Abstract
In the Asian general population, at least six single‐nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 gene have been identified: −3279T>G, −53A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA, 211G>A, 686C>A, 1091C>T, and 1456T>G. Each of these six SNVs was observed in at least four ethnic groups of the 12 Asian populations studied. In East Asian populations, the descending frequency of these six SNVs was as follows: −3279G>[−53A(TA)7TAA, 211A]>(686A, 1091T)>1456G. Because of the presence of linkage disequilibrium and the expulsion phenomenon, when the SNVs −3279G, −53A(TA)7TAA, 211A, and 686A were simultaneously involved, 15 instead of the estimated 81 genotypes were observed. Those carrying 686AA or 1456GG developed Gilbert's syndrome or Crigler–Najjar syndrome type 2. Both −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA and 211AA are the main causes of Gilbert's syndrome in East Asian populations. In East Asian populations, the 211AA genotype is the main cause of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, whereas −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA exerts a protective effect on hyperbilirubinemia development in neonates fed with breast milk. Both 211A and −53A(TA)7TAA are significantly associated with adverse drug reactions induced by irinotecan (one of the most widely used anticancer agents) in Asians. However, at least three common SNVs (−3279G, −53A(TA)7TAA, and 211A) should be comprehensively analyzed. This study investigated the clinical significance of these six SNVs and demonstrated that examining UGT1A1 variants in Asian populations is considerably challenging.
Keywords: adverse drug reaction, Gilbert's syndrome, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, single‐nucleotide variants, UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene
1. INTRODUCTION
UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1), the sole enzyme responsible for the glucuronidation of bilirubin in humans, is encoded by the UGT1A1 gene located on chromosome 2q37.1. 1 Bilirubin, the end product of heme catabolism, is primarily obtained through the breakdown of erythrocyte hemoglobin, and it is poorly soluble in water. As illustrated in Figure 1, unconjugated bilirubin is transported by organic anion transport protein 2 (OATP2) to the smooth endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes, where the conjugating enzyme UGT1A1 is localized. Subsequently, unconjugated bilirubin is conjugated with uridine diphosphate glucuronic acid to form mono‐ and di‐glucuronide bilirubin (water soluble); this reaction is catalyzed by UGT1A1. 1 , 2 At the canalicular surface, conjugated bilirubin is efficiently secreted into bile through the ATP‐binding cassette (ABC) multidrug resistance–associated protein (ABCC2/MRP2) transporter. The excretion of conjugated bilirubin at the basolateral surface is mediated by the transporter ABCC3/MRP3. 1 , 2
FIGURE 1.

Mechanism of bilirubin elimination.
Altered and variant UGT1A1 genes can cause fatal or benign types of unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, namely Crigler–Najjar syndrome type 1 (CN‐1), Crigler–Najjar syndrome type 2 (CN‐2), and Gilbert's syndrome (GS). 1 , 2 Moreover, the association of UGT1A1 with the metabolic rate of certain drugs or the risk of cancer has been reported. 2 Therefore, the single‐nucleotide variants (SNVs) of UGT1A1 represent crucial changes to the gene structure.
The cDNA of human UGT1 was cloned in 1991. 1 Genetic defects in UGT1A1 that cause CN‐1, CN‐2, and GS were first reported in 1992, 1993, and 1995, respectively. 1 , 2 Thereafter, many studies have identified genetic defects in UGT1A1 in different populations. In the Asian general population, at least six SNVs of UGT1A1 have been reported 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 : −3279T>G, −53A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA, 211G>A, 686C>A, 1091C>T, and 1456T>G. Table 1 summarizes the distributions of these six SNVs. The SNVs 211G>A, 686C>A, 1091C>T, and 1456T>G have been observed in Asians, but never in Caucasians.
TABLE 1.
MAF for every SNVs of the UGT1A1 gene
| –3279T>G | −536>7 | 211G>A | 686C>A | 1091C>T | 1456T>G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Asia | ||||||
| Chinese 6 , 7 , 8 | 0.320 | 0.118 | 0.185 | 0.014 | 0.021 | 0.003 |
| Chinese Tibetan 9 | N/A a | 0.130 | 0.200 | 0 | 0.085 | 0 |
| Japanese 10 | 0.262 | 0.130 | 0.153 | 0.010 | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Korean 11 , 12 | 0.267 | 0.200 | 0.173 | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.001 |
| Taiwanese 3 , 13 | 0.350 | 0.143 | 0.109 | 0.028 | 0.021 | 0.002 |
| Southern‐East Asia | ||||||
| Indonesian 14 | N/A | 0.095 | 0.048 | 0.030 | 0 | 0 |
| Malaysian Malay 15 | N/A | 0.250 | 0.120 | 0.030 | N/A | N/A |
| South East Asian Malay 16 | 0.432 | N/A | 0.057 | 0.031 | 0.010 | N/A |
| Thai 17 | 0.286 | 0.051 | 0.027 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Vietnamese 18 | N/A | 0.060 | 0.050 | 0 | N/A | N/A |
| Southern Asia | ||||||
| Indian 19 | 0.431 | 0.336 | 0.066 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Central Asia | ||||||
| Uzbek 20 | 0.500 | 0.310 | 0.090 | 0.005 | N/A | N/A |
| West Asia | ||||||
| Saudi 21 | 0.624 | 0.262 | 0 | 0 | N/A | N/A |
Abbreviations: MAF, minor allele frequency; SNV, single‐nucleotide variant; UGT, UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase; 6 > 7, A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA.
Not assayed.
We searched for studies examining genetic defects in UGT1A1 in healthy Asians, patients with GS, and neonates with nonhemolytic unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia that were indexed in PubMed since 1995 and included those in this review. We excluded case reports and review articles. To examine the association among the six SNVs, studies focusing on at least three of the six SNVs were included. A total of 66 studies published until December 31, 2021, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Of the 66 studies, 20 included Chinese populations 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 (two studies also included Chinese Tibetan individuals 9 , 22 ), 4 included Indian populations, 19 , 37 , 38 , 39 2 included Indonesian populations, 14 , 40 12 included Japanese populations 4 , 10 , 20 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 (one study also included individuals from Uzbekistan 20 ), 4 included Korean populations, 11 , 12 , 50 , 51 3 included Malaysian populations, 15 , 16 , 52 1 included Saudi individuals, 21 18 included Taiwanese individuals, 1 , 3 , 13 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 1 included Thai individuals, 17 and 1 included Vietnamese individuals. 18 Moreover, we reviewed all the studies examining the relationship between the variants of UGT1A1 and the adverse drug reaction (ADR) or therapeutic efficacy of irinotecan‐based chemotherapy in Asian patients with colon cancer published in PubMed from 2018 to 2021.
We conducted a comprehensive analysis of UGT1A1 variants in the Asian populations.
2. ALLELE FREQUENCIES AND UGT1A1 ENZYME ACTIVITIES OF THE SIX SNVS
2.1. Allele frequencies
In this review, the minor allele frequency (MAF) of an SNV was collected from healthy adults' data. However, because of the unavailability of data for healthy adults in the Indonesian and Vietnamese populations, we used data obtained from newborns without hyperbilirubinemia for these two ethnic groups. If the MAF of an SNV in an ethnic group was reported in two (or more) studies, the study with a larger sample size was selected as the example for that ethnic group.
Table 1 presents the MAFs of the six SNVs reported for 12 populations: Chinese, 6 , 7 , 8 Chinese Tibetan, 9 Japanese, 10 Korean, 11 , 12 Taiwanese, 3 , 13 Indonesian, 14 Malaysian, 15 , 16 Thai, 17 Vietnamese, 18 Indian, 19 Uzbek, 20 and Saudi. 21 Each of the six SNVs was observed in at least four ethnic groups. The MAF of −3279T>G was higher than 0.430 in the Malaysian, Indian, Uzbek, and Saudi populations (0.431–0.624) but was ≤0.350 in the Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese, and Thai populations (0.262–0.350). The MAF of −53 A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA was ≥0.250 in the Malaysian, Indian, Uzbek, and Saudi populations (0.250–0.336); between 0.118 and 0.200 in the Chinese, Chinese Tibetan, Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese populations; and as low as 0.095, 0.051, and 0.060 in the Indonesian, Thai, and Vietnamese populations, respectively. The MAF of 211G>A was ≤0.090 in the Indonesian, Malaysian, Thai, Vietnamese, Indian, Uzbek, and Saudi populations (0–0.090) but ≥0.109 in the other five ethnic groups (0.109–0.200). The MAF of 686C>A was ≥0.028 in the Taiwanese, Indonesian, and Malaysian populations (0.028–0.031); between 0.010 and 0.014 in the Chinese, Japanese, and Korean populations; and ≤0.005 in the Chinese Tibetan, Vietnamese, Indian, Uzbek, and Saudi populations (0–0.005). The MAF of 1091C>T was as high as 0.085 in the Chinese Tibetan population; between 0.010 and 0.021 in the Chinese, Korean, Taiwanese, and Malaysian populations; and ≤0.005 in the Japanese, Indonesian, and Indian populations (0–0.005). The MAF of 1456T>G was considerably low in the Chinese, Chinese Tibetan, Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese, Indonesian, and Indian populations (0–0.003). The results indicated that the MAFs of the promoter region were higher in the West Asian, Central Asian, and Southern Asian populations than in the East Asian populations, whereas the MAFs of the coding region were higher in the East Asian populations than in the West Asian, Central Asian, and Southern Asian populations.
The geographical origin of the study participants may be responsible for some differences in the genotype distribution of UGT1A1. All the six SNVs observed in the Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese populations were characterized by the descending MAF order of –3279G>[−53A(TA)7TAA, 211A]>(686A, 1091T)>1456G.
2.2. UGT1A1 enzyme activities
The SNVs of UGT1A1 in the promoter area affect the transcription of the enzyme, and those within the coding region cause a change in its expression. UGT1A1 activities for −3279GG, −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA, 211AA, 211GA, 686AA, 1091TT, and 1456GG are listed in Table 2. Those data were obtained from experiments performed to examine the protein expression of cDNAs in COS‐7 monkey kidney cells, except for −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA that was detected in the human hepatoma cell line (HuH7). 1 The UGT1A1 enzyme activity of the 211GA SNV was estimated ([32.2% (activity for 211AA)]1/2) to be 56.7% of normal, which is close to 60.2% of normal for the determined activity. 1 Therefore, the estimated UGT1A1 activities for the heterozygote [(activity for the homozygote)1/2] of the SNVs −3279T>G, −53A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA, 686C>A, 1091C>T, and 1456T>G (Table 2) appear to be reasonable. 1
TABLE 2.
Characteristics of the six SNVs in the UGT1A1 gene
| −3279T>G | −536>7 | 211G>A | 686C>A | 1091C>T | 1456T>G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Promoter | Promoter | Exon 1 | Exon 1 | Exon 4 | Exon 5 |
| Amino acid | No change | No change | Gly71Arg | Pro229Gln | Pro364Leu | Tyr486Asp |
| Allele name | UGT1A1*60 | UGT1A1*28 | UGT1A1*6 | UGT1A1*27 | UGT1A1*63 | UGT1A1*7 |
| Rs number | 4124874 | 8175347 | 4148323 | 35350960 | 34946978 | 34993780 |
| Activity, % of normal |
TG, 77.5 a GG, 60.0 b |
6/7, 50.5 a 7/7, 25.5 c |
GA, 60.2 b AA, 32.2 b |
CA, 37.4 a AA, 14.0 b |
CT, 59.7 a TT, 35.6 b |
TG, 27.6 a GG, 7.6 b |
Abbreviations: SNV, single‐nucleotide variant; UGT, UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase; 6 > 7, A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA; 7/7, A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA.
Estimated value, by calculation [(activity for the homozygote)1/2].
Detected in COS‐7 monkey kidney cells.
Detected in the human hepatoma cell line (HuH7).
3. LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM, EXPULSION PHENOMENON, AND OBSERVED AND NEVER‐OBSERVED GENOTYPES
3.1. Linkage disequilibrium
Several studies examining the linkage disequilibrium of the SNVs of UGT1A1 have been published since 2002. 68 In this review, we observed that the 686 CA genotype was associated with the −53A(TA)6TAA/A(TA)7TAA or −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA SNV. 1 , 10 , 30 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 58 , 59 , 66 , 67 When −3279T>G was considered, 686CA was observed to be closely associated with not only −53A(TA)6TAA/A(TA)7TAA or −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA but also −3279TG or −3279GG. 1 , 66 The 686AA genotype was associated with the −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA SNV, 1 , 56 , 58 and −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA was associated with −3279GG. 1 , 3 , 66 , 68 However, −53A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA was not associated with 686C>A, 1 , 10 , 30 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 58 , 59 , 66 , 67 and −3279T>G was not associated with −53A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA. 1 , 3 , 34 , 66 , 69 In these relationships, the degree of linkage disequilibrium (D′) was high, whereas r 2 was low for the association between −3279G and −53A(TA)7TAA (D′ = 0.95, r 2 = 0.26) and between −53A(TA)7TAA and 686A (D′ = 0.95, r 2 = 0.13). 66 A high D′ but a considerably low r 2 value was noted for the association between 686A and −3279G (D′ = 0.95, r 2 = 0.03). 66
3.2. Expulsion phenomenon
All the studies examining the SNVs 211G>A, −3279T>G, −53A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA, and 686C>A reported that individuals possessing 211AA never carried −3279TG, −3279GG, −53A(TA)6TAA/A(TA)7TAA, −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA, 686CA, or 686AA. Those possessing 211GA never carried −3279GG, −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA, or 686AA. Therefore, the expulsion phenomenon was observed between 211AA and −3279G, between 211AA and −53A(TA)7TAA, and between 211AA and 686A. In addition, the expulsion phenomenon was observed between 211GA and −3279GG, between 211GA and −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA, and between 211GA and 686AA. Such expulsion phenomenon may spontaneously occur in meiosis during the homologous recombination process after fertilization.
3.3. Observed and never‐observed genotypes
Among the six SNVs, −3279G, −53A(TA)7TAA, and 211A were commonly observed because the MAFs of all the three SNVs were ≥0.05, except for in the Indonesian, 14 Thai, 17 and Saudi populations 21 with MAFs of 0.048, 0.027, and 0 for 211A, respectively (Table 1). Linkage disequilibrium was observed in the SNVs −3279G, −53A(TA)7TAA, and 686A. Therefore, the four SNVs at nucleotides −3279, −53, 686, and 211 in UGT1A1 were combined for further analysis. When the three SNVs at nucleotides −53, 686, and 211 were combined, the estimated number of genotypes was 27 (33). However, for those carrying −3279TT, −3279TG, and −3279GG, only three, six, and six genotypes of the SNVs for combined nucleotides (−53/686/211) were noted, respectively (Figure 2). Therefore, among the estimated 81 (34) genotypes for the combination of the four SNVs at nucleotides −3279, −53, 686, and 211, a total of 15 genotypes were observed, whereas the other 66 genotypes were never observed (Table 3).
FIGURE 2.

The 15 observed genotypes (combination of the four SNVs at nucleotides −3279, −53, 686, and 211 in UGT1A1) [green color: Wild type, blue color: Heterozygote, red color: Homozygote; 6/6, A(TA)6TAA/A(TA)6TAA; 6/7, A(TA)6TAA/A(TA)7TAA; 7/7, A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA].
TABLE 3.
Estimated, observed and never‐observed genotypes by combination of four SNVs at nucleotides 686, −53, −3279, and 211 in the UGT1A1 gene
| Combined SNVs at nucleotides | N estimated genotypes | Genotypes observed | Genotypes never observed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 686AA | −53, −3279, and 211 | 27 | −53(7/7)/−3279GG/211GG | Other 26 estimated‐genotypes |
| 686CA | −53, −3279, and 211 | 27 | −53(6/7)/−3279TG/211GG, −53(6/7)/−3279TG/211GA, −53(6/7)/−3279GG/211GG, −53(7/7)/−3279GG/211GG | Other 23 estimated‐genotypes |
| 686CC/−53(7/7) | −3279 and 211 | 9 | −3279GG/211GG | Other eight estimated‐genotypes |
| 686CC/−53(6/7) | −3279 and 211 | 9 | −3279TG/211GG, −3279TG/211GA, −3279GG/211GG | Other six estimated‐genotypes |
| 686CC/−53(6/6) | −3279 and 211 | 9 | −3279TT/211GG, −3279TT/211GA, −3279TT/211AA, −3279TG/211GG, −3279TG/211GA, −3279GG/211GG | −3279TG/211AA, −3279GG/211AA, −3279GG/211GA |
Abbreviations: SNV, single‐nucleotide variant; UGT, UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase; 6/6, A(TA)6TAA/A(TA)6TAA; 6/7, A(TA)6TAA/A(TA)7TAA; 7/7, A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA.
Figure 2 presents the distribution of the 15 observed genotypes. The results revealed that the wild type of nucleotide −3279 could predict the presence of the wild‐type gene at nucleotide −53 is, and the wild type of nucleotide −53 could predict the presence of the wild‐type gene at nucleotide 686. By contrast, the wild type of nucleotide 686 (CC) could not predict whether nucleotide −53 is wild type [A(TA)6TAA/A(TA)6TAA], and the wild type of nucleotide −53 could not predict whether nucleotide −3279 is wild type (TT). Furthermore, the homozygote of −3279 (GG) predicted that nucleotide 211 is wild type (GG). Therefore, to determine the four SNVs, the SNV of −3279 should be first identified, followed by the SNVs of −53, 686, and 211.
4. VARIATION STATUS OF UGT1A1 AND DISEASES
4.1. Crigler–Najjar syndromes
The UGT1A1 enzyme activity was 0% and approximately 10% of normal in patients with CN‐1 and CN‐2, respectively. 1 The corresponding serum bilirubin levels ranged from 342 to 855 μmol/L in patients with CN‐1 and from 103 to 342 μmol/L in those with CN‐2. 1 In CN‐1, common mutations are deletions, alterations in intron splice donor and receptor sites, missense mutations, exon skipping, insertion, and stop codon formation within UGT1A1. By contrast, CN‐2 results from a point mutation in UGT1A1. 2 , 5 , 33 , 46 , 70 In Caucasian patients with CN‐2, point mutations were widely distributed and often combined with −53A(TA)6TAA/A(TA)7TAA or −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA, whereas compound homozygous variations in the coding region were frequently observed in Asian patients with CN‐2. 70 Among 27 East Asian patients with CN‐2, 14 (51.8%) were carriers of 1456GG/211AA. 70 For the carriers of 1456GG/211AA, UGT1A1 activity was approximately 6% of normal. 71 The findings indicate that 1456GG/211AA causes CN‐2. Moreover, 1456GG/211GA, 1091TT/211GA, and 1091TT/−3279GG were observed in Asian patients with CN‐2. 31 , 70 The 1456G and 1091T have never been reported in patients of other ethnicities expect East Asian patients, whereas 1091C>T was observed in South East Asian Malaysians (Table 2). The results indicate that for the development of CN‐2, the variation status of UGT1A1 differs between Asians and Caucasians and between East Asians and other Asian ethnic groups.
4.2. Glibert's syndrome
In patients with GS, the UGT1A1 enzyme activity ranges from 11% to approximately 30% of normal, and the serum bilirubin level ranges from 17 to 103 μmol/L. 1 Although 9%–18% of healthy Caucasians harbored the −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA genotype, this genotype is the main genetic cause of GS in Caucasians. 1 , 2 However, we observed that both −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA and 211AA are the main genetic causes of GS in Asians, except in the Indian, 19 , 39 Malaysian, 16 and Saudi 21 populations because the 211G>A variation did not affect unconjugated bilirubin levels in these three ethnic groups. Our finding is in agreement with previously reported data. 72 In addition, we observed that individuals carrying −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA or 211AA had a high risk of GS because only 0%–2.8% of healthy Asians harbored these two variants. UGT1A1 activity in patients carrying 686AA was 14.0% of normal. 1 The finding indicates that 686AA causes GS. For the development of GS, the variation status of UGT1A1 differs between Asians and Caucasians.
Recently, a study conducted in Taiwan determined the six SNVs of UGT1A1 and reported that an UGT1A1 activity of ≤40% of normal is a risk factor for GS. 1 The authors concluded that evaluating UGT1A1 activity rather than analyzing the SNVs and genotypes of UGT1A1 should provide more information regarding the mechanisms underlying the development of GS. 1
In Asian populations, the variants of UGT1A1 combined with OATP2, 7 , 39 , 58 glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), 56 , 58 heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1‐1), 39 and biliverdin reductase A (BLVRA) 39 exert additive effects on adult patients with mild unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. However, mildly elevated unconjugated bilirubin in GS is strongly associated with a decreased prevalence of chronic diseases, particularly cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as cardiovascular disease‐related and all‐cause mortality. 72
4.3. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia
The main genetic cause of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA in Caucasians, 73 whereas 211AA, but not −53A(TA)7TAA/A(TA)7TAA, is the main genetic cause in Asians. 73 , 74 The results of our review confirmed these findings (except for Indonesian, 14 , 40 Malaysian, 52 and Saudi 21 populations). Moreover, the TA7 repeat variant of UGT1A1 appears to exert a protective effect on hyperbilirubinemia development in Chinese, 28 Japanese, 48 , 75 and Taiwanese 57 , 67 neonates fed breast milk. Breast milk suppresses UGT1A1 expression in the small intestine, and this undefined environmental pressure induces the (TA)n repeat to maintain serum bilirubin levels. The (TA)n repeat might be a balanced variation evolutionarily selected to maintain serum bilirubin in an optimal range under undefined genetic and environmental pressure. 67 , 76 The results of a study conducted in Taiwan demonstrated that the estimated enzyme activity, depending on the combination of UGT1A1 genotypes cannot be used to explain the development of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia because the expression of UGT1A1 in neonates remains unclear. 67
In Asians, G6PD deficiency, 54 , 61 , 65 variations in OATP2, 26 , 57 , 76 variations in HMOX1‐1, 65 , 76 variations in BLVRA, 76 and ABO incompatibility hemolysis disease 35 are additive risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in newborns carrying homozygous 211G to A variation in UGT1A1.
4.4. Further concern for variations on common exons
Four exons (exons 2–5) are common in the nine functional UGT1A alternatively spliced products transcribed from the UGT1A gene locus, namely UGT1A1 and UGT1A3–UGT1A10. 9 A common exon variation in UGT1A1 affects the activities of all functional UGT1As. Among the six SNVs analyzed in this study, the 1091C>T (p.Pro364Leu) and 1456T>G (p.Tyr486Asp) are crucial because they are located on exons 4 and 5, respectively. These two variations are located close to the UDP‐glucuronic acid binding site and lead to considerable reduction in the activity of many UGT1A isoforms, thus resulting in the adverse effects of various drugs. 77 Table 4 presents the glucuronidation activity of UGT1As for 1091TT and 1456GG toward certain drugs. For example, glucuronidation activity toward the acetaminophen of p.Phe364Leu–UGT1A1A9 was 5.0% of the wild type and glucuronidation activity toward the 2‐amino‐5‐nitro‐4‐trifluoromethylphenol (a major metabolite of flutamide) of p.Tyr486Asp‐UGT1A6 was <1% of the wild type. 77 , 78 Therefore, the gene analysis of variations on common exons in patients who experience adverse effects of drugs can help determine the significance of the variations. 77 , 79
TABLE 4.
Glucuronidation activity of UGT1As (V max value, % of the corresponding wild‐type) for the SNVs (1091TT and 1456GG) toward certain drugs
| UGT1 | A1 | A3 | A6 | A7 | A8 | A9 | A10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1091TT 77 | |||||||
| β‐estradiol | 36.3 | 82.1 | — a | 26.8 | 29.2 | — | 22.5 |
| Acetaminophen | 50.3 | — | 46.4 | 17.2 | 44.1 | 5.0 | 42.8 |
| Propofol | — | — | — | 44.0 | 49.8 | 29.0 | 71.1 |
| 1456GG 78 | |||||||
| Propofol | — | — | — | — | — | 28.8 | — |
| Mycophenolic acid | — | — | — | — | — | 33.6 | — |
| 1‐Naphthol | — | — | — | — | — | 126.1 | — |
| Naringenin | — | — | — | — | — | 77.9 | — |
| 2‐Amino‐5‐nitro‐4‐trifluoro‐methylphenol | 12.0 | — | <1.0 | — | — | — | — |
Abbreviations: SNV, single‐nucleotide variant; UGT, UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase.
Data not available.
5. THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE: INVOLVEMENT OF UGT1A1 IN GILBERT'S SYNDROME, CRIGLER–NAJJAR SYNDROMES, AND IRINOTECAN PHARMACOGENETICS AS EXAMPLES
5.1. Glibert's syndrome
Because the UGT1A1 enzyme activity is approximately 30% of normal and considerably elevated bilirubin levels are not observed, patients with GS require no treatment. 80 However, patients with GS and other types of diseases should receive personalized treatment and care. 80 In order to maintain health‐related quality of life, some scholars suggest to screen, counsel, monitor, and healthcare for GS subjects in anesthesia, direct antiviral therapy treatment, pregnancy, childbirth, surgery, and weight loss programs. 80
5.2. Crigler–Najjar syndromes
Two main categories of treatments are available for patients with CN: controlling bilirubin and its neurotoxic effects through phototherapy, plasmapheresis, and pharmacological treatment and restoring UGT1A1 activity in hepatocytes through cell and gene therapy. 81 Intensive phototherapy is a common treatment for CN‐1. 81 Plasmapheresis is the most effective process for the removal of excess unconjugated bilirubin in patients with severe hyperbilirubinemia. 81 In patients with CN‐2, pharmacological treatment includes the use of enzyme‐inducing agent (phenobarbital), bilirubin‐binding agents (calcium phosphate and orlistat), choleretics (ursodeoxycholic acid), and heme‐oxygenase inhibitor. 81
Although liver transplantation is the only therapeutic and definitive treatment for CN‐1, the transplantation of allogeneic hepatocytes or hepatocyte progenitor cells and gene therapy (e.g., recombinant adeno‐associated virus vectors) can cure such inherited liver disorders. 81
5.3. Irinotecan pharmacogenetics
Irinotecan is one of the most widely used anticancer agents. Many studies have reported the relationship between the glucuronidation of irinotecan and the variants of UGT1A1 in Asians. For example, at least 18 studies on this topic have been published from 2018 to 2021 when irinotecan‐based chemotherapy was prescribed for Asian patients with colon cancer. 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99
Patients with homozygous or heterozygous UGT1A1 variants exhibited a lower glucuronidation ability for metabolizing irinotecan and then developing ADRs than did patients without UGT1A1 variants. 2 , 93 The majority of those 18 studies have reported that both 211G>A and −53A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA were significantly associated with both irinotecan‐induced toxicity and poor therapeutic efficacy (e.g., decreased progression‐free survival). A study indicated that reducing the initial dose of irinotecan by approximately 20% might be safe without reducing the therapeutic effect in Japanese patients with colon cancer with homozygous UGT1A1 variants. 92 The results indicate that pretherapeutic testing for the UGT1A1 genotype in patients with cancer can improve patient safety and is a practical and cost‐effective strategy, and such testing should become the standard of care.
We examined whether the 18 studies reflected the actual variation status of participants because most of the studies focused only on 211A and −53A(TA)7TAA. We investigated the effects of both UGT1A1 211GA and −3279GG on the ADRs of cancer chemotherapy. In a review of Asian patients with colon cancer treated with irinotecan, ADRs, including severe ADRs, tended to be higher in patients with the 211GA genotype than in those with the wild‐type genotype. 87
The UGT1A1 activity for −3279GG was determined to be 60.0% of normal 44 and the same as that for 211GA (60.2% of normal 71 ) We speculated that patients with cancer who harbor the UGT1A1–3279GG genotype would develop ADRs, as would patients harboring the 211GA genotype. The SNPs −3279GG and 211G>A are two independent variants because of the expulsion phenomenon. A study reported that UGT1A1–3279GG and UGT1A1 211G>A genetic variants are independent factors affecting the occurrence of grade 3–4 delayed diarrhea in Chinese patients with cancer receiving treatment with irinotecan (50.4% of them had colon cancer). 99 The findings indicated that UGT1A1–3279GG should not be neglected in pharmacogenetic studies.
6. CONCLUSION
Variants of UGT1A1 not only play a critical role in the development of CN, GS, and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia but are also involved in the development of ADRs and in the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy. The SNV −53A(TA)6TAA>A(TA)7TAA in UGT1A1, which was first reported by Dutch scholars in 1995, 1 has been observed in Asian populations since 1996. 41 In addition, the SNVs 686C>A, 211G>A, 1456T>G, and −3279T>G were first identified by Japanese investigators in 1995, 1 1998, 71 and 2002, 44 whereas 1091C>T was first determined by Taiwanese researchers in 2000. 13 The variation status of UGT1A1 in Asians is more complicated than that in non‐Asians. Therefore, examining UGT1A1 in Asian populations is challenging. Comprehensive approaches should be adopted in future studies examining the involvement of UGT1A1 in pharmacogenetics for Asian populations.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank M.D. Pi‐Feng Chang for her excellent suggestion in writing this manuscript.
Huang M‐J, Chen P‐L, Huang C‐S. Bilirubin metabolism and UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 variants in Asians: Pathogenic implications and therapeutic response. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2022;38(8):729–738. 10.1002/kjm2.12579
REFERENCES
- 1. Huang MJ, Chen YC, Huang YY, Yang SS, Chen PL, Huang CS. Effect of UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 activity on risk for developing Gilbert's syndrome. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019;35(7):432–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Steventon G. Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1. Xenobiotica. 2020;50(1):64–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Huang YY, Huang MJ, Yang SS, Teng HC, Huang CS. Variations in the UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene for the development of unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in Taiwanese. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9(9):1229–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Maruo Y, Nakahara S, Yanagi T, Nomura A, Mimura Y, Matsui K, et al. Genotype of UGT1A1 and phenotype correlation between Crigler‐Najjar syndrome type II and Gilbert syndrome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(2):403–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sun L, Li M, Zhang L, Teng X, Chen X, Zhou X, et al. Differences in UGT1A1 gene mutations and pathological liver changes between Chinese patients with Gilbert syndrome and Crigler‐Najjar syndrome type II. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(45):e8620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zhang A, Xing Q, Qin S, Du J, Wang L, Yu L, et al. Intra‐ethnic differences in genetic variants of the UGT‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene in Chinese populations. Pharmacogenomics J. 2007;7(5):333–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bai J, Luo L, Liu S, Liang C, Bai L, Chen Y, et al. Combined effects of UGT1A1 and SLCO1B1 variants on Chinese adult mild unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. Front Genet. 2019;10:1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhang M, Wang H, Huang Y, Xu X, Liu W, Ning Q, et al. Compound heterozygous UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 or single homozygous UGT1A1*28 are major genotypes associated with Gilbert's syndrome in Chinese Han people. Gene. 2021;781:145526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yan W, Wang YW, Yang FF, Wang M, Zhang XQ, Dong J, et al. Differences in frequencies of UGT1A9, 1A7, and 1A1 genetic polymorphisms in Chinese Tibetan versus Han Chinese populations. Genet Mol Res. 2013;12(4):6454–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Saeki M, Saito Y, Jinno H, Sai K, Ozawa S, Kurose K, et al. Haplotype structures of the UGT1A gene complex in a Japanese population. Pharmacogenomics J. 2006;6(1):63–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ki CS, Lee KA, Lee SY, Kim HJ, Cho SS, Park JH, et al. Haplotype structure of the UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene and its relationship to serum total bilirubin concentration in a male Korean population. Clin Chem. 2003;49(12):2078–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kim JJ, Oh J, Kim Y, Lee KA. Genetic spectrum of UGT1A1 in Korean patients with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. Ann Lab Med. 2020;40(3):281–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Huang CS, Luo GA, Huang ML, Yu SC, Yang SS. Variations of the bilirubin uridine‐diphosphoglucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene in healthy Taiwanese. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10(6):539–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wisnumurti DA, Sribudiani Y, Porsch RM, Maskoen AM, Abdulhamied LI, Rahayuningsih SE, et al. UGT1A1 genetic variations and a haplotype associated with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in Indonesian population. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:9425843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Teh LK, Hashim H, Zakaria ZA, Salleh MZ. Polymorphisms of UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*27 & UGT1A1*28 in three major ethnic groups from Malaysia. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136(2):249–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sivadas A, Salleh MZ, Teh LK, Scaria V. Genetic epidemiology of pharmacogenetic variants in south east Asian Malays using whole‐genome sequences. Pharmacogenomics J. 2017;17(5):461–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Mauleekoonphairoj J, Chamnanphon M, Khongphatthanayothin A, Sutjaporn B, Wandee P, Poovorawan Y, et al. Phenotype prediction and characterization of 25 pharmacogenes in Thais from whole genome sequencing for clinical implementation. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Nguyen TT, Zhao W, Yang X, Zhong DN. The relationship between hyperbilirubinemia and the promoter region and first exon of UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms in Vietnamese newborns. Pediatr Res. 2020;88(6):940–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. D'Silva S, Colah RB, Ghosh K, Mukherjee MB. UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene haplotypes and their effect on serum bilirubin concentration in healthy Indian adults. Gene. 2013;513(1):36–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Maeda H, Hazama S, Shavkat A, Okamoto K, Oba K, Sakamoto J, et al. Differences in UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 polymorphisms between Uzbek and Japanese populations. Mol Diagn Ther. 2014;18(3):333–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Alkharfy KM, Alghamdi AM, Bagulb KM, Al‐Jenoobi FI, Al‐Mohizea AM, Al‐Muhsen S, et al. Distribution of selected gene polymorphisms of UGT1A1 in a Saudi population. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9(4):731–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhang X, Meng X, Wang Y, Yan W, Yang J. Comprehensive analysis of UGT1A1 genetic polymorphisms in Chinese Tibetan and Han populations. Biochem Genet. 2012;50(11‐12):967–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sun SC, Zhou ZM, Chen QR, Peng YS, Tu CQ. Mutation analysis of UGT1A1 gene in patients with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. ZhonghuaYi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2013;30(4):425–8. [Article in Chinese]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Chen Z, Su D, Ai L, Jiang X, Wu C, Xu Q, et al. UGT1A1 sequence variants associated with risk of adult hyperbilirubinemia: a quantitative analysis. Gene. 2014;552(1):32–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Wu XJ, Zhong DN, Xie XZ, Ye DZ, Gao ZY. UGT1A1 gene mutations and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in Guangxi Heiyi Zhuang and Han populations. Pediatr Res. 2015;78(5):585–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Yang H, Wang Q, Zheng L, Lin M, Zheng XB, Lin F, et al. Multiple genetic modifiers of bilirubin metabolism involvement in significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in patients of Chinese descent. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sun L, Zhang L, Li M, Teng XY, Qi LM, Zhou XG, et al. The analysis of UGT1A1 gene mutations in hereditary unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2016;24(11):863–6. [Article in Chinese]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Yang H, Wang Q, Zheng L, Zheng XB, Lin M, Zhan XF, et al. Clinical significance of UGT1A1 genetic analysis in Chinese neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Neonatol. 2016;57(4):310–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Guo XH, Sun YF, Cui M, Wang JB, Han SZ, Miao J. Analysis of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene mutations in neonates with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15(2):15028373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Abuduxikuer K, Fang LJ, Li LT, Gong JY, Wang JS. UGT1A1 genotypes and unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia phenotypes in post‐neonatal Chinese children: a retrospective analysis and quantitative correlation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(49):e13576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Xiong QF, Zhong YD, Feng XN, Zhou H, Liu DX, Wu XP, et al. Study on spectrum of UGT1A1 mutations in connection with inherited non‐hemolytic unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2018;26(12):898–902. [Article in Chinese]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Mi XX, Yan J, Ma XJ, Zhu GL, Gao YD, Yang WJ, et al. Analysis of the UGT1A1 genotype in hyperbilirubinemia patients: differences in allele frequency and distribution. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:6272174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Liang C, Luo L, Bai J, Bai L, Bian DD, Ren Y, et al. Analysis of mutation site characteristics of Gilbert syndrome and Crigler‐‐Najjar syndrome in relation to uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase A1 gene. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2020;28(5):428–33. [Article in Chinese]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zhang M, Li WN, Chen G, Xu X, Qi JY. Analysis of diagnostic value of UGT1A1 gene detection in Gilbert syndrome. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2021;29(2):143–9. [Article in Chinese]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Yang H, Lin F, Chen ZK, Zhang L, Xu JX, Wu YH, et al. UGT1A1 mutation association with increased bilirubin levels and severity of unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in ABO incompatible newborns of China. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mei H, Dong X, Wu B, Wang H, Lu Y, Hu L, et al. Clinical and genetic etiologies of neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in the China neonatal genomes project. J Pediatr. 2022;243:53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Farheen S, Sengupta S, Santra A, Pal S, Dhali GK, Chakravorty M, et al. Gilbert's syndrome: high frequency of the (TA)7 TAA allele in India and its interaction with a novel CAT insertion in promoter of the gene for bilirubin UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1 gene. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(14):2269–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tiwari PK, Bhutada A, Agarwal R, Basu S, Raman R, Kumar A. UGT1A1 gene variants and clinical risk factors modulate hyperbilirubinemia risk in newborns. J Perinatol. 2014;34(2):120–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Chiddarwar AS, D'Silva SZ, Colah RB, Ghosh K, Mukherjee MB. Genetic variations in bilirubin metabolism genes and their association with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in adults. Ann Hum Genet. 2017;81(1):11–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Amandito R, Rohsiswatmo R, Carolina E, Maulida R, Kresnawati W, Malik A. Profiling of UGT1A1(*)6, UGT1A1(*)60, UGT1A1(*)93, and UGT1A1(*)28 polymorphisms in Indonesian neonates with hyperbilirubinemia using multiplex PCR sequencing. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sato H, Adachi Y, Koiwai O. The genetic basis of Gilbert's syndrome. Lancet. 1996;347(9001):557–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Maruo Y, Nishizawa K, Sato H, Sawa H, Shimada M. Prolonged unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia associated with breast milk and mutations of the bilirubin uridine diphosphate‐ glucuronosyltransferase gene. Pediatrics. 2000;106(5):E59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ishihara T, Kaito M, Takeuchi K, Gabazza EC, Tanaka Y, Higuchi K, et al. Role of UGT1A1 mutation in fasting hyperbilirubinemia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16(6):678–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Sugatani J, Yamakawa K, Yoshinari K, Machida T, Takagi H, Mori M, et al. Identification of a defect in the UGT1A1 gene promoter and its association with hyperbilirubinemia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;292(2):492–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Saeki M, Saito Y, Jinno H, Tohkin M, Kurose K, Kaniwa N, et al. Comprehensive UGT1A1 genotyping in a Japanese population by pyrosequencing. Clin Chem. 2003;49(7):1182–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Takeuchi K, Kobayashi Y, Tamaki S, Ishihara T, Maruo Y, Araki J, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of bilirubin uridine diphosphate‐glucuronosyltransferase gene in Japanese patients with Crigler‐Najjar syndrome or Gilbert's syndrome as well as in healthy Japanese subjects. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19(9):1023–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Saeki M, Saito Y, Sai K, Maekawa K, Kaniwa N, Sawada J, et al. A combinatorial haplotype of the UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene (#60‐#IB) increases total bilirubin concentrations in Japanese volunteers. Clin Chem. 2007;53(2):356–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Maruo Y, Morioka Y, Fujito H, Nakahara S, Yanagi T, Matsui K, et al. Bilirubin uridine diphosphate‐glucuronosyltransferase variation is a genetic basis of breast milk jaundice. J Pediatr. 2014;165(1):36–41.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Horinouchi T, Maeyama K, Nagai M, Mizobuchi M, Takagi Y, Okada Y, et al. Genetic analysis of UGT1A1 polymorphisms using preserved dried umbilical cord for assessing the potential of neonatal jaundice as a risk factor for autism spectrum disorder in children. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022;52(2):483–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Yea SS, Lee SS, Kim WY, Liu KH, Kim H, Shon JH, et al. Genetic variations and haplotypes of UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A locus in a Korean population. Ther Drug Monit. 2008;30(1):23–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kim JY, Cheong HS, Park BL, Kim LH, Namgoong S, Kim JO, et al. Comprehensive variant screening of the UGT gene family. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(1):232–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Boo NY, Sin S, Chee SC, Mohamed M, Ahluwalia AK, Ling MMM, et al. Genetic factors and delayed TSB monitoring and treatment as risk factors associated with severe hyperbilirubinemia in term neonates admitted for phototherapy. J Trop Pediatr. 2020;66(6):569–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Hsieh SY, Wu YH, Lin DY, Chu CM, Wu M, Liaw YF. Correlation of mutational analysis to clinical features in Taiwanese patients with Gilbert's syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(4):1188–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Huang CS, Chang PF, Huang MJ, Chen ES, Chen WC. Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, the UDP‐glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene, and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(1):127–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Huang CS, Chang PF, Huang MJ, Chen ES, Hung KL, Tsou KI. Relationship between bilirubin UDP‐glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Res. 2002;52(4):601–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Huang MJ, Yang YC, Yang SS, Lin MS, Chen ES, Huang CS. Coinheritance of variant UDP‐glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene and glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in adults with hyperbilirubinemia. Pharmacogenetics. 2002;12(8):663–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Huang MJ, Kua KE, Teng HC, Tang KS, Weng HW, Huang CS. Risk factors for severe hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. Pediatr Res. 2004;56(5):682–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Huang CS, Huang MJ, Lin MS, Yang SS, Teng HC, Tang KS. Genetic factors related to unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia amongst adults. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005;15(1):43–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Teng HC, Huang MJ, Tang KS, Yang SS, Tseng CS, Huang CS. Combined UGT1A1 and UGT1A7 variant alleles are associated with increased risk of Gilbert's syndrome in Taiwanese adults. Clin Genet. 2007;72(4):321–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Chang PF, Lin YC, Liu K, Yeh SJ, Ni YH. Prolonged unconjugated hyperbiliriubinemia in breast‐fed male infants with a mutation of uridine diphosphate‐glucuronosyl transferase. J Pediatr. 2009;155(6):860–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Chang PF, Lin YC, Liu K, Yeh SJ, Ni YH. Risk of hyperbilirubinemia in breast‐fed infants. J Pediatr. 2011;159(4):561–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Chang PF, Lin YC, Liu K, Yeh SJ, Ni YH. Identifying term breast‐fed infants at risk of significant hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Res. 2013;74(4):408–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Hu RT, Wang NY, Huang MJ, Huang CS, Chen DS, Yang SS. Multiple variants in UGT1A1 gene are factors to develop indirect hyperbilirubinemia. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014;3(4):194–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Tsai SY, Er TK, Lin CW, Chang JG. Comprehensive analysis of UGT1A1 polymorphisms through high‐resolution melting analysis and DNA sequencing. Clin Lab. 2014;60(6):1015–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Weng YH, Chiu YW, Cheng SW, Yang CY. Risk assessment of gene variants for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in Taiwan. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16(1):144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Teng HC, Chen YC, Yang SS, Huang MJ, Huang CS. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotypes among polymorphisms of the UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene. Wulfenia J. 2018;25(3):180–98. [Google Scholar]
- 67. Huang MJ, Lin YC, Liu K, Chang PF, Huang CS. Effects of variation status and enzyme activity for UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene on neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Neonatol. 2020;61(5):506–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Innocenti F, Grimsley C, Das S, Ramírez J, Cheng C, Kuttab‐Boulos H, et al. Haplotype structure of the UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 promoter in different ethnic groups. Pharmacogenetics. 2002;12(9):725–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Mazur‐Kominek K, Romanowski T, Bielawski K, Kiełbratowska B, Preis K, Domżalska‐Popadiuket I, et al. Association between uridin diphosphate glucuronosylotransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene polymorphism and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Acta Biochim Pol. 2017;64(2):351–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Li L, Deng G, Tang Y, Mao Q. Spectrum of UGT1A1 variations in Chinese patients with Crigler‐Najjar syndrome type II. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Yamamoto K, Sato H, Fujiyama Y, Doida Y, Bamba T. Contribution of two missense mutations (G71R and Y486D) of the bilirubin UDP glycosyltransferase (UGT1A1) gene to phenotypes of Gilbert's syndrome and Crigler‐Najjar syndrome type II. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1406(3):267–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Wagner KH, Shiels RG, Lang CA, Seyed Khoei N, Bulmer AC. Diagnostic criteria and contributors to Gilbert's syndrome. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55(2):129–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Wang J, Yin J, Xue M, Lyu J, Wan Y. Roles of UGT1A1 Gly71Arg and TATA promoter polymorphisms in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a meta‐analysis. Gene. 2020;736:144409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Mehrad‐Majd H, Haerian MS, Akhtari J, Ravanshad Y, Azarfar A, Mamouri G. Effects of Gly71Arg mutation in UGT1A1 gene on neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(10):1575–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Sato H, Uchida T, Toyota K, Kanno M, Hashimoto T, Watanabe M, et al. Association of breast‐fed neonatal hyperbilirubinemia with UGT1A1 polymorphisms: 211G>A (G71R) mutation becomes a risk factor under inadequate feeding. J Hum Genet. 2013;58(1):7–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. He CH, Qu Y. Research advances in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and gene polymorphisms. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020;22(3):280–4. [Article in Chinese]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Mimura Y, Maruo Y, Ohta Y, Sato H, Takeuchi Y. Effect of common exon variant (p.P364L) on drug glucuronidation by the human UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1 family. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011;109(6):486–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Takahashi H, Maruo Y, Mori A, Iwai M, Sato H, Takeuchi Y. Effect of D256N and Y483D on propofol glucuronidation by human uridine 5′‐diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A9). Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;103:131–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Chen ES, Lee CL, Tsui KC, Huang CS. Diclofenac‐induced adverse drug reactions and hyperbilirubinemia caused by a variant gene. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2022;38(3):286–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Liu D, Yu Q, Ning Q, Liu Z, Song J. The relationship between UGT1A1 gene & various diseases and prevention strategies. Drug Metab Rev. 2022;54(1):1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Tcaciuc E, Podurean M, Tcaciuc A. Management of Crigler‐Najjar syndrome. Med Pharm Rep. 2021;94:S64–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Yu Q, Zhang T, Xie C, Qiu H, Liu B, Huang L, et al. UGT1A polymorphisms associated with worse outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan‐based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;82(1):87–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Ma CJ, Huang CW, Chang TK, Tsai HL, Su WC, Yeh YS, et al. Oncologic outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer with regorafenib with FOLFIRI as a third‐or fourth‐line setting. Transl Oncol. 2019;12(3):502–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Wang J, Fan J, Li C, Yang L, Wan J, Zhang H, et al. The impact of chemotherapy completion on the efficacy of irinotecan in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer: an expanded analysis of the CinClare phase III trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020;19(2):e58–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Hsieh YC, Chang TK, Su WC, Huang CW, Tsai HL, Chen YC, et al. UGT1A1 polymorphism for irinotecan dose escalation in patients with BRAF‐mutated metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first‐line bevacizumab and FOLFIRI. J Oncol. 2021;2021:6686517–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Li XK, Wang WL, Xu YX, Yang Y, Wang G, Dong HM, et al. The correlation between UGT1A1 gene phenotypes and the clinical prognosis of advanced colorectal cancer after FOLFIRI therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2021;36(9):720–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Zhu X, Ma R, Ma X, Yang G. Association of UGT1A1*6 polymorphism with irinotecan‐based chemotherapy reaction in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and a meta‐analysis. Biosci Rep. 2020;40(10):BSR20200576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kimura K, Yamano T, Igeta M, Imada A, Jihyung S, Babaya A, et al. UGT1A1 polymorphisms in rectal cancer associated with the efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemoradiotherapy using irinotecan. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(12):3934–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Tian C, Ying H, Zhuang R, Zhang X, Lu H, Wang H, et al. Value of plasma SN‐38 levels and DPD activity in irinotecan‐based individualized chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer with heterozygous type UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*28. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:6217–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Hamaguchi T, Tsuji A, Yamaguchi K, Takeda K, Uetake H, Esaki T, et al. A phase II study of NK012, a polymeric micelle formulation of SN‐38, in unresectable, metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;82(6):1021–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Oki E, Kato T, Bando H, Yoshino T, Muro K, Taniguchi H, et al. A multicenter clinical phase II study of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first‐line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: QUATTRO study. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17(2):147–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Fujii H, Yamada Y, Watanabe D, Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Yoshida K, et al. Dose adjustment of irinotecan based on UGT1A1 polymorphisms in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019;83(1):123–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Chen S, Hua L, Feng C, Mo Q, Wei M, Shen Y, et al. Correlation between UGT1A1 gene polymorphism and irinotecan chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a study from Guangxi Zhuang. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Atasilp C, Chansriwong P, Sirachainan E, Reungwetwattana T, Sirilerttrakul S, Chamnanphon M, et al. Effect of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters in Thai colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan‐based chemotherapy. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Shinozaki K, Yamada T, Nasu J, Matsumoto T, Yuasa Y, Shiraishi T, et al. A phase II study of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as initial chemotherapy for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: TRICC1414 (BeTRI). Int J Clin Oncol. 2021;26(2):399–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Basade M, Mane A. Optimum patient selection for irinotecan‐containing regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: literature review and lessons from clinical practice. Indian J Cancer. 2021;58(1):5–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Iwasa S, Muro K, Morita S, Park YS, Nakamura M, Kotaka M, et al. Impact of UGT1A1 genotype on the efficacy and safety of irinotecan‐based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2021;112(11):4669–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Wakao R, Lönnstedt IM, Aoki Y, Chandler RE. The use of subgroup disproportionality analyses to explore the sensitivity of a global database of individual case safety reports to known pharmacogenomic risk variants common in Japan. Drug Saf. 2021;44(6):681–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Wang XF, Ma C, Gong FF, Yi SY, Xing GC, Wang KJ, et al. Relationship between UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms and irinotecan‐induced severe adverse events. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018;40(8):594–9. [Article in Chinese]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
