Skip to main content
Molecular Pathology : MP logoLink to Molecular Pathology : MP
. 2003 Feb;56(1):25–28. doi: 10.1136/mp.56.1.25

A novel polymerase chain reaction assay to detect Mycoplasma genitalium

K Eastick 1, J P Leeming 1, E O Caul 2, P J Horner 3, M R Millar 1
PMCID: PMC1187285  PMID: 12560459

Abstract

Aims: To design and validate a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Mycoplasma genitalium.

Methods: Primers were designed that were complementary to the 16S rRNA gene sequence of M genitalium. After optimisation of the reaction conditions, the PCR was tested against nine M genitalium strains, a dilution series of M genitalium DNA, and a panel of common microorganisms. The PCR was also challenged in parallel with a published assay against 54 urine specimens from men with urethritis.

Results: The expected 341 bp product was produced on amplification of material from all M genitalium strains and from none of the other microorganisms tested. The lower limit of detection was 50 genome copies. The new assay detected M genitalium DNA in nine of 54 men with urethritis, in comparison with eight positive specimens detected with the alternative PCR.

Conclusions: This novel PCR targeting the M genitalium 16S rRNA gene has been optimised and now provides a sensitive and specific alternative or addition to the available MgPa gene targeting assays.

Keywords: Mycoplasma genitalium, polymerase chain reaction, urethritis


Mycoplasma genitalium was first isolated from two men with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) in 1981.1 Cultivation of the organism has proved difficult even in the complex media typically used for mycoplasma culture. Axenic primary culture can take up to three months to produce a positive result and is not sensitive diagnostically.2 The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been applied to the detection of M genitalium and has been used to show the presence of the organism in men with NGU,3–7 a disease for which an aetiological agent is frequently not identified. Although a proportion of healthy men carry the organism, M genitalium carriage is significantly associated with NGU, independent of Chlamydia trachomatis (reviewed in Taylor-Robinson and colleagues8).2,3,6,7 The UK national guideline for the management of NGU states that M genitalium probably causes the disease and that treatment should reflect this.9 Mycoplasma genitalium has been found in the genital tract of women, many with genitourinary disease,10–13 and has recently been associated with both cervicitis14 and endometritis.15

Mycoplasma genitalium carriage is significantly associated with non-gonococcal urethritis, independent of Chlamydia trachomatis

There is currently no commercially available test for M genitalium and most published PCR assays target either the MgPa major adhesin gene11,16 or the 16S rRNA gene.17–19 The protein encoded by MgPa, the first M genitalium gene to be sequenced, is a virulence determinant and major antigen so that is an appropriate target for the PCR. However, surface expressed antigens often have unstable gene sequences and intraspecies variation in the MgPa gene has been reported.20 It is likely that the 16S rRNA gene sequence is relatively stable and therefore contains few, if any, polymorphisms in the M genitalium population. In the absence of non-amplification tests it is in any case desirable to be able to detect more than one gene target to confirm positive results and therefore to confirm the prevalence in a specific population group.

We have designed a sensitive and specific PCR assay targeting the 16S rRNA gene of M genitalium and have validated the assay against previously published methods using urine specimens from men with urethritis attending a genitourinary medicine clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Polymerase chain reaction

Oligonucleotide primers corresponding to sequences within the M genitalium 16S rRNA gene were synthesised as follows:

  • 16SFG2: 5′-CCT TAT CGT TAG TTA CAT TGT TTA A-3′ (nucleotides 1096–1220; GenBank accession number X77334).

  • 16SRG: 5′-TGA CAT GCG CTT CCA ATA AA-3′ (nucleotides 1418–1436; GenBank accession number X77334).

Each PCR reaction (in a 500 μl microcentrifuge tube) consisted of: 0.25 U superTaq polymerase (HT Biotechnology Ltd, Cambridge, UK), 5 μl 10× superTaq reaction buffer (100mM Tris/HCl, pH 9.0, 15mM MgCl2, 500mM KCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% wt/vol stabiliser; HT Biotechnology Ltd), 20 μM each dNTP (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), 10 nM each oligonucleotide primer, 5 μl template DNA, or negative control, and water for injections (B Braun Medical Ltd, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK) to a total volume of 50 μl. The reaction mix was protected from evaporation by a large drop (approximately 50 μl) of filter sterilised liquid paraffin (AnalaR; BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, Dorset, UK). Thermal cycling was carried out in an OmniGene instrument (Hybaid, Teddington, Middlesex, UK).

A modified “hot start”21 was used, whereby the reaction mix was held at 75°C during addition of the template, and the temperature of the mix was not permitted to fall below the annealing temperature until completion of the run.

Cycling began with an initial denaturation step of three minutes at 94°C, then 45 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 50°C, and 60 seconds at 72°C, followed by a final extension step of seven minutes at 72°C. Products were visualised by agarose gel electrophoresis alongside a 100 bp ladder (GibcoBRL, Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). The expected product size was 341 bp.

Assay validation

Amplification of target and non-target microorganisms

Various microorganisms were suspended in water and heated to 100°C for 10 minutes. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and 5 μl of supernatant added to the PCR assay described above. Table 1 lists the species and strains tested.

Table 1.

Organisms tested by 16S based PCR for Mycoplasma genitalium

M genitalium strains (ref) Mollicute species Other microorganisms
G371 Mycoplasma pneumoniae (NCTC 10119) Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2
TW101 Mycoplasma pirum (NCTC 11702) Burkholderia cepacia
R321 Mycoplasma gallisepticum (NCTC 10115) Haemophilus influenzae
UTMB1 Mycoplasma primatum (NCTC 10163) Coagulase negative staphylococcus sp
TW4822 Mycoplasma hominis (NCTC 10111) Pseudomonas aeruginosa
M-234123 Mycoplasma orale (NCTC 10112) Candida albicans
M-232123 Mycoplasma salivarium (NCTC 10113) Corynebacterium xerosus
M-228823 Mycoplasma lipophilum (NCTC 10173) Escherichia coli
M-230023 Mycoplasma buccale (NCTC 10136) Group A streptococcus sp
Ureaplasma urealyticum (NCTC 10177) Klebsiella pneumoniae
Acholeplasma laidlawii (NCTC 10116) Group B streptococcus sp
Enterococcus sp
Bacillus sp
Branhamella catarrhalis
Bacteroides fragilis
Micrococcus sp
Clostridium ramosum
Bacillus cereus
Clostridium perfringens
Lactobacillus casei
Bacteroides urealyticus
Clostridium sp

Detection limit of the PCR

Freeze dried M genitalium strain TW48-5G was suspended in SP4 medium and the nucleic acid was extracted by the alkaline lysis method,24 purified using an equal volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (pH 8.0; Sigma Chemical Co, Poole Dorset, UK) (twice), and precipitated in an equal volume of ice cold isopropanol and 1/10 volume ammonium acetate (10M). Nucleic acid was pelleted at 15 000 ×g for 15 minutes, washed twice in 70% ethanol and once in 100% ethanol, before drying under vacuum and dissolving in 100 μl pure water (AnalaR; BDH). The quantity of DNA present was determined using a GeneQuant spectrophotometer (Pharmacia LKB Biochrom Ltd, Cambridge, UK).

Ten and twofold dilution series were made of the DNA, and used to determine the detection limit of the PCR.

Usefulness of the test with clinical specimens

First catch urine specimens were taken from consecutive male patients with urethritis attending the Bristol Royal Infirmary genitourinary medicine clinic. Patients were diagnosed with NGU if there were more than five polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNLs) in each high power (×1000) microscope field (HPF) in five or more fields of a Gram stained urethral smear, or > 10 PMNLs/HPF in five or more fields of a Gram stained thread from 15–20 ml of a first passed urine specimen and Neisseria gonorrhoeae was not cultured from a urethral swab. Seven of 54 men had a history of urethritis in the previous three months, suggesting that they were suffering from chronic or recurrent urethritis.

Before storage at −20°C, the urine specimens were tested for Chlamydia trachomatis by standard laboratory methods: positive results with IDEIA, an amplified enzyme immunoassay (Novo Nordisk Diagnostics, Cambridge, UK), were confirmed using direct fluorescent antibody (MicroTrak; Syva, Palo Alto, California, USA).

The research ethics committee of the United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust granted permission to test urine specimens from men with urethritis for M genitalium.

Urine specimens were brought to room temperature and mixed thoroughly. One millilitre of urine was centrifuged at 15 000 ×g for five minutes. The pellet was washed twice in phosphate buffered saline, resuspended in 20 μl 10% Chelex 100 resin (BioRad Laboratories, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK) in deionised water and held at 100°C for 10 minutes. The slurry was pulse centrifuged to pellet the resin, and 5 μl of the supernatant used in the PCR.25

Both the 16S rRNA gene PCR and an adhesin gene based PCR11 were performed on each specimen. The adhesin gene based assay was performed using reagent concentrations and cycling times optimised for assay components and cyclers used locally (those used for the 16S PCR). The concentration of MgCl2 was 4.5mM (as published) and the concentration of each primer was reduced from 200nM to 20nM. The concentration of the dNTPs was reduced from 125μM to 20μM. The annealing temperature for the primers was 60°C and 40 cycles of PCR were performed (as recommended by JS Jensen, personal communication, 1996). Primer sequences were as follows:

  • MgPa1: 5′-AGT TGA TGA AAC CTT AAC CCC TTG G-3′.11

  • MgPa3: 5′-CCG TTG AGG GGT TTT CCA TTT TTG C-3′.11

The modified hot start was not used. Sensitivity of the PCR was confirmed to be comparable to that obtained in the author’s laboratory by use of positive control DNA kindly donated by JS Jensen (Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark).

Specimens positive by either or both the adhesin gene and 16S based tests were retested by a heminested adhesin gene PCR.5,16 Again, the assay was adapted to local practice: primer concentrations were reduced from 1 μg/reaction to 20nM and dNTP concentrations from 200μM to 20μM in a reaction volume of 50 μl. Thirty five cycles were performed at each stage of the PCR, with hold times as in the 16S PCR. Primer sequences were as follows:

  • MgP1: 5′-GGT TAA CTT ACC TAG TGG CTT TGA TC-3′.5

  • Mg2: 5′-CTG CTT TGG TCA AGA CAT CA-3′.16

  • Mg3: 5′-GTA ATT AGT TAC TCA GTA GA-3′.16

The assay retained a very low minimum level of detection.

RESULTS

Assay validation

DNA preparations from all nine strains of M genitalium and none of the other organisms were positive by PCR, producing the expected 341 bp product. Preparations from all other organisms tested gave no observable PCR products.

The nucleic acid obtained from M genitalium strain TW48-5G was estimated by the GeneQuant instrument as 66% pure. The A260/A280 ratio was 1.190, and the concentration of DNA was calculated as 72 μg/ml. Each genome copy is 580 kbp or 0.476 fg. Using these figures the sensitivity of the PCR is 24 fg M genitalium DNA, equivalent to about 50 genome copies. This was similar to the sensitivity of 7 fg achieved using both the comparator and confirmatory adhesin gene based tests when challenged with a dilution series of the same DNA extract.

Usefulness of the test with clinical specimens

Tables 2 and 3 show the results of these investigations. Nine of 54 specimens (16.7%) gave a positive result with the 16S rDNA based PCR for M genitalium when products were examined by gel electrophoresis. Eight of these men were also positive by the MgPa gene PCR method of Jensen et al,11 and all were confirmed using the MgPa gene heminested PCR.16 Eight men were positive for C trachomatis. Two of the M genitalium positive men were also infected with C trachomatis. One patient had Gram negative diplococci (presumptively N gonorrhoeae) on a urethral smear but was not positive for M genitalium or C trachomatis.

Table 2.

Comparison of Mycoplasma genitalium detection in men with urethritis by two different PCR assays

16S based PCR
Positive Negative
MgPa based PCR (non-nested)
    Positive 8 0
    Negative 1 55

Table 3.

Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis detection in men with urethritis

M genitalium (16S based PCR)
Positive Negative
C trachomatis (EIA)
    Positive 2 6
    Negative 7 49

EIA, enzyme immunoassay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

DISCUSSION

The M genitalium 16S based PCR was tested against a range of target and non-target microorganisms. A product of the correct size was obtained from all M genitalium isolates tested and from no other mollicute. The modified hot start procedure was necessary to prevent amplification of DNA from a bacillus sp isolate. No amplification was seen with the other organisms tested, either with or without the hot start.

“This assay is useful as a confirmatory assay or as an alternative to MgPa based assays, and may be less susceptible to intraspecies genetic polymorphism”

Take home messages.

  • We have developed and optimised a novel PCR targeting the Mycoplasma genitalium 16S rRNA gene

  • This assay provides a sensitive and specific alternative or addition to the available MgPa gene targeting assays

In the study of urine specimens, 16S rDNA based PCR performed slightly better than did the non-nested adhesin gene based PCR. This could result from heterogeneity in the adhesin gene, although no such heterogeneity has been reported in this region. The proportion of men identified as M genitalium positive is low compared with that found in many of the previous PCR based studies of comparable subjects; the range for men with urethritis being 10–50%.8 The specimens had been stored at −20°C, and both the storage conditions and the freeze thaw cycle may have caused degradation of M genitalium DNA. This is unlikely to have affected the comparative sensitivities of the assays and the prevalence is compatible with a later, unpublished, survey of unfrozen samples from men in the Bristol area. The low prevalence may be accounted for by the small size of the study, but is also compatible with variations of M genitalium prevalence in men with NGU between populations or over time caused by geographical variation, ethnic composition, local sexual practices, the prevalence of virulent strains, or other, unknown, factors. Such factors may also account for the low prevalence of C trachomatis compared with other studies of comparable subjects in Bristol. It is possible that this is because we used IDEIA, which has a reported sensitivity of 80% in a similar population.26 However, this loss of sensitivity is unlikely to account for the large discrepancy between the observed and expected C trachomatis prevalence in the group studied. It has been proposed that the prevalence of chlamydial infection in men may be lower in those without symptoms or signs9,27; we did not collect this information and it is possible that the inclusion of men with NGU but no signs or symptoms is the cause of the unexpectedly low rates of both M genitalium and C trachomatis.

In conclusion, on a small sample of patients, the novel PCR assay appears to be at least as sensitive as a previously published non-nested assay, detects DNA from a range of M genitalium isolates, and shows no crossreactivity with the common microorganisms tested. It is useful as a confirmatory assay or as an alternative to MgPa based assays, and may be less susceptible to intraspecies genetic polymorphism.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a Public Health Laboratory Service Research and Development grant. Dr V Battu helped with clinical information concerning men attending the Milne Centre. Mycoplasma genitalium G37 broth culture was kindly donated by Dr M Sillis of Norwich Public Health Laboratory. Mycoplasma genitalium TW10, R32, UTMB, and TW48 were kindly donated as lyophilised cultures by Dr J Tully, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Mycoplasma genitalium G37, M-2341, M-2321, M-2288, and M-2300 were kindly donated as purified nucleic acid by Dr J S Jensen, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark. Dr Jensen and Dr C Gilroy gave advice on modifying their assays.

Abbreviations

  • HPF, high power field

  • IDEIA, amplified enzyme immunoassay

  • NGU, non-gonococcal urethritis

  • PCR, polymerase chain reaction

  • PMNL, polymorphonuclear leucocyte

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tully JG, Taylor-Robinson D, Cole RM, et al. A newly-discovered mycoplasma in the human urogenital tract. Lancet 1981;i:1288–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Taylor-Robinson D, Furr PM, Hanna NF. Microbiological and serological study of non-gonococcal urethritis with special reference to Mycoplasma genitalium. Genitourin Med 1985;61:319–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Horner PJ, Gilroy CB, Thomas BJ, et al.. Association of Mycoplasma genitalium with acute non-gonococcal urethritis. Lancet 1993;342:582–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taylor-Robinson D, Gilroy CB, Hay PE. Occurrence of Mycoplasma genitalium in different populations and its clinical significance. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17(suppl I):S66–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deguchi T, Gilroy CB, Taylor-Robinson D. Comparison of two PCR-based assays for detecting Mycoplasma genitalium in clinical specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1995;14:629–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Janier M, Lassau F, Casin I, et al. Male urethritis with and without discharge: a clinical and microbiological study. Sex Transm Dis 1995;22:244–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jensen JS, Orsum R, Dohn B, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium: a cause of male urethritis? Genitourin Med 1993;69:265–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taylor-Robinson D, Horner PJ. The role of Mycoplasma genitalium in nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Infect 2001;77:229–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clinical Effectiveness Group (Association of Genitourinary Medicine and the Medical Society for the Study of Venereal Diseases). National guideline for the management of non-gonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Infect 1991;75(suppl 1):S9–12. [Revised 2001 and available at http://www.mssvd.org.uk/CEG/ceguidelines.htm.] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Palmer HM, Gilroy CB, Claydon EJ, et al. Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in the genitourinary tract of women by the polymerase chain reaction. Int J STD AIDS 1991;2:261–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jensen JS, Uldum SA, Søndergård-Andersen J, et al.. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:46–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Blanchard A, Hamrick W, Duffy L, et al. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycoplasma fermentans and Mycoplasma genitalium in the urogenital tract and amniotic fluid. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17(suppl I):S272–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Uno M, Deguchi T, Komeda H, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium in the cervices of Japanese women. Sex Transm Dis 1997;24:284–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Manhart LE, Dutro SM, Holmes KK et al. Mycoplasma genitalium is associated with mucopurulent cervicitis [abstract]. Int J STD AIDS 2001;12(suppl 2):69. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cohen CR, Manhart LE, Bukusi EA, et al. Association between Mycoplasma genitalium and acute endometritis. Lancet 2002;359:765–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Palmer HM, Gilroy CB, Furr PM, et al. Development and evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycoplasma genitalium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1991;77:199–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sasaki Y, Shintani M, Shimada T, et al. Detection and discrimination of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium by the in vitro DNA amplification. Microbiol Immunol 1992;36:21–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jensen JS, Borre MB. Sequence determination of the Mycoplasma genitalium 16S ribosomal RNA gene and development of a species specific PCR [abstract]. IOM Lett 1994;3;332–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yoshida T, Deguchi T, Ito M, et al. Quantitative detection of Mycoplasma genitalium from first-pass urine of men with urethritis and asymptomatic men by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40;1451–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peterson SN, Bailey CC, Jensen JS, et al. Characterisation of repetitive DNA in the Mycoplasma genitalium genome: possible role in the generation of antigenic variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:11829–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chou Q, Russell M, Birch DE, et al. Prevention of pre-PCR mis-priming and primer dimerization improves low-copy-number amplifications. Nucleic Acids Res 1992;20:1717–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tully JG, Rose DL, Baseman JB, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium mixture in synovial fluid isolate. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1851–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jensen JS, Hansen HT, Lind K. Isolation of Mycoplasma genitalium strains from the male urethra. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:286–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T, eds. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989.
  • 25.Lebech A-M, Hansen K. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in urine samples and cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with early and late Lyme neuroborreliosis by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:1646–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tanaka M, Nakayama H, Sagiyama K, et al. Evaluation of a new amplified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male urine, female endocervical swab, and patient obtained vaginal swab specimens. J Clin Pathol 2000;53:350–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Horner PJ, Thomas B, Gilroy CB, et al. Do all men, attending departments of genitourinary medicine, need to be screened for non-gonococcal urethritis? Int J STD AIDS 2002;13:667–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES