe syndrome is characterized by low‐molecular weight proteinuria that further evolves into a partial to complete Fanconi syndrome, with aminoaciduria and calcium and phosphate wasting in most patients and glycosuria and/or potassium wasting in a smaller fraction [101, 102]. OCRL is an important regulator of clathrin‐mediated endocytosis in the kidney; OCRL deficiency causes accumulation of PI(4,5)P2 in endosomal membranes, actin accumulation, abnormal trafficking, mis‐sorting of membrane receptors such as megalin, mannose‐6‐phosphate receptors and epidermal growth factor receptor [10, 51] and abnormal autophagy [10].
Childhood onset steroid‐resistant nephrotic syndrome with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and diffuse mesangial sclerosis can result from biallelic variants in PLCE1, encoding phospholipase Cε1 [161, 162].
4.7. Ophthalmologic Manifestations
PItds function in phototransduction and cone photoreceptor survival [201], but retinal changes are infrequent in GDPIMs. A major exception is INPP5E‐related Joubert syndrome with retinal dystrophy [73, 74]. Cataracts occur in Lowe syndrome (OCRL) [101, 102], oculoskeletodental syndrome (PIK3C2A) [117, 118], congenital muscular dystrophy with cataracts and intellectual disability (INPP5K) [77], and in a form of dominantly inherited congenital cataracts (PIKFYVE) [146, 147]. Variants in PIKFYVE are associated with Fleck corneal dystrophy, characterized by hyperreflective white flecks in the corneal stroma, due to vesicles containing lipids and glycosaminoglycans [144, 145]. Corneal opacities are also observed with the spondylometaphyseal dysplasia caused by biallelic variants in PLCB3 [153]. Other various eye features reported in GDPIMs include Rieger anomaly in SHORT syndrome (PIK3R1) [135, 136, 137], optic atrophy, strabismus and cerebral visual impairment in PIP5K1C gain‐of‐function [150], and aniridia in Gillespie syndrome [82].
4.8. Cutaneous Manifestations
Typically, dermatologic signs occur in GDPIMs as one aspect of a multisystemic syndrome. Vascular or lymphatic malformations and overgrowth occur with variants in PIK3CA and PTEN (Boxes 2 and 3). Somatic PIK3CA variants can cause lichenoid and seborrheic keratoses and epidermal nevi [119]. PTEN‐related dermatological signs are hyperkeratosis, lipomas, mucocutaneous neuromas and macular pigmentation of the glans penis [166]. Cold‐induced urticaria is a useful diagnostic feature of PLCG2‐associated PLAID syndrome [163]. Syndromic cutis laxa occurred in one patient with PI4K2A variants [114].
Isolated skin findings occur with PLCD1 variants [157, 158] and include leukonychia (white finger‐ and toenails), koilonychia (nail shape showing central depression and lateral elevation) and benign tumors of hair follicles (trichilemmal cysts [159], pilomatricomas [160]). Autosomal recessive isolated anhidrosis with histologically normal sweat glands has been associated with ITPR2 variants [90].
5. Conclusion
Inborn errors of phosphoinositide metabolism (GDPIMs) are a challenging and expanding sector of biochemical genetics (Table 2). Most affect multiple organs but lack signs that are familiar signals for metabolic specialists, such as systemic decompensations. Their unique clinical spectra derive from the basic properties of PItd metabolism: PItds comprise a small fraction of total membrane lipids but changes in their levels, which can occur rapidly at highly focused points within cells, can trigger profound changes in cell biology and structure that manifest clinically.
GDPIMs raise many clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Clinically, most have neurologic involvement of diverse types (developmental delay, cortical dysplasia, cerebellar anomalies, white matter abnormalities, movement disorders and/or neuropathy). Muscular, immunologic, ophthalmologic, renal, skeletal, dermatologic phenotypes, plus tumor predisposition and growth abnormalities, are observed repeatedly among the known GDPIMs. The clinical features of patients with a given GDPIM often show a broad spectrum. At the time that patients present, specific GDPIMs can sometimes be suspected if several clinical signs correspond to those of a known GDPIM syndrome (Table 2). Conversely, GDPIMs cannot be eliminated strictly on clinical grounds, especially because of the broad clinical spectra of known GDPIMs and the fact that the clinical phenotypes related to many steps in PItd biology are as yet unknown. Better description of clinical spectra and natural history is clearly a priority; new syndromic associations will likely emerge and will help to standardize diagnosis and treatment, as illustrated by PIK3CA and PTEN.
Most laboratory diagnoses of GDPIMs come from broad‐based molecular testing. At the time of writing, no clinically established biochemical test provides reliable diagnosis for groups of GDPIMs. Such a test would be particularly important for patients with molecular variants of undetermined significance. A major challenge is that PItd levels in intracellular membranes have little or no effect upon known circulating or excreted metabolites, suggesting that biochemical diagnoses may require a cell‐based system. The quantitation of total cell PItd is possible (e.g., HPLC, mass spectrometry), but it is challenging to apply this to specific intracellular membranes [6, 202]. Microscopy‐based methods allow dynamic studies of PItd localization but have their own challenges, including the non‐specificity of probes that may detect multiple PItds [6, 202]. The redundancy among the enzymes of the PItd network adds to the challenge of developing reliable specific clinical biochemical diagnoses [6, 202].
Most GDPIMs have no specific treatment. This observation provides one of the strongest rationales for the study of GDPIMs as a group, since in the interconnected PItd network, modification of one component might alter the levels of others. Increasing knowledge of the properties of this network will be useful for research into all GDPIMs. The recent success of the PI 3‐kinase inhibitor alpelisib for the treatment of PIK3CA‐related overgrowth provides a glimmer of hope for other inborn errors of PItd metabolism.
Author Contributions
Francis Rossignol: Concept and design, drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. Foudil Lamari: Concept and design, critical revision of the manuscript. Grant A. Mitchell: Concept and design, critical revision of the manuscript.
Ethics Statement
All authors complied with the ethical guidelines according to the requirements of the JIMD.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
Dedicated to Jean‐Marie Saudubray for his inspiring vision, support and teaching in the field of human metabolic medicine. Figures were created with BioRender.com. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health.
Communicating Editor: Carlos R. Ferreira
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Contributor Information
Francis Rossignol, Email: francis.rossignol@nih.gov.
Grant A. Mitchell, Email: grant.mitchell.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.
References
- 1. Botero S., Chiaroni‐Clarke R., and Simon S. M., “ Escherichia coli as a Platform for the Study of Phosphoinositide Biology,” Science Advances 5, no. 3 (2019): eaat4872, 10.1126/sciadv.aat4872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Posor Y., Jang W., and Haucke V., “Phosphoinositides as Membrane Organizers,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 23, no. 12 (2022): 797–816, 10.1038/s41580-022-00490-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Blunsom N. J. and Cockcroft S., “Phosphatidylinositol Synthesis at the Endoplasmic Reticulum,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta ‐ Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1865, no. 1 (2020): 158471, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2019.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Balla T., “Phosphoinositides: Tiny Lipids With Giant Impact on Cell Regulation,” Physiological Reviews 93, no. 3 (2013): 1019–1137, 10.1152/physrev.00028.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Grabon A., Bankaitis V. A., and McDermott M. I., “The Interface Between Phosphatidylinositol Transfer Protein Function and Phosphoinositide Signaling in Higher Eukaryotes,” Journal of Lipid Research 60, no. 2 (2019): 242–268, 10.1194/jlr.R089730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hammond G. R. and Balla T., “Polyphosphoinositide Binding Domains: Key to Inositol Lipid Biology,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 746–758, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Dinicola S., Unfer V., Facchinetti F., et al., “Inositols: From Established Knowledge to Novel Approaches,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 19 (2021): 10575, 10.3390/ijms221910575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Agranoff B. W., “Turtles All the Way: Reflections on Myo‐Inositol,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 284, no. 32 (2009): 21121–21126, 10.1074/jbc.X109.004747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wu T., Yin F., Guang S., He F., Yang L., and Peng J., “The Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Biosynthesis Pathway in Human Diseases,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 15, no. 1 (2020): 129, 10.1186/s13023-020-01401-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Staiano L. and De Matteis M. A., “Phosphoinositides in the Kidney,” Journal of Lipid Research 60, no. 2 (2019): 287–298, 10.1194/jlr.R089946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. De Matteis A. and De Camilli P., “Preface,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 697, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sasaki T., Takasuga S., Sasaki J., et al., “Mammalian Phosphoinositide Kinases and Phosphatases,” Progress in Lipid Research 48, no. 6 (2009): 307–343, 10.1016/j.plipres.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Reactome , “PI Metabolism,” accessed July 20, 2024, https://reactome.org/PathwayBrowser/#/R‐HSA‐1483255.
- 14. Vance J. E., “Phospholipid Synthesis and Transport in Mammalian Cells,” Traffic 16, no. 1 (2015): 1–18, 10.1111/tra.12230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Traynor‐Kaplan A., Kruse M., Dickson E. J., et al., “Fatty‐Acyl Chain Profiles of Cellular Phosphoinositides,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta ‐ Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1862, no. 5 (2017): 513–522, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Dickson E. J. and Hille B., “Understanding Phosphoinositides: Rare, Dynamic, and Essential Membrane Phospholipids,” Biochemical Journal 476, no. 1 (2019): 1–23, 10.1042/BCJ20180022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jin N., Lang M. J., and Weisman L. S., “Phosphatidylinositol 3,5‐Bisphosphate: Regulation of Cellular Events in Space and Time,” Biochemical Society Transactions 44, no. 1 (2016): 177–184, 10.1042/BST20150174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Pemberton J. G., Kim Y. J., Humpolickova J., et al., “Defining the Subcellular Distribution and Metabolic Channeling of Phosphatidylinositol,” Journal of Cell Biology 219, no. 3 (2020): e201906130, 10.1083/jcb.201906130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hawkins P. T. and Stephens L. R., “PI3K Signalling in Inflammation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 882–897, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ramos A. R., Ghosh S., and Erneux C., “The Impact of Phosphoinositide 5‐Phosphatases on Phosphoinositides in Cell Function and Human Disease,” Journal of Lipid Research 60, no. 2 (2019): 276–286, 10.1194/jlr.R087908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Posor Y., Eichhorn‐Grunig M., and Haucke V., “Phosphoinositides in Endocytosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 794–804, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Volpatti J. R., Al‐Maawali A., Smith L., Al‐Hashim A., Brill J. A., and Dowling J. J., “The Expanding Spectrum of Neurological Disorders of Phosphoinositide Metabolism,” Disease Models & Mechanisms 12, no. 8 (2019): dmm038174, 10.1242/dmm.038174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Omar‐Hmeadi M., Gucek A., and Barg S., “Local PI(4,5)P(2) Signaling Inhibits Fusion Pore Expansion During Exocytosis,” Cell Reports 42, no. 2 (2023): 112036, 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lourdes S. R., Gurung R., Giri S., Mitchell C. A., and McGrath M. J., “A New Role for Phosphoinositides in Regulating Mitochondrial Dynamics,” Advances in Biological Regulation 91 (2024): 101001, 10.1016/j.jbior.2023.101001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Di Paolo G. and De Camilli P., “Phosphoinositides in Cell Regulation and Membrane Dynamics,” Nature 443, no. 7112 (2006): 651–657, 10.1038/nature05185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Bridges D. and Saltiel A. R., “Phosphoinositides: Key Modulators of Energy Metabolism,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 857–866, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hsu F. and Mao Y., “The Structure of Phosphoinositide Phosphatases: Insights Into Substrate Specificity and Catalysis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 698–710, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Choi S., Thapa N., Tan X., Hedman A. C., and Anderson R. A., “PIP Kinases Define PI4,5P(2)signaling Specificity by Association With Effectors,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 711–723, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hammond G. R. V. and Burke J. E., “Novel Roles of Phosphoinositides in Signaling, Lipid Transport, and Disease,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology 63 (2020): 57–67, 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Murphy R. C. and Folco G., “Lysophospholipid Acyltransferases and Leukotriene Biosynthesis: Intersection of the Lands Cycle and the Arachidonate PI Cycle,” Journal of Lipid Research 60, no. 2 (2019): 219–226, 10.1194/jlr.S091371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Staiano L., De Leo M. G., Persico M., and De Matteis M. A., “Mendelian Disorders of PI Metabolizing Enzymes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 867–881, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Jungmichel S., Sylvestersen K. B., Choudhary C., Nguyen S., Mann M., and Nielsen M. L., “Specificity and Commonality of the Phosphoinositide‐Binding Proteome Analyzed by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry,” Cell Reports 6, no. 3 (2014): 578–591, 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hille B., Dickson E. J., Kruse M., Vivas O., and Suh B. C., “Phosphoinositides Regulate Ion Channels,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 844–856, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kuna R. S. and Field S. J., “GOLPH3: A Golgi Phosphatidylinositol(4)phosphate Effector That Directs Vesicle Trafficking and Drives Cancer,” Journal of Lipid Research 60, no. 2 (2019): 269–275, 10.1194/jlr.R088328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Davies E. M., Mitchell C. A., and Stenmark H. A., “Phosphoinositides in New Spaces,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 15, no. 9 (2023): a041406, 10.1101/cshperspect.a041406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Barneda D., Cosulich S., Stephens L., and Hawkins P., “How Is the Acyl Chain Composition of Phosphoinositides Created and Does It Matter?,” Biochemical Society Transactions 47, no. 5 (2019): 1291–1305, 10.1042/BST20190205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Alvarez‐Prats A., Bjelobaba I., Aldworth Z., et al., “Schwann‐Cell‐Specific Deletion of Phosphatidylinositol 4‐Kinase Alpha Causes Aberrant Myelination,” Cell Reports 23, no. 10 (2018): 2881–2890, 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Baba T., Alvarez‐Prats A., Kim Y. J., et al., “Myelination of Peripheral Nerves Is Controlled by PI4KB Through Regulation of Schwann Cell Golgi Function,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, no. 45 (2020): 28102–28113, 10.1073/pnas.2007432117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sohn M., Ivanova P., Brown H. A., et al., “Lenz‐Majewski Mutations in,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 16 (2016): 4314–4319, 10.1073/pnas.1525719113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Martin T. F., “PI(4,5)P(2)‐Binding Effector Proteins for Vesicle Exocytosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 785–793, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wallroth A. and Haucke V., “Phosphoinositide Conversion in Endocytosis and the Endolysosomal System,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 293, no. 5 (2018): 1526–1535, 10.1074/jbc.R117.000629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cocucci E., Aguet F., Boulant S., and Kirchhausen T., “The First Five Seconds in the Life of a Clathrin‐Coated Pit,” Cell 150, no. 3 (2012): 495–507, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bilanges B., Posor Y., and Vanhaesebroeck B., “PI3K Isoforms in Cell Signalling and Vesicle Trafficking,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 20, no. 9 (2019): 515–534, 10.1038/s41580-019-0129-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Levin R., Grinstein S., and Schlam D., “Phosphoinositides in Phagocytosis and Macropinocytosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 805–823, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Pizarro‐Cerda J., Kuhbacher A., and Cossart P., “Phosphoinositides and Host‐Pathogen Interactions,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 911–918, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ebner M., Koch P. A., and Haucke V., “Phosphoinositides in the Control of Lysosome Function and Homeostasis,” Biochemical Society Transactions 47, no. 4 (2019): 1173–1185, 10.1042/BST20190158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Li X., Rydzewski N., Hider A., et al., “A Molecular Mechanism to Regulate Lysosome Motility for Lysosome Positioning and Tubulation,” Nature Cell Biology 18, no. 4 (2016): 404–417, 10.1038/ncb3324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Claude‐Taupin A. and Morel E., “Phosphoinositides: Functions in Autophagy‐Related Stress Responses,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta ‐ Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1866, no. 6 (2021): 158903, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2021.158903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Baba T. and Balla T., “Emerging Roles of Phosphatidylinositol 4‐Phosphate and Phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐Bisphosphate as Regulators of Multiple Steps in Autophagy,” Journal of Biochemistry 168, no. 4 (2020): 329–336, 10.1093/jb/mvaa089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Tsujita K. and Itoh T., “Phosphoinositides in the Regulation of Actin Cortex and Cell Migration,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 824–831, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Cauvin C. and Echard A., “Phosphoinositides: Lipids With Informative Heads and Mastermind Functions in Cell Division,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 832–843, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Horvath S. E. and Daum G., “Lipids of Mitochondria,” Progress in Lipid Research 52, no. 4 (2013): 590–614, 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Watt S. A., Kular G., Fleming I. N., Downes C. P., and Lucocq J. M., “Subcellular Localization of Phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐Bisphosphate Using the Pleckstrin Homology Domain of Phospholipase C Delta1,” Biochemical Journal 363, no. Pt 3 (2002): 657–666, 10.1042/0264-6021:3630657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Hsieh C. W. and Yang W. Y., “Omegasome‐Proximal PtdIns(4,5)P2 Couples F‐Actin Mediated Mitoaggregate Disassembly With Autophagosome Formation During Mitophagy,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 969, 10.1038/s41467-019-08924-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lu G., Tan H. W. S., Schmauck‐Medina T., et al., “WIPI2 Positively Regulates Mitophagy by Promoting Mitochondrial Recruitment of VCP,” Autophagy 18, no. 12 (2022): 2865–2879, 10.1080/15548627.2022.2052461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Jang W., Puchkov D., Samso P., et al., “Endosomal Lipid Signaling Reshapes the Endoplasmic Reticulum to Control Mitochondrial Function,” Science 378, no. 6625 (2022): eabq5209, 10.1126/science.abq5209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Bryant J. M. and Blind R. D., “Signaling Through Non‐Membrane Nuclear Phosphoinositide Binding Proteins in Human Health and Disease,” Journal of Lipid Research 60, no. 2 (2019): 299–311, 10.1194/jlr.R088518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Fiume R., Stijf‐Bultsma Y., Shah Z. H., et al., “PIP4K and the Role of Nuclear Phosphoinositides in Tumour Suppression,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 898–910, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Lenk G. M., Berry I. R., Stutterd C. A., et al., “Cerebral Hypomyelination Associated With Biallelic Variants of FIG4,” Human Mutation 40, no. 5 (2019): 619–630, 10.1002/humu.23720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Zimmermann M., Schuster S., Boesch S., et al., “FIG4 Mutations Leading to Parkinsonism and a Phenotypical Continuum Between CMT4J and Yunis Varon Syndrome,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 74 (2020): 6–11, 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Campeau P. M., Lenk G. M., Lu J. T., et al., “Yunis‐Varon Syndrome Is Caused by Mutations in FIG4, Encoding a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase,” American Journal of Human Genetics 92, no. 5 (2013): 781–791, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Varghese P., Collins N., Warner G., Leitch J., Ho E., and Crock P., “Yunis‐Varon Syndrome: Further Delineation of Cardiovascular and Endocrine Outcome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 164A, no. 5 (2014): 1213–1217, 10.1002/ajmg.a.35741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Chow C. Y., Zhang Y., Dowling J. J., et al., “Mutation of FIG4 Causes Neurodegeneration in the Pale Tremor Mouse and Patients With CMT4J,” Nature 448, no. 7149 (2007): 68–72, 10.1038/nature05876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Nicholson G., Lenk G. M., Reddel S. W., et al., “Distinctive Genetic and Clinical Features of CMT4J: A Severe Neuropathy Caused by Mutations in the PI(3,5)P(2) Phosphatase FIG4,” Brain 134, no. Pt 7 (2011): 1959–1971, 10.1093/brain/awr148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Beloribi‐Djefaflia S., Morales R. J., Fatehi F., et al., “Clinical and Genetic Features of Patients Suffering From CMT4J,” Journal of Neurology 271, no. 3 (2024): 1355–1365, 10.1007/s00415-023-12076-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Cheikh BO B., Baulac S., Lahjouji F., et al., “A Locus for Bilateral Occipital Polymicrogyria Maps to Chromosome 6q16‐q22,” Neurogenetics 10, no. 1 (2008): 35–42, 10.1007/s10048-008-0143-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Baulac S., Lenk G. M., Dufresnois B., et al., “Role of the Phosphoinositide Phosphatase,” Neurology 82, no. 12 (2014): 1068–1075, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Chow C. Y., Landers J. E., Bergren S. K., et al., “Deleterious Variants of FIG4, a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, in Patients With ALS,” American Journal of Human Genetics 84, no. 1 (2009): 85–88, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Osmanovic A., Rangnau I., Kosfeld A., et al., “FIG4 Variants in Central European Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Whole‐Exome and Targeted Sequencing Study,” European Journal of Human Genetics 25, no. 3 (2017): 324–331, 10.1038/ejhg.2016.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Zara F., Biancheri R., Bruno C., et al., “Deficiency of Hyccin, a Newly Identified Membrane Protein, Causes Hypomyelination and Congenital Cataract,” Nature Genetics 38, no. 10 (2006): 1111–1113, 10.1038/ng1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Biancheri R., Zara F., Bruno C., et al., “Phenotypic Characterization of Hypomyelination and Congenital Cataract,” Annals of Neurology 62, no. 2 (2007): 121–127, 10.1002/ana.21175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Kraoua I., Bouyacoub Y., Drissi C., et al., “Hypomyelination and Congenital Cataract: Clinical, Imaging, and Genetic Findings in Three Tunisian Families and Literature Review,” Neuropediatrics 52, no. 4 (2021): 302–309, 10.1055/s-0041-1728654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Jacoby M., Cox J. J., Gayral S., et al., “INPP5E Mutations Cause Primary Cilium Signaling Defects, Ciliary Instability and Ciliopathies in Human and Mouse,” Nature Genetics 41, no. 9 (2009): 1027–1031, 10.1038/ng.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Bielas S. L., Silhavy J. L., Brancati F., et al., “Mutations in INPP5E, Encoding Inositol Polyphosphate‐5‐Phosphatase E, Link Phosphatidyl Inositol Signaling to the Ciliopathies,” Nature Genetics 41, no. 9 (2009): 1032–1036, 10.1038/ng.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Travaglini L., Brancati F., Silhavy J., et al., “Phenotypic Spectrum and Prevalence of INPP5E Mutations in Joubert Syndrome and Related Disorders,” European Journal of Human Genetics 21, no. 10 (2013): 1074–1078, 10.1038/ejhg.2012.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Sangermano R., Deitch I., Peter V. G., et al., “Broadening INPP5E Phenotypic Spectrum: Detection of Rare Variants in Syndromic and Non‐Syndromic IRD,” NPJ Genomic Medicine 6, no. 1 (2021): 53, 10.1038/s41525-021-00214-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Wiessner M., Roos A., Munn C. J., et al., “Mutations in INPP5K, Encoding a Phosphoinositide 5‐Phosphatase, Cause Congenital Muscular Dystrophy With Cataracts and Mild Cognitive Impairment,” American Journal of Human Genetics 100, no. 3 (2017): 523–536, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Osborn D. P. S., Pond H. L., Mazaheri N., et al., “Mutations in INPP5K Cause a Form of Congenital Muscular Dystrophy Overlapping Marinesco‐Sjogren Syndrome and Dystroglycanopathy,” American Journal of Human Genetics 100, no. 3 (2017): 537–545, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Hathazi D., Cox D., D'Amico A., et al., “INPP5K and SIL1 Associated Pathologies With Overlapping Clinical Phenotypes Converge Through Dysregulation of PHGDH,” Brain 144, no. 8 (2021): 2427–2442, 10.1093/brain/awab133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Huber C., Faqeih E. A., Bartholdi D., et al., “Exome Sequencing Identifies INPPL1 Mutations as a Cause of Opsismodysplasia,” American Journal of Human Genetics 92, no. 1 (2013): 144–149, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Below J. E., Earl D. L., Shively K. M., et al., “Whole‐Genome Analysis Reveals That Mutations in Inositol Polyphosphate Phosphatase‐Like 1 Cause Opsismodysplasia,” American Journal of Human Genetics 92, no. 1 (2013): 137–143, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. van Dijk T., Barth P., Reneman L., Appelhof B., Baas F., and Poll‐The B. T., “A De Novo Missense Mutation in the Inositol 1,4,5‐Triphosphate Receptor Type 1 Gene Causing Severe Pontine and Cerebellar Hypoplasia: Expanding the Phenotype of ITPR1‐Related Spinocerebellar Ataxia's,” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 173, no. 1 (2017): 207–212, 10.1002/ajmg.a.37962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. McEntagart M., Williamson K. A., Rainger J. K., et al., “A Restricted Repertoire of De Novo Mutations in ITPR1 Cause Gillespie Syndrome With Evidence for Dominant‐Negative Effect,” American Journal of Human Genetics 98, no. 5 (2016): 981–992, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Gerber S., Alzayady K. J., Burglen L., et al., “Recessive and Dominant De Novo ITPR1 Mutations Cause Gillespie Syndrome,” American Journal of Human Genetics 98, no. 5 (2016): 971–980, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. van de Leemput J., Chandran J., Knight M. A., et al., “Deletion at ITPR1 Underlies Ataxia in Mice and Spinocerebellar Ataxia 15 in Humans,” PLoS Genetics 3, no. 6 (2007): e108, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Gazulla J., Bellosta‐Diago E., Izquierdo‐Alvarez S., and Berciano J., “Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 15 Caused by Missense Variants in the ITPR1 Gene,” European Journal of Neurology 30, no. 8 (2023): 2539–2543, 10.1111/ene.15840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Zambonin J. L., Bellomo A., Ben‐Pazi H., et al., “Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 29 due to Mutations in ITPR1: A Case Series and Review of This Emerging Congenital Ataxia,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 12, no. 1 (2017): 121, 10.1186/s13023-017-0672-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Tolonen J. P., Parolin Schnekenberg R., McGowan S., et al., “Detailed Analysis of ITPR1 Missense Variants Guides Diagnostics and Therapeutic Design,” Movement Disorders 39, no. 1 (2024): 141–151, 10.1002/mds.29651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Cunha P., Petit E., Coutelier M., et al., “Extreme Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Non‐Expansion Spinocerebellar Ataxias,” American Journal of Human Genetics 110, no. 7 (2023): 1098–1109, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Klar J., Hisatsune C., Baig S. M., et al., “Abolished InsP3R2 Function Inhibits Sweat Secretion in Both Humans and Mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 124, no. 11 (2014): 4773–4780, 10.1172/JCI70720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Laporte J., Hu L. J., Kretz C., et al., “A Gene Mutated in X‐Linked Myotubular Myopathy Defines a New Putative Tyrosine Phosphatase Family Conserved in Yeast,” Nature Genetics 13, no. 2 (1996): 175–182, 10.1038/ng0696-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Blondeau F., Laporte J., Bodin S., Superti‐Furga G., Payrastre B., and Mandel J. L., “Myotubularin, a Phosphatase Deficient in Myotubular Myopathy, Acts on Phosphatidylinositol 3‐Kinase and Phosphatidylinositol 3‐Phosphate Pathway,” Human Molecular Genetics 9, no. 15 (2000): 2223–2229, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.hmg.a018913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Taylor G. S., Maehama T., and Dixon J. E., “Myotubularin, a Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Mutated in Myotubular Myopathy, Dephosphorylates the Lipid Second Messenger, Phosphatidylinositol 3‐Phosphate,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97, no. 16 (2000): 8910–8915, 10.1073/pnas.160255697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Amburgey K., Tsuchiya E., de Chastonay S., et al., “A Natural History Study of X‐Linked Myotubular Myopathy,” Neurology 89, no. 13 (2017): 1355–1364, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Biancalana V., Scheidecker S., Miguet M., et al., “Affected Female Carriers of MTM1 Mutations Display a Wide Spectrum of Clinical and Pathological Involvement: Delineating Diagnostic Clues,” Acta Neuropathologica 134, no. 6 (2017): 889–904, 10.1007/s00401-017-1748-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Lawlor M. W. and Dowling J. J., “X‐Linked Myotubular Myopathy,” Neuromuscular Disorders 31, no. 10 (2021): 1004–1012, 10.1016/j.nmd.2021.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Bolino A., Muglia M., Conforti F. L., et al., “Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Type 4B Is Caused by Mutations in the Gene Encoding Myotubularin‐Related Protein‐2,” Nature Genetics 25, no. 1 (2000): 17–19, 10.1038/75542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Wang H., Kacar Bayram A., Sprute R., et al., “Genotype‐Phenotype Correlations in Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Disease due to MTMR2 Mutations and Implications in Membrane Trafficking,” Frontiers in Neuroscience 13 (2019): 974, 10.3389/fnins.2019.00974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Pareyson D., Stojkovic T., Reilly M. M., et al., “A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Disease Type 4B (CMT4B) Associated With Mutations in Myotubularin‐Related Proteins (MTMRs),” Annals of Neurology 86, no. 1 (2019): 55–67, 10.1002/ana.25500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Attree O., Olivos I. M., Okabe I., et al., “The Lowe's Oculocerebrorenal Syndrome Gene Encodes a Protein Highly Homologous to Inositol Polyphosphate‐5‐Phosphatase,” Nature 358, no. 6383 (1992): 239–242, 10.1038/358239a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. De Matteis M. A., Staiano L., Emma F., and Devuyst O., “The 5‐Phosphatase OCRL in Lowe Syndrome and Dent Disease 2,” Nature Reviews. Nephrology 13, no. 8 (2017): 455–470, 10.1038/nrneph.2017.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Bokenkamp A. and Ludwig M., “The Oculocerebrorenal Syndrome of Lowe: An Update,” Pediatric Nephrology 31, no. 12 (2016): 2201–2212, 10.1007/s00467-016-3343-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Addis M., Meloni C., Tosetto E., et al., “An Atypical Dent's Disease Phenotype Caused by Co‐Inheritance of Mutations at CLCN5 and OCRL Genes,” European Journal of Human Genetics 21, no. 6 (2013): 687–690, 10.1038/ejhg.2012.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Duran D., Jin S. C., T. DeSpenza, Jr. , et al., “Digenic Mutations of Human OCRL Paralogs in Dent's Disease Type 2 Associated With Chiari I Malformation,” Human Genome Variation 3 (2016): 16042, 10.1038/hgv.2016.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. R. R. Hoopes, Jr. , Shrimpton A. E., Knohl S. J., et al., “Dent Disease With Mutations in OCRL1,” American Journal of Human Genetics 76, no. 2 (2005): 260–267, 10.1086/427887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Jin Y. Y., Huang L. M., Quan X. F., and Mao J. H., “Dent Disease: Classification, Heterogeneity and Diagnosis,” World Journal of Pediatrics 17, no. 1 (2021): 52–57, 10.1007/s12519-020-00357-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Pagnamenta A. T., Howard M. F., Wisniewski E., et al., “Germline Recessive Mutations in PI4KA Are Associated With Perisylvian Polymicrogyria, Cerebellar Hypoplasia and Arthrogryposis,” Human Molecular Genetics 24, no. 13 (2015): 3732–3741, 10.1093/hmg/ddv117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Verdura E., Rodriguez‐Palmero A., Velez‐Santamaria V., et al., “Biallelic PI4KA Variants Cause a Novel Neurodevelopmental Syndrome With Hypomyelinating Leukodystrophy,” Brain 144, no. 9 (2021): 2659–2669, 10.1093/brain/awab124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Baple E. L., Salter C., Uhlig H., Wolf N. I., and Crosby A. H., “PI4KA‐Related Disorder,” in GeneReviews®, ed. Adam M. P., Feldman J., Mirzaa G. M., Pagon R. A., Wallace S. E., and Amemiya A. (University of Washington, 1993). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Salter C. G., Cai Y., Lo B., et al., “Biallelic PI4KA Variants Cause Neurological, Intestinal and Immunological Disease,” Brain 144, no. 12 (2021): 3597–3610, 10.1093/brain/awab313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Zhang K., Kang L., Zhang H., et al., “A Synonymous Mutation in PI4KA Impacts the Transcription and Translation Process of Gene Expression,” Frontiers in Immunology 13 (2022): 987666, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.987666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Parmar J. M., McNamara E. L., Lamont P. J., et al., “Two Novel Variants in PI4KA in a Family Presenting With Hereditary Spastic Paraparesis: A Case Report,” Neurology Genetics 10, no. 3 (2024): e200152, 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Su X., Feng Y., Rahman S. A., et al., “Phosphatidylinositol 4‐Kinase β Mutations Cause Nonsyndromic Sensorineural Deafness and Inner Ear Malformation,” Journal of Genetics and Genomics 47, no. 10 (2020): 618–626, 10.1016/j.jgg.2020.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Mohamed M., Gardeitchik T., Balasubramaniam S., et al., “Novel Defect in Phosphatidylinositol 4‐Kinase Type 2‐Alpha (PI4K2A) at the Membrane‐Enzyme Interface Is Associated With Metabolic Cutis Laxa,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 43, no. 6 (2020): 1382–1391, 10.1002/jimd.12255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Alkhater R. A., Scherer S. W., Minassian B. A., and Walker S., “PI4K2A Deficiency in an Intellectual Disability, Epilepsy, Myoclonus, Akathisia Syndrome,” Annals of Clinical Translational Neurology 5, no. 12 (2018): 1617–1621, 10.1002/acn3.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Dafsari H. S., Pemberton J. G., Ferrer E. A., et al., “PI4K2A Deficiency Causes Innate Error in Intracellular Trafficking With Developmental and Epileptic‐Dyskinetic Encephalopathy,” Annals of Clinical Translational Neurology 9, no. 9 (2022): 1345–1358, 10.1002/acn3.51634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Galarreta C. I., Kennedy C., Blair D. R., and Slavotinek A., “Expanding the Phenotype of PIK3C2A Related Syndrome: Report of Two Siblings With Novel Features and Genotype,” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 188, no. 9 (2022): 2724–2731, 10.1002/ajmg.a.62881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Tiosano D., Baris H. N., Chen A., et al., “Mutations in PIK3C2A Cause Syndromic Short Stature, Skeletal Abnormalities, and Cataracts Associated With Ciliary Dysfunction,” PLoS Genetics 15, no. 4 (2019): e1008088, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Keppler‐Noreuil K. M., Rios J. J., Parker V. E., et al., “PIK3CA‐Related Overgrowth Spectrum (PROS): Diagnostic and Testing Eligibility Criteria, Differential Diagnosis, and Evaluation,” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 167A, no. 2 (2015): 287–295, 10.1002/ajmg.a.36836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Canaud G., Hammill A. M., Adams D., Vikkula M., and Keppler‐Noreuil K. M., “A Review of Mechanisms of Disease Across PIK3CA‐Related Disorders With Vascular Manifestations,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 16, no. 1 (2021): 306, 10.1186/s13023-021-01929-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Morin G. M., Zerbib L., Kaltenbach S., et al., “PIK3CA‐Related Disorders: From Disease Mechanism to Evidence‐Based Treatments,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 25, no. 1 (2024): 211–237, 10.1146/annurev-genom-121222-114518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Riviere J. B., Mirzaa G. M., O'Roak B. J., et al., “De Novo Germline and Postzygotic Mutations in AKT3, PIK3R2 and PIK3CA Cause a Spectrum of Related Megalencephaly Syndromes,” Nature Genetics 44, no. 8 (2012): 934–940, 10.1038/ng.2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Kurek K. C., Luks V. L., Ayturk U. M., et al., “Somatic Mosaic Activating Mutations in PIK3CA Cause CLOVES Syndrome,” American Journal of Human Genetics 90, no. 6 (2012): 1108–1115, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Rios J. J., Paria N., Burns D. K., et al., “Somatic Gain‐Of‐Function Mutations in PIK3CA in Patients With Macrodactyly,” Human Molecular Genetics 22, no. 3 (2013): 444–451, 10.1093/hmg/dds440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Rodriguez‐Laguna L., Ibanez K., Gordo G., et al., “CLAPO Syndrome: Identification of Somatic Activating PIK3CA Mutations and Delineation of the Natural History and Phenotype,” Genetics in Medicine 20, no. 8 (2018): 882–889, 10.1038/gim.2017.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Angulo I., Vadas O., Garcon F., et al., “Phosphoinositide 3‐Kinase Delta Gene Mutation Predisposes to Respiratory Infection and Airway Damage,” Science 342, no. 6160 (2013): 866–871, 10.1126/science.1243292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Jamee M., Moniri S., Zaki‐Dizaji M., et al., “Clinical, Immunological, and Genetic Features in Patients With Activated PI3Kδ Syndrome (APDS): A Systematic Review,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology 59, no. 3 (2019): 323–333, 10.1007/s12016-019-08738-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Lucas C. L., Chandra A., Nejentsev S., Condliffe A. M., and Okkenhaug K., “PI3Kdelta and Primary Immunodeficiencies,” Nature Reviews. Immunology 16, no. 11 (2016): 702–714, 10.1038/nri.2016.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Maccari M. E., Wolkewitz M., Schwab C., et al., “Activated Phosphoinositide 3‐Kinase Delta Syndrome: Update From the ESID Registry and Comparison With Other Autoimmune‐Lymphoproliferative Inborn Errors of Immunity,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 152, no. 4 (2023): 984–996, 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Sogkas G., Fedchenko M., Dhingra A., Jablonka A., Schmidt R. E., and Atschekzei F., “Primary Immunodeficiency Disorder Caused by Phosphoinositide 3–Kinase δ Deficiency,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 142, no. 5 (2018): 1650–1653.e2, 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Swan D. J., Aschenbrenner D., Lamb C. A., et al., “Immunodeficiency, Autoimmune Thrombocytopenia and Enterocolitis Caused by Autosomal Recessive Deficiency of PIK3CD‐Encoded Phosphoinositide 3‐Kinase δ,” Haematologica 104, no. 10 (2019): e483–e486, 10.3324/haematol.2018.208397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Takeda A. J., Maher T. J., Zhang Y., et al., “Human PI3Kγ Deficiency and Its Microbiota‐Dependent Mouse Model Reveal Immunodeficiency and Tissue Immunopathology,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 4364, 10.1038/s41467-019-12311-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Thian M., Hoeger B., Kamnev A., et al., “Germline Biallelic PIK3CG Mutations in a Multifaceted Immunodeficiency With Immune Dysregulation,” Haematologica 105, no. 10 (2020): e488, 10.3324/haematol.2019.231399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Deau M. C., Heurtier L., Frange P., et al., “A Human Immunodeficiency Caused by Mutations in the PIK3R1 Gene,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 124, no. 9 (2014): 3923–3928, 10.1172/JCI75746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Thauvin‐Robinet C., Auclair M., Duplomb L., et al., “PIK3R1 Mutations Cause Syndromic Insulin Resistance With Lipoatrophy,” American Journal of Human Genetics 93, no. 1 (2013): 141–149, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Avila M., Dyment D. A., Sagen J. V., et al., “Clinical Reappraisal of SHORT Syndrome With PIK3R1 Mutations: Toward Recommendation for Molecular Testing and Management,” Clinical Genetics 89, no. 4 (2016): 501–506, 10.1111/cge.12688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Shvalb N. F., “SHORT Syndrome: An Update on Pathogenesis and Clinical Spectrum,” Current Diabetes Reports 22, no. 12 (2022): 571–577, 10.1007/s11892-022-01495-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Conley M. E., Dobbs A. K., Quintana A. M., et al., “Agammaglobulinemia and Absent B Lineage Cells in a Patient Lacking the p85Alpha Subunit of PI3K,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 209, no. 3 (2012): 463–470, 10.1084/jem.20112533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Tang P., Upton J. E. M., Barton‐Forbes M. A., et al., “Autosomal Recessive Agammaglobulinemia due to a Homozygous Mutation in PIK3R1,” Journal of Clinical Immunology 38, no. 1 (2018): 88–95, 10.1007/s10875-017-0462-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Akula S. K., Chen A. Y., Neil J. E., et al., “Exome Sequencing and the Identification of New Genes and Shared Mechanisms in Polymicrogyria,” JAMA Neurology 80, no. 9 (2023): 980–988, 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.2363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Mirzaa G. M., Conti V., Timms A. E., et al., “Characterisation of Mutations of the Phosphoinositide‐3‐Kinase Regulatory Subunit, PIK3R2, in Perisylvian Polymicrogyria: A Next‐Generation Sequencing Study,” Lancet Neurology 14, no. 12 (2015): 1182–1195, 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00278-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Dobyns W. B. and Mirzaa G. M., “Megalencephaly Syndromes Associated With Mutations of Core Components of the PI3K‐AKT‐MTOR Pathway: PIK3CA, PIK3R2, AKT3, and MTOR,” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics 181, no. 4 (2019): 582–590, 10.1002/ajmg.c.31736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Al Tassan N., Khalil D., Shinwari J., et al., “A Missense Mutation in PIK3R5 Gene in a Family With Ataxia and Oculomotor Apraxia,” Human Mutation 33, no. 2 (2012): 351–354, 10.1002/humu.21650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Li S., Tiab L., Jiao X., et al., “Mutations in PIP5K3 Are Associated With Francois‐Neetens Mouchetee Fleck Corneal Dystrophy,” American Journal of Human Genetics 77, no. 1 (2005): 54–63, 10.1086/431346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Gee J. A., Frausto R. F., Chung D. W., et al., “Identification of Novel PIKFYVE Gene Mutations Associated With Fleck Corneal Dystrophy,” Molecular Vision 21 (2015): 1093–1100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Mei S., Wu Y., Wang Y., et al., “Disruption of PIKFYVE Causes Congenital Cataract in Human and Zebrafish,” eLife 11 (2022): e71256, 10.7554/eLife.71256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Rodriguez‐Solana P., Arruti N., Nieves‐Moreno M., et al., “Whole Exome Sequencing of 20 Spanish Families: Candidate Genes for Non‐Syndromic Pediatric Cataracts,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 14 (2023): 1–27, 10.3390/ijms241411429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Narkis G., Ofir R., Landau D., et al., “Lethal Contractural Syndrome Type 3 (LCCS3) is Caused by a Mutation in PIP5K1C, Which Encodes PIPKI Gamma of the Phophatidylinsitol Pathway,” American Journal of Human Genetics 81, no. 3 (2007): 530–539, 10.1086/520771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Zhang F., Guo H., Zhou X., et al., “Novel PIP5K1C Variant Identified in a Chinese Pedigree With Lethal Congenital Contractural Syndrome 3,” BMC Pediatrics 24, no. 1 (2024): 182, 10.1186/s12887-024-04674-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Morleo M., Venditti R., Theodorou E., et al., “De Novo Missense Variants in Phosphatidylinositol Kinase PIP5KIγ Underlie a Neurodevelopmental Syndrome Associated With Altered Phosphoinositide Signaling,” American Journal of Human Genetics 110, no. 8 (2023): 1377–1393, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Myers K. A., “PLCB1 Biallelic Point Mutations Cause West Syndrome,” Pediatric Neurology 91 (2019): 62–64, 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2018.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Desprairies C., Valence S., Maurey H., et al., “Three Novel Patients With Epileptic Encephalopathy due to Biallelic Mutations in the PLCB1 Gene,” Clinical Genetics 97, no. 3 (2020): 477–482, 10.1111/cge.13696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Ben‐Salem S., Robbins S. M., Lm Sobreira N., et al., “Defect in Phosphoinositide Signalling Through a Homozygous Variant in PLCB3 Causes a New Form of Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia With Corneal Dystrophy,” Journal of Medical Genetics 55, no. 2 (2018): 122–130, 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Rieder M. J., Green G. E., Park S. S., et al., “A Human Homeotic Transformation Resulting From Mutations in PLCB4 and GNAI3 Causes Auriculocondylar Syndrome,” American Journal of Human Genetics 90, no. 5 (2012): 907–914, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Vegas N., Demir Z., Gordon C. T., et al., “Further Delineation of Auriculocondylar Syndrome Based on 14 Novel Cases and Reassessment of 25 Published Cases,” Human Mutation 43, no. 5 (2022): 582–594, 10.1002/humu.24349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Zhang Y., Zhao Y., Dai L., Liu Y., and Shi Z., “Auriculocondylar Syndrome 2 Caused by a Novel PLCB4 Variant in a Male Chinese Neonate: A Case Report and Review of the Literature,” Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine 12, no. 4 (2024): e2441, 10.1002/mgg3.2441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Kiuru M., Kurban M., Itoh M., et al., “Hereditary Leukonychia, or Porcelain Nails, Resulting From Mutations in PLCD1,” American Journal of Human Genetics 88, no. 6 (2011): 839–844, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Conway J., Henry T. J., Cohen L. L., Ricardo J. W., and Lipner S. R., “Identification of a Novel Homozygous Missense Mutation in the Phospholipase C, Delta‐1 Gene Associated With Leukonychia in a Middle Eastern Patient,” JAAD Case Reports 43 (2024): 69–71, 10.1016/j.jdcr.2023.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Horer S., Marrakchi S., Radner F. P. W., et al., “A Monoallelic Two‐Hit Mechanism in PLCD1 Explains the Genetic Pathogenesis of Hereditary Trichilemmal Cyst Formation,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 139, no. 10 (2019): 2154–2163 e5, 10.1016/j.jid.2019.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Liu K., Luo J., Ma T., et al., “Germline Mutation of PLCD1 Contributes to Human Multiple Pilomatricomas Through Protein Kinase D/Extracellular Signal‐Regulated Kinase1/2 Cascade and TRPV6,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 141, no. 3 (2021): 533–544, 10.1016/j.jid.2020.05.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Hinkes B., Wiggins R. C., Gbadegesin R., et al., “Positional Cloning Uncovers Mutations in PLCE1 Responsible for a Nephrotic Syndrome Variant That May Be Reversible,” Nature Genetics 38, no. 12 (2006): 1397–1405, 10.1038/ng1918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Boyer O., Benoit G., Gribouval O., et al., “Mutational Analysis of the PLCE1 Gene in Steroid Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome,” Journal of Medical Genetics 47, no. 7 (2010): 445–452, 10.1136/jmg.2009.076166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Ombrello M. J., Remmers E. F., Sun G., et al., “Cold Urticaria, Immunodeficiency, and Autoimmunity Related to PLCG2 Deletions,” New England Journal of Medicine 366, no. 4 (2012): 330–338, 10.1056/NEJMoa1102140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Baysac K., Sun G., Nakano H., et al., “PLCG2‐Associated Immune Dysregulation (PLAID) Comprises Broad and Distinct Clinical Presentations Related to Functional Classes of Genetic Variants,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 153, no. 1 (2024): 230–242, 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Drissi I., Fletcher E., Shaheen R., et al., “Mutations in Phospholipase C Eta‐1 (PLCH1) are Associated With Holoprosencephaly,” Journal of Medical Genetics 59, no. 4 (2022): 358–365, 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Pilarski R., Burt R., Kohlman W., Pho L., Shannon K. M., and Swisher E., “Cowden Syndrome and the PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome: Systematic Review and Revised Diagnostic Criteria,” JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 105, no. 21 (2013): 1607–1616, 10.1093/jnci/djt277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Mester J. and Eng C., “When Overgrowth Bumps Into Cancer: The PTEN‐Opathies,” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics 163, no. 2 (2013): 114–121, 10.1002/ajmg.c.31364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Liaw D., Marsh D. J., Li J., et al., “Germline Mutations of the PTEN Gene in Cowden Disease, an Inherited Breast and Thyroid Cancer Syndrome,” Nature Genetics 16, no. 1 (1997): 64–67, 10.1038/ng0597-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Lachlan K. L., Lucassen A. M., Bunyan D., and Temple I. K., “Cowden Syndrome and Bannayan Riley Ruvalcaba Syndrome Represent One Condition With Variable Expression and Age‐Related Penetrance: Results of a Clinical Study of PTEN Mutation Carriers,” Journal of Medical Genetics 44, no. 9 (2007): 579–585, 10.1136/jmg.2007.049981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Sutphen R., Diamond T. M., Minton S. E., Peacocke M., Tsou H. C., and Root A. W., “Severe Lhermitte‐Duclos Disease With Unique Germline Mutation of PTEN,” American Journal of Medical Genetics 82, no. 4 (1999): 290–293, 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990212)82:4<290::aid-ajmg3>3.0.co;2–0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Zhou X. P., Marsh D. J., Hampel H., Mulliken J. B., Gimm O., and Eng C., “Germline and Germline Mosaic PTEN Mutations Associated With a Proteus‐Like Syndrome of Hemihypertrophy, Lower Limb Asymmetry, Arteriovenous Malformations and Lipomatosis,” Human Molecular Genetics 9, no. 5 (2000): 765–768, 10.1093/hmg/9.5.765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Butler M. G., Dasouki M. J., Zhou X. P., et al., “Subset of Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Extreme Macrocephaly Associated With Germline PTEN Tumour Suppressor Gene Mutations,” Journal of Medical Genetics 42, no. 4 (2005): 318–321, 10.1136/jmg.2004.024646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Nathan N., Keppler‐Noreuil K. M., Biesecker L. G., Moss J., and Darling T. N., “Mosaic Disorders of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/TSC/mTORC1 Signaling Pathway,” Dermatologic Clinics 35, no. 1 (2017): 51–60, 10.1016/j.det.2016.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Nakhro K., Park J. M., Hong Y. B., et al., “SET Binding Factor 1 (SBF1) Mutation Causes Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Disease Type 4B3,” Neurology 81, no. 2 (2013): 165–173, 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829a3421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Flusser H., Halperin D., Kadir R., Shorer Z., Shelef I., and Birk O. S., “Novel SBF1 Splice‐Site Null Mutation Broadens the Clinical Spectrum of Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Type 4B3 Disease,” Clinical Genetics 94, no. 5 (2018): 473–479, 10.1111/cge.13419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Senderek J., Bergmann C., Weber S., et al., “Mutation of the SBF2 Gene, Encoding a Novel Member of the Myotubularin Family, in Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Neuropathy Type 4B2/11p15,” Human Molecular Genetics 12, no. 3 (2003): 349–356, 10.1093/hmg/ddg030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Lassuthova P., Vill K., Erdem‐Ozdamar S., et al., “Novel SBF2 Mutations and Clinical Spectrum of Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Neuropathy Type 4B2,” Clinical Genetics 94, no. 5 (2018): 467–472, 10.1111/cge.13417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Dyment D. A., Smith A. C., Humphreys P., et al., “Homozygous Nonsense Mutation in SYNJ1 Associated With Intractable Epilepsy and Tau Pathology,” Neurobiology of Aging 36, no. 2 (2015): 1222–1225, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Hardies K., Cai Y., Jardel C., et al., “Loss of SYNJ1 Dual Phosphatase Activity Leads to Early Onset Refractory Seizures and Progressive Neurological Decline,” Brain 139, no. 9 (2016): 2420–2430, 10.1093/brain/aww180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Lesage S., Mangone G., Tesson C., et al., “Clinical Variability of SYNJ1‐Associated Early‐Onset Parkinsonism,” Frontiers in Neurology 12 (2021): 648457, 10.3389/fneur.2021.648457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Xie F., Chen S., Cen Z. D., et al., “A Novel Homozygous SYNJ1 Mutation in Two Siblings With Typical Parkinson's Disease,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 69 (2019): 134–137, 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Lines M. A., Ito Y., Kernohan K. D., et al., “Yunis‐Varon Syndrome Caused by Biallelic VAC14 Mutations,” European Journal of Human Genetics 25, no. 9 (2017): 1049–1054, 10.1038/ejhg.2017.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Lenk G. M., Szymanska K., Debska‐Vielhaber G., et al., “Biallelic Mutations of VAC14 in Pediatric‐Onset Neurological Disease,” American Journal of Human Genetics 99, no. 1 (2016): 188–194, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Baumann H., Tunc S., Gunther A., Munchau A., Lohmann K., and Bruggemann N., “Altered Homodimer Formation and Increased Iron Accumulation in VAC14‐Related Disease: Case Report and Review of the Literature,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 80 (2020): 41–46, 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Raghu P., Joseph A., Krishnan H., Singh P., and Saha S., “Phosphoinositides: Regulators of Nervous System Function in Health and Disease,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 12 (2019): 208, 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Ratti S., Follo M. Y., Ramazzotti G., et al., “Nuclear Phospholipase C Isoenzyme Imbalance Leads to Pathologies in Brain, Hematologic, Neuromuscular, and Fertility Disorders,” Journal of Lipid Research 60, no. 2 (2019): 312–317, 10.1194/jlr.R089763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Durieux A. C., Vignaud A., Prudhon B., et al., “A Centronuclear Myopathy‐Dynamin 2 Mutation Impairs Skeletal Muscle Structure and Function in Mice,” Human Molecular Genetics 19, no. 24 (2010): 4820–4836, 10.1093/hmg/ddq413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Fradet A. and Fitzgerald J., “INPPL1 Gene Mutations in Opsismodysplasia,” Journal of Human Genetics 62, no. 2 (2017): 135–140, 10.1038/jhg.2016.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Juss J. K., Hayhoe R. P., Owen C. E., et al., “Functional Redundancy of Class I Phosphoinositide 3‐Kinase (PI3K) Isoforms in Signaling Growth Factor‐Mediated Human Neutrophil Survival,” PLoS One 7, no. 9 (2012): e45933, 10.1371/journal.pone.0045933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Saettini F., Guerra F., Mauri M., et al., “Biallelic PI4KA Mutations Disrupt B‐Cell Metabolism and Cause B‐Cell Lymphopenia and Hypogammaglobulinemia,” Journal of Clinical Immunology 45, no. 1 (2024): 15, 10.1007/s10875-024-01793-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Li Z., Jiang H., Xie W., Zhang Z., Smrcka A. V., and Wu D., “Roles of PLC‐β2 and ‐β3 and PI3Kγ in Chemoattractant‐Mediated Signal Transduction,” Science 287, no. 5455 (2000): 1046–1049, 10.1126/science.287.5455.1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Troutman T. D., Bazan J. F., and Pasare C., “Toll‐Like Receptors, Signaling Adapters and Regulation of the Pro‐Inflammatory Response by PI3K,” Cell Cycle 11, no. 19 (2012): 3559–3567, 10.4161/cc.21572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Li J., Yen C., Liaw D., et al., “PTEN, a Putative Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Gene Mutated in Human Brain, Breast, and Prostate Cancer,” Science 275, no. 5308 (1997): 1943–1947, 10.1126/science.275.5308.1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Miled N., Yan Y., Hon W. C., et al., “Mechanism of Two Classes of Cancer Mutations in the Phosphoinositide 3‐Kinase Catalytic Subunit,” Science 317, no. 5835 (2007): 239–242, 10.1126/science.1135394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Goncalves M. D., Hopkins B. D., and Cantley L. C., “Phosphatidylinositol 3‐Kinase, Growth Disorders, and Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 379, no. 21 (2018): 2052–2062, 10.1056/NEJMra1704560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Brown J. S., Amend S. R., Austin R. H., Gatenby R. A., Hammarlund E. U., and Pienta K. J., “Updating the Definition of Cancer,” Molecular Cancer Research 21, no. 11 (2023): 1142–1147, 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-23-0411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. M. M. Cohen, Jr. , “Perspectives on Overgrowth Syndromes,” American Journal of Medical Genetics 79, no. 4 (1998): 234–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Manor J. and Lalani S. R., “Overgrowth Syndromes‐Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management,” Frontiers in Pediatrics 8 (2020): 574857, 10.3389/fped.2020.574857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Venot Q., Blanc T., Rabia S. H., et al., “Targeted Therapy in Patients With PIK3CA‐Related Overgrowth Syndrome,” Nature 558, no. 7711 (2018): 540–546, 10.1038/s41586-018-0217-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Nadjkovic K. and Lonabaugh K., “Alpelisib: A Novel Agent for PIK3CA‐Related Overgrowth Spectrum,” Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics 28, no. 7 (2023): 590–594, 10.5863/1551-6776-28.7.590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Rajala R. V. S., “Signaling Roles of Phosphoinositides in the Retina,” Journal of Lipid Research 62 (2021): 100041, 10.1194/jlr.TR120000806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Idevall‐Hagren O. and De Camilli P., “Detection and Manipulation of Phosphoinositides,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1851, no. 6 (2015): 736–745, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
