Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1990 May;424:27–39. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018053

Regeneration and recovery of cat muscle spindles after devascularization.

D Barker 1, J J Scott 1
PMCID: PMC1189799  PMID: 2144024

Abstract

1. We have assessed the sensory reinnervation and recovery of regenerated muscle spindles in extensor digitorum longus (EDL) 6, 8 and 13 weeks after the muscle, with its nerve left intact, had been devascularized. Recordings were made from the dorsal roots of the responses of single afferent fibres to ramp-and-hold stretch of the regenerated spindles whose sensory reinnervation was subsequently examined in teased, silver preparations. 2. The spindle population in four normal EDL muscles ranged from 53 to 83 (mean 69); analysis of the afferent innervation of 166 normal b1b2c spindles showed that 23% had primary endings supplied by two Ia afferents. Regenerated spindles were identified as belonging to one of four groups in which afferents establish sensory endings on intrafusal muscle fibres in groups 1-3, but not in group 4. Sensory reinnervation was complete after 6 weeks recovery and similar proportions of group 1-3 spindles occurred after each recovery period, i.e. 58% after 6 weeks, 65% after 8 weeks and 62% after 13 weeks. We estimate that about half the original spindle population was lost owing to persistent ischaemic necrosis; that 30% regenerated and acquired functional afferent connections (group 1-3 spindles); and that the total loss of spindle afferents was over 60%. 3. The conduction velocities of the regenerated spindle afferents were very similar to those of normal EDL spindle afferents. The proportions that responded normally to ramp-and-hold stretch at the end of each recovery period increased from 58% after 6 weeks to 61% after 8 and 88% after 13. Other responsive spindle afferents were either predominantly phasic or only responded to supramaximal stretch. The proportions of these decreased as recovery progressed reducing from 19% after 6 weeks to 9% after 13 weeks in the case of those giving predominantly phasic responses and from 23% after 6 weeks to 3% after 13 weeks in the case of those unresponsive to physiological stretch. 4. The mean peak and held firing rates of regenerated spindle afferents responsive to 10 mms-1 ramp-and-hold stretches were all significantly lower than normal. There was no marked trend towards higher firing rates after longer periods of recovery through, considered separately, the mean peak firing rates of the normally responding afferents did show a distinct improvement. The mean dynamic and velocity indexes were not significantly different from normal. 5. The ratio of Ia:spindle II afferents, as identified by their responses to stretch, was 1:1.22 in the control animals and 1:1.26 in the experimental series.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
27

Images in this article

30Fig. 1
on p.30

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Banks R. W., Barker D. Specificities of afferents reinnervating cat muscle spindles after nerve section. J Physiol. 1989 Jan;408:345–372. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Banks R. W., Barker D., Stacey M. J. Form and distribution of sensory terminals in cat hindlimb muscle spindles. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Nov 4;299(1096):329–364. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker D., Milburn A. Development and regeneration of mammalian muscle spindles. Sci Prog. 1984 Spring;69(273):45–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker D., Scott J. J., Stacey M. J. Reinnervation and recovery of cat muscle receptors after long-term denervation. Exp Neurol. 1986 Oct;94(1):184–202. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(86)90282-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barker D., Scott J. J., Stacey M. J. Sensory reinnervation of cat peroneus brevis muscle spindles after nerve crush. Brain Res. 1985 Apr 29;333(1):131–138. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CLEGG P. C. THE EFFECT OF ADRENERGIC BLOCKING AGENTS ON THE GUINEA-PIG UTERUS IN VITRO, AND A STUDY OF THE HISTOLOGY OF THE INTRINSIC MYOMETRIAL NERVES. J Physiol. 1963 Nov;169:73–90. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlson B. M. Regeneration of entire skeletal muscles. Fed Proc. 1986 Apr;45(5):1456–1460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Diwan F. H., Milburn A. The effects of temporary ischaemia on rat muscle spindles. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1986 Mar;92:223–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hyde D., Scott J. J. Responses of cat peroneus brevis muscle spindle afferents during recovery from nerve-crush injury. J Neurophysiol. 1983 Aug;50(2):344–357. doi: 10.1152/jn.1983.50.2.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maxwell L. C. Muscle fiber regeneration in nerve-intact and free skeletal muscle autografts in cats. Am J Physiol. 1984 Jan;246(1 Pt 1):C96–105. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1984.246.1.C96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Quick D. C., Rogers S. L. Stretch receptors in regenerated rat muscle. Neuroscience. 1983 Nov;10(3):851–859. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90222-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rogers S. L., Carlson B. M. A quantitative assessment of muscle spindle formation in reinnervated and non-reinnervated grafts of the rat extensor digitorum longus muscle. Neuroscience. 1981;6(1):87–94. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(81)90246-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rogers S. L. Muscle spindle formation and differentiation in regenerating rat muscle grafts. Dev Biol. 1982 Dec;94(2):265–283. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90347-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Scheer B. T. The significance of differences between means. An empirical study. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1986;83(3):405–408. doi: 10.1016/0300-9629(86)90123-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scott J. J. Responses of cat muscle spindle afferents after short periods of denervation and reinnervation. Brain Res. 1988 Oct 4;461(2):381–383. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90272-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES