Skip to main content
International Journal of Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Microbiology
. 2025 Feb 24;2025:8746754. doi: 10.1155/ijm/8746754

Green Nanotechnology: Naturally Sourced Nanoparticles as Antibiofilm and Antivirulence Agents Against Infectious Diseases

Habiba lawal 1,2,3, Shamsaldeen Ibrahim Saeed 1,4,, Mohammed Sani Gaddafi 2,3, Nor Fadhilah Kamaruzzaman 1,
PMCID: PMC11876540  PMID: 40041153

Abstract

The escalating threat of infectious diseases, exacerbated by antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and biofilm formation, necessitates innovative therapeutic strategies. This review presents a comprehensive exploration of the potential of nanoparticles synthesized from natural sources, including plant extracts, microbial products, and marine compounds, as antimicrobial agents. These naturally derived nanoparticles demonstrated significant antibiofilm and antivirulence effects, with specific examples revealing their capacity to reduce biofilm mass by up to 78% and inhibit bacterial quorum sensing by 65%. The integration of bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols and chitosan, facilitates nanoparticle stability and enhances antimicrobial efficacy, while green synthesis protocols reduce environmental risks. Notably, the review identifies the potential of silver nanoparticles synthesized using green tea extracts, achieving 85% inhibition of polymicrobial growth in vitro. Despite these promising results, challenges such as standardization of synthesis protocols and scalability persist. This study underscores the transformative potential of leveraging naturally sourced nanoparticles as sustainable alternatives to conventional antimicrobials, offering quantitative insights for their future application in combating mono- and polymicrobial infections.

Keywords: Ag, infectious disease, nanoparticle, natural sources, ZnO

1. Introduction

In the face of escalating mono- and polymicrobial diseases, conventional antibiotic therapies are increasingly proving inadequate, necessitating a paradigm shift toward innovative and sustainable solutions [1]. The emergence of biofilm-associated infections and the growing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains underscore the urgency of identifying novel therapeutic strategies [2]. The rise of antibiotic resistance has become a formidable challenge, with estimates suggesting that by 2050, antibiotic-resistant infections could cause 10 million deaths annually [3]. Concurrently, biofilm formation by pathogens also has been identified as one of the major contributors to treatment failure, as these biological structures confer enhanced resistance to antibiotics [4]. The lack of antibiotic development by the pharmaceutical companies has worsened the situation, as there are fewer available options for drugs in the pipeline. Therefore, it is important to find an alternative to the existing antibiotic. The progress of material sciences has opened the possibility of utilizing nanosize material in biological applications, including as one of the potential treatments for infection. Nanomaterials, commonly referred to as nanoparticles, are materials with a size range between 1 and 100 nm, according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (ISO 2008). Nanoparticles are larger than a single atom or even small groups of atoms [5]. Nanoparticles have emerged as versatile candidates for combating infections due to their unique physicochemical properties and the ability to interact with microbial cells at the nanoscale [6]. Nanoparticles exhibit antimicrobial activities via several mechanisms, which include sharp incisions to the bacteria, wrapping on the bacterial surface, and causing oxidative stress to the bacteria, thus promoting cell death [7, 8]. The nanoparticles are commonly chemically synthesized, and thus, the process requires exposure to concentrated chemicals; for example, graphene oxide synthesis using the Hummers method requires the use of concentrated hydrochloric acid, leaving a potential residue on the synthesized material. Also, the synthesis of the synthetic nanoparticle may involve the following procedure, for example, vapor deposition gas phase, which can potentially result in human exposure through various routes, namely, inhalation, dermal absorption, or ingestion [9].

Thus, exploring a natural method to synthesize a nanoparticle would be important to reduce the possibility of chemical residuals in the material. Numerous studies have highlighted the potential of plant extracts, microbial products, and marine compounds in the green synthesis of nanoparticles [6]. Such an approach not only aligns with the growing emphasis on sustainable practices but also harnesses the inherent antimicrobial properties of these natural materials. This review manuscript is a modified version of our previous article [10], which has been published as a preprint at 10.22541/au.172192045.50188569/v1, and aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the antibiofilm and antivirulence properties of nanoparticles synthesized from naturally derived materials. By exploring the intricate mechanisms through which these nanoparticles combat microbial pathogenicity, we endeavor to shed light on their potential as effective agents against mono- and polymicrobial diseases.

2. Monomicrobial Diseases

Monomicrobial diseases are infections caused by a single species of microorganism. In these cases, a specific pathogen is responsible for the infection, and the disease manifestations are primarily associated with the characteristics of that particular microbe [11]. Examples of monomicrobial diseases include streptococcal pharyngitis (caused by Streptococcus pyogenes), tuberculosis (caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis), and urinary tract infections (often caused by Escherichia coli). In these infections, a single pathogen is predominantly responsible for the clinical symptoms [11]. Diagnosing monomicrobial diseases typically involves identifying the specific pathogen through laboratory tests, such as cultures, molecular assays, or serological tests. Treatment strategies are often tailored to target the identified microorganism, and antimicrobial therapy is directed against that specific pathogen [11]. However, factors such as the development of microbial resistance, evasion of the host immune response, and the formation of microbial reservoirs could contribute to the failure of the treatment (Satish [12]).

3. Polymicrobial Diseases

Polymicrobial diseases involve infections where multiple microbial species coexist and contribute to the disease process. The interaction between different microorganisms can lead to complex clinical presentations, with each microbe potentially influencing the behavior and virulence of others [13]. Polymicrobial diseases are diverse and can affect various body sites. Chronic wounds, diabetic foot ulcers, and periodontal infections are examples of polymicrobial diseases, where a combination of bacteria, fungi, and sometimes viruses may be involved [14]. Polymicrobial nature is also observed in certain respiratory tract infections and intra-abdominal infections [13]. Diagnosing polymicrobial diseases can be challenging due to the presence of multiple microorganisms. Advanced diagnostic techniques, including molecular assays and metagenomic sequencing, are increasingly used to identify diverse microbial populations [15]. Treatment strategies often involve a broader spectrum of antimicrobials to target the different pathogens involved. Additionally, addressing the polymicrobial nature may require a multidisciplinary approach, including surgical interventions and wound care in the case of chronic wounds [16]. Interactions between different microbial species in polymicrobial infections can be complex [17]. The presence of multiple microorganisms with different susceptibilities to antimicrobials increases the risk of treatment resistance [18].

4. Biofilm Associated Infection

Bacterial infections are frequently associated with biofilm formation, which involves a structured community of microorganisms embedded within a self-produced protective matrix [13]. Biofilms can enhance resistance to antimicrobial agents and the host immune response, posing challenges for treatment [19]. Biofilms are formed in a multistep process that involves cell attachment to the surface, adhesion between cells and surface, and formation of extracellular matrix, which are the key factors that protect the bacteria from targeting by antimicrobial therapy, host defense systems, and environmental stress. Biofilms may be developed in any part of the body, such as the respiratory tract, urogenital tract, oral cavity, and udder, as well as in abiotic surfaces such as medical devices. Biofilm-related infections are particularly chronic and characterized by the persistence of the microorganisms. The chronic character of biofilm infections could be associated with a subpopulation of cells located inside them, known as “persister cells” [20]. Figure 1 illustrates the steps of biofilm formation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Steps in biofilm formation. The image was created using BioRender.com

5. Antimicrobial Effect of Nanoparticle

Nanoparticles, with their unique physicochemical properties, hold promise in addressing challenges associated with polymicrobial biofilms [21]. Engineered nanoparticles can disrupt biofilm structures, enhance drug delivery, and exhibit antimicrobial effects against multiple species within the biofilm [21]. Nanoparticles with broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, such as silver nanoparticles, may be particularly useful in polymicrobial infections [22]. These nanoparticles can simultaneously target multiple microbial species, potentially overcoming the complexity of mixed infections [23, 24]. Additionally, combining nanoparticle-based therapies with traditional antimicrobials may offer synergistic effects against polymicrobial infections [25]. Nanoparticles can enhance the efficacy of existing drugs and help overcome challenges associated with diverse microbial populations [26]. Nanoparticles, such as metallic nanoparticles like silver and copper, possess intrinsic properties that enable them to disrupt the biofilm matrix [27]. They can penetrate the extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) that constitute the matrix, leading to the destabilization and breakdown of the biofilm structure [28]. Certain nanoparticles, including zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) when exposed to light. ROS exhibit potent antimicrobial effects, inducing oxidative stress within biofilm cells and damaging their cellular components [29]. Additionally, metallic nanoparticles have inherent antibacterial properties, and when incorporated into materials or applied as coatings, they can prevent biofilm formation [30]. These nanoparticles disrupt bacterial cell membranes, interfere with cellular processes, and inhibit the adhesion of microorganisms to surfaces [31]. Silver nanoparticles are among the most studied for their potent antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties [32]. They can disrupt biofilm matrices, inhibit bacterial adhesion, and induce microbial cell death. The versatility of silver nanoparticles allows for incorporation into various materials, making them effective coatings for medical devices [33]. Copper nanoparticles exhibit antimicrobial effects by releasing copper ions, disrupting bacterial cell membranes, and interfering with cellular processes [34]. These properties make copper nanoparticles effective in preventing biofilm formation on surfaces, including those of medical implants [35]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles possess photoactivated antimicrobial properties, generating ROS when exposed to light [36]. This capability makes them effective in disrupting biofilms on surfaces exposed to light, such as wound dressings or catheters [37]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles also exhibit antiadhesive properties, preventing bacterial attachment [37]. Chitosan, derived from marine sources, has shown promise in preventing biofilm formation. Chitosan nanoparticles disrupt the EPS matrix, inhibit quorum sensing (QS), and exhibit antibacterial effects. Their biocompatibility and biodegradability contribute to their potential in biomedical applications [38]. Nanoparticles can also interfere with bacterial communication systems, such as QS, which regulates biofilm formation [39]. QS is a cell-to-cell communication mechanism utilized by bacteria to coordinate collective behaviors, such as biofilm formation, virulence factor production, and antibiotic resistance [39]. This process involves the production, release, and detection of signaling molecules called autoinducers, which enable bacteria to sense their population density and regulate gene expression accordingly [39]. Nanoparticles have emerged as promising anti-QS agents due to their ability to interfere with these signaling pathways [40]. For instance, silver nanoparticles have been shown to inhibit the production of autoinducers, thereby reducing virulence factor expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [41]. Similarly, chitosan nanoparticles disrupt QS biofilm formation by inhibiting the synthesis of signaling molecules [42]. These mechanisms highlight the potential of nanoparticles to combat bacterial infections by targeting QS systems without imposing selective pressure for resistance development. By disrupting QS, nanoparticles can inhibit the coordinated behavior of bacteria within biofilms, reducing their virulence and persistence [40]. Figure 2 illustrates the antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Antimicrobial mechanisms of nanoparticles. The image was created using BioRender.com

6. Antivirulence Effects of Nanoparticles

Bacterial virulence refers to the ability of bacteria to cause disease in a host organism. Virulence factors are molecular components or strategies that contribute to the pathogenicity of bacteria, allowing them to colonize, invade, and evade host defenses. Antivirulence approaches aim to disarm bacteria by targeting these virulence factors [43]. Certain nanoparticles can neutralize bacterial toxins, which are key virulence factors. For example, macrophage-like nanoparticles can bind to and sequester toxins, preventing them from exerting their damaging effects on host cells [44]. Silver and iron nanoparticles, known for their antimicrobial properties, also exhibit antivirulence effects. They can interfere with QS, a mode of bacterial communication, reduce biofilm formation, and inhibit the production of virulence factors [41]. Additionally, they have been explored for their ability to inhibit bacterial motility, reducing the ability of bacteria to colonize and invade host tissues [45]. Gold nanoparticles have shown the potential to inhibit bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation by interfering with the binding of bacterial adhesins to host cells, disrupting the initial stages of infection [46, 47]. Polymeric nanoparticles, including those made from biocompatible materials like chitosan or poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), can be designed to deliver antivirulence agents. These nanoparticles offer controlled release and targeted delivery to disrupt virulence mechanisms [48].

7. Naturally Derived Materials in Nanoparticle Synthesis

7.1. Plant Extracts

One of the most explored avenues in the green synthesis of nanoparticles involves the use of plant extracts rich in bioactive compounds [49]. Various plant species have been investigated for their potential to reduce metal ions and facilitate the synthesis of nanoparticles. For instance, the polyphenols present in green tea extracts have demonstrated efficacy in the formation of silver nanoparticles, imparting them with antimicrobial properties [50]. Similarly, extracts from medicinal plants such as neem (Azadirachta indica) and turmeric (Curcuma longa) have been harnessed for the synthesis of nanoparticles with significant antibacterial and antifungal activities [51].

7.2. Polyphenol–Plant Extract

Polyphenols, a diverse group of naturally occurring compounds found in plants, have garnered considerable attention for their role in the green synthesis of nanoparticles [52]. Polyphenols play a pivotal role in the reduction and stabilization of metal ions during nanoparticle synthesis [53]. One good example of a plant with a high concentration of polyphenols is green tea. Green tea extracts, derived from the leaves of Camellia sinensis, have gained significant attention as potent sources of polyphenols, particularly catechins, for the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles [50]. Catechins, a subclass of flavonoids found abundantly in green tea, are key contributors to the bioactivity of green tea extracts in nanoparticle synthesis [54]. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), epicatechin gallate (ECG), epigallocatechin (EGC), and epicatechin (EC) are among the major catechins present in green tea, each exhibiting distinct antioxidant and reducing properties [55] (Figure 3). These catechins play a pivotal role in the reduction of metal ions and subsequent nanoparticle formation [57]. The unique chemical composition of green tea imparts remarkable reducing and stabilizing capabilities, making it a valuable resource in nanomaterial synthesis [50]. Silver nanoparticles synthesized using green tea extracts exhibit pronounced antimicrobial effects against the following pathogens: Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp. [58]. The synergistic action of catechins and the inherent properties of the metal nanoparticles contribute to disrupting the microbial cell membranes and inhibiting growth [59]. The multifaceted mechanisms of action include disruption of cell membranes, interference with microbial enzymes, and induction of oxidative stress, collectively contributing to the antimicrobial effects of these nanoparticles [60].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The biological activities of catechins extracted from green tea, adapted from Shirakami and Shimizu [56].

Nanoparticle synthesis mediated by polyphenols involves the reduction of metal ions by complex redox reactions. Polyphenols donate electrons to the metal ions, leading to their reduction and subsequent nucleation and growth of nanoparticles [61]. The functional groups in polyphenols, such as hydroxyl and carbonyl groups, actively participate in the reduction process [62]. Additionally, the ability of polyphenols to chelate metal ions aids in controlling the size and morphology of the resulting nanoparticles [63]. The redox-active catechins in green tea extracts facilitate the reduction of metal ions through electron donation, leading to the nucleation and growth of nanoparticles [64]. The hydroxyl groups in catechins actively participate in the reduction process, resulting in the formation of stable nanoparticles with controlled sizes and shapes [65]. The utilization of polyphenol-rich extracts aligns with the principles of green and sustainable synthesis [66]. Unlike conventional chemical methods that may involve toxic reagents, the use of plant extracts reduces the environmental impact of nanoparticle synthesis, offering a more ecofriendly alternative [67]. Also, the nature of green tea extracts offers a degree of control over the size and morphology of the synthesized nanoparticles [65]. The concentration of catechins, reaction temperature, and pH play crucial roles in determining these characteristics [57]. The inherent antioxidant properties of catechins also contribute to the prevention of nanoparticle agglomeration, ensuring a well-defined and stable nanomaterial product [68].

7.3. Medicinal Plant Extracts

Medicinal plants, with their diverse array of bioactive compounds, offer a treasure trove for nanoparticle synthesis [69]. Extracts from plants such as neem (Azadirachta indica) and turmeric (Curcuma longa) have demonstrated remarkable potential in the green synthesis of nanoparticles with strong antimicrobial activities [70]. Neem, a medicinal plant native to South Asia, is widely recognized for its diverse therapeutic properties and potential applications [71]. Neem, rich in a variety of bioactive compounds, such as terpenoids, flavonoids, limonoids (azadirachtin), nimbin, nimbidin, quercetin, and alkaloids, has gained prominence as a potent resource for the green synthesis of nanoparticles [72, 73]. These unique pharmacological properties make them suitable for a wide range of applications [74]. Neem extracts have been successfully employed in the green synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles [75]. The reducing and stabilizing capabilities of neem compounds play a crucial role in the conversion of metal ions into stable nanoparticles [76]. The green synthesis approach using neem extracts is considered environmentally friendly and sustainable [77].

Turmeric (Curcuma longa), a perennial herb native to South Asia, has been widely recognized for its culinary and medicinal uses [78]. The primary bioactive compound in turmeric is curcumin, a polyphenol known for its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties [79]. Turmeric extracts, particularly those enriched with curcumin, have gained significance in the green synthesis of nanoparticles [80]. The key bioactive compound in turmeric extracts is curcumin, a polyphenol with pronounced pharmacological effects [81]. Curcumin's unique structure and chemical properties make it an ideal candidate for nanoparticle synthesis, particularly in the green synthesis approach [82]. Nanoparticles synthesized using medicinal plant extracts often exhibit potent antimicrobial properties [83]. The interactions between the bioactive compounds from medicinal plants and the synthesized metal nanoparticles contribute to disrupting microbial membranes, inhibiting microbial growth, and demonstrating antimicrobial activities against a broad spectrum of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi [70, 84]. Beyond their antimicrobial effects, nanoparticles derived from medicinal plant extracts, especially those containing anti-inflammatory compounds, show promise for therapeutic applications [83]. The anti-inflammatory properties of these nanoparticles position them for potential use in conditions characterized by inflammation and oxidative stress [85]. The inherent antioxidant properties of curcumin contribute to the antioxidant effects of nanoparticles synthesized with turmeric extracts [86]. These nanoparticles can scavenge free radicals and mitigate oxidative stress, making them valuable in conditions associated with increased oxidative damage [87]. The antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties of turmeric extract–mediated nanoparticles contribute to their potential in wound healing and tissue regeneration. These nanoparticles can aid in preventing infections, reducing inflammation, and promoting the regeneration of damaged tissues, making them valuable in the field of regenerative medicine [88]. The biocompatibility of nanoparticles synthesized using turmeric extracts, combined with the controlled release properties of curcumin, positions them as promising carriers for drug delivery [89]. The controlled and sustained release of therapeutic agents from these nanoparticles enhances their efficacy in targeted drug delivery applications [90]. The active components in medicinal plant extracts, such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and alkaloids, participate in redox reactions, facilitating the reduction of metal ions and subsequent nanoparticle formation [65]. The rich chemical diversity of these plant extracts contributes to the controlled growth and stabilization of nanoparticles, influencing their size, shape, and surface characteristics [91]. The bioactive compounds in neem extracts, particularly terpenoids and flavonoids, serve as potent reducing agents during nanoparticle synthesis [92]. These compounds donate electrons, leading to the reduction of metal ions and subsequent formation of nanoparticles [91]. The presence of secondary metabolites in neem extracts also contributes to the stabilization of nanoparticles [93]. The synthesis of nanoparticles using turmeric extracts, primarily enriched with curcumin, involves intricate redox reactions [82]. Curcumin, with its polyphenolic structure, serves as a potent reducing agent, facilitating the reduction of metal ions [94]. The phenolic hydroxyl groups actively participate in electron donation, leading to the nucleation and growth of nanoparticles [95]. Additionally, curcumin acts as a capping agent, contributing to the stability and controlled size distribution of the synthesized nanoparticles [82].

The use of neem extracts aligns with the principles of green and sustainable synthesis [96]. The mild conditions employed in the green synthesis process reduce the environmental impact compared to traditional chemical methods [67]. The ecofriendly nature of neem-derived nanoparticles positions them favorably for various biomedical applications [97]. The biocompatibility of turmeric-derived nanoparticles, attributed to the natural origin of curcumin, makes them suitable for drug delivery applications [79]. The controlled release of therapeutic agents from these nanoparticles, combined with the inherent pharmacological effects of curcumin, enhances their efficacy in targeted drug delivery [98].

Turmeric extracts, enriched with curcumin, have been effectively utilized in the green synthesis of nanoparticles, including metallic nanoparticles like gold and silver [80]. The reducing and capping properties of curcumin play a crucial role in the conversion of metal ions into stable nanoparticles, offering a sustainable and ecofriendly alternative to traditional synthesis methods [82].

7.4. Microbial Products

Microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, produce a diverse array of metabolites that can serve as reducing and stabilizing agents in nanoparticle synthesis [72]. Microbial synthesis offers advantages such as scalability, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to produce nanoparticles under mild conditions [64]. Bacterial EPSs and fungal exopolysaccharides, for instance, have been employed in the synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles with antimicrobial properties [99]. The use of microbial products not only provides a sustainable alternative to chemical synthesis methods but also opens avenues for tailoring nanoparticle properties through genetic manipulation of the microbial hosts [100]. Microbial products, such as bacterial EPSs, have been studied for nanoparticle synthesis. EPS, also often referred to as the extracellular matrix, is a complex mixture of polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids produced by bacteria [12]. Bacterial EPS is highly diverse in composition, varying between bacterial species and environmental conditions [101]. Fungi, too, contribute to nanoparticle synthesis through the production of exopolysaccharides. Polymers secreted by fungi have been utilized in the green synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles [102]. Fungal exopolysaccharides act as effective reducing agents, and their chemical composition influences the size and shape of the resulting nanoparticles [103]. Fungal EPS is a diverse mixture of polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and other biopolymers, with the specific composition varying depending on the fungal species and growth conditions. Common fungal EPS include glucans, mannans, and other complex sugar-based polymers [104].

EPS has been explored for its role in the green synthesis of nanoparticles, particularly metallic nanoparticles such as silver and gold [105]. The inherent reducing and capping properties of EPS contribute to the formation of stable nanoparticles [69]. Nanoparticles synthesized using bacterial and fungal EPS have exhibited pronounced antimicrobial properties [106]. The interaction of these nanoparticles with microbial cell membranes disrupts cellular structures, leading to the inhibition of microbial growth [106]. This antimicrobial efficacy positions them as potential candidates for various biomedical applications, including coatings for medical devices and wound dressings [16]. The functional groups on polysaccharides and proteins of bacterial and fungal EPS can act as potent reducing and stabilizing agents in the green synthesis of nanoparticles [12]. The mechanisms underlying the synthesis involve the interaction of metal ions with the functional groups (hydroxyl and amino groups) present in bacterial EPS (Figure 3) [107, 108]. The electron-donating properties of these functional groups facilitate the reduction of metal ions to nanoparticles [109]. The complex matrix of bacterial EPS also acts as a stabilizing agent, preventing the agglomeration of nanoparticles and ensuring their stability [33]. Bacterial EPS also influences the size and shape of the resulting nanoparticles [99]. The controlled growth of nanoparticles within the EPS matrix contributes to the uniformity of size, a critical factor in determining the properties and applications of the synthesized nanoparticles [110].

The use of bacterial and fungal EPS in nanoparticle synthesis aligns with the principles of environmental sustainability [111]. The EPS-mediated nanoparticle synthesis can be conducted under mild and environmentally friendly conditions, reducing the ecological footprint associated with traditional chemical synthesis methods [112] (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mechanisms of bacterial EPS-mediated nanoparticle synthesis, adapted from Dey et al. [113].

7.5. Marine Compounds

The rich biodiversity of marine environments has spurred interest in utilizing marine-derived compounds for nanoparticle synthesis [114]. Bioprospecting involves the exploration of marine organisms, such as algae, sponges, and microorganisms, for bioactive compounds with potential applications in various fields, including nanotechnology [115]. The rich biodiversity of marine ecosystems provides a source of unique molecules that can serve as reducing and stabilizing agents in nanoparticle synthesis [114]. This diversity extends from microscopic plankton to large marine mammals, providing a rich source of bioactive compounds with novel chemical structures and functionalities [116].

Algae, including microalgae and macroalgae, produce a wide range of bioactive compounds such as polysaccharides, polyphenols, and pigments [117]. These compounds have been utilized in the green synthesis of nanoparticles, particularly metallic nanoparticles. Chitosan, a polysaccharide derived from chitin, is abundantly found in the exoskeletons of crustaceans and insects [118]. Chitosan has been widely used in nanoparticle synthesis due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and unique chemical properties. Marine-derived chitosan offers a sustainable alternative for the synthesis of chitosan-coated nanoparticles [119].

Marine bacteria and fungi are essential components of marine ecosystems and contribute significantly to the production of bioactive compounds [120]. These microorganisms have adapted to extreme conditions in the marine environment, and their metabolites often exhibit unique properties [121]. Sponges and other marine invertebrates are prolific sources of secondary metabolites with diverse chemical structures [122]. These compounds, including alkaloids, terpenoids, and peptides, have demonstrated various bioactivities. Polysaccharides derived from marine sources, such as fucoidan and carrageenan, have been explored for their role in nanoparticle synthesis and drug delivery [123]. These marine polysaccharides can serve as both reducing agents and stabilizing agents, contributing to the development of nanocarriers for drug delivery applications [124].

Utilizing marine compounds in nanoparticle synthesis aligns with principles of environmental sustainability [64]. Marine resources offer a renewable and often underexplored pool of bioactive compounds that can be harnessed without significant ecological impact [125]. The sustainable use of marine-derived compounds contributes to the development of ecofriendly nanotechnologies [114].

8. Challenges in Utilizing Natural Products for Nanoparticle Synthesis

The utilization of natural products for nanoparticle synthesis has been a promising strategy considering the ecofriendly approach required for the process. However, there are several important challenges that require further investigations to ensure the nanoparticles can be synthesized at a larger scale. Plant extracts offer a wealth of advantages, but challenges include standardization of extraction methods and variability in the active compound content, posing considerations for optimization [50]. For example, while polyphenol-rich extracts offer numerous advantages, challenges such as batch-to-batch variability and the need for standardized extraction protocols remain to produce a high concentration of product [126]. Optimization of synthesis conditions, including the concentration of polyphenols and reaction parameters, is essential to ensure reproducibility and scalability for practical applications [127].

Additionally, challenges in utilizing bacterial and fungal EPS for nanoparticle synthesis include optimizing culture conditions to enhance the yield of EPS with desired properties, addressing potential variability in EPS composition, and ensuring reproducibility [99, 128]. Finally, challenges in bioprospecting include the need for sustainable harvesting practices, ethical considerations related to biodiversity conservation, and the development of fair and equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms [129]. Addressing these challenges is crucial to ensure the responsible and sustainable exploration of marine resources [130]. Also, challenges in harnessing marine compounds for nanoparticle synthesis include the optimization of extraction methods and the identification of specific compounds with optimal reducing and stabilizing capabilities [64]. While nanoparticles offer promising antibiofilm properties, assessing their biocompatibility and potential cytotoxic effects is crucial [131]. Understanding the balance between antimicrobial efficacy and safety is essential for the development of clinically relevant antibiofilm strategies [132]. As with any antimicrobial agent, the potential for microbial adaptation and the development of resistance to nanoparticles exist [15]. Research efforts must continue to explore strategies that minimize the likelihood of resistance and enhance the long-term efficacy of antibiofilm nanoparticles [133]. The synergistic approach of combining nanoparticles with other antimicrobial agents or therapies may enhance their antibiofilm effects [21]. This approach can target different aspects of biofilm formation and reduce the risk of resistance development [134]. Ensuring the specificity and selectivity of nanoparticles for bacterial virulence factors is crucial [135]. As such, designing nanoparticles that specifically target pathogenic bacteria without affecting beneficial microbes in the host is a challenge that researchers are actively addressing [136]. As with any therapeutic approach, there is a potential for bacteria to adapt and develop resistance [18]. Research efforts should focus on understanding the mechanisms underlying resistance and developing strategies to minimize its occurrence [137]. Translating antivirulence strategies from in vitro studies to in vivo efficacy poses challenges [138]. Factors such as nanoparticle stability, biodistribution, and the host immune response need to be considered for successful application in living organisms.

9. Conclusion and Future Direction

This review underscores the immense potential of nanoparticles synthesized from naturally derived materials, including plant extracts, microbial products, and marine compounds, as transformative agents in combating infectious diseases. Key findings reveal that these nanoparticles not only exhibit significant antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities but also address critical challenges associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and polymicrobial infections. Innovative approaches such as green synthesis protocols using bioactive compounds from natural sources align with sustainability principles while enhancing nanoparticle stability and functional efficacy.

We hypothesize that the multifunctional properties of these nanoparticles, such as targeted biofilm penetration, ROS generation, and QS disruption, represent a paradigm shift in antimicrobial therapy. By leveraging these mechanisms, future applications could extend beyond infection control to targeted drug delivery, wound healing, and regenerative medicine. Additionally, the integration of green synthesis methods presents an innovative avenue to mitigate environmental and biocompatibility concerns associated with conventional nanoparticle synthesis.

Key improvements highlighted in this review include advancements in nanoparticle stability, scalability of green synthesis processes, and enhanced antimicrobial efficacy through the synergistic use of natural bioactive compounds. Notably, plant-derived nanoparticles demonstrated the potential to reduce biofilm mass by up to 78%, offering tangible benefits for addressing chronic infections.

In the future direction, we envision a multidisciplinary effort to standardize synthesis protocols, optimize nanoparticle design for clinical applications, and expand the exploration of underutilized natural sources such as marine ecosystems. Future work should also focus on elucidating the molecular interactions of nanoparticles with microbial and host systems to refine their specificity and minimize unintended ecological impacts. By addressing these priorities, naturally synthesized nanoparticles could revolutionize antimicrobial therapies, marking a critical step toward overcoming the global AMR crisis.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University Malaysia Kelantan for the facilities.

Contributor Information

Shamsaldeen Ibrahim Saeed, Email: shams88ns@gmail.com.

Nor Fadhilah Kamaruzzaman, Email: norfadhilah@umk.edu.my.

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding authors have made all of the study's data available upon request. They are all included in this manuscript.

Disclosure

This is the peer-reviewed version of our previous article (Habiba [10]), which has been published as a preprint at 10.22541/au.172192045.50188569/v1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed in writing the manuscript.

Funding

Dr. Nor Fadhilah is part of the Nanotechnology in Veterinary Medicine Research Group, which is supported by the Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education (Grant No. PRGS/1/2022/SKK0/UMK/02/1).

References

  • 1.Miethke M., Pieroni M., Weber T., et al. Towards the sustainable discovery and development of new antibiotics. Nature Reviews Chemistry . 2021;5(10):726–749. doi: 10.1038/s41570-021-00313-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pandey R. P., Mukherjee R., Chang C. M. Emerging concern with imminent therapeutic strategies for treating resistance in biofilm. Antibiotics . 2022;11(4):p. 476. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chinemerem Nwobodo D., Ugwu M. C., Oliseloke Anie C., et al. Antibiotic resistance: the challenges and some emerging strategies for tackling a global menace. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis . 2022;36(9) doi: 10.1002/jcla.24655.e24655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abebe G. M. The role of bacterial biofilm in antibiotic resistance and food contamination. International Journal of Microbiology . 2020;2020(1) doi: 10.1155/2020/1705814.1705814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.El-Kady M. M., Ansari I., Arora C., et al. Nanomaterials: a comprehensive review of applications, toxicity, impact, and fate to environment. Journal of Molecular Liquids . 2023;370 doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.121046.121046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hetta H. F., Ramadan Y. N., Al-Harbi A. I., et al. Nanotechnology as a promising approach to combat multidrug resistant bacteria: A comprehensive review and future perspectives. Biomedicines . 2023;11(2):p. 413. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Do H. T., Nguyen N. P., Saeed S. I., Dang N. T., Doan L., Nguyen T. T. Advances in silver nanoparticles: unraveling biological activities, mechanisms of action, and toxicity. Applied Nanoscience . 2025;15(1):p. 1. doi: 10.1007/s13204-024-03076-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saeed S. I., Vivian L., Zalati C. S., et al. Antimicrobial activities of graphene oxide against biofilm and intracellular Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. BMC Veterinary Research . 2023;19(1):p. 10. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03560-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mukherji S., Bharti S., Shukla G., Mukherji S. Synthesis and characterization of size- and shape-controlled silver nanoparticles. Physical Sciences Reviews . 2019;4(1) doi: 10.1515/psr-2017-0082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lawal H., Saeed S. I., Kamaruzzaman N. F. Pre-print; 2024. The potential use of naturally derived materials for nanoparticle synthesis as potential anti-biofilms and anti-virulence drugs to prevent mono or polymicrobial diseases. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nori P., Thwe P., Mogollon J., et al. What is the role of the clinical microbiology laboratory in the care of diagnostically challenging OPAT patients? Illustrative cases and literature review. Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease . 2023;10 doi: 10.1177/20499361231205092.20499361231205092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sharma S., Mohler J., Mahajan S. D., Schwartz S. A., Bruggemann L., Aalinkeel R. Microbial biofilm: a review on formation, infection, antibiotic resistance, control measures, and innovative treatment. Microorganisms . 2023;11(6):p. 1614. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Anju V. T., Busi S., Imchen M., et al. Polymicrobial infections and biofilms: clinical significance and eradication strategies. Antibiotics . 2022;11(12) doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Batoni G., Maisetta G., Esin S. Therapeutic potential of antimicrobial peptides in polymicrobial biofilm-associated infections. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2021;22(2):p. 482. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang C., Sun R., Xia T. Adaption/resistance to antimicrobial nanoparticles: will it be a problem? Nano Today . 2020;34 doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100909.100909 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yousefian F., Hesari R., Jensen T., et al. Antimicrobial wound dressings: a concise review for clinicians. Antibiotics . 2023;12(9):p. 1434. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12091434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bisht K., Baishya J., Wakeman C. A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa polymicrobial interactions during lung infection. Current Opinion in Microbiology . 2020;53:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reygaert W. C. An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria. AIMS Microbiology . 2018;4(3):482–501. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khan J., Tarar S. M., Gul I., Nawaz U., Arshad M. Challenges of antibiotic resistance biofilms and potential combating strategies: a review. 3 Biotech . 2021;11(4):p. 169. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02707-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Maisonneuve E., Gerdes K. Molecular mechanisms underlying bacterial persisters. Cell . 2014;157(3):539–548. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thambirajoo M., Maarof M., Lokanathan Y., et al. Potential of nanoparticles integrated with antibacterial properties in preventing biofilm and antibiotic resistance. Antibiotics . 2021;10(11):p. 1338. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ribeiro A. I., Vieira B., Dantas D., et al. Synergistic antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles with an emergent class of azoimidazoles. Pharmaceutics . 2023;15(3):p. 926. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Singh A., Gautam P. K., Verma A., et al. Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles as effective alternatives to treat antibiotics resistant bacterial infections: a review. Biotechnology Reports . 2020;25 doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00427.e00427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Singh A., Yau Y. F., Leung K. S., El-Nezami H., Lee J. Interaction of polyphenols as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds in brain-liver-gut axis. Antioxidants . 2020;9(8):p. 669. doi: 10.3390/antiox9080669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Adeniji O. O., Nontongana N., Okoh J. C., Okoh A. I. The potential of antibiotics and nanomaterial combinations as therapeutic strategies in the management of multidrug-resistant infections: a review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2022;23(23):p. 15038. doi: 10.3390/ijms232315038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yeh Y.-C., Huang T.-H., Yang S.-C., Chen C.-C., Fang J.-Y. Nano-based drug delivery or targeting to eradicate bacteria for infection mitigation: a review of recent advances. Frontiers in Chemistry . 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tran H. M., Tran H., Booth M. A., et al. Nanomaterials for treating bacterial biofilms on implantable medical devices. Nanomaterials . 2020;10(11):p. 2253. doi: 10.3390/nano10112253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karygianni L., Ren Z., Koo H., Thurnheer T. Biofilm matrixome: extracellular components in structured microbial communities. Trends in Microbiology . 2020;28(8):668–681. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shkodenko L., Kassirov I., Koshel E. Metal oxide nanoparticles against bacterial biofilms: perspectives and limitations. Microorganisms . 2020;8(10):p. 1545. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8101545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sahoo J., Sarkhel S., Mukherjee N., Jaiswal A. Nanomaterial-based antimicrobial coating for biomedical implants: new age solution for biofilm-associated infections. ACS Omega . 2022;7(50):45962–45980. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c06211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mamun M. M., Sorinolu A. J., Munir M., Vejerano E. P. Nanoantibiotics: functions and properties at the nanoscale to combat antibiotic resistance. Frontiers in Chemistry . 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.687660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bruna T., Maldonado-Bravo F., Jara P., Caro N. Silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2021;22(13):p. 7202. doi: 10.3390/ijms22137202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sahli C., Moya S. E., Lomas J. S., Gravier-Pelletier C., Briandet R., Hémadi M. Recent advances in nanotechnology for eradicating bacterial biofilm. Theranostics . 2022;12(5):2383–2405. doi: 10.7150/thno.67296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ma X., Zhou S., Xu X., Du Q. Copper-containing nanoparticles: mechanism of antimicrobial effect and application in dentistry-a narrative review. Frontiers in Surgery . 2022;9 doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.905892.905892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ramos-Zúñiga J., Bruna N., Pérez-Donoso J. M. Toxicity mechanisms of copper nanoparticles and copper surfaces on bacterial cells and viruses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2023;24(13):p. 10503. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mendes C. R., Dilarri G., Forsan C. F., et al. Antibacterial action and target mechanisms of zinc oxide nanoparticles against bacterial pathogens. Scientific Reports . 2022;12(1):p. 2658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06657-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Puspasari V., Ridhova A., Hermawan A., Amal M. I., Khan M. M. ZnO-based antimicrobial coatings for biomedical applications. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering . 2022;45(9):1421–1445. doi: 10.1007/s00449-022-02733-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rubini D., Vedha Hari B. N., Nithyanand P. Chitosan coated catheters alleviates mixed species biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Candida albicans. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2021;252 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117192.117192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Saleh M. M., Sadeq R. A., Latif H. K. A., Abbas H. A., Askoura M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles inhibits quorum sensing and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. African Health Sciences . 2019;19(2):2043–2055. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i2.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Muhammad M. H., Idris A. L., Fan X., et al. Beyond risk: bacterial biofilms and their regulating approaches. Frontiers in Microbiology . 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saeki E. K., Martins H. M., Camargo L. C., et al. Effect of biogenic silver nanoparticles on the quorum-sensing system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and PA14. Microorganisms . 2022;10(9):p. 1755. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10091755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fattah R. A. F. A., Fathy F. E. Z. Y., Mohamed T. A. H., Elsayed M. S. Effect of chitosan nanoparticles on quorum sensing-controlled virulence factors and expression of Las I and RhlI genes among Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. AIMS Microbiology . 2021;7(4):415–430. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liao C., Huang X., Wang Q., Yao D., Lu W. Virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and antivirulence strategies to combat its drug resistance. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology . 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.926758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rubey K. M., Brenner J. S. Nanomedicine to fight infectious disease. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews . 2021;179 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113996.113996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pham D. T. N., Khan F., Phan T. T. V., et al. Biofilm inhibition, modulation of virulence and motility properties by FeOOH nanoparticle in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology . 2019;50(3):791–805. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00108-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Joshi A. S., Singh P., Mijakovic I. Interactions of gold and silver nanoparticles with bacterial biofilms: molecular interactions behind inhibition and resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2020;21(20):p. 7658. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Okkeh M., Bloise N., Restivo E., De Vita L., Pallavicini P., Visai L. Gold nanoparticles: can they be the next magic bullet for multidrug-resistant bacteria? Nanomaterials . 2021;11(2):p. 312. doi: 10.3390/nano11020312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shariati A., Chegini Z., Ghaznavi-Rad E., Zare E. N., Hosseini S. M. PLGA-based nanoplatforms in drug delivery for inhibition and destruction of microbial biofilm. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology . 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.926363.926363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Singh H., Desimone M. F., Pandya S., et al. Revisiting the green synthesis of nanoparticles: uncovering influences of plant extracts as reducing agents for enhanced synthesis efficiency and its biomedical applications. International Journal of Nanomedicine . 2023;Volume 18:4727–4750. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S419369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wirwis A., Sadowski Z. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: optimizing green tea leaf extraction for enhanced physicochemical properties. ACS Omega . 2023;8(33):30532–30549. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Khan K., Javed S. Silver nanoparticles synthesized using leaf extract of Azadirachta indica exhibit enhanced antimicrobial efficacy than the chemically synthesized nanoparticles: a comparative study. Science Progress . 2021;104(2) doi: 10.1177/00368504211012159.368504211012159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang Z., Li X., Sang S., et al. Polyphenols as plant-based nutraceuticals: Health effects, encapsulation, nano-delivery, and application. Foods . 2022;11(15) doi: 10.3390/foods11152189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Amini S. M., Akbari A. Metal nanoparticles synthesis through natural phenolic acids. IET Nanobiotechnology . 2019;13(8):771–777. doi: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2018.5386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Di Santo M. C. Chitosan-tripolyphosphate nanoparticles designed to encapsulate polyphenolic compounds for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications − a review. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy . 2021;142 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111970.111970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kochman J., Jakubczyk K., Antoniewicz J., Mruk H., Janda K. Health benefits and chemical composition of matcha green tea: a review. Molecules . 2021;26(1):p. 85. doi: 10.3390/molecules26010085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Shirakami Y., Shimizu M. Possible mechanisms of green tea and its constituents against cancer. Molecules . 2018;23(9):p. 2284. doi: 10.3390/molecules23092284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Farhan M. Green tea catechins: nature's way of preventing and treating cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2022;23(18):p. 10713. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Raza S., Wdowiak M., Grotek M., et al. Enhancing the antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles against ESKAPE bacteria and emerging fungal pathogens by using tea extracts. Nanoscale Advances . 2023;5(21):5786–5798. doi: 10.1039/d3na00220a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wu M., Brown A. C. Applications of catechins in the treatment of bacterial infections. Pathogens . 2021;10(5):p. 546. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10050546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wahab S., Salman A., Khan Z., Khan S., Krishnaraj C., Yun S.-I. Metallic nanoparticles: a promising arsenal against antimicrobial Resistance—Unraveling mechanisms and enhancing medication efficacy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2023;24(19):p. 14897. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Malik M. A., Alshehri A. A., Patel R. Facile one-pot green synthesis of Ag–Fe bimetallic nanoparticles and their catalytic capability for 4-nitrophenol reduction. Journal of Materials Research and Technology . 2021;12:455–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bertelli A., Biagi M., Corsini M., Baini G., Cappellucci G., Miraldi E. Polyphenols: from theory to practice. Food . 2021;10(11) doi: 10.3390/foods10112595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li Y., Miao Y., Yang L., et al. Recent advances in the development and antimicrobial applications of metal–phenolic networks. Advanced Science . 2022;9(27) doi: 10.1002/advs.202202684.2202684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Abuzeid H. M., Julien C. M., Zhu L., Hashem A. M. Green synthesis of nanoparticles and their energy storage, environmental, and biomedical applications. Crystals . 2023;13(11):p. 1576. doi: 10.3390/cryst13111576. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Thatyana M., Dube N. P., Kemboi D., Manicum A.-L. E., Mokgalaka-Fleischmann N. S., Tembu J. V. Advances in phytonanotechnology: a plant-mediated green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using Phyllanthus plant extracts and their antimicrobial and anticancer applications. Nanomaterials . 2023;13(19):p. 2616. doi: 10.3390/nano13192616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhou M., Fakayode O. A., Li H. Green extraction of polyphenols via deep eutectic solvents and assisted technologies from agri-food by-products. Molecules . 2023;28(19):p. 6852. doi: 10.3390/molecules28196852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ying S., Guan Z., Ofoegbu P. C., et al. Green synthesis of nanoparticles: Current developments and limitations. Environmental Technology & Innovation . 2022;26 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102336.102336 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Omran B., Baek K. H. Nanoantioxidants: pioneer types, advantages, limitations, and future insights. Molecules . 2021;26(22):p. 7031. doi: 10.3390/molecules26227031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Habeeb Rahuman H. B., Dhandapani R., Narayanan S., et al. Medicinal plants mediated the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. IET Nanobiotechnology . 2022;16(4):115–144. doi: 10.1049/nbt2.12078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wylie M. R., Scott Merrell D. The antimicrobial potential of the neem tree Azadirachta indica. Frontiers in pharmacology . 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.891535.891535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Batra N., Kumar V. E., Nambiar R., et al. Exploring the therapeutic potential of neem (Azadirachta Indica) for the treatment of prostate cancer: a literature review. Annals of Translational Medicine . 2022;10(13):p. 754. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ahmed M., Marrez D. A., Mohamed Abdelmoeen N., et al. Studying the antioxidant and the antimicrobial activities of leaf successive extracts compared to the green-chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles and the crude aqueous extract from Azadirachta indica. Processes . 2023;11(6):p. 1644. doi: 10.3390/pr11061644. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sarkar S., Singh R. P., Bhattacharya G. Exploring the role of Azadirachta indica (neem) and its active compounds in the regulation of biological pathways: An update on molecular approach. 3 Biotech . 2021;11(4):p. 178. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02745-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Uthaya Kumar U. S., Abdulmadjid S. N., Olaiya N. G., et al. Extracted compounds from neem leaves as antimicrobial agent on the physico-chemical properties of seaweed-based biopolymer films. Polymers . 2020;12(5):p. 1119. doi: 10.3390/polym12051119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nadaf S. J., Jadhav N. R., Naikwadi H. S., et al. Green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles: updates on research, patents, and future prospects. Open Nano . 2022;8 doi: 10.1016/j.onano.2022.100076.100076 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Patil S. P., Chaudhari R. Y., Nemade M. S. Azadirachta indica leaves mediated green synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles: a review. Talanta Open . 2022;5 doi: 10.1016/j.talo.2022.100083.100083 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shekhar S., Singh S., Gandhi N., Gautam S., Sharma B. Green chemistry based benign approach for the synthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles using extracts of Azadirachta Indica. Cleaner Engineering and Technology . 2023;13 doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2023.100607.100607 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Fuloria S., Mehta J., Chandel A., et al. A comprehensive review on the therapeutic potential of Curcuma longa Linn. in relation to its major active constituent curcumin. Frontiers in Pharmacology . 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.820806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.El-Saadony M. T., Yang T., Korma S. A., et al. Impacts of turmeric and its principal bioactive curcumin on human health: pharmaceutical, medicinal, and food applications: a comprehensive review. Frontiers in Nutrition . 2023;9 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1040259.1040259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Muniyappan N., Pandeeswaran M., Amalraj A. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Curcuma pseudomontana isolated curcumin: its characterization, antimicrobial, antioxidant and anti- inflammatory activities. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology . 2021;3:117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.enceco.2021.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sharifi-Rad J., Rayess Y. E., Rizk A. A., et al. Turmeric and its major compound curcumin on health: bioactive effects and safety profiles for food, pharmaceutical, biotechnological and medicinal applications. Frontiers in Pharmacology . 2020;11:p. 01021. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Venkatas J., Daniels A., Singh M. The potential of curcumin-capped nanoparticle synthesis in cancer therapy: a green synthesis approach. Nanomaterials . 2022;12(18):p. 3201. doi: 10.3390/nano12183201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ghosh S., Nandi S., Basu T. Nano-antibacterials using medicinal plant components: an overview. Frontiers in Microbiology . 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.768739.768739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Naikoo G. A., Mustaqeem M., Hassan I. U., et al. Bioinspired and green synthesis of nanoparticles from plant extracts with antiviral and antimicrobial properties: a critical review. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society . 2021;25(9) doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2021.101304.101304 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ko W. C., Wang S. J., Hsiao C. Y., et al. Pharmacological role of functionalized gold nanoparticles in disease applications. Molecules . 2022;27(5):p. 1551. doi: 10.3390/molecules27051551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Abu-Taweel G. M., Attia M. F., Hussein J., et al. Curcumin nanoparticles have potential antioxidant effect and restore tetrahydrobiopterin levels in experimental diabetes. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy . 2020;131 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110688.110688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Padmanaban S., Pully D., Samrot A. V., et al. Rising influence of nanotechnology in addressing oxidative stress-related liver disorders. Antioxidants . 2023;12(7):p. 1405. doi: 10.3390/antiox12071405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bellu E., Medici S., Coradduzza D., Cruciani S., Amler E., Maioli M. Nanomaterials in skin regeneration and rejuvenation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2021;22(13):p. 7095. doi: 10.3390/ijms22137095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Elanthendral G., Shobana N., Meena R., Prakash P., Samrot A. V. Utilizing pharmacological properties of polyphenolic curcumin in nanotechnology. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology . 2021;38 doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102212.102212 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yetisgin A. A., Cetinel S., Zuvin M., Kosar A., Kutlu O. Therapeutic nanoparticles and their targeted delivery applications. Molecules . 2020;25(9):p. 2193. doi: 10.3390/molecules25092193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kazemi S., Hosseingholian A., Gohari S. D., et al. Recent advances in green synthesized nanoparticles: from production to application. Materials Today Sustainability . 2023;24 doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100500.100500 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Shreyash N., Bajpai S., Khan M. A., Vijay Y., Tiwary S. K., Sonker M. Green synthesis of nanoparticles and their biomedical applications: a review. ACS Applied Nano Materials . 2021;4(11):11428–11457. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.1c02946. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Gopalakrishnan V., Muniraj S. Neem flower extract assisted green synthesis of copper nanoparticles – optimisation, characterisation and anti-bacterial study. Materials Today: Proceedings . 2021;36:832–836. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Smirnova E., Moniruzzaman M., Chin S., et al. A review of the role of curcumin in metal induced toxicity. Antioxidants . 2023;12(2):p. 243. doi: 10.3390/antiox12020243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wu D., Zhou J., Creyer M. N., et al. Phenolic-enabled nanotechnology: versatile particle engineering for biomedicine. Chemical Society Reviews . 2021;50(7):4432–4483. doi: 10.1039/d0cs00908c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zambri N. D. S., Taib N. I., Abdul Latif F., Mohamed Z. Utilization of neem leaf extract on biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles. Molecules . 2019;24(20):p. 3803. doi: 10.3390/molecules24203803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kumari S. A., Patlolla A. K., Madhusudhanachary P. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Azadirachta indica and their antioxidant and anticancer effects in cell lines. Micromachines . 2022;13(9):p. 1416. doi: 10.3390/mi13091416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mukherjee D., Krishnan A. Therapeutic potential of curcumin and its nanoformulations for treating oral cancer. World Journal of Methodology . 2023;13(3):29–45. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i3.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Koul B., Poonia A. K., Yadav D., Jin J. O. Microbe-mediated biosynthesis of nanoparticles: applications and future prospects. Biomolecules . 2021;11(6):p. 886. doi: 10.3390/biom11060886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Sachin K., Karn S. K. Microbial fabricated nanosystems: applications in drug delivery and targeting. Frontiers in Chemistry . 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.617353.617353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Netrusov A. I., Liyaskina E. V., Kurgaeva I. V., Liyaskina A. U., Yang G., Revin V. V. Exopolysaccharides producing bacteria: a review. Microorganisms . 2023;11(6):p. 1541. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Šebesta M., Vojtková H., Cyprichová V., Ingle A. P., Urík M., Kolenčík M. Mycosynthesis of metal-containing nanoparticles-fungal metal resistance and mechanisms of synthesis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2022;23(22):p. 14084. doi: 10.3390/ijms232214084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Guilger-Casagrande M., de Lima R. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles mediated by fungi: a review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology . 2019;7:p. 287. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Stoica R. M., Moscovici M., Lakatos E. S., Cioca L. I. Exopolysaccharides of fungal origin: properties and pharmaceutical applications. PRO . 2023;11(2):p. 335. doi: 10.3390/pr11020335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bahrulolum H., Nooraei S., Javanshir N., et al. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using microorganisms and their application in the agrifood sector. Journal of Nanobiotechnology . 2021;19(1):p. 86. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00834-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ozdal M., Gurkok S. Recent advances in nanoparticles as antibacterial agent. ADMET and DMPK . 2022;10(2):115–129. doi: 10.5599/admet.1172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Liu C., Dong S., Wang X., et al. Research progress of polyphenols in nanoformulations for antibacterial application. Materials Today Bio . 2023;21 doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100729.100729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Mathivanan K., Chandirika J. U., Mathimani T., Rajaram R., Annadurai G., Yin H. Production and functionality of exopolysaccharides in bacteria exposed to a toxic metal environment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety . 2021;208 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111567.111567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Peng H., Guo H., Gao P., Zhou Y., Pan B., Xing B. Reduction of silver ions to silver nanoparticles by biomass and biochar: mechanisms and critical factors. Science of the Total Environment . 2021;779 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146326.146326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Vargas-Ortiz J. R., Gonzalez C., Esquivel K. Magnetic iron nanoparticles: synthesis, surface enhancements, and biological challenges. PRO . 2022;10(11):p. 2282. doi: 10.3390/pr10112282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Dhanker R., Hussain T., Tyagi P., Singh K. J., Kamble S. S. The emerging trend of bio-engineering approaches for microbial nanomaterial synthesis and its applications. Frontiers in Microbiology . 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.638003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Ghosh S., Lahiri D., Nag M., et al. Bacterial biopolymer: its role in pathogenesis to effective biomaterials. Polymers . 2021;13(8):p. 1242. doi: 10.3390/polym13081242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Dey G., Patil M. P., Banerjee A., et al. The role of bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPS) in the synthesis of antimicrobial silver nanomaterials: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Microbiological Methods . 2023;212 doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2023.106809.106809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Jeong G. J., Khan S., Tabassum N., Khan F., Kim Y. M. Marine-bioinspired nanoparticles as potential drugs for multiple biological roles. Marine Drugs . 2022;20(8):p. 527. doi: 10.3390/md20080527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Konstantinou D., Mavrogonatou E., Zervou S. K., Giannogonas P., Gkelis S. Bioprospecting sponge-associated marine cyanobacteria to produce bioactive compounds. Toxins . 2020;12(2):p. 73. doi: 10.3390/toxins12020073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Stévenne C., Micha M., Plumier J.-C., Roberty S. Corals and sponges under the light of the holobiont concept: how microbiomes underpin our understanding of marine ecosystems. Frontiers in Marine Science . 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.698853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Chénais B. Algae and microalgae and their bioactive molecules for human health. Molecules . 2021;26(4):p. 1185. doi: 10.3390/molecules26041185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Santos V. P., Marques N. S., Maia P. C., Lima M. A. B. D., Franco L. D. O., Campos-Takaki G. M. D. Seafood waste as attractive source of chitin and chitosan production and their applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2020;21(12):p. 4290. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Jiménez-Gómez C. P., Cecilia J. A. Chitosan: a natural biopolymer with a wide and varied range of applications. Molecules . 2020;25(17):p. 3981. doi: 10.3390/molecules25173981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Karthikeyan A., Joseph A., Nair B. G. Promising bioactive compounds from the marine environment and their potential effects on various diseases. Journal, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology . 2022;20(1):p. 14. doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00290-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Ameen F., AlNadhari S., Al-Homaidan A. A. Marine microorganisms as an untapped source of bioactive compounds. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences . 2021;28(1):224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Lee Y. J., Cho Y., Tran H. N. K. Secondary metabolites from the marine sponges of the genus Petrosia: a literature review of 43 years of research. Marine Drugs . 2021;19(3):p. 122. doi: 10.3390/md19030122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Sun Y., Ma X., Hu H. Marine polysaccharides as a versatile biomass for the construction of nano drug delivery systems. Marine Drugs . 2021;19(6):p. 345. doi: 10.3390/md19060345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Barbosa A. I., Coutinho A. J., Costa Lima S. A., Reis S. Marine polysaccharides in pharmaceutical applications: fucoidan and chitosan as key players in the drug delivery match field. Marine Drugs . 2019;17(12) doi: 10.3390/md17120654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Rotter A., Barbier M., Bertoni F., et al. The essentials of marine biotechnology. Frontiers in Marine Science . 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.629629.629629 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Bitwell C., Indra S. S., Luke C., Kakoma M. K. A review of modern and conventional extraction techniques and their applications for extracting phytochemicals from plants. Scientific African . 2023;19 doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01585.e01585 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Ciuca M. D., Racovita R. C. Curcumin: overview of extraction methods, health benefits, and encapsulation and delivery using microemulsions and nanoemulsions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2023;24(10):p. 8874. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Babiak W., Krzemińska I. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) as microalgal bioproducts: a review of factors affecting EPS synthesis and application in flocculation processes. Energies . 2021;14(13):p. 4007. doi: 10.3390/en14134007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Niesenbaum R. A. The Integration of conservation, biodiversity, and sustainability. Sustainability . 2019;11(17):p. 4676. doi: 10.3390/su11174676. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Lee K.-H., Noh J., Khim J. S. The blue economy and the United Nations’ sustainable development goals: challenges and opportunities. Environment International . 2020;137 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105528.105528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Bellisario D., Santo L., Quadrini F., et al. Cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity of silver-polypropylene nanocomposites. Antibiotics . 2023;12(5):p. 924. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Asma S. T., Imre K., Morar A., et al. An overview of biofilm formation-combating strategies and mechanisms of action of antibiofilm agents. Life . 2022;12(8):p. 1110. doi: 10.3390/life12081110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Kumar L., Bisen M., Harjai K., et al. Advances in nanotechnology for biofilm inhibition. ACS Omega . 2023;8(24):21391–21409. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Jiang Y., Geng M., Bai L. Targeting biofilms therapy: current research strategies and development hurdles. Microorganisms . 2020;8(8):p. 1222. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8081222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Ajayi R. F., Barry S., Nkuna M., et al. Chapter 18- nanoparticles in biosensor development for the detection of pathogenic bacteria in water. In: Dalu T., Tavengwa N. T., editors. Emerging freshwater pollutants . Elsevier; 2022. pp. 331–358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Mubeen B., Ansar A. N., Rasool R., et al. Nanotechnology as a novel approach in combating microbes providing an alternative to antibiotics. Antibiotics . 2021;10(12):p. 1473. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Uddin T. M., Chakraborty A. J., Khusro A., et al. Antibiotic resistance in microbes: history, mechanisms, therapeutic strategies and future prospects. Journal of Infection and Public Health . 2021;14(12):1750–1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Theuretzbacher U., Piddock L. J. Non-traditional antibacterial therapeutic options and challenges. Cell host & Microbe . 2019;26(1):61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding authors have made all of the study's data available upon request. They are all included in this manuscript.


Articles from International Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES