Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1990 Jun;425:301–320. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018104

Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey.

S A Edgley 1, J A Eyre 1, R N Lemon 1, S Miller 1
PMCID: PMC1189849  PMID: 2213581

Abstract

1. The responses evoked by non-invasive electromagnetic and surface anodal electrical stimulation of the scalp (scalp stimulation) have been studied in the monkey. Conventional recording and stimulating electrodes, placed in the corticospinal pathway in the hand area of the left motor cortex, left medullary pyramid and the right spinal dorsolateral funiculus (DLF), allowed comparison of the actions of non-invasive stimuli and conventional electrical stimulation. 2. Responses to electromagnetic stimulation (with the coil tangential to the skull) were studied in four anaesthetized monkeys. In each case short-latency descending volleys were recorded in the contralateral DLF at threshold. In two animals later responses were also seen at higher stimulus intensities. Both early and late responses were of corticospinal origin since they could be completely collided by appropriately timed stimulation of the pyramidal tract. The latency of the early response in the DLF indicated that it resulted from direct activation of corticospinal neurones: its latency was the same as the latency of the antidromic action potentials evoked in the motor cortex from the recording site in the DLF. 3. Scalp stimulation, which was also investigated in three of the monkeys, evoked short-latency volleys at threshold and at higher stimulus intensities these were followed by later waves. The short-latency volleys could be collided from the pyramid and, at threshold, had latencies compatible with direct activation of corticospinal neurones. The longer latency volleys were also identified as corticospinal in origin. 4. The latency of the early volley evoked by electromagnetic stimulation remained constant with increasing stimulus intensities. In contrast, with scalp stimulation above threshold the latency of the early volleys decreased considerably, indicating remote activation of the corticospinal pathway below the level of the motor cortex. In two monkeys both collision and latency data suggest activation of the corticospinal pathway as far caudal as the medulla. 5. The majority of fast corticospinal fibres could be excited by scalp stimulation with intensities of 20% of maximum stimulator output. Electromagnetic stimulation at maximum stimulator output elicited a volley of between 70 and 90% of the size of the maximal volley evoked from the pyramidal electrodes. 6. Electromagnetic stimulation was also investigated in one awake monkey during the performance of a precision grip task. Short-latency EMG responses were evoked in hand and forearm muscles. The onsets of these responses were approximately 0.8 ms longer than the responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the pyramid.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
301

Images in this article

305Fig. 1
on p.305

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amassian V. E., Stewart M., Quirk G. J., Rosenthal J. L. Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex. Neurosurgery. 1987 Jan;20(1):74–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker A. T., Jalinous R., Freeston I. L. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106–1107. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berardelli A., Inghilleri M., Manfredi M., Zamponi A., Cecconi V., Dolce G. Cortical and cervical stimulation after hemispheric infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Jul;50(7):861–865. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.7.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyd S. G., Rothwell J. C., Cowan J. M., Webb P. J., Morley T., Asselman P., Marsden C. D. A method of monitoring function in corticospinal pathways during scoliosis surgery with a note on motor conduction velocities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 Mar;49(3):251–257. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.49.3.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calancie B., Nordin M., Wallin U., Hagbarth K. E. Motor-unit responses in human wrist flexor and extensor muscles to transcranial cortical stimuli. J Neurophysiol. 1987 Nov;58(5):1168–1185. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.58.5.1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Datta A. K., Harrison L. M., Stephens J. A. Task-dependent changes in the size of response to magnetic brain stimulation in human first dorsal interosseous muscle. J Physiol. 1989 Nov;418:13–23. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Day B. L., Dressler D., Maertens de Noordhout A., Marsden C. D., Nakashima K., Rothwell J. C., Thompson P. D. Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol. 1989 May;412:449–473. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. EDISEN A. E. Excitation and inhibition of spinal motoneurons; synaptic excitation and inhibition. Am J Physiol. 1956 Jan;184(1):223–232. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1955.184.1.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hess C. W., Mills K. R., Murray N. M. Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol. 1987 Jul;388:397–419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ingram D. A., Thompson A. J., Swash M. Central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis: evaluation of abnormalities revealed by transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Apr;51(4):487–494. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.4.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jankowska E., Padel Y., Tanaka R. The mode of activation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical stimuli. J Physiol. 1975 Aug;249(3):617–636. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Katayama Y., Tsubokawa T., Maejima S., Hirayama T., Yamamoto T. Corticospinal direct response in humans: identification of the motor cortex during intracranial surgery under general anaesthesia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Jan;51(1):50–59. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.1.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kernell D., Chien-Ping W. U. Responses of the pyramidal tract to stimulation of the baboon's motor cortex. J Physiol. 1967 Aug;191(3):653–672. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koh T. H., Eyre J. A. Maturation of corticospinal tracts assessed by electromagnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Arch Dis Child. 1988 Nov;63(11):1347–1352. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.11.1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lemon R. N., Mantel G. W., Muir R. B. Corticospinal facilitation of hand muscles during voluntary movement in the conscious monkey. J Physiol. 1986 Dec;381:497–527. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lemon R. The output map of the primate motor cortex. Trends Neurosci. 1988 Nov;11(11):501–506. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(88)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mayer E. A., Loo D. D., Snape W. J., Jr, Sachs G. The activation of calcium and calcium-activated potassium channels in mammalian colonic smooth muscle by substance P. J Physiol. 1990 Jan;420:47–71. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp017901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Merton P. A., Morton H. B. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature. 1980 May 22;285(5762):227–227. doi: 10.1038/285227a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. PATTON H. D., AMASSIAN V. E. Single and multiple-unit analysis of cortical stage of pyramidal tract activation. J Neurophysiol. 1954 Jul;17(4):345–363. doi: 10.1152/jn.1954.17.4.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. PHILLIPS C. G., PORTER R. THE PYRAMIDAL PROJECTION TO MOTONEURONES OF SOME MUSCLE GROUPS OF THE BABOON'S FORELIMB. Prog Brain Res. 1964;12:222–245. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60625-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rothwell J. C., Thompson P. D., Day B. L., Dick J. P., Kachi T., Cowan J. M., Marsden C. D. Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 1. General characteristics of EMG responses in different muscles. Brain. 1987 Oct;110(Pt 5):1173–1190. doi: 10.1093/brain/110.5.1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES