Abstract
The objective was to determine scrotal and testicular temperatures in rams and how they are affected by ambient temperature (10 degrees C vs 25 degrees C) and scrotal fleece (densely fleeced vs shaved). Scrotal surface temperatures (SST) of the caudal aspect of the shaved hemi-scrotum at 10 degrees C vs 25 degrees C were (mean, degrees C) 28.9 and 30.5 (P < 0.03), 28.2 and 29.6 (P < 0.04), and 26.1 and 27.6 (P < 0.06) at the top, middle and bottom of the testis, respectively. Scrotal subcutaneous temperatures (SQT) on the fleeced vs shaved side were 33.5 and 32.0 (P < 0.02), 32.2 and 31.1 (P < 0.06), and 31.7 and 30.8 (P < 0.09) at the top, middle, and bottom at 10 degrees C; they were 33.9 and 32.1 (P < 0.02), 33.1 and 31.9 (P < 0.05), and 32.5 and 32.0 (P < 0.15) at 25 degrees C. Intratesticular temperatures (ITT; measured only at 25 degrees C) on the fleeced vs shaved side were 35.3 and 35.0 (P < 0.5), 35.5 and 35.2 (P < 0.4), and 35.4 and 35.0 (P < 0.3) at the top, middle, and bottom. Temperature gradients (difference from top to bottom) were greatest for SST (2.8 degrees C), moderate for SQT (1.8 to 0.1 degrees C), and not significant for ITT (-0.1 and 0.1 degrees C). The SST was approximately 1.5 degrees C warmer at all 3 locations at 25 degrees C vs 10 degrees C. Increased ambient temperature affected SQT more at the bottom than at the top. Conversely, the difference in SQT between the fleeced and shaved sides was greatest at the top. The difference in ITT (0.3 degrees C warmer on the fleeced vs the shaved side at all locations) was not significant. Therefore, the magnitude of temperature increase associated with ambient temperature or scrotal fleece was affected by both depth and vertical location.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cook R. B., Coulter G. H., Kastelic J. P. The testicular vascular cone, scrotal thermoregulation, and their relationship to sperm production and seminal quality in beef bulls. Theriogenology. 1994 Feb 2;41(3):653–671. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(94)90175-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kastelic J. P., Cook R. B., Coulter G. H., Saacke R. G. Insulating the scrotal neck affects semen quality and scrotal/testicular temperatures in the bull. Theriogenology. 1996 Apr 1;45(5):935–942. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(96)00023-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kastelic J. P., Cook R. B., Coulter G. H. Scrotal/testicular thermoregulation and the effects of increased testicular temperature in the bull. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1997 Jul;13(2):271–282. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30340-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MOULE G. R., WAITES G. M. Seminal degeneration in the ram and its relation to the temperature of the scrotum. J Reprod Fertil. 1963 Jun;5:433–446. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0050433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voglmayr J. K., Setchell B. P., White I. G. The effects of heat on the metabolism and ultrastructure of ram testicular spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1971 Jan;24(1):71–80. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0240071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]