Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1989 Sep;416:19–30. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017746

Corticofugal action on transmission of group I input from the hindlimb to the pericruciate cortex in the cat.

A K McIntyre 1, U Proske 1, J A Rawson 1
PMCID: PMC1189200  PMID: 2607448

Abstract

1. In cats anaesthetized with alpha-chloralose, evidence was sought for a corticofugal action on input from muscle group I afferents projecting to the cerebral cortex via the brain stem relay at nucleus Z. 2. Extracellular recordings were made of responses of thirty-four nucleus Z neurones which could be activated by stimuli at group I strength applied to each of a variety of hindlimb muscle nerves. Afferent input to each nucleus Z neurone was restricted to a single muscle. 3. Nucleus Z neurones typically showed a resting discharge which could be increased or decreased by altering the amount of stretch on the muscle which was the source of the afferent input. Ventral root stimulation gave response patterns which showed these neurones to be driven by input from either tendon organs or muscle spindles, but not both. 4. A brief train of focal, cathodal stimuli applied to a discrete region of pericruciate cortex could consistently inhibit the maintained activity evoked by muscle stretch in nucleus Z neurones, or the response evoked by stimulation of the muscle nerve at group I strength. The inhibition was powerful and lasted 50-400 ms. The effective stimulating site corresponded to area 3a, the main cortical receiving area for hindlimb muscle group I input. 5. Since the ascending spinal axons which project to nucleus Z are collaterals of dorsal spinocerebellar tract fibres, it was possible to stimulate the parent axons at their termination in the anterior lobe of the cerebellum. Cortical stimulation was found to have little or no effect on activity in nucleus Z neurones evoked by cerebellar stimulation over conditioning-test intervals in the range 10-200 ms. 6. It is concluded that over the time intervals for which it has been tested, corticofugal inhibitory action appears to be largely operating at the first spinal segmental relay, in Clarke's column. Thus the inhibitory action arising in area 3a of the cerebral cortex will suppress the action of input from hindlimb group I fibres at the level both of the cerebellum and the cerebral cortex.

Full text

PDF
19

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANDERSEN P., ECCLES J. C., SEARS T. A. Presynaptic inhibitory action of cerebral cortex on the spinal cord. Nature. 1962 May 26;194:740–741. doi: 10.1038/194740a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRODAL A., POMPEIANO O. The vestibular nuclei in cat. J Anat. 1957 Oct;91(4):438–454. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Flindt-Egebak P. An autoradiographical study of the projections from the feline sensorimotor cortex to the brain stem. J Hirnforsch. 1979;20(4):375–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GORDON G., JUKES M. G. DESCENDING INFLUENCES ON THE EXTEROCEPTIVE ORGANIZATIONS OF THE CAT'S GRACILE NUCLEUS. J Physiol. 1964 Sep;173:291–319. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HAGBARTH K. E., FEX J. Centrifugal influences on single unit activity in spinal sensory paths. J Neurophysiol. 1959 May;22(3):321–338. doi: 10.1152/jn.1959.22.3.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HAGBARTH K. E., KERR D. I. Central influences on spinal afferent conduction. J Neurophysiol. 1954 May;17(3):295–307. doi: 10.1152/jn.1954.17.3.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hongo T., Okada Y., Sato M. Corticofugal influences on transmission to the dorsal spinocerebellar tract from hindlimb primary afferents. Exp Brain Res. 1967;3(2):135–149. doi: 10.1007/BF00233258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. JABBUR S. J., TOWE A. L. Cortical excitation of neurons in dorsal column nuclei of cat, including an analysis of pathways. J Neurophysiol. 1961 Sep;24:499–509. doi: 10.1152/jn.1961.24.5.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johansson H., Silfvenius H. Axon-collateral activation by dorsal spinocerebellar tract fibres of group I relay cells of nucleus Z in the cat medulla oblongata. J Physiol. 1977 Feb;265(2):341–369. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LUNDBERG A., NORRSELL U., VOORHOEVE P. EFFECTS FROM THE SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX ON ASCENDING SPINAL PATHWAYS. Acta Physiol Scand. 1963 Dec;59:462–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1963.tb02762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Landgren S., Silfvenius H. Projection to cerebral cortex of group I muscle afferents from the cat's hind limb. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(2):353–372. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Low J. S., Mantle-St John L. A., Tracey D. J. Nucleus z in the rat: spinal afferents from collaterals of dorsal spinocerebellar tract neurons. J Comp Neurol. 1986 Jan 22;243(4):510–526. doi: 10.1002/cne.902430406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Magherini P. C., Pompeiano O., Seguin J. J. Responses of nucleus z neurons to vibration of hindlimb extensor muscles in the decerebrate cat. Arch Ital Biol. 1975 Jun;113(2):150–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McCloskey D. I. Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev. 1978 Oct;58(4):763–820. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1978.58.4.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McIntyre A. K., Proske U., Rawson J. A. Cortical projection of afferent information from tendon organs in the cat. J Physiol. 1984 Sep;354:395–406. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McIntyre A. K., Proske U., Rawson J. A. Pathway to the cerebral cortex for impulses from tendon organs in the cat's hind limb. J Physiol. 1985 Dec;369:115–126. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PHILLIPS C. G., PORTER R. Unifocal and bifocal stimulation of the motor cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;162:532–538. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. TOWE A. L., JABBUR S. J. Cortical inhibition of neurons in dorsal column nuclei of cat. J Neurophysiol. 1961 Sep;24:488–498. doi: 10.1152/jn.1961.24.5.488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES