Skip to main content
The British Journal of Occupational Therapy logoLink to The British Journal of Occupational Therapy
. 2024 Oct 21;88(2):70–84. doi: 10.1177/03080226241288157

Factors affecting retention of occupational therapists in adult mental health service: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

Wenting Yan 1, Sally Ohlsen 1,2, Emily Wood 1,
PMCID: PMC11887576  PMID: 40336781

Abstract

Introduction:

There are over 43,000 occupational therapists across the United Kingdom, with mental health occupational therapists being acknowledged as a main workforce of OT services. However, staff shortages are occurring, and urgent action is needed to retain this important workforce.

Methods:

The systematic literature search was conducted in the CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus databases to identify research literature published since 2008. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, a narrative synthesis was utilized.

Results:

A total of 20 studies (21 papers) were included in the review. Five thematic factors – well-being at work, organizational work environment factors, job resources, supervision and staffing, along with various subtheme factors emerged from the synthesis. The findings suggest that retaining mental health occupational therapists is a complex issue, affected by many factors. The study emphasizes the triangular relationship among three aspects of well-being (job satisfaction, professional identity and burnout) at work and introduces the concept of a ’Retention Ecosystem’. This illustrates how subtheme factors interconnect and influence the retention of mental health occupational therapists.

Conclusion:

The retention of mental health occupational therapists is revealed to be a multifaceted challenge. There is a need for developing more targeted, meaningful and holistic strategies for retaining the current mental health occupational therapist workforce.

Keywords: Mental health, occupational therapists, retention, job satisfaction, workforce turnover

Introduction

Occupational therapy, as a patient-centred health profession, is committed to improving health and well-being through meaningful engagement in various activities. The global presence of over 633,000 practicing occupational therapists, as reported by the World Federation of occupational Therapists (WFOT) (2018) underscores the substantial workforce contributing to healthcare. Collaborating across diverse settings, occupational therapists facilitate individuals, groups and communities in participating in activities that contribute to a fulfilling life (World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT), 2018). With specializations ranging from paediatric to geriatric care, these professionals operate in multiple environments, including hospitals, community services and long-term care facilities (AdventHealth University, 2023). Recognizing the importance of a sufficient number of occupational therapists to meet the population’s needs, further research into workforce dynamics is recommended (Jesus et al., 2023).

In the United Kingdom, occupational therapists are integral to mental health services and are recognized as one of the 14 Allied Health Professions, playing a crucial role in enhancing the daily living of individuals facing mental health challenges (Royal College of Occupational Therapists (RCOT), 2017). Similar recognition exists in Australia (Cook, 2019) and Canada (Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT), n.d.), where both acknowledge the critical contribution of occupational therapists in managing mental health issues, particularly during and after the pandemic crisis. Also, despite the fundamental role of occupational therapists in mental health in the United States, their full potential remains largely untapped (American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA), 2023). Without a concurrent focus on the occupational therapists themselves, the global emphasis on mental health occupational therapy may result in workforce challenges and hinder recruitment and retention in the mental health occupational therapy sector (Rodger et al., 2009).

In the healthcare workforce, job satisfaction is a critical factor influencing staff retention within occupational therapy (Bimpong et al., 2020). Research has shown that staff who are satisfied are less likely to leave their positions compared to those with low satisfaction or who are experiencing burnout (Cosgrave et al., 2018; Mertala et al., 2022). Job satisfaction among mental health occupational therapists (MHOTs) is affected by various factors including workload, support and organizational change, highlighting the intricate nature of their work (Scanlan and Still, 2013). Several studies (Edwards and Dirette, 2010; Roundy et al., 2023) have explored the burnout issues among occupational therapists worldwide, demonstrating that this professional group is considered at high risk for burnout. Considering that burnout frequently impacts medical professionals, examining the role of occupational therapists is essential (Janus et al., 2018). MHOTs, like other health professionals, facing intense workloads and high patient demands, are susceptible to burnout (Painter et al., 2003). They not only face stress like all healthcare workers but also work in less-than-ideal conditions for their specific tasks, such as dealing with distressed individuals and limited patient progress (Painter et al., 2003). These challenges can affect their well-being, therapeutic effectiveness and contributes to retention challenges (Painter et al., 2003; Unison, 2017). However, there have been relatively few studies that specifically investigate burnout among occupational therapists in mental health settings (Lloyd and King, 2004). Furthermore, little is known about the longer-term impacts, such as current workforce shortages, which may deter newcomers from entering the OT field (Haig and Summerfield-Mann, 2016).

Much of the existing research on retention challenges is centred on broader healthcare groups or specific professions such as nursing or physicians, with occupational therapists in mental healthcare systems receiving comparatively less focus. Although some studies have focused on OT retention (Freda, 1992; Millsteed, 2002), there is a noticeable absence of a systematic review that synthesizes evidence on retention factors specifically impacting therapists in mental health services. Occupational therapists are essential to mental health care, playing an important role in service delivery. Considering the adverse effects of high turnover on patient care and safety, it is critical to understand the specific factors that lead to MHOTs considering or deciding to leave their positions. Such insight is vital for developing effective, targeted retention strategies to address this issue.

This study aims to expand current knowledge about MHOTs by reviewing diverse literature to gain a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence retention among occupational therapists in mental health services, and to inform effective retention strategies for future studies.

Methods

Search strategy and search process

A systematic approach was employed using three databases (CINAHL, PsycInfo and Scopus). The selection of the databases were discussed by all the reviews. The target population of this research is OTs. CINAHL provides specific sources of scholarly materials for allied health professions, including occupational therapists. PsycInfo identifies scholarly literature on psychology and related fields, aligning with the research focus on the mental health field. To broaden the search, Scopus was chosen to find more related literature. The search was divided into two stages.

Preliminary search

Preliminary unstructured searches were undertaken to familiarize ourselves with the topic and refine the search terms. These findings also shaped the introduction of this article.

The initial search indicated that relevant studies were limited and primarily conducted in Australia. As a result, we decided to broaden our research to include OTs working in mental health services across various countries, and the search terms were broadened to ensure that no relevant articles were accidently excluded.

Structure search

To include relevant articles as much as possible and to keep the relevance of the research question, search terms included in the review are followed:

  • • Occupational therapist (and derivatives) AND

  • • Retention OR burnout OR turnover OR job satisfaction (and derivatives) AND

  • • Mental health OR mental health service (and derivatives)

The search was conducted on 26 October 2023. Full details of the search strategy are provided in Supplemental Appendix 1.

Inclusion criteria

To better align the selection with the research topic and ensure relevance, the criteria outlined in Table 1 were applied. This approach aimed to include a variety of studies on mental health OTs, their working conditions, and retention factors, offering a detailed overview of the field’s current landscape.

Table 1.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Criteria Inclusion description Exclusion description
Population Studies targeting OTs who specialize in mental health or are employed in mental health settings, and include individuals across all ages, experience levels and staff grades OTs in non-mental health settings Other mental health staff such as nurses
Settings Studies targeting on OTs within various mental health settings Non-mental health settings
Outcomes Studies reporting factors that affect the retention of OTs in mental health settings or services is included. Additionally, studies reporting findings on factors impacting job satisfaction, staff well-being, burnout, or stress among mental health occupational therapists, along with the examination of the effects of staffing levels or related strategies Studies that do not report retention or outcomes linked to retention
Study Design All types of study designs, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method studies, were considered for inclusion Reviews, theses, editorials conference proceedings
Time period To account for the potential impact of the 2008 economic disruption on various factors, studies were selected based on their publication date, spanning from 2008 to the present Studies published before 2008

Study selection

Search results from three databases were exported to EndNote 21, where duplicates were removed. This was followed by screening titles and abstracts. Full-text articles were then reviewed to select studies meeting the inclusion criteria. This process was collaboratively undertaken by three researchers (WY, EW and SO). Researcher WY took the initial step of downloading and examining full papers of all tentatively selected studies to verify compliance with the inclusion criteria. During the full-text review phase, all researchers thoroughly read each paper and collectively made decisions regarding their eligibility. Additionally, eligible studies were also identified by screening the reference lists of related studies, and a manual search was conducted to find relevant literature.

Data extraction

Data were extracted using an excel spreadsheet designed specifically to gather the necessary information to answer the research question. The extracted data included the study design, study population, country of study, setting of the study, main findings and the authors’ conclusions. Regarding the study population, only data pertaining to MHOTs were extracted; data on study participants who were not occupational therapists were not included in the table. The research process was primarily conducted by researcher WY, in collaboration with researchers SO and EW. Discrepancies was identified and resolved through discussion.

Quality assessment

Assessing the methodological quality of the included papers is essential for ensuring the reliability and validity of the synthesized evidence. Due to the heterogeneity of the included articles, quality assurance was conducted utilizing established tools tailored to the included specific studies methods.

The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools for Qualitative Research (Lockwood et al., 2015) was used to assess the quality of qualitative studies. AXIS critical appraisal of cross-sectional Studies (Downes et al., 2016) was used to assess the quality of all quantitative survey studies. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) tool version 2018 (Hong et al., 2018) was used to appraise mixed-method studies.

Disagreements among review authors regarding the quality assessment of specific studies were resolved through discussion. It is important to note that while the assessed quality of the articles will be thoroughly commented on in the review, no articles will be excluded based on quality criteria, ensuring a comprehensive representation of the available evidence.

Data synthesis

This research employs narrative synthesis approach to present its finding, due to the significant diversity observed among the selected studies in terms of study design, the validated surveys or scales employed, data collection methods and the outcomes reported. Given this diversity, a meta-analysis is deemed unsuitable for this report. Instead, a narrative approach is chosen, allowing for the analysis of relationships within individual studies and between different studies (Popay et al., 2006). We chose the narrative approach as our primary method for conducting the synthesis. To complement this, we also employed thematic synthesis, which allowed us to analyse differences between cases (Zelčāne and Pipere, 2023).

To incorporate quantitative findings into our narrative synthesis, we utilized a technique known as ‘qualitization of data’, as outlined by Pluye and Hong (2014). This process transforms statistical data gathered from surveys, questionnaires and secondary data sets into text. This methodological choice ensures a comprehensive understanding of the synthesized evidence, contributing to the rigour of this research. The data transformation process can be seen in Supplemental Appendix 2 in the supplementary resources.

Results

Search results and study selection

In the initial search, a total of 1218 papers were identified. By removing duplicates, 80 papers were excluded. Subsequently, 991 papers were eliminated after title review and 83 more were excluded following abstract review. After a full-text assessment, 45 additional papers were excluded due to lack of relevance. In full-text review stage, we also found an overlap between two studies (Ceramidas et al., 2009; Ceramidas, 2010). In Ceramidas (2010), the author extracted the Australian results from Ceramidas et al. (2009) and provided a more detailed description. Therefore, we decided to combine them into one entry as one of the included studies. The selected articles were supplemented by searches for citations and references. In the final stage, 20 articles were included. Additionally, one more article was identified from the references cited within the selected studies, bringing the total number of included papers to 21, with the total number of included studies remaining at 20. For an overview of the study selection process, please see Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Study selection process.

Description of the included studies

Table 2 presents characteristics of 21 peer-reviewed papers since 2008, involving 1069 MHOTs, excluding unspecified numbers in Phoenix and Taylor (2023) and Ceramidas et al. (2009). Conducted across six countries, with the majority in Australia (10), followed by the United Kingdom (4), Sweden (2), Ireland, the USA, Turkey and Bahrain (1 each). The mental health services included in the studies comprised state-run or territory-run Mental Health Services, Ministry of Mental Health Services, NHS, Mental Health NGOs, Psychiatric Services and Private Services. The studies were conducted in different settings within the mental health services: over half of the studies (N = 11) were conducted in settings including community mental health service, while the others included Inpatient Settings (acute wards, forensic wards, etc.), and psychiatric clinics.

Table 2.

Study characteristic.

Authors Year Aims Study design Country Settings Sample size (OT) Outcome measures Factors affecting retention or turnover identified
quantitative qualitative
Abendstern et al. 2017 To identify (a) who occupational therapists in CMHTs for older people see; (b) the nature of their role; and (c) how they perceive this, including their job stress and satisfaction Mixed-methods study
Quantitative Descriptive
Qualitative case analysis
United Kingdom Community mental health service for older people Qualitative interviews: 5 OTs in 5 CMHTs from 5 Trusts (N = 5)
Questionnaire: 25 OTs in CMHTs from 9 Trusts (N = 25)
Job content questionnaire Semistructured interview Professional isolation
Professional value and identity
Quality of support
Tailored supervision
The erosion of control
Ashby et al. 2013 To explore the dynamic processes involved in the development and maintenance of professional resilience of experienced mental health occupational therapy practitioners Qualitative case analysis Australia Specialized services for child and adolescence, acute inpatient mental health units, community mental health teams, a specialized psychotherapy unit and community-based rehabilitation services OTs with more than 2 years’ experience in mental health and who had worked in more than one workplace
N = 9
Two rounds of Interviews 120–160 min stage one interview 90–160 minutes in-depth interview Professional identity
Professional supervision
Occupation-based practice Development of professional networking
Baker, Canvin and Berzins 2019 To explore the impact of staffing and skill mix on safety and quality of care in mental health inpatient and community services Qualitative case analysis Sweden The UK Mental Health Services OTs working in community mental health team and clinical lead community
N = 2
24–63 minutes, semi-structured telephone interviews Chronic understaffing
Staff burden like workloads and mandatory administrative requirement
Burnout
Unsafe staffing
Ceramidas et al. 2009 The WFOT International Advisory Group on Mental Health (IAG: MH) utilized a cross-sectional survey design pilot study to examine mental health occupational therapy practice in a sample of 10 officially participating countries. Two of these countries withdrew due to logistical difficulties. Mixed-methods
Cross-sectional survey including quantitative and qualitative methods
Seven countries (Argentina, Australia, Canada, South Africa, Sweden, the USA, Venezuela; Data from New Zealand were not reported due to a low response rate) Mental health service
(In-patient, community outpatient, private organization)
Mental health OTs working in seven different countries
N = 1185 (including the number of Australian OT)
Country-developed questionnaire Country-developed questionnaire
Positive mental health fieldwork experience (work environment)
Ongoing professional support
Material resources
Ceramidas 2010 To offer an updated understanding of the current Australian MHOT work- force using data from the Australian data subset of the 2009 WFOT study. Mixed-methods cross-sectional survey including quantitative and qualitative methods Australia Mental health services in Australia with the exception of Queensland State MHOTs
N = 214
Quantitative data from designed survey Qualitative data from designed survey Role blurring; resource shortages (physical and human resources) Supervision and support from senior OT
Career advancement
Workforce shortage: team skill mix imbalances and skill generalization
Community service: understaffed, high workloads, high level of stress
Dahlbäck and Håkansson 2023 To compare the self-perceived organizational and social work environment regarding workload, control, community, reward, justice, and values in different job sectors Quantitative descriptive
cross-sectional
Sweden Psychiatric health care sector A member of the Swedish Association of Occupational Therapists as of February 2008, working in psychiatric health care.
N = 278
Researcher-developed web survey consisted of questions on sociodemographic characteristics and QPS mismatch questionnaire Organizational and social working conditions
Well-being at work
Ercan Doğu, Özkan and Kars 2023 To investigate the clinical practices, challenges, and job satisfaction of occupational therapists working in CMHCs in Turkey Quantitative descriptive correlational
cross-sectional
Turkey Community mental health centres in different provinces in Turkey OTs working for CMHC
N = 28
Researcher-developed questionnaire consisted of five sections: demographics and professional experience, workplace practices (models, assessments, and interventions), work challenges, specific clinical topics, and the training they attended and needs of training. Job satisfaction
A supportive team
Training opportunities
Need for supervision and education
Goh et al. 2019 To explore what assists occupational therapists to thrive within generic roles in Australia’s non-government mental health sector Qualitative case analysis Australia Mental health NGOs OTs employed in a generic NGO mental health sector role
N = 12
40–100 min, face-to-face or phone, semi-structured, in-depth interviews Supervision
Professional socialization
A strong sense of professional identity
Haertl et al. 2009 To explore factors influencing satisfaction and perceived efficacy of services at a free-standing psychiatric occupational therapy clinic Mixed-methods study Quantitative descriptive
Qualitative case analysis
USA A free-standing community-based psychiatric occupational therapy clinic OTs working in the PRC
N = 9
Researcher-developed survey consisted of questions on descriptive information, Likert-based questions, and open-ended questions Semi-structured interviews Supportive team and management See clients for a longer duration Flexibility and autonomy, and perceived efficacy of services
Pay and benefits.
Hardaker et al. 2011 To describe the demographic and employment characteristics of Australian occupational therapists working in youth mental health and explore the relationship between these characteristics and the occupational therapist’s role Mixed-methods
Cross-sectional
survey including quantitative
and qualitative
methods
Australia Youth mental health service Australian occupational therapists working in mental health with a caseload that included young people aged 12–25 years N = 63 Researcher-developed survey consisted of questions on current employment, personal characteristics, education and training, service provision, early intervention, and facilitators and barriers to service Qualitative survey data Undergraduate education and placement experience
Ongoing team support and supervision
Clear delineation of OT’s roles
Hayes et al. 2008 To inform strategies to promote occupational therapists’ recruitment and retention Mixed-methods study Australia A mental health service in northern and western metropolitan Melbourne (Community-based care and acute inpatient care) OTs working clinically in NWMH
N = 47
Researcher-developed questionnaire consisted of questions on demographic data and career path, perceptions about current position, factors related to maintaining or changing employment, professional supervision, and professional development opportunities Qualitative data were collected using open-ended questions in a researcher-developed questionnaire Regular professional supervision, professional development opportunities
Social/emotional work environment, opportunities for career advancement
Jahrami 2009 To determine the extent to which occupational therapy staff employed in a Bahrain mental health setting were affected by burnout Quantitative descriptive
Census cross-sectional
Bahrain A psychiatric hospital in Bahrain. MHOTs from the occupational therapy department
N = 4
Burnout was measured by MBI Depersonalization
Johnson et al. 2012 To describe staff well-being and satisfaction in a multicentre UK National Health Service (NHS) sample and explore associated factors Quantitative descriptive correlational
Cross-sectional
United Kingdom 100 in-patient wards (acute general wards, rehabilitation wards, forensic wards, child and adolescent mental health wards, PICUs) and 36 community teams (CMHTs and CRTs) in 19 mental health Trusts in England OTs working in mental health trusts in England
N = 82
Questionnaire-based survey consisted of Maslach burnout inventory, Job-related affective well-being scale, 2004 Workplace employment Relations Survey and the NHS Staff Survey, GHQ-12 and the Job Involvement Scale Burnout
O’Connell and McKay 2010 To address these uncertainties by establishing the profile, the work practices and the perspectives of occupational therapists working in CMHTs in Ireland Mixed-methods study
Quantitative descriptive
Qualitative case analysis
Ireland Community mental health teams OTs identified through a database developed by the Department of Occupational Therapy at the University of Limerick
N = 21
Researcher-developed questionnaire
consisted of questions on demographic data, current satisfaction in the workplace, workplace practices and a Likert scale
Semi-structured interviews Job satisfaction: lack of resources (human and organizational), lack of support systems in the community; caseload
OTs’ functioning: External influence (Resources (staff/space), and Support/supervision); Team dynamics (Communication, and Role blurring)
Parkinson et al. 2015 To investigate barriers and facilitators of profession-specific working for mental health occupational therapists, and the impact of profession-specific working on job satisfaction and occupational outcomes Mixed-methods
Cross-sectional survey including quantitative and qualitative methods
United Kingdom A leading mental health provider for approximately one million people who were living in mixed urban and rural environments in the middle of England MHOTs
N = 10
Questionnaire-based survey consisted of Occupational therapy workload and team questionnaire, Service user satisfaction survey Semi-structured interview using the WEIS tool Work in a profession-specific way
Team size
Work environment
Phoenix and Taylor 2023 To compare different staffing models involving occupational therapists and make recommendations for preferred staffing models Mixed-methods
Longitudinal comparative study including quantitative and qualitative methods
Quantitative descriptive correlational
Cross-sectional
United Kingdom Acute mental health setting within NHS trust and social care trust Quantitative electronic records Qualitative electronic records OT-led staffing models
Scanlan and Hazelton 2019 To explore the relationships between job satisfaction, burnout, professional identity and meaningfulness of work activities for occupational therapists working in mental health. Quantitative descriptive correlational
Cross-sectional
Australia Mental health services across Australia, including inpatient, community and other settings OTs working in mental health and have direct client contact
N = 118
Researcher-developed online survey:
Job satisfaction was measured by a single-item question;
Burnout was measured by OLBI;
Professional identity was measured by PIQ;
Meaningfulness of work activities was measured by a time-use diary adapted from MOQ
Well-being at work: Job Satisfaction, burnout, professional identity and meaningfulness of work activities
Scanlan and Still 2013 To examine factors related to job satisfaction, turnover intention, and burnout in a group of occupational therapists in mental health Quantitative descriptive correlational
Cross-sectional
Australia Inpatient and community-based mental health services OTs working in a large metropolitan public mental health service
N = 34
Researcher-developed survey
consisted of questions on demographics, characteristics of current position, likes and dislikes of current position, what attracted the respondent to apply for their current position, job satisfaction, turnover intention, job demands and job resources and burnout. Burnout was measured by OLBI
Turnover intention and job satisfaction: burnout (disengagement and exhaustion); job hindrance; rewards (remuneration and recognition)
Positive factors: Supportive team, challenging work, opportunities to developed new skills, location, clients, and variety
Negative factors: difficulties with manager/poor team management, stress and fatigue, poor organizational management, workload, poor team communication and administrative issues/paperwork
Scanlan, Meredith and Poulsen 2013 To explore factors associated with wellbeing at work and turnover intention in a sample of occupational therapists working in mental health Quantitative descriptive correlational
Cross-sectional
Australia Mental health services in Queensland OTs who identified mental health as their primary clinical area and registered in Queensland
N = 103
Researcher-developed survey consisted of questions on work–life balance, effort invested in work, rewards received from work, well-being at work (job satisfaction, burnout and work engagement) and turnover intention.
Burnout was measured by OLBI
Work engagement was measured by UWES-17
Rewards in terms of recognition and prestige
Supporting satisfactory work/life balance
Access to work that OT find challenging and personally rewarding
Scanlan et al. 2010 To describe recruitment and retention issues as reported by mental health occupational therapists employed by a large Area Health service in metropolitan Sydney Quantitative descriptive
Cross-sectional
Australia Sydney Southwest Area Health Service (SSWAHS) OTs in the AMHS
N = 38
Quantitative data from researcher-developed questionnaire Interesting work (challenging work) Opportunity to use occupational therapy skill
Location (distance from home)
Team dynamics and team management
Nature of workload/workload Structure and organization of work Supervision
Professional and career development
Scanlan, Devine and Watkins 2021 To determine the current levels of job satisfaction for mental healthcare workers (MHCWs) in multidisciplinary teams, and to identify factors that impact this experience. Mixed-methods study
Quantitative descriptive
Qualitative case analysis
Australia Inpatient and community-based multidisciplinary teams of a public mental health service in regional Australia OTs who had over 12 months experience in mental healthcare and in a role providing direct mental healthcare services
N = 14
Researcher-developed web survey consisted of 15 questions covering demographics and aspects of mental healthcare work 60-minute focus group Meaningful work: professional identity and role, use of occupation and client engagement
Team dynamics: quality of team leadership and supportive team members

This review includes different study designs: nine mixed-methods, eight quantitative and three qualitative. Quantitative studies were cross-sectional, utilizing surveys or questionnaires, while qualitative studies were all case studies conducting 40–100 minutes in-depth interviews with MHOTs.

Only five studies (Ashby et al., 2013; Hayes et al., 2008; Scanlan et al., 2010; Scanlan et al., 2013; Scanlan and Still, 2013) directly investigated factors influencing MHOTs’ retention, turnover intention and resilience. The other studies, while focusing on areas like job satisfaction, burnout and work environment, still provided valuable insights into retention determinants. This diversity in design and focus resulted in a wide range of outcome metrics.

Quality assessment

The included studies were categorized into three study designs: (1) Qualitative research (n = 3; Ashby et al. 2013; Baker et al. 2019; Goh et al. 2019) (2) Quantitative descriptive research (n = 8; Dahlbäck and Hakansson, 2023; Ercan Doğu et al., 2023; Jahrami, 2009; Johnson et al., 2012; Scanlan et al., 2010, 2013; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019; Scanlan and Still, 2013) (3) Mixed-method research (n = 10) (Abendstern et al., 2017; Ceramidas et al., 2009; Ceramidas, 2010; Hardaker et al., 2011; Hayes et al., 2008; Haertl et al., 2009; O’Connell and McKay, 2010; Parkinson et al., 2015; Phoenix and Taylor, 2023; Scanlan et al., 2021). Details of the individual assessments for each category and the specific studies are available in Supplemental Appendix 3 of the supplementary documents.

In the assessment of qualitative research studies, a cut-off point was set where at least six out of 10 questions needed to be answered with ‘yes’ (6/10) to indicate that the study is of high quality (Nan et al., 2022). All included qualitative studies achieved a score of 8 but lacked details on the researchers’ backgrounds (Q6 & Q7).

In evaluating quantitative studies, AXIS differentiated their quality into high (70–100%), fair (60%–69.9%), and low (0%–59.9%) categories. Although all studies fell into the high category (70%–85%), only three were likely representative of the intended population (Dahlbäck and Hakansson, 2023; Ercan Doğu et al., 2023; Jahrami, 2009;), and just two addressed non-response bias concerns (Jahrami, 2009; Johnson et al., 2012). Furthermore, one study’s (Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019) sampling and selection methods were deemed suboptimal, noting that surveys targeted occupational therapists in leadership roles with an ‘at arm’s length’ recruitment approach.

Mixed-method studies varied in quality (40%–100%), with all qualitative components meeting criteria except for two studies (Hardaker et al., 2011; Parkinson et al., 2015) with insufficient qualitative data interpretation. Five studies (Abendstern et al., 2017; Hayes et al., 2008; Parkinson et al., 2015; Phoenix and Taylor, 2023; Scanlan et al., 2021) failed to represent the target population adequately due to limited setting descriptions and small sizes, and only three studies (Hayes et al., 2008; Haertl et al., 2009; Parkinson et al., 2015) were considered to not have a low response rate.

In conclusion, the quality of the studies was not very satisfactory but reached an acceptable level. Although the quality of some studies, such as Parkinson et al. (2015), is relatively poor, no study was excluded, aiming to offer a broad view of factors affecting MHOT retention.

Findings

Research has identified a range of factors affecting the retention of MHOTs, with certain factors recurrently mentioned across multiple studies. To better identify the factors impacting MHOT retention across studies and to compile the evidence, various factors have been listed in Supplemental Appendix 4. To better interpret the collected evidence, we categorized the factors to answer the research question (See Table 3).

Table 3.

Factors generated from evidence.

Thematic factors Subthemes factors
Well-being at work Job satisfaction
Professional identity
Burnout (work engagement and exhaustion)
Organizational work environment factors Peer support in workplace community
Workload
Self-perceived value and organizational justice
Job resources Career progression and trainings
Supervision Quality of supervision
Staffing Staffing level and model

Theme 1: Well-being at work – Job satisfaction, Professional Identity and Burnout (work management and exhaustion)

Well-being at work is essential for retaining MHOTs and consists of three primary components: job satisfaction, professional identity and burnout (Scanlan and Still, 2013). Burnout itself includes work engagement and exhaustion (Scanlan et al., 2013; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019). Several factors have been identified that impact well-being at work, and there are also interrelationships among the three aspects.

Job satisfaction

Job satisfaction is the overall happiness and fulfillment one feels in their work, identified as key in lowering turnover intentions and enhancing workplace well-being (Scanlan et al., 2013).

Support is the most significant factor impacting job satisfaction, with five studies (Ercan Doğu et al., 2023; Haertl et al., 2009; O’Connell and McKay, 2010; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019; Scanlan et al., 2021) directly identifying support from colleagues, teams and leaders as crucial for safeguarding job satisfaction. In contrast, challenges with managers can increase MHOTs’ intent to leave, as found in the study by Scanlan et al. (2013).

Another factor emphasized by MHOTs was the use and practice of OT-specific skills. Studies (Parkinson et al., 2015; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019) show higher satisfaction when roles are primarily OT-focused. One study (Goh et al., 2019) particularly suggested NGOs could boost MHOTs’ satisfaction by valuing their profession-specific skills. But this doesn’t imply MHOTs should only undertake OT-specific tasks and avoid generic duties. As one participant stated:

When I am doing generic work . . . I am always an OT at some level. I’m quite comfortable with that. I am focusing on people’s functional abilities. I am focusing on the way they are relating to people, how independent they are. I am always doing that. (Participant H in Abendstern et al., p.26)

However, it is not advisable to overload MHOTs with generic roles, as an experienced MHOT from a public sector stated:

The MHOT role is becoming more generic, and we are at risk of losing some of our core OT skills unless we can retain experienced OTs to mentor and guide new OTs. (Abendstern et al., p.413)

Abendstern et al. (2017) concluded finding a balance between specialist and generic roles for MHOTs could lead to greater job satisfaction among MHOTs and may be beneficial for workforce retention and recruitment.

Job resource is another critical factor in job satisfaction, including rewards and supervision. Interestingly, rewards aren’t just monetary, MHOTs satisfied with their pay sometimes report lower job satisfaction (Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019). They prioritize non-monetary rewards like recognition, prestige and acknowledgement from managers and peers colleagues (Scanlan et al., 2013; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019).

Meanwhile, MHOTs can find job satisfaction through meaningful work and patient engagement (Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019; Scanlan et al., 2021). Studies (Haertl et al., 2009; Scanlan et al., 2021) have pointed out that engagement with patients could facilitate job satisfaction for MHOTs. Because MHOTs can achieve job satisfaction when working directly with clients (Scanlan et al., 2021) and when they are able to see clients for a longer duration (Haertl et al., 2009). This may be due to the nature of OT work, which emphasizes client-centred practice.

Professional identity

Research consistently indicates that maintaining professional identity is crucial for MHOTs, affecting job satisfaction and retention. Studies (Ashby et al., 2013; Scanlan et al., 2010; Ceramidas, 2010; Parkinson et al., 2015; Phoenix and Taylor, 2023; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019; Scanlan et al., 2021) have documented the erosion of this identity when OTs engage in tasks outside their specialized field. A comparative study by Phoenix and Taylor (2023) evaluated two different staffing models: an OT-led team and an experimental model incorporating OTs into ward shift numbers. The experimental model was associated with a lack of professional identity, which correlated with poor retention rates. Some OTs reported, ’OTs are too busy doing non-OT work’. This lack or loss of professional identity was also described in other studies as a reduction in MHOTs’ roles (Scanlan et al., 2021) or role blurring with a nursing focus instead of an OT focus (Ceramidas, 2010).

Scanlan and Hazelton (2019) using the Professional Identity Questionnaire (PIQ), found that only 35.6% of occupational therapists felt their work was primarily OT- focused. Further analysis identified a significant statistical correlation was found between the meaningfulness of work activities (value to self) and professional identity, suggesting that professional identity could be enhanced by allocating work tasks based on individual occupational therapists’ preferences, thereby optimizing valued activities and dividing the workload.

Further emphasizing the importance of role-specific work, Parkinson et al. (2015) observed that MHOTs engaged in occupation-centric tasks tend to have a more positive views on their roles. Thus, reinforcing the core efficacy of occupational therapy and providing opportunities to utilize specific OT skills is fundamental in preserving professional identity and fostering resilience (Ashby et al., 2013; Scanlan et al., 2010).

Burnout (work engagement and exhaustion)

Burnout was found to have a statistical correlation with MHOTs’ turnover intentions (Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019). Two studies indicated a significant risk of burnout among OTs. In the studies by Johnson et al. (2012) investigating the mental health workforce in England, OTs were one of two professions that reached the high burnout threshold. Similar to Jahrami (2009), which reported that MHOTs were found to have higher levels of burnout and depersonalization among the mental health workforces.

Two other studies discussed the factors related to work engagement and exhaustion. Feelings of stress/fatigue and the demands of contact with service users and their families were identified as factors associated with higher disengagement and exhaustion, as well as increased burnout. Conversely, factors such as supervisor support, feedback, participation in decision-making and opportunities for involvement in research or quality improvement are linked to lower levels of burnout (Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019). Effort was identified as a factor with a mixed pattern (Scanlan et al., 2013). High effort was associated with greater exhaustion, but high effort accompanied by high rewards may have a positive impact on work engagement, as rewards can motivate people to engage in their roles more fully (Scanlan et al., 2013).

Theme 2: Organizational work environment factors

MHOTs’ decision to stay in their positions is greatly influenced by their work environment, shaping how they view their professional experiences, including workload, workplace relationships and feeling valued and treated fairly (Dahlbäck and Hakansson, 2023). Therefore, this theme is consisted of three subthemes: workplace community, workload, value and justice.

Peer support in workplace community

Support from colleagues, managers and team is considered as the most important components within workplace community, of seven studies identified this (Abendstern et al. 2017; Dahlbäck and Hakansson 2023; Haertl et al. 2009; Hardaker et al. 2011; Scanlan et al. 2010; Scanlan et al., 2021; Scanlan and Hazelton 2019). Team dynamic is essential for MHOTs, and a supportive team was influenced by qualities of colleagues and leaders:

It’s about having the right fit for the team rather than the right set of skills for the team. Skills can be learnt, but personalities can make or break a supportive team. (A community-based OT in Scanlan et al., p.83)

However, one study reported that among all sectors, OTs working in psychiatric healthcare reported the most negative attitudes towards their workplace community (Dahlbäck and Hakansson 2023). Studies have found that MHOTs who face difficulties with managers or work within unsupportive or dysfunctional teams are more likely to leave their jobs (Scanlan et al., 2010; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019). Conversely, MHOTs who are part of a supportive team and have supportive management are better able to engage with their positions (Hardaker et al., 2011; Haertl et al. 2009).

The social work environment is also related to MHOTs’ retention issues (Hayes et al. 2008), and professional socialization was identified as an important component in this matter, considered a useful strategy for maintaining therapists (Ashby et al. 2013; Goh et al. 2019). Professional socialization includes informal and formal professional networks, acting as ’protective factors’ for MHOTs to feel consolidated within their profession. Offering professional supervision by an occupational therapy colleague and developing professional networks are discussed as effective strategies to support MHOTs (Ashby et al. 2013; Goh et al. 2019).

Workload

While ‘workload’ is an objective term, in this context, we are concentrating on MHOT’s perceptions of their workload and its characteristics. Unfavourable workload conditions, such as high workloads and insufficient time, have been identified by MHOTs as factors that can negatively impact their retention (Ceramidas, 2010; Dahlbäck and Hakansson, 2023; Hayes et al., 2008; Scanlan et al., 2010). In a survey assessing workload, OTs in psychiatric healthcare reported a more unfavourable workload compared to those in other sectors (Dahlbäck and Hakansson, 2023). Ceramidas (2010) highlighted understaffing as a primary cause of high workloads and insufficient time. Furthermore, the nature of the workload is also considered crucial for MHOTs, with more engaging work being seen as a positive aspect for their job satisfaction (Scanlan et al. 2010).

Self-perceived value and organizational justice

Self-perceived value refers to those that are consistent between personal and workplace values, and trust in management’s future handling and willingness to recommend the workplace to others (Dahlbäck and Hakansson, 2023), and organizational justice is a term which means employees’ perceptions of fairness in the workplace (Greenberg, 1987), such as managerial impartiality and a willingness to prioritize addressing obstacles (Dahlbäck and Hakansson, 2023). Both the presence of conflicts between personal and workplace values and experiences of unfair treatment signal poor conditions in the work environment. Aspects of value and justice were identified in one study as factors affecting retention (Dahlbäck and Hakansson, 2023), indicating that OTs in psychiatric care reported the lowest means with regard to value and justice.

Theme 3: Job resources

Career progression and trainings

Job resources were explored in six studies (Ceramidas, 2010; Hardaker et al., 2011; Hayes et al., 2008; O’Connell and McKay, 2010; Scanlan et al., 2010; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019), including the opportunities for career progression and trainings. People who want to advance in their career or seek for new challenges at work are more likely to think about quitting their job than those who don’t have that as a reason (Scanlan et al., 2010; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019), which means if there is more progression opportunities or challenging role for MHOTs, they are more likely to stay in their role. MHOTs are also interested in receiving continued professional development (CPD) practise and having opportunities for skill development (Hardaker et al., 2011; Scanlan et al., 2010) and have a strong training need. However, this cannot be fulfilled all the time due to the heavy workloads or pressure from management or funding and other limited resources (Hardaker et al., 2011).

Theme 4: Supervision

Quality of supervision

While supervision is discussed within workplace communities and is seen as a form of professional socialization (Ashby et al., 2013), studies have focused on it differently. Simply providing supervision is not sufficient for retaining the workforce, and the quality of supervision appears to be more significant for MHOTs, particularly for those with less experience. Two studies (Abendstern et al., 2017; Ceramidas, 2010) highlight the critical impact of high-quality supervision on the likelihood of OT students pursuing work in the field of post-graduation and sustaining their job satisfaction. MHOTs in Hayes et al. (2008) reported having different supervision needs at various grades. For instance, as their grades increased, the focus on clinical issues decreased due to their increased clinical experience. Furthermore, access to supervision is a barrier for MHOTs, such as the supervisor’s lack of availability (Abendstern et al., 2017), and irregular supervision due to time constraints (Scanlan et al., 2010). Therefore, O’Connell and McKay (2010) suggested providing appropriate and timely supervision for MHOTs of all grades.

Theme 5: Staffing

Staffing level and model

Three studies have discussed staffing issues (Baker et al., 2019; Ceramidas, 2010; Phoenix and Taylor, 2023). The shortage of human resources not only affects staffing levels but also increases pressure on inexperienced OTs and adds to the workload of the remaining OTs, which can decrease their job satisfaction (Ceramidas, 2010). Thus, the terms ‘unsafe staffing’ and ‘chronic understaffing’ have been used to describe this ‘vicious circle’ (Baker et al., 2019). Moreover, a recent study showed that MHOTs working in OT-led teams had a better work experience, because this arrangement can foster a therapeutic atmosphere (Phoenix and Taylor, 2023).

Discussion

This review identifies various factors influencing retention, categorized into themes such as work well-being, organizational environment, job resources, supervision and staffing. It highlights the complex interplay between these factors and their combined influence on MHOTs’ decisions to stay or leave, offering key insights from a broader perspective. The key messages and findings for MHOTs are outlined below.

The triangular relationship of well-being at work

Central to our findings is the triangular relationship between job satisfaction, professional identity and burnout. Job satisfaction, professional identity and burnout are three aspects of well-being at work that are emphasized the most among all included studies. Job satisfaction is crucial for keeping MHOTs in their roles, and it’s greatly affected by the support they receive from colleagues and their ability to do work that is meaningful and specific to their profession.

Closely linked to job satisfaction is the concept of professional identity, which in the context of MHOTs, is tied to their ability to apply specialized occupational therapy skills. What we’ve found is that when these therapists feel like they’re losing their professional identity, they might start to feel less committed to their jobs, which could make them burn out. Conversely, a robust professional identity seems to act as a protective barrier, mitigating job stress and fostering resilience.

Burnout, a critical issue defined by Maslach and Leiter (2016) as exhaustion and disconnection from occupational values, emerging as a critical outcome of the negative interactions between job satisfaction and professional identity. This loss of connection can cause a bunch of negative outcomes, including reduced patient care quality and higher turnover rates.

Research has investigated the relationship between professional identity and burnout (Edwards and Dirette, 2010), between professional identity and job satisfaction (Scanlan et al., 2013), and between job satisfaction and burnout (Scanlan and Still, 2013; Scanlan and Hazelton, 2019). However, our review has suggested a triangular relationship among job satisfaction, professional identity and burnout. Therefore, further exploration of the interrelationships, bidirectional influences, or causal connections within the context of workplace well-being for MHOTs would be helpful to aid in the strategic support of MHOTs.

The retention ecosystem and the ripple effect of subtheme factors

While subtheme factors may contribute to turnover intentions and therefore impact retention, interactions among them may also play a role. Researchers have already found that the factors influencing the retention of mental health staff are complex but have an important impact on overall retention (Long et al., 2023). Each factor does not exist in isolation but rather has the potential to influence and amplify others. To better explain how these observed factors impact retention, either individually or in combination, we introduce the concept of a ‘Retention Ecosystem’ – a network where each element can initiate a chain reaction, contributing to a complex interplay of influences. It is hard to streamline every interactions within this ‘retention ecosystem’, but we still find some clues to explain them. Our findings indicate ‘impact on wellbeing at work’ consistently emerges as a core factor affecting an MHOT’s decision to stay or leave, and the triangular relationship of well-being at work acts as the foundation of this ecosystem. The subthemes factors identified in the findings influence the Retention Ecosystem, either contributing to its stability or causing disruptions. For instance, inadequate staffing does not simply increase workload, it can erode the professional identity by forcing MHOTs into generalized roles and dilute job satisfaction by creating an unsustainable work environment, thus amplifying the risk of burnout and destabilizing the ecosystem. Meanwhile, good supervision, chances to grow professionally and CPD do more than help individuals, they’re crucial for keeping this ecosystem healthy and are especially helpful for those who are new to the profession to build up their professional identity, which has the potential to create positive reaction throughout the ecosystem.

The broader implications for retention

Within this retention ecosystem framework, it’s evident that MHOTs’ desire to leave isn’t driven by a single stressor but by the combined effect of multiple factors. This insight highlights the need for specific strategies tailored to the unique experiences of MHOTs, rather than relying on generic solutions. Therefore, healthcare organizations must rethink about approaches to retaining MHOTs. In this study, we propose that MHOT retention could be improved by

  • (1) Development of a comprehensive support system: This involves establishing peer support groups and mentorship programmes in both structured and casual settings, as well as creating ways to foster a more positive social and emotional work environment.

  • (2) Development of career ladders: Clear pathways, especially the long-term career paths for professional growth can provide MHOTs with a sense of progression and future within their roles, which is essential for long-term retention. Particularly focusing on training and replacement opportunities for new OT graduates and developing strategies to offer work variety, challenges and skill development.

  • (3) Strategies for strengthening professional identity: Effective approaches are needed to motivate occupational therapists to use OT-specific skills, while also making sure that these skills are acknowledged and appreciated by other professions and management. It’s also important to find the right balance between specialized and general roles for mental health occupational therapists.

  • (4) Strategies for workload management: Effective strategies to manage workloads include delegating appropriate tasks to support staff or less-experienced team members, with proper training provided. Focus on hiring both new graduates and experienced therapists to maintain adequate staffing levels and implement flexible staffing models to adjust to changing work demands.

Study limitations

One limitation of this study is the exclusion of grey literature, which may mean that the evidence collected is not fully comprehensive. On the other hand, a strength of this review is its inclusion of studies from various countries, offering a global perspective. However, with nearly half of the papers coming from Australia, the generalizability of some findings to MHOTs working in the United Kingdom, especially within the NHS, may be limited. Another constraint is the predominant use of cross-sectional study designs. While they have identified certain factors influencing MHOT retention, the constantly evolving nature of global health environments means that these factors’ impact on retention can change over time. As a result, some factors identified in this review may not hold the same weight for today’s workforce, while others may have gained importance. Furthermore, given the variety within the mental health service sector, each with its unique therapeutic focus and patient characteristics, there is a clear need for more research. Such research should explore retention factors specific to different sectors within mental health services, to develop more targeted, meaningful and detailed strategies for the current workforce.

Conclusion

Understanding the retention ecosystem is important for healthcare organizations to improve MHOT retention. It requires a holistic approach that recognizes the interconnected nature of the factors at play. Our analysis underlines those policies aimed at improving job satisfaction, preserving professional identity and fostering a supportive work environment that is key to successfully retaining MHOTs.

Key findings

  • A triangular relationship within well-being at work and the concept of the ‘retention ecosystem’ has been identified.

  • Future research needs to consistently focus on MHOT workforce across various mental health sectors.

What the study has added

Findings from this study indicate that the retention of MHOTs is a multifaceted challenge, and there is a need to explore the retention ecosystem in order to develop more holistic strategies for the current MHOT workforce.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-bjo-10.1177_03080226241288157 – Supplemental material for Factors affecting retention of occupational therapists in adult mental health service: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-bjo-10.1177_03080226241288157 for Factors affecting retention of occupational therapists in adult mental health service: A systematic review with narrative synthesis by Wenting Yan, Sally Ohlsen and Emily Wood in British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Acknowledgments

None.

Footnotes

Research ethics: Not applicable.

Consent statement: Not applicable.

Patient and public involvement data: During the development, progress and reporting of the submitted research, Patient and Public Involvement in the research was included in planning and progress of the research.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: EW and SO received funding from The Health Foundation (grant number 1275277).

Contributorship: WY, SO and EW designed the study and devised the search strategy. WY and SO conducted the screening. WY conducted the data extraction and analysis. WY wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version. EW is the guarantor.

Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  1. Abendstern M, Tucker S, Wilberforce M, et al. (2017) Occupational therapists in community mental health teams for older people in England: Findings from a five-year research programme. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 80(1): 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  2. AdventHealth University (2023) Types of occupational therapy. Available at: https://www.ahu.edu/blog/types-occupational-therapy (accessed 2 December 2023).
  3. American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) (2023) Support access to occupational therapy mental health services under Medicare and Medicaid. Available at: https://www.aota.org/-/media/corporate/files/advocacy/federal/hillday/2023/ot_mental_health_parity_act_talking_points_118th.pdf (accessed 2 December 2023).
  4. Ashby SE, Ryan S, Gray M, et al. (2013) Factors that influence the professional resilience of occupational therapists in mental health practice. Australian occupational therapy Journal 60: 110–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker JA, Canvin K, Berzins K. (2019) The relationship between workforce characteristics and perception of quality of care in mental health: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 100: 103412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bimpong KAA, Khan A, Slight R, et al. (2020) Relationship between labour force satisfaction, wages and retention within the UK national health service: A systematic review of the literature. BMJ Open 10: e034919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT) (n.d.) Covid-19 occupational therapists: Essential to Mental Health. Available at: https://caot.ca/site/about/ot/mentalhealth (accessed 2 December 2023]).
  8. Ceramidas D, Forn de, Zita C, Eklund M, et al. (2009) The 2009 world team of mental health occupational therapists: A resilient and dedicated workforce. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin 60: 9–17. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ceramidas DM. (2010) A case against generalisation of mental health occupational therapy in Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 57: 409–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cook L. (2019) Mental health in Australia: A quick guide. Available at: https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2019-02/apo-nid220281.pdf (accessed 2 December 2023).
  11. Cosgrave C, Maple M, Hussain R. (2018) Work challenges negatively affecting the job satisfaction of early career community mental health professionals working in rural Australia: Findings from a qualitative study. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice 13: 173–186. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dahlbäck E, Hakansson C. (2023) A comparison of the self- perceived organisational and social work environment among Swedish occupational therapists in different job sectors: An observational study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(4): 3009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Downes MJ, Brennan ML, Williams HC, et al. (2016) Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (axis). BMJ Open 6: e034919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards H, Dirette D. (2010) The relationship between professional identity and burnout among occupational therapists. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 24: 119–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ercan Doğu S, Özkan E, Kars S. (2023) Clinical practices, challenges, and job satisfaction of occupational therapists working in community mental health centers in Turkey. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 86: 504–514. [Google Scholar]
  16. Freda M. (1992) Retaining occupational therapists in rehabilitation settings: Influential factors. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 46: 240–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goh NCK, Hancock N, Honey A, et al. (2019) Thriving in an expanding service landscape: Experiences of occupational therapists working in generic mental health roles within non-government organisations in Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 66: 753–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenberg J. (1987) A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review 12: 9–22. [Google Scholar]
  19. Haertl K, Behrens K, Houtujec J, et al. (2009) Factors influencing satisfaction and efficacy of services at a free-standing psychiatric occupational therapy clinic. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 63: 691–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Haig L, Summerfield-Mann L. (2016) An investigation into the occupational therapy workforce in london . Available at: https://www.rcot.co.uk/sites/default/files/An%20Investigation%20into%20the%20Occupational%20Therapy%20Workforce%20in%20London.pdf (accessed 2 December 2023).
  21. Hardaker L, Halcomb E, Griffiths R, et al. (2011) A survey of 63 Australian occupational therapists working in youth mental health. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 27: 140–154. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hayes R, Bull B, Hargreaves K, et al. (2008) A survey of recruitment and retention issues for occupational therapists working clinically in mental health. Australian occupational Therapy Journal 55: 12–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hong QN, Fa’bregues S, Bartlett G, et al. (2018) The mixed methods appraisal tool (mmat) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information 34: 285–291. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jahrami H. (2009) A survey of burnout of the mental health occupational therapy staff in the psychiatric hospital, Bahrain. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 72: 458–464. [Google Scholar]
  25. Janus E, Gawałkiewicz P, Bac A. (2018) Professional burnout in occupational therapists. Advances in Rehabilitation 32: 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jesus TS, Mani K, von Zweck C, et al. (2023) The global status of occupational therapy workforce research worldwide: A scoping review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 77: 7703205080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnson S, Osborn DP, Araya R, et al. (2012) Morale in the English mental health workforce: questionnaire survey. The British Journal of Psychiatry 201: 239–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lloyd C, King R. (2004) A survey of burnout among Australian mental health occupational therapists and social workers. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 39: 752–757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K. (2015) Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. JBI Evidence Implementation 13: 179–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Long J, Ohlsen S, Senek M, et al. (2023) Realist synthesis of factors affecting retention of staff in UK adult mental health services. BMJ Open 13: e070953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Maslach C, Leiter MP. (2016) Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry 15: 103–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mertala SM, Kanste O, Keskitalo-Leskinen S, et al. (2022) Job satisfaction among occupational therapy practitioners: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 36: 1–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Millsteed J. (2002) Factors affecting the retention of occupational therapists in rural services. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 14: 55–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nan J, Duan Y, Wu S, et al. (2022) Perspectives of older adults, caregivers, healthcare providers on frailty screening in primary care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. BMC Geriatrics 22(1): 482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Connell JE, McKay EA. (2010) Profile, practice and perspectives of occupational therapists in community mental health teams in Ireland. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 73: 219–228. [Google Scholar]
  36. Painter J, Akroyd D, Elliot S, et al. (2003) Burnout among occupational therapists. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 17: 63–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Parkinson S, Di Bona L, Fletcher N, et al. (2015) Profession-specific working in mental health: Impacts for occupational therapists and service users. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy 62: 55–66. [Google Scholar]
  38. Phoenix N, Taylor J. (2023) Experimental staffing models in inpatient acute mental health services. a longitudinal comparative study of occupational therapy services. European Journal of Mental Health 18: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pluye P, Hong QN. (2014) Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health 35: 29–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. (2006) Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC methods programme. Version 1: b92. Lancaster University. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodger S, Thomas Y, Holley S, et al. (2009) Increasing the occupational therapy mental health workforce through innovative practice education: A pilot project. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 56: 409–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Roundy PE, Stearns ZR, Willis MW, et al. (2023) Relationships between burnout and resilience: Experiences of physical therapists and occupational therapists during the covid-19 pandemic. Physical Therapy 103: pzad022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Royal College of Occupational Therapists (RCOT) (2017) About mental health. Available at: https://www.rcot.co.uk/file/1805/download?token=dA7ez-G9 (accessed 2 December 2023).
  44. Scanlan JN, Hazelton T. (2019) Relationships between job satisfaction, burnout, professional identity and meaningfulness of work activities for occupational therapists working in mental health. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 66: 581–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Scanlan JN, Still M. (2013) Job satisfaction, burnout and turnover intention in occupational therapists working in mental health. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 60: 310–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Scanlan JN, Meredith P, Poulsen AA. (2013) Enhancing retention of occupational therapists working in mental health: Relationships between wellbeing at work and turnover intention. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 60(6): 395–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Scanlan JN, Still M, Stewart K, et al. (2010) Recruitment and retention issues for occupational therapists in mental health: Balancing the pull and the push. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 57: 102–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Scanlan LM, Devine SG, Watkins DL. (2021) Job satisfaction of mental healthcare workers in multidisciplinary teams. Journal of Mental Health 30: 80–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Unison (2017) Struggling to cope: Mental health staff and services under pressure. Available at: https://www.unison.org.uk/content/uploads/2017/10/Struggling-toCope.pdf (accessed 2 December 2023).
  50. World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) (2018) Definitions of occupational therapy from member organizations. Available at: https://wfot.org/resources/definitions-of-occupational-therapy-from-member-organisations (accessed 2 December 2023).
  51. Zelčāne E, Pipere A. (2023) Finding a path in a methodological jungle: A qualitative research of resilience. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 18: 2164948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-docx-1-bjo-10.1177_03080226241288157 – Supplemental material for Factors affecting retention of occupational therapists in adult mental health service: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-bjo-10.1177_03080226241288157 for Factors affecting retention of occupational therapists in adult mental health service: A systematic review with narrative synthesis by Wenting Yan, Sally Ohlsen and Emily Wood in British Journal of Occupational Therapy


Articles from The British Journal of Occupational Therapy are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES