Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Feb 24;16(9):2273–2282. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00136

Organelle-Specific Thiochromenocarbazole Imide Derivative as a Heavy-Atom-Free Type I Photosensitizer for Biomolecule-Triggered Image-Guided Photodynamic Therapy

Karolina Saczuk , Ahmad Kassem , Marta Dudek , Darío Puchán Sánchez , Lhoussain Khrouz §, Magali Allain , Gregory C Welch , Nasim Sabouri , Cyrille Monnereau §, Pierre Josse ‡,*, Clément Cabanetos ‡,*, Marco Deiana †,⊥,*
PMCID: PMC11891978  PMID: 39988904

Abstract

graphic file with name jz5c00136_0008.jpg

Modern photodynamic therapy (PDT) demands next-generation photosensitizers (PSs) that overcome heavy-atom dependency and enhance efficacy beyond traditional, highly oxygen-dependent type II mechanisms. We introduce herein TCI-NH, as a thiochromenocarbazole imide derivative designed for type I photodynamic action. Upon light activation, TCI-NH efficiently favors superoxide (O2•–) and PS-centered radical formation instead of singlet oxygen (1O2) generation. Its high luminescence efficiency and selective localization in both the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria enable precise, image-guided PDT. Notably, interactions with biomolecules, such as serum albumin or DNA, enhance TCI-NH’s emission by up to 40-fold and amplify radical generation by up to 5-fold. With negligible dark toxicity, this results in ∼120 nM photocytotoxicity along with an impressive phototherapeutic index exceeding 200. Real-time live-cell imaging revealed rapid, light-triggered cytotoxicity characterized by apoptotic body formation and extensive cellular damage. With its small size, heavy-atom-free structure, exceptional, organelle specificity, and therapeutic efficacy, TCI-NH sets a new benchmark for anticancer type I PDT.


Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as a minimally invasive approach to selectively eradicate cancer cells while largely preserving healthy tissues.1,2 Its precision arises from two key principles: targeting light exclusively to the tumor area and utilizing a photosensitizer (PS) that preferentially accumulates in critical organelles of malignant cells.1,2 Once illuminated, the PS generates cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), restricting cellular damage to the desired region and enhancing therapeutic outcomes.1,2

PDT operates via two primary mechanisms named type I and type II. Traditionally, PDT has hinged on type II mechanisms, wherein excited PS molecules transfer energy directly to molecular oxygen (O2), producing singlet oxygen (1O2).3,4 Early efforts to boost 1O2 generation heavily relied on the use of large conjugated molecules (porphyrinoids) or the introduction of heavy atoms—halogens or transition metals—into the chromophore, thereby enhancing intersystem crossing (ISC) through spin–orbit coupling (SOC).2,5 Yet, while these modifications improved ROS formation, they also increased in dark toxicity, hindered metabolic clearance, involved complex synthesis processes, exhibited limited triplet lifetimes, and often compromised fluorescence.610 Collectively these drawbacks therefore limited their practical relevance for next-generation PDT.

In response, researchers have shifted their attention toward small organic and heavy-atom-free molecular systems developing inventive strategies to access triplet states without the conventional drawbacks.6,10 These approaches include utilizing spin–orbit charge-transfer intersystem crossing (SOCT-ISC) in orthogonal donor–acceptor (D–A) systems,1113 exploiting excitonic coupling to induce excited-state degeneracy and enhance the mixing of singlet and triplet wave functions,14,15 employing sulfur substitution (thionation) to tap into nonbonding orbitals,1618 or inducing torsional distortions (twisting-induced ISC) in π-conjugated frameworks.1921 A broad spectrum of structures—from anthracene22 and mono- (BTI)16 or dibenzothioxanthene imides (DBI)23,24 to BODIPY,22,25 coumarin,26 cyanine,27 imidazolium,28 naphthalimide,18 phenoxazine,29 and perylene30 derivatives—has emerged. Nonetheless, many of these designs aimed to optimize 1O2 photogeneration at the expense of fluorescence, which is crucial for real-time imaging and monitoring.16,18,30

Within this evolving landscape, crafting a next-generation PS demands a delicate balance: a heavy-atom-free platform that combines robust fluorescence, targeted organelle localization, and efficient ROS generation.31 To address this challenge, approaches based on type I mechanisms—which rely on electron transfer to generate radical species such as superoxide (O2•–), hydroxyl (OH), or hydroperoxyl (HOO)—appear to be advantageous alternatives.3234 Type I PSs typically offer broader therapeutic window and enhanced adaptability across various conditions, including those with limited oxygen availability.35 In this context, various design strategies have been employed to develop type I PSs.35 For instance, isolated3638 and aggregation-induced emission (AIE)3941 luminogens—with either uncharged or positively charged forms—as well as supramolecular self-assembled dyes42,43 responsive to guest interactions44 have been synthesized and characterized for type I photodynamic activity. However, some of these systems exhibit hybrid photodynamic mechanisms,36,38 often combining type I and type II pathways or incorporating additional effects such as photothermal activation.37 This mechanistic ambiguity complicates the interpretation of their photocytotoxicity, making it difficult to ascertain the exclusive contribution of the type I mechanism.

Moreover, several of these type I PSs possess extended chemical structures and high molecular weights,45,46 which diverge from the drug-like properties essential for clinical translation. Another concern is that some of these agents exhibit half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values under light irradiation in the 0.5–20 μM range, and some also show significant toxicity in the absence of light.36,39,40 These factors collectively constrain their phototherapeutic indices and limit their overall clinical potential.

Building on our previous studies on BTI-16 and DBI-based23,24 compounds (Figure 1, top panel), which demonstrated outstanding potential for Type I and Type II mechanisms, respectively, we introduce TCI-NH, a PS derived from the N-annulation process of BTI that exemplifies this new paradigm.47,48 Avoiding heavy-atom strategies, TCI-NH minimizes 1O2 formation while excelling at generating O2•– and PS-centered radicals through electron transfer/H-abstraction upon light irradiation. Moreover, it selectively localizes within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria—key organelles responsible for maintaining cellular homeostasis and orchestrating apoptosis.31 Notably, when TCI-NH coordinates with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or noncanonical DNA structures such as G-quadruplexes (G4s),49 both its fluorescence emission and O2•– generation are significantly enhanced. This synergy results in pronounced imaging capabilities, potent photocytotoxicity at nanomolar concentrations, negligible dark toxicity, and an outstanding phototherapeutic index. Furthermore, live-cell imaging reveal its rapid induction of cellular damage and apoptotic body formation, highlighting TCI-NH’s potential as a powerful, type I PS that integrates bright fluorescence, precise targeting, and robust radical generation. Taken together, these findings illuminate a promising new direction in PDT—one that transcends traditional limitations and embraces safer, more adaptable, and more efficacious treatments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Summary of the BTI-16 and DBI-derived23,24 structures introduced in previous reports and in the present work, along with their main photophysical features and therapeutic efficacy (top panel). IC50 values are derived from experiments conducted on HeLa cells. Synthetic route for the preparation of the target PS TCI-NH and the associated crystal structure (bottom panel).

TCI-NH, the simplest N-annulated BTI derivative featuring a fused, unsubstituted amine,47,48 was synthesized by revisiting the previously reported nitration conditions50 used to obtain BTI-NO2 (Figures S1–S6). These modified conditions enabled the direct and selective introduction of a nitro group in the bay position without the need for prior protection. As outlined in Figure 1 (bottom panel), the expected NO2–BTI was successfully isolated by replacing nitric acid with a mixture of sodium nitrite and sulfuric acid. A subsequent Cadogan cyclization afforded the target compound, which was crystallized by slow evaporation. X-ray diffraction then confirmed the structure of the resulting TCI-NH (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1).

The absorption and emission spectra, along with the photophysical properties of TCI-NH (excluding those involving biological templates or cellular studies, vide infra), were recorded in chloroform (CHCl3)—a solvent of moderate polarity that effectively solubilizes the compound while minimizing aggregation effects (Figure 2). Compared to previously reported data for BTI under similar conditions,16,50TCI-NH exhibited a bathochromic shift in its absorption maximum, observed at 480 nm compared to 455 nm for BTI (Table 1). In contrast, the emission maximum remained essentially unchanged at 510 nm for both BTI and TCI-NH.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

UV–vis absorption and emission spectra of TCI-NH in CHCl3.

Table 1. Photophysical, Biophysical, and Cell-Related Parameters of BTI and TCI-NH.

Cmp λmax/nm λem/nm τ/ns ΦFa ΦΔb IC50/nMc
BTI 455 510 7.5 0.99 0.01 279.0
TCI-NH 480 510 7.3 0.88 0.04 120.8
a

ΦF = measured using Coumarin-153 as reference (ΦF = 0.45 in MeOH).

b

ΦΔ = Measured using Phenalenone as reference (ΦΔ = 0.95 in CHCl3).

c

IC50 was determined in HeLa cells with excitation wavelength of 470 ± 22 nm and operating at an intensity of 27 mW/cm2 for 6 min.

Whereas BTI displays a fluorescence quantum yield, ΦF, approaching unity ∼0.99, TCI-NH showed a slightly reduced value ∼0.88 (Figure S7). This decrease is likely attributable to an increased contribution of ISC to the excited-state deactivation pathway, as reflected by an improvement in singlet oxygen quantum yield, ΦΔ (vide infra). Nonetheless, similar to BTI, TCI-NH exhibited a relatively long excited-state lifetime of 7.3 ns.

The outstanding emission properties of TCI-NH prompted us to investigate its intracellular distribution in live human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) (Figure 3). For biological experiments, TCI-NH was dissolved in DMSO to prepare a stock solution—leveraging DMSO’s ability to solubilize both hydrophobic and hydrophilic compounds, its miscibility with water and cell culture medium, and its low cytotoxicity in HeLa cells at concentrations ≤0.5% v/v.16,23,24 Cells were treated with 500 nM TCI-NH, incubated for 24 h, and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove unbound TCI-NH molecules. This incubation period was selected based on phototoxicity studies (vide infra) to precisely match the delay before illumination for photoinduced cell death, ensuring reproducible accumulation and localization patterns prior to irradiation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cellular localization of TCI-NH in HeLa cells. A-C) CLSM images showing the intracellular distribution of TCI-NH (500 nM, green fluorescence) in live HeLa cells after a 24-h incubation. Following treatment, cells were costained with the nuclear dye Hoechst 33342 (500 nM, blue fluorescence) and one of the following organelle-specific dyes (red fluorescence): Lyso-Tracker Red (100 nM, panel A), ER-Tracker Red (500 nM, panel B), or Mito-Tracker Red (100 nM, panel C). Scatter plots illustrate the quantification of colocalization between TCI-NH and each organelle stain, calculated using the PCC. Excitation and emission settings for fluorescence detection were 405/420–470 nm for Hoechst 33342, 480/495–560 nm for TCI-NH, 577/600–710 nm for Lyso-Tracker Red, 587/600–710 nm for ER-Tracker Red, and 580/590–715 nm for Mito-Tracker Red. Scale bars are 25 μm for main images and 10 μm for magnified views.

Under these conditions, TCI-NH primarily localized in the cytoplasm, where it formed discrete, highly emissive species (Figure 3, green channel). To gain deeper insight into its organelle-specific distribution, live HeLa cells were costained with four commercially available organelle-selective probes namely Hoechst 33342 (nuclei), ER-Tracker Red (ER), Lyso-Tracker Red (lysosomes), and Mito-Tracker Red (mitochondria). While negligible fluorescence overlap between TCI-NH and Hoechst 33342 confirmed a minimal nuclear uptake, the low Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) with Lyso-Tracker Red indicated limited lysosomal localization (Figure 3A).

In contrast, and as illustrated in Figure 3B–C, the green emission of TCI-NH displayed notable overlap with both ER-Tracker Red and Mito-Tracker Red signals, resulting in PCC values of 0.54 and 0.67, respectively. These data indicate that TCI-NH effectively accumulates in both the ER and mitochondria. Besides, TCI-NH exhibited intense, punctate fluorescent clusters in the cytoplasm that did not align with any of the tested organelle trackers. Such signals may correspond to lipid-rich vesicular structures, including multivesicular bodies (MVBs)51 and/or lipid droplets (LDs).52 Their presence somewhat reduced the measured PCC values since these compartments are not associated with either the ER or mitochondria.

Building on the pronounced fluorescence emission of TCI-NH in both the ER and mitochondria, we next investigated how its interactions with cellular biomolecules might influence its subcellular localization. These organelles are not only enriched in proteins but, in the case of mitochondria, also contain their own genetic material (mtDNA), which is notably guanine-rich and to forming G4 structures5355—motifs that have attracted considerable attention as potential anticancer targets,49,56 and have been shown our previous work to strongly interact with other BTI derivatives.23 To probe the potential influence of these biomolecules, we performed fluorescence titration binding experiments using BSA as a model protein,18,33 along with three major types of DNA structures, double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), and G4 DNA (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Fluorescence titration binding studies. A-C) Fluorescence spectral changes of TCI-NH (2.5 μM) with increasing BSA concentrations (0 to 15 μM), accompanied by the corresponding 2:1 binding isotherm and a schematic illustration depicting TCI-NH accommodated within the hydrophobic pocket of BSA (PDB: 4OR0). D-F) Fluorescence spectral changes of TCI-NH (2.5 μM) with increasing G4 DNA concentrations (0 to 15 μM), along with the associated 1:1 binding isotherm and a schematic representation showing TCI-NH binding to the external tetrad end of the G4 structure (PDB: 1XAV). G-H) Fluorescence titration studies demonstrating that TCI-NH does not form complexes with dsDNA (G) or ssDNA (H). All the experiments were carried out in 50 mM Tris-phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) supplemented with 100 mM KCl at 25 °C.

In a buffered aqueous solution, TCI-NH exhibited only a weak emission with a maximum at approximately 580 nm, strongly red-shifted compared to data in CHCl3 solutions (510 nm), likely due to the formation of molecular aggregates.16,18,57 Addition of BSA led a pronounced ∼40-fold fluorescence enhancement and a ∼50 nm blue shift, resulting in a TCI-NH–BSA complex emitting around 527 nm (Figure 4A-C). This strong fluorescence increase, associated with the hypsochromic shift, suggests that TCI-NH becomes disassembled16,18,57 and is subsequently encapsulated within a hydrophobic protein pocket, thereby effectively shielding it from the aqueous environment. Such sequestration likely reduces polarity and restricts rotational freedom, thus stabilizing the excited state and thereby enhancing emission. Similar binding modes have been documented in the literature. For example, Liu and co-workers reported that a 2′-hydroxychalcone derivative initially exhibited aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) with a red-shifted emission band and underwent disassembly upon binding to human serum albumin (HSA).58 Subsequently, the disassembled probe molecules were encapsulated within the hydrophobic cavity of HSA, which led to a marked fluorescence enhancement and a blue shift. The close agreement between these observations and our findings provided a strong basis for our mechanistic interpretation.

A more moderate response was observed upon titration with G4 DNA. Under these conditions, the fluorescence intensity increased by about 12-fold and the emission maximum blue-shifted ∼20 nm, to approximately 557 nm (Figure 4D-F). The reduced magnitude of the spectral shifts, compared to the BSA complex, suggests that although TCI-NH can engage in π-stacking interactions with the terminal guanine tetrads—as observed for its closely related analogue DBI23 and numerous other ligands5962—it remains partially exposed to the aqueous environment. In contrast, no significant interaction occurred with dsDNA or ssDNA, likely due to the absence on TCI-NH of necessary positively charged moieties for strong electrostatic attraction with the DNA backbone (Figure 4G-H).

Global nonlinear curve-fitting analyses of the titration data yielded association constants (Ka) of about 6.7 × 106 M–1 for TCI-NH–BSA and 8.4 × 104 M–1 for TCI-NH–G4 complexes (Figure 4B and E), reinforcing the physiological relevance of these interactions.

After establishing the photophysical properties, subcellular localization, and potential biomolecular interactions of TCI-NH, we next assessed its capacity to act as a light-activated theranostic agent in anticancer research. We began by evaluating its ability to produce ROS in test tube settings with an initial focus on 1O2 generation, which has been a well-documented mechanism in BTI- and DBI-based compounds.16,23,24

To directly monitor 1O2 production, we measured the characteristic phosphorescence emission at ∼1270 nm in CHCl3 (Figure S8). Under these conditions, TCI-NH exhibited a modest ΦΔ of about 4%, consistent with the negligible 1O2 generation previously observed for its BTI precursor.16 To further verify this result in aqueous media, we employed 9,10-anthracenediyl-bis(methylene)dimalonic acid (ABDA) as a specific 1O2 sensor since it can be readily oxidized and bleached by 1O2, resulting in a decrease in its absorption that can be easily tracked by UV/vis spectroscopy (Figure S9).63

In the presence of TCI-NH, ABDA bleaching was minimal, providing a ΦΔ of about 7% corroborating the direct 1O2 measurements and confirming that TCI-NH is a poor 1O2 PS. We also examined whether complexation with biological macromolecules could enhance 1O2 generation, as TCI-NH is likely to be protein- or DNA-bound in the cellular environment.57 To this end, we tested TCI-NH complexed with BSA and with G4 DNA and it appeared that neither the TCI-NH–BSA nor the TCI-NH–G4 complex induced significant ABDA bleaching, remaining in line with the low ΦΔ (Figure S9). These findings suggested that, while TCI-NH interacts effectively with biological targets, this interaction does not substantially improve its 1O2 generation ability, making it a poor candidate for Type II PDT.

Prompted by the limited 1O2 production, we turned to explore alternative ROS generation pathways, particularly O2•–, which is often generated via a Type I mechanism. To investigate O2•– generation, we employed Dihydrorhodamine-123 (DHR-123), a nonfluorescent probe that becomes highly fluorescent upon oxidation to rhodamine-123 by O2•–.33 Under light irradiation, TCI-NH induced a gradual enhancement in DHR-123 fluorescence, reaching ∼20-fold after 300 s (Figure 5A). This clear fluorescence upturn confirmed that TCI-NH can efficiently produce O2•– radicals.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

A) Detection of O2•– using DHR-123 as a sensor. Turn-on fluorescence activation of DHR-123 (5 μM) was monitored as an indicator of O2•– generation by TCI-NH (5 μM) upon irradiation. Samples were irradiated at various time intervals (0–300 s) using excitation at 485 ± 20 nm. TCI-NH experiments were conducted in the presence of BSA (10 μM) or G4 DNA (10 μM) in Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 6.8) with 100 mM KCl. B) Intracellular ROS generation induced by TCI-NH. HeLa cells were treated with TCI-NH (0.5 μM) and CellROX Green reagent (5 μM). Where specified, blue light irradiation (6 min) was applied using a LED light cube and cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Fluorescence imaging was performed with excitation/emission wavelengths of 490/510–650 nm. Note that the extranuclear green fluorescence observed in TCI-NH-treated cells corresponds to the intrinsic fluorescence of TCI-NH, which coincides with that of CellROX. In contrast, the nuclear and nucleolar green fluorescence, highlighted by red arrows, indicates TCI-NH photoinduced oxidation of the CellROX Green reagent. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Next, we tested whether the TCI-NH–BSA or TCI-NH–G4 complexes could further enhance O2•– generation (Figure 5A). Remarkably, the TCI-NH–G4 complex boosted the DHR-123 fluorescence by about 70-fold after 300 s, representing a 3.5-fold increase compared to unbound TCI-NH. Even more strikingly, the TCI-NH–BSA complex elicited almost a 100-fold rise in DHR-123 oxidation, a 5-fold improvement over the free TCI-NH. These data strongly indicate that biomolecular interactions not only guide TCI-NH localization and enhance emission but also significantly amplify its capacity to photogenerate O2•– radicals.33,57 Such enhancement aligns with existing literature reports for other PSs, where protein or DNA binding modifies the photophysical properties and ROS output.18,33,57

Finally, to confirm that TCI-NH’s O2•–-generating ability observed in test tubes translates into cellular contexts, we employed CellROX—a nonfluorescent, green-emitting dye that becomes fluorescent upon oxidation by ROS and then localizes within the nucleus due to DNA binding.16,23,24 In the absence of light, cells incubated with TCI-NH and CellROX displayed no nuclear fluorescence, in line with a lack of photo-oxidative damage (Figure 5B). However, upon irradiation, cells treated with TCI-NH and CellROX showed strong nuclear fluorescence, confirming that TCI-NH is capable of photoinducing ROS within live cells.

The ability of TCI-NH to generate O2•–, combined with its preferential localization within the ER and mitochondria, led us to evaluate its potential photocytotoxic effects and more precisely, its capacity to selectively induce cell death under light irradiation, following a Type I PDT mechanism. Both the ER and mitochondria are pivotal in determining cellular fate. Mitochondria maintain membrane potential, modulate metabolic activity, and help govern apoptotic pathways through the delicate balance of ROS levels.31,64,65 In parallel, the ER regulates protein and lipid biosynthesis, calcium homeostasis, and the cellular stress response.31,66,67 Photoinduced oxidative stress in the ER can release stored calcium, triggering apoptotic signaling, while mitochondrial damage often leads to the release of pro-apoptotic factors and a surge in ROS.31 These organelles are functionally interconnected at mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs), ensuring that damage to one can influence the other, thereby orchestrating a potent, integrated cell death response.68

To evaluate TCI-NH’s phototherapeutic effectiveness, we conducted cytotoxicity experiments in HeLa cells (Figure 6). Under dark conditions, incubations with TCI-NH at concentrations up to 25 μM for 48 h produced no apparent toxicity, and cell viability was essentially unaffected. In stark contrast, when cells were treated with significantly lower TCI-NH concentrations (0.0121 μM to 1.56 μM) for 24 h and subsequently exposed to light, viability decreased dramatically, yielding an IC50 of 120.8 ± 8.6 nM. Notably, the timing of irradiation (after 24 h) coincided with the period during which TCI-NH was confirmed to be colocalized in the ER and mitochondria, thereby ensuring that the observed cell death could be attributed to targeted photodynamic action at these organelles level. Overall, these results highlight a phototherapeutic index of at least 200-fold, underscoring TCI-NH’s significant potential as an anticancer PS operating predominantly via a Type I (O2•–-mediated) mechanism.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(Photo)toxicity studies in HeLa cells. Cell viability was assessed in HeLa cells treated with varying concentrations of TCI-NH, either in the absence (dark conditions) or presence (light conditions) of blue light irradiation for 6 min. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3), with error bars indicating variability across replicates.

To gain insight into the mode of cell death triggered by TCI-NH, we performed real-time morphological assessments of treated cells (Figure S10). Under dark conditions, TCI-NH-treated cells remained morphologically indistinguishable from controls, consistent with its negligible dark toxicity. However, under continuous irradiation of the same area, cells began to exhibit hallmarks of apoptotic cell death.9,16,23,24 Distinct morphological alterations were indeed evident, including membrane blebbing and the formation of apoptotic bodies.69 These changes are classic indicators of apoptosis and strongly support the notion that TCI-NH-induced ROS generation, when activated by light, can drive an apoptotic response, which aligns well with previously reported analogues.16,23,24

Control experiments using DMSO-treated cells under identical illumination conditions showed no significant morphological alterations, confirming that the observed changes were due to the light-dependent activity of TCI-NH (Figure S10).

To further elucidate the mechanisms contributing to the robust PDT activity of TCI-NH—despite its relatively low 1O2 generation—we conducted electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) experiments in CHCl3 and DMSO. This approach was motivated by previous studies, which demonstrated that variations in solvent polarity, can significantly influence the photogeneration of distinct ROS.70 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) was employed as a 1O2 scavenger in CHCl3, with the increase in the characteristic 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl (TEMPO) radical signature monitored to quantify 1O2 generation efficiency.16,23,24 In parallel, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) was primarily used to characterize the formation of O2•– and related radical oxygen species (HO, HOO) in DMSO.16,23,24 In all cases, experiments were conducted on TCI-NH as well as DBI and BTI, which were used as benchmark photosensitizers for 1O223 or O2•–16 production, respectively.

As a result, EPR spectra upon constant irradiations of each tested PS in the presence of TEMP clearly confirmed our initial findings: while DBI exhibits very high efficient 1O2 generation efficiency,23TCI-NH show a, comparable to that of BTI (Figure S11).

In striking contrast, no significant buildup of DMPO-adduct signals was observed for DBI, whereas both BTI and TCI-NH demonstrated effective radical production, albeit with notable differences (Figure 7). The DMPO-adducts formed during BTI irradiation (Figure 7A and Figure S12A) can be attributed to a mixture of O2•– (g = 2.006, aN(G)=13.45, aH = 8.25, aH = 1.6, 55%) and HOO (g = 2.006, aN(G)=13.3, aH = 9.5, aH = 1, 45%) radicals.71,72 In the case of TCI-NH (Figure 7B and Figure S12B) a distinct and intense signature of an N-centered radical adduct was additionally observed alongside the O2•– and HOO adducts signal, and characterized by a unique hyperfine splitting pattern (g = 2.006, aN(G)=14.4, aH = 21, 30%) that can reasonably be attributed to the formation of a TCI-N radical. Combined with the results of biological experiments, these findings suggest that a Type I mechanism underlies the highly efficient photoinduced cell death observed with TCI-NH.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Experimental (blue) and simulated (red) EPR signals of DMPO adducts obtained under 455 nm illumination of DMSO solutions containing A) BTI and B) TCI-NH, highlighting the photoinduced generation of (A) O2•– (g = 2.006, aN(G)=13.45, aH = 8.25, aH = 1.6, 55%) and HOO (g = 2.006, aN(G)=13.3, aH = 9.5, aH = 1, 45%) and (B) O2•– (g = 2.006, aN(G)=13.5, aH = 8.2, aH = 1.65, 40%), HOO (g = 2.006, aN(G)=13.3, aH = 9.5, aH = 1, 30%) and TCI-N (g = 2.006, aN(G)=14.4, aH = 21, 30%).

In conclusion, this work introduces TCI-NH as a next-generation, heavy-atom-free PS that exemplifies a strategic pivot away from conventional, predominantly type II photodynamic pathways. Unlike traditional 1O2-based approaches, TCI-NH efficiently generates both O2•– and PS-centered radicals under light activation, thereby expanding the available toolkit for ROS-mediated tumor ablation. Its capacity to target both the ER and mitochondria, a tandem of organelles integral to apoptotic signaling, ensures a potent and synergistic mode of cellular assault. The result is rapid and light-driven cell death easily characterized by distinct apoptotic features, including pronounced membrane blebbing, formation of apoptotic bodies, and nuclear deformation.

Crucially, TCI-NH’s phototoxicity is amplified by interactions with proteins and G4 DNA domains, highlighting the importance of selective biomolecular binding in refining subcellular localization and increasing ROS yield. The ability of these complexes to enhance fluorescence and O2•– generation provides a powerful avenue for both image-guided therapy and improved therapeutic indices. Remarkably, TCI-NH achieves high photocytotoxicity with minimal dark toxicity and an impressive phototherapeutic index exceeding 200, an accomplishment that underscores its translational potential.

Collectively, these findings position the TCI-NH molecular design as a compelling theranostic strategy for next-generation PSs, seamlessly integrating bright fluorescence imaging with efficient protein- and DNA-assisted radical generation to enable safer, more effective, and versatile treatments against malignant cells. To further advance the therapeutic outcome and accelerate clinical translation, we have initiated studies in more sophisticated in vivo models. Our recent investigations using both wild type and transgenic zebrafish harboring rhabdomyosarcoma tumors have yielded very promising phototherapeutic outcomes, with detailed results to be published in the near future.

Acknowledgments

M.De. would like to acknowledge financial support from project No. 2022/47/P/NZ5/01156, which is cofunded by the National Science Centre and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 945339. N.S. acknowledges support from the Swedish Cancer Society (22 2380 Pj 01 H), and Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundations (KAW 2021.0173). D.P.S. and A.K. acknowledge the MITI of the CNRS. This work also received financial support from the ANR (BTXI-Apogee, ANR-20-CE05-0029).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00136.

  • Experimental details, synthesis and characterization, crystallographic data, ABDA bleaching experiments, dynamic imaging of cellular morphology changes and EPR data (PDF)

  • Transparent Peer Review report available (PDF)

Author Contributions

Conceptualization (M.De, C.C.), synthesis, and characterization of the compound (A.K., D.P.S., M.A., G.C.W., P.J., C.C.), experimental studies and data analysis of photophysical and biophysical experiments (K.S., M.Du., L.K., C.M., M.De), designed biological studies (M.De), biological experiments and data analysis (M.De), writing original draft (M.De with inputs from all authors), funding acquisition (M.De, N.S, C.C), project administration (M.De, C.C.). All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

# K.S. and A.K. contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jz5c00136_si_001.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)
jz5c00136_si_002.pdf (286.9KB, pdf)

References

  1. Li X.; Lovell J. F.; Yoon J.; Chen X. Clinical development and potential of photothermal and photodynamic therapies for cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 2020, 17 (11), 657–674. 10.1038/s41571-020-0410-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Pham T. C.; Nguyen V.-N.; Choi Y.; Lee S.; Yoon J. Recent Strategies to Develop Innovative Photosensitizers for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121 (21), 13454–13619. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Singh N.; Sen Gupta R.; Bose S. A comprehensive review on singlet oxygen generation in nanomaterials and conjugated polymers for photodynamic therapy in the treatment of cancer. Nanoscale 2024, 16 (7), 3243–3268. 10.1039/D3NR05801H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Di Mascio P.; Martinez G. R.; Miyamoto S.; Ronsein G. E.; Medeiros M. H. G.; Cadet J. Singlet Molecular Oxygen Reactions with Nucleic Acids, Lipids, and Proteins. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119 (3), 2043–2086. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ortiz-Rodríguez L. A.; Crespo-Hernández C. E. Thionated organic compounds as emerging heavy-atom-free photodynamic therapy agents. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (41), 11113–11123. 10.1039/D0SC04747C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nguyen V.-N.; Yan Y.; Zhao J.; Yoon J. Heavy-Atom-Free Photosensitizers: From Molecular Design to Applications in the Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54 (1), 207–220. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Filatov M. A. Heavy-atom-free BODIPY photosensitizers with intersystem crossing mediated by intramolecular photoinduced electron transfer. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2020, 18 (1), 10–27. 10.1039/C9OB02170A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. He G.; Xu N.; Ge H.; Lu Y.; Wang R.; Wang H.; Du J.; Fan J.; Sun W.; Peng X. Red-Light-Responsive Ru Complex Photosensitizer for Lysosome Localization Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (17), 19572–19580. 10.1021/acsami.0c22551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miao J.; Huo Y.; Yao G.; Feng Y.; Weng J.; Zhao W.; Guo W. Heavy Atom-Free, Mitochondria-Targeted, and Activatable Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy with Real-Time In-Situ Therapeutic Monitoring. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61 (25), e202201815 10.1002/anie.202201815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang X.; Wang Z.; Hou Y.; Yan Y.; Zhao J.; Dick B. Recent development of heavy-atom-free triplet photosensitizers: molecular structure design, photophysics and application. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2021, 9 (36), 11944–11973. 10.1039/D1TC02535J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang Z.; Ivanov M.; Gao Y.; Bussotti L.; Foggi P.; Zhang H.; Russo N.; Dick B.; Zhao J.; Di Donato M.; et al. Spin-Orbit Charge-Transfer Intersystem Crossing (ISC) in Compact Electron Donor-Acceptor Dyads: ISC Mechanism and Application as Novel and Potent Photodynamic Therapy Reagents. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26 (5), 1091–1102. 10.1002/chem.201904306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peng Y.-Z.; Guo G.-C.; Guo S.; Kong L.-H.; Lu T.-B.; Zhang Z.-M. Charge Transfer from Donor to Acceptor in Conjugated Microporous Polymer for Enhanced Photosensitization. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (40), 22062–22069. 10.1002/anie.202109968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhao Y.; Duan R.; Zhao J.; Li C. Spin-orbit charge transfer intersystem crossing in perylenemonoimide-phenothiazine compact electron donor-acceptor dyads. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54 (87), 12329–12332. 10.1039/C8CC07012A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang J.; Mukamel S.; Jiang J. Aggregation-Induced Intersystem Crossing: Rational Design for Phosphorescence Manipulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124 (11), 2238–2244. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c00654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Galán L. A.; Andrés Castán J. M.; Dalinot C.; Marqués P. S.; Galiana J.; Blanchard P.; Andraud C.; Dumont E.; Maury O.; Cabanetos C.; et al. Exploring the Concept of Dimerization-Induced Intersystem Crossing: At the Origins of Spin-Orbit Coupling Selection Rules. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021, 125 (30), 8572–8580. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c05082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Deiana M.; Josse P.; Dalinot C.; Osmolovskyi A.; Marqués P. S.; Castán J. M. A.; Abad Galán L.; Allain M.; Khrouz L.; Maury O.; et al. Site-selected thionated benzothioxanthene chromophores as heavy-atom-free small-molecule photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Communications Chemistry 2022, 5 (1), 142. 10.1038/s42004-022-00752-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pham T. C.; Heo S.; Nguyen V.-N.; Lee M. W.; Yoon J.; Lee S. Molecular Design toward Heavy-Atom-free Photosensitizers Based on the C=S Bond and their Dual Functions in Hypoxia Photodynamic Cancer Therapy and ClO- Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (12), 13949–13957. 10.1021/acsami.0c22174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nguyen V.-N.; Qi S.; Kim S.; Kwon N.; Kim G.; Yim Y.; Park S.; Yoon J. An Emerging Molecular Design Approach to Heavy-Atom-Free Photosensitizers for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy under Hypoxia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (41), 16243–16248. 10.1021/jacs.9b09220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu Y.; Zhen Y.; Ma Y.; Zheng R.; Wang Z.; Fu H. Exceptional Intersystem Crossing in Di(perylene bisimide)s: A Structural Platform toward Photosensitizers for Singlet Oxygen Generation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1 (17), 2499–2502. 10.1021/jz1008328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Reger D.; Haines P.; Heinemann F. W.; Guldi D. M.; Jux N. Oxa[7]superhelicene: A π-Extended Helical Chromophore Based on Hexa-peri-hexabenzocoronenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (20), 5938–5942. 10.1002/anie.201800585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nagarajan K.; Mallia A. R.; Muraleedharan K.; Hariharan M. Enhanced intersystem crossing in core-twisted aromatics. Chemical Science 2017, 8 (3), 1776–1782. 10.1039/C6SC05126J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lv M.; Yu Y.; Sandoval-Salinas M. E.; Xu J.; Lei Z.; Casanova D.; Yang Y.; Chen J. Engineering the Charge-Transfer State to Facilitate Spin-Orbit Charge Transfer Intersystem Crossing in Spirobis[anthracene]diones. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (49), 22179–22184. 10.1002/anie.202009439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Deiana M.; Andrés Castán J. M.; Josse P.; Kahsay A.; Sánchez D. P.; Morice K.; Gillet N.; Ravindranath R.; Patel A. K.; Sengupta P.; et al. A new G-quadruplex-specific photosensitizer inducing genome instability in cancer cells by triggering oxidative DNA damage and impeding replication fork progression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51 (12), 6264–6285. 10.1093/nar/gkad365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sánchez D. P.; Morice K.; Mutovska M. G.; Khrouz L.; Josse P.; Allain M.; Gohier F.; Blanchard P.; Monnereau C.; Le Bahers T.; et al. Heavy-atom-free π-twisted photosensitizers for fluorescence bioimaging and photodynamic therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12 (33), 8107–8121. 10.1039/D4TB01014K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liang H.; Lu M.; Mahmood Z.; Li Z.; Chen Z.; Chen G.; Li M.-D.; Huo Y.; Ji S. Efficient Intersystem Crossing and Long-lived Charge-Separated State Induced by Through-Space Intramolecular Charge Transfer in a Parallel Geometry Carbazole-Bodipy Dyad. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62 (44), e202312600 10.1002/anie.202312600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tang J.; Wang L.; Loredo A.; Cole C.; Xiao H. Single-atom replacement as a general approach towards visible-light/near-infrared heavy-atom-free photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (26), 6701–6708. 10.1039/D0SC02286A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhao X.; Yao Q.; Long S.; Chi W.; Yang Y.; Tan D.; Liu X.; Huang H.; Sun W.; Du J.; et al. An Approach to Developing Cyanines with Simultaneous Intersystem Crossing Enhancement and Excited-State Lifetime Elongation for Photodynamic Antitumor Metastasis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143 (31), 12345–12354. 10.1021/jacs.1c06275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pham T. C.; Hoang T. T. H.; Tran D. N.; Kim G.; Nguyen T. V.; Pham T. V.; Nandanwar S.; Tran D. L.; Park M.; Lee S. Imidazolium-Based Heavy-Atom-Free Photosensitizer for Nucleus-Targeted Fluorescence Bioimaging and Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15 (41), 47969–47977. 10.1021/acsami.3c10200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dong Y.; Sukhanov A. A.; Zhao J.; Elmali A.; Li X.; Dick B.; Karatay A.; Voronkova V. K. Spin-Orbit Charge-Transfer Intersystem Crossing (SOCT-ISC) in Bodipy-Phenoxazine Dyads: Effect of Chromophore Orientation and Conformation Restriction on the Photophysical Properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (37), 22793–22811. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee Y.-L.; Chou Y.-T.; Su B.-K.; Wu C.-c.; Wang C.-H.; Chang K.-H.; Ho J.-a. A.; Chou P.-T. Comprehensive Thione-Derived Perylene Diimides and Their Bio-Conjugation for Simultaneous Imaging, Tracking, and Targeted Photodynamic Therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (37), 17249–17260. 10.1021/jacs.2c07967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang R.; Li X.; Yoon J. Organelle-Targeted Photosensitizers for Precision Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (17), 19543–19571. 10.1021/acsami.1c02019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. An J.; Tang S.; Hong G.; Chen W.; Chen M.; Song J.; Li Z.; Peng X.; Song F.; Zheng W.-H. An unexpected strategy to alleviate hypoxia limitation of photodynamic therapy by biotinylation of photosensitizers. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13 (1), 2225. 10.1038/s41467-022-29862-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen W.; Wang Z.; Tian M.; Hong G.; Wu Y.; Sui M.; Chen M.; An J.; Song F.; Peng X. Integration of TADF Photosensitizer as “Electron Pump” and BSA as “Electron Reservoir” for Boosting Type I Photodynamic Therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145 (14), 8130–8140. 10.1021/jacs.3c01042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Feng L.; Li C.; Liu L.; Wang Z.; Chen Z.; Yu J.; Ji W.; Jiang G.; Zhang P.; Wang J.; et al. Acceptor Planarization and Donor Rotation: A Facile Strategy for Realizing Synergistic Cancer Phototherapy via Type I PDT and PTT. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (3), 4162–4174. 10.1021/acsnano.1c10019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu B.; Wang L.; Tang H.; Cao D. Recent advances in type I organic photosensitizers for efficient photodynamic therapy for overcoming tumor hypoxia. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11 (21), 4600–4618. 10.1039/D3TB00545C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang H.; Long S.; Huang D.; Du J.; Fan J.; Peng X. A photosensitizer with conformational restriction for enhanced photodynamic therapy. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57 (72), 9100–9103. 10.1039/D1CC03591F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Bu Y.; Zhu X.; Wang H.; Zhang J.; Wang L.; Yu Z.; Tian Y.; Zhou H.; Xie Y. Self-Monitoring the Endo-Lysosomal Escape and Near-Infrared-Activated Mitophagy To Guide Synergistic Type-I Photodynamic and Photothermal Therapy. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93 (35), 12059–12066. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Li L.; Shao C.; Liu T.; Chao Z.; Chen H.; Xiao F.; He H.; Wei Z.; Zhu Y.; Wang H.; et al. An NIR-II-Emissive Photosensitizer for Hypoxia-Tolerant Photodynamic Theranostics. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32 (45), 2003471. 10.1002/adma.202003471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sun Z.; Wang H.; Lin F.; Liang G.; Qin T.; Yang Z.; Chi Z. Benzophenone core-based AIE-active photosensitizers for mitochondria-targeted photodynamic therapy. New J. Chem. 2022, 46 (41), 19909–19914. 10.1039/D2NJ03312G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhuang Z.; Dai J.; Yu M.; Li J.; Shen P.; Hu R.; Lou X.; Zhao Z.; Tang B. Z. Type I photosensitizers based on phosphindole oxide for photodynamic therapy: apoptosis and autophagy induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (13), 3405–3417. 10.1039/D0SC00785D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Xiao Y.-F.; Chen W.-C.; Chen J.-X.; Lu G.; Tian S.; Cui X.; Zhang Z.; Chen H.; Wan Y.; Li S.; et al. Amplifying Free Radical Generation of AIE Photosensitizer with Small Singlet-Triplet Splitting for Hypoxia-Overcoming Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14 (4), 5112–5121. 10.1021/acsami.1c23797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li X.; Lee D.; Huang J.-D.; Yoon J. Phthalocyanine-Assembled Nanodots as Photosensitizers for Highly Efficient Type I Photoreactions in Photodynamic Therapy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (31), 9885–9890. 10.1002/anie.201806551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shigemitsu H.; Sato K.; Hagio S.; Tani Y.; Mori T.; Ohkubo K.; Osakada Y.; Fujitsuka M.; Kida T. Amphiphilic Rhodamine Nano-assembly as a Type I Supramolecular Photosensitizer for Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2022, 5 (10), 14954–14960. 10.1021/acsanm.2c03192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Teng K.-X.; Niu L.-Y.; Yang Q.-Z. A host-guest strategy for converting the photodynamic agents from a singlet oxygen generator to a superoxide radical generator. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (20), 5951–5956. 10.1039/D2SC01469F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Teng K.-X.; Chen W.-K.; Niu L.-Y.; Fang W.-H.; Cui G.; Yang Q.-Z. BODIPY-Based Photodynamic Agents for Exclusively Generating Superoxide Radical over Singlet Oxygen. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (36), 19912–19920. 10.1002/anie.202106748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lu B.; Zhang Z.; Ji Y.; Zhou S.; Jia B.; Zhang Y.; Wang J.; Ding Y.; Wang Y.; Yao Y.; et al. Icing on the cake: combining a dual PEG-functionalized pillararene and an A-D-A small molecule photosensitizer for multimodal phototherapy. Science China Chemistry 2022, 65 (6), 1134–1141. 10.1007/s11426-022-1232-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Merabti A.; Sánchez D. P.; Nocentini A.; Ali L. M. A.; Nguyen C.; Durand D.; Hamon K.; Ghanem T.; Arnoux P.; Josse P.; et al. Thiochromenocarbazole imide-based photosensitizers decorated with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors for the targeted treatment of hypoxic tumours. Materials Advances 2024, 5 (10), 4172–4177. 10.1039/D3MA00926B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nsubuga A.; Morice K.; Fayad N.; Pini F.; Josserand V.; Le Guével X.; Alhabi A.; Henry M.; Puchán Sánchez D.; Plassais N.; et al. Sub 20 nm Upconversion Photosensitizers for Near-Infrared Photodynamic Theranostics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35 (1), 2410077. 10.1002/adfm.202410077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Neidle S. Quadruplex nucleic acids as targets for anticancer therapeutics. Nature Reviews Chemistry 2017, 1 (5), 0041. 10.1038/s41570-017-0041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Andrés Castán J. M.; Abad Galán L.; Li S.; Dalinot C.; Simón Marqués P.; Allain M.; Risko C.; Monnereau C.; Maury O.; Blanchard P.; et al. Nitration of benzothioxanthene: towards a new class of dyes with versatile photophysical properties. New J. Chem. 2020, 44 (3), 900–905. 10.1039/C9NJ05804D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Han Q.-F.; Li W.-J.; Hu K.-S.; Gao J.; Zhai W.-L.; Yang J.-H.; Zhang S.-J. Exosome biogenesis: machinery, regulation, and therapeutic implications in cancer. Molecular Cancer 2022, 21 (1), 207. 10.1186/s12943-022-01671-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Cruz A. L. S.; Barreto E. d. A.; Fazolini N. P. B.; Viola J. P. B.; Bozza P. T. Lipid droplets: platforms with multiple functions in cancer hallmarks. Cell Death & Disease 2020, 11 (2), 105. 10.1038/s41419-020-2297-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Doimo M.; Chaudhari N.; Abrahamsson S.; L’Hôte V.; Nguyen T. V. H.; Berner A.; Ndi M.; Abrahamsson A.; Das Rabindra N.; Aasumets K.; et al. Enhanced mitochondrial G-quadruplex formation impedes replication fork progression leading to mtDNA loss in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51 (14), 7392–7408. 10.1093/nar/gkad535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Deiana M.; Chand K.; Chorell E.; Sabouri N. Parallel G-Quadruplex DNA Structures from Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genomes Trigger Emission Enhancement in a Nonfluorescent Nano-aggregated Fluorine-Boron-Based Dye. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14 (7), 1862–1869. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Bedrat A.; Lacroix L.; Mergny J.-L. Re-evaluation of G-quadruplex propensity with G4Hunter. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44 (4), 1746–1759. 10.1093/nar/gkw006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Dudek M.; López-Pacios L.; Sabouri N.; Nogueira J. J.; Martinez-Fernandez L.; Deiana M. A Rationally Designed Azobenzene Photoswitch for DNA G-Quadruplex Regulation in Live Cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025, 64 (1), e202413000 10.1002/anie.202413000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Saczuk K.; Dudek M.; Matczyszyn K.; Deiana M. Advancements in molecular disassembly of optical probes: a paradigm shift in sensing, bioimaging, and therapeutics. Nanoscale Horizons 2024, 9 (9), 1390–1416. 10.1039/D4NH00186A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Luo Z.; Lv T.; Zhu K.; Li Y.; Wang L.; Gooding J. J.; Liu G.; Liu B. Paper-Based Ratiometric Fluorescence Analytical Devices towards Point-of-Care Testing of Human Serum Albumin. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (8), 3131–3136. 10.1002/anie.201915046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Deiana M.; Obi I.; Andreasson M.; Tamilselvi S.; Chand K.; Chorell E.; Sabouri N. A Minimalistic Coumarin Turn-On Probe for Selective Recognition of Parallel G-Quadruplex DNA Structures. ACS Chem. Biol. 2021, 16 (8), 1365–1376. 10.1021/acschembio.1c00134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Deiana M.; Mosser M.; Le Bahers T.; Dumont E.; Dudek M.; Denis-Quanquin S.; Sabouri N.; Andraud C.; Matczyszyn K.; Monnereau C.; et al. Light-induced in situ chemical activation of a fluorescent probe for monitoring intracellular G-quadruplex structures. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (32), 13795–13808. 10.1039/D1NR02855C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Deiana M.; Chand K.; Jamroskovic J.; Obi I.; Chorell E.; Sabouri N. A Light-up Logic Platform for Selective Recognition of Parallel G-Quadruplex Structures via Disaggregation-Induced Emission. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (2), 896–902. 10.1002/anie.201912027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Deiana M.; Chand K.; Jamroskovic J.; Das R. N.; Obi I.; Chorell E.; Sabouri N. A site-specific self-assembled light-up rotor probe for selective recognition and stabilization of c-MYC G-quadruplex DNA. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (24), 12950–12957. 10.1039/D0NR03404E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Entradas T.; Waldron S.; Volk M. The detection sensitivity of commonly used singlet oxygen probes in aqueous environments. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 2020, 204, 111787. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lv W.; Zhang Z.; Zhang K. Y.; Yang H.; Liu S.; Xu A.; Guo S.; Zhao Q.; Huang W. A Mitochondria-Targeted Photosensitizer Showing Improved Photodynamic Therapy Effects Under Hypoxia. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (34), 9947–9951. 10.1002/anie.201604130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Chakrabortty S.; Agrawalla B. K.; Stumper A.; Vegi N. M.; Fischer S.; Reichardt C.; Kögler M.; Dietzek B.; Feuring-Buske M.; Buske C.; et al. Mitochondria Targeted Protein-Ruthenium Photosensitizer for Efficient Photodynamic Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (6), 2512–2519. 10.1021/jacs.6b13399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ma H.; Lu Y.; Huang Z.; Long S.; Cao J.; Zhang Z.; Zhou X.; Shi C.; Sun W.; Du J.; et al. ER-Targeting Cyanine Dye as an NIR Photoinducer to Efficiently Trigger Photoimmunogenic Cancer Cell Death. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (8), 3477–3486. 10.1021/jacs.1c11886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Li S.; Chen Y.; Wu Y.; Yao S.; Yuan H.; Tan Y.; Qi F.; He W.; Guo Z. An Endoplasmic Reticulum Targeting Type I Photosensitizer for Effective Photodynamic Therapy against Hypoxic Tumor Cells. Chem. Eur. J. 2022, 28 (72), e202202680 10.1002/chem.202202680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Missiroli S.; Patergnani S.; Caroccia N.; Pedriali G.; Perrone M.; Previati M.; Wieckowski M. R.; Giorgi C. Mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) and inflammation. Cell Death & Disease 2018, 9 (3), 329. 10.1038/s41419-017-0027-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Gao Y.; Wang X.; He X.; He Z.; Yang X.; Tian S.; Meng F.; Ding D.; Luo L.; Tang B. Z. A Dual-Functional Photosensitizer for Ultraefficient Photodynamic Therapy and Synchronous Anticancer Efficacy Monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29 (32), 1902673. 10.1002/adfm.201902673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhuang Z.; Li J.; Shen P.; Zhao Z.; Tang B. Z. Exploring and leveraging aggregation effects on reactive oxygen species generation in photodynamic therapy. Aggregate 2024, 5 (4), e540 10.1002/agt2.540. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Clément J.-L.; Ferré N.; Siri D.; Karoui H.; Rockenbauer A.; Tordo P. Assignment of the EPR Spectrum of 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-Oxide (DMPO) Superoxide Spin Adduct. Journal of Organic Chemistry 2005, 70 (4), 1198–1203. 10.1021/jo048518z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Mao L.; Quan Z.; Liu Z.-S.; Huang C.-H.; Wang Z.-H.; Tang T.-S.; Li P.-L.; Shao J.; Liu Y.-J.; Zhu B.-Z. Molecular mechanism of the metal-independent production of hydroxyl radicals by thiourea dioxide and H2O2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2024, 121 (14), e2302967120 10.1073/pnas.2302967120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jz5c00136_si_001.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)
jz5c00136_si_002.pdf (286.9KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES