Skip to main content
Journal of the Endocrine Society logoLink to Journal of the Endocrine Society
. 2025 Feb 24;9(4):bvaf026. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaf026

Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency (AGHD) and Outcomes (NordiNet and ANSWER)

John D Carmichael 1,, Atil Y Kargi 2, Laura Dichtel 3, Nicky Kelepouris 4, Navid Nedjatian 5, Moshe Fridman 6, Matthias M Weber 7
PMCID: PMC11897700  PMID: 40078421

Abstract

Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is a rare disease with both physiological and psychological effects for untreated patients. AGHD symptoms can improve over time with GH treatment. Here we have analyzed the long-term effectiveness and safety of short-acting GH replacement therapy (GHRT) in treatment naïve and nonnaïve patients with AGHD using real-world data from the NordiNet® International Outcome Study and American Norditropin® Studies: Web Enabled Research Program. Outcomes were compared between 3 age groups, comprised of patients aged 18 to 29 years, 30 to 39 years, and 40 to 59 years. The safety outcome was the incidence of nonserious and serious adverse reactions and serious adverse events by age group. Efficacy outcomes included mean GH exposure by age group alone, by sex and age group, or based on estrogen usage in female patients; IGF-I SD score (SDS) levels by sex and age group; mean glycated hemoglobin by sex and age group; and mean non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by sex and age group. The incidence rates of adverse events and reactions did not statistically differ between the 3 groups. Mean IGF-I SDS levels reached a normal range (−2 to 2) in ≥80% of patients from all groups in the effectiveness analysis set by year 2. Together with previous reports of older patients, these results support the real-world safety and efficacy of short-acting GHRT among all ages of patients with AGHD.

Keywords: adult GH deficiency, GH replacement therapy, registry data, age groups


Adult GH deficiency (AGHD) is a rare disease characterized by body composition changes in reduced muscle mass, osteoporosis, and increased body fat [1], as well as cognitive impairment and altered mood [2-4]. AGHD is additionally associated with the impairment of various quality of life measures, including emotional lability, social isolation, and energy levels [5]. The incidence rate of AGHD is estimated to be 6000 new cases per year, with more than 50 000 diagnosed adults in the United States [6].

Importantly, previous studies have suggested that GH treatment is effective in mitigating these health impacts [7, 8]. Furthermore, withdrawal of treatment can lead to increased negative effects [9, 10]. The benefits of GH replacement therapy (GHRT) may include improvements in cardiovascular risk markers, cardiac function, bone mineral density, and overall enhanced quality of life. However, common adverse effects associated with GHRT include peripheral edema, arthralgias, carpal tunnel syndrome, and paresthesia. There are data to suggest that the risk for such adverse effects increases with age and dosage [11].

The large-scale, noninterventional NordiNet® International Outcome Study (IOS) and American Norditropin® Studies: Web Enabled Research (ANSWER) Program collected real-world data on the long-term effectiveness and safety of short-acting GHRT [12]. The objective of the current study was to compare the safety and clinical outcomes of short-acting GHRT in adults with AGHD across 3 age groups, including the incidence of nonserious (NSARs) and serious adverse reactions (SARs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) by age group, and mean GH exposure, IGF-I SD score (SDS) level, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level by age group and sex.

Methods

The methods used in this study were adapted from those of a prior study with several key differences [13]. The analyzed population includes patients with AGHD aged 18 to 59 years, while the prior study included patients aged ≥60 years. Additionally, the effectiveness analysis set (EAS) included naïve patients from both the ANSWER and NordiNet IOS programs, while the prior study included only patients from NordiNet IOS.

Real-world data from NordiNet IOS and ANSWER were used to analyze short-acting GHRT safety and clinical outcomes in adults with AGHD. Patients were divided into 3 age groups, including group 1, with patients aged 18 to 29 years; group 2, with patients aged 30 to 39 years; and group 3, with patients aged 40 to 59 years. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of NSARs, SARs, and SAEs by age group. The primary efficacy outcome was mean GH exposure by age group. Secondary efficacy outcomes were assessed by sex and age group and included GH exposure or based on estrogen usage in female patients, IGF-I SDS levels, mean HbA1c, and mean non-HDL cholesterol.

Safety was assessed in the full analysis set (FAS), including all GH-naïve and -nonnaïve patients with a GH deficiency diagnosis who initiated GH replacement after the age of 18 years and continued beyond the age of 20 years. Adverse events (AEs) describe any undesired medical occurrence experienced by a participant during the time of the study and can be classified as serious or nonserious based on severity, as determined by both the investigator and the sponsor. Adverse reactions were defined as an AE or SAE with a suspected causal (possibly or probably) relationship to short-acting GHRT, as determined by either the investigator or the sponsor. SARs, NSARs, and SAEs are presented as incidence rates per 1000 patient years. NSARs, SARs, and AEs were analyzed descriptively.

Clinical outcomes were assessed in the EAS, including patients who were GH naïve at baseline with valid baseline body mass index, age, and GH dosing information. Clinical outcomes were assessed yearly for ≤10 years of follow-up, and clinical outcome differences between groups were compared at 2 years. This time period was selected because it was considered sufficient for changes to be observed, and, after 2 years, the number of patients steadily decreased.

Baseline characteristics were analyzed descriptively. Continuous variables were statistically compared using ANOVA F-tests for overall 3-group differences with pairwise comparisons using t-tests and the Scheffe familywise adjustment. Statistical comparisons of incidence rates were performed using Poisson regression. P-values <.05 were considered significant.

Results

Clinical and Baseline Characteristics

Pooled analyses from NordiNet IOS and ANSWER included 2469 patients from the FAS and 1006 patients from the EAS. Select baseline characteristics, including average follow-up times, are described in Table 1 for both the EAS and FAS. In the EAS, the largest age group was group 3 (n = 649), the second largest age group was group 2 (n = 209), and the smallest age group was group 1 (n = 148). Similarly, most patients in the FAS fell within the group 3 age group (n = 1417). Group 1 (n = 558) and group 2 (n = 494) of the FAS were similar in size. Most patients in both analysis sets had a diagnosis of multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies. Consistent with the known impact of age on IGF-I levels in adults, baseline IGF-I levels decreased with increasing age [14].

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of adult patients in the EAS and FAS from NordiNet IOS and the ANSWER Program stratified by age group

EASa
  Group 1
Aged 18-29 y
Group 2
Aged 30-39 y
Group 3
Aged 40-59 y
Total
  Female
n = 68
Male
n = 80
Total
n = 148
Female
n = 125
Male
n = 84
Total
n = 209
Female
n = 337
Male
n = 312
Total
n = 649
Total
n = 1006
Sex, n (%)
 Female 68 (45.9) 125 (59.8) 337 (51.9) 530 (52.7)
 Male 80 (54.1) 84 (40.2) 312 (48.1) 476 (47.3)
IGHD, n (%) 47 (31.8) 85 (40.7) 281 (43.3) 413 (41.1)
MPHD, n (%) 101 (68.2) 124 (59.3) 368 (56.7) 593 (58.9)
Age at treatment start, y (SD)
 n 68 80 148 125 84 209 337 312 649 1006
 Mean (SD) 25.31 (3.02) 24.62 (2.99) 25 (3.0) 35.49 (2.79) 34.99 (2.93) 35 (2.9) 50.17 (5.60) 51.06 (5.37) 51 (5.5) 44 (11.0)
GH dose at baseline (mg/day)
 n 68 80 148 125 84 209 337 312 649 1006
 Mean (SD) 0.34 (0.21) 0.36 (0.33) 0.35 (0.28) 0.32 (0.21) 0.33 (0.24) 0.32 (0.22) 0.32 (0.24) 0.27 (0.24) 0.29 (0.24) 0.31 (0.24)
IGF-I SDS (Brabant)
 n 56 68 124 106 63 169 286 253 539 832
 Mean (SD) −2.03 (1.48) −1.66 (2.14) −1.83 (1.87) −0.85 (1.40) −1.17 (2.05) −0.97 (1.67) −0.56 (1.54) −0.84 (1.48) −0.69 (1.51) −0.92 (1.65)
BMI, kg/m2
 n 68 80 148 125 84 209 337 312 649 1006
 Mean (SD) 28.8 (9.7) 27.7 (6.5) 28.2 (8.1) 30.7 (8.2) 29.3 (7.0) 30.1 (7.7) 30.9 (8.6) 30.2 (5.9) 30.6 (7.4) 30.1 (7.6)
Waist circumference, cm
 n 30 38 68 52 41 93 129 144 273 434
 Mean (SD) 93.6 (23.0) 97.2 (15.7) 95.6 (19.2) 96.3(18.5) 101.1 (17.1) 98.4 (18.0) 96.4
(16.0)
103.5 (12.9) 100.2 (14.8) 99.1 (16.3)
HbA1c, %
 n 36 31 67 38 31 69 103 147 250 386
 Mean (SD) 5.3 (0.89) 5.0 (0.8) 5.2 (0.9) 5.2 (0.8) 5.3
(1.5)
5.2 (1.2) 5.3
(0.7)
5.4 (0.8) 5.4 (0.8) 5.3 (0.9)
Non-HDL cholesterol, mmol/L
 n 34 37 71 38 34 72 111 148 259 402
 Mean (SD) 4.08 (1.20) 3.95 (1.18) 4.01 (1.19) 4.06 (1.37) 4.11 (1.2) 4.09 (1.28) 4.38 (1.12) 4.63 (1.34) 4.52 (1.25) 4.35 (1.27)
Duration of follow-up, y
 n 67 79 146 123 82 205 334 307 641 992
 Mean (SD) 5.04 (4.40) 4.51 (3.73) 4.75 (4.04) 4.59 (3.87) 4.44 (4.24) 4.53 (4.01) 5.04 (4.05) 5.34 (4.14) 5.19 (4.09) 4.99 (4.07)
Etiology, n (%)
 Pituitary tumorsb 46 (31.2) 84 (40.3) 305 (47.0) 435 (43.3)
 Pituitary adenoma 40 (27.0) 67 (32.1) 267 (41.1) 374 (37.2)
 Prolactin-secreting tumor 2 (1.4) 8 (3.8) 20 (3.1) 30 (3.0)
 Acromegaly 1 (0.7) 1 (0.5) 10 (1.5) 12 (1.2)
 Cushing's syndrome 2 (1.4) 7 (3.4) 7 (1.1) 16 (1.6)
 TSH-secreting tumor 1 (0.7) 1 (0.2) 2 (0.2)
 Pituitary apoplexy 1 (0.5) 1 (0.1)
 Cranial tumorsb 38 (25.6) 32 (15.3) 64 (9.8) 134 (13.4)
 Postprocedural hypopituitarism 9 (6.1) 12 (5.7) 34 (5.2) 55 (5.5)
 Craniopharyngioma 15 (10.1) 12 (5.7) 23 (3.5) 50 (5.0)
 Irradiation 8 (5.4) 4 (1.9) 4 (0.6) 16 (1.6)
 Medulloblastoma
 Meningioma 2 (0.3) 2 (0.2)
 Astrocytoma 2 (1.3) 2 (1.0) 1 (0.2) 5 (0.5)
 Germinoma 3 (2.0) 2 (1.0) 5 (0.5)
 Glioma 1 (0.7) 1 (0.1)
Vascular 3 (2.0) 8 (3.8) 10 (1.6) 21 (2.1)
 Sheehan  syndrome 3 (2.0) 8 (3.8) 9 (1.4) 20 (2.0)
 Subarachnoid hemorrhage 1 (0.2) 1 (0.1)
Infiltrative/inflammatory disease 2 (1.4) 2 (0.3) 4 (0.4)
 Granulomatous 1 (0.7) 2 (0.3) 3 (0.3)
 Neurofibromatosis 1 (0.7) 1 (0.1)
 Langerhans cell histiocytosis
Isolated/idiopathic GHD 12 (8.1) 39 (18.7) 148 (22.8) 199 (19.8)
Congenital GHD 13 (8.8) 10 (4.8) 16 (2.5) 39 (3.9)
Acquired GHD (unspecified) 7 (4.7) 4 (1.9) 14 (2.2) 25 (2.5)
Traumatic brain injury 4 (2.7) 7 (3.4) 16 (2.5) 27 (2.7)
Empty sella syndrome 1 (0.7) 1 (0.2) 2 (0.2)
Hypothalamic dysfunctionc 1 (0.7) 1 (0.5) 9 (1.4) 11 (1.1)
Not reported or missing 21 (14.2) 24 (11.5) 64 (9.9) 109 (10.8)
FASd
  Group 1
Aged 18-29 y
Group 2
Aged 30-39 y
Group 3
Aged 40-59 y
Total
  Female
n = 246
Male
n = 312
Total
n = 558
Female
n = 272
Male
n = 222
Total
n = 494
Female
n = 729
Male
n = 688
Total
n = 1417
Total
n = 2469
Sex, n (%)
 Female 246 (44.1) 272 (55.1) 729 (51.4) 1247 (50.5)
 Male 312 (55.9) 222 (44.9) 688 (48.6) 1222 (49.5)
IGHD, n (%) 211 (37.8) 186 (37.7) 550 (38.8) 947 (38.4)
MPHD, n (%) 347 (62.2) 308 (62.3) 867 (61.2) 1522 (61.6)
Age at treatment start, y (SD)
 n 246 312 558 272 222 494 729 688 1417 2469
 Mean (SD) 23.56 (3.50) 23.17 (3.58) 23 (3.6) 35.49 (2.83) 35.11 (2.90) 35 (2.9) 50.36 (5.63) 50.83 (5.49) 51 (5.6) 41 (12.3)
GH dose at baseline (mg/day)
 n 234 297 531 257 211 468 695 646 1341 2340
 Mean (SD) 0.48 (0.45) 0.52 (0.53) 0.51 (0.49) 0.40
(0.31)
0.37 (0.29) 0.38 (0.30) 0.34 (0.25) 0.29 (0.22) 0.31 (0.24) 0.37 (0.33)
IGF-I SDS (Brabant)
 n 142 197 339 175 129 304 495 438 933 1576
 Mean (SD) −1.93 (1.72) −1.79 (2.37) −1.85 (2.12) −0.90 (1.46) −0.94 (1.79) −0.92 (1.61) −0.493 (1.47) −0.58 (1.60) −0.53 (1.53) −0.89 (1.77)
BMI, kg/m2
 n 177 226 403 199 148 347 556 504 1060 1810
 Mean (SD) 27.3 (8.5) 25.7 (5.9) 26.4 (7.2) 30.2
(8.5)
29.5 (6.8) 29.9 (7.8) 30.5(8.2) 30.5 (5.8) 30.5 (7.2) 29.5 (7.5)
Waist circumference, cm
 n 69 100 169 95 73 168 238 244 482 819
 Mean (SD) 88.8 (19.5) 92.1 (12.9) 90.73 (15.95) 90.8
(17.7)
99.5 (15.4) 94.55 (17.25) 95.9 (17.9) 103.6 (13.4) 99.78 (16.26) 96.84 (16.80)
HbA1c, %
 n 78 92 170 69 59 128 184 224 408 706
 Mean (SD) 5.1 (0.8) 5.1
(0.8)
5.1 (0.8) 5.3
(1.0)
5.3(1.3) 5.3 (1.1) 5.4 (0.9) 5.4 (0.8) 5.4 (0.8) 5.3 (0.9)
Non-HDL cholesterol, mmol/L
 n 83 92 175 73 61 134 197 226 423 732
 Mean (SD) 3.88 (1.19) 3.67 (1.07) 3.77 (1.13) 4.23
(1.35)
4.25 (1.40) 4.24 (1.37) 4.24 (1.05) 4.54 (1.30) 4.40 (1.20) 4.22 (1.24)
Duration of follow-up, y
 n 245 309 554 268 220 488 725 682 1407 2449
 Mean (SD) 5.04 (4.45) 4.85 (4.38) 3.77 (1.13) 4.68
(4.15)
5.46 (5.12) 4.24 (1.37) 4.86 (4.22) 5.51 (4.73) 4.40 (1.20) 4.22 (1.24)
Etiology, n (%)
 Pituitary tumorsb 126 (22.7) 183 (37.0) 657 (46.4) 966 (39.1)
 Pituitary adenoma 112 (20.1) 154 (31.2) 579 (40.9) 845 (34.2)
 Prolactin-secreting tumor 5 (0.9) 17 (3.4) 46 (3.3) 68 (2.8)
 Acromegaly 2 (0.4) 1 (0.2) 11 (0.78) 14 (0.6)
 Cushing's syndrome 6 (1.1) 10 (2.0) 19 (1.3) 35 (1.4)
 TSH-secreting tumor 1 (0.2) 2 (0.1) 3 (0.1)
 Pituitary apoplexy 1 (0.2) 1 (0.0)
Cranial tumorsb 147 (26.4) 76 (15.4) 142 (10.1) 365 (14.9)
 Postprocedural hypopituitarism 37 (6.6) 29 (5.9) 71 (5.0) 137 (5.6)
 Craniopharyngioma 43 (7.7) 28 (5.7) 58 (4.1) 129 (5.2)
 Irradiation 40 (7.2) 9 (1.8) 5 (0.4) 54 (2.2)
 Medulloblastoma 2 (0.4) 2 (0.1)
 Meningioma 1 (0.2) 1 (0.2) 3 (0.2) 5 (0.2)
 Astrocytoma 10 (1.8) 3 (0.6) 3 (0.2) 16 (0.7)
 Germinoma 9 (1.6) 6 (1.2) 1 (0.1) 16 (0.7)
 Glioma 5 (0.9) 1 (0.1) 6 (0.2)
Vascular 5 (0.9) 18 (3.6) 34 (2.4) 57 (2.4)
 Sheehan syndrome 5 (0.9) 18 (3.6) 32 (2.3) 55 (2.3)
 Subarachnoid hemorrhage 2 (0.1) 2 (0.1)
Infiltrative/inflammatory disease 4 (0.8) 1 (0.2) 3 (0.2) 8 (0.4)
 Granulomatous 2 (0.4) 2 (0.1) 4 (0.2)
 Neurofibromatosis 1 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.1)
 Langerhans' cell histiocytosis 1 (0.2) 1 (0.2) 2 (0.1)
Isolated/idiopathic GHD 76 (13.6) 79 (16.0) 249 (17.6) 404 (16.4)
Congenital GHD 68 (12.2) 27 (5.5) 31 (2.2) 126 (5.1)
Acquired GHD (unspecified) 19 (3.4) 16 (3.2) 48 (3.4) 83 (3.4)
Traumatic brain injury 10 (1.8) 23 (4.7) 38 (2.7) 71 (2.9)
Empty sella syndrome 1 (0.2) 1 (0.2) 4 (0.3) 6 (0.2)
Hypothalamic dysfunctionc 8 (1.4) 6 (1.2) 24 (1.7) 38 (1.5)
Not reported or missing 94 (16.9) 64 (13.0) 187 (13.2) 345 (14.0)

Abbreviations: ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; BMI, body mass index; EAS, effectiveness analysis set; FAS, full analysis set; GHD, GH deficiency; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IGHD, isolated GH deficiency; IOS, International Outcome Study; MPHD, multiple pituitary hormone deficiency; SDS, SD score.

aFemale, group 1 vs 2, P < .05: IGF-I. Female, group 1 vs 3, P < .05: IGF-I. Male, group 1 vs 3, P < .05: GH dose at baseline, IGF-I, BMI, non-HDL cholesterol. All other comparisons of groups stratified by sex were not significant (P > .05). Age at treatment start was not tested for significance.

bStated etiology and/or its respective treatment.

cNot elsewhere classified.

dFemale, group 1 vs 2, P < .05: GH dose at baseline, IGF-I, BMI. Male, group 1 vs 2, P < .05: GH dose at baseline, IGF-I, BMI, HbA1c, non-HDL cholesterol. Female, group 1 vs 3, P < .05: GH dose at baseline, IGF-I, BMI, waist circumference. Male, group 1 vs 3, P < .05: GH dose at baseline, IGF-I, BMI, waist circumference, non-HDL cholesterol. Female, group 2 vs 3, P < .05: IGF-I. Male, group 2 vs 3, P < .05: GH dose at baseline, HbA1c. All other comparisons of groups stratified by sex were not significant (P > .05). Age at treatment start was not tested for significance.

Reported etiologies for AGHD are summarized in Table 1. The most common etiologies in the EAS included pituitary tumors (group 1, 31.2%; group 2, 40.3%; group 3, 47.0%), cranial tumors (group 1, 25.6%; group 2, 15.3%; group 3, 9.8%), and isolated/idiopathic GH deficiency (group 1, 8.1%; group 2, 18.7%; group 3, 22.8%). The most common etiologies in the FAS also included pituitary tumors (group 1, 22.7%; group 2, 37.0%; group 3, 46.4%), cranial tumors (group 1, 26.4%; group 2, 15.4%; group 3, 10.1%), and isolated/idiopathic GH deficiency (group 1, 13.6%; group 2, 16.0%; group 3, 17.6%).

Baseline characteristics for the EAS and FAS were also analyzed by age group and sex (Table 1). Age at the start of treatment did not notably differ by sex within each age group. In group 1 of the EAS, IGF-I levels were lower in women; however, IGF-I levels were higher in women vs men in groups 2 and 3. Notably, group 1 had a higher proportion of female patients taking oral estrogen compared with the other age groups. In the EAS, the proportion of women with IGF-1 SDS recorded at baseline who were on oral estrogen was 23.2%, 7.6%, and 8.4% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In the FAS, the proportion of women with IGF-1 SDS recorded at baseline who were on oral estrogen was 16.2%, 6.9%, and 7.3% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean duration of follow-up was similar between male and female patients of all groups, ranging from 4.44 years to 5.34 years in the EAS and 4.68 years to 5.51 years in the FAS.

Safety Analyses

NSARs, SARs, and SAEs were analyzed and compared between age groups (Table 2). SAR and SAE events were mutually exclusive. No statistically significant differences in the incidence rates of NSARs, SARs, or SAEs were observed between the 3 groups. In the FAS, “neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified” and “nervous system disorders” were among the most common SARs in all groups (Table 3). The most common NSARs in all groups included “musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders,” “nervous system disorders,” and “general disorders and administration site conditions.” The most common AEs (Table 4) in all groups included “nervous system disorders,” “musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders,” and “neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified.” The most common SAEs included “neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified” (group 1, 0.54%; group 2, 0.61%; group 3, 1.34%), “nervous system disorders” (group 1, 0.90%; group 2, 0.61%; group 3, 0.64%), and “infections and infestations” (group 1, 0.18%; group 2, 1.42%; group 3, 0.42%). Notably, the “neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified” incidence was numerically higher in the oldest age group (group 3) compared to groups 1 and 2 when reported as an SAR, AE, or SAE. Of the 10 total deaths recorded, 2 cases (1 due to metastatic colon cancer and 1 due to anaplastic astrocytoma) were deemed possibly related to treatment.

Table 2.

Adverse reactions and events from the FAS by age groupa

  Patient-years Patients with events Rate/1000 patient-years Comparison vs 40-59 y, IRRb (95% CI) P-value Comparison vs 30-39 y, IRR (95% CI) P-value
NSARs
 Group 1: 18-29 yc 2733 9 3.29 0.61 (0.30-1.27) .19 0.62 (0.27-1.46) .27
 Group 2: 30-39 yd 2456 13 5.29 0.99 (0.53-1.85) .97
 Group 3: 40-59 ye 7282 39 5.36
SARs
 Group 1: 18-29 yc 2733 2 0.73 0.28 (0.07-1.20) .09 0.30 (0.06-1.48) .14
 Group 2: 30-39 yd 2456 6 2.44 0.94 (0.37-2.34) .89
 Group 3: 40-59 ye 7282 19 2.61
SAEs
 Group 1: 18-29 yc 2733 14 5.12 0.58 (0.33-1.04) .07 0.63 (0.32-1.25) .19
 Group 2: 30-39 yd 2456 20 8.14 0.93 (0.56-1.53) .77
 Group 3: 40-59 ye 7282 64 8.79

Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; FAS, full analysis set; GHRT, GH replacement therapy; IRR, incidence rate ratio; NSAR, nonserious adverse reaction; SAE, serious adverse event; SAR, serious adverse reaction.

aSARs and NSARs were defined as an AE or SAE with a suspected causal (possibly or probably) relationship to short-acting GHRT, as determined by either the investigator or the sponsor. Other SAEs not considered related to short-acting GHRT are also presented.

bIncidence rates are per 1000 patient-years.

cn = 554.

dn = 488.

en = 1407.

Table 3.

Summary of nonserious and serious adverse reactions for adult patients with AGHD in the FAS from NordiNet IOS and the ANSWER Program stratified by age group

    Group 1
Aged 18-29 y
n = 558
Group 2
Aged 30-39 y
n = 494
Group 3
Aged 40-59 y
n = 1417
SOC PT E n (%) E n (%) E n (%)
Total
 NSAR All 14 9 1.613 33 13 2.632 53 39 2.752
 SAR All 2 2 0.358 8 6 1.215 26 19 1.341
Endocrine disorders
 SAR All 1 1 0.071
Pituitary hemorrhage 1 1 0.071
Gastrointestinal disorders
 NSAR All 3 1 0.179 1 1 0.071
Abdominal pain 1 1 0.179
Abdominal pain upper 1 1 0.179
Diarrhea 1 1 0.071
Nausea 1 1 0.179
General disorders and administration site conditions
 NSAR All 2 2 0.358 6 4 0.81 8 8 0.565
Fatigue 1 1 0.071
Injection site reaction 1 1 0.179
Edema 5 3 0.607 6 6 0.423
Edema peripheral 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.071
Peripheral swelling 1 1 0.202
 SAR All 1 1 0.202
Condition aggravated 1 1 0.202
Immune system disorders
 NSAR All 1 1 0.071
Hypersensitivity 1 1 0.071
Infections and infestations
 NSAR All 1 1 0.202
Gastroenteritis 1 1 0.202
 SAR All 1 1 0.071
Respiratory tract infection 1 1 0.071
Injury, poisoning, and procedural complications
 NSAR All 1 1 0.179
Off-label use 1 1 0.179
 SAR All 2 2 0.141
Fracture 1 1 0.071
Meniscus injury 1 1 0.071
Investigations
 NSAR All 1 1 0.071
Weight increased 1 1 0.071
 SAR All 1 1 0.071
Cortisol abnormal 1 1 0.071
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
 NSAR All 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.202 6 6 0.423
Abnormal loss of weight 1 1 0.179
Hyperglycemia 1 1 0.202 4 4 0.283
Type 2 diabetes mellitus 2 2 0.141
 SAR All 2 2 0.141
Type 2 diabetes mellitus 2 2 0.141
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
 NSAR All 3 3 0.538 13 6 1.215 19 16 1.129
Arthralgia 2 2 0.358 6 5 1.012 11 11 0.776
Joint stiffness 2 2 0.405 4 4 0.282
Myalgia 1 1 0.179 5 4 0.81 4 4 0.282
 SAR All 1 1 0.202
Myalgia 1 1 0.202
Neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified (including cysts and polyps)
 NSAR All 1 1 0.071
Glioma 1 1 0.071
 SAR All 3 3 0.607 14 12 0.847
Anaplastic astrocytoma 1 1 0.202
Bronchial carcinoma 1 1 0.071
Colon cancer metastatic 1 1 0.071
Enchondromatosis 1 1 0.071
Nasal sinus cancer 1 1 0.202
Neoplasm 1 1 0.071
Neoplasm malignant 3 3 0.212
Neoplasm progression 1 1 0.071
Nonsecretory adenoma of pituitary 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Papillary renal cell carcinoma 1 1 0.071
Pituitary cancer metastatic 1 1 0.071
Pituitary neoplasm malignant recurrent 1 1 0.071
Pituitary tumor benign 2 2 0.141
Nervous system disorders
 NSAR All 2 2 0.358 10 7 1.417 12 10 0.706
Carpal tunnel syndrome 3 3 0.212
Dizziness 1 1 0.179
Headache 1 1 0.179 10 7 1.417 8 6 0.423
Paresthesia 1 1 0.071
 SAR All 2 2 0.358 3 2 0.405 2 2 0.141
Carpal tunnel syndrome 2 2 0.141
Headache 2 1 0.202
Seizure 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.202
Syncope 1 1 0.179
Psychiatric disorders
 NSAR All 1 1 0.071
Mood swings 1 1 0.071
Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders
 SAR All 1 1 0.071
Pulmonary embolism 1 1 0.071
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
 NSAR All 2 2 0.358 2 2 0.405 3 3 0.212
Acne 1 1 0.202
Hair disorder 1 1 0.071
Pruritus 1 1 0.071
Rash 2 2 0.358 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Surgical and medical procedures
 SAR All 1 1 0.071
Hospitalization 1 1 0.071
Vascular disorders
 SAR All 1 1 0.071
Venous thrombosis 1 1 0.071

Abbreviations: ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; E, events; IOS, International Outcome Study; n, number of patients in each group; NSAR, nonserious adverse reaction; PT, preferred term; SAR, serious adverse reaction; SOC, system organ class.

Table 4.

Summary of adverse events for adult patients with AGHD in the FAS from NordiNet IOS and the ANSWER Program stratified by age group

    Group 1
Aged 18-29 y
n = 558
Group 2
Aged 30-39 y
n = 494
Group 3
Aged 40-59 y
n = 1417
SOC PT E n (%) E n (%) E n (%)
Total Total 40 23 4.122 82 32 6.478 183 114 8.045
Blood and lymphatic system disorders All 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.202
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura 1 1 0.202
Iron deficiency anemia 1 1 0.179
Cardiac disorders All 2 1 0.179 2 2 0.405 5 5 0.353
Arrhythmia 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.202 2 2 0.141
Cardiac failure 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Myocardial ischemia 1 1 0.071
Myocarditis 1 1 0.179
Tachycardia 1 1 0.071
Congenital, familial, and genetic disorders All 1 1 0.071
Type V hyperlipidemia 1 1 0.071
Ear and labyrinth disorders All 1 1 0.071
Vertigo 1 1 0.071
Endocrine disorders All 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.202 4 4 0.282
Adrenal insufficiency 1 1 0.071
Adrenocortical insufficiency acute 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Glucocorticoid deficiency 1 1 0.071
Pituitary hemorrhage 1 1 0.071
Gastrointestinal disorders All 3 1 0.179 2 2 0.405 7 6 0.423
Abdominal pain 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.071
Abdominal pain upper 1 1 0.179
Diarrhea 2 2 0.141
Gastric ulcer hemorrhage 1 1 0.071
Inflammatory bowel disease 1 1 0.202
Nausea 1 1 0.179
Esophageal spasm 1 1 0.202
Pancreatitis 2 2 0.141
Vomiting 1 1 0.071
General disorders and administration site conditions All 2 2 0.358 10 8 1.619 14 14 0.988
Chest pain 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Condition aggravated 1 1 0.202 2 2 0.141
Death 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Fatigue 2 2 0.141
General physical health deterioration 1 1 0.202
Injection site reaction 1 1 0.179
Edema 5 3 0.607 6 6 0.423
Edema peripheral 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.071
Peripheral swelling 1 1 0.202
Pyrexia 1 1 0.071
Hepatobiliary disorders All 4 3 0.212
Biliary colic 1 1 0.071
Cholelithiasis 1 1 0.071
Hepatorenal syndrome 1 1 0.071
Liver disorder 1 1 0.071
Immune system disorders All 1 1 0.071
Hypersensitivity 1 1 0.071
Infections and infestations All 1 1 0.179 11 8 1.619 8 7 0.494
Appendicitis 1 1 0.202
Cellulitis 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Chronic sinusitis 1 1 0.071
Cystitis 1 1 0.202
Endocarditis 1 1 0.179
Gastroenteritis 3 3 0.607
Gastroenteritis norovirus 1 1 0.071
Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome 1 1 0.202
Hepatitis C 1 1 0.071
Influenza 1 1 0.071
Pyelonephritis 1 1 0.071
Respiratory tract infection 1 1 0.071
Sepsis 1 1 0.202
Sinusitis 1 1 0.071
Tonsillitis 1 1 0.202
Urinary tract infection 2 1 0.202
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications All 3 3 0.538 2 2 0.405 7 6 0.423
Accident at work 1 1 0.071
Contusion 1 1 0.202
Fracture 3 3 0.212
Lower limb fracture 1 1 0.179
Meniscus injury 1 1 0.071
Off-label use 1 1 0.179
Postprocedural hemorrhage 1 1 0.071
Spinal compression fracture 1 1 0.071
Stab wound 1 1 0.179
Toxicity to various agents 1 1 0.202
Investigations All 5 5 0.353
Cortisol abnormal 1 1 0.071
Cortisol decreased 3 3 0.212
Weight increased 1 1 0.071
Metabolism and nutrition disorders All 2 2 0.358 3 2 0.405 9 9 0.635
Abnormal loss of weight 1 1 0.179
Hyperglycemia 1 1 0.202 4 4 0.283
Hypokalemia 2 2 0.405
Hyponatremia 1 1 0.179
Type 2 diabetes mellitus 4 4 0.282
Vitamin D deficiency 1 1 0.071
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders All 4 3 0.538 15 8 1.619 30 23 1.623
Arthralgia 2 2 0.358 6 5 1.012 11 11 0.776
Arthritis 1 1 0.071
Fibromyalgia 1 1 0.071
Intervertebral disc protrusion 4 4 0.282
Joint stiffness 2 2 0.405 4 4 0.282
Lumbar spinal stenosis 1 1 0.071
Myalgia 1 1 0.179 6 5 1.012 4 4 0.282
Osteoarthritis 1 1 0.071
Psoriatic arthropathy 1 1 0.202
Rhabdomyolysis 1 1 0.071
Scoliosis 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.071
Spinal column stenosis 1 1 0.071
Neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified (including cysts and polyps) All 3 3 0.538 6 6 1.215 38 32 2.258
Acute myeloid leukemia 1 1 0.071
Anaplastic astrocytoma 1 1 0.202
Astrocytoma malignant 1 1 0.179
B-cell lymphoma stage IV 1 1 0.202
Bronchial carcinoma 1 1 0.071
Colon cancer metastatic 1 1 0.071
Craniopharyngioma 1 1 0.179
Enchondromatosis 1 1 0.071
Follicle center lymphoma, follicular grade I, II, III 1 1 0.071
Gastric cancer stage 0 1 1 0.071
Glioma 1 1 0.071
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm 1 1 0.071
Lipoma 1 1 0.202
Lung adenocarcinoma 1 1 0.071
Malignant melanoma 1 1 0.071
Nasal sinus cancer 1 1 0.202
Neoplasm 1 1 0.071
Neoplasm malignant 12 11 0.776
Neoplasm progression 2 2 0.141
Neoplasm recurrence 1 1 0.179
Nonsecretory adenoma of pituitary 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Esophageal cancer metastatic 1 1 0.071
Papillary renal cell carcinoma 1 1 0.071
Pituitary cancer metastatic 1 1 0.071
Pituitary neoplasm malignant recurrent 1 1 0.071
Pituitary tumor 1 1 0.202 2 2 0.141
Pituitary tumor benign 3 3 0.212
Prostate cancer 2 2 0.141
Renal cancer 1 1 0.071
Nervous system disorders All 11 8 1.434 24 10 2.024 24 20 1.411
Aphasia 1 1 0.202
Ataxia 1 1 0.202
Carpal tunnel syndrome 5 5 0.353
Cerebral infarction 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.071
Cerebrospinal fluid leakage 1 1 0.179
Cerebrovascular accident 1 1 0.179 1 1 0.071
Dizziness 1 1 0.179
Facial paresis 1 1 0.179
Generalized tonic-clonic seizure 1 1 0.202
Headache 1 1 0.179 12 8 1.619 8 6 0.423
Ischemic stroke 1 1 0.071
Loss of consciousness 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Migraine 1 1 0.202
Multiple sclerosis 1 1 0.071
Paresthesia 1 1 0.071
Presyncope 1 1 0.202
Sciatica 1 1 0.071
Seizure 3 2 0.358 3 2 0.405
Syncope 2 2 0.358 3 2 0.405 1 1 0.071
Toxic encephalopathy 1 1 0.071
Transient ischemic attack 2 1 0.071
Pregnancy, puerperium, and perinatal conditions All 1 1 0.179
Preeclampsia 1 1 0.179
Psychiatric disorders All 3 1 0.179 7 4 0.282
Bipolar disorder 1 1 0.071
Completed suicide 1 1 0.071
Depression 1 1 0.179 2 2 0.141
Mental disorder 1 1 0.071
Mood swings 1 1 0.071
Stress 1 1 0.071
Suicide attempt 2 1 0.179
Renal and urinary disorders All 1 1 0.202 2 2 0.141
Nephrolithiasis 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Renal failure 1 1 0.071
Reproductive system and breast disorders All 1 1 0.202
Uterine hemorrhage 1 1 0.202
Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders All 3 2 0.141
Pulmonary embolism 3 2 0.141
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders All 2 2 0.358 2 2 0.405 3 3 0.212
Acne 1 1 0.202
Hair disorder 1 1 0.071
Pruritus 1 1 0.071
Rash 2 2 0.358 1 1 0.202 1 1 0.071
Surgical and medical procedures All 1 1 0.179 5 5 0.353
Cholecystectomy 2 2 0.141
Cholecystostomy 1 1 0.071
Hospitalization 1 1 0.071
Pituitary tumor removal 1 1 0.071
Wisdom teeth removal 1 1 0.179
Vascular disorders All 1 1 0.202 5 4 0.282
Deep vein thrombosis 1 1 0.071
Hypertension 2 2 0.141
Thrombosis 1 1 0.202
Venous thrombosis 1 1 0.071
Venous thrombosis limb 1 1 0.071

Abbreviations: ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; E, events; IOS, International Outcome Study; n, number of patients in each group; PT, preferred term; SOC, system organ class.

Efficacy Analyses

Mean GH dose for patients in the EAS (Fig. 1) and FAS (Fig. 2) was analyzed by age group and sex. In female patients of all groups, the mean GH dose was higher for patients who were treated for a longer duration. Mean GH doses were similar between male patients aged 18 to 29 years and 40 to 59 years with different treatment durations, whereas mean GH dose was lower for males aged 18 to 29 years who were treated for a longer duration. No differences were observed in mean GH dose between male patients in the FAS with different treatment durations, regardless of age group.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mean GH exposure for (A) female and (B) male patients with AGHD in the EAS from NordiNet® IOS and the ANSWER Program stratified by age and sex. Error bars represent ± SE.

Abbreviations: AGHD, adult GH deficiency; ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; EAS, effectiveness analysis set.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Mean GH exposure for (A) female and (B) male patients with AGHD in the FAS from NordiNet IOS and the ANSWER Program stratified by age and sex. Error bars represent ± SE.

Abbreviations: AGHD, adult GH deficiency; ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; FAS, full analysis set.

Mean GH dose was also analyzed by estrogen use for female patients in the EAS (Fig. 3) and FAS (Fig. 4). In the EAS and FAS, the mean GH dose was higher for female patients who were treated for a longer duration, regardless of estrogen use. In group 3 of both cohorts, there was no noticeable difference in mean GH dose between patients with different treatment durations.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Mean GH exposure for female patients with AGHD in the EAS from NordiNet International Outcome Study and the ANSWER Program either (A) using any form of estrogen (oral, vaginal, or patch) or (B) not using any form of estrogen. Error bars represent ± SE.

Abbreviations: AGHD, adult GH deficiency; ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; EAS, effectiveness analysis set.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Mean GH exposure for female patients with AGHD in the FAS from NordiNet International Outcome Study and the ANSWER Program either (A) using any form of estrogen (oral, vaginal, or patch) or (B) not using any form of estrogen. Error bars represent ± SE.

Abbreviations: AGHD, adult GH deficiency; ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; EAS, effectiveness analysis set.

Mean IGF-I SDS levels were determined for adult patients in the EAS and stratified by both age group and sex (Fig. 5). By year 2, the proportion of patients within the normal range (−2 to +2) of IGF-I SDS had increased in all groups to ≥80% and remained >80% over most of the follow-up years and up to year 10.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

IGF-I SDS levels for (A) female, (B) male, and (C) all adult patients with AGHD in the NordiNet International Outcome Study and the ANSWER Program stratified by age and sex.

Abbreviations: AGHD, adult GH deficiency; ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; EAS, effectiveness analysis set; SDS, SD score.

Mean (SD) HbA1c levels were analyzed from year 0 to 2 for adult patients in the EAS and FAS by age group and sex (Table 5). No notable change was observed within this time frame for female or male patients in either the EAS or the FAS, regardless of age group.

Table 5.

Mean HbA1c of adult patients in the EAS and FAS from NordiNet IOS and the ANSWER Program stratified by age group and sex

  Group 1
Aged 18-29 y
Group 2
Aged 30-39 y
Group 3
Aged 40-59 y
  Female Male Female Male Female Male
  n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD)
EAS
HbA1c, %
 Year 0 36 5.3 (0.9) 31 5.0 (0.8) 38 5.2 (0.8) 31 5.3 (1.5) 103 5.3 (0.7) 147 5.4 (0.8)
 Year 2 17 5.5 (1.0) 22 5.1 (0.6) 32 5.2 (0.7) 23 5.3 (1.0) 72 5.4 (1.0) 92 5.3 (0.8)
FAS
HbA1c, %
 Year 0 78 5.1 (0.8) 92 5.1 (0.8) 69 5.3 (1.0) 59 5.3 (1.3) 184 5.4 (0.9) 224 5.4 (0.8)
 Year 2 47 5.2 (0.9) 56 5.3 (1.0) 48 5.3 (0.7) 51 5.2 (0.8) 142 5.4 (1.0) 153 5.3 (1.0)

Abbreviations: ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; EAS, effectiveness analysis set; FAS, full analysis set; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; IOS, International Outcome Study.

Mean non-HDL cholesterol was analyzed from year 0 to 2 for adult patients in the EAS and FAS by age group and sex (Table 6). In both female and male patients in all age groups of the FAS, a decrease was observed between 0 and 2 years. No notable change was observed for female or male patients in the EAS.

Table 6.

Mean non-HDL cholesterol of adult patients in the EAS and FAS from NordiNet IOS and the ANSWER Program stratified by age group and sex

  Group 1
Aged 18-29 y
Group 2
Aged 30-39 y
Group 3
Aged 40-59 y
  Female Male Female Male Female Male
  n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD)
EAS
Non-HDL cholesterol, mmol/L
 Year 0 34 4.08 (1.20) 37 3.95 (1.18) 38 4.06 (1.37) 34 4.11 (1.20) 111 4.38 (1.12) 148 4.63 (1.34)
 Year 2 17 3.89 (1.12) 18 3.26 (0.97) 28 3.95 (1.23) 20 4.22 (1.43) 67 4.27 (1.10) 93 4.13 (1.20)
FAS
Non-HDL cholesterol, mmol/L
 Year 0 83 3.88 (1.19) 92 3.67 (1.07) 73 4.23 (1.35) 61 4.25 (1.40) 197 4.24 (1.05) 226 4.54 (1.30)
 Year 2 51 3.74 (0.99) 50 3.58 (1.08) 45 4.06 (1.18) 46 3.94 (1.25) 130 4.08 (1.07) 151 4.26 (1.21)

Abbreviations: ANSWER, American Norditropin Studies: Web Enabled Research; EAS, effectiveness analysis set; FAS, full analysis set; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IOS, International Outcome Study.

Discussion

Evaluation of the safety of short-acting GHRT in adult patients with AGHD aged 18 to 59 years revealed no significant differences in the incidence of NSARs and SARs or SAEs between age groups. The most common SAE reported was “neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified” with a rate of 0.54%, 0.61%, and 1.34% across groups of increasing age (groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). This is consistent with an observational study of patients treated with GH, aged 6 to 91 years, from 1994 to 2012 [15]. The most common treatment-related SAE was tumor/neoplasm recurrence, observed at a rate of 1.3%. This is supported by a previous report establishing greater risk of myeloid neoplasm occurrence with increasing age [16], as well as a higher overall incidence of cancer with older age groups and an increase in the incidence of cancer in younger age groups over time [17].

It is important to note that recent evidence-based guidance released by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Endocrinology on the use of recombinant human GHRT acknowledge that there are no data to support an increased risk of cancer or recurrence of tumors in the hypothalamic-pituitary region of adults taking GHRT. However, it is recommended to continue long-term monitoring and cancer screening in these patients for the purpose of safety surveillance [18]. Additionally, a previous study has shown that tumor progression within the hypothalamic–pituitary region did not differ between patients treated with or without GHRT, and recurrence risk was similar between these 2 groups. Independent predictors of recurrence included the use of radiotherapy and residual tumor [19]. Family history and increasing age may also be predictors of cancer recurrence in patients with AGHD [20, 21]. A previous study examining registry data for patients with AGHD has also demonstrated that mortality due to malignancies was not elevated in patients receiving GHRT [22]. Similarly, a study examining the Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study registry safety data in patients with AGHD treated with or without GHRT showed no significant difference in the overall rate of cancer incidence between these two groups [23, 24]. Similar to the safety events reported here, the Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study registry reported additional safety events including arthralgia, peripheral edema, and myalgia [25].

No notable changes were observed for any of the age groups in HbA1c levels from year 0 to 2. This observation is supported by previous analyses establishing no change in HbA1c levels from baseline over the course of 1 to 2 years [26, 27]. Additionally, a decrease in mean non-HDL cholesterol levels was observed in all groups of the FAS from year 0 to 2. Previous studies have similarly established a significant decrease in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with GH treatment in adult patients over the course of 6 months [28, 29].

Limitations

Registry data is a helpful tool to establish general ideas of safety and efficacy but may be in part limited by patient dropout and missing data. Limitations of the current analyses include decreasing n values over time, and therefore, patient dropout and missing information may limit the longitudinal scope of the data. The cause for patient dropout may be attributed to not only a preference to stop or switch GH treatment but also to the limitations of insurance coverage. In this context, registries lose impact due to the method in which the health system imposes changes on patient treatment plans. Additionally, registry data input is not a mandatory task and therefore not standardized. Consequently, some variables of this dataset may remain incomplete. Nonserious AEs were not systematically collected, introducing a further limitation to the dataset.

Conclusions

This study aimed to establish the real-world safety and efficacy of short-acting GHRT in adult patients with AGHD among different age groups. No significant differences in the risk of short-acting GHRT–related adverse reactions were observed across age groups. By year 2, ≥ 80% of patients across all groups had a normal IGF-I SDS. Together, these results indicate the safety and efficacy of short-acting GHRT for the treatment of AGHD, regardless of age.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the medical writing assistance of Amy Ryan, PhD, of Precision AQ, which was supported financially by Novo Nordisk Inc. (Plainsboro, NJ), in compliance with international Good Publication Practice guidelines.

Contributor Information

John D Carmichael, Email: john.carmichael@med.usc.edu, Endocrinology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

Atil Y Kargi, Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Laura Dichtel, Neuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Nicky Kelepouris, US Medical Affairs, Rare Endocrine Disorders, Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ 08536, USA.

Navid Nedjatian, Global Medical Affairs, Rare Endocrine Disorders, Novo Nordisk Health Care AG, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.

Moshe Fridman, Scientific Analytics, Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ 08536, USA.

Matthias M Weber, Unit of Endocrinology, Medical Department, University Hospital, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, der Johannes Gutenberg Universität, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

Funding

This study was funded by Novo Nordisk Inc.

Disclosures

J.D.C. has consulted for Novo Nordisk Inc., Camurus, and Xeris Biopharma. A.Y.K. has consulted for Corcept Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk Inc., Ascendis Pharma, Recordati, Camurus, and Xeris Biopharma. L.D. has received study medication and/or research support from Pfizer, Perspectum Ltd., Lumos Pharma, Recordati, and Novo Nordisk Inc. She is a consultant for Lumos Pharma, Marea Therapeutics, and Merida Biosciences. She has equity in Marea Therapeutics and Merida Biosciences. She is a fellow at Third Rock Ventures through the Mass General Brigham's Innovation Fellows Program but remained a full-time employee of Mass General Brigham during the course of this educational program (October 1, 2022-September 30, 2024). N.K. is an employee of Novo Nordisk Inc. N.N. is an employee of Novo Nordisk Health Care AG. M.F. is a contingent/contract employee of Novo Nordisk Inc. M.W. received honoraria as a speaker or board member from Ipsen, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk Inc.

Data Availability

Some or all datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Laursen  T, Jorgensen  JO, Christiansen  JS. The management of adult growth hormone deficiency syndrome. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008;9(14):2435‐2450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chrisoulidou  A, Kousta  E, Beshyah  SA, Robinson  S, Johnston  DG. How much, and by what mechanisms, does growth hormone replacement improve the quality of life in GH-deficient adults?  Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;12(2):261‐279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. McGauley  GA. Quality of life assessment before and after growth hormone treatment in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1989;356:70‐72; discussion 73-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rosen  T, Wiren  L, Wilhelmsen  L, Wiklund  I, Bengtsson  BA. Decreased psychological well-being in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;40(1):111‐116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Blum  WF, Shavrikova  EP, Edwards  DJ, et al.  Decreased quality of life in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency compared with general populations using the new, validated, self-weighted questionnaire, questions on life satisfaction hypopituitarism module. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(9):4158‐4167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Brod  M, Beck  JF, Hojbjerre  L, et al.  Assessing the impact of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults: interpreting change of the Treatment-Related Impact Measure-Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency (TRIM-AGHD). Pharmacoecon Open. 2019;3(1):71‐80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Burman  P, Broman  JE, Hetta  J, et al.  Quality of life in adults with growth hormone (GH) deficiency: response to treatment with recombinant human GH in a placebo-controlled 21-month trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(12):3585‐3590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cuneo  RC, Judd  S, Wallace  JD, et al.  The Australian multicenter trial of growth hormone (GH) treatment in GH-deficient adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(1):107‐116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Stouthart  PJ, Deijen  JB, Roffel  M, Delemarre-van de Waal  HA. Quality of life of growth hormone (GH) deficient young adults during discontinuation and restart of GH therapy. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2003;28(5):612‐626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. McMillan  CV, Bradley  C, Gibney  J, Healy  ML, Russell-Jones  DL, Sonksen  PH. Psychological effects of withdrawal of growth hormone therapy from adults with growth hormone deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003;59(4):467‐475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Reed  ML, Merriam  GR, Kargi  AY. Adult growth hormone deficiency—benefits, side effects, and risks of growth hormone replacement. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2013;4:64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hoybye  C, Savendahl  L, Christesen  HT, et al.  The NordiNet(R) International Outcome Study and NovoNet(R) ANSWER Program(R): rationale, design, and methodology of two international pharmacoepidemiological registry-based studies monitoring long-term clinical and safety outcomes of growth hormone therapy (Norditropin(R)). Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:119‐127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Biller  BMK, Hoybye  C, Ferran  JM, et al.  Long-term effectiveness and safety of GH replacement therapy in adults >/=60 years: data from NordiNet(R) IOS and ANSWER. J Endocr Soc. 2023;7(6):bvad054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Iranmanesh  A, South  S, Liem  AY, et al.  Unequal impact of age, percentage body fat, and serum testosterone concentrations on the somatotrophic, IGF-I, and IGF-binding protein responses to a three-day intravenous growth hormone-releasing hormone pulsatile infusion in men. Eur J Endocrinol. 1998;139(1):59‐71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Johannsson  G, Touraine  P, Feldt-Rasmussen  U, et al.  Long-term safety of growth hormone in adults with growth hormone deficiency: overview of 15 809 GH-treated patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(7):1906‐1919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gu  M, Kovilakam  SC, Dunn  WG, et al.  Multiparameter prediction of myeloid neoplasia risk. Nat Genet. 2023;55(9):1523‐1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kehm  RD, Yang  W, Tehranifar  P, Terry  MB. 40 years of change in age- and stage-specific cancer incidence rates in US women and men. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019;3(3):pkz038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Yuen  KCJ, Biller  BMK, Radovick  S, et al.  American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology guidelines for management of growth hormone deficiency in adults and patients transitioning from pediatric to adult care. Endocr Pract. 2019;25(11):1191‐1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Gasco  V, Caputo  M, Cambria  V, et al.  Progression of pituitary tumours: impact of GH secretory status and long-term GH replacement therapy. Endocrine. 2019;63(2):341‐347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Pekic  S, Stojanovic  M, Popovic  V. Controversies in the risk of neoplasia in GH deficiency. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;31(1):35‐47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Felicetti  F, Fortunati  N, Arvat  E, Brignardello  E. GH deficiency in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;30(6):795‐804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. van Bunderen  CC, van Nieuwpoort  IC, Arwert  LI, et al.  Does growth hormone replacement therapy reduce mortality in adults with growth hormone deficiency? Data from the Dutch National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment in adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(10):3151‐3159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Child  CJ, Conroy  D, Zimmermann  AG, Woodmansee  WW, Erfurth  EM, Robison  LL. Incidence of primary cancers and intracranial tumour recurrences in GH-treated and untreated adult hypopituitary patients: analyses from the Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172(6):779‐790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Child  CJ, Zimmermann  AG, Woodmansee  WW, et al.  Assessment of primary cancers in GH-treated adult hypopituitary patients: an analysis from the Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(2):217‐223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hartman  ML, Xu  R, Crowe  BJ, et al.  Prospective safety surveillance of GH-deficient adults: comparison of GH-treated vs untreated patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):980‐988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Chihara  K, Kato  Y, Kohno  H, et al.  Efficacy and safety of growth hormone (GH) in the treatment of adult Japanese patients with GH deficiency: a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2006;16(2):132‐142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chihara  K, Kato  Y, Kohno  H, et al.  Safety and efficacy of growth hormone (GH) during extended treatment of adult Japanese patients with GH deficiency (GHD). Growth Horm IGF Res. 2008;18(4):307‐317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Newman  CB, Frisch  KA, Rosenzweig  B, et al.  Moderate doses of hGH (0.64 mg/d) improve lipids but not cardiovascular function in GH-deficient adults with normal baseline cardiac function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(1):122‐132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Maison  P, Griffin  S, Nicoue-Beglah  M, Haddad  N, Balkau  B, Chanson  P. Impact of growth hormone (GH) treatment on cardiovascular risk factors in GH-deficient adults: a Metaanalysis of Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(5):2192‐2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of the Endocrine Society are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES