Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2025 Feb 19;16(3):e03365-24. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03365-24

Exploring the interaction between endornavirus and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: mechanisms of phytopathogenic fungal virulence and antivirus

Fan Mu 1,2,#, Jinsheng Xia 1,#, Jichun Jia 1, Daohong Jiang 2,3, Baojun Zhang 1, Yanping Fu 2,3, Jiaseng Cheng 2,3, Jiatao Xie 2,3,
Editor: B Gillian Turgeon4
PMCID: PMC11898685  PMID: 39969183

ABSTRACT

Hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses have the potential as biocontrol agents for plant fungal disease management, and exploration of the interactions between these mycoviruses and phytopathogenic fungi can provide opportunities to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of hypovirulence and antiviruses. We previously found that Sclerotinia sclerotiorum endornavirus 3 (SsEV3), belonging to the genus Betaendornavirus within the family Endornaviridae, confers hypovirulence on the phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, but the underlying mechanisms remains unclear. In this study, we found that the SsEV3-infected strain produced fewer sclerotia, failed to form infection cushions on plant hosts, exhibited increased cell vacuolation, and was more sensitive to abiotic stresses. SsEV3 infection evoked transcriptional rewiring in S. sclerotiorum, affecting genes related to virulence factors for pathogenicity and RNAi pathway for antiviruses. An unknown biological function of gene Sssnf1 was downregulated following SsEV3 infection. Deletion of Sssnf1 impaired infection cushion formation and decreased virulence of S. sclerotiorum. Five key RNAi-related genes were significantly upregulated, and deletion of Ssdcl2 contributed to SsEV3 accumulation. Additionally, we identified a hypothetical protein encoded by Sshp1 that directly interacts with the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) domain encoded by SsEV3. Although the deletion mutants of Sshp1 exhibited normal colony morphology, they showed higher SsEV3 accumulation and reduced resistance to reactive oxygen species, indicating that this gene, similar to RNAi-related genes, plays an antiviral role in response to SsEV3 infection and may represent a new antivirus factor. Therefore, examination of the interaction between endornavirus and S. sclerotiorum provides new insights into the mechanisms of antivirus and virulence in phytopathogenic fungi.

IMPORTANCE

Hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses have emerged as promising biocontrol agents, and studying their interactions with phytopathogenic fungi helps uncover mechanisms of fungal pathogenesis and antiviral defense. This study provides critical insights into the interaction between Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and its hypovirulence-associated endornavirus, SsEV3, elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying mycovirus-induced changes in fungal virulence and antivirus defense. SsEV3 infection not only impairs fungal virulence traits, including infection cushion formation and sclerotial production but also triggers host antiviral responses involving typical RNA interference pathways. New virulence factors, such as Sssnf1, and antiviral factors, such as Sshp1, were identified based on the established interaction system between S. sclerotiorum and endornavirus. These findings deepen our understanding of fungus-mycovirus interactions, highlighting the role of SsEV3 in reducing the virulence of S. sclerotiorum, and facilitating the development of mycovirus-based biological control strategies.

KEYWORDS: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, mycovirus, endornavirus, hypovirulence, RNAi, antivirus response

INTRODUCTION

Mycoviruses are ubiquitous across all major fungal taxa, with hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses offering the potential to control crop fungal diseases (1, 2). Investigating the interaction system between hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses and their hosts can elucidate the signaling pathways involved in fungal pathogenicity and antiviral defense mechanisms (3, 4). The interaction system of Cryphonectria parasitica hypovirus 1 (CHV1) and Cryphonectria parasitica has been studied at the molecular and cellular levels, focusing on the genes involved in symptom development, defense mechanisms, and viral transmission (3, 5). Additionally, interactions involving Fusarium graminearum hypovirus 1 in Fusarium graminearum (6, 7), Talaromyces marneffei partitivirus-1 in Talaromyces marneffei (8), Malassezia sympodialis mycovirus in Malassezia sympodialis (9), and Colletotrichum alienum partitivirus 1 in Colletotrichum alienum (10), have been investigated through RNA-seq analysis. Fungi employ antiviral defense mechanisms, including RNA silencing, to combat viral infections (11).

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, a ubiquitous necrotrophic plant pathogen, can infect over 700 plant species, including important crops and weeds (12, 13). The virulence factors for S. sclerotiorum are primarily focused on cell wall-degrading enzymes, secreted proteins, and acidic substances (1416). Additionally, infection cushions are crucial for the virulence of S. sclerotiorum. To date, 31 genes have been reported to regulate the formation of infection cushions, with gene knockout resulting in fewer infection cushions and decreasing virulence of S. sclerotiorum (14, 16). Several hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses with RNA or DNA genomes have been discovered in S. sclerotiorum, and their interaction systems have been established to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying biological processes. For instance, the Sclerotinia sclerotiorum debilitation-associated RNA virus confers hypovirulence in strain Ep-1PN, leading to the downregulation of 150 genes, including S. sclerotiorum integrin-like gene (SSITL) (17). Targeted silencing of SSITL significantly reduces the virulence and growth rate of S. sclerotiorum (18). Sclerotinia sclerotiorum hypovirus 2-L (SsHV2-L) infection alters the genes involved in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and trafficking, influencing the accumulation of mRNA and small RNA in S. sclerotiorum (19). Furthermore, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum hypovirulence-associated DNA virus 1 (SsHADV1) affects DNA replication, DNA damage response, ribosomal assembly, and translation of S. sclerotiorum (2022).

Endornaviruses are positive single-stranded RNA viruses with genomes ranging from 9.7 to 17.6 kb, and they have been reported to infect plants, fungi, and oomycetes (23). The family Endornaviridae includes two genera, Alphaendornavirus and Betaendornavirus, with viruses classified based on genome size, host, and the presence of unique domains. A nick structure has been identified in Alphaendornavirus, but this structure has not yet been observed in Betaendornavirus (23). Most members of the family Endornaviridae exert no notable influence on their host phenotypes. Four endornaviruses, Helicobasidium mompa endornavirus 1 (24), Sclerotinia minor endornavirus 1 (25), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum endornavirus 3 (26), and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum endornavirus 11 (27), are associated with host hypovirulence. Despite these findings, there is still a limited understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying these hypovirulence effects, and no interaction system exists to elucidate the interaction between endornaviruses and their fungal hosts. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum endornavirus 3 (SsEV3) is a primary hypovirulence factor in S. sclerotiorum strain SX276 (26). In this study, to explore the interaction between SsEV3 and S. sclerotiorum, we analyzed the biological characteristics and transcriptional responses of S. sclerotiorum to SsEV3 infection. These results suggested that the interaction between SsEV3 and S. sclerotiorum is multifaceted, involving specific changes in the expression of genes associated with virulence factors, and antiviral responses. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms of interactions between endornaviruses and S. sclerotiorum.

RESULTS

SsEV3 induces hypovirulence in S. sclerotiorum

We compared the virulence, sclerotial formation, infection cushions formation, and cellular structure of the SsEV3-infected strain SCH941A1V with the virus-free strain SCH941A1. Strain SCH941A1V exhibited significantly reduced virulence and failed to induce typical lesions on detached rapeseed or soybean leaves (Fig. 1a and b). Moreover, it did not form infection cushions on rapeseed leaves even at 36 hours post-inoculated (hpi), whereas stain SCH941A1 produced infection cushions at 12 hpi (Fig. 1c). However, strain SCH941A1V could cause lesions on wounded leaves (Fig. 1d and e), indicating that its failure to form lesions on detached leaves was likely because of its defective ability to form infection cushions. Both strains produced acidic substances, as evidenced by the color change in the pH-indicator medium at 3 days post-inoculation (dpi) (Fig. S1). However, strain SCH941A1V failed to degrade the acidic substances at the later growth stages, as the pH-indicating medium remained yellow at 10 dpi, whereas the growth of strain SCH941A1 caused the medium to shift from yellow to blue (Fig. S1).

Fig 1.

Compared with SCH941A1, SCH941A1V show reduced lesions size and lessed infection cushions on datached rapeseed leaves. Bar plots compare lesion diameters on wounded and intact leaves, highlighting SCH941A1V's reduced pathogenicity

Biological characteristics of the SsEV3-infected strain SCH941A1V. (a) Virulence assay of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum virus-free strain SCH941A1 and SsEV3-infected strain SCH941A1V on detached rapeseed and soybean leaves at 48 hpi, 20°C. (b) Lesion diameters induced by the two strains on detached rapeseed leaves (20°C, 48 hpi). (c) Formation of infection cushions by strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V on rapeseed leaves. (d) Pathogenicity of strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V on detached intact rapeseed leaves and wounded rapeseed leaves at 3 dpi, 20°C. (e) Lesion diameters induced by the two strains on detached intact rapeseed leaves and wounded rapeseed leaves (20°C, 3 dpi).

Both SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V produced sclerotia on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 7 dpi (Fig. 2a). However, strain SCH941A1V exhibited impaired sclerotial formation compared to SCH941A1. The number and weight of sclerotia produced by strain SCH941A1V were reduced by 50% and 63%, respectively, compared with those produced by strain SCH941A1 (Fig. 2b and c).

Fig 2.

Compared to strain SCH941A1, strain SCH941A1V produced fewer and lighter sclerotia, and its hyphal structure was disrupted, with an increased proportion of abnormal cells observed under the transmission electron microscope.

Sclerotial and cellular ultrastructure of virus-free and SsEV3-infected strains. (a) Sclerotia of strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V. Sclerotia from 10 PDA plates of each strain were collected and photographed together. (b) Average sclerotial number of strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V obtained from 10 PDA plates. (c) Average sclerotial weight of strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V obtained from 10 plates. (d) Cellular ultrastructure of virus-free and SsEV3-infected strains. Transmission electron microscopy images of the hyphae of strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V were taken after being cultured for 2 days on PDA. (e) The average proportion of abnormal cells in strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V. The total number of cells in the five visual fields and the number of abnormal cells were counted, and the proportion of abnormal cells was calculated.

The effect of SsEV3 on the cellular structure of S. sclerotiorum was assessed. In strain SCH941A1, the hyphal cells remained intact, exhibiting normal cell wall integrity and well-organized cellular components (Fig. 2d). In contrast, SCH941A1V cells showed damaged and blurred cell membranes, indistinct and incomplete organelles, and an increased number of vacuoles (Fig. 2d). Statistical analyses revealed that vacuolated cells constituted 28.8% of SCH941A1V cells, compared to only 2.5% in SCH941A1 cells (Fig. 2e; Fig. S2; Table S1). These results indicated that SsEV3 significantly affected the cellular structure of S. sclerotiorum.

SsEV3 infection increases sensitivity to abiotic stresses

Considering the critical role of the fungal cell walls in maintaining morphology and protecting against environmental stresses (28), we further investigated whether the alterations in cellular structure affected the sensitivity of S. sclerotiorum to abiotic stresses. Colony morphology and growth rates of strains SCH941A1V and SCH941A1 were assessed in response to different abiotic stresses, including osmotic and cell wall stressors. High concentrations of KCl (0.8 M), NaCl (0.8 M), sorbitol (1 M), and cell wall stressors (Congo Red and sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) inhibited hyphal growth in both strains, however, strain SCH941A1V was more sensitive to these stressors (Fig. 3a). The growth inhibition rate of abiotic stresses on strain SCH941A1 ranged from 38.9% to 93.8%, whereas in strain SCH941A1V these ranged from 44.7% to 100% (Fig. 3b).

Fig 3.

SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V exhibit differential hyphal growth under stress conditions, with SCH941A1V depicting reduced tolerance. Growth inhibition percentages under various treatments are quantified.

Growth assay of SsEV3-infected strain SCH941A1V under different abiotic stresses. (a) Colony morphology of virus-free and SsEV3-infected strains on various abiotic stresses. The photographs were taken after 2 days of growth at 20°C. (b) Relative inhibition of S. sclerotiorum hyphal growth in response to different abiotic stresses.

SsEV3 evokes transcriptional rewiring in S. sclerotiorum

To investigate the transcriptional responses of S. sclerotiorum to SsEV3 infection, we conducted RNA-seq analysis during vegetative growth of strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V. Over 6 GB of data were obtained from each sample, with average alignment rates of 95.2% and 96.1% to the S. sclerotiorum genome, respectively (Table S2). Both principal component analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation coefficient analyses showed strong correlations among the sequenced replicate samples, ensuring the repeatability of the sequenced data for further analysis (Fig. S3). Differential gene expression analysis identified 1,339 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upon SsEV3 infection, with 594 upregulated and 745 downregulated genes (Fig. 4a and b).

Fig 4.

Volcano plot depicts differentially expressed genes. Heatmap clusters samples by infection status. Enrichment analyses highlight metabolic and transport pathways in upregulated and downregulated genes, emphasizing distinct functional changes.

Transcriptome analysis of DEGs upon SsEV3 infection. (a) Volcano plot of the genes in the virus-free and SsEV3-infected strains. The green dots represent the downregulated genes; the red dots represent the upregulated genes; and the black dots represent genes not expressed differentially. (b) Heatmap of DEGs between virus-free and SsEV3-infected strains. (c) GO enrichment analysis of the upregulated genes. (d) GO enrichment analysis of the downregulated genes. (e) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of upregulated genes. (f) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the downregulated genes.

The DEGs were mapped to the Gene Ontology (GO) databases to determine their potential functions. GO terms analysis revealed that the upregulated genes were significantly enriched in categories “Lipid metabolic process,” “Carbohydrate metabolic process,” “Transmembrane transport,” “Extracellular region,” “Plasma Membrane,” “Membrane,” “DNA-binding transcription factor activity,” “Lyase activity,” “Transmembrane transporter activity,” and “Oxidoreductase activity” (Fig. 4c). Fifteen GO terms were significantly enriched among the 745 downregulated genes, with multiple GO terms related to material transport, including “Amino acid transport,” “Ion transport,” “Transmembrane transport,” and “Transmembrane transporter activity.” Additionally, “Cell wall,” “Plasma membrane,” and “Membrane” were also enriched (Fig. 4d). These results suggest that SsEV3 infection may impair the substance transport in S. sclerotiorum and affect cell structure, potentially explaining the slow growth of strain SCH941A1V on PDA and its inhibition under abiotic stress conditions.

To identify the pathways significantly regulated by SsEV3 infection, the DEGs were mapped to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database. Eight KEGG pathways were significantly enriched among the 594 upregulated genes (Fig. 4e). The top five enriched pathways were “Transporters,” “Tyrosine metabolism,” “ABC transporters,” “Cytochrome P450,” and “Steroid biosynthesis.” The enrichment of the “Transporters” and “ABC transporters” pathways was consistent with the GO term results, suggesting that SsEV3 infection might enhance carbohydrate acquisition in strain SCH941A1V. Nineteen KEGG pathways were significantly enriched among the 745 downregulated genes. Pathways related to energy metabolism, including “Pentose and glucuronate interconversions,” “Starch and sucrose metabolism,” and “Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis” were significantly downregulated (Fig. 4f). These results demonstrated that SsEV3 infection may affect energy metabolism in S. sclerotiorum.

SsEV3 downregulates genes related to virulence factors of S. sclerotiorum

A total of 44 homologous genes related to infection structures in S. sclerotiorum and Magnaporthe oryzae were identified (Fig. S4). Of these genes, 24 were downregulated following SsEV3 infection (Fig. 5a), potentially associated with abnormal infection cushion formation in strain SCH941A1V. For instance, sscle_08g062920 (Ssmas3), a homolog of Momas3 related to virulence in M. oryzae (29), was downregulated by more than twofold in strain SCH941A1V. Among the seven previously identified genes encoding plant cell wall-degrading enzymes in S. sclerotiorum (14), five genes were downregulated in strain SCH941A1V, except for sscle_09g070580 (SsPG3) and sscle_12g088720 (SsPG6) (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, a total of 437 carbohydrate-active enZYmes (CAZymes) were predicted in genome of S. sclerotiorum, of which 126 were differentially expressed after SsEV3 infection, with downregulated genes accounting for 69% (87 downregulated and 39 upregulated genes) (Fig. S5a). Nine secretory proteins were previously reported to be related to the virulence in S. sclerotiorum (Fig. 5c). Apart from SsCVNH, eight secretory protein-related genes (SsPINE1, Ssv263, SsPG1, SsRhs1, SsSSVP1, Sscaf1, SsCP1, and SSITL) were downregulated in strain SCH941A1V (Fig. 5c). Additionally, the expression of the 486 genes related to secreted proteins identified in the S. sclerotiorum genome has been analyzed (30). In total, 126 genes were differentially expressed, with downregulated genes accounting for 76% (96 downregulated and 30 upregulated genes) (Fig. S5b). These results demonstrate that SsEV3 influences the pathogenicity of S. sclerotiorum by downregulating the expression of virulence factors, including genes related to infection cushion formation, cell wall-degrading enzymes, and secretory proteins.

Fig 5.

Heatmaps display expression patterns of selected genes across SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V, highlighting differences inreported infection cushions-,cell wall-degrading enzymes- and secretory protein-related genes.

Expression of virulence factor-related genes in strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V. (a) Expression of infection cushions associated genes. (b) Expression of the reported cell wall-degrading enzymes-related genes. (c) Expression of the reported secretory protein genes.

To investigate the interaction between SsEV3 and S. sclerotiorum, a yeast two-hybrid assay was employed to identify S. sclerotiorum genes interacting with SsEV3. The results revealed that the protein encoded by sscle_01g011030 directly interacts with the methyltransferase (Mtr) domain of SsEV3 (Fig. 6a). Furthermore, this gene was found to be associated with the formation of infection cushions. The full-length sequence of the sscle_01g011030 gene is 1,841 bp and contains an open reading frame (ORF) with two exons. This ORF encodes a protein of 597 amino acids that harbors a conserved sucrose non-fermentable 5 (SNF5) motif (Fig. S6a). Based on these findings, the gene was designated as Sssnf1. The gene was slightly downregulated in the SsEV3-infected strain SCH941A1V. A deletion mutant was generated to explore its biological functions in S. sclerotiorum (Fig. S7a). The ∆Sssnf1 deletion strain exhibited abnormal colony morphology with a significantly lower growth rate (Fig. 6b and c). Pathogenicity assays on detached rapeseed leaves showed that the lesions caused by the ∆Sssnf1 deletion strain were markedly smaller compared to strain SCH941A1 (Fig. 6b and d). Additionally, infection cushion formation was significantly impaired in ∆Sssnf1 deletion strain (Fig. 6e). Besides, to assess the effect of Sssnf1 on SsEV3 accumulation, SsEV3 was horizontally transferred into ∆Sssnf1 deletion mutant through mycelium fusion and confirmed by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) (Fig. S8a and b). Both deletion mutant and SsEV3-carrying deletion mutant ∆Sssnf1V strain could produce acid substances (Fig. S9), but compared to strain SCH941A1V, SsEV3-infected strain ∆Sssnf1V showed a slower growth rate and more deformed colony morphology (Fig. S8d through f). Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed that compared with SCH941A1V, SsEV3 accumulation in ∆Sssnf1V is 1.51 to 2.11 times higher (Fig. S8c), indicating enhanced SsEV3 replication in the absence of Sssnf1 in S. sclerotiorum. Therefore, Sssnf1 might play critical roles in vegetative growth, infection cushion formation, pathogenicity, and antivirus of S. sclerotiorum.

Fig 6.

Yeast two-hybrid assay confirms interaction. ΔSsnf1 mutant depicts reduced growth, smaller lesions, and slower rates compared with SCH941A1. Microscopy reveals infection cushions at 12 and 48 h post-inoculation. Bar plots quantify growth and lesion sizes.

Biological characteristics of the ∆Sssnf1 deletion mutant. (a) Yeast two-hybrid assay to determine the interaction between Sssnf1 and the Mtr domain of SsEV3. pGADT7-T and pGBKT7-53 were used as positive controls, whereas AD-Sssnf1 and pGBKT7 were used as negative controls. DDO: SD/-Leu/-Trp medium, QDO/+X-α-gal/+ABA: SD/-Ade/-His/-Leu/-Trp medium containing 200 ng/mL ABA and 40 µg/mL X-α-gal. (b) Colony morphology and pathogenicity of ∆Sssnf1 deletion strain and SCH941A1. Colony morphology was photographed at 2 dpi on PDA. The pathogenicity on detached rapeseed leaves was evaluated and images were taken at 48 hpi. (c) Growth rate of strains ∆Sssnf1 and SCH941A1 at 20°C. (d) Lesion diameters induced by the two strains on detached rapeseed leaves (20°C, 48 hpi). (e) Development of infection cushions. The mycelial plugs were inoculated on a glass slide and observed through an electron microscope at 12 hpi. The glass slide was photographed at 48 hpi.

SsEV3 infection triggers antivirus response involved in RNA silencing

Typical RNA-silencing-related genes (Ssdcl1, Ssdcl2, SsRdRp1, SsRdRp3, and Ssago1) in S. sclerotiorum were significantly upregulated following SsEV3 infection (Fig. 7a). To further explore the interaction between SsEV3 and RNAi-related genes, Ssdcl2 was deleted in S. sclerotiorum through a split-marker approach and confirmed by serial PCR (Fig. S7b), and the resulting strain was named ∆Ssdcl2 deletion. A SsEV3-infected strain, ∆Ssdcl2V, was created by dual-culturing of the ∆Ssdcl2 deletion strain with the SsEV3-infected strain SCH941A1V (Fig. 7b). RT-PCR confirmed the successful infection of SsEV3 in ∆Ssdcl2V (Fig. 7c). The ∆Ssdcl2 deletion strain showed the similar growth and morphology to strain SCH941A1, while SsEV3-infected strain ∆Ssdcl2V exhibited a significantly reduced growth rate compared to SCH941A1V (Fig. 7d). qRT-PCR analysis suggested that SsEV3 accumulation was 3.1-fold higher in ∆Ssdcl2V than in strain SCH941A1V (Fig. 7e), and siRNA derived from SsEV3 was significantly reduced in ∆Ssdcl2V (Fig. S7d) suggesting that Ssdcl2 may play a direct antiviral role in response to SsEV3 infection.

Fig 7.

Heatmap depicts differential expression of RNAi-related genes. ΔSsdcl2 plots altered virus transmission, reduced growth under SsEV3 infection, and increased SsEV3 expression. PCR confirms gene deletion. Bar plot depicts relative SsEV3 expression levels.

Expression of genes related to RNA silencing in S. sclerotiorum and the function of Ssdcl2 upon SsEV3 infection. (a) Expression of RNA silencing associated genes in strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V. (b) Dual-culture of ΔSsdcl2 and SCH941A1V. Strain SCH941A1V on the right of plates served as the donor strain, ΔSsdcl2 was labeled with the hygromycin B resistance gene and served as the recipient strain, and SCH941A1 served as the recipient strain as control. The photos were taken for 3 days of co-culturing. (c) RT-PCR confirmation of SsEV3 in strain ΔSsdcl2V and SCH941A1V. (d) Colony morphology of ΔSsdcl2, SCH941A1, ΔSsdcl2V, and SCH941A1V. The photos were taken after 3 days of incubation on PDA. (e) Relative expression of a gene from SsEV3 in strains ΔSsdcl2V and SCH941A1V using qRT-PCR.

S. sclerotiorum protein directly interacts with SsEV3 to contribute to antiviral responses

The yeast two-hybrid results demonstrated that the protein encoded by sscle_03g029490 directly interacts with the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) domain of SsEV3 (Fig. 8a). The full-length sequence of sscle_03g029490 gene is 454 bp and comprises an ORF with two exons, encoding a hypothetical protein of 67 amino acids (Fig. S6b). Orthologous genes were found to be widely distributed among ascomycetes, all encoding hypothetical proteins with unknown functions (Fig. S6b). Based on these features, the gene was designated as Sshp1. Sshp1 was upregulated upon SsEV3 infection. Three deletion mutants of Sshp1 were obtained using a split-marker approach and confirmed by serial PCR (Fig. S7c). The deletion mutants showed no difference in growth rate, colony morphology, or acid accumulation compared to strain SCH941A1 (Fig. 8b and c; Fig. S10). However, the lesion diameters on the detached rapeseed leaves of the deletion mutants were significantly reduced, and infection cushion formation was impaired at 12 hpi (Fig. 8b and d).

Fig 8.

Yeast two-hybrid assay confirms interaction with Sshp1. ΔSshp1 mutants depict reduced growth, smaller lesions, and altered virus transmission. PCR confirms mutations. Bar plots depict growth rates, lesion sizes, and increased SsEV3 expression in mutants.

Biological characteristics of the ∆Sshp1 deletion mutants. (a) Yeast two-hybrid assays were used to determine the interaction between Sshp1 and the RdRp-domain of SsEV3. pGADT7-T and pGBKT7-53 were used as positive controls, while AD-Sshp1 and pGBKT7 were used as negative controls. DDO: SD/-Leu/-Trp medium, QDO/+X-α-gal/+ABA: SD/-Ade/-His/-Leu/-Trp medium containing 200 ng/mL ABA and 40 µg/mL X-α-gal. (b) Colony morphology, pathogenicity, and infection cushions of ∆Sshp1 deletion mutants and SCH941A1. Photographs of colony morphology were taken after 3 days of incubation on PDA. The hyphal agar plugs were placed on glass slides, and the infection cushions were observed through an electron microscope at 12 hpi, the bar represents 50 µm. Photographs depicting pathogenicity and corresponding data were collected at 48 hpi on detached rapeseed leaves. (c) Growth rate of ∆Sshp1 deletion mutants and SCH941A1 at 20°C. (d) Lesion diameters induced by the deletion mutants and SCH941A1 on detached rapeseed leaves (20°C, 48 hpi). (e) Dual-cultured of ∆Sshp1 deletion mutants and SCH941A1V on PDA. The photos were photographed after 3 days of co-culturing. (f) RT-PCR confirmation of the presence of SsEV3 in strain ∆Sshp1V and SCH941A1V. (g) Colony morphology of virus-free strains, and SsEV3-infected ∆Sshp1V and SCH941A1V. The photos were taken after 3 days of incubation on PDA. (h) Relative expression of a gene from SsEV3 in ∆Sshp1 deletion mutants infected by SsEV3 using qRT-PCR.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a crucial role in plant defense against pathogen invasion (31). To evaluate the role of the gene Sshp1 in the resistance of S. sclerotiorum to oxidative stress triggered by plant ROS bursts, all transformants were inoculated onto PDA supplemented with varying concentrations of HO. The ∆Sshp1 deletion strain exhibited increased sensitivity to exogenous H2O2, with a greater inhibition of growth rate than strain SCH941A1 on PDA containing 20 mM H2O2 (Fig. S11). To assess the effects of Sshp1 on SsEV3 accumulation, SsEV3 was successfully transferred into the deletion mutants via hyphal fusion and confirmed through RT-PCR (Fig. 8e and f). This new SsEV3-infected strain, ∆Sshp1V, exhibited slower growth with more deformed colony morphology (Fig. 8g), compared to strain SCH941A1V. qRT-PCR analysis revealed that SsEV3 accumulation was 3.0- to 3.9-fold higher in ∆Sshp1V compared to SCH941A1V, indicating enhanced SsEV3 replication in the absence of Sshp1 (Fig. 8h). Additionally, the expression levels of Ssdcl1, Ssdcl2, Ssago1, and Ssago2 were determined using qRT-PCR to understand the molecular mechanisms of the increased SsEV3 accumulation. We found that the Ssdcl1, Ssdcl2, Ssago1, and Ssago2 were downregulated in ∆Sshp1V (Fig. S12). These findings suggest that Sshp1 plays a significant role in response to SsEV3 infection and could be related to typical RNAi processes in S. sclerotiorum.

DISCUSSION

The interaction between mycoviruses and their fungal hosts provides a valuable system for studying fungal pathogenicity and antiviral mechanisms, as demonstrated by the C. parasitica and hypovirus interactions (3). Although significant progress has been made in understanding the interactions between CHV1 and C. parasitica (3, 32), research on the interactions between mycoviruses and S. sclerotiorum is limited, and endornavirus and fungi interaction systems have not been established so far. In this study, we explored the interaction between the hypovirulence-related endornavirus SsEV3 and S. sclerotiorum. Our findings demonstrate that SsEV3 infection upregulates RNAi-related genes and downregulates genes associated with virulence factors. Notably, we identified two SsEV3-regulated genes with novel biological functions in infection cushion formation and antiviral response in S. sclerotiorum.

SsEV3 infection downregulates genes related to virulence factors in S. sclerotiorum, including a gene that encodes a protein that directly interacts with SsEV3 and affects infection cushion formation. Hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses often reduce the virulence of phytopathogenic fungi by suppressing the expression of virulence-related genes. In S. sclerotiorum and Bipolaris maydiss, virulence-associated genes, and cell-wall degradative enzyme-related genes are downregulated following infection with SsHADV1 and Bipolaris maydis partitivirus 36 (21, 22, 33, 34). Similarly, Botrytis cinerea hypovirus 1 causes hypovirulence by suppressing infection cushion formation in Botrytis cinerea (35), a phenomenon also observed in Rhizoctonia solani and Beauveria bassiana following viral infections (36, 37). In the present study, SsEV3 infection resulted in virulence debilitation and impaired infection cushions formation in the strain SCH941A1V, which corresponded to the downregulation of genes related to virulence factors, including infection structures, cell-wall degradative enzymes, and secretory proteins. This suggested that SsEV3 weakened the virulence of S. sclerotiorum by affecting the expression of these genes. Additionally, we found that gene Sssnf1 interacts with the Mtr domain of SsEV3, and the gene plays a vital role in infection cushion formation and pathogenicity. Our results provide new insights into the pathogenesis of S. sclerotiorum, highlighting how the investigation of unique phenotypes caused by hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses helps elucidate fungal pathogenesis.

SsEV3 infection triggered the RNAi antiviral processes in S. sclerotiorum. In C. parasitica, key RNAi-related genes, including dcl2 and ago2, are upregulated in response to CHV1 infection and play key roles in its antiviral response (11, 38). Recent research demonstrates the presence of a Dicer-alone antiviral defense mechanism against RNA viruses in C. parasitica, with different RNA viruses exhibiting varying degrees of susceptibility to this defense mechanism (32). Similarly, in S. sclerotiorum, dcl1 and dcl2 are essential for interactions with SsHV2-L and SsHADV1 (39), and ago2 has been implicated in the defense against SsHV2-L (40). Our study showed the upregulation of five RNAi pathway genes upon SsEV3 infection, which is consistent with findings in C. parasitica (41). Deletion strain ∆Ssdcl2V showed abnormal colony morphology with a marked reduction in growth rate compared with strain SCH941A1V and with a significantly higher accumulation of SsEV3 and a reduced siRNA derived from SsEV3. Therefore, SsEV3 infection can trigger an RNAi antiviral response in S. sclerotiorum, further validating that the RNAi antiviral pathway is a conserved mechanism in fungi, regardless of the type of mycovirus.

Sshp1 encodes a hypothetical protein that plays an important role in defense against SsEV3 infection. RNAi is recognized as a significant antiviral mechanism; however, its transcriptional regulatory mechanisms remain largely unclear. In C. parasitica, the Spt–Ada–Gcn5 acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex regulates the expression of dcl2 and induces the expression of a subset of genes. Here, dcl2 has dual functions: it acts as an antiviral agent by processing virus-derived dsRNA into siRNAs and participates in transcriptional induction mediated through the SAGA complex (42, 43). CpGap1 has been identified as an antiviral factor in response to CHV1 infection (44). Additionally, genes that influence viral replication or accumulation have been identified in other fungi. For instance, CfSnc1 and CfKOB1 affect RNA accumulation of Colletotrichum alienum partitivirus 1 in Colletotrichum fructicola (45, 46), whereas HEX1 and FgHal2 are essential for RNA accumulation of Fusarium graminearum virus 1 in Fusarium graminearum (47, 48). However, the direct interactions between fungal genes and mycoviruses have not yet been reported. In this study, Sshp1 was found to interact directly with the RdRp domain of SsEV3. The accumulation of SsEV3 was significantly elevated in the Sshp1 deletion mutants. These results suggest that Sshp1 is involved in viral RNA replication and has a crucial antiviral role in S. sclerotiorum. Furthermore, the expression of dcl2 was downregulated in the deletion mutants (Fig. S12), indicating that the deletion of Sshp1 inhibited Ssdcl2 expression. This phenomenon resembles the regulation of dcl2 by the SAGA complex in C. parasitica. However, whether Sshp1 regulates the expression of Ssdcl2 in a manner similar to the SAGA complex requires further investigation.

In conclusion, this study established a model to investigate the interaction between SsEV3 and S. sclerotiorum, serving as an example of an endornavirus-fungus interaction system. These findings highlight the multifarious effects of SsEV3 on S. sclerotiorum and provide new insights into the interactions between endornaviruses and their fungal hosts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fungal strains and culture conditions

S. sclerotiorum strain SCH941A1V, infected by SsEV3, exhibits typical hypovirulent phenotypes (26), while the mycovirus-free strain SCH941A1 shows strong virulent traits. All strains were cultured on PDA at 20°C and maintained on PDA slants at 4°C.

Phenotypic measurement of S. sclerotiorum strains

Colony morphology and virulence assay

Colony morphology and virulence assays of S. sclerotiorum strains were conducted as previously described (49). Organic acid production was measured based on the color change of pH-indicator solid media, that is, PDA supplemented with 50 mg/L bromophenol blue. The medium turns yellow as the pH decreases below 3.0, and the intensity of this color change indicates the level of organic acid accumulation; conversely, when the pH increases above 4.6, the PDA turns blue (50). Based on pH change profiles, the growth of S. sclerotiorum can be divided into two stages: the first stage is associated with a decrease in pH, while the second stage is associated with an increase in pH (51). Mycelial plugs (6 mm in diameter) were placed on PDA containing bromophenol blue (15 mL per plate). Images were taken on 3, 10, and 20 days after inoculation. Each strain was tested with a minimum of three replicates. Significant differences were analyzed using the least significant difference test, with a P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Microscopic observations of the infection cushion

Mycelial agar plugs, 6 mm in diameter, from the edge of the colony were inoculated onto detached rapeseed leaves or glass slides. These leaves or glass slides were then placed in an incubator with 100% relative humidity at 20°C. Samples were collected at 12, 20, and 36 hpi and stained with 0.05% trypan blue (20% lactic acid, 20% phenol, 40% glycerol, and 20% ddH2O). The samples were then decolorized using a solution of 25% acetic acid and 75% ethanol. Formation of the infection cushion was observed under an electron microscope (ECLIPSE Ci-S, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and images were captured. Each experiment was replicated at least three times.

Sclerotial morphology observation

To observe and assess the sclerotia produced by S. sclerotiorum strains, mycelial agar plugs (6 mm in diameter) from the edge of the colony were cultured on PDA (15 mL per plate) at 20°C for 30 days. The sclerotia were collected and dried, and their weights and numbers per plate were recorded. Each strain was cultured for 10 PDA plates.

Abiotic stress sensitivity assay

To assess the sensitivity of S. sclerotiorum to abiotic stresses, including salts, sugar alcohols, sugar, and cell wall stressors (Congo Red and SDS), mycelial agar plugs (6 mm in diameter) were cultured on PDA supplemented separately with 0.5 M salts (CaCl2 and MgCl2), 0.8 M salts (NaCl and KCl), 1 M sugar alcohol (sorbitol and mannitol), 1 M sucrose, or cell wall stressors (0.5 mg/mL Congo Red and 0.01% SDS). The colony morphology was observed and photographed at 36 hpi. The growth inhibition rate (GIR) of a substance was calculated using the formula: GIR = (AB)/A × 100%, where A represents the growth rate of S. sclerotiorum on the PDA in the absence of stressors and B represents the growth rate of S. sclerotiorum on the PDA containing the respective substances.

Transmission electron microscopy observation of hyphae

The mycelia of strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V were collected after growth on PDA at 20°C for 2–3 days and cut into small pieces (1 × 1 × 2 mm). The samples were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde at 4°C for more than 6 h and sectioned according to a previously reported method (52). The ultra-structure of the hyphal cells was then observed under a 200 kV electron microscope (Talos L120C, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Sample collection and total RNA extraction

Strains SCH941A1 and SCH941A1V were cultured on cellophane membranes overlaying PDA for 3 days. Approximately 1 g of mycelia per strain was collected and subjected to total RNA extraction using a TRIzol RNA extraction kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was treated with DNase I (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) to remove contaminating genomic DNA. RNA quality was assessed by measuring the A260/A280 ratio using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and presence was confirmed using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

RNA sequencing and analysis

Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 (Novogene, Tianjin, China). Low-quality reads, such as those containing adapters and those with a high content of unknown bases (N) were filtered to obtain clean reads (BioProject ID: PRJNA1135930). These clean reads were mapped to the genome of S. sclerotiorum using HISAT2 (53), and aligned reads were extracted using SAMtools (v1.9) (54). StringTie (v1.3.4) (55) was employed to assemble the GTF file for each sample, followed by the extraction of gene expression in ballgown format. Fragments per kilobase of exon per million and transcripts per kilobase of exon model per million were calculated for all genes in each sample. Differential gene expression was analyzed using the DESeq2 package in R-Studio (56). DEGs were identified based on absolute values of log 2-fold change (log FC) >1 and P-value adjusted (P-adjusted) false discovery rate <0.05.

Functional annotation of genes was conducted using Blast2GO (57) and the KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/, accessed on 3 December 2021). GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed using the TBtools software (58). Additionally, the Pearson correlation coefficient, PCA, and volcano plots were generated for the expression data using R-studio.

S. sclerotiorum genes knockout

The split-marker approach, as previously described, was used to generate gene knockout strains (59). The strategies for disrupting sscle_01g011030 and sscle_03g029490 are illustrated in Fig. S13, and the primers used to construct the plasmids are listed in Table S3. The upstream and downstream flanking sequences were amplified with primers 03g-5'F/HYR or 01g-5'F/HYR and YGF/03g-3'R or YGF/01g-3'R, respectively. Purified flanking sequences were concurrently transformed into protoplasts of strain SCH941A1 as described by Rollins (60). The hygromycin-resistant transformants were transferred onto fresh PDA containing 100 µg/mL hygromycin B. After three serial transfers, DNA was extracted from these strains and used as a template for PCR amplification. The primers TtrpCF/01g-3'DR and 01g-5'UF/PtrpCR were used to screen sscle_01g011030 gene knockout strains. Primers TtrpCF/03g-3'DR and 03g-5'UF/PtrpCR were used to screen sscle_03g029490 gene knockout strains (Table S3). Transformants were purified by the combination of hyphal tip isolation and protoplast generation, followed by selection using hygromycin (100 µg/mL).

Horizontal transmission of SsEV3 and quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Dual-culture experiments were conducted to transfer SsEV3 to gene knockout strains. Strain SCH941A1V served as the donor strain, while gene deletion mutants ∆Ssdcl2, ∆Sssnf1, ∆Sshp1-1, ∆Sshp1-3, and ∆Sshp1-4 labeled with the hygromycin B resistance gene were recipient strains. The recipient and donor strains were dual-cultured on PDA (9 cm) for 5 days at 20°C, and then mycelial agar discs were obtained from the colony edge of the recipient strains and transferred to new PDA supplemented with hygromycin B for further observation. After three serial transfers, total RNA was extracted as previously described, and RT-PCR was performed to detect the presence of SsEV3. The genomic DNA was then eliminated and first-strand cDNAs were synthesized using the PrimeScript FAST RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. qRT-PCR was performed on a CFX Duet Real-time PCR System (Bio-Rad) using TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The S. sclerotiorum actin gene (sscle_14g099090) was used as the internal reference, and the relative expression levels of the target genes were determined using the 2−∆∆Ct method. qRT-PCR assays were repeated at least twice, each with three biological replicates. The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S3.

Yeast two-hybrid system

The yeast two-hybrid system was used to screen for genes that interact with SsEV3 in S. sclerotiorum. The proteins encoded by the SsEV3 conserved domain, including RdRp (11,427–12,554 nt), Hel (6,129–6,968 nt), and Mtr (1,131–2,204 nt), were cloned into the pGBKT7 vector and transferred to the yeast Y2H Gold strain for self-activation and toxicity verification of the bait protein genes (Fig. S14). The successful expression of RdRp and Mtr from SsEV3 into proteins in yeast cells was demonstrated by western blot analysis using MYC as an antibody (Fig. S15). Then, these proteins from SsEV3 were used as bait proteins and co-incubated with the yeast cDNA library derived from S. sclerotiorum, and the proteins of the primary screening interaction were obtained. The genes Sssnf1 and Sshp1 obtained from the primary screening were cloned into the pGADT7 vector (Fig. S16), and the yeast Y2H Gold strain was co-transformed with the pGBKT7 plasmid (BD-RdRp, BD-Hel, and BD-Mtr) (Fig. S16) and the pGADT7 plasmid to verify the interaction between the proteins (61). At the same time, the proteins encoded by the SsEV3 conserved domain used as prey protein, and the genes Sssnf1 and Sshp1 were cloned to the pGBKT7 plasmid were co-transformed to the yeast Y2H Gold strain.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Prof. Tom Hsiang from the University of Guelph for suggestions and proofreading of the manuscript and to Du Anna and Zhang Pei of the Institutional Center for Shared Technologies and Facilities of Wuhan Institute of Virology for their technical support in transmission electron microscopy.

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32202268 and 32372620), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (202103021223127), the Excellent Doctoral Award of Shanxi Province for Scientific Research Project (SXBYKY2022051), the Shanxi Agricultural University Talent Introduction and Research Initiation Project (2022BQ12), the open funds of the National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology (AMLKF202405), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2021ZKPY005), and the Earmarked Fund for CARS-12.

F.M. and J.X. performed the experiments; J.X. and D.J. designed the research; J.J. performed the data analysis; F.M. and J.X. drafted the manuscript; J.X., Y.F., J.C., and B.Z. revised the manuscript; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Jiatao Xie, Email: jiataoxie@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

B. Gillian Turgeon, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The clean sequence reads from the transcriptomic library are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1135930.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03365-24.

Supplemental figures, part 1. mbio.03365-24-s0001.pdf.

Fig. S1 to S8.

mbio.03365-24-s0001.pdf (18.2MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03365-24.SuF1
Supplemental figures, part 2. mbio.03365-24-s0002.pdf.

Fig. S9 to S16.

mbio.03365-24-s0002.pdf (10.7MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03365-24.SuF2
Supplemental tables. mbio.03365-24-s0003.pdf.

Tables S1 to S3.

mbio.03365-24-s0003.pdf (122.4KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03365-24.SuF3

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Myers JM, James TY. 2022. Mycoviruses. Curr Biol 32:R150–R155. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Xie J, Jiang D. 2024. Understanding the diversity, evolution, ecology, and applications of mycoviruses. Annu Rev Microbiol 78:595–620. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-041522-105358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sato Y, Suzuki N. 2023. Continued mycovirus discovery expanding our understanding of virus lifestyles, symptom expression, and host defense. Curr Opin Microbiol 75:102337. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pedersen C, Marzano S-YL. 2023. Mechanisms of primed defense: plant immunity induced by endophytic colonization of a mycovirus-induced hypovirulent fungal pathogen. MPMI 36:726–736. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-23-0083-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Nuss DL. 2005. Hypovirulence: mycoviruses at the fungal-plant interface. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:632–642. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cho WK, Yu J, Lee K-M, Son M, Min K, Lee Y-W, Kim K-H. 2012. Genome-wide expression profiling shows transcriptional reprogramming in Fusarium graminearum by Fusarium graminearum virus 1-DK21 infection. BMC Genomics 13:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Yu J, Kim KH. 2021. A phenome-wide association atudy of the effects of Fusarium graminearum transcription factors on Fusarium graminearum virus 1 infection. Front Microbiol 12:622261. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.622261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lau SKP, Lo GCS, Chow FWN, Fan RYY, Cai JJ, Yuen KY, Woo PCY. 2018. Novel partitivirus enhances virulence of and causes aberrant gene expression in Talaromyces marneffei. MBio 9:e00947-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00947-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Applen Clancey S, Ruchti F, LeibundGut-Landmann S, Heitman J, Ianiri G. 2020. A novel mycovirus evokes transcriptional rewiring in the fungus Malassezia and stimulates beta interferon production in macrophages. mBio 11:e01534-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01534-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhu JZ, Qiu ZL, Gao BD, Li XG, Zhong J. 2024. A novel partitivirus conferring hypovirulence by affecting vesicle transport in the fungus Colletotrichum mBio 15:e02530-23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02530-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Segers GC, Zhang X, Deng F, Sun Q, Nuss DL. 2007. Evidence that RNA silencing functions as an antiviral defense mechanism in fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:12902–12906. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702500104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bolton MD, Thomma BPHJ, Nelson BD. 2006. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary: biology and molecular traits of a cosmopolitan pathogen. Mol Plant Pathol 7:1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00316.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Farr DF, Rossman AY. 2021. Fungal databases. U.S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Xu L, Li G, Jiang D, Chen W. 2018. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: an evaluation of virulence theories. Annu Rev Phytopathol 56:311–338. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-050052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Liu X, Zhao H, Xie J, Fu Y, Li B, Yu X, Chen T, Lin Y, Jiang D, Cheng J. 2024. A glycosyl hydrolase 5 family protein is essential for virulence of necrotrophic fungi and can suppress plant immunity. Int J Mol Sci 25:2693. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Shang Q, Jiang D, Xie J, Cheng J, Xiao X. 2024. The schizotrophic lifestyle of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mol Plant Pathol 25:e13423. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Li H, Fu Y, Jiang D, Li G, Ghabrial SA, Yi X. 2008. Down-regulation of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum gene expression in response to infection with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum debilitation-associated RNA virus. Virus Res 135:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2008.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhu W, Wei W, Fu Y, Cheng J, Xie J, Li G, Yi X, Kang Z, Dickman MB, Jiang D. 2013. A secretory protein of necrotrophic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum that suppresses host resistance. PLoS One 8:e53901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lee Marzano S-Y, Neupane A, Domier L. 2018. Transcriptional and small RNA responses of the white mold fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum to infection by a virulence-attenuating hypovirus. Viruses 10:713. doi: 10.3390/v10120713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ding F, Cheng J, Fu Y, Chen T, Li B, Jiang D, Xie J. 2019. Early transcriptional response to DNA virus infection in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Viruses 11:278. doi: 10.3390/v11030278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Qu Z, Fu Y, Lin Y, Zhao Z, Zhang X, Cheng J, Xie J, Chen T, Li B, Jiang D. 2021. Transcriptional responses of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum to the infection by SsHADV-1. J Fungi 7:493. doi: 10.3390/jof7070493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Pedersen CJ, Marzano S-Y. 2022. Characterization of transcriptional responses to genomovirus infection of the white mold fungus, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Viruses 14:1892. doi: 10.3390/v14091892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Valverde RA, Khalifa ME, Okada R, Fukuhara T, Sabanadzovic S, ICTV Report Consortium . 2019. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Endornaviridae. J Gen Virol 100:1204–1205. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Osaki H, Nakamura H, Sasaki A, Matsumoto N, Yoshida K. 2006. An endornavirus from a hypovirulent strain of the violet root rot fungus, Helicobasidium mompa. Virus Res 118:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2005.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Yang D, Wu M, Zhang J, Chen W, Li G, Yang L. 2018. Sclerotinia minor Endornavirus 1, a novel pathogenicity debilitation-associated mycovirus with a wide spectrum of horizontal transmissibility. Viruses 10:589. doi: 10.3390/v10110589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mu F, Li B, Cheng S, Jia J, Jiang D, Fu Y, Cheng J, Lin Y, Chen T, Xie J. 2021. Nine viruses from eight lineages exhibiting new evolutionary modes that co-infect a hypovirulent phytopathogenic fungus. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009823. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Luo X, Jiang D, Xie J, Jia J, Duan J, Cheng J, Fu Y, Chen T, Yu X, Li B, Lin Y. 2022. Genome characterization and phylogenetic analysis of a novel endornavirus that infects fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Viruses 14:456. doi: 10.3390/v14030456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhang X, Wang Z, Jiang C, Xu J-R. 2021. Regulation of biotic interactions and responses to abiotic stresses by MAP kinase pathways in plant pathogenic fungi. Stress Biol 1:5. doi: 10.1007/s44154-021-00004-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Gong Z, Ning N, Li Z, Xie X, Wilson RA, Liu W. 2022. Two Magnaporthe appressoria-specific (MAS) proteins, MoMas3 and MoMas5, are required for suppressing host innate immunity and promoting biotrophic growth in rice cells. Mol Plant Pathol 23:1290–1302. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Guyon K, Balagué C, Roby D, Raffaele S. 2014. Secretome analysis reveals effector candidates associated with broad host range necrotrophy in the fungal plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. BMC Genomics 15:336. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Mittler R, Zandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Van Breusegem F. 2022. Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 23:663–679. doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00499-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sato Y, Kondo H, Suzuki N. 2024. Argonaute-independent, Dicer-dependent antiviral defense against RNA viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 121:e2322765121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322765121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhang H, Xie J, Fu Y, Cheng J, Qu Z, Zhao Z, Cheng S, Chen T, Li B, Wang Q, Liu X, Tian B, Collinge DB, Jiang D. 2020. A 2-kb mycovirus converts a pathogenic fungus into a beneficial endophyte for Brassica protection and yield enhancement. Mol Plant 13:1420–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wang Y, Li Q, Wu Y, Han S, Xiao Y, Kong L. 2024. The effects of mycovirus BmPV36 on the cell structure and transcription of Bipolaris maydis. J Fungi 10:133. doi: 10.3390/jof10020133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hao F, Ding T, Wu M, Zhang J, Yang L, Chen W, Li G. 2018. Two novel hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses in the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea: molecular characterization and suppression of infection cushion formation. Viruses 10:254. doi: 10.3390/v10050254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Li Y, Li S, Liang Z, Cai Q, Zhou T, Zhao C, Wu X. 2022. RNA-seq analysis of Rhizoctonia solani AG-4HGI strain BJ-1H infected by a new viral strain of Rhizoctonia solani Partitivirus 2 reveals a potential mechanism for hypovirulence. Phytopathology 112:1373–1385. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-21-0349-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Zhang Z, Guo W, Lu Y, Kang Q, Sui L, Liu H, Zhao Y, Zou X, Li Q. 2023. Hypovirulence-associated mycovirus epidemics cause pathogenicity degeneration of Beauveria bassiana in the field. Virol J 20:255. doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02217-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Sun Q, Choi GH, Nuss DL. 2009. A single argonaute gene is required for induction of RNA silencing antiviral defense and promotes viral RNA recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:17927–17932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907552106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mochama P, Jadhav P, Neupane A, Lee Marzano S-Y. 2018. Mycoviruses as triggers and targets of RNA silencing in white mold fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Viruses 10:214. doi: 10.3390/v10040214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Neupane A, Feng C, Mochama PK, Saleem H, Lee Marzano S-Y. 2019. Roles of argonautes and dicers on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum antiviral RNA silencing. Front Plant Sci 10:976. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Chun J, Ko YH, Kim DH. 2020. Transcriptome analysis of Cryphonectria parasitica infected with Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 (CHV1) reveals distinct genes related to fungal metabolites, virulence, antiviral RNA-silencing, and their regulation. Front Microbiol 11:1711. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Andika IB, Jamal A, Kondo H, Suzuki N. 2017. SAGA complex mediates the transcriptional up-regulation of antiviral RNA silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E3499–E3506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701196114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Andika IB, Kondo H, Suzuki N. 2019. Dicer functions transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally in a multilayer antiviral defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:2274–2281. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812407116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chun J, Ko Y-H, So K-K, Cho S-H, Kim D-H. 2022. A fungal GPI-anchored protein gene functions as a virulence and antiviral factor. Cell Rep 41:111481. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Zhu JZ, Li P, Li XG, Zhong J. 2024. The SNARE protein CfSnc1 of Colletotrichum fructicola is a key regulator in fungal pathogenicity and responses to hypovirulence-associated mycovirus infection. Postharvest Biol Technol 218:113190. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.113190 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Zhu JZ, Li P, Zhang Z, Li XG, Zhong J. 2024. The CfKOB1 gene related to cell apoptosis is required for pathogenicity and involved in mycovirus-induced hypovirulence in Colletotrichum fructicola. Int J Biol Macromol 271:132437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Son M, Lee KM, Yu J, Kang M, Park JM, Kwon SJ, Kim KH. 2013. The HEX1 gene of Fusarium graminearum is required for fungal asexual reproduction and pathogenesis and for efficient viral RNA accumulation of Fusarium graminearum virus 1. J Virol 87:10356–10367. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01026-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Yu J, Lee KM, Son M, Kim KH. 2015. Effects of the deletion and over-expression of Fusarium graminearum gene FgHal2 on host response to mycovirus Fusarium graminearum virus 1. Mol Plant Pathol 16:641–652. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Wu S, Cheng J, Fu Y, Chen T, Jiang D, Ghabrial SA, Xie J. 2017. Virus-mediated suppression of host non-self recognition facilitates horizontal transmission of heterologous viruses. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006234. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Attanayake RN, Porter L, Johnson DA, Chen W. 2012. Genetic and phenotypic diversity and random association of DNA markers of isolates of the fungal plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum from soil on a fine geographic scale. Soil Biol Biochem 55:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.06.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Billon-Grand G, Rascle C, Droux M, Rollins JA, Poussereau N. 2012. pH modulation differs during sunflower cotyledon colonization by the two closely related necrotrophic fungi Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mol Plant Pathol 13:568–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00772.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Graham L, Orenstein JM. 2007. Processing tissue and cells for transmission electron microscopy in diagnostic pathology and research. Nat Protoc 2:2439–2450. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2015. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing S. 2009. The sequence alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. 2016. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc 11:1650–1667. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, Robles M, Talón M, Dopazo J, Conesa A. 2008. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res 36:3420–3435. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, Xia R. 2020. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant 13:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Xie C, Shang Q, Mo C, Xiao Y, Wang G, Xie J, Jiang D, Xiao X. 2021. Early secretory pathway-associated proteins SsEmp24 and SsErv25 are involved in morphogenesis and pathogenicity in a filamentous phytopathogenic fungus. mBio 12:e03173-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03173-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Rollins JA. 2003. The Sclerotinia sclerotiorum pac1 gene is required for sclerotial development and virulence. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16:785–795. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.9.785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Yang G, Tang L, Gong Y, Xie J, Fu Y, Jiang D, Li G, Collinge DB, Chen W, Cheng J. 2018. A cerato-platanin protein SsCP1 targets plant PR1 and contributes to virulence of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. New Phytol 217:739–755. doi: 10.1111/nph.14842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental figures, part 1. mbio.03365-24-s0001.pdf.

Fig. S1 to S8.

mbio.03365-24-s0001.pdf (18.2MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03365-24.SuF1
Supplemental figures, part 2. mbio.03365-24-s0002.pdf.

Fig. S9 to S16.

mbio.03365-24-s0002.pdf (10.7MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03365-24.SuF2
Supplemental tables. mbio.03365-24-s0003.pdf.

Tables S1 to S3.

mbio.03365-24-s0003.pdf (122.4KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03365-24.SuF3

Data Availability Statement

The clean sequence reads from the transcriptomic library are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1135930.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES