Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1990 Feb;421:583–594. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp017963

Force development and relaxation in single motor units of adult cats during a standard fatigue test.

D A Gordon 1, R M Enoka 1, G M Karst 1, D G Stuart 1
PMCID: PMC1190103  PMID: 2348404

Abstract

1. The purpose of this study was to investigate tetanic force development and relaxation in single motor units that were subjected to a standard fatigue test. 2. Motor units of tibialis posterior, a hindlimb muscle in the adult cat, were assigned to four categories (i.e. types S, FR, FI, FF) using conventional criteria. 3. Based on the first tetanus of the fatigue test, type S units took significantly longer to develop force and to relax than the fast-twitch units. Within the fast-twitch subpopulations, type FR and FI units were significantly slower to develop force and to relax than were type FF units, but there were no significant differences between type FR and FI units. 4. After 120 s of the fatigue test, the rates of force development were faster than initial values in type S and FR units, but were largely unchanged for the type FI and FF units. Most relaxation parameters were unaffected by stimulation in type S and FR units, but all parameters became significantly slower in type FI and FF units. 5. The average time courses of force development and relaxation showed that during 240 s of the fatigue test, type S units exhibited either a progressive increase in a parameter or no change at all. In contrast, fast-twitch units displayed profiles that included initial increases in a force development or relaxation parameter followed by variable amounts of decline that corresponded to fatigability. 6. It is concluded that repetitive activation affects the development and relaxation of tetanic force in all motor-unit types. Average changes in these parameters tended to parallel the conventional classification of motor units into four categories.

Full text

PDF
583

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bigland-Ritchie B. R., Dawson N. J., Johansson R. S., Lippold O. C. Reflex origin for the slowing of motoneurone firing rates in fatigue of human voluntary contractions. J Physiol. 1986 Oct;379:451–459. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bigland-Ritchie B., Johansson R., Lippold O. C., Woods J. J. Contractile speed and EMG changes during fatigue of sustained maximal voluntary contractions. J Neurophysiol. 1983 Jul;50(1):313–324. doi: 10.1152/jn.1983.50.1.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke R. E., Levine D. N., Tsairis P., Zajac F. E., 3rd Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):723–748. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calancie B., Stein R. B. Measurement of rate constants for the contractile cycle of intact mammalian muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1987 Feb;51(2):149–159. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83320-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawson M. J., Gadian D. G., Wilkie D. R. Mechanical relaxation rate and metabolism studied in fatiguing muscle by phosphorus nuclear magnetic resonance. J Physiol. 1980 Feb;299:465–484. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dietz V. Analysis of the electrical muscle activity during maximal contraction and the influence of ischaemia. J Neurol Sci. 1978 Jul;37(3):187–197. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(78)90202-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dubose L., Schelhorn T. B., Clamann H. P. Changes in contractile speed of cat motor units during activity. Muscle Nerve. 1987 Oct;10(8):744–752. doi: 10.1002/mus.880100811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards R. H., Hill D. K., Jones D. A. Metabolic changes associated with the slowing of relaxation in fatigued mouse muscle. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):287–301. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edwards R. H., Young A., Hosking G. P., Jones D. A. Human skeletal muscle function: description of tests and normal values. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1977 Mar;52(3):283–290. doi: 10.1042/cs0520283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fitts R. H., Holloszy J. O. Contractile properties of rat soleus muscle: effects of training and fatique. Am J Physiol. 1977 Sep;233(3):C86–C91. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1977.233.3.C86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garnett R., Stephens J. A. Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:463–473. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordon D. A., Enoka R. M., Stuart D. G. Motor-unit force potentiation in adult cats during a standard fatigue test. J Physiol. 1990 Feb;421:569–582. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp017962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haiech J., Derancourt J., Pechère J. F., Demaille J. G. Magnesium and calcium binding to parvalbumins: evidence for differences between parvalbumins and an explanation of their relaxing function. Biochemistry. 1979 Jun 26;18(13):2752–2758. doi: 10.1021/bi00580a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hultman E., Sjöholm H. Electromyogram, force and relaxation time during and after continuous electrical stimulation of human skeletal muscle in situ. J Physiol. 1983 Jun;339:33–40. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. JEWELL B. R., WILKIE D. R. The mechanical properties of relaxing muscle. J Physiol. 1960 Jun;152:30–47. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pagala M. K. Effect of length and caffeine on isometric tetanus relaxation of frog sartorius muscles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Jun 10;591(1):177–186. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(80)90231-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Peckham M., Woledge R. C. Labile heat and changes in rate of relaxation of frog muscles. J Physiol. 1986 May;374:123–135. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sahlin K., Edström L., Sjöholm H., Hultman E. Effects of lactic acid accumulation and ATP decrease on muscle tension and relaxation. Am J Physiol. 1981 Mar;240(3):C121–C126. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1981.240.3.C121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stephens J. A., Usherwood T. P. The mechanical properties of human motor units with special reference to their fatiguability and recruitment threshold. Brain Res. 1977 Apr 8;125(1):91–97. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90361-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES