Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2025 Mar 7;104(10):e41772. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041772

Nutritional therapy in palliative care units: A bibliometric analysis

Özlem Öner a,*, Pinar Ayvat b, Ali Necati Gökmen a
PMCID: PMC11902936  PMID: 40068025

Abstract

This bibliometric review aimed to provide a general picture and systematic mapping of research trends in palliative care (PC) and nutrition internationally. The Web of Science (WoS) database was searched on May 7, 2024, for original articles focusing on PC and nutrition between 1970 and 2023. Relevant publications were searched using the Thompson Reuters Science Citation Index (SCI) search engine with the keywords “palliative care,” “palliative care unit,” “nutrition,” and “palliative care and nutrition.” A total of 918 articles were found in 391 sources with the participation of 4772 authors. An average of 18.32 citations per article was identified. When analyzed by country, the United States of America (USA) had the highest number of publications (n = 210), followed by Germany (n = 71) and France (n = 69). In the list of the most frequently repeated keywords in the field of PC and nutrition, the most commonly used words were “palliative care” and “end.” Other common terms included “nutrition,” “quality of life,” and “hydration.” Additional frequently used words were “cancer,” “symptoms,” and “management..” This study is the first step toward analyzing and mapping research related to PC and nutrition. It shows that the number of publications related to PC and nutrition has steadily increased between 1991 and 2023. United State of America and European countries are the top publishers and receive the most citations. Hot topics in the field include “end,” “nutrition,” “quality of life,” “hydration,” “cancer,” “symptoms,” and “management,” highlighting the complexity of the subject.

Keywords: bibliometric, nutrition, palliative, therapy

1. Introduction

Palliative care (PC) units are specialized facilities aimed at improving the quality of life for patients with life-threatening illnesses, their families, and caregivers as they cope with physical, psychological, social, or spiritual challenges.[1] The need for PC has increased globally due to the burden of infectious diseases, as seen during the pandemic, as well as the rise in chronic illnesses and aging populations.[2] Moreover, PC is essential not only for adults but also for individuals of all age groups, including children with severe incurable diseases.[3] In fact, receiving PC services is a human right for those in need of such care.[4] For healthcare professionals, it is an ethical duty to provide PC services to these patients, who may have chronic illnesses or be in the final stages of life, by managing symptoms early, alleviating suffering, and respecting human dignity.[5] Each year, approximately 56.8 million people, including 25.7 million in their final year of life, require PC.[1] Unfortunately, only 14% of patients in need of PC can access these services, indicating that the global demand for PC will continue to rise.[1]

PC patients often suffer from severe symptoms that negatively affect their quality of life.[6] Among these, nutritional deficiencies are undoubtedly one of the most critical.[7] Malnutrition can impact daily activities and quality of life, increase complication rates, morbidity, and even mortality; hence, its early detection and treatment are essential.[8] Nutritional support is a crucial aspect of PC for patients with life-threatening illnesses.[9] Proper nutritional support is important not only in meeting the physical needs of the body but also in providing social, cultural, and psychological support to patients.[10] With the growing need for PC units and the significance of nutritional therapy, it raises the question of whether research and publication awareness on this topic has been established worldwide.[11]

In bibliometric analysis research, various quantitative methods are used to measure, track, and analyze the published scientific literature over extended periods.[12] This method aims to process large volumes of research published over a long period with limited resource and time investment.[13] Bibliometric analysis measures productivity (e.g. the number of published articles), impact (e.g. citation count, journal impact factor [IF]s), and collaboration between countries, institutions, and authors.[14] It helps in understanding the growth and trends in scientific research in a specific field and contributes to the development of health initiatives.[15] The Web of Science (WoS) online database, which we used for our research, is not freely accessible and contains journal articles from all major disciplines dating back to 1900, providing tools for generating representative figures.[12]

The aim of this research is to assess the current state of interest in nutrition, which we consider a significant issue in PC, as the global need for and interest in PC continues to grow. For this purpose, we intend to examine the most cited articles on PC and nutritional therapy in PC units in terms of authors, journals, countries, and recurring keywords (hotspots) using the Thompson Reuters WoS Citation Indexing (SCI) database, and to shed light on the direction of science in this field by determining citation trends.

2. Methodology

2.1. Search strategy

The Thompson Reuters SCI citation indexing database was searched on May 7, 2024, following approval from the ethics committee (Decision No: 2023/196, Approval Date: December 27, 2023). Informed consent was not required due to the design of the study. We utilized the WoS (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia) database because it includes various bibliometric indicators and literature from different disciplines.[16] In this study, the citation rates, authors, journals, countries, international collaborations, and hotspots of publications on “PC and nutrition” were evaluated. The data collection and analysis process is detailed below.

2.2. MeSH terms strategy

To determine the most cited articles at the international level, as well as citation trends and hotspots in the field of “PC and nutrition,” appropriate search terms were compiled. Relevant publications were searched using the Thompson Reuters SCI search engine with the keywords “palliative care,” “palliative care unit,” “nutrition,” and “palliative care and nutrition.”

2.3. Data collection and analysis

The search was limited to English-language publications, and original research articles were included, while other types of publications were excluded. Performance analysis, collaboration analysis, and scientific mapping were conducted on authors, citation frequency, author collaboration, and keywords to gain insights into this scientific field. The search timeframe was set between January 1, 1970, and April 31, 2023. The initial search, using the selected keywords, yielded 379,595 results. Since our aim was to investigate publications specifically related to PC, we refined the search using “Palliative Care” under Citation Topics Micro and Citation Topics Macro in the search engine, narrowing it down to 918 results. For analysis, the exported data was saved in “full records and cited references” format as plain text, tab-delimited format, and Excel outputs. Analysis was performed using Excel, the Bibliometrix R package (version 4.1.2), and an online bibliometric application (https://bibliometric.com/app) for data tabulation and visualizations.

2.4. Performance analysis

In the performance analysis, data on the growth of publications, the most active countries and institutions, the most cited journals, and the mapping of publications and keywords were analyzed to measure the main performance of the research in this field. A citation analysis was conducted at this stage. To determine the 2023 IF of each journal, the Journal Citation Reports dataset was used (https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-analytics-evaluation-and-management-solutions/journal-citation-reports). The Hirsch index (H-index) and IF were employed to demonstrate the impact of the publications. The H-index is a valuable measure for evaluating academic productivity.[17] It can be applied to assess the academic productivity of a department, university, country, scientist, or journal. The IF is a metric that demonstrates the impact of journals in their fields, calculated by examining citations of articles in scientific journals.

2.5. Collaboration analysis

To highlight the scientific collaboration between countries where the publications originated, a collaboration analysis was performed. For this analysis, bibliometrics such as self-citation practices (SCP), multiple country publications (MCP), citation frequency (Freq), and the ratio of MCP were used.

2.6. Scientific mapping

Scientific mapping is a system that represents relationships between “disciplines, fields, specialties, and individual articles or authors.” In our study, the most cited authors, scientific collaborations, and co-word analysis were conducted using the Wosviewer method. The mappings illustrating these relationships were created using Vosviewer version 1.6.15 (https://www.vosviewer.com/).

3. Results

3.1. Performance analysis

The Thomson Reuters SCI database was searched for publications written in English between January 1, 1970, and April 31, 2024, on the topics of “Palliative care” and “nutrition.” A total of 918 articles were found in 391 sources with the participation of 4772 authors. An average of 18.32 citations per article was identified. The first publication related to the selected topic was dated 1991. The most cited publication was titled “EFNS guidelines on the Clinical Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (MALS)-revised report of an EFNS task force,” which was cited 746 times and published by Andersen and colleagues in the “European Journal of Neurology” (Table 1). The top ten most cited articles are summarized in Table 1. The annual growth rate of publications on “Palliative care” and “Nutrition” was found to be 7.68% (Fig. 1). The average age of the documents was calculated as 9.04 years. The total number of citations for these articles was 16,815, with an h-index of 58.

Table 1.

The top 10 most cited articles in the field of palliative care and nutrition.

Yazarlar Title Source Year Total citations Assigned cluster First author institution Country
Andersen, Peter M.; ve arkadaşlari EFNS Guidelines on the Clinical Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (MALS) - Revised Report of an EFNS Task Force European Journal of Neurology 2012 746 Quality-of-life Umeå University Sweden
Van Der Steen, Jenny T.; et al White Paper Defining Optimal Palliative Care in Older People with Dementia: A Delphi Study and Recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care Palliative Medicine 2014 583 Palliative care Leiden University Medical Center Netherlands
Wang, Ching H.; et al Consensus Statement for Standard of Care in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Journal of Child Neurology 2007 572 Quality-of-life Stanford University School of Medicine USA
Finkel, Richard S.; et al Diagnosis and Management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Part 2: Pulmonary and Acute Care; Medications, Supplements and Immunizations; Other Organ Systems; and Ethics Neuromuscular Disorders 2018 338 Quality-of-life St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital USA
Sykes, N.; Thorns, A. The Use of Opioids and Sedatives at the End of Life Lancet Oncology 2003 255 End St. Christopher’s Hospice UK
Carli, Francesco; et al Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation on 30-Day Postoperative Complications for Frail Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Surgery 2020 229 Quality-of-life McGill University Health Centre Canada
Quill, T.E.; Byock, I.R. Responding to Intractable Terminal Suffering: The Role of Terminal Sedation and Voluntary Refusal of Food and Fluids Annals of Internal Medicine 2000 197 End University of Rochester Medical Center USA
Allard, Johane P.; et al Malnutrition at Hospital Admission - Contributors and Effect on Length of Stay: A Prospective Cohort Study from the Canadian Malnutrition Task Force Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2016 169 Quality-of-life University of Toronto Canada
Lundholm, K.; et al Palliative Nutritional Intervention in Addition to Cyclooxygenase and Erythropoietin Treatment for Patients with Malignant Disease: Effects on Survival, Metabolism, and Function - A Randomized Prospective Study Cancer 2004 163 Quality-of-life Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Sweden
Kelleher, D.K.; et al Growth and Correlates of Nutritional Status Among Infants with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome (HLHS) After Stage 1 Norwood Procedure Nutrition 2006 161 Quality-of-life Children’s Hospital Boston USA

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Increasing citation trend over the years.

The top ten authors with the most publications in the field of PC and nutrition are shown in Figure 2. The institutions that published the most articles in the field of PC and nutrition are shown in Figure 3. Furthermore, the proportion of co-authorships in articles involving international collaboration was 13.62% (Fig. 4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Most relevant authors about PC and nutrition. PC = palliative care.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Affiliations about PC and nutrition. PC = palliative care.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Corresponding author’s countries about PC and nutrition. PC = palliative care.

When classified by the number of published articles, citations, and IF, the journal with the highest number of publications was the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (n = 45, average citations = 1307). It was followed by Supportive Care in Cancer (n = 37, average citations = 906) and Clinical Nutrition (n = 16, average citations = 878; Table 2).

Table 2.

Top 10 journals with the highest number of citations and articles in the field of palliative care and nutrition.

No Source Documents Citations Impact factor
1 Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 45 1307 3.2
2 Supportive Care in Cancer 37 986 3.8
3 Clinical Nutrition 16 878 7.7
4 Palliative Medicine 26 1196 4.2
5 American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine 17 162 1.8
6 Journal of Palliative Medicine 27 404 2.4
7 BMC Palliative Care 23 239 2.0
8 International Journal of Palliative Nursing 8 84 0.9
9 BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 15 72 2.2
10 Nutrition 10 376 3.3

When analyzed based on the institutions where the articles were published, the University of Toronto had the highest number of publications (n = 50), followed by Harvard University (n = 44) and Assistance Publique Hopitaux Paris (n = 38; Table 3).

Table 3.

Collaboration analysis of countries.

Country Articles SCP MCP Freq MCP_ratio
USA 210 187 23 0.229 0.11
Germany 71 61 10 0.077 0.141
France 69 64 5 0.075 0.072
United Kingdom 69 60 9 0.075 0.13
Japan 54 50 4 0.059 0.074
China 52 45 7 0.057 0.135
Canada 44 39 5 0.048 0.114
Italy 40 36 4 0.044 0.1
Sweden 31 24 7 0.034 0.226
Australia 29 25 4 0.032 0.138
Brazil 24 22 2 0.026 0.083
Spain 21 21 0 0.023 0
Netherlands 20 12 8 0.022 0.4
Turkey 18 17 1 0.02 0.056
Switzerland 15 10 5 0.016 0.333
Belgium 14 9 5 0.015 0.357
Austria 12 9 3 0.013 0.25
India 11 10 1 0.012 0.091
Israel 10 7 3 0.011 0.3
Korea 10 8 2 0.011 0.2
Mexico 9 7 2 0.01 0.222
Poland 8 8 0 0.009 0
Norway 6 3 3 0.007 0.5
Portugal 6 5 1 0.007 0.167
Denmark 5 4 1 0.005 0.2

Freq = citation frequency, MCP = multiple country publication, SCP = self-citation practices.

When analyzed by country, the United States had the highest number of publications (n = 210), followed by Germany (n = 71) and France (n = 69). When countries were analyzed by total citations and average citations per article, the United States had the highest total citations and average citations per article (TC = 4920, AAC = 23.4), followed by Sweden (TC = 1472, AAC = 47.5) and Canada (TC = 1472, AAC = 47.5). In terms of SCP, the United States had the highest SCP count (n = 187), followed by France (n = 64) and Germany (n = 61). In contrast, regarding MCP ratio, the Netherlands had the highest ratio at 0.4%, followed by Switzerland at 0.333% and Sweden at 0.226% (Table 4).

Table 4.

Total and average citation numbers of articles published by countries.

Country TC Average article citations
USA 4920 23.40
Sweden 1472 47.50
Canada 1334 30.30
United Kingdom 1141 16.50
Netherlands 1132 56.60
Italy 1079 27.00
Japan 785 14.50
Germany 768 10.80
China 761 14.60
France 578 8.40
Switzerland 386 25.70
Australia 354 12.20
Belgium 203 14.50
Korea 202 20.20
Spain 187 8.90
Austria 171 14.20
Czech Republic 140 35.00
Israel 102 10.20
Turkey 96 5.30
Brazil 88 3.70
Denmark 81 16.20
Norway 77 12.80
Chile 76 19.00
South Africa 72 24.00
Singapore 50 10.00

TC = total citations.

3.2. Citation growth

Annual citation growth for “Palliative Care” and “Nutrition” is shown in Figure 1. Citation trends indicate steady growth from 1991, the date of the first publication, until 2021, after which there was a decline. The highest number of citations occurred in 2021, with a total of 1800 citations.

3.3. Keyword analysis

In the list of the most frequently repeated keywords in the field of PC and nutrition, the most commonly used words were “palliative care” (157 occurrences) and “end” (149 occurrences). Other common terms included “nutrition” (149 occurrences), “quality of life” (136 occurrences), and “hydration” (114 occurrences; Fig. 5). Additional frequently used words were “cancer,” “symptoms,” and “management.” Figure 6 provides a comprehensive overview of the most common research themes in both PC and nutrition, illustrating the most prevalent topics and their trends over time.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Trend topics about PC and nutrition. PC = palliative care.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

The most repeated words in the article.

3.4. Collaboration analysis

International collaboration is defined as research contributed by authors from multiple countries. This study presents the frequency of collaborations between countries in Table 2 and Table 5. The countries with international collaborations are visualized using WoSviewer (Fig. 7).

Table 5.

Collaboration of countries about PC and nutrition.

From To Frequency
Argentina El Salvador 1
Argentina New Zealand 1
Australia Netherlands 2
Australia New Zealand 1
Australia Poland 1
Australia Switzerland 1
Australia Thailand 1
Austria Estonia 1
Austria Greece 2
Austria Ireland 1
Austria Israel 2
Austria Norway 1
Austria Peru 1
Austria Portugal 1
Belgium Austria 1
Belgium Croatia 1
Belgium Czech Republic 1
Belgium Denmark 2
Belgium Finland 1
Belgium Greece 1
Belgium Ireland 3
Belgium Israel 2
Belgium Norway 2
Belgium Poland 2
Belgium Portugal 2
Belgium Switzerland 5
Brazil Argentina 1
Brazil El Salvador 1
Brazil Peru 1
Brazil Portugal 1
Canada Australia 3
Canada Belgium 2
Canada Chile 2
Canada Denmark 3
Canada Israel 1
Canada Netherlands 1
Canada Norway 3
Canada Poland 1
Canada Sweden 3
Canada Switzerland 3
Chile Colombia 1
China Australia 3
China Canada 2
China Chile 1
China Korea 2
China Singapore 1
Czech Republic Croatia 1
Czech Republic Slovakia 1
Denmark Estonia 1
Denmark Finland 1

PC = palliative care.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Country collaboration map about PC and nutrition. PC = palliative care.

3.5. Scientific mapping

The scientific map of the most cited authors and the keyword analysis was generated using the Wosviewer method.

4. Discussion

This study is a bibliometric review that systematically maps and presents a global overview of research on PC and nutrition from the first publication in 1991 until 2023. Upon conducting a bibliometric analysis of the publications, a total of 918 articles were identified in 391 sources with 4772 authors. These articles, which have been cited 16,815 times in total, have an h-index of 58. Additionally, 13.62% of the authors have demonstrated international collaboration. The citation rate per document is 18.32, and the annual growth rate of 7.68% reflects the high demand for research in PC. The average age of the documents, 9.04 years, suggests that nutrition plays an important role in PC, which is evidenced by 2079 author keywords. An analysis of the most frequently used keywords in PC identified “end,” “nutrition,” “quality of life,” and “hydration” as hot spots.

Measuring the quality of care provided to terminally ill patients is an important indicator that enables healthcare providers and policymakers to monitor and improve the care delivery process. Quality indicators can identify good care and potential problems.[18] Bibliometric review is an appropriate approach to mapping a research field and provides a comprehensive picture of the development and current status of a field over time.[19] In this study, we found that the most cited publication is titled “EFNS guidelines on the Clinical Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (MALS)—revised report of an EFNS task force” published in the European Journal of Neurology.[20] This article emphasizes that every effort should be made to preserve the autonomy of patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis throughout the course of the disease. It highlights the importance of PC and nutrition for this patient group and suggests early collaboration with patients and their caregivers, with respect for their social and cultural backgrounds and dignity, particularly through advance directives for end-of-life care. The fact that this article has received the most citations may be explained by its reflection of the core spirit of PC. The second most cited study, published by Van der Steen et al, is titled “White paper defining optimal PC in older people with dementia: a Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for PC” and appeared in Palliative Medicine.[21] This article aims to identify the PC needs of patients with dementia and their families, a disease with no curative treatment. The consensus reached includes recommendations on patient-centered care, communication, shared decision-making, symptom management, care goal setting and advance planning, continuity of care, psychosocial and spiritual support, family involvement, healthcare team training, timely recognition of death prognosis, avoiding overly aggressive, burdensome, or futile treatments in nutrition and dehydration, and the feasibility of PC. The third most cited publication is titled “Consensus Statement for Standard of Care in Spinal Muscular Atrophy” by Wang et al, which sheds light on the critical issue of PC and nutrition in children with spinal muscular atrophy who may be dependent on their families for care.[22]

Our bibliometric analysis revealed a significant increase in research on PC, particularly from the first publication in 1991 until 2021. The upward trend in publications supports previous research. There are several possible explanations for this result. It could be related to the aging world population and the growing demand for PC, or the peak in publications during the pandemic period, suggesting a connection to the increased burden of infectious diseases.[23,24] On the other hand, it may be related to countries responding to the WHO’s calls for PC policies and the official recognition of PC as a medical specialty in several countries.[25]

When articles were evaluated by country, the USA was the global leader in PC research with 210 articles and 4920 total citations. It was followed by Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. Sweden, with a lower number of articles, showed a notable collaboration effort with an MCP ratio of 0.226% and 1472 total citations. Similarly, the Netherlands and Switzerland stood out with high MCP ratios of 0.4% and 0.333%, respectively, indicating strong international research collaborations. In contrast, Poland and Spain showed lower MCP ratios, indicating that single-country publications were more common. The high number of articles from the USA and Europe can be attributed to the fact that many of the authors contributing to PC research work at institutions in these regions, and the study was limited to articles published in English.[26] The high productivity of PC-related publications in these countries is consistent with previous research.[14] Additionally, institutionally, the first PC unit was established in the United Kingdom about 50 years ago.[27] Similarly, the USA has a long history of PC development, with two-thirds of US hospitals offering PC services by 2010.[28] However, Brazil and Turkey showed significantly lower total citations and average citations, indicating that research from these countries had relatively lower impact. Another study found that despite an increase in the number of articles published in some countries, the citation rates remained low. For example, in India, the increase in publication volume was attributed to regulations requiring graduate students to publish in indexed journals, leading to low citation rates.[29] This requirement in India aims to promote institutional PC development.[30] It seems that countries’ institutional PC policies parallel academic indicators such as publication numbers and citation rates. According to the Turkish Ministry of Health, a total of 90,648 palliative patients were served in 437 PC Centers with a total of 6397 beds in the first 6 months of 2023.[31] While this number is significant, considering the country’s population, we believe that Turkey still has a long way to go in the field of PC.

In terms of the specific frequency of terms related to PC and nutrition and their changes over the years, between 1991 and 2023, keywords such as “palliative care,” “end,” “hydration,” and “nutrition” were found to be increasingly repeated. Additionally, “cancer,” “symptoms,” and “management” were identified as hot spots. The significant increase in hydration and fluid management publications until 2015 and their continuation until 2019 is evidence of the topic’s importance. Similarly, the notable interest in “weight loss” from 2009 to 2020 suggests that the difficulty of managing nutrition in PC has been widely acknowledged by authors. In relation to PC, sedation, total parenteral nutrition, and cachexia became recognized in the early 2010s and remained part of core research topics until 2022. Lastly, “quality of life,” “care,” and “pain” were common themes throughout all years, aligning with the findings of other studies on PC. Although PC is a comprehensive approach focused on all age groups and diseases with life-limiting conditions, most PC-related research has been found to focus on adult cancers and nutritional issues.[8] This could be due to the fact that adult cancer diseases constitute the largest group of life-limiting diseases, and their outcomes are dramatic.[32] More than one-third of hospitalized cancer patients either die or are transferred to nursing homes.[33] A survey reported that unplanned hospitalizations for patients with advanced cancer strongly predicted a median survival of <6 months.[34] Therefore, it is not surprising that PC publications are cancer-focused, as in our study. These findings are consistent with a systematic review evaluating international PC research priorities in 2020.[35] Additionally, the global dominance of cancer can explain why oncology continues to be the driving force behind the development of new PC services in many countries.[36] Nevertheless, determining patient needs and improving quality of life and comfort is the primary goal of PC, which is much more important than making accurate prognostic predictions of a patient’s survival.[37] Most patients with life-limiting illnesses develop potentially debilitating symptoms during the course of their illness.[38] Based on the hot spots and trending topics in this study, it was determined that PC and nutrition research has focused on the management of specific symptoms. Symptoms such as constipation, cough, shortness of breath, dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, and fever have received little attention, consistent with previous research.[11] On the other hand, although survival and mortality were not sufficiently emphasized in previous PC studies, the word “end” was one of the most frequently repeated terms in this study. This may be related to the difficulty of providing PC nutrition support to cancer patients with advanced, progressive, and incurable conditions.[39]

4.1. Limitations and strengths

This bibliometric analysis is limited to original articles available in the Web of Science (WOS) database. Additionally, only articles written in English were included in the analysis, which may somewhat limit the global data analysis. Evaluating the strength of an article based solely on its citation count may prevent a more holistic evaluation.

On the other hand, the analysis of the publications by country based on multiple bibliometric parameters is a strength of this study.

5. Conclusion

This study is the first step toward analyzing and mapping research related to PC and nutrition. It shows that the number of publications related to PC and nutrition has steadily increased between 1991 and 2023. The USA and European countries are the top publishers and receive the most citations. Institutionally, countries that provide effective PC services continue to lead academically. Hot topics in the field include “end,” “nutrition,” “quality of life,” “hydration,” “cancer,” “symptoms,” and “management,” highlighting the complexity of the subject.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Özlem Öner.

Data curation: Özlem Öner, Pinar Ayvat.

Formal analysis: Özlem Öner.

Investigation: Özlem Öner, Pinar Ayvat.

Methodology: Özlem Öner, Pinar Ayvat.

Supervision: Özlem Öner, Ali Necati Gökmen.

Validation: Özlem Öner, Ali Necati Gökmen.

Visualization: Özlem Öner, Ali Necati Gökmen.

Writing – original draft: Özlem Öner, Ali Necati Gökmen.

Writing – review & editing: Özlem Öner.

Abbreviations:

Freq
frequency
IF
impact factor
MCP
multiple country publications
MeSH
medical subject headings
PC
palliative care
SCI
Science Citation Index
SCP
self-citation practices
USA
United States of America
WoS
Web of Science

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

How to cite this article: Öner Ö, Ayvat P, Gökmen AN. Nutritional therapy in palliative care units: A bibliometric analysis. Medicine 2025;104:10(e41772).

Contributor Information

Pinar Ayvat, Email: drpinarunde@yahoo.com.

Ali Necati Gökmen, Email: necati.gokmen@deu.edu.tr.

References

  • [1].WHO. https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/palliative-care. Accessed March 4, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Srivastava R, Srivastava S. Bibliometric analysis of Indian Journal of Palliative Care from 1995 to 2022 using the VOSviewer and Bibliometrix software. Indian J Palliat Care. 2022;28:338–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Zhang M, Li X. Focuses and trends of the studies on pediatric palliative care: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2018. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021;8:5–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Hsieh MH, Lin WC, Yeh TC, Liu CJ, Chen M, Liu CK. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of good death research from 2001-2021. Omega (Westport). 2023:302228231184301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Shreves A, Marcolini E. End of life/palliative care/ethics. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2014;32:955–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Efendioglu EM, Cigiloglu A, Turkbeyler IH. Malnutrition and depressive symptoms in elderly palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 2022;37:503–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Lonterman-Monasch S, de Vries OJ, Danner SA, Kramer MH, Muller M. Prevalence and determinants for malnutrition in geriatric outpatients. Clin Nutr. 2013;32:1007–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Cotogni P, Stragliotto S, Ossola M, Collo A, Riso S, On Behalf Of The Intersociety Italian Working Group For Nutritional Support In Cancer. The role of nutritional support for cancer patients in palliative care. Nutrients. 2021;13:306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Eberhardie C. Nutrition support in palliative care. Nurs Stand. 2002;17:47–52; quiz 54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Holmes S. Importance of nutrition in palliative care of patients with chronic disease. Nurs Stand. 2010;25:48–56; quiz 58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Fordjour GA, Chow AYM. Global research trend and bibliometric analysis of current studies on end-of-life care. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:11176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Öner O, Ecevit MC, Gökmen AN. A bibliometric analysis of obstructive sleep apnea and anesthesia. Medicine (Baltim). 2023;102:e32993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Pei Z, Chen S, Ding L, et al. Current perspectives and trend of nanomedicine in cancer: a review and bibliometric analysis. J Control Release. 2022;352:211–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Abu-Odah H, Molassiotis A, Liu JYW. Global palliative care research (2002-2020): bibliometric review and mapping analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022;12:376–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Liu X, Ding Z, Li X, Xue Z. Research progress, hotspots, and trends of using BIM to reduce building energy consumption: visual analysis based on WOS Database. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:3083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Leydesdorff L, Carley S, Rafols I. Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics. 2013;94:589–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:873–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:357–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Choudhri AF, Siddiqui A, Khan NR, Cohen HL. Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis. Radiographics. 2015;35:736–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Andersen PM, Abrahams S, Borasio GD, et al. ; EFNS Task Force on Diagnosis and Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. EFNS guidelines on the clinical management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (MALS)--revised report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:360–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].van der Steen JT, Radbruch L, Hertogh CM, et al. ; European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC). White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: a Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Palliat Med. 2014;28:197–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Wang CH, Finkel RS, Bertini ES, et al. ; Participants of the International Conference on SMA Standard of Care. Consensus statement for standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:1027–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Lupu D, Quigley L, Mehfoud N, Salsberg ES. The growing demand for hospice and palliative medicine physicians: will the supply keep up. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;55:1216–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].World Health Organization. Strengthening of palliative care as a component of integrated treatment throughout the life course. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2014;28:130–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Centeno C, Bolognesi D, Biasco G. Comparative analysis of specialization in palliative medicine processes within the World Health Organization European region. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;49:861–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Walshe C, Ahmed F, Preston N. Do journals contribute to the international publication of research in their field? A bibliometric analysis of palliative care journal data. Palliat Med. 2020;34:541–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Doyle D. Palliative medicine in Britain. Omega (Westport). 2007;56:77–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Hughes MT, Smith TJ. The growth of palliative care in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:459–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Bandewar SVS, Aggarwal A, Kumar R, Aggarwal R, Sahni P, Pai SA. Medical Council of India’s amended qualifications for Indian medical teachers: well intended, yet half-hearted. Indian J Cancer. 2018;55:1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Bhatnagar S. Palliative care research: Indian perspective. Indian J Palliat Care. 2014;20:167–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].sağlik bakanliği. https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR-100111/dunya-palyatif-bakim-gunu.html#:~:text=Palyatif%20Bak%C4%B1m%20Hizmetlerinin%20bir%20amac%C4%B1,24%20saat%20esas%C4%B1na%20g%C3%B6re%20%C3%A7al%C4%B1%C5%9F%C4%B1r. [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Vanbutsele G, Pardon K, Van Belle S, et al. Effect of early and systematic integration of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:394–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Numico G, Cristofano A, Mozzicafreddo A, et al. Hospital admission of cancer patients: avoidable practice or necessary care? PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Rocque GB, Barnett AE, Illig LC, et al. Inpatient hospitalization of oncology patients: are we missing an opportunity for end-of-life care? J Oncol Pract. 2013;9:51–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Hasson F, Nicholson E, Muldrew D, Bamidele O, Payne S, McIlfatrick S. International palliative care research priorities: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Bernardis A, Gonzalez-Jaramillo V, Ebneter AS, Eychmüller S. Palliative care and COVID-19: a bibliometric analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023:spcare–2022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Evangelista CB, Lopes ME, Costa SF, Batista PS, Batista JB, Oliveira AM. Palliative care and spirituality: an integrative literature review. Cuidados paliativos e espiritualidade: revisao integrativa da literatura. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016;69:591–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Holdoway A. Nutrition in palliative care: issues, perceptions and opportunities to improve care for patients. Br J Nurs. 2022;31:S20–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:11–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES