Abstract
Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a neglected parasitic infection with a particular impact in humans and livestock. The current investigation was undertaken to design and evaluate a DNA vaccine encoding Echinococcus granulosus Eg95-1 to EG95-6, P29, and GST against hydatid cyst infection in BALB/c mice. Initially, B-cell, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte, and helper T-lymphocyte epitopes were forecasted using B-cell epitope prediction server (BCPREDS) and Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) server, respectively, and a vaccine construct incorporating multiple epitopes was rationally designed and comprehensively analyzed through in silico modeling and simulation studies. Next, Escherichia coli TOP10 was transformed by the recombinant pcDNA 3.1 plasmid and mass production, followed by plasmid extraction, was done. The BALB/c mouse immunization was done with 50 and 100 μg concentrations of plasmid combined with IL-12 adjuvant or alone. Mouse sera and splenic lymphocytes were used for the measurement of specific humoral and cellular responses. The candidate vaccine model weighed 37.49 kDa with 338 residues antigenic, while nonallergenic, soluble, stable, highly thermotolerant, and hydrophilic in nature. Expression in HEK-293 cells was successfully achieved, as evidenced by the detection of a 37 kDa protein band in the western blot analysis. Vaccine doses, especially the 100 μg concentration, alone or in combination with an adjuvant, induced a T-helper 1 (Th1)–type immune response. This was evidenced by higher levels of IgG2a antibody and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) along with lower levels of interleukin 4 (IL-4). Although the groups that received the 50-μg dose of vaccine alone or with adjuvant showed a lower immune response, overall, the vaccinated groups showed statistically significant differences compared to the control groups (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and pcDNA). The promising results of this vaccine candidate can be further examined using challenges with various parasite genotypes.
Keywords: Echinococcus granulosus, EG95-1-6, epitope, GST, immunogenicity, P29, vaccine
1. Introduction
Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (E. granulosus s.l.) is a zoonotic cestode species with a widespread distribution, present in canid intestinal tract, and it is the causative agent of cystic hydatid disease (CHD) or cystic echinococcosis (CE), a condition affecting humans and a broad range of other mammalian species [1]. According to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) roadmap, CE has been included within the 20 neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) worldwide [2]. In the areas of endemicity, such as central Asia, the Mediterranean Basin, and South America, the incidence of CE ranges between 1 and 200 per 100,000 individuals, particularly in poor rural communities having pastoral activities [3, 4]. Although the mortality remains to be low (2%–4%) [5], CE poses a remarkable burden to the health system, because of high treatment costs regarding chemotherapy and operational surgery [6]. Also, the disease negatively impacts on the productive and reproductive performances of affected farm animals, including reduced milk, meat, and wool production [7]. Environmental contamination of food/water resources by infected canids is the primary route of infection in intermediate (ungulates and lagomorphs) and/or incidental (humans) hosts [8]. The released oncosphere reaches the liver and lungs, which represent the most frequently affected organs, via circulation, and the development of hydatid cysts occurs very slowly throughout the years [9]. The parasite, also, demonstrates extensive genetic variation, and several genotypes have been confirmed for E. granulosus s.l. species cluster, including G1 and G3 as E. granulosus sensu stricto (E. granulosus s.c.), Echinococcus equinus (previously known as G4), Echinococcus ortleppi (formerly known as G5), G6/7 genotypic cluster, G8, and G10 as E. canadensis, as well as Echinococcus felidis. Of note, G2 and G9 are recognized as microvariants of G3 and G7, respectively [10]. Overall, diagnosis, treatment, and vaccine development against CE may be relatively affected by differences in antigenicity, infectivity, and cyst fertility of the above genotypes [11].
The CE remains a significant zoonotic infection in many parts of the world, in spite of regular dosing of dogs, enhanced slaughter hygiene, and the wide use of anthelmintics [12]. The increasing concern on drug-resistant parasites, due to long-term underdosing, and the occurrence of residual drug compounds in the meat and milk products derived from food animals subjected to therapeutic interventions emphasize the need for better, cost-effective control strategies, including vaccination programs [13]. An ideal vaccine against E. granulosus s.l. infections prevents the oncospheral evolution to hydatid disease in affected livestock and humans, while it may also inhibit the maturation of tapeworms in canids [7]. Thus, designing multivalent vaccines using crucial target antigens (reviewed in [14]) is of utmost medical and veterinary importance. Also, using different antigens would yield a more enhanced protective effect in experimental studies rather than single-antigen formulated vaccine candidates [15]. The EG95 protein is a 170-kDa molecule encoded by a multigene family (EG95-1 to EG95-7) and is very conserved among E. granulosus s.l. isolates. The sheep vaccine, EG95, is the most studied and evaluated vaccine against CE [16, 17], which has shown promising results based on clinical trials in China and South America, with up to 96% protection [18, 19]. P29 is a protoscolex and hydatid cyst antigen that possesses a pivotal role in host–parasite interaction, and the recombinant protein was shown to induce about 94.5% immunoprotection in sheep [20, 21]. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) represent a major group of multifunctional proteins directed towards detoxification of endogenous and/or exogenous toxic compounds, and some studies have shown protective effects exerted by vaccination using this protein [22, 23].
The target proteins chosen for vaccine development are not without limitations. For instance, P29 protein has been identified in the cyst germinal layer, whereas it is absent in extracts of adult worms. Additionally, regarding EG95, most research has concentrated on the G1 genotype. However, genetic differences, such as amino acid substitutions in the G6/G7 genotypes, may reduce the immunogenicity and effectiveness of the recombinant antigen. These variations underscore the importance of further exploring the EG95 gene family across diverse E. granulosus strains to enhance the vaccine's applicability and efficacy [24, 25].
The life cycle complexity of E. granulosus s.l. and its genetic diversity demand planning novel vaccination strategies [26], which can be reached by the utilization of stringent immunoinformatics (computational immunology) analyses [27]. Immunoinformatics assists us in accurate B- and T-cell-specific epitope screening and selection followed by construction of a potent vaccine candidate, for virulent antigenic proteins of a given pathogen in a cost- and time-effective manner [28]. This investigation was carried out with the purpose of developing a potential vaccine candidate through the design of a plasmid construct harboring the E. granulosus antigenic proteins Eg95-1 to Eg95-6, P29, and GST and subsequently assessing its protective capabilities against hydatid disease in the BALB/c mouse model.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. In Silico Analyses
2.1.1. Collecting Protein Sequences
For the immunoinformatics evaluation of the selected protein sequences and designing a multiepitope vaccine, the amino acid sequences of E. granulosus EG95-1 (Accession Number UKD60510.1), EG-95-2 (Accession Number AAG40126.1), EG95-3 (Accession Number AAG40128.1), EG95-4 (Accession Number AAG40124.1), EG95-5 (Accession Number AAG40125.1), EG95-6 (Accession Number AAG40123.1), P29 (Accession Number AHA85390.1), and GST (Accession Number AAD16438.1) were collected in FASTA format by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [29].
2.1.2. Prediction of Immunogenic B- and T-Cell Epitopes
In order to predict continuous B-cell epitopes in the selected proteins, the B-cell epitope prediction server (BCPREDS) web server (http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/bcepred) [30] was used, which provides three methods of prediction, including BCPred, ABCPred, and AAP. In this study, BCPred approach was used for prediction with a succession kernel-based support vector machine (SVM) classifier and > 0.75 cutoff score. The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (IEDB) was employed for the prediction of binding affinity between the selected peptides in protein sequences with mouse Class I (http://tools.iedb.org/mhci) (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) epitopes) and Class II (http://tools.iedb.org/mhcii) (helper T-lymphocyte (HTL) epitopes) major histocompatibility complex (MHC) [31, 32]. Those epitopes having lower percentile ranks were anticipated to possess the highest affinity. A consensus method was selected to predict 13-mer MHC-I (H2-Db, H2-Dd, H2-Kb, H2-Kd, H2-Kk, and H2-Ld) and 15-mer MHC-II epitopes (H2-IAb and H2-IAd).
2.1.3. Multiepitope Vaccine Construction
Those high-ranked HTL epitopes were chosen from each protein sequence to assemble the multiepitope vaccine construct. The epitopes were connected together using “SAPGTP” cleavable linker that enhances the segregation and processing of epitopes in the microcellular milieu. Also, a Kozak-like sequence was added to the N-terminal of the candidate vaccine sequence. Finally, the multiepitope vaccine construct consisted of six epitopic regions and GST gene complete (Table 1).
Table 1.
Utilized E. granulosus s.l. genes, proteins, and peptides for vaccine design in the present study.
| Gene | Method | Start | End | Protein/peptide | Length | Percentile rank | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GST2 | Complete CDS protein | — | — | >AAD16438.1 glutathione S-transferase [Echinococcus granulosus] MAPTLAYWDIRGLAEQSRLLLKYLEVEYDDKRYKIGSTPTFDRSAWLSEKFSLGLDFPNLPYYIDGDFKLTQSGAILEYIADRHGMIPDCKKRRAVLHMLQCEVVDLRMAFTRTCYSPDFEKLKPGLFETLAQKLPNFEAYLGEKEWLTGDKINYPDFSLCELLNQLMKFEPTCLEKYPRLKAYLSRFENLPALRDYMASKEFKTRPCNGASAKWRGDC |
219 | — | [71] |
| P29 | IEDB MHCII | 40 | 54 | IDQMKAWISKIITAT | 15 | 0.0098 | Current study |
| P29 | IEDB MHCII | 100 | 114 | QLSKMLTEASDVHQR | 15 | 0.0095 | Current study |
| EG95-5 | IEDB MHCII | 103 | 117 | TVEAMRAKAAILKFT | 15 | 0.0227 | Current study |
| EG95-5 | IEDB MHCII | 96 | 110 | PSTLYEITVEAMRAK | 15 | 0.0760 | Current study |
| EG95-1,2,3,4 | IEDB MHCII | 98 | 112 | TLYKMTVEAVKAKKT | 15 | 0.0366 | Current study |
| EG95-1,2,3,4 | IEDB MHCII | 94 | 108 | LKPSTLYKMTVEAVK | 15 | 0.0098 | Current study |
2.1.4. Prediction of Physicochemical Properties and Posttranslational Modifications (PTMs)
Some of the major physicochemical features of the final construct, including grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY), instability index, aliphatic index, extinction coefficients, evaluated in vitro and in vivo half-life, total number of positively and negatively charged residues, hypothetical isoelectric point (pI), molecular weight (MW), and number of amino acids, were forecasted using ExPASy ProtParam web server, available at https://web.expasy.org/protparam [33]. Moreover, some of the PTMs such as N-glycosylation, acylation, and phosphorylation were predicted for the multiepitope vaccine, using NetNGlyc (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/) [34], NetAcet (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetAcet/) [35], and NetPhos (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos/) [36] servers, respectively.
2.1.5. Antigenicity, Allergenicity, and Solubility Prediction
Two web tools, ANTIGENpro (http://scratch.proteomics.ics.uci.edu) and VaxiJen v2.0 (http://www.ddg-pharmfac.net/vaxijen/VaxiJen/VaxiJen.html), were utilized for the forecasting of antigenicity. The latter server employs auto-cross-covariance (ACC) to generate vectors of major amino acid features from protein sequences. Also, ANTIGENpro provides a pathogen-independent prediction using protein microarray analysis outputs [37, 38]. In the following, the allergenicity of the final construct was evaluated using AlgPred server with 85% accuracy (threshold: 0.4) and based on a hybrid approach (http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/algpred) [39]. The protein solubility was, also, forecasted upon overexpression via SOLpro web server (http://scratch.proteomics.ics.uci.edu) [40].
2.1.6. Secondary and Tertiary Structure Predictions and Validation
The secondary structural characteristics of the final vaccine candidate construct were computationally elucidated and modeled using the Garnier–Osguthorpe–Robson (GOR) online web server and its bioinformatic algorithms (http://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_gor4.html) [41]. Furthermore, a computation-aided homology modelling server, SWISS-MODEL, was utilized which predicts three-dimensional (3D) models of our multiepitope vaccine based on various templates (https://swissmodel.expasy.org) [42]. Additionally, to validate the fidelity of the predicted 3D structural model, a Ramachandran plot analysis was performed utilizing the PROCHECK online bioinformatic tool and its associated algorithms (https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu/) [43].
2.1.7. Codon Optimization and In Silico Cloning
Codon optimization was done to enhance the proper expression of codons, based on the chosen (prokaryotic/eukaryotic) host. For this purpose, Java Codon Adaptation Tool (JCat) online server (http://www.jcat.de) was used to adapt the codons of the final vaccine model to Escherichia coli [44]. The output generated by the server is provided in the form of a graphical representation depicting the guanine–cytosine content percentage (GC%) and the codon adaptation index (CAI value). A CAI value between 0.8 and 1 and a GC% between 30% and 70% are optimum [45]. Moreover, NEBcutter v2.0 (http://nc2.neb.com/NEBcutter2) was selected to explore the cutting sites of a wide range of restriction enzymes within the codon-adapted sequence. In this study, BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites were embedded at the N-terminal and C-terminal of the nucleotide sequence of the vaccine. The finally codon-adapted protein was further ligated into the pcDNA3.1 plasmid vector and sent for construction and cloning into the pcDNA3.1 vector.
2.2. Transformation of E. coli TOP10 Strain by Recombinant pcDNA3.1
The recombinant pcDNA3.1 plasmid vector was maintained and amplified in the E. coli TOP10 strain cultivated in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth supplemented with 100 μg/mL of the ampicillin antibiotic, with incubation carried out overnight at 30°C to facilitate vector propagation and enrichment. A colony PCR was done in a 25 μL reaction, containing 2 μl Master Mix (Ampliqon, Denmark), 1 μL of each forward and reverse primer (10 pmol), 21-μL distilled water (DW), and a separate grown colony on LB agar supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Also, the insertion of recombinant pcDNA3.1 in E. coli TOP10 bacteria was confirmed by sequencing of the purified plasmids and the results were blasted (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) with the reference sequences of each selected E. granulosus protein. Next, for large-scale plasmid extraction and purification, the Vivantis plasmid extraction kit (Vivantis Technologies, Malaysia) was used, based on the manufacturer's protocol.
2.3. Transfection and Storage of Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK)-293 Cells
For this purpose, purified plasmid DNA (25 μg/mL) diluted in Tris-HCl (1:10) was combined with 100 μL of CaCl2 solution (2.5 M) and adjusted to a final volume of 1 mL using sterile DW. Equal volumes of this solution were immediately mixed with 2X 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer (274 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 2.5 mM sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate (Na2HPO4-7H2O), 12 mM dextrose, and 42 mM HEPES) for a few seconds until turbidity indicative of agglutination was observed. The mixture was centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 30 s at 0°C. The pellet (100 μL/1 mL culture medium) was added to HEK-293 cells that had been cultured overnight in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium supplemented with fetal calf serum (FCS) enriched with 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37°C under 5% CO2. The incubation was carried out for 2–6 h. Subsequently, the cells were exposed to 20% glycerol in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 min. After discarding the glycerol, freshly prepared medium was added, and incubation continued at 37°C under 5% CO2 for 1–3 days. Finally, the HEK-293 cells were washed with PBS, transferred to 1.5 mL microtubes, and stored at −20°C for further use.
2.4. Confirmation and Quantification of Vaccine Protein Production
The disruption of transfected HEK-293 cell membranes was achieved through consecutive freeze–thaw cycles with 4 μL protease inhibitor, followed by five 1-min sonication steps. After centrifugation (3000 rpm, 5 min), the pellet was prepared for sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blotting. The pellet was mixed (3:1) with 4X sample buffer containing 2% w/v SDS, 0.05% w/v bromophenol blue, %v/v2-mercaptoethanol, 10% v/v glycerol, and 4.5 mM Tris-HCl; heated at 100°C for 5 min; and run on a 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel (80–120 V, 2 h) before staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. For western blotting, proteins were transferred from the SDS-PAGE gel onto a nitrocellulose membrane (MilliporeSigma, United States) in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris (pH 8.3), 192 mM glycine, 20% methanol) overnight at 15–30 V. The membrane was blocked with bovine serum albumin (BSA) in tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBS-T) (0.02 M Tris pH = 8.5, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20) overnight at 4°C, then cut into 3-mm ribbons and incubated with 1–2 mL of patient sera at room temperature for 2–3 h. After three washes with TBS-T (10 min each), the ribbons were incubated with antihuman peroxidase conjugate (diluted 1:1000) for 2 h, followed by additional washes with TBS-T and PBS. Finally, diaminobenzidine (DAB) peroxidase (0.015% H2O2, 0.05% DAB, and 0.1 M PBS pH = 7.2) solution was applied to visualize the protein bands in brown [46].
2.5. Mass Extraction of the Recombinant pcDNA3.1 Plasmid Vector
At first, the recombinant bacteria were transferred to 50 mL LB medium with 50 μg/mL ampicillin and incubated overnight in a shaking incubator at 37°C. Again, 1–2 mL of the cultivated bacteria were subcultured into a new LB medium and incubated at previous conditions. The cultures were centrifuged (13,000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C), the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was mixed with 5 mL of Solution I (sterile mixture of 9.9 glucose, 3.94 g Tris-HCl, and 3.722 g EDTA in 1 L DW). In the following, 10 mL of Solution II (2 mL of 1 N NaOH, 1 mL of 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 7 mL sterile DW) was added and the tube was shaken well. After 8-min incubation on ice, 7.5 mL of Solution III (60 mL of 5 M acetate potassium, 11.5 mL glacial acetic acid, and 28.5 mL DW; filtered) and 30–40 μL RNase A (stock: 10 mg/mL) were added and shaken well. Upon 20-min incubation on ice, centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C) was done and the supernatant was transferred to a 50-mL tube; then, equal volume of cold isopropanol was added, gently shaken, and incubated in a refrigerator for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended in 1-mL sterile DW, 500 μL phenol, and 500 μL chloroform were added and upon centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C), the supernatant (aqueous phase containing plasmid) was transferred to new sterile microtubes. This step was performed twice for higher yield of extracted plasmid. In the following, 3 M acetate sodium was added as 0.1 volume of the supernatants and cold absolute ethanol was added as two volumes of the supernatants. The microtubes were incubated overnight at −20°C, centrifugation was performed (12,000 rpm, 15 min), the supernatant was discarded, 200–300 μL of cold 70% ethanol was added to each microtube then eluted, and the tubes were completely dried. Finally, 100-μL sterile DW was added to resuspend the purified pelleted recombinant plasmids and kept at −20°C for further use.
2.6. In Vivo Experiment
2.6.1. Animals
Female inbred BALB/c mice aged 6–8 weeks with a body weight of 20 ± 1 g were purchased from the animal breeding center of Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute. Standard conditions in terms of light, food, and water were provided for mice. The current study was approved by the Ethics of Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran (IR.MODARES.REC.1400.302).
2.6.2. Immunization and Challenge
Seven experimental groups (10 mice/group) were sorted for current investigation, including (1) receiving PBS, (2) receiving empty pcDNA3.1 plasmid vector, (3) receiving only IL-12 genetic adjuvant, (4) 100 μg recombinant plasmid without IL-12 genetic adjuvant, (5) 50 μg recombinant plasmid without IL-12 genetic adjuvant, (6) 100 μg recombinant plasmid with IL-12 genetic adjuvant, and (7) 50 μg recombinant plasmid with IL-12 genetic adjuvant. The immunization experiment (100 μL) was done three times with 2-week intervals (Days 0, 14, and 28) as intramuscular injection into the quadriceps muscle of mice using insulin syringe.
About 2–4 weeks after the last immunization, a number of 2000 viable E. granulosus protoscoleces (washed with PBS) were intraperitoneally injected to the vaccinated mice. These protoscoleces were extracted from sheep hydatid cysts isolated from local abattoirs, and their viability was validated through trypan blue staining. The challenged mice were maintained for about 8.5 months for hydatid cyst development, then euthanized using chloroform, and finally, the cyst sizes were measured using calipers, and the number of cysts was counted. Subsequently, comparisons were made between the different groups.
2.6.3. Antibody Titers and Isotype Determination
In order to detect specific antibodies, the blood samples were collected randomly from five mice per each group at Days 14 and 28 postvaccination, the sera were separated and stored at −20°C until examined. The presence of specific IgG total, IgG1, and IgG2a antibodies in sera of BALB/c mice was assessed in triplicate, using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits from Karmania Pars Gene (Kerman, Iran) based on the manufacturer's instructions. The optical density (OD) of all samples was determined at 450 nm using ELISA reader.
2.6.4. Cytokine Assay
To this end, 14 days after the last vaccination, three mice in each experimental group were euthanized and lymphocytes were harvested under aseptic conditions for cytokine evaluation [47]. The harvested lymphocytes were cultivated in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Next, 500 μL of extracted lymphocyte suspension of each mouse was cultured in two wells of a 24-well cell culture plate, challenged with 50 μg of crude antigen prepared [48], and the volume of each well was reached to 1 mL using complete RPMI medium. The plates were incubated for 48–72 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. Finally, the supernatant of each well was harvested and centrifuged (3000 rpm, 10 min); then, interferon γ (IFN-γ) and interleukin 4 (IL-4) cytokines were measured in triplicate by commercial ELISA kits (Karmania Pars Gene, Kerman, Iran), based on the manufacturer's protocol.
2.7. Statistical Analysis
The results of IgG total, IgG1, IgG2a, IFN-γ, and IL-4 were analyzed as mean and standard deviation (SD) for each experimental group using one-way ANOVA and Mann–Whitney statistics in SPSS statistics v.22. Also, the diagrams were drawn by Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism applications. The protection percentage was calculated using the following formula: 1 − (average number of cysts in immunized groups/average number of cysts in the control group) × 100.
3. Results
3.1. Computer-Based Vaccine Design and Validation
3.1.1. Basic Characteristics of the Vaccine Model
Based on the epitope prediction results, those potent HTL (n = 6) epitopes were chosen for multiepitope vaccine construction, being connected together with “SAPGTP” linker (Figure 1). The final vaccine candidate model possessed a length of 338 amino acids and comprised BamHI and EcoRI cutting sites, the start/stop codon, and a Kozak-like sequence. This multiepitope vaccine candidate possessed a MW of 37.49 kDa, a relatively neutral pI (9.27), and over 30-h half-life in mammalian reticulocytes. Moreover, it was demonstrated to be a stable protein (instability index: 32.36), having high thermotolerance (aliphatic index: 90.68), and it was hydrophilic in nature (GRAVY: −0.177). The designed vaccine had single acetylation (position: 3), 0 N-glycosylation, and 53 phosphorylation sites (Table 2). Alpha helix (52.07%) was the most prominent secondary structure in the vaccine model, followed by random coil (30.77%), extended strand (10.65%), and beta turn (6.51%) (Figure 2(a)). The vaccine candidate model was predicted using the SWISS-MODEL web server (Figure 2(b)), and three conformational B-cell epitopes were predicted with the following properties: (i) 17 residues, score: 0.813; (ii) 11 residues, score: 0.784; and (iii) 21 residues, score: 0.763 (Figure 2(c)) was further refined, and the Ramachandran plot analysis showed that 93.4%, 6.1%, 0.5%, and 0.0% of the residues were assigned to the most favored, additional allowed, generously allowed, and disallowed regions, respectively (Figure 2(d)). Additionally, the vaccine candidate model was found to be antigenic (antigenicity score: 0.4048), nonallergenic, and relatively soluble (solubility score: 0.527) in nature, as predicted by VaxiJen v2.0, AlgPred, and SOLpro web servers, respectively. Codon optimization results showed that the CAI value and GC% were improved from 0.62% and 45.85% before adaptation, respectively, to the 1% and 50.61% after codon adaptation. Finally, the multiepitope fragment with the above desired properties was synthesized by a gene synthesis company. The resulting synthetic construct was subsequently used as an immunogen in subsequent steps.
Figure 1.

The final epitopes for DNA vaccine designed by several servers and use of linkers between them. GST2, complete gene (yellow); P29 (green); EG95/5 (gray); EG95/1, 2, 3, and 4 (blue); linker (red).
Table 2.
Prediction of physicochemical parameter and PTM sites of the designed vaccine candidate.
| Parameter | Results | Tools | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of residues | 338 | ProtParam | [72] |
| MW | 37.49 kDa | ||
| Speculated pI | 9.27 | ||
| Estimated half-life | >30 h | ||
| Instability index | 32.36 | ||
| Aliphatic index | 90.68 | ||
| GRAVY | −0.177 | ||
| Signal peptide | No | SignalP-4.1 | [72] |
| N-Glycosylation sites | 0 | NetNGlyc 1.0 | [72] |
| Phosphorylation sites | 53 | NetPhos 3.1 | [72] |
| N-Terminal acetylation | 1 | NetAcet 1.0 | [72] |
Figure 2.

Structural analysis of the designed multiepitope vaccine candidate against cystic echinococcosis in mice. (a) Predicted secondary structure by the GOR-IV server (h = helix; e = extended strand; c = coil). (b) The predicted 3D model of the designed vaccine candidate protein, provided by the SWISS-MODEL server. (c) Conformational B-cell epitopes predicted using ElliPro tool of the IEDB server. (d) Ramachandran plot analysis of the 3D refined model, showing 93.4%, 6.1%, 0.5%, and 0.0% of the residues in the most favored, additional allowed, generously allowed, and disallowed regions, respectively.
3.2. In Vivo Experiments
3.2.1. Protein Expression
The results of the SDS-PAGE analysis revealed that the protein expressed from the plasmid in transfected HEK-293 eukaryotic cells had a molecular weight within the range of 35–45 kDa (Figure 3(a)). This was further confirmed through western blot analysis, which identified a distinct band of approximately 37 kDa using an antihistidine tag antibody (Figure 3(b)).
Figure 3.

Protein expression. (a) SDS-PAGE shows a prominent band in the 35–40 kDa range. (b) Western blot analysis confirms the presence of a protein with a molecular weight of 37 kDa. Positive: transfected cells containing multiepitope vaccine; negative: transfected cells containing pcDNA3.1 (negative control).
3.2.2. Measurement of Humoral Immune Responses
With respect to the measurement of total IgG, the highest OD during two bleeding timepoints belonged to those mice receiving 100 μg plasmid + adjuvant, followed by those receiving 50 μg plasmid + adjuvant and 100 μg plasmid alone as well as adjuvant alone. Of note, the lowest OD was associated with the first (Day 14) and second (Day 28) bleeding timepoints of the PBS group (Figure 4). Similar results were found regarding IgG2a titer estimation, except for the last two lowest ODs, belonging to the adjuvant along and 100 μg plasmid alone, respectively (Figure 5). Also, the trend of IgG1 was similar to that of total IgG (Figure 6).
Figure 4.

Mean ± SD of the obtained ODs (450 nm) regarding IgG total levels in the experimental groups in Days 14 and 28 (micrograms per milliliter).
Figure 5.

Mean ± SD of the obtained ODs (450 nm) regarding IgG2a levels in the experimental groups in Days 14 and 28 (micrograms per milliliter).
Figure 6.

Mean ± SD of the obtained ODs (450 nm) regarding IgG1 levels in the experimental groups in Days 14 and 28 (micrograms per milliliter).
3.2.3. Measurement of Cell-Mediated Responses
Based on our results, the PBS and then pcDNA3.1 groups had the lowest rates, while the highest IFN-γ belonged to the 100 μg plasmid + adjuvant, followed by 50 μg plasmid + adjuvant and 100 μg plasmid alone. Moreover, the highest IL-4 levels were estimated for those mice receiving 100 μg plasmid alone, while it was the lowest in adjuvant alone group (Figure 7).
Figure 7.

Mean ± SD of IFN-γ and IL-4 levels in the experimental groups (picograms per milliliter).
3.2.4. Protoscolex Challenge and Cyst Measurements
In this study, about 8.5 months after the intraperitoneal challenge of BALB/c mice with protoscoleces, the animals were killed and dissected, and the formed cysts were counted and measured with a caliper. The mean cyst dimensions for each group are presented in Table 3. In most of the vaccinated groups, only a small number of hydatid cysts of small sizes were formed, whereas mice in the control group developed numerous cysts of significantly larger sizes (supporting figure (available here)). The highest percentage of protection was estimated for mice that received 100 μg of plasmid + adjuvant, compared to mice that received 50 μg of plasmid + adjuvant and 50 μg of plasmid alone (Table 3).
Table 3.
The number and size of detected hydatid cysts during postmortem abdominal examination per study groups and the calculated protection percentage based on vaccination protocol.
| Variables | Experimental groups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBS | PcDNA | Adjuvant | Plasmid (100 μg) | Plasmid (50 μg) | Plasmid (100 μg) + adjuvant | Plasmid (50 μg) + adjuvant | |
| Free cysts in peritoneal cavity | 70 | 68 | 57 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| Cysts attached to organs | 109 | 95 | 72 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 7 |
| Mice with/without cyst | 4/1 | 5/0 | 4/1 | 2/3 | 3/2 | 1/4 | 2/3 |
| Average size of cyst (cm) | 1.3 | 1.09 | 0.98 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Protection percentagea | 0% | 0% | 28% | 90% | 87% | 96.7% | 94.5% |
aProtection percentage: 1 − (average number of cysts in immunized groups/average number of cysts in control group) × 100.
4. Discussion
CE is a neglected parasitic infection, mostly in countries heavily involved in raising livestock, which inflicts considerable disease burden and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) to the affected people as well as substantial costs to the livestock husbandry [2, 49]. Thus, immunoprophylaxis seems to be a rational preventive strategy for this infection. During last decades, various single- and multiple-component vaccine candidates have been devised and examined against CE infection [14]. The EG-95 gene family encodes a 17 kDa protein containing a secretory signal peptide, a hydrophobic motif, and a fibronectin Type III domain [50]. It is believed that the latter domain permits the oncosphere to connect with different receptor types within host, as likely evidence in the ability of oncosphere to infect different hosts [51]. The P29 protein is a common protoscolex antigen, being absent in the adult worms [52]; it has been shown to possess in the host–parasite interactions and seem to be a good candidate for diagnostic and/or vaccination purposes [21, 53]. Another protoscolex protein, GST, is known as a potent immunomodulatory, favoring parasite persistence within the host tissues [54]. By the advent of recent millennium, a novel branch of bioinformatics emerged, called immunoinformatics, directed towards utilization of web-based and/or standalone tools for the prediction of B- and T-cell-specific immunodominant components of a given antigenic protein, that is, epitopes, and subsequent engineering and construction of multiepitope vaccine candidates against the respective pathogens. This approach may actually overcome some of the shortcomings of the traditional vaccine design, regarding experimental costs and being time-consuming [28]. The current investigation was done to design a potential vaccine candidate using a plasmid encoding E. granulosus Eg95-1 to EG95-6, P29, and GST and evaluated its protective efficacy against hydatid disease in BALB/c mice.
At the first step, we performed epitope analysis using the IEDB web server for each selected E. granulosus s.l. protein (EG-95, GST, and P29); based on the lower percentile ranks (higher affinity for mouse MHC binding), six HTL epitopes and GST complete gene were selected. The final vaccine candidate designed using these epitopes possessed 338 residues. A good vaccine candidate should be highly antigenic, while nonallergenic in nature [55], which was the case for our designed model. Also, based on the ProtParam server output, the designed vaccine had a 37.49 MW, being a likely immunogen (proteins over 5–10 kDa are potential immunogens), and it was a stable molecule (instability index: 32.36) with high thermotolerant ability (aliphatic index: 90.68) and high interactions with the surrounding water milieu (GRAVY: −0.177). Finally, this multiepitope protein was sent for the production of a DNA-based vaccine (in pcDNA 3.1 vector), and its in vivo efficacy as formulated with or without IL-12, as a genetic adjuvant, was demonstrated in BALB/c mice.
Immunity against CE involves both pre- and postformation of hydatid cysts. Initially, levels of IgG antibodies are increased 2 weeks (in mice) or 11 weeks (in sheep) upon protoscolex or parasite egg challenge [56, 57]. Such antioncospheral antibodies play a significant role in parasite killing and protection of the host against echinococcosis [58]. In chronic infection courses, the levels of IgG, IgM, and IgG are increased. Cell-mediated immunity, also, is stimulated in the initial infection phase, which increases as the infection progresses [59–61]. Notably, both T-helper 1 (Th1)-type (IFN-γ and IL-12) and Th2-type (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10) responses are observed in CE infection, probably being associated with the type and the volume of the released antigens [62]. It is known that IgE and IgG4 responses are elicited by IL-4, while IFN-γ and eosinophilia are stimulated through IL-3 and IL-5 [63, 64]. Progressive growth of a hydatid cyst or protection of the host against it is directly associated with the predominance of a given Th response [65]. The production of IgG2 is related to the IFN-γ-mediated B-cell activation, while other antibody classes are impacted by IL-4 and IL-5 cytokines [66]. Altogether, Th1-type responses favor host protection against hydatid cyst growth and this should be considered in vaccine design studies against CE. The results of BALB/c mouse immunization using our designed multiepitope vaccine showed that the specific IgG levels significantly increased in the vaccinated mice, in comparison with control groups (p < 0.05), being consistent with previous studies using vaccine candidates against echinococcosis [20, 47, 67, 68]. The plasmid vaccine elicited both Th1/Th2 responses, with the predominance of IgG2a (Th1-type), rather than IgG1 (Th2-type) responses, causing hydatid cyst elimination in the vaccinated groups. Also, the elevated rate of IgG2a and IgG1 in all vaccinated groups was shown to have statistically significant difference with control groups (p < 0.05).
In this study, also, the bias in cellular immunity towards Th1 or Th2 was measured in splenic lymphocytes using ELISA method. The average levels of IFN-γ in the vaccinated groups were reported to be 3108 (100 μg plasmid), 1860 (50 μg plasmid), 3959 (100 μg plasmid + adjuvant), and 2882 (50 μg plasmid + adjuvant) pg/mL, showing statistically significant difference with control groups (p < 0.05). It is, also, noteworthy that the mean IL-4 levels in 100 μg plasmid (631.1 pg/mL), 50 μg plasmid (502 pg/mL), 100 μg plasmid + adjuvant (564.7 pg/mL), and 50 μg plasmid + adjuvant (489 pg/mL) groups differed significantly with those in control groups. Of note, the levels of IFN-γ and IL-4 in adjuvant alone group (622.7 vs. 97.33 pg/mL) was relatively higher and lower, respectively, than those in controls, which may result from the nature of IL-12 genetic adjuvant, causing the IFN-γ upsurge, while reducing IL-4 by itself. It is said that genetic adjuvants can efficiently promote the immune induction by DNA vaccines, improve the antigen uptake by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and prevent from enzymatic degradation of the vaccine candidate [13, 69, 70].
5. Conclusion
The dog tapeworm, E. granulosus s.l., poses a significant threat to the human and livestock populations by inducing hydatid cysts. Therefore, vaccination approaches are necessary to prevent this parasitic infection. The study at hand entailed the rational design of a multiepitope vaccine using EG-951-6, P29, and GST proteins of E. granulosus s.l., and its efficacy was examined in two experimental doses (50 and 100 μg) combined with IL-12 genetic adjuvant and alone in BALB/c mice against CE infection. The mean levels of IFN-γ and IgG2a, as representatives of Th1-type immunity, were substantially higher in vaccinated than control groups. This was evidenced by no hydatid cyst formation or the growth of few, small-sized cysts in the vaccinated BALB/c mice and highlights the adequate immunogenic potential of this vaccine candidate. It is recommended to examine the vaccine candidate efficacy against different parasite genotypes, and employ different doses formulated with other potent genetic adjuvants.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all staff of the Department of Parasitology of Tarbiat Modares University.
Data Availability Statement
The entire required data are available and recorded in the format of text we have attached as supporting information files (supporting data).
Ethics Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines for medical research and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University (Code IR.MODARES.REC.1400.302).
Disclosure
This article is part of a PhD thesis of Medical Parasitology.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This research received financial support from Tarbiat Modares University (Grant No. Med80971).
Supporting Information
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section. Supporting figure: It shows experimental mice in different treatment groups. Figures A, B, and C show mice from control groups that received PBS or empty pcDNA vector. In contrast, Figures D, E, and F show mice belonging to the experimental vaccinated groups that received the multiepitope DNA vaccine construct.
References
- 1.Shams M., Khazaei S., Naserifar R., et al. Global distribution of Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in domestic and wild canids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitology . 2022;149(9):1147–1159. doi: 10.1017/S0031182022000658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Agudelo Higuita N. I., Brunetti E., McCloskey C. Cystic echinococcosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 2016;54(3):518–523. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02420-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khan A., Ahmed H., Khan H., et al. Cystic echinococcosis in Pakistan: a review of reported cases, diagnosis, and management. Acta Tropica . 2020;212 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105709.105709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hajimohammadi B., Dalimi A., Eslami G., et al. Occurrence and genetic characterization of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato from domestic animals in Central Iran. BMC Veterinary Research . 2022;18(1):p. 22. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-03131-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wen H., Vuitton L., Tuxun T., et al. Echinococcosis: advances in the 21st century. Clinical Microbiology Reviews . 2019;32(2):p. e00075. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00075-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Borhani M., Fathi S., Lahmar S., Ahmed H., Abdulhameed M. F., Fasihi H. M. Cystic echinococcosis in the Eastern Mediterranean region: neglected and prevailing! PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases . 2020;14(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008114.e0008114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Larrieu E., Gavidia C. M., Lightowlers M. W. Control of cystic echinococcosis: background and prospects. Zoonoses and Public Health . 2019;66(8):889–899. doi: 10.1111/zph.12649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Possenti A. Potential risk factors associated with human cystic echinococcosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases . 2016;10(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005114.e0005114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moro P., Schantz P. M. Cystic echinococcosis in the Americas. Parasitology International . 2006;55:S181–S186. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2005.11.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vuitton D. A., McManus D. P., Rogan M. T., et al. International consensus on terminology to be used in the field of echinococcoses. Parasite . 2020;27:p. 41. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2020024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khademvatan S., Majidiani H., Foroutan M., Tappeh K. H., Aryamand S., Khalkhali H. Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in Iran: a systematic review. Journal of Helminthology . 2019;93(2):131–138. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X18000275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Budke C. M., Carabin H., Ndimubanzi P. C., et al. A systematic review of the literature on cystic echinococcosis frequency worldwide and its associated clinical manifestations. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene . 2013;88(6):1011–1027. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pourseif M. M., Moghaddam G., Saeedi N., Barzegari A., Dehghani J., Omidi Y. Current status and future prospective of vaccine development against Echinococcus granulosus. Biologicals . 2018;51:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Anvari D., Rezaei F., Ashouri A., et al. Current situation and future prospects of Echinococcus granulosus vaccine candidates: a systematic review. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases . 2021;68(3):1080–1096. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nourmohammadi H., Javanmardi E., Shams M., et al. Multi-epitope vaccine against cystic echinococcosis using immunodominant epitopes from EgA31 and EgG1Y162 antigens. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked . 2020;21 doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100464.100464 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gauci C., Heath D., Chow C., Lightowlers M. W. Hydatid disease: vaccinology and development of the EG95 recombinant vaccine. Expert Review of Vaccines . 2005;4(1):103–112. doi: 10.1586/14760584.4.1.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lightowlers M., Heath D. Immunity and vaccine control of Echinococcus granulosus infection in animal intermediate hosts. Parassitologia . 2004;46(1–2):27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Larrieu E., Mujica G., Araya D., et al. Pilot field trial of the EG95 vaccine against ovine cystic echinococcosis in Rio Negro, Argentina: 8 years of work. Acta Tropica . 2019;191:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lightowlers M., Jensen O., Fernandez E., et al. Vaccination trials in Australia and Argentina confirm the effectiveness of the EG95 hydatid vaccine in sheep. International Journal for Parasitology . 1999;29(4):531–534. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00003-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gharibi Z., Rahdar M., Pirestani M., Tavalla M., Tabandeh M.-R. The immunization of protoscolices P29 DNA vaccine on experimental cystic echinococosis in balb/c mice. Acta Parasitologica . 2021;66:1114–1121. doi: 10.1007/s11686-021-00367-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang H., Li Z., Gao F., et al. Immunoprotection of recombinant Eg. P29 against Echinococcus granulosus in sheep. Veterinary Research Communications . 2016;40(2):73–79. doi: 10.1007/s11259-016-9656-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Al-Sakee H. M. Experimental trial with glutathione S transferase as vaccine candidate against hydatid disease. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences . 2010;14(1 Special):134–143. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhu M. Mechanism of protective immunity by vaccination with recombinant Echinococcus granulosus glutathione S-transferase (Chinese strain) in mice. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine . 2015;10(3):1127–1132. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chow C., Gauci C. G., Vural G., et al. Echinococcus granulosus: variability of the host-protective EG95 vaccine antigen in G6 and G7 genotypic variants. Experimental Parasitology . 2008;119(4):499–505. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Khazaei S., Dalimi A., Pirestani M., Ghafarifar F. In silico analysis of a 29 kDa Echinococcus granulosus protoscolex protein (P29) as a vaccine candidate against cystic echinococcosis. Archives of Razi Institute . 2023;78(1):p. 323. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.359082.2367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alvarez Rojas C., Gauci C., Lightowlers M. Antigenic differences between the EG95‐related proteins from Echinococcus granulosus G1 and G6 genotypes:implications for vaccination. Parasite Immunology . 2013;35(2):99–102. doi: 10.1111/pim.12009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shams M., Javanmardi E., Nosrati M. C., et al. Bioinformatics features and immunogenic epitopes of Echinococcus granulosus myophilin as a promising target for vaccination against cystic echinococcosis. Infection, Genetics and Evolution . 2021;89 doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104714.104714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Parvizpour S., Pourseif M. M., Razmara J., Rafi M. A., Omidi Y. Epitope-based vaccine design: a comprehensive overview of bioinformatics approaches. Drug Discovery Today . 2020;25(6):1034–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Benson D. A., Cavanaugh M., Clark K., et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research . 2018;46(D1):D41–D47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen J., Liu H., Yang J., Chou K. C. Prediction of linear B-cell epitopes using amino acid pair antigenicity scale. Amino Acids . 2007;33(3):423–428. doi: 10.1007/s00726-006-0485-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mahdevar E., Kefayat A., Safavi A., et al. Immunoprotective effect of an in silico designed multiepitope cancer vaccine with BORIS cancer-testis antigen target in a murine mammary carcinoma model. Scientific Reports . 2021;11(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01770-w.23121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mahdevar E., Safavi A., Abiri A., et al. Exploring the cancer-testis antigen BORIS to design a novel multi-epitope vaccine against breast cancer based on immunoinformatics approaches. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics . 2022;40(14):6363–6380. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2021.1883111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gasteiger E., Hoogland C., Gattiker A., et al. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: Walker J. M., editor. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook . Humana Press; 2005. (Springer Protocols Handbooks). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gupta R., Jung E., Brunak S. Prediction of N-glycosylation Sites in Human Proteins . DTU Bioinformatics; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kiemer L., Bendtsen J. D., Blom N. J. B. NetAcet: prediction of N-terminal acetylation sites. Bioinformatics . 2005;21(7):1269–1270. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Blom N., Sicheritz-Pontén T., Gupta R., Gammeltoft S., Brunak S. J. P. Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics . 2004;4(6):1633–1649. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Doytchinova I. A., Flower D. R. VaxiJen: a server for prediction of protective antigens, tumour antigens and subunit vaccines. BMC Bioinformatics . 2007;8:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Magnan C. N., Zeller M., Kayala M. A., et al. High-throughput prediction of protein antigenicity using protein microarray data. Bioinformatics . 2010;26(23):2936–2943. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dimitrov I., Flower D. R., Doytchinova I. AllerTOP-a server for in silico prediction of allergens. BMC Bioinformatics . 2013;14(S6) doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-S6-S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hebditch M., Carballo-Amador M. A., Charonis S., Curtis R., Warwicker J. J. B. Protein–Sol: a web tool for predicting protein solubility from sequence. Bioinformatics . 2017;33(19):3098–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Garnier J., Gibrat J.-F., Robson B. Methods in Enzymology . Vol. 266. Elsevier; 1996. [32] GOR method for predicting protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence; pp. 540–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kiefer F., Arnold K., Künzli M., Bordoli L., Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Research . 2009;37(Supplement 1):D387–D392. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Laskowski R. A., MacArthur M. W., Moss D. S., Thornton J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. Journal of Applied Crystallography . 1993;26(2):283–291. doi: 10.1107/S0021889892009944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Grote A., Hiller K., Scheer M., et al. JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host. 2005;33:W526–W531. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Puigbò P., Bravo I. G., Garcia-Vallvé S. E-CAI: a novel server to estimate an expected value of Codon Adaptation Index (eCAI) BMC Bioinformatics . 2008;9(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Coligan J. E. J. Short Protocols in Protein Science: A Compendium of Methods from Current Protocols in Protein Science . J. Wiley; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pirestani M., Dalimi A., Sarvi S., Khoramabadi N. Evaluation of immunogenicity of novel isoform of EG95 (EG95-5G1) from Echinococcus granulosus in BALB/C mice. Iranian Journal of Parasitology . 2014;9(4):p. 491. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shahabinejad P., Shahriarirad R., Omidian M., Ghorbani F., Barazesh A., Sarkari B. Diagnostic performance of Echinococcus granulosus protoscolices antigens in the serodiagnosis of human cystic echinococcosis. Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry . 2020;41(5):833–840. doi: 10.1080/15321819.2020.1781653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kargar S., Dalimi A., Eslami G., et al. Cystic echinococcosis in Central Iran: G1 and G6 genotypes in patients. Surgical Infections . 2022;23(5):451–457. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Haag K. L., Gottstein B., Ayala F. J. The EG95 antigen of Echinococcus spp. contains positively selected amino acids, which may influence host specificity and vaccine efficacy. PLoS One . 2009;4(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005362.e5362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bork P., Doolittle R. F. Fibronectin type III modules in the receptor phosphatase CD45 and tapeworm antigens. Protein Science: A Publication of the Protein Society . 1993;2(7):1185–1187. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nouir N. B., Gianinazzi C., Gorcii M., et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of recombinant Echinococcus granulosus P29 protein (recP29) and its assessment for the post-surgical serological follow-up of human cystic echinococcosis in young patients. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene . 2009;103(4):355–364. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shi Z., Wang Y., Li Z., et al. Cloning, expression, and protective immunity in mice of a gene encoding the diagnostic antigen P-29 of Echinococcus granulosus. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin . 2009;41(1):79–85. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmn009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Harnett W. Parasite modulation of the immune response. Parasite Immunology . 2005;27(10–11):357–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2005.00802.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Majidiani H., Dalimi A., Ghaffarifar F., Pirestani M. Multi-epitope vaccine expressed in Leishmania tarentolae confers protective immunity to Toxoplasma gondii in BALB/c mice. Microbial Pathogenesis . 2021;155 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104925.104925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yong W., Heath D., Van Knapen F. Comparison of cestode antigens in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus, Taenia hydatigena and T ovis infections in sheep. Research in Veterinary Science . 1984;36(1):24–31. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)31996-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang W., You H., Li J., et al. Immunoglobulin profiles in a murine intermediate host model of resistance for Echinococcus granulosus infection. Parasite Immunology . 2003;25(3):161–168. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.2003.00622.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dempster R., Harrison G., Berridge M., Heath D. Echinococcus granulosus: use of an intermediate host mouse model to evaluate sources of protective antigens and a role for antibody in the immune response. International Journal for Parasitology . 1992;22(4):435–441. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(92)90144-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Craig P. Detection of specific circulating antigen, immune complexes and antibodies in human hydatidosis from Turkana (Kenya) and Great Britain, by enzyme-immunoassay. Parasite Immunology . 1986;8(2):171–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1986.tb00843.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Daeki A., Craig P., Shambesh M. IgG-subclass antibody responses and the natural history of hepatic cystic echinococcosis in asymptomatic patients. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology . 2000;94(4):319–328. doi: 10.1080/00034983.2000.11813546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Khabiri A., Bagheri F., Assmar M., Siavashi M. Analysis of specific IgE and IgG subclass antibodies for diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasite Immunology . 2006;28(8):357–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2006.00837.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mezioug D., Touil-Boukoffa C. Cytokine profile in human hydatidosis: possible role in the immunosurveillance of patients infected with Echinococcus granulosus. Parasite . 2009;16(1):57–64. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2009161057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jenne L., Kilwinski J., Scheffold W., Kern P. IL-5 expressed by CD4+ lymphocytes from Echinococcus multilocularis-infected patients. Clinical & Experimental Immunology . 1997;109(1):90–97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1997.4031299.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rigano R., Profumo E., Di Felice O., Ortona E., Teggi A., Siracusano A. In vitro production of cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from hydatid patients. Clinical & Experimental Immunology . 1995;99(3):433–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1995.tb05569.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Díaz Á. Immunology of cystic echinococcosis (hydatid disease) British Medical Bulletin . 2017;124(1):121–133. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldx033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rigano R., Profumo E., Bruschi F., et al. Modulation of human immune response by Echinococcus granulosus antigen B and its possible role in evading host defenses. Infection and Immunity . 2001;69(1):288–296. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.1.288-296.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Azizi H., Kazemi B., Bandehpour M., et al. Modulation of the immune response to DNA Vaccine encoding gene of 8-kda subunit of Echinococcus granulosus antigen B using murine interleukin-12 plasmid in BALB/c mice. Iranian Journal of Parasitology . 2016;11(4):480–489. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zhang F., Li S., Zhu Y., et al. Immunization of mice with egG1Y162-1/2 provides protection against Echinococcus granulosus infection in BALB/c mice. Molecular Immunology . 2018;94:183–189. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li L., Petrovsky N. Molecular mechanisms for enhanced DNA vaccine immunogenicity. Expert Review of Vaccines . 2016;15(3):313–329. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2016.1124762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Saade F., Petrovsky N. Technologies for enhanced efficacy of DNA vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines . 2012;11(2):189–209. doi: 10.1586/erv.11.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Khazaei S., Dalimi A., Pirestani M., Ghafarifar F. Biochemical properties and immunogenic epitopes of echinococcus granulosus glutathione S-transferase as a vaccine target: in-silico study. Iranian Journal of Parasitology . 2024;19(1):p. 61. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v19i1.15205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Foroutan M., Ghaffarifar F., Sharifi Z., Dalimi A. Vaccination with a novel multi-epitope ROP8 DNA vaccine against acute Toxoplasma gondii infection induces strong B and T cell responses in mice. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases . 2020;69 doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101413.101413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section. Supporting figure: It shows experimental mice in different treatment groups. Figures A, B, and C show mice from control groups that received PBS or empty pcDNA vector. In contrast, Figures D, E, and F show mice belonging to the experimental vaccinated groups that received the multiepitope DNA vaccine construct.
Data Availability Statement
The entire required data are available and recorded in the format of text we have attached as supporting information files (supporting data).
