Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1989 Sep;416:327–336. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017763

Electromyographic cross-talk within a compartmentalized muscle of the cat.

A W English 1, O I Weeks 1
PMCID: PMC1189217  PMID: 2558175

Abstract

1. Experiments were conducted to test the extent to which the electromyographic (EMG) activity generated by the activation of single motor units is conducted from one neuromuscular compartment of the cat lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscle into adjacent compartments. 2. Potentials produced by stimulation of forty-five single motor units were monitored from bipolar fine-wire EMG electrodes which had been implanted either into the centres of each of the four neuromuscular compartments of LG or into regions of the muscle known to lie on the border of contiguous compartments. 3. In all cases single unit potentials could be recorded from the electrodes in the centre of the compartments which clearly identified the compartment of residence of the muscle unit. Regardless of unit type, the amplitude of the potential recorded from electrodes in one compartment was always greater than that recorded from any other compartment. 4. Smaller potentials could be recorded from electrodes in the centre of compartments adjacent to the compartment of residence of the muscle unit. For those motor units where the amplitude of the EMG potentials recorded from the compartment of residence was large, the amplitude of such 'cross-talk' could be greater than the amplitude of potentials recorded from the compartment of residence of smaller motor units. 5. In the case of electrodes placed at compartment boundaries, no clear compartment selectivity of recording of motor unit potentials was evident. 6. These results indicate that great care must be taken in choosing sites of EMG electrode placement when performing kinesiological studies, especially when the amplitude of the EMG activity recorded is of consideration.

Full text

PDF
327

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bawa P., Binder M. D., Ruenzel P., Henneman E. Recruitment order of motoneurons in stretch reflexes is highly correlated with their axonal conduction velocity. J Neurophysiol. 1984 Sep;52(3):410–420. doi: 10.1152/jn.1984.52.3.410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buys E. J., Lemon R. N., Mantel G. W., Muir R. B. Selective facilitation of different hand muscles by single corticospinal neurones in the conscious monkey. J Physiol. 1986 Dec;381:529–549. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. English A. W. An electromyographic analysis of compartments in cat lateral gastrocnemius muscle during unrestrained locomotion. J Neurophysiol. 1984 Jul;52(1):114–125. doi: 10.1152/jn.1984.52.1.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. English A. W., Letbetter W. D. Anatomy and innervation patterns of cat lateral gastrocnemius and plantaris muscles. Am J Anat. 1982 May;164(1):67–77. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001640107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. English A. W., Weeks O. I. Compartmentalization of single muscle units in cat lateral gastrocnemius. Exp Brain Res. 1984;56(2):361–368. doi: 10.1007/BF00236292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fetz E. E., Cheney P. D. Postspike facilitation of forelimb muscle activity by primate corticomotoneuronal cells. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Oct;44(4):751–772. doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.44.4.751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gydikov A., Gerilovsky L., Gatev P., Kostov K. Volume conduction of motor unit potentials from different human muscles to long distances. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982 Jan-Feb;22(1-2):105–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herring S. W., Grimm A. F., Grimm B. R. Functional heterogeneity in a multipinnate muscle. Am J Anat. 1979 Apr;154(4):563–576. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001540410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoffer J. A., Loeb G. E., Marks W. B., O'Donovan M. J., Pratt C. A., Sugano N. Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. I. Destination, axonal conduction velocity, and recruitment threshold. J Neurophysiol. 1987 Feb;57(2):510–529. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.57.2.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mangun G. R., Mulkey R. M., Young B. L., Goslow G. E., Jr "Cross-talk" in electromyograms: contamination of EMGs recorded with bipolar fine-wire electrodes by volume conducted myoelectric activity from distant sources. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986 Aug-Sep;26(5-6):443–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McDonagh J. C., Binder M. D., Reinking R. M., Stuart D. G. Tetrapartite classification of motor units of cat tibialis posterior. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Oct;44(4):696–712. doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.44.4.696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Donovan M. J., Pinter M. J., Dum R. P., Burke R. E. Kinesiological studies of self- and cross-reinnervated FDL and soleus muscles in freely moving cats. J Neurophysiol. 1985 Oct;54(4):852–866. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.4.852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES