Abstract
Objective
To further understand spatial relationships of common carotid arteries to adjacent structures through evaluation of computed tomographic angiograms in dogs.
Animals
24 pet dogs.
Procedure
A database was searched for triplanar computed tomographic angiograms that included the heart base caudally and the 5th cervical vertebra cranially, without macroscopic abnormalities. Measurements included brachiocephalic trunk length, common carotid arteries’ position relative to the trachea, transverse (axial) thoracic height and width, manubrium length, and length of the 7th cervical vertebra (C7).
Results
Measurements (mean + SD) included brachiocephalic trunk length = 3.65 ± 1.34 cm (n = 24), mean thoracic inlet height = 6.51 ± 2.03 cm (n = 23), mean thoracic inlet width = 4.69 ± 1.35 cm (n = 20), mean manubrium length = 3.52 ± 1.15 cm (n = 22), and mean length of C7 = 1.93 ± 0.46 cm (n = 23).
Conclusion
Some or all measurements were feasible in all dogs. Understanding interindividual variation in spatial relationships is pertinent to differentiating normal from abnormal, for surgical planning, and possibly for elucidating the pathogenesis of certain disorders.
Clinical relevance
It is possible to obtain these measurements in dogs. This technique could be applied to subgroups of dogs (e.g., breeds) and dogs with cervical or thoracic abnormalities.
RÉSUMÉ
Étude angiographique par tomodensitométrie des relations anatomiques de l’artère carotide commune chez le chien
Objectif
Mieux comprendre les relations spatiales des artères carotides communes avec les structures adjacentes grâce à l’évaluation des angiogrammes par tomodensitométrie chez les chiens.
Animaux
24 chiens de compagnie.
Procédure
Une recherche a été effectuée dans une base de données pour trouver des angiogrammes par tomodensitométrie triplanaire incluant la base du cœur caudalement et la 5e vertèbre cervicale crânialement, sans anomalies macroscopiques. Les mesures comprenaient la longueur du tronc brachiocéphalique, la position des artères carotides communes par rapport à la trachée, la hauteur et la largeur thoraciques transversales (axiales), la longueur du manubrium et la longueur de la 7e vertèbre cervicale (C7).
Résultats
Les mesures (moyenne ± écart type) comprenaient la longueur du tronc brachiocéphalique = 3,65 ± 1,34 cm (n = 24), la hauteur moyenne de l’entrée thoracique = 6,51 ± 2,03 cm (n = 23), la largeur moyenne de l’entrée thoracique = 4,69 ± 1,35 cm (n = 20), longueur moyenne du manubrium = 3,52 ± 1,15 cm (n = 22) et longueur moyenne de C7 = 1,93 ± 0,46 cm (n = 23).
Conclusion
Certaines ou toutes les mesures étaient réalisables chez tous les chiens. La compréhension des variations interindividuelles dans les relations spatiales est importante pour différencier le normal de l’anormal, pour la planification chirurgicale et éventuellement pour élucider la pathogenèse de certains problèmes.
Pertinence clinique
Il est possible d’obtenir ces mesures chez le chien. Cette technique pourrait être appliquée à des sous-groupes de chiens (par exemple, des races) et à des chiens présentant des anomalies cervicales ou thoraciques.
(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier)
INTRODUCTION
The positions of the common carotid arteries through the neck of the dog and their relationships to adjacent structures are usually described as being uniform in the species (1). However, some descriptions exist of breed- or somatotype-associated variants. For example, the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) of dogs is described as being “approximately 4 cm long and 8 mm in diameter” (1). The branching pattern of the vessels off the aortic arch in dogs, from right to left, is typically described as BCT [branching into the right common carotid (RCC), left common carotid (LCC), and right subclavian arteries] and left subclavian artery (1). However, additional work identified interindividual variation in the origin and branching patterns of these vessels (2–5). Common carotid arteries originate from the same point on the BCT in 68% of dogs, from different points on the BCT in 29% of dogs, and from a common, bicarotid trunk that arises from the BCT in 3% of dogs (4). In German shepherd dogs, a similar variety of morphologies exists, with some investigators dividing the bicarotid trunk group into 2 subgroups (2). A bicarotid trunk is commonly identified in dogs with a concurrent persistent right aortic arch (e.g., 17/21, 81%) but only occasionally identified in dogs without a persistent right aortic arch (e.g., 1/192, 0.5%) (5). Overall, such findings have been obtained either with macroscopic dissection of dog cadavers (1–3,6) or using computed tomographic angiography on anesthetized dogs (4,5,7,8).
Few studies of dogs have addressed spatial relationships of the common carotid arteries to adjacent thoracic and cervical structures. In 1 case study, investigators utilized computed tomographic angiography pre- and postoperatively to assess morphology of vessels where they crossed through the thoracic inlet (8). The location at which common carotid arteries are directly lateral to the trachea, associations with thoracic inlet height and width, and length of the BCT compared to skeletal structures as points of reference, have apparently not been described. Carotid arteries have been identified coursing ventrally along the malformed trachea in dogs with tracheal malformations and sometimes within the ventral tracheal groove that is characteristic of tracheal malformation. Vessel/nerve tension or thoracic inlet narrowing along soft, developing tracheal cartilage has been hypothesized as a possible cause for tracheal malformation generation; however, this is currently only a hypothesis (Chick Weisse, Schwarzman Animal Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; personal communication, 2024). Greater understanding of these spatial relationships could improve diagnosis of pathologic malformations of the vasculature, interventional treatment selection (9), and surgical planning (8) — and could offer insights into the pathogenesis of such disorders as tracheal malformation (9,10).
The objective of this study was to evaluate computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) to quantify spatial relationships between common carotid arteries and adjacent cervical and thoracic structures. We hypothesized that it is possible to i) make these measurements on the CTAs of normal dogs, and ii) index these measurements to reference points in the dog.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
A convenience sample was obtained by searching the Atlantic Veterinary College (Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island) Radiology archive for dogs that underwent simultaneous cervical and thoracic computed tomographic angiography (Aquilion 64; Canon, Otawara, Japan). The CTAs that were used had been obtained between July 2, 2020 and June 17, 2022.
Computed tomographic angiography protocol
Each dog was induced and maintained under general anesthesia while endotracheally intubated. The dog was positioned in sternal recumbency with the head facing the CT aperture. In addition, each dog had physical restraint by means of foam wedges and troughs, sandbags, and hook-and-loop straps attached to the table. Images were acquired during breath-hold sequences without contrast, and then after IV administration of iohexol (Omnipaque, 240 mg iodine/mL; GE Healthcare Canada, Mississauga, Ontario), 2.5 mL/kg, administered through a peripheral IV catheter.
Analysis of images
Exclusionary criteria were absence of images that included the heart base at the caudal extent of the CTA, absence of images that included the complete 5th cervical vertebra (C5) at the cranial extent of the CTA, and presence of cervical or intrathoracic abnormalities on CTA. Before making measurements, the investigators used CTA images from 10 dogs from a previous study (11) to establish variables to measure in the current study and to refine measurement parameters. All CTA images were assessed using open-source software (https://horosproject.org). Variables and parameters for their measurements are in Table 1. The lengths of the 7th cervical vertebra (C7) and of the manubrium were measured as reference points to calculate ratios with vascular structures; this was done to explore indexing measurements to account for differences in body size.
TABLE 1.
Variables and parameters for measuring them on computed tomographic angiograms of normal dogs.
| Variable | Parameter: Definition | Parameter: Method |
|---|---|---|
| BCT length (Figure 1) | Distance between origin of the BCT off the aortic arch caudally and origin of the RCC, LCC, or bicarotid trunk cranially |
|
| Thoracic inlet height (Figure 2) | Greatest distance between dorsal aspect of manubrium and corresponding ventral aspect of T1 |
|
| Thoracic inlet width (Figure 2) | Greatest distance between medial aspects of contralateral 1st ribs on a transverse axial image | As for thoracic inlet height, but measuring the greatest distance in a lateral plane (width) between the medial surfaces of the 2 1st ribs. |
| Intercarotid distance (Figure 3) | Distance between RCC and LCC at level of RCC origin |
|
| Carotid artery positions lateral to trachea (Figures 4, 5) | Cervical vertebra corresponding to transverse (axial) image where LCC is directly lateral to the left of the trachea and where RCC is directly lateral to the right of the trachea |
|
| Carotid artery or BCT position ventral to trachea (Figure 6) | Cervical vertebra where BCT or RCC is directly ventral to the trachea | As for carotid artery positions lateral to trachea, but using the transverse (axial) image where the BCT or RCC is ventralmost to the trachea (6 o’clock position). |
| Length of manubrium (Figure 7) | Length of manubrium | On midline median (sagittal) image, measure greatest length of 1st sternebra. |
| C7 length (Figure 7) | Length of 7th cervical vertebra | On midline median (sagittal) image, measure greatest length of body of 7th cervical vertebra (floor of vertebral canal). |
BCT — Brachiocephalic trunk; LCC — Left common carotid artery; MPR — Multiplanar reformation; RCC — Right common carotid artery; T1 — 1st thoracic vertebral body.
Measurements were obtained using 2D multiplanar reformation (MPR) and the software’s length measurement function. The bone setting was used for measuring bony structures and the abdomen setting for measuring contrast-filled vascular structures. Additional features of the software, including 3D image rendering and 3D MPR, were used as needed to increase the precision and accuracy of measurements through confirmation of the points of origin of vessels, enhancement of visualization of the course of vessels, and confirmation of the reference vertebra as C7.
Statistical methods
Data were analyzed using commercial software (GraphPad Prism 10.2.2; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA). Analysis for normality was done using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed data are reported as mean ± SD. Non-normally distributed data are reported as median (range). Investigation of correlations between variables was established a priori and was done using Pearson correlation for normally distributed data or Spearman correlation for non-normally distributed data (both 2-tailed). For vertebral lengths, results are shown to tenths of a vertebra, for precision. For localization using vertebral lengths as reference points, cervical vertebral lengths were treated numerically without the designation of “cervical” (e.g., C5.3 as 5.3 during statistical analysis). Similarly, thoracic vertebrae were treated numerically without the designation of “thoracic,” and as extensions of cervical vertebrae by extrapolation (e.g., T1.6 as 8.6 during statistical analysis). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, except for correlation analyses to which a Bonferroni correction was applied.
RESULTS
Of the 35 CTAs retrieved, 11 were excluded due to space-occupying masses (4), megaesophagus (1), esophageal perforation/tear (1), lack of contrast (2), inability to visualize the BCT (2), and a technical issue (missing images) (1). In the 24 dogs studied, some individual measurements could not be made for the following reasons: absence of parallel right and left 1st ribs in a transverse (axial) view (thoracic width, n = 4), oblique image of manubrium (length of manubrium, n = 2), image series did not reach sufficiently cranially (carotid artery position lateral to trachea (3 o’clock, n = 2), carotid artery position lateral to trachea (9 o’clock, n = 2), ill-defined margins of C7 (length of C7, n = 1), and oblique image of thoracic inlet (thoracic height, n = 1).
There were 13 males (10 castrated) and 11 females (9 spayed). On transverse (axial) images, the vessel directly ventral to the trachea was the RCC in 17 dogs (71%) and the BCT in 7 dogs (29%) (Tables 1, 2). No dog had a bicarotid trunk. Measurements and descriptive statistics are presented in Table 2 and correlation analyses in Table 3. After Bonferroni correction for 18 analyses, only the association between BCT length and weight remained significant.
TABLE 2.
Measurements of variables on computed tomographic angiograms of normal dogs.
| Variable | Mean ± SD or median (range) | Number of dogs |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg) | 21.5 ± 12.3 | 24 |
| Length of BCT (cm) | 3.65 ± 1.34 | 24 |
| BCT length/C7 | 1.92 ± 0.35 | 23 |
| BCT length/manubrium length | 1.06 ± 0.26 | 22 |
| Thoracic inlet height (cm) | 6.51 ± 2.03 | 23 |
| Thoracic inlet width (cm) | 4.69 ± 1.35 | 20 |
| Thoracic inlet height:width | 1.38 ± 0.21 | 20 |
| Intercarotid distance (mm) | 0.57 (< 1 to 8.1) | 24 |
| LCC position lateral to trachea (3 o’clock) (vertebra) | C5.5 ± 1 | 22 |
| RCC position lateral to trachea (9 o’clock) (vertebra) | C5.8 ± 0.78 | 22 |
| Artery position (BCT or RCC) ventral to trachea (6 o’clock) (vertebra) | T1.1 ± 0.75 | 24 |
| Length of C7 (cm) | 1.93 ± 0.46 | 23 |
| Length of manubrium (cm) | 3.52 ± 1.15 | 22 |
BCT — Brachiocephalic trunk; C7 — 7th cervical vertebra; LCC — Left common carotid artery; RCC — Right common carotid artery.
Results reported as mean ± SD if normally distributed and median (range) if non-normally distributed.
TABLE 3.
Correlation analyses between various variables for computed tomographic angiograms of normal dogs.
| IV | DV | r | 95% CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCT length | Weight | 0.82 | 0.62 to 0.92 | < 0.0001 |
| BCT length/C7 length | Weight | 0.37 | −0.05 to 0.68 | 0.08 |
| BCT length/manubrium length | Weight | 0.15 | −0.29 to 0.54 | 0.5 |
| LCC @ 3 o’clock | BCT length | −0.16 | −0.54 to 0.28 | 0.48 |
| RCC or BCT @ 6 o’clock | BCT length | 0.16 | −0.26 to 0.53 | 0.46 |
| RCC @ 9 o’clock | BCT length | −0.2 | −0.57 to 0.25 | 0.38 |
| LCC @ 3 o’clock | Weight | −0.25 | −0.61 to 0.19 | 0.26 |
| RCC or BCT @ 6 o’clock | Weight | 0.007 | −0.4 to 0.41 | 0.97 |
| RCC @ 9 o’clock | Weight | −0.14 | −0.53 to 0.3 | 0.54 |
| Thoracic inlet height:width | Weight | 0.02 | −0.42 to 0.46 | 0.93 |
| Thoracic inlet height:width | BCT length | 0.23 | −0.23 to 0.61 | 0.33 |
| Intercarotid distance | Weight | 0.13 | −0.3 to 0.51 | 0.56 |
| Intercarotid distance | BCT length | 0.34 | −0.09 to 0.66 | 0.11 |
| Intercarotid distance | BCT length/C7 length | 0.42 | −0.005 to 0.71 | 0.047 |
| Intercarotid distance | BCT length/manubrium length | 0.52 | 0.11 to 0.78 | 0.013 |
| Intercarotid distance | LCC @ 3 o’clock | 0.1 | −0.35 to 0.51 | 0.67 |
| Intercarotid distance | RCC or BCT @ 6 o’clock | 0.04 | −0.38 to 0.45 | 0.86 |
| Intercarotid distance | RCC @ 9 o’clock | −0.12 | −0.52 to 0.33 | 0.61 |
BCT — Brachiocephalic trunk; CI — Confidence interval; C7 — 7th cervical vertebra; DV — Dependent variable; IV — Independent variable; LCC — Left common carotid artery; RCC — Right common carotid artery; 3 o’clock — LCC position directly left-lateral to trachea on transverse (axial) image; 6 o’clock — RCC or BCT position directly ventral to trachea on transverse (axial) image; 9 o’clock — RCC position directly right-lateral to trachea on transverse (axial) image.
Boldface font indicates statistical significance.
DISCUSSION
This study presented a novel method for assessing spatial relationships of the BCT and common carotid arteries not using cadavers. Measurement of all variables was feasible in most dogs. Inability to measure certain variables in some dogs, such as LCC position lateral to trachea (9 o’clock) or thoracic inlet width, were related to technical issues such as cranial extent of acquisition of images or patient positioning, respectively. Such issues can be addressed proactively at the time computed tomographic angiography is done if the present variables are intended to be acquired and measured, or through 3D reconstruction of CTAs.
Although the BCT is broadly described as being ~4 cm long in dogs (1), there was a strong correlation between BCT length and body weight. Therefore, a single value for BCT length is not expected to be accurate for dogs of all body weights.
Quantitative information on the origin and course of the common carotid arteries was obtained from CTAs of dogs using the methods of this study. The RCC and LCC origins on the BCT were separated by a distance that varied widely among individuals and was not correlated to body weight. When examining the course of the common carotid arteries from caudal to cranial, both the RCC and LCC first were directly lateral to the trachea at approximately the level of C5 in most dogs. The artery (BCT, RCC, or LCC) that first appeared directly ventral to the trachea when proceeding from caudal to cranial differed among dogs. Indexing BCT length to length of the manubrium or of C7 reduced the influence of body weight on BCT length. Such indexing could be evaluated further as part of developing reference intervals for BCT length that apply to dogs of various body weights. The RCC origin on the BCT was noted to occur at the level of the 1st rib (1), and similarly, the present study identified the level of the 1st thoracic vertebra as the mean position of the origin of the RCC. Together, these findings increased the feasibility of quantitatively assessing BCT and common carotid artery structure and course in CTAs of healthy dogs. The feasibility of this approach means that formal validation can be undertaken.
Some limitations could be attributed to the retrospective nature of this study. Many CTAs could not be included because they imaged the neck or the thorax, but not both. This selection bias reduced the number of cases simply because protocols were applied for computed tomographic angiography of the anatomic region of interest.
Positioning during imaging differed among dogs. In 4 dogs, this meant that thoracic inlet width could not be measured, and thoracic inlet height:width could not be calculated, because the right and left 1st ribs could not be visualized on the same transverse (axial) images. Three-dimensional reconstruction could be applied to circumvent this, and similar limitations, in the future.
The mean body weight of dogs in this study was higher than the typical body weight of dogs with tracheal malformation or tracheal collapse. This difference would limit the extent to which the present results can be applied to dogs with such tracheal diseases.
In conclusion, it was feasible to obtain measurements involving the common carotid arteries and BCT of dogs on CTAs. These findings could have clinical implications for surgical planning and for understanding embryogenesis of disorders of the vasculature in the necks of dogs.
FIGURE 1.
Brachiocephalic trunk length in a dog.
FIGURE 2.
Thoracic inlet height (A) and width (B) in a dog.
FIGURE 3.
Intercarotid distance in a dog.
FIGURE 4.
Transverse (left image), dorsal (center image), and median (right image) plane views demonstrating the left common carotid artery at the left lateralmost (3 o’clock) position relative to the trachea (short arrow) in the dog. Using multiplanar reformation, the transverse image is identified as corresponding to vertebral level C5.5 (long arrow).
FIGURE 5.
Transverse (left image), dorsal (center image), and median (right image) plane views demonstrating the right common carotid artery at the right lateralmost (9 o’clock) position relative to the trachea (short arrow) in the dog. Using multiplanar reformation, the transverse image is identified as corresponding to vertebral level C6.1 (long arrow).
FIGURE 6.
Transverse (left image), dorsal (center image), and median (right image) plane views demonstrating the brachiocephalic trunk as the first major artery to be apparent directly ventral to the trachea (6 o’clock position) when scrolling from the heart base cranially (short arrow) in the dog. Using multiplanar reformation, the transverse image is identified as corresponding to vertebral level C7.9 (long arrow).
FIGURE 7.
Measured lengths of the 7th cervical vertebra (A) and manubrium (B) in the dog.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Rob De Wolfe, Section of Radiology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, for technical support with image retrieval; and Dr. Glenda Wright, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, for comments on embryogenesis of the aortic arch and its branches in dogs. CVJ
Funding Statement
Generous funding was provided by the Ptarmigan Foundation and by the Atlantic Veterinary College — University of Prince Edward Island Student Research and Leadership Program.
Footnotes
Preliminary results were presented in abstract form at the National Veterinary Student Scholars Symposium, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, August 5 and 6, 2022.
Generous funding was provided by the Ptarmigan Foundation and by the Atlantic Veterinary College — University of Prince Edward Island Student Research and Leadership Program.
Copyright is held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association. Individuals interested in obtaining reproductions of this article or permission to use this material elsewhere should contact permissions@cvma-acmv.org.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hermanson JW, de Lahunta A, Evans HE. The heart and arteries. In: Hermanson JW, de Lahunta A, Evans HE, editors. Miller and Evans’ Anatomy of the Dog. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Elsevier; 2020. pp. 495–581. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ahn D-C, Tae H-J, Kim I-S. Morphological patterns of the origin of the common carotid artery in German shepherd dogs. Indian Vet J. 2020;87:587–590. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim IS, Yang HH, Tae HJ, et al. Branching patterns of the subclavian arteries in German shepherd dogs. Anat Histol Embryol. 2010;39:529–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2010.01025.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sebastian-Marcos P, Fonfara S, Borgeat K, et al. Anatomical anomalies and variations of main thoracic vessels in dogs: A computed tomography study. J Vet Cardiol. 2019;21:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2018.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schorn C, Hildebrandt N, Schneider M, et al. Anomalies of the aortic arch in dogs: Evaluation with the use of multidetector computed tomography angiography and proposal of an extended classification scheme. BMC Vet Res. 2021;17:387. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-03101-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee E, Jang YJ, Kim IS, et al. Morphology of the aortic arch branching pattern in raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides, Gray, 1834) J Vet Sci. 2024;25:e32. doi: 10.4142/jvs.23305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shua-Haim T, Vilaplana Grosso FR, Suarez Fuentes D, et al. Computed tomographic features of double aortic arch in six dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2023;64:669–676. doi: 10.1111/vru.13257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mochizuki Y, Mikawa S, Kutara K, et al. Local hemodynamic changes immediately after correction of an aberrant right subclavian artery in a dog: A contrast computed tomographic study. Vet Sci. 2021;8:104. doi: 10.3390/vetsci8060104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weisse C, Berent A, Violette N, et al. Short-, intermediate-, and long-term results for endoluminal stent placement in dogs with tracheal collapse. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019;254:380–392. doi: 10.2460/javma.254.3.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weisse C. Insights in tracheobronchial stenting and a theory of bronchial compression. J Small An Pract. 2014;55:181–184. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Côté E, Weisse C, Lamb K, Tozier E. Computed tomographic assessment of principal bronchial anatomy in dogs of various thoracic conformations: 93 cases (2012–2017) J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2022;260:1–10. doi: 10.2460/javma.20.12.0716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







