Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1989 Jul;414:473–497. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017699

Acetylcholine-gated and chloride conductance channel expression in rat muscle membrane.

R D Heathcote 1
PMCID: PMC1189153  PMID: 2481727

Abstract

1. During the differentiation of skeletal muscle, there is a synchronized expression of a number of muscle-specific proteins including the acetylcholine-gated ion channel (AChR). Another muscle-specific ion channel, responsible for chloride conductance, was shown to be expressed in an anticoordinate fashion to AChR. An organ culture system for rat lumbrical muscles was developed to manipulate the expression of these two ion channels. 2. Denervation induced a change in expression of both channels that was mimicked in culture and reversed by direct electrical stimulation. 3. The time course of the disappearance of both channels was similar and started immediately after denervation (chloride conductance) or stimulation (AChR). The time course of the appearance of AChR was delayed several days after denervation and culture but chloride conductance increased immediately upon stimulation. 4. The loss of chloride conductance in muscle cultured in cycloheximide exhibited first-order kinetics, providing an estimate of the half-life (2.3 days) for the chloride conductance channel. This resembled the disappearance of chloride conductance in normal medium, suggesting that synthesis of this channel ceases following denervation. The decrease in chloride conductance characteristic of denervated muscle was not halted by cycloheximide. 5. Changes in chloride conductance presumably alter the intracellular concentration of chloride. The possibility that chloride might regulate the expression of AChRs in skeletal muscle was tested by altering the intracellular concentration of chloride in muscles maintained in organ culture. 6. Denervated muscles, whose intracellular concentration of chloride is elevated, were cultured in medium containing 9 mM-chloride (low-Cl- medium). AChR expression was reduced by either low-Cl- medium or electrical stimulation. Together, low-Cl- medium and electrical stimulation reduced expression more than either treatment alone. 7. The loss of AChRs in low-Cl- medium was blocked when muscle fibrillation was halted by TTX. 8. When chloride conductance was blocked by 9AC (9-anthracene carboxylic acid) intracellular chloride was elevated to the levels seen in denervated muscle. The elevated levels of chloride did not prevent the reduction in AChR expression induced by electrical stimulation. 9. The uncoupling of AChR expression and the intracellular concentration of chloride showed that they were not rigidly linked. Chloride affects the expression of AChR indirectly, by altering the activity of muscle cells.

Full text

PDF
473

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AXELSSON J., THESLEFF S. A study of supersensitivity in denervated mammalian skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1959 Jun 23;147(1):178–193. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Angelides K. J. Fluorescently labelled Na+ channels are localized and immobilized to synapses of innervated muscle fibres. Nature. 1986 May 1;321(6065):63–66. doi: 10.1038/321063a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beam K. G., Caldwell J. H., Campbell D. T. Na channels in skeletal muscle concentrated near the neuromuscular junction. Nature. 1985 Feb 14;313(6003):588–590. doi: 10.1038/313588a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg D. K., Kelly R. B., Sargent P. B., Williamson P., Hall Z. W. Binding of -bungarotoxin to acetylcholine receptors in mammalian muscle (snake venom-denervated muscle-neonatal muscle-rat diaphragm-SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):147–151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Betz H., Changeux J. P. Regulation of muscle acetylcholine receptor synthesis in vitro by cyclic nucleotide derivatives. Nature. 1979 Apr 19;278(5706):749–752. doi: 10.1038/278749a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Betz W. J., Caldwell J. H., Kinnamon S. C. Physiological basis of a steady endogenous current in rat lumbrical muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1984 Feb;83(2):175–192. doi: 10.1085/jgp.83.2.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Birnbaum M., Reis M. A., Shainberg A. Role of calcium in the regulation of acetylcholine receptor synthese in cultured muscle cells*. Pflugers Arch. 1980 May;385(1):37–43. doi: 10.1007/BF00583913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blatz A. L., Magleby K. L. Quantitative description of three modes of activity of fast chloride channels from rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1986 Sep;378:141–174. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blatz A. L., Magleby K. L. Single chloride-selective channels active at resting membrane potentials in cultured rat skeletal muscle. Biophys J. 1985 Jan;47(1):119–123. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83884-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blosser J. C., Appel S. H. Regulation of acetylcholine receptor by cyclic AMP. J Biol Chem. 1980 Feb 25;255(4):1235–1238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brevet A., Pinto E., Peacock J., Stockdale F. E. Myosin synthesis increased by electrical stimulation of skeletal muscle cell cultures. Science. 1976 Sep 17;193(4258):1152–1154. doi: 10.1126/science.959833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bryant S. H., Morales-Aguilera A. Chloride conductance in normal and myotonic muscle fibres and the action of monocarboxylic aromatic acids. J Physiol. 1971 Dec;219(2):367–383. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Camerino D., Bryant S. H. Effects of denervation and colchicine treatment on the chloride conductance of rat skeletal muscle fibers. J Neurobiol. 1976 May;7(3):221–228. doi: 10.1002/neu.480070305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carlin B. E., Lawrence J. C., Jr, Lindstrom J. M., Merlie J. P. Inhibition of acetylcholine receptor assembly by activity in primary cultures of embryonic rat muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1986 Apr 15;261(11):5180–5186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen S. A., Fischbach G. D. Regulation of muscle acetylcholine sensitivity by muscle activity in cell culture. Science. 1973 Jul 6;181(4094):76–78. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4094.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Devlin R. B., Emerson C. P., Jr Coordinate regulation of contractile protein synthesis during myoblast differentiation. Cell. 1978 Apr;13(4):599–611. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90211-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Devore D. I., Nastuk W. L. Ionophore-mediated calcium influx effects on the post-synaptic muscle fibre membrane. Nature. 1977 Dec 1;270(5636):441–443. doi: 10.1038/270441a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Endo T., Nadal-Ginard B. Three types of muscle-specific gene expression in fusion-blocked rat skeletal muscle cells: translational control in EGTA-treated cells. Cell. 1987 May 22;49(4):515–526. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90454-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fambrough D. M. Acetylcholine sensitivity of muscle fiber membranes: mechanism of regulation by motoneurons. Science. 1970 Apr 17;168(3929):372–373. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3929.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fambrough D. M. Control of acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 1979 Jan;59(1):165–227. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fambrough D., Rash J. E. Development of acetylcholine sensitivity during myogenesis. Dev Biol. 1971 Sep;26(1):55–68. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(71)90107-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fontaine B., Klarsfeld A., Changeux J. P. Calcitonin gene-related peptide and muscle activity regulate acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunit mRNA levels by distinct intracellular pathways. J Cell Biol. 1987 Sep;105(3):1337–1342. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.3.1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Forrest J. W., Mills R. G., Bray J. J., Hubbard J. I. Calcium-dependent regulation of the membrane potential and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors of rat skeletal muscle. Neuroscience. 1981;6(4):741–749. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(81)90157-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gonoi T., Sherman S. J., Catterall W. A. Voltage clamp analysis of tetrodotoxin-sensitive and -insensitive sodium channels in rat muscle cells developing in vitro. J Neurosci. 1985 Sep;5(9):2559–2564. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-09-02559.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grampp W., Harris J. B., Thesleff S. Inhibition of denervation changes in skeletal muscle by blockers of protein synthesis. J Physiol. 1972 Mar;221(3):743–754. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Greenberg M. E., Ziff E. B., Greene L. A. Stimulation of neuronal acetylcholine receptors induces rapid gene transcription. Science. 1986 Oct 3;234(4772):80–83. doi: 10.1126/science.3749894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:127–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hall Z. W., Reiness C. G. Electrical stimulation of denervated muscles reduces incorporation of methionine into the ACh receptor. Nature. 1977 Aug 18;268(5621):655–657. doi: 10.1038/268655a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Harris G. L., Betz W. J. Evidence for active chloride accumulation in normal and denervated rat lumbrical muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1987 Jul;90(1):127–144. doi: 10.1085/jgp.90.1.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Harris J. B., Marshall M. W. Tetrodotoxin-resistant action potentials in newborn rat muscle. Nat New Biol. 1973 Jun 6;243(127):191–192. doi: 10.1038/newbio243191a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hogan P. G., Marshall J. M., Hall Z. W. Muscle activity decreases rate of degradation of alpha-bungarotoxin bound to extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors. Nature. 1976 May 27;261(5558):328–330. doi: 10.1038/261328a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kallo J. R., Steinhardt R. A. The regulation of extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors in the denervated rat diaphragm muscle in culture. J Physiol. 1983 Nov;344:433–452. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kidokoro Y. Developmental changes of membrane electrical properties in a rat skeletal muscle cell line. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(1):129–143. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kinnamon S. C., Betz W. J., Caldwell J. H. Development of a steady electric current in neonatal rat lumbrical muscle. Dev Biol. 1985 Nov;112(1):241–247. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90138-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Klarsfeld A., Changeux J. P. Activity regulates the levels of acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunit mRNA in cultured chicken myotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(13):4558–4562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.13.4558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Knaack D., Podleski T. Ascorbic acid mediates acetylcholine receptor increase induced by brain extract on myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):575–579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Leff S. E., Rosenfeld M. G., Evans R. M. Complex transcriptional units: diversity in gene expression by alternative RNA processing. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:1091–1117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Linden D. C., Fambrough D. M. Biosynthesis and degradation of acetylcholine receptors in rat skeletal muscles. Effects of electrical stimulation. Neuroscience. 1979;4(4):527–538. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(79)90129-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lomo T., Rosenthal J. Control of ACh sensitivity by muscle activity in the rat. J Physiol. 1972 Mar;221(2):493–513. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lomo T., Westgaard R. H. Further studies on the control of ACh sensitivity by muscle activity in the rat. J Physiol. 1975 Nov;252(3):603–626. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lorković H., Tomanek R. J. Potassium and chloride conductances in normal and denervated rat muscles. Am J Physiol. 1977 Mar;232(3):C109–C114. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1977.232.3.C109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. MILEDI R. Junctional and extra-junctional acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1960 Apr;151:24–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Merlie J. P., Isenberg K. E., Russell S. D., Sanes J. R. Denervation supersensitivity in skeletal muscle: analysis with a cloned cDNA probe. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 1):332–335. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Miledi R., Potter L. T. Acetylcholine receptors in muscle fibres. Nature. 1971 Oct 29;233(5322):599–603. doi: 10.1038/233599a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Morgan J. I., Curran T. Role of ion flux in the control of c-fos expression. Nature. 1986 Aug 7;322(6079):552–555. doi: 10.1038/322552a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. New H. V., Mudge A. W. Calcitonin gene-related peptide regulates muscle acetylcholine receptor synthesis. 1986 Oct 30-Nov 5Nature. 323(6091):809–811. doi: 10.1038/323809a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Olson E. N., Glaser L., Merlie J. P., Sebanne R., Lindstrom J. Regulation of surface expression of acetylcholine receptors in response to serum and cell growth in the BC3H1 muscle cell line. J Biol Chem. 1983 Nov 25;258(22):13946–13953. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Palade P. T., Barchi R. L. On the inhibition of muscle membrane chloride conductance by aromatic carboxylic acids. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Jun;69(6):879–896. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.6.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pezzementi L., Schmidt J. Rapid modulation of acetylcholine receptor synthesis. FEBS Lett. 1981 Nov 30;135(1):103–106. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(81)80953-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pezzementi L., Schmidt J. Ryanodine alters the rate of acetylcholine receptor synthesis in chick skeletal muscle cell cultures. J Biol Chem. 1981 Dec 25;256(24):12651–12654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Powell J. A., Friedman B., Cossi A. Tissue culture study of murine muscular dysgenesis: role of spontaneous action potential generation in the regulation of muscle maturation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1979;317:550–570. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1979.tb56576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Prives J., Silman I., Amsterdam A. Appearance and disappearance of acetycholine receptor during differentiation of chick skeletal muscle in vitro. Cell. 1976 Apr;7(4):543–550. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90204-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Purves D., Sakmann B. Membrane properties underlying spontaneous activity of denervated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1974 May;239(1):125–153. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Redfern P., Thesleff S. Action potential generation in denervated rat skeletal muscle. II. The action of tetrodotoxin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 May;82(1):70–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1971.tb04943.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ritchie A. K., Fambrough D. M. Electrophysiological properties of the membrane and acetylcholine receptor in developing rat and chick myotubes. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Sep;66(3):327–355. doi: 10.1085/jgp.66.3.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sakmann B. Reappearance of extrajunctional acetylcholine sensitivity in denervated rat muscle after blockage with alpha-bungarotoxin. Nature. 1975 May 29;255(5507):415–416. doi: 10.1038/255415a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Schmitt P., Gattoni R., Keohavong P., Stévenin J. Alternative splicing of E1A transcripts of adenovirus requires appropriate ionic conditions in vitro. Cell. 1987 Jul 3;50(1):31–39. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90659-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schubert D., LaCorbiere M., Whitlock C., Stallcup W. Alterations in the surface properties of cells responsive to nerve growth factor. Nature. 1978 Jun 29;273(5665):718–723. doi: 10.1038/273718a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Shainberg A., Brik H. The appearance of acetylcholine receptors triggered by fusion of myoblasts in vitro. FEBS Lett. 1978 Apr 15;88(2):327–331. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(78)80204-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shainberg A., Burstein M. Decrease of acetylcholine receptor synthesis in muscle cultures by electrical stimulation. Nature. 1976 Nov 25;264(5584):368–369. doi: 10.1038/264368a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shainberg A., Cohen S. A., Nelson P. G. Induction of acetylcholine receptors in muscle cultures. Pflugers Arch. 1976 Feb 24;361(3):255–261. doi: 10.1007/BF00587290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Shieh B. H., Pezzementi L., Schmidt J. Extracellular potassium and the regulation of acetylcholine receptor synthesis in embryonic chick muscle cells. Brain Res. 1983 Mar 21;263(2):259–265. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90318-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Steinbach J. H. Role of muscle activity in nerve-muscle interaction in vitro. Nature. 1974 Mar 1;248(5443):70–71. doi: 10.1038/248070a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. TROWELL O. A. The culture of mature organs in a synthetic medium. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Jan;16(1):118–147. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90201-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Walker C. R., Wilson B. W. Control of acetylcholinesterase by contractile activity of cultured muscle cells. Nature. 1975 Jul 17;256(5514):215–216. doi: 10.1038/256215a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Westgaard R. H. Influence of activity on the passive electrical properties of denervated soleus muscle fibres in the rat. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(3):683–697. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES