Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research logoLink to Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research
. 1998 Jan;62(1):33–37.

Serological classification and virulence determination of Dichelobacter nodosus isolated from Alberta and British Columbia sheep.

M E Olson 1, M S Gard 1, J Gradin 1, D W Morck 1
PMCID: PMC1189439  PMID: 9442937

Abstract

Ovine footrot is a contagious disease of sheep that occurs in temperature climates. It is caused by the strict anaerobe, Dichelobacter nodosus. Benign and virulent organisms are differentiated according to serotype and protease production. This study was conducted to identify the presence of virulent serotypes of D. nodosus in sheep flocks in Alberta and British Columbia. Dichelobacter nodosus was detected in lame sheep from 11 of 15 (73%) flocks in Alberta and in 4 of 5 (80%) British Columbia flocks. It was recovered from 57 of 107 (53%) lame sheep. In Alberta, 4 distinct serotypes were isolated from the 11 positive flocks while in British Columbia a total of 6 different serotypes were isolated. One British Columbia isolate could not be classified into existing serotypes. Of the 19 field strains tested, all but 3 were defined as virulent based upon the rapid rise in protease activity in vitro which was maintained between 3 and 5 d. The knowledge of the serotype and virulence of the D. nodosus isolated from affected animals can assist in the control and prevention of ovine footrot.

Full text

PDF
33

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Depiazzi L. J., Richards R. B. A degrading proteinase test to distinguish benign and virulent ovine isolates of Bacteroides nodosus. Aust Vet J. 1979 Jan;55(1):25–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1979.tb09541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Depiazzi L. J., Richards R. B., Henderson J., Rood J. I., Palmer M., Penhale W. J. Characterisation of virulent and benign strains of Bacteroides nodosus. Vet Microbiol. 1991 Jan;26(1-2):151–160. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(91)90051-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Egerton J. R., Merritt G. C. Serology of foot-rot: antibodies against Fusiformis nodosus in normal, affected, vaccinated and passively immunised sheep. Aust Vet J. 1973 Mar;49(3):139–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1973.tb06762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gradin J. L., Sonn A. E., Petrovska L. Serogrouping of Bacteroides nodosus isolates from 62 sources in the United States. Am J Vet Res. 1993 Jul;54(7):1069–1073. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lewis R. D., Meyer H. H., Gradin J. L., Smith A. W. Effectiveness of vaccination in controlling ovine footrot. J Anim Sci. 1989 May;67(5):1160–1166. doi: 10.2527/jas1989.6751160x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Morck D. W., Gard M. S., Olson M. E. Experimental evaluation of a commercial footrot vaccine against native Canadian strains of Dichelobacter nodosus. Can J Vet Res. 1994 Apr;58(2):122–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ottow J. C. Ecology, physiology, and genetics of fimbriae and pili. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1975;29:79–108. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.29.100175.000455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rinderknecht H., Geokas M. C., Silverman P., Haverback B. J. A new ultrasensitive method for the determination of proteolytic activity. Clin Chim Acta. 1968 Aug;21(2):197–203. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(68)90127-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roberts D. S., Egerton J. R. The aetiology and pathogenesis of ovine foot-rot. II. The pathogenic association of Fusiformis nodosus and F. necrophorus. J Comp Pathol. 1969 Apr;79(2):217–227. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(69)90008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schmitz J. A., Gradin J. L. Serotypic and biochemical characterization of Bacteroides nodosus isolates from Oregon. Can J Comp Med. 1980 Oct;44(4):440–446. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thorley C. M. A simplified method for the isolation of Bacteroides nodusus from ovine foot-rot and studies on its colony morphology and serology. J Appl Bacteriol. 1976 Jun;40(3):301–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1976.tb04178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES