Skip to main content
International Journal of Health Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Health Sciences
editorial
. 2025 Mar-Apr;19(2):1–3.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for joint disorder detection: Promising advances in diagnostics

Zafar Rasheed 1,*
PMCID: PMC11877054  PMID: 40046794

Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized multiple domains, including healthcare, by enhancing the capabilities of machine learning (ML) models for disease detection and diagnosis. Among these, early joint disease detection has significantly benefited from AI-powered technologies such as deep learning (DL) algorithms, medical image analysis, pattern recognition, and predictive analytics. Joint disorders, such as osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and other inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions, are among the leading causes of disability worldwide. The early diagnosis of these diseases is critical for effective intervention, reducing disease progression, and improving patient outcomes. Traditional diagnostic methods rely heavily on clinical symptoms, imaging techniques, and laboratory tests. However, these approaches often detect diseases at an advanced stage when significant joint damage has already occurred. Recent advances in AI and ML have transformed the field of medical diagnostics, providing early and accurate detection methods for joint disorders. AI-driven diagnostic tools, including ML models, leverage large datasets of medical images, biomarkers, and patient records to identify patterns and predict disease onset with high precision. This editorial article explores the current state of AI in joint disease diagnostics, discusses the benefits and challenges of these technologies, and highlights future directions in AI-driven healthcare innovations.

Several types of ML models contribute to early joint disease detection such as supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, and reinforcement learning models.[1-3] The supervised learning models are trained on labeled datasets, such as radiographic images of arthritic joints, to classify disease presence and severity. Examples include support vector machines, random forests, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs).[4] Whereas unsupervised learning models are used for clustering and anomaly detection, these models identify hidden patterns in unstructured patient data, which may indicate early disease onset.[5] The semi-supervised learning models are a mix of supervised and unsupervised learning models, which have also been applied in health and other sectors.[3,6] Other than these, the reinforcement learning models used the algorithms continuously improve their diagnostic accuracy by learning from new patient cases and clinical feedback.[7] DL, a subset of ML, utilizes artificial neural networks to process large datasets with high-dimensional features. It has become a cornerstone in medical image analysis, aiding in automatic segmentation, classification, and disease prognosis.[8] DL models, particularly CNNs, have been employed to analyze X-rays, magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs), and computer tomography scans, providing automated assessments of joint damage and inflammation.[8-10] DL models segment cartilaginous tissues and synovial fluid, helping assess joint damage. CNNs classify disease severity based on established radiographic grading systems, such as the Kellgren–Lawrence scale for OA.[11] While CNNs excel at image analysis, recurrent neural networks and long short-term memory (LSTM) process sequential medical data, such as patient history and time-series joint degradation. LSTM networks predict the likelihood of disease progression based on past medical records.[10-12]

AI-driven ML models have been developed to aid clinicians in diagnosing and predicting the progression of joint diseases with high accuracy.[13-15] AI models analyze long-term patient data to recommend personalized therapeutic interventions. Medical image analysis leverages AI models to identify patterns in radiological images for early detection of joint disorders.[13-15] AI models enhance image preprocessing, including noise reduction and image enhancement which improves clarity in X-rays and MRI scans for better diagnostic accuracy.[16,17] Moreover, pattern recognition involves AI-driven algorithms that learn to differentiate between healthy and diseased joints using techniques include such as morphological pattern detection, which identifying joint deformities.[18] Whereas, statistical pattern analysis using AI-based models to establish correlations between imaging biomarkers and disease outcomes.[19,20] Predictive analytics in early joint disease diagnosis utilizes AI to analyze historical patient data and forecast disease onset and progression.[21] Risk prediction models with AI assess genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors to estimate disease susceptibility.[22] Electronic Health Records contain vast amounts of patient data, including clinical history, prescriptions, and imaging reports. AI-driven natural language processing algorithms can extract meaningful patterns from these records to predict the likelihood of joint disease development and predictive analytics using AI has shown promising results in identifying high-risk patients for early intervention.[23,24] Interestingly, the advantages of AI-driven diagnostic tool models identify disease markers long before symptom manifest, enabling preventive strategies and timely intervention. Moreover, AI eliminates human errors and inconsistencies in diagnostic interpretations, leading to more reliable outcomes. Further, AI-powered diagnostic tools can be deployed in remote or underserved areas, making quality healthcare accessible to a broader population.[25,26] Not only have these, automating diagnostic processes reduces the burden on healthcare professionals and minimizes diagnostic delays, ultimately lowering healthcare costs.[27] Importantly, AI models can also detect OA-related joint space narrowing and cartilage degradation at an earlier stage than traditional radiological assessments.[17] These networks extract spatial hierarchies of features, enabling automated detection of joint abnormalities patterns.[17,21] Most importantly, Al models analyze large datasets of genetic, proteomic, and metabolic biomarkers to identify predictive signatures for the number of human disorders and most likely to be applied for the detection of joint deformities associated with OA, RA, and other skeletal disorders.[28-30] Despite its potential, AI-driven diagnostics face several challenges, including the need for high-quality annotated datasets to effectively train AI models. In addition, the Clinician’s trust in Al-based ML models has also been a challenge. Most importantly, ensuring the confidentiality of patient data while using AI models remains a critical concern. Other than data privacy and security, implementing AI tools in existing healthcare systems requires significant infrastructure and regulatory approvals. In short, the integration of AI in ML models for early joint disease detection is transforming musculoskeletal healthcare by enabling precise diagnosis, pattern recognition, and predictive analytics. Supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, and reinforcement learning models play distinct roles in improving disease detection accuracy and patient outcomes. While challenges remain, future advancements in AI-driven healthcare promise improved diagnostic capabilities, personalized treatments, and enhanced clinical decision-making in joint disease management.

In conclusion, AI-driven diagnostic tools are transforming the landscape of early disease detection in joint disorders. By leveraging ML models, medical professionals can achieve faster, more accurate, and cost-effective diagnoses. However, overcoming challenges related to data privacy, bias, and clinical integration is crucial for widespread adoption. As AI technologies continue to evolve, their role in personalized medicine and preventive healthcare will become increasingly significant. The future of AI-driven diagnostics in joint disorders is promising. Research efforts are focusing on multimodal AI systems that integrate imaging, biomarker analysis, and clinical history for comprehensive disease detection. In addition, explainable AI models are being developed to provide transparent and interpretable diagnoses, enhancing clinician trust in AI systems.

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Baxter NB, Lin CH, Wallace BI, Chen JS, Kuo CF, Chung KC. Development of a machine learning model to predict the use of surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2024;76:636–43. doi: 10.1002/acr.25287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cui T, Liu R, Jing Y, Fu J, Chen J. Development of machine learning models aiming at knee osteoarthritis diagnosing:An MRI radiomics analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:375. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03837-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Geraldes E. Understanding Types of Machine Learning Models. Clicdata. 2024. [[Last accessed on 2025 Feb 02]]. Available from: https://www.clicdata.com/blog/machine-learning-models-types .
  • 4.Shi Y, Zhou M, Chang C, Jiang P, Wei K, Zhao J, et al. Advancing precision rheumatology:Applications of machine learning for rheumatoid arthritis management. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1409555. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1409555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Demanse D, Saxer F, Lustenberger P, Tankó LB, Nikolaus P, Rasin I, et al. Unsupervised machine-learning algorithms for the identification of clinical phenotypes in the osteoarthritis initiative database. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2023;58:152140. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang Y, Gu X, Hou W, Zhao M, Sun L, Guo C. Dual semi-supervised learning for classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment based on neuropsychological data. Brain Sci. 2023;13:306. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hu M, Zhang J, Matkovic L, Liu T, Yang X. Reinforcement learning in medical image analysis:Concepts, applications, challenges, and future directions. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023;24:e13898. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li M, Jiang Y, Zhang Y, Zhu H. Medical image analysis using deep learning algorithms. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1273253. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1273253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang Y, Liu L, Wang C. Trends in using deep learning algorithms in biomedical prediction systems. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1256351. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1256351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhao X, Wang L, Zhang Y, Han X, Deveci M, Parmar M. A review of convolutional neural networks in computer vision. Artif Intell Rev. 2024;57:99. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mohammed AS, Hasanaath AA, Latif G, Bashar A. knee osteoarthritis detection and severity classification using residual neural networks on preprocessed X-ray images. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13:1380. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alis D, Alis C, Yergin M, Topel C, Asmakutlu O, Bagcilar O, et al. A joint convolutional-recurrent neural network with an attention mechanism for detecting intracranial hemorrhage on noncontrast head CT. Sci Rep. 2022;12:2084. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05872-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hügle M, Omoumi P, Van Laar JM, Boedecker J, Hügle T. Applied machine learning and artificial intelligence in rheumatology. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2020;4:rkaa005. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkaa005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McMaster C, Bird A, Liew DF, Buchanan RR, Owen CE, Chapman WW, et al. Artificial intelligence and deep learning for rheumatologists. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:1893–905. doi: 10.1002/art.42296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lalehzarian SP, Gowd AK, Liu JN. Machine learning in orthopaedic surgery. World J Orthop. 2021;12:685–99. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i9.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Obuchowicz R, Strzelecki M, Piórkowski A. Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in medical imaging and image processing-a review. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16:1870. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ozsari S, Güzel MS, Yılmaz D, Kamburoğlu K. A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence based algorithms regarding temporomandibular joint related diseases. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13:2700. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13162700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Waqar A, Bheel N, Tayeh BA. Modeling the effect of implementation of artificial intelligence powered image analysis and pattern recognition algorithms in concrete industry. Dev Built Environ. 2024;17:100349. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saleh GA, Batouty NM, Gamal A, Elnakib A, Hamdy O, Sharafeldeen A, et al. Impact of imaging biomarkers and AI on breast cancer management:A brief review. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:5216. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Piras A, Corso R, Benfante V, Ali M, Laudicella R, Alongi P, et al. Artificial intelligence and statistical models for the prediction of radiotherapy toxicity in prostate cancer:A systematic review. Appl Sci. 2024;14:10947. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Momtazmanesh S, Nowroozi A, Rezaei N. Artificial intelligence in rheumatoid arthritis:Current status and future perspectives:A state-of-the-art review. Rheumatol Ther. 2022;9:1249–304. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00475-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vyas A, Raman S, Surya J, Sen S, Raman R. The need for artificial intelligence based risk factor analysis for age-related macular degeneration:A review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;13:130. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hossain E, Rana R, Higgins N, Soar J, Barua PD, Pisani AR, et al. natural language processing in electronic health records in relation to healthcare decision-making:A systematic review. Comput Biol Med. 2023;155:106649. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Luz A, Gimah M. AI-Driven Early Detection Systems for Chronic Diseases. [Preprints] 2025:2025012144. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chustecki M. Benefits and Risks of AI in Health Care:Narrative Review. Interact J Med Res. 2024;13:e53616. doi: 10.2196/53616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Umapathy VR, Rajinikanth BS, Samuel Raj RD, Yadav S, Munavarah SA, Anandapandian PA, et al. Perspective of artificial intelligence in disease diagnosis:A review of current and future endeavours in the medical field. Cureus. 2023;15:e45684. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Khanna NN, Maindarkar MA, Viswanathan V, Fernandes JF, Paul S, Bhagawati M, et al. Economics of artificial intelligence in healthcare:Diagnosis vs. treatment. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10:2493. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mann M, Kumar C, Zeng WF, Strauss MT. Artificial intelligence for proteomics and biomarker discovery. Cell Syst. 2021;12:759–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vilhekar RS, Rawekar A. Artificial intelligence in genetics. Cureus. 2024;16:e52035. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barberis E, Khoso S, Sica A, Falasca M, Gennari A, Dondero F, et al. Precision medicine approaches with metabolomics and artificial intelligence. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:11269. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Qassim University

RESOURCES