Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1990 Aug;427:603–623. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018190

Induced neural-type differentiation in the cleavage-arrested blastomere isolated from early ascidian embryos.

H Okado 1, K Takahashi 1
PMCID: PMC1189949  PMID: 2213609

Abstract

1. Isolated blastomeres and pairs of blastomeres from 8-cell embryos of Halocynthia roretzi and Halocynthia aurantium were cleavage-arrested with cytochalasin B and cultured. Their differentiation was examined in terms of membrane excitability, immunoreactivity to an epidermis-specific monoclonal antibody (2C5), and the presence of acetylcholinesterase. 2. The blastomeres that showed epidermal-type differentiation had Ca2(+)-dependent action potentials and membrane currents, and immunoreactivity to 2C5. The blastomeres that showed neural-type differentiation had Na(+)-, Ca2(+)- and TEA-sensitive delayed K+ channels, and lacked immunoreactivity to 2C5. 3. Cleavage-arrested anterior-animal blastomeres, a4-2, when cultured in isolation from an 8-cell embryo, differentiated exclusively into epidermal-type cells. However, when cultured in contact with anterior-vegetal blastomeres, A4-1, they mostly showed neural-type differentiation (seventeen out of twenty-four cells in H. roretzi). 4. Reduction of the cytochalasin B concentration enhanced neural-type development of a4-2 blastomeres in contact with A4-1 blastomeres in H. aurantium, possibly by tightening the physical contact between the blastomeres. 5. When a cleavage-arrested and isolated a4-2 blastomere was treated with 2% pronase at 10 degrees C for 15 min at the time when sister control embryos reached the 32-cell stage, the blastomere underwent neural-type differentiation in a manner identical to that of a4-2 blastomeres contacted by A4-1 cells. 6. The period during which neural-type differentiation of a4-2 blastomeres could be induced by treatment with pronase was from the 8-cell to the 110-cell stage. At the late gastrula stage neural-type differentiation of a4-2 blastomeres was not induced by pronase. The effective period for neural-type differentiation of a4-2 blastomeres in contact with A4-1 cells was between the 64-cell stage and late gastrula stage. Competence of the a4-2 blastomere to undergo neural-type differentiation decreased during gastrula stages, while the inducing ability of the A4-1 blastomere lasted longer. 7. In a few cases the posterior-animal blastomere, b4-2, could also be induced to undergo neural-type differentiation after contact with A4-1 cells or after pronase treatment. 8. The appearance of Na+ spikes in a4-2 blastomeres in contact with A4-1 cells was considered a manifestation of neural induction, similar in principle to the induction of ectoderm by the chorda-mesoderm in higher vertebrates.

Full text

PDF
603

Images in this article

610Fig. 3
on p.610

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARTH L. G., BARTH L. J. Further investigations of the differentiation in vitro of presumptive epidermis cells of the Rana pipiens gastrula. J Morphol. 1962 May;110:347–373. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051100304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davies P., Allison A. C. Effects of cytochalasin B on endocytosis and exocytosis. Front Biol. 1978;46:143–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferruzza N., Farinella E. The influence of LiCL on animal halves isolated from ascidian eggs. Acta Embryol Morphol Exp. 1981 Aug;2(1):57–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gurdon J. B. Embryonic induction--molecular prospects. Development. 1987 Mar;99(3):285–306. doi: 10.1242/dev.99.3.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirano T., Takahashi K. Development of ionic channels and cell-surface antigens in the cleavage-arrested one-cell embryo of an ascidian. J Physiol. 1987 May;386:113–133. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hirano T., Takahashi K., Yamashita N. Determination of excitability types in blastomeres of the cleavage-arrested but differentiated embryos of an ascidian. J Physiol. 1984 Feb;347:301–325. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobson M. Cell lineage analysis of neural induction: origins of cells forming the induced nervous system. Dev Biol. 1984 Mar;102(1):122–129. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90180-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miyazaki S., Takahashi K., Tsuda K. Calcium and sodium contributions to regenerative responses in the embryonic excitable cell membrane. Science. 1972 Jun 30;176(4042):1441–1443. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4042.1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nishida H. Cell lineage analysis in ascidian embryos by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme. III. Up to the tissue restricted stage. Dev Biol. 1987 Jun;121(2):526–541. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90188-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Okado H., Takahashi K. A simple "neural induction" model with two interacting cleavage-arrested ascidian blastomeres. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6197–6201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Okado H., Takahashi K. Differentiation of membrane excitability in isolated cleavage-arrested blastomeres from early ascidian embryos. J Physiol. 1990 Aug;427:583–602. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Okamura Y., Shidara M. Kinetic differences between Na channels in the egg and in the neurally differentiated blastomere in the tunicate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(23):8702–8706. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.23.8702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ortolani G., Patricolo E., Mansueto C. Trypsin-induced cell surface changes in ascidian embryonic cells: regulation of differentiation of a tissue-specific protein. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Aug;122(1):137–147. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90568-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Perry M. M. Microfilaments in the external surface layer of the early amphibian embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1975 Feb;33(1):127–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sharpe C. R., Fritz A., De Robertis E. M., Gurdon J. B. A homeobox-containing marker of posterior neural differentiation shows the importance of predetermination in neural induction. Cell. 1987 Aug 28;50(5):749–758. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90333-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Suzuki A. S., Nakatake H., Hidaka T. Cell-to-cell contact in primary embryonic induction: effects of lectin on electrical coupling and neural induction. Differentiation. 1984;28(1):73–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1984.tb00268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tacke L., Grunz H. Close juxtaposition between inducing chordamesoderm and reacting neuroectoderm is a prerequisite for neural induction in Xenopus laevis. Cell Differ. 1988 Jun;24(1):33–43. doi: 10.1016/0045-6039(88)90084-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES