Abstract
We report the discovery and characterization of bacteriophages ASegato, DejaVu, Judebell, and RicoCaldo, isolated from grass samples collected in Quincy, Massachusetts, using Microbacterium foliorum B-24224 as the isolation host. Based on gene content similarity, these phages are assigned to actinobacteriophage clusters ED2, ED1, EG, and EK2 respectively.
Figure 1. Representative negative-staining (1 % uranyl acetate) transmission electron micrographs of the phages.
A) ASegato, B) DejaVu, C) Judebell, and D) RicoCaldo, with capsid diameters of ~ 68 nm, 60 nm, 57 nm, and 57 nm, respectively.
Description
Microbacterium spp. are Gram-positive bacteria often found on plants, in soil, water, and dairy products, and have also been reported in clinical specimens (Gneiding et al., 2008) . As an avenue to control growth of Microbacterium , either for phage therapy or to minimize contaminations during food production, the isolation and characterization of bacteriophages capable of infecting bacteria of this genus is important. Here, we present the isolation and characterization of four bacteriophages using Microbacterium foliorum B-24224.
Bacteriophages ASegato, DejaVu, Judebell, and RicoCaldo were isolated from grass samples collected in Quincy, Massachusetts, US (Table 1). Each of the grass samples were collected in separate zipper plastic storage bags. Bacteriophages were then collected by first agitating the sample for 1 minute in 20 mL of peptone-yeast extract-calcium (PYCa) liquid medium. Then, 3 mL of the wash was withdrawn using a 5 mL syringe and passed through a sterile Whatman GD/X 0.2 μM PES filter. 500 μL of the filtered wash was then mixed with 500 μL of a saturated culture of Microbacterium foliorum and allowed to sit undisturbed for 10 minutes before 3 mL of warm molten PYCa top agar was added to the mix and immediately plated on PYCa agar plates. The plates were incubated for 24 hr at 30 ˚C, yielding plaques of ASegato, DejaVu, Judebell, and RicoCaldo, which were then purified through 3 additional rounds of plating (Table 1). Negative stain (1% uranyl acetate) transmission electron microscopy revealed ASegato, DejaVu, and Judebell to have a siphovirus morphology while RicoCaldo has a podovirus morphology ( Figure 1 ).
DNA was extracted from bacteriophage lysates using the Wizard DNA Clean-Up System (Promega). Subsequently, the genomes were sequenced with an Illumina MiSeq sequencer (v3 reagents) following library preparation using NEB FS Ultra II kit. Raw reads were then assembled using Newbler v2.9 and assessed for completeness and genome termini using Consed v29, both with default parameters (Gordon et al., 1998, Margulies et al., 2005) . Sequencing data and genome characteristics are provided in Table 1.
All genomes were automatically annotated using Glimmer v3.02 and GeneMarkS v3.28 (Besemer et al., 2001, Besemer et al., 2005, Delcher et al., 2007) . Manual refinement of the annotation made use of Phamerator Actino_draft v578, DNA Master v5.23.6 (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu), and PECAAN v20221109 (Pope et al., 2017, Rinehart et al., 2016, Pope et al., 2017) . Genes that encode for tRNA were predicted using Aragorn v1.2.38 and tRNAscanSE v2.0 (Laslett et al., 2004, Lowe et al., 2016) . Transmembrane proteins were detected by using TMHMM and TOPCONS (Krogh et al., 2001, Tsirigos et al., 2015) . Prediction of protein function was accomplished using HHPred searches against the PDB mmCIF70 8Mar, Pfam-A v37, UniProt-SwissProt-viral70 3, and NCBI Conserved Domainsv3.19 databases and BLASTp searches against the NCBI non-redundant and Actinobacteriophage databases (Altschul et al., 1997, Söding et al., 2005) . Based on gene content similarity of at least 35% to phages in the Actinobacteriophage database, phagesdb (https://phageDB.org), ASegato and DejaVu are assigned to cluster ED (ED2 and ED1 subclusters, respectively), Judebell to cluster EG cluster, and RicoCaldo to subcluster EK2 subcluster (Table 1.) (Pope et al., 2017 Russell and Hatfull 2017p) . All software were used with default settings.
As characteristic of phages in the ED, EG, and EK clusters, none of these newly isolated phages encode identifiable immunity repressor or integrase functions, suggesting they are unlikely to establish lysogeny. RicoCaldo, as is typical for EK phages, encodes a large gene of unknown functions that is 13,470 bp long and which spans 25% of its genome length (Jacobs et al., 2020) .
Data Availability
Genomes are available at GenBank with the following accession numbers: ASegato (OR521059.1), DejaVu (OR475263.1), Judebell (PP946909.1) and RicoCaldo (PP946910.1). Sequencing reads for these genomes are available through the NCBI SRA database with the following SRA accession numbers: ASegato (SRX23452925), DejaVu (SRX23452931), Judebell (SRX26476175), and RicoCaldo (SRX26476176).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the remarkable support of Daniel Russell, Rebecca Garlena, Viknesh Sivanathan, William Biederman, Debra Jacobs-Sera, the Hatfull lab, and the entire leadership within the HHMI SEA-PHAGES program. Their support has included efforts in DNA sequencing, genome assembly, reviewing manuscripts and annotations, providing education for faculty and students, and in administrative work.
Table 1 Isolation and sequencing parameters, and plaque and genome characteristics
| Phage | ASegato | DejaVu | Judebell | RicoCaldo | 
| Sample location GPS coordinates | 42.27307 N, 71.01037 W | 42.2703 N, 71.01062 W | 42.27195 N, 71.01153 W | 42.271501 N, 71.011677 W | 
| Plaque morphology | Halo with clear center | Halo with clear center | Halo with clear center | Clear | 
| 150-base sequencing reads # | 321,892 | 176,383 | 309,122 | 391,445 | 
| Approximate shotgun coverage | 754 | 415 | 715 | 1028 | 
| Genome length (bp) | 63,246 | 63,339 | 61,786 | 54,524 | 
| Genome termini | Direct terminal repeat of 3797 bp | Direct terminal repeat of 2959 bp | Direct terminal repeat of 204 bp | Circularly permuted | 
| % GC | 61.7 | 62.8 | 67 | 59.7 | 
| # ORFs (# with predicted function) | 121 (26) | 123 (25) | 105 (28) | 52 (14) | 
| # tRNAs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 
| Cluster ID | ED2 | ED1 | EG | EK2 | 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the remarkable support of Daniel Russell, Rebecca Garlena, Viknesh Sivanathan, William Biederman, Debra Jacobs-Sera, the Hatfull lab, and the entire leadership within the HHMI SEA-PHAGES program. Their support has included efforts in DNA sequencing, genome assembly, reviewing manuscripts and annotations, providing education for faculty and students, and in administrative work.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Eastern Nazarene College division of Science and Technology and the Life and Chemical Sciences department.
References
- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jun 15;29(12):2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Besemer J, Borodovsky M. GeneMark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W451–W454. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 19;23(6):673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gneiding K, Frodl R, Funke G. Identities of Microbacterium spp. encountered in human clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Sep 17;46(11):3646–3652. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01202-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998 Mar 1;8(3):195–202. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs-Sera D, Abad LA, Alvey RM, Anders KR, Aull HG, Bhalla SS, Blumer LS, Bollivar DW, Bonilla JA, Butela KA, Coomans RJ, Cresawn SG, D'Elia T, Diaz A, Divens AM, Edgington NP, Frederick GD, Gainey MD, Garlena RA, Grant KW, Gurney SMR, Hendrickson HL, Hughes LE, Kenna MA, Klyczek KK, Kotturi H, Mavrich TN, McKinney AL, Merkhofer EC, Moberg Parker J, Molloy SD, Monti DL, Pape-Zambito DA, Pollenz RS, Pope WH, Reyna NS, Rinehart CA, Russell DA, Shaffer CD, Sivanathan V, Stoner TH, Stukey J, Sunnen CN, Tolsma SS, Tsourkas PK, Wallen JR, Ware VC, Warner MH, Washington JM, Westover KM, Whitefleet-Smith JL, Wiersma-Koch HI, Williams DC, Zack KM, Hatfull GF. Genomic diversity of bacteriophages infecting Microbacterium spp. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 18;15(6):e0234636–e0234636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001 Jan 19;305(3):567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laslett D, Canback B. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 2;32(1):11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowe TM, Chan PP. tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 May 12;44(W1):W54–W57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer ML, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005 Jul 31;437(7057):376–380. doi: 10.1038/nature03959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D. Annotation of Bacteriophage Genome Sequences Using DNA Master: An Overview. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1681:217–229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pope WH, Mavrich TN, Garlena RA, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Jacobs-Sera D, Montgomery MT, Russell DA, Warner MH, Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) Hatfull GF. Bacteriophages of Gordonia spp. Display a Spectrum of Diversity and Genetic Relationships. mBio. 2017 Aug 15;8(4) doi: 10.1128/mBio.01069-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rinehart CA, Gaffney BL, Smith JR, Wood JD. 2016. PECAAN: Phage Evidence Collection and Annotation Network user guide. Western Kentucky University Bioinformatics and Information Science Center, Bowling Green, KY
- Russell DA, Hatfull GF. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics. 2017 Mar 1;33(5):784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsirigos KD, Peters C, Shu N, Käll L, Elofsson A. The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 May 12;43(W1):W401–W407. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

