Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0316646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316646

Developing a competency assessment framework for pharmacists in primary health care settings in India

Sanjeev Kumar 1,*, Purnima Bhoi 2, Manjiri Sandeep Gharat 3,4,5, Guru Prasad Mohanta 6
Editor: Naeem Mubarak7
PMCID: PMC11892806  PMID: 40063591

Abstract

Background

Competency frameworks in the pharmacy profession define the necessary practice standards and establish benchmarks for work accountability and career progression. Pharmacists are integral to primary healthcare, and assessing their competencies is essential for improving the performance of primary healthcare services. Although several countries have developed competency frameworks for pharmacists in primary healthcare, such frameworks are currently lacking in India.

Methods

This study aimed to develop a competency assessment framework for in-service pharmacists in Indian public primary healthcare settings. For which, a five-stage consultative process was followed. In the first stage, the systematic literature review was conducted to identify pharmacist competencies in the primary healthcare setting. After that, an expert consultation was organized to develop consensus among experts on competencies and its behaviours. Competency assessment tools were then developed based on the literature and later finalized through experts’ agreements during consultation. Finally, the tools were tested in one of the public primary healthcare facilities.

Results

In stage one, the systematic literature review identified 20 competencies and 175 associated behaviors distributed across four domains: Pharmaceutical Health, Pharmaceutical Care, Organization and Management, and Professional/Personal. Expert consultations resulted in the consensus on 11 roles as domains of pharmacists in Indian primary healthcare settings during stage 2. During the expert consultation, each one of 11 pharmacist’s role and competencies and behaviours was discussed and consensus was arrived on 26 competencies and 107 behaviours. For which, under the role of pharmacy management, one of the critical competency for primary health care pharmacist is the knowledge about the layout and infrastructure of the pharmacy/store and how to adapt it to optimize pharmacy services. For this competency, one of the behaviour is assessment of the existing infrastructure and identifying gaps and opportunities for improvement.

After that in stage 3, a competency assessment tool was developed, and consensus was made on it in stage 4 during expert consultation. The developed tool contains instruments such as a questionnaire to assess knowledge and attitude, and observational checklist, mini-clinical exercises for specific conditions, and simulation exercises to assess skills.

Conclusions

This study successfully developed a competency assessment framework for in-service pharmacists in Indian public primary healthcare settings. The framework encompasses 24 competencies and associated behaviors, covering 11 roles of pharmacists in Indian primary healthcare settings. For example, under the pharmacy management role, some of the competencies include planning and procurement, inventory management, storage conditions, digital literacy to handle supply chain-led IT Systems, NSQ Medical Products Management, etc.

The developed competency assessment tool assessing knowledge, attitude and skills provides a comprehensive framework for assessing pharmacist competencies and identifying competency gaps. The framework can be used to capacitate pharmacists and improve their performance. It improves their performance in primary healthcare settings, and enhance the delivery of healthcare services in India. Additionally, it fills a critical gap in the existing literature and can serve as a valuable resource for policymakers, educators, and healthcare professionals involved in pharmacy practice in primary care settings.

Introduction

Importance of pharmacist competency in primary health care setting

Pharmacists play an important role in primary health care [1]. In primary health care settings, Pharmacists as a team members engage in direct patient care and medication management services (MMS) for ambulatory patients, development of long-term relationships, coordination of care, patient advocacy, wellness and health promotion, triage and referral, and patient education and self-management [2].

Globally, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the role of pharmacists in primary health care is becoming vital because they support primary health care in meeting the elevated burden of chronic care [1]. The Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) framework has identified providers’ competence as a critical driver to improve PHC performance [3]. In economic terms, an Australian study on the economic impact of increased clinical intervention rates in community pharmacies found that adequately trained and remunerated pharmacists generated savings (on health care, medicines, and pharmacy practice costs) six times greater than those of a control group with no access to the same education or remuneration. It was estimated that adequately trained and remunerated pharmacists would save the health care system 15 million Australian dollars (approx. US$100 million) a year [4]. Similar findings are reported from the USA [5]. Hence, the role of competent pharmacists in PHC performance is crucial.

Pharmacists

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines pharmacists as “healthcare professionals whose professional responsibilities and accountabilities include seeking to ensure that people derive maximum therapeutic benefit from their treatments with medicines” [6]. A pharmacist usually works in one of the three settings, i) Pharmaceutical Industry, ii) Practice Setting, and iii) Others. Other settings include academics, regulators (government), and clinical research. In a practice setting, there are three areas: Community Pharmacy, Hospital Pharmacy, and Clinical Pharmacy [7]. The Community pharmacist is defined as “an individual currently registered and who works according to legal and ethical guidelines to ensure the correct and safe supply of medical products to the public” [8]. While, hospital pharmacists are defined as a “individual currently registered and who works in a hospital pharmacy service, primarily within the public/private sector and responsible for ensuring the safe, appropriate and cost-effective use of medicines” [8]. In India, Primary health care is being delivered through the Primary health centres, where the hospital pharmacists are in place and contributing in maintaining and improve people’s health by advising and information and supplying prescription medicines. Pharmacists are well established in providing primary health care services in facilities. However, their role and contribution to primary health care teams, including roles in community pharmacy practice, are health care reforms in many countries [9].

In the growth of pharmacy practice in India, the health system is encountering multi-pronged challenges, including a shortage of trained teachers, limited skills demonstration facilities for teaching institutions, poor networking among the teaching institutions, limited pharmacist involvement with the community, limited interaction between clinician and pharmacist in patient management [10]. These challenges hinder pharmacists from acquiring competency and further developing competence in pharmacy practice.

Competence & competency, competency assessment framework and competency assessment tool

Competence is one of the critical determinants of improving health outcomes and Client Satisfaction [11]. Provider’s competence is the state of proficiency to perform the required practice activities to the defined standard, which includes the requisite competencies to successfully and effectively deliver high-quality services [11,12]. Providers or individuals develop competence through education, training, and work experience [13]. However, competency is the ability of a person to integrate knowledge, skills, and attitudes in their performance of the tasks in a given context [12]. Competence is dynamic and multidimensional, changing with time, experience, and context/ setting, while competencies are durable, trainable, and measurable through the expression of behaviors. The World Health Organization defines a competency framework “as an organized and structured representation of a set of interrelated and purposeful competencies” [12].

Status of existing pharmacist competency assessment in primary health care settings

In Australia, professional bodies such as the royal pharmaceutical society (RPS) and the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia (PSA) have developed role descriptions and mapped the competencies for General Practice pharmacists [14]. In Canada, the Association of Faculties of Pharmacy (AFPC) educational outcomes for Canadian pharmacists have illustrated the competencies expected of pharmacists in the primary health care setting, either in the community or the primary health care team [9]. Similarly, In the United States of America, the role and competencies of pharmacist working in Primary Care has also been listed [2]. The United Kingdom has also invested in integrating the clinical pharmacist into general practice since 2019, primarily to meet the workforce shortage [15]. Similarly, In the Netherlands, the Clinical Pharmacist has already been part of General practice [16]. Saudi Arabia has identified the competencies of Primary Care pharmacists for adults and paediatrics [17].

Many countries, primarily the global North and a few from the global South have defined the roles and competencies of Pharmacists in Primary Health Care settings [18]. Apart from that, in 2010, The International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) also developed the comprehensive Global Competency Framework for the services provided by Pharmacy Workforce, which is widely used globally [13].

Availability of pharmacists in primary health care in India

India National Health Profile, 2022 reports that the total number of registered pharmacists in India until 2021 was 1,334,198. Of these, 24135 pharmacists were employed in public primary health centers [19]. The study conducted in Andhra Pradesh recorded that Primary health centers are experiencing a shortage of 13.3% of pharmacists as per Indian Public health standards [20].

Rationale- why do we need a pharmacist competency assessment framework for India

Healthcare need is increasing because of rising global chronic conditions. This has forced the health system to extend primary Care Services to make them more comprehensive to serve the population need [21]. Understanding the critical role of pharmacists, the UK, Canada, The Netherlands, and other countries have invested in pharmacists to build competencies to improve its performance and meet the primary healthcare needs.

However, in LMICs, it is yet to begin, including India. In India, the situation is further complicated by the double burden of infectious and non-communicable diseases and increasing anti-microbial resistance [22,23]. Due to this, under the comprehensive primary health care package, twelve services have been provisioned in public primary health care institutions. It has significantly increased the pharmacist challenges in delivering health services, which were already facing challenges in competencies due to pre-service education and in-Service training [24].

Identifying the pharmacist’s competency gap is critical for its capacitation in which the Competency Assessment Framework plays a significant role by assessing its competencies. Currently, no pharmacist competency assessment framework exists for Indian settings that can be used to assess competency for in-service pharmacists in primary health care. Hence, developing a competency assessment framework will bridge this gap, which will further help capacitate Primary Health Care Pharmacists.

Study objective

The objective of this study was “to develop the competency assessment framework to assess the In-Service Pharmacist competency in public Primary Health Care setting.” The specific objective was to identify Pharmacists’ competencies and develop Competency Assessment Tools for in-service pharmacists in public primary healthcare settings.

Methods

Study design

We followed a five-stage Fig 1 consultative process to develop the Pharmacist competency assessment framework. The stage-wise details are as below.

Fig 1. Study Stages.

Fig 1

Stage 1 competency identification

In this phase, we did a systematic literature review Fig 2 to identify the Pharmacists’ competencies in the primary health care setting to identify the scientific and grey literature between 2000 to 2020 on PubMed and SSRN. For PubMed, we used the search strategy as; (((“Primary Health Care/education” [Mesh] OR “Primary Health Care/standards”[Mesh])) AND “Pharmacists”[Mesh]) AND (“Professional Competence”[Mesh] OR “Clinical Competence”[Mesh] OR “Cultural Competency”[Mesh] OR “Social Skills”[Mesh]). Two extra filters were used, English and Humans. This strategy retrieved four papers. Similarly, for SSRN, “Pharmacist” as a title was searched, and then “Competence.” This search retrieved only one paper. Google Scholar was also used to retrieve papers using two search strategies; “Primary Care Pharmacist Competency” and “Community Pharmacist Competency.” Through this, 14 and seven papers were retrieved, respectively. Because the competencies have been minimally explored scientifically and are primarily available as guiding documents, Google has been used to search such literature [25]. Through this, 11 papers were retrieved. 38 papers were found from all the sources, of which five were duplicates. The remaining 33 articles were studied in detail, and later, twenty-five articles were removed. Finally, thirteen articles were selected that illustrated at least one domain of Pharmacist Competencies.

Fig 2. PRISMA Selection of Studies.

Fig 2

Stage-2 Expert Consultation: to build consensus on Competencies: In the second stage, we organized expert consultation to build consensus on Competencies and behaviours. This consultation was held virtually on 10th March 2022.

Stage 3 Competency Assessment Tool Development: In this stage, based on the literature, we developed the Instruments to assess the Competencies and their associated behaviors in terms of knowledge, attitude, and skills. These include a questionnaire, observation checklists, mini-clinical exercises and simulation exercises.

Stage 4 Expert Consultation: to build consensus on CAT: In this phase, we organized expert consultation on 14th November 2022 in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, to achieve consensus on Competency Assessment Tool instruments.

Stage-5 Pretesting of Competency Assessment Tool:–After converting the English version of the Competency Assessment Tool into a Bilingual language, i.e., English and Odia (Vernacular Language), we pretested it in One of the public primary health care setting facilities in Odisha, on 13th January 2023.

Experts: During two rounds of expert consultations, twenty experts participated. All the experts were trained Pharmacists and have been involved in delivering Pharmacy services in Primary Health Care Settings or as academia in Pharmacy education or involved in the process of policy making as a multi-lateral organization representative or professional body representative or policy maker with over 20 Years of experience.

During the consultations, we obtained written consent from experts. Since we did not collect data from human participants, this study may be exempt from ethics committee approval.

Results

Stage -1 competencies identification

Through literature, we found 175 behaviours under 20 competencies, distributed among four domains like: Pharmaceutical Health, Pharmaceutical Care, Organization and Management, and Professional/personal. Under the pharmaceutical health domain, health promotion is one of the competencies. There are three behaviours; to assess primary healthcare needs; to advise on health promotion, disease prevention, and control, and a healthy lifestyle; and to provide training programs for community staff and leaders on knowledge and skills for promoting health. Please refer to Table 1 for domains and their associated competencies and refer to S1 File for the detailed list of behaviours.

Table 1. Domains and competencies.

Domains Competencies References
Pharmaceutical Health Health Promotion [13,2631]
Medicine Information and advice [13,26,2830,32]
Pharmaceutical Care Assessment of Medicines [13,27,28,30]
Compounding Medicines [13,26,29,30,32]
Dispensing [13,27,28,30]
Medicines [13,27,32]
Monitor Medicines Therapy [13,27,29,32]
Patient Consultation and diagnostics [13,27,28,30,32]
Organisation and Management Budget and reimbursement [13,30,33]
Human Resource Management [13,30,32]
Service Improvement [13,26,28,30]
Procurement [13,26]
Supply Chain and management [13,26,28,30]
Workplace Management [13,2636]
Professional/ Personal Communications Skills [13,2631,3436]
Continuing Professional Development [13,28,30,31,34,35]
Legal and Regulatory Practice [13,2628,33]
Professional and ethical practice [13,2629,35]
Quality Assurance and Research [13, 26,28,29,35]
Self-Management [13,2629,35,36]

Stage-2 expert consultation

Expert consultation was organized to build consensus among experts on pharmacist competencies and their associated behaviours. However, it emerged during the consultation that role plays a significant role in defining in-service competencies for any cadre of professionals. The consensus was made for eleven roles of Pharmacists in primary health care settings Table 2. After that, competencies and their associated behaviours were discussed, and consensus was achieved.

Table 2. Pharmacist role.

Pharmacist Role in Indian Primary health care setting
  1. Pharmacy Management

  2. Dispensing Medical Products

  3. Ensure compliance with regulations on Medical Products

  4. Assistance to Medical Officers in the preparation and implementation of different projects and programs

  5. Outreach to the Community

  6. Professional Practice

  7. Ethical Practice

  8. Communication

  9. Workplace Management

  10. Emergency Role

  11. Continuing Professional Development.

Role-1. Pharmacy Management:

In this role, during the consultation, we arrived at the Consensus on nine competencies and fifty-five behaviours, Table 3. In managing a Pharmacy, one of the critical Competencies is Knowledge about the Pharmacy, infrastructure, layout, and how to adapt it to optimize pharmacy services, including inventory management. Equally, knowing the drugs, consumables, and materials to be kept in store, their nature, use, and required storage conditions are important in managing pharmacy. Other competencies for Pharmacists in pharmacy management are maintenance of storage conditions, planning and procurement, inventory management, store verification, condemnation, and maintenance of registers and records. Knowledge about the Not of Standard Quality (NSQ) Medical Products and how to act appropriately is another vital competency for pharmacists in managing pharmacy. In this digital age, it is difficult for pharmacists to avoid the Competency around digital literacy, which helps maintain IT Based Supply chain systems like Drugs and Vaccine Distribution Management System (DVDMS) and e-Niramaya. Considering the limited expertise about medical products at the primary health centre level, Pharmacists should have the Competency to attend different committees’ meetings like Pharmacy (drug) and therapeutic committee, Annual Indent committee, Purchase committee, Condemnation committee, and Prescription audit committee.

Table 3. Pharmacy management competencies.
  1. Knowledgeable about the Pharmacy layout, pharmacy infrastructure, and how to adapt it to optimize pharmacy services, including inventory management.

  2. Knowledgeable about drugs, consumables, and materials to be kept in store, their nature, use, and storage conditions required.

  3. Be able to maintain and ensure the required storage conditions.

  4. Knowledgeable about the procedure for all types of planning and procurement (Pool Procurement)

  5. Able to manage the inventory correctly.

  6. Able to perform and fulfil the duties as a member of different committees in the institution or representing it.

  7. Able to manage drugs and vaccine Distribution Management system (DVDMS)/eNiramaya, and other existing IT systems (Adequate digital literacy)

  8. Able to conduct institutional store verification, condemnation, and maintenance of all registers and records relevant to the Pharmacy and pharmacy store.

  9. Knowledgeable about the information and directions from authorities relating to banned and Not of Standard Quality (NSQ) medicines and acting appropriately

Role 2: Dispensing Medical Products:

During the consultation regarding this pharmacist’s role in dispensing medical products, the consensus arrived at five competencies, Table 4, and sixteen behaviours, S2 File. One of the critical competencies is knowledge about drug details for dispensing, including generic/brand names, usage (Indication), dosage (Quantity and frequency), route of administration, how to use, and drug interaction/compatibility. However, Pharmacists also need to monitor the medical products’ use and patient adherence, as appropriate, to ensure positive clinical outcomes. To improve patient adherence to medical products, Pharmacists need to encourage and facilitate. Hence, it is also identified as a competency. Another competency for pharmacists is recognizing the adverse drug reaction and supporting the primary health care team in managing the adverse reaction event.

Table 4. Dispensing medical products competencies.
  1. Knowledgeable about medical products details for dispensing, including generic/brand names, usage (Indication), dosage (Quantity and frequency), route of administration, how to use and drug interaction/compatibility,

  2. Able to monitor medical product use and patient adherence, as appropriate, to ensure positive clinical outcomes.

  3. Encourage and facilitate the patient for medication adherence.

  4. Able to encourage use of medical products.

  5. Able to recognize and support the Primary Health Care team in managing adverse drug reactions

Role-3 Ensure compliance with regulations on Medical Products:

Medical products are a highly regulated commodity hence, dealing with them requires compliance with the applied regulations. Towards that, the consensus among the experts made during the consultation is that the Pharmacists in the primary health care setting should be able to guide the primary health care team of the health facility to ensure compliance with laws and regulations as applicable to the medical products, particularly medical products with the narcotics and psychotropic agents. Under this, the consensus was also made on five behaviours S2 File.

Role 4. Assistance to Medical Officer in preparation and implementation of different projects and Programs:

As a Pharmacist in a Primary Health Care setting, one role is to assist Medical Officer in preparing and implementing various health projects and programs, particularly in medical products management and its documentation. For details, please refer S2 File.

Role 5. Outreach to the Community:

In this role, the consensus among the experts was made on two competencies and five behaviours, S2 File. One of them is to assist the primary health care team in organizing community outreach camps. During a disaster, pharmacists’ roles become vital; another competency for Pharmacists is supporting the primary healthcare team in disaster management preparedness.

Role-6 Professional Practice:

During the consultation, the experts unanimously agreed that Pharmacists should necessarily be knowledgeable about roles and responsibilities. Consensus was also reached on one behaviour S2 File.

Role-7 Ethical Practice:

Ethical practice is central to delivering health services. Towards that, the consensus among the experts was made that the Pharmacist should be able to comply with ethical practices as a competency. The agreement was also made on three behaviours S2 File. One of the behaviour is the pharmacists need to be well versed with the of the Pharmacy Council of India Code of Ethics and as given in Pharmacy Practice Regulation.

Role-8 Communication:

The Consensus among the experts during the consultation was that the Pharmacist should be able to communicate effectively in routine and emergencies. The Consensus among the experts was also made on the seven behaviours S2 File.

Role-9 Workplace Management:

Workplace management is one of the typical roles that a pharmacist must play in a Primary Health Care Setting. For that, Consensus arrived during the consultation that one competency which every pharmacist should be able to manage the workplace. There were five behaviours on which the expert agreed. S2 File.

Role-10 Emergency Role:

Under the emergency role, the Consensus among the experts during the consultation was made on three competencies. Pharmacists should essentially have the Competency to perform basic diagnostic tests/ Checks (Diagnostic tests include carrying out Point of Care tests like Blood pressure, Blood Glucose level using Glucometer, Pulse Oximetry, Peak flow tests, Weight, height checks and BMI Calculations, Snellen’s Chart, Pulse, Respiration Rate, Hb using strips, Pregnancy testing, other spot tests using testing kits, etc.), support other health professionals, and handle medical devices/equipment. The government of Odisha, India, has permitted Pharmacists to provide treatment services for minor ailments without doctors [37]. Considering this state government initiative and the need, the experts arrived at the Consensus that pharmacists should also have the competencies to manage minor ailments by recommending medical products for diseases like `Fever, Malaria, Upper Respiratory Tract Infection, Skin diseases (Scabies, Ringworms), Helminthiasis, Acid Peptic Disease (APD), Diarrhoea, Minor Injury without Medico-Legal Cases, Superficial burns without Medico-Legal Cases (MLC), Drainage of abscess, etc. Regarding six behaviours in this role, experts arrived at consensus during the consultation.

Role 11. Continuing Professional Development:

Health Services updates procedures and medical products based on global scientific advancements. Accordingly, the government and other stakeholders keep revising the guidelines. Understanding the volatility of different competencies, experts agreed that the Pharmacist should be willing to participate in Continuing Professional Education/ Development programs to update knowledge and practice. Experts also agreed on two behaviours for the said competency.

Stage -3. Competency assessment tool (CAT) development

In this stage, to assess Pharmacist Competency based on literature, we developed Competency Assessment Tool. We developed the questionnaire to assess the Pharmacist’s knowledge and attitude; under this, 256 questions were constructed, Table 5. The 143 questions were for knowledge, and the rest 113 were for attitude. Further, to assess the Pharmacist’s skills, we used three assessment instruments, Observational Checklists, Mini Clinical Evaluations for Specific Conditions, and Simulation exercises [12,38]. Under Observation, we identified twenty-four skills; under mini-clinical evaluation exercises, we identified thirty skills and four skills under simulation exercises. For the Observation and Mini Clinical Evaluation of selected conditions, we identified the tracer elements for the skills and listed them as means of verification. To standardize the score based on means of verification, we developed the standard score definitions, Table 6 for observations and mini-clinical evaluation of selected conditions.

Table 5. Competency assessment tool-instrument details.

Competency Elements Instruments Number of Questions/ Skills
Pre-Consultation Post Consultation
Knowledge Questionnaire 143 48
Attitude Questionnaire 113 48
Skills Observational Checklist 24 20
Mini Clinical Exercises for Specific Conditions 30 30
Simulation Exercises 4 4

Table 6. Score definition.

Score Definition

  • A

    None—No demonstrated skills at all/does not perform the task(s) completely.

  • B

    Limited Demonstrated very limited strengths/skills in this area.

  • C

    Some—Demonstrated some ability/skills in this area.

  • D

    Strong—Demonstrated strong skills/strength in this area.

  • E

    Excellent—Demonstrated excellent skills/strength in this area.

  • F

    Not applicable

  • G

    Don’t know- not even heard about that skill.

  • H

    Skill limitation is related to resource limitations

Stage-4 expert consultation

In this stage, to develop the consensus among the experts on the Competency Assessment Tool, we organized an expert consultation on Nov 14, 2022, in Bhubaneswar. Consensus arrived on the Ninety-Six Questions during this consultation to assess knowledge and attitude. Out of ninety-six, forty-eight were for knowledge, while the rest were for attitude. On Observational skills, Consensus arrived at 20 skills, while it was thirty for Mini Clinical evaluation for specific conditions. For Simulation exercises, experts were in a consensus for all four skills, Table 5.

Stage-5 CAT pre-testing

In this stage, the English version of CAT was converted into the bilingual format in English and Odia, S3 File. After that, we pre-tested in one of the public primary health care settings facilities in Khorda district, Odisha, India. We found that technical words like inventory management, not of Standard Quality, Supply Chain, prescription error, and prescription validation were comparatively more understandable in English than in Odia. We also understood that in place of the Drugs and Vaccines Distribution Management System (DVDMS), E-Niramaya, an IT-based supply chain system, is being used at the facility level. Accommodating these learnings, we developed the final version of bilingual CAT.

Discussion

We developed the competency assessment framework for In-Service pharmacists in primary healthcare settings. Under this, we identified the role-based competencies and their associated behaviours. Along with the competencies and their related behaviours, we developed the assessment tool to determine the degree of competency among in-Service pharmacists. In this way, this assessment framework will be helpful for policymakers and implementers in designing, monitoring, and evaluating pharmacist competencies. It will further improve pharmacist performance in the primary healthcare facilities.

Factors Influencing Pharmacist Competency: One of the factors that influence pharmacist competency the most is pre-service education. Teaching institutions engaged in pharmacist production face challenges in ensuring the availability of trained teachers. Qualified teachers who have exposure to be in the practice domain are very limited. Acquiring skills is not possible unless the teaching institutions have skills demonstration facilities. The shortage of skill demonstration facilities is also becoming a hindrance to developing skills during pre-service education and further prevents Pharmacists from entering pharmacy practice [10]. Another challenge of Pre-service education is the outdated curriculum and education regulations [39].

The National Education Policy 2020 emphasizes the importance of skill-based training in pharmacy education. Therefore, it is essential for the Pharmacy Council of India, the apex body responsible for regulating education and the profession in India, to update the pharmacy curriculum based on current health industry requirements [40]. In 2020, the curriculum for the diploma in pharmacy was revised for the first time in three decades. To prevent such lengthy delays in the future, the Pharmacy Council of India should establish a mechanism for periodically reviewing and updating curricula to align with industry and health sector needs.

The University Grants Commission (UGC) of the Government of India is tasked with ensuring quality in higher education, including pharmacy programs. One of its key responsibilities of UGC is to maintain teaching standards in higher education [41]. To address the impending shortage of skilled pharmacy educators, the UGC could design programs focused on enhancing the teaching competencies of pharmacy instructors. This initiative would undoubtedly help improve the overall quality of pharmacy education.

For the public health system, the Union and State governments have attempted to capacitate in-service Pharmacists except under the Revised National Tuberculosis Training Program [42]. Some States have made specific efforts to capacitate pharmacists, but even those efforts were limited to Store Management and Rational use of Drugs [43].

Importance of competency assessment framework in developing competency-based training for pharmacists

The Competency assessment framework is the foundation for designing competency-based training (CBT) program for pharmacists, which helps them in improving their performance, irrespective of the settings [44]. The framework provides structured tool to assess the competencies in terms of knowledge, attitude, and skills and helps to understand the role in which the pharmacist is experiencing competency gaps with specific knowledge, attitude, and skills. The framework also helps design competency-based training manuals and develop a pool of trainers to capacitate and bridge the competency gaps.

In India, there are lacunae in the design of the training program for capacitating in-service pharmacist [45]. Competency-based training (CBT), a structured training and assessment system that allows individuals to acquire skills and knowledge to perform work activities to a specified standard, is a globally accepted solution to capacitate the in-service professional [46]. For which the developed Competency assessment framework, based on the role-based competencies and their behaviour, along with the competency assessment tool, will play a foundational role in developing the Competency-based training manual and other resource materials for Pharmacists in primary health Care Settings.

Strengths and limitations

The strength of this study is the consultative approach through which the Competency assessment framework has been developed. In this process, twenty experts in community pharmacy took part. These experts have over 20 Years of experience in teaching, policymaking, and practice from Teaching Institutions, Union and State Governments, professional bodies, Private retail pharmacy, and Public Primary Health Care facilities. In both consultations, twenty experts participated; hence, we recognize that the experts who participated in this study cannot be considered the complete representation of all the stakeholders for the In-Service Pharmacist Competency development initiative.

In method, In the first stage to identify literature-based competencies, we searched the literature from 2000 to 2020. We likely missed some of the relevant old and recent pieces of literature. Attitude assessment of a professional is a complex process; however, we developed the questionnaire to assess Pharmacists’ attitudes. It is possible that the questionnaire to assess attitude cannot capture the responses entirely and accurately.

Apart from that, we did not use any tool to check the validity of the score definition for Skills assessment (Observation and Mini Clinical Exercises). We also understand that we pre-tested CAT in only one public facility in Odisha, India, and did not use any quantitative tool to check its validity.

The developed competency assessment framework is comprehensive. Hence, administering CAT to assess in-service pharmacist competency is time-consuming. As professionals’ role evolves over time based on service requirements, this competency assessment framework will need periodic review and updating.

For the first time, this study has developed role-based competencies and competency assessment tools for in-service pharmacists in the Indian context; hence, if any new addition happens with the Pharmacist role, based on the extended role, the competencies, and their associated behaviours must be included accordingly.

Conclusion

This study has developed a competency assessment framework for in-service primary healthcare pharmacists. It includes a set of competencies and a competency assessment tool designed to evaluate these competencies. The competencies and associated behaviors have been defined based on the roles of in-service pharmacists. The competency assessment tool evaluates pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills to assess their competencies.

The competency assessment framework will help identify the training needs of in-service pharmacists in primary healthcare settings. It will also assist the primary healthcare system in designing competency-based training programs. This type of training is expected to enhance pharmacists’ competencies, ultimately improving the quality of services provided in primary healthcare facilities.

Practice Implication: Using this Competency Assessment framework, the health system implementers can identify the gap in serving Pharmacists’ competencies in primary health care settings. Further, it can be instrumental in developing and designing competency-based training to upskill them.

Supporting information

S1 File. This is the S1 File literature based competencies and its behaviour List.

(PDF)

pone.0316646.s001.pdf (454.7KB, pdf)
S2 File. This is the S1 File pharmacists role based competencies and behaviours List.

(PDF)

pone.0316646.s002.pdf (529.6KB, pdf)
S3 File. This is the S1 File competency assessment tool.

(PDF)

pone.0316646.s003.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Rajeev Sadanandan, Dr. N. Devadasan, Mr. Sunil Nandraj, Dr. Kumaravel Ilangovan, Ms. Pallavi Gupta from HSTP for their useful suggestions on development of this paper. We also recognize the contributions of the experts who participated in the study consultations.

Abbreviations

LMIC

Low- and middle-Income Countries

PHC

Primary health care

WHO

World Health Organization

PSA

Pharmaceutical Society of Australia

AFPC

Association of Faculties of Pharmacy

CAT

Competency Assessment Tool

CBT

Competency-based Training

FIP

International Pharmaceutical Federation

NSQ

Not of Standard Quality

HSTP

Health Systems Transformation Platform

CPD-IPA

Community Pharmacy Division, Indian Pharmaceutical Association

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

Decision Letter 0

Naeem Mubarak

22 Oct 2024

PONE-D-24-33395Developing a competency assessment framework for pharmacists in primary health care settings in IndiaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kumar,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 06 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Naeem Mubarak, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. 3. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section: "Authors with competing interests" Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.  Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 4. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.] Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition). For example, authors should submit the following data: - The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;- The values used to build graphs;- The points extracted from images for analysis. Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study. If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories. If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access. 5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments:

The manuscript has strengths but needs major revisions to improve its quality and merit.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you, managing editorial, for giving me this opportunity to review the article “Developing a competency assessment framework for pharmacists in primary health care settings in India” in this prestigious journal. This article provides the initial primary stages and roles for developing the competency assessment framework for primary health care in India.

Abstract

In the background, it's crucial to highlight the significance of the competency framework for pharmacists, as it underpins their professional development and performance.

The method of assessment was insufficiently described.

To whom were the competency framework and associated behaviour discussed and agreed upon? Please clarify the statement.

In general, there is a lack of information about the competencies, just the number of competencies and the number of roles. Kindly add some lines in the result or conclusion about which competency framework for pharmacists has been introduced.

Introduction

Please add an example from the primary rather than the community set-up to elaborate on the importance of competency at the primary healthcare level.

Add a few lines about the availability of pharmacists at the primary healthcare level and then explain their importance to their country's prospects.

The authors are advised to specify the status of pharmacists at their country level because these studies are of Indian origin. So, the targeted approach will be more important than covering the whole world.

Please advise the authors to reference the statements, as no competency assessment has already been conducted in their country.

There is no introduction regarding the competency tool and globally available competencies for pharmacists at the primary level.

Method

Authors are advised to use the assessment tool for literature review for effective data collection and representation.

In stage two, on which basis the experts were selected for consultation.

In stage three, which instrument was used for assessing competencies? Please specify.

There should be numbered score definitions in the assessment tool.

Is there only English grammar pretesting required for the competency assessment tool?

Results

The competencies selected in the literature review are related to the in-service pharmacist or not. These competencies were related to pharmacists or taken as general.

On which basis were the eleven roles made for pharmacist competencies, and on which bases were they selected?

In role 2, how is it possible for a pharmacist to observe the optimal use of medical products?

In role 3, please specify which drugs require high compliance with regulations.

In role 4, although medical product management and documentation are solely the responsibility of the pharmacist as they are available in the pharmacy, the pharmacist assists the medical officer with these tasks.

In role 7, on which limit the ethical practice will be allowed. Please specified.

In role 10, Is it possible for the author to please specify the list of diagnostic tests and checks in emergencies?

In role 11, authors are advised to please specify the programs for continuing professional development in Indian origin.

Authors are advised to reduce the paragraph content as already described in the table.

Authors are advised to provide the details of the validation of the competency assessment tool.

Which tests were performed during the pre-testing of the competency assessment tool?

Discussion

The discussion regarding the factors related to coping with pre-service education is limited. The authors advised adding more possible measures to cope with these challenges at the government level.

The discussion regarding the importance and implications of competence assessment was very limited, making this portion weak.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0316646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316646.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Nov 2024

Sr. No. Section Comments Response Description-Response (Page and Line Number

1. Abstract In the background, it's crucial to highlight the significance of the competency framework for pharmacists, as it underpins their professional development and performance. Referring to the suggestion, I made the required changes. Please refer to ln No. 35 to 40 on page 2

2 The method of assessment was insufficiently described. Referring to the suggestion, I made the required changes. Please refer to ln No. 42 to 49 on page 2

3 To whom were the competency framework and associated behaviour discussed and agreed upon? Please clarify the statement. Referring to the suggestion, I made the required changes. Please refer to ln No. 53 to 54 on page 2

4 In general, there is a lack of information about the competencies, just the number of competencies and the number of roles. Kindly add some lines in the result or conclusion about which competency framework for pharmacists has been introduced. Referring to the suggestion, I made the required changes. Please refer to ln No. 88 to 101 on page 3.

5 Introduction Please add an example from the primary rather than the community set-up to elaborate on the importance of competency at the primary healthcare level. I tried my best to include articles from primary healthcare settings.

6 Add a few lines about the availability of pharmacists at the primary healthcare level and then explain their importance to their country's prospects. Referring the suggestion, made the necessary changes. Please refer to ln No. 198 to 202 on page 6.

7 The authors are advised to specify the status of pharmacists at their country level because these studies are of Indian origin. So, the targeted approach will be more important than covering the whole world. Yes, I tried my best to share status in an Indian setting Please refer to ln No. 211 to 217 on page 6.

8 Please advise the authors to reference the statements, as no competency assessment has already been conducted in their country We learned from literature search and expert consultation that there is no competency assessment framework.

9 There is no introduction regarding the competency tool and globally available competencies for pharmacists at the primary level. We discussed about the FIP competency framework and later in stage 1, we listed the competencies under different domains from various studies. Please refer to ln No. 179 to 197 on pages 5 and 6.

10 Method Authors are advised to use the assessment tool for literature review for effective data collection and representation. In stage 1, we used a systematic approach to searching literature through a defined search strategy and followed PRISMA guidelines. Please refer to Fig 1 for details.

11 In stage two, on which basis the experts were selected for consultation? We identified experts based on selection criteria such as education, years of experience, and current role. Please refer to the experts section. Please refer to ln No. 277 to 281 on page 8.

12 In stage three, which instrument was used for assessing competencies? Please specify. Referring to the suggestion, we made the changes. Please refer to ln No. 268 to 269 on page 8.

13 There should be numbered score definitions in the assessment tool. We developed the score definition for the instruments assessing skills as Observational checklists and mini-clinical exercises. Please refer to table 8 Score definition. Please refer to table 5 on page 14

14 Is there only English grammar pretesting required for the competency assessment tool? No, we pre-tested the competency assessment tool in bilingual format in English and Odia. Please refer to ln no 466 and 467.

15 Results The competencies selected in the literature review are related to the in-service pharmacist or not. These competencies were related to pharmacists or taken as general. Yes, the literature review is related to the pharmacists working in primary health care settings.

16 On which basis were the eleven roles made for pharmacist competencies, and on which bases were they selected? In stage 2, during the consultation, it emerged that rather than considering the domain, it is better to use the role as a basis to define competencies. These roles are primarily based on the Indian Public Health Standard, 2022, and later on, the consensus among experts, 11 roles were finalized. Please refer to ln no 318-320 on page 9.

17 In role 2, how is it possible for a pharmacist to observe the optimal use of medical products? In role 2, one of the competencies is- Able to encourage the use of medical products.

The pharmacist can encourage patients to return unused, unwanted, or expired medicines to the Pharmacy for safe disposal. Pharmacists can also maintain records of returned medical products to monitor usage further.

The additional file mentions these two ways as behaviors for the said competencies. For details, please refer to Additional file 2. Please refer to additional file 2.

18 In role 3, please specify which drugs require high compliance with regulations. Medical products with narcotics and psychotropic agents require high compliance with regulations.

We made the suggested changes. Please refer to ln no 362-363 on page 12.

19 In role 4, although medical product management and documentation are solely the responsibility of the pharmacist as they are available in the pharmacy, the pharmacist assists the medical officer with these tasks. Primary health Centres conduct various activities for public health programs, including Leprosy, Tuberculosis, and Vector disease control programs. In those cases, the Pharmacist is supposed to assist the medical officer with medical product management and documentation.

20 In role 7, on which limit the ethical practice will be allowed. Please specified. Regarding ethical practice, the consensus made among the experts as one of the behaviors is -

“Be well versed with the Code of Ethics of the Pharmacy Council of India and as given in Pharmacy Practice Regulation.” (Please refer to additional file 2 )

Made the required changes in the manuscript. Please refer to additional file 2.

21 In role 10, Is it possible for the author to please specify the list of diagnostic tests and checks in emergencies? We specified the list of diagnostics in the manuscript. These tests are described as behaviors in Additional File 2. Please refer to additional file 2

22 In role 11, authors are advised to please specify the programs for continuing professional development in Indian origin. In India, there is no structured program for pharmacists' continuing professional development. The National Health Mission, along with other initiatives, organizes capacity-building programs regularly. In light of this, one behavior that emerged from expert consensus is actively participating in the various training programs offered by the National Health Mission and other health programs established by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) and State Health Departments.

For details, please refer to additional file 2. Please refer to additional file 2.

23 Authors are advised to reduce the paragraph content as already described in the table. We removed two tables-table 4 and 5.

24 Authors are advised to provide the details of the validation of the competency assessment tool. Which tests were performed during the pre-testing of the competency assessment tool? We developed the CAT using a content validation (Stage 4) approach. Later, under stage 5, we pre-tested the CAT in one of the public health facilities to understand the construct regarding language clarity and local programmatic variations. Please refer to ln no 467 to 475 on pages 15 and 16.

25 Discussion The discussion regarding the factors related to coping with pre-service education is limited. The authors advised adding more possible measures to cope with these challenges at the government level. We made the needful changes. Please refer to ln no 493 to 515 on pages 16 and 17.

26 The discussion regarding the importance and implications of competence assessment was very limited, making this portion weak. We made the needful changes. Please refer to ln no 522 to 536 on page 17.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0316646.s004.docx (20.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Naeem Mubarak

16 Dec 2024

Developing a competency assessment framework for pharmacists in primary health care settings in India

PONE-D-24-33395R1

Dear Dr. Sanjeev Kumar,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Naeem Mubarak, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The manuscript requires no further changes.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The author has thoroughly addressed all the comments and suggestions. After reviewing the updated manuscript, I find the revisions satisfactory and in line with the objectives of the work. At this stage, I have no further suggestions or comments to add.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Naeem Mubarak

PONE-D-24-33395R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kumar,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr Naeem Mubarak

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. This is the S1 File literature based competencies and its behaviour List.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316646.s001.pdf (454.7KB, pdf)
    S2 File. This is the S1 File pharmacists role based competencies and behaviours List.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316646.s002.pdf (529.6KB, pdf)
    S3 File. This is the S1 File competency assessment tool.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316646.s003.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0316646.s004.docx (20.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES