Skip to main content
Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids logoLink to Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
. 2025 Feb 10;36(1):102483. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102483

Albumin-conjugation enables improved tumor targeting of aptamers via SPECT imaging

Shaowen Yang 1,3,4,5, Chengwen Zheng 1,3,4,5, Sixuan Cheng 1,3,4, Li Wen 1,3,4, Pinghui Li 2, Jianbo Li 2, Xiaoli Lan 1,3,4, Dawei Jiang 1,3,4,
PMCID: PMC11904533  PMID: 40083648

Abstract

Aptamers are single-stranded oligonucleotides with specific spatial structures. They have been widely used in preclinical studies because of their high affinity and specificity for various biological targets. AS1411, an aptamer targeting the nucleolin overexpressed on the cancer cell membrane, is one of the most promising and extensively studied aptamers. However, extremely low bioavailability due to rapid renal excretion remains a great obstacle for aptamers’ clinical translation. Human serum albumin (HSA), with long blood circulation and excellent biocompatibility, has been an attractive vehicle for extending drugs’ blood half-life in the clinic. This work investigated the effect of an albumin-conjugated strategy in improving aptamers’ tumor targeting in vivo for the first time by taking AS1411 as an example. HSA-AS1411 was synthesized via the maleimide-sulfhydryl reaction. The excellent serum stability and maintained target affinity of HSA-AS1411 were demonstrated in vitro. The pharmacokinetic analysis and tumor SPECT imaging studies revealed that HSA-AS1411 had over 14 times longer circulation half-life and superior tumor uptake than those of AS1411. The immunofluorescence staining of tumor tissues further indicated the improved tumor retention of AS1411 as a result of prolonged blood circulation. Therefore, the HSA-conjugated strategy has a promising prospect in improving aptamers’ tumor targeting for clinical applications.

Keywords: MT: Oligonucleotides: Diagnostics and Biosensor, aptamer, albumin, AS1411, nuclear medicine, molecular imaging

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg


The effect of an albumin-conjugated strategy on aptamers’ blood circulation and tumor targeting has been systematically evaluated in vivo. After conjugating with HSA, the aptamer AS1411’s biological half-life was prolonged by above 14 times, and its tumor uptake was increased by about 16 times.

Introduction

Aptamers, single-stranded DNA or RNA molecules, possess unique three-dimensional structures that enable them to bind specifically to a wide array of ions and molecules.1,2,3,4,5 They exhibit superior affinity and selectivity for these biological targets, presenting several advantages over traditional antibodies, such as cost-effective production, chemical modifiability, enhanced stability, and improved biocompatibility.6,7 Aptamers function as highly programmable chemical antibodies, and their application in biosensing, bioimaging, and biomedicine has been extensively explored both in vitro and in vivo, particularly for the precise detection and treatment of cancer.8,9,10 For example, Tan and colleagues11 evaluated the binding specificity of the aptamer SGC8, which targets protein tyrosine kinase 7, in xenograft tumor models and subsequently conducted a phase 0 clinical trial to assess the biosafety and pharmacokinetics of SGC8 in human subjects. Additionally, the aptamer drug pegaptanib, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2004, acts as an antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor and has shown efficacy in treating exudative age-related macular degeneration.12

AS1411, a 26-base guanine-rich aptamer with a distinctive G-quadruplex structure, is among the most promising and extensively studied aptamers.13 It targets nucleolin, a protein that is overexpressed on the membranes of cancer cells, and has demonstrated significant antitumor activity by upregulating the tumor suppressor gene p53 and downregulating oncogenes Bcl-2 and Akt1.14 AS1411 has been applied for treating acute myeloid leukemia and renal cell carcinoma in phase II clinical trials,13,15 marking it as a pioneering anticancer aptamer in human use. However, the clinical usefulness of aptamers is challenged by their susceptibility to nuclease degradation and rapid renal clearance,16 which limits their theranostic time window and effectiveness. Strategies to enhance their bioavailability, such as chemical modifications in forms of 2′-functionalization, phosphorothioate backbone substitutions, or locked nucleic acids, have been developed to improve aptamers’ resistance to nuclease degradation.17,18,19 Nevertheless, there is an urgent need for approaches to extend their short circulation half-life (currently 5–10 min)20 and improve their tumor retention.

Several strategies have been proposed to extend the biological half-life of aptamers. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) modification is a well-established method for prolonging aptamers’ blood half-life by increasing their molecular weight beyond the renal filtration threshold.21,22,23,24 However, PEG’s immunogenicity can pose challenges in clinical settings, as seen in the severe allergic reactions reported during a phase 2b clinical study of the PEGylated anticoagulant therapy pegnivacogin.25 Alternatively, small hydrophobic molecules like Evans blue, which have a strong affinity for albumin’s hydrophobic pockets, have been explored for modifying aptamers.26,27,28 These modifications aim to leverage the hitchhiking effect by binding to endogenous albumins, potentially extending blood circulation. However, the unsatisfying blood half-life and insignificant improvement in tumor uptake have not yet met clinical needs. The complex internal environment can reduce aptamers’ affinity to endogenous albumins, and the uncertain binding sites on albumins may weaken aptamers’ targeting ability. Thus, there is an urgent need for a more biocompatible, controllable, and effective strategy to promote aptamers for clinical application.

Human serum albumin (HSA), known for its long circulation time and excellent biocompatibility, has been utilized to encapsulate drugs for clinical use, such as in Abraxane.29 HSA offers a single free sulfhydryl group at the 34th cysteine (cys34) for site-specific covalent binding,30,31,32 making it an attractive candidate for the synthesis of a homogeneous and controllable HSA-aptamer complex. This approach can circumvent issues associated with the HSA hitchhike strategy. Kuhlmann et al. have successfully synthesized an HSA-oligonucleotide assembly for potential half-life extension,33 and confirm the retained bioactivity of aptamers post-conjugation. However, subsequent studies on human FcRn affinity revealed that the HSA-aptamer construct has a 9-fold lower affinity than unmodified HSA unless substituted with a recombinant high-binding albumin variant (HB). This finding is inconsistent with the expected long blood circulation of HSA-aptamer and may hinder the application of HSA-aptamer coupling technology due to uncertain biological safety and challenges in obtaining HB. Nevertheless, numerous studies indicate that in vitro analyses may not accurately reflect drugs’ pharmacological activity or pharmacokinetic properties in organisms, as they do not closely mimic biological systems.34,35,36,37,38,39 Therefore, systematic studies in vivo are vital for assessing how the HSA conjugation strategy affects aptamers’ bioactivity and blood circulation compared with in vitro experiments.

With advancements in molecular imaging technologies such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of targeted drugs can be non-invasively visualized and precisely quantified in vivo.40,41,42 In this study, we synthesized an HSA-aptamer conjugation according to the method reported by Kuhlmann and colleagues33 with AS1411 as a model and systematically evaluated the impact of the HSA-conjugation strategy on the pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting of AS1411 in vivo using SPECT imaging and other nuclear medicine techniques. Our findings strongly support the potential of HSA-AS1411 as an efficient and practical method for improving aptamer blood circulation and tumor retention.

Results

Synthesis of HSA-oligonucleotides

A random sequence (RS) with the same strand length as AS1411 was selected as the control. HSA-AS1411 and HSA-RS were synthesized by a one-step maleimide-sulfhydryl reaction and purified by an ion exchange column (IEX). The specific site-directed synthesis processes were comprehensively delineated in Figure 1. The chromatogram at 260 nm (Figure 2A) showed that HSA was eluted, first because of the lowest negative charge. HSA-AS1411 or HSA-RS had increased negative charges due to conjugated oligonucleotides, thus separated entirely from HSA. The unreacted oligonucleotides were the last to be eluted.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Specific site-directed synthesis processes and excellent in vivo effect of HSA-AS1411

(A) The synthesis of HSA-AS1411 involved a Michael addition reaction targeting the only free thiol group on HSA. (B) HSA-AS1411 prolonged the blood circulation and tumor uptake of AS1411 in vivo.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Synthesis and characterization of HSA-AS1411

(A) Purification of HSA-AS1411 and HSA-RS by IEX. The chromatogram at 260 nm showed complete separation of HSA-AS1411 (or HSA-RS) from the mixture. (B) SDS gel electrophoresis. (C) TBE-Urea gel electrophoresis. Coomassie staining (B) and nucleic acid staining (C) co-confirmed the conjugation and purity of HSA-AS1411 (or HSA-RS). Mal, maleimide.

The synthesis and purity of HSA-AS1411 and HSA-RS were investigated by gel electrophoresis. The protein staining (Figure 2B) and DNA staining (Figure 2C) showed the conjugation between HSA and oligonucleotides. HSA-AS1411 and HSA-RS were successfully purified without unreacted HSA or DNA in the product lanes. In addition, since HSA has the only reactive thiol group, HSA-AS1411 and HSA-RS were homogeneous, with only one DNA chain attached. The results of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) (Figure S1) further confirmed the conclusion above.

Excellent serum stability and maintained nucleolin-binding ability of HSA-AS1411 in vitro

The serum stability of HSA-AS1411 in vitro is vital for AS1411’s long-time retained bioactivity after prolonged blood circulation, which was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure 3A) and quantified by the corresponding band intensity (Figure 3B). Overall, HSA-AS1411 and AS1411 exhibited superior serum stability, with more than 50% remaining at 48 h, whereas approximately 90% of HSA-RS and RS were rapidly degraded by the nuclease. This may result from that AS1411 can form a stable G-quadruplex structure resistant to nuclease degradation.43 Interestingly, approximately 50% of HSA-AS1411 retained the intact structure after 48 h, while AS1411 began to degrade rapidly. The corresponding band intensity of HSA-AS1411 was significantly stronger than AS1411 (p < 0.001) at 60 h (Figure 3B). Meanwhile, HSA-RS was also more stable than RS before 36 h (p = 0.0011 at 6 h, p = 0.0018 at 12 h, and p = 0.0053 at 24 h). The results indicated the excellent serum stability of HSA-AS1411. Moreover, the serum stability of AS1411 and RS was improved after coupling with HSA, but whether this effect can be applied to other oligonucleotides remains to be further investigated.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Evaluation of HSA-AS1411’s serum stability

HSA-AS1411, HSA-RS, and corresponding bare oligonucleotides were incubated with 50% FBS at RT. The aliquots (n = 3) were collected and resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis (A). The bands were quantified by ImageJ and the relative band intensity-time curve was plotted (B). ∗∗∗Significant difference between HSA-AS1411 and AS1411 group (p < 0.001), ##Significant difference between HSA-RS and RS group (p < 0.01). Error bars show SD.

Next, we assessed HSA-AS1411’s binding affinity to nucleolins on the cellular level. We selected 4T1 breast cancer cells with high-level expression of the nucleolin44 and performed the immunofluorescence staining. Both HSA-AS1411 and AS1411 exhibited fast and tight binding to 4T1 cells after being incubated at 37°C for 1 h (Figure 4). This suggested the maintained binding affinity of AS1411 after conjugation to HSA. Meanwhile, we found that the fluorescence signal of AS1411 was located in the nucleus and cytoplasm of 4T1 cells, whereas HSA-AS1411 was mainly located in the cytoplasm. We will investigate the change of AS1411’s location in the subcellular level after HSA conjugation and its impact on the anti-tumor cell proliferation activity of AS1411 in future studies. In summary, HSA-AS1411 demonstrated excellent serum stability and maintained nucleolin affinity in vitro, which provided the basis for subsequent in vivo studies.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Immunofluorescence staining to investigate the nucleolin-targeting ability of HSA-AS1411 in 4T1 breast cancer cells

Scale bar, 50 μm. Cy5, cyanine 5.

99mTc radiolabeling of HSA-AS1411

Molecular imaging techniques allow convenient and accurate evaluation of drugs’ pharmacokinetics and tumor-targeting in preclinical and clinical studies.45,46 Technetium-99m (99mTc, half-life = 6.02 h) was determined as the tracer nuclide for the mild radiolabeling environment and appropriate half-life matched with the expected long blood circulation of HSA-AS1411. We prepared four 99mTc-labeled probes with high labeling efficiency: 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411, 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-RS, 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411, and 99mTc-HYNIC-RS. Their UV chromatograms remained consistent before and after labeling, indicating their chemical stability under the radiolabeling procedure (Figure S2). The radiochemical purity of four 99mTc-labeled probes was all more than 95% (Figure S3), and their apparent molar activity was 23.18 ± 0.75 MBq/nmol, 23.65 ± 1.59 MBq/nmol, 24.23 ± 2.03 MBq/nmol, and 24.36 ± 1.92 MBq/nmol, respectively. In addition, all four 99mTc-labeled probes showed good serum stability, retaining above 60% after 36 h (Figures S4–S7). These data allow us to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tumor uptake of HSA-AS1411 more accurately in vivo by nuclear medicine techniques.

Prolonged blood circulation and improved bioavailability of HSA-AS1411

First, we investigated the effect of the HSA-conjugated strategy on prolonging the blood circulation of AS1411 in vivo. 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 was applied for more convenient quantification of HSA-AS1411’s plasma concentration, with 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411 as the control. A two-compartment model (Figure 5C) was used in the pharmacokinetics study. The radioactive plasma concentration-versus-time curves of the two probes were shown in Figures 5A and 5B, and multiple pharmacokinetics parameters were presented in Figure 5D. The elimination half-life (T1/2β) of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 was 14.28 ± 1.15 h, approximately 14 times that of 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411 (0.92 ± 0.49 h). This suggested that the blood half-life of AS1411 is significantly extended after HSA conjugation. The clearance rate (CL) data showed AS1411’s rapid clearance from blood, while HSA-AS1411 was retained in the blood for a long time. We also compared the area under the curve (AUC) of them. The AUC0–∞ of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 was 101.49 ± 10.07 MBq/L ∗h, while 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411 was only 1.05 ± 0.29 MBq/L ∗h. This reflected that the bioavailability of AS1411 was greatly increased to 100-fold after HSA conjugation. Overall, the HSA-conjugated strategy has significantly improved the blood circulation and bioavailability of AS1411, and it is promising to greatly increase AS1411’s tumor retention in vivo.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Pharmacokinetics study of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411

The radioactive concentration of plasma (n = 5) was presented in terms of MBq/L. The plasma concentration versus time curves were analyzed by a two-compartmental model. (A and B) The plasma concentration versus time curves of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 and 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411. Error bars show SD. (C) The illustration of the two-compartmental model. IV, intravenous injection. (D) Pharmacokinetic parameters calculated by DAS 2.0.

HSA-conjugation improves AS1411’s tumor-targeting

Next, we evaluated HSA-AS1411’s tumor-targeting in 4T1 subcutaneous tumor models by SPECT-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging. As shown in Figures 6A and 6B, 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 and 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-RS exhibited excellent blood circulation, with above 10 percent of injected dose per gram (%ID/g) in the blood at 12 h and around 5%ID/g until 36 h. Their blood pool signals gradually decreased and were finally metabolized by the liver. In contrast, 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411 and 99mTc-HYNIC-RS were rapidly excreted from the body, with a small amount accumulated in the liver, probably due to the lipid solubility brought by the HYNIC. The tumor accumulations of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 and 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-RS were maintained at a high level and progressively increased as the blood signal declined, with 13.61 ± 1.92%ID/g and 8.60 ± 1.33%ID/g at 36 h, respectively. However, there was almost no radioactivity uptake in the tumors in the group of 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411 (0.80 ± 0.07%ID/g at 36 h) and 99mTc-HYNIC-RS (0.53 ± 0.04%ID/g at 36 h). More notably, the tumor uptake of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 was significantly higher than 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-RS after 12 h as the blood concentration decreased (p = 0.0209 at 12 h and p = 0.0252 at 36 h) (Figure 6B), suggesting that, in addition to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, the increased tumor uptake was partly attributed to the improved tumor-targeting of AS1411.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

SPECT-CT imaging and 36 h biodistribution study of the four probes (99mTc-labeled HSA-AS1411, HSA-RS, AS1411, and RS) in 4T1 subcutaneous tumor models (n = 3)

(A) SPECT-CT images for multiple periods (3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 h). The arrow refers to the tumor. (B) Radioactive signal intensity-time curves of heart content and tumor. ∗ and ns represent the significant difference between 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 and 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-RS. (C) Radioactive counts of ex vivo organs and tissues by the gamma counter at 36 h after post-injection. (D) Comparison of T/B and T/M between 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 and 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-RS. Error bars show SD. ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗p < 0.05; ns, no significance.

The ex vivo distribution study at 36 h post-injection (Figures 6C and S9; Table S1) also confirmed the tumor uptake of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 was significantly higher than other groups. Among them, the HSA-AS1411 group was approximately 26 times higher than AS1411. Meanwhile, its blood radioactive signal intensity was about 33 times the AS1411 group. These data more directly demonstrated the excellent effect of HSA conjugation in prolonging blood circulation and improving tumor accumulation of AS1411. We also calculated the radioactivity radio of tumor to blood (T/B) and tumor to muscle (T/M) in the HSA-AS1411 and HSA-RS groups to eliminate the EPR effects in tumor uptake. The ratio of T/M showed a significant difference (p = 0.0229), while the difference of T/B was not (p = 0.1242) (Figure 6D).

To further validate that the HAS-conjugated strategy improves the tumor-targeting of AS1411, we performed immunofluorescence staining of the tumor sections to visualize the specific binding of AS1411 to the nucleolin expressed in tumors (Figure 7). The cyanine 3 (Cy3)-modified HSA-AS1411 exhibited high fluorescence intensity in tumor tissues, with a part co-localized with the nucleolin. In contrast, Cy3-HSA-RS had only a moderate fluorescence signal, and Cy3-AS1411 or Cy3-RS had almost no signal in tumor sections. This further illustrates that the HSA conjugation increased the tumor uptake of AS1411, leading to a prolonged interaction with the nucleolin overexpressed on tumor cells, thus improving the tumor-targeting ability of AS1411.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Immunofluorescence staining of 4T1 tumors collected from the four Cy3-modified probes treatment groups (Cy3-HSA-AS1411, Cy3-HSA-RS, Cy3-AS1411, and Cy3-RS)

The yellow color means the co-localization of Cy3-HSA-AS1411 and nucleolin. Scale bar, 50 μm.

HSA-AS1411 is biocompatible for potential clinical applications

Finally, we assessed the biocompatibility of HSA-AS1411 for potential clinical studies in the future. After 36 h intravenous injection, the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of HSA-AS1411’s major retention and metabolizing organs (including the heart, liver, and kidney) showed no obvious organ toxicity (Figure S8). This suggests that HSA-AS1411 has a good prospect of clinical application for its promising biosafety.

Discussion

The emergence of tumor-targeting drugs has transformed the traditional paradigm of cancer diagnosis and treatment.47 Compared with traditional chemotherapeutic drugs, they have efficient anticancer effects with less toxicity to healthy tissues, making tumor-targeted imaging more precise and therapy more effective in clinical settings.48 As novel tumor-targeting agents, aptamers have received increasing attention in preclinical and clinical studies. Currently, the most urgent issue for aptamers’ clinical applications is how to extend their biological half-life and increase their bioavailability, thereby maximizing the therapeutic benefit to patients.

In this study, HSA was determined as the carrier in the novel aptamer blood half-life extending strategy, considering its excellent biocompatibility and extensive drug delivery applications. We synthesized a homogeneous HSA-AS1411 complex with only one aptamer attached to the only free sulfhydryl group on HSA (Figures 2 and S1). Moreover, the coupling site is located in the domain Ⅰ of HSA, which is distant from the primary neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) engagement site in domain Ⅲ.49 This offers the opportunity that HSA-AS1411 will maintain the affinity to FcRn and have a long blood circulation like HSA.

There are two prerequisites for the effectiveness of blood circulation-extending strategies for aptamers in vivo: good serum stability and sustained tumor-targeting ability. First, aptamers’ serum stability must be matched to the extended long blood circulation, which implies a prolonged interaction with serum nuclease. However, due to the susceptibility to nuclease, most unmodified aptamers can only maintain structurally stable in the serum for minutes to a few hours.50 This leads to the fact that most aptamers are rapidly degraded and lose bioactivity after being injected intravenously, with only a small amount reaching the tumor site. Thus, we confirmed the excellent serum stability of HSA-AS1411 in vitro before in vivo studies. Benefiting from AS1411’s inherent anti-nuclease degradation ability, HSA-AS1411 can accumulate a high concentration with retained nucleolin-targeting ability at the tumor site for a long time, resulting in high uptake by tumors. However, serum stability improvement technologies are recommended for other aptamers. Second, blood circulation-extending strategies are usually achieved by modifying small hydrophobic chemical agents that can be inserted into endogenous albumin,26,27,28,51 or coupling them with long-circulating biomolecules such as albumin, IgG FcRn, and the albumin-binding domain (ABD).52,53,54,55,56 The evaluation of aptamers’ targeting affinity is crucial after modification or conjugation strategies, because the formation of aptamers’ specific structure may be affected due to the steric hindrance effect. These two prerequisites may provide support for the development of blood circulation-extending strategies.

Molecular imaging, or more specifically, nuclear medicine, enables us to evaluate the effect of blood circulation extending strategies on tumor-targeting drugs more conveniently and accurately.57 With regard to the modification of aptamer drugs, the effect includes two aspects: the prolonged blood half-life and increased tumor uptake. The high radiochemical purity (RCP) and expected serum stability of the prepared 99mTc-labeled HSA-AS1411 allowed us to accurately and quantitatively evaluate the effect of HSA conjugation on AS1411 in vivo. As shown in Figures 5 and 6, HSA-AS1411 has a 14-fold increase in blood half-life and nearly 100-fold improvement in bioavailability (presented as AUC) compared with AS1411. The tumor uptake of the HSA-AS1411 group is 26 times higher than the AS1411 group at 36 h. Moreover, our results suggest the HSA conjugation has not only increased AS1411’s tumor uptake through the EPR effect but also improved its tumor retention via aptamer specific binding to its target. We speculated that the high tumor accumulation of HSA-AS1411 increased the probability of the interaction with the nucleolin highly expressed on 4T1 cells, thus improving the nucleolin-targeting ability of AS1411.

The significant limitation of the HSA-conjugated strategy is its sustained massive liver uptake, which could hinder subsequent therapeutic studies combining chemotherapy or radioimmunotherapy.58,59 HSA’s high molecular weight (∼66 kDa) and ultimate metabolism by the liver may account for this. In addition, HSA-AS1411’s excessive blood circulation may lead to the adsorption of large amounts of endogenous albumin, making inevitable high liver uptake.60 Therefore, the critical challenge for aptamers’ blood circulation-extending strategies is to search for chemical or protein molecules with the following properties: (1) appropriate affinity for endogenous albumin, (2) small molecular weights and can rapidly excreted from the kidneys or intestines, and (3) excellent biocompatibility. Based on these, our group has selected some hydrophobic chemical molecules as candidates and achieved some initial satisfactory results. Meanwhile, the ABD is also a promising candidate, a small, three-helical protein domain that has completed extending the blood half-life of peptides and antibody fragments.54,56 We will evaluate the effect of ABD on aptamers’ blood circulation in future research.

In conclusion, the HSA-conjugated strategy has significantly prolonged AS1411’s blood circulation and improved its tumor-targeting ability. Considering the excellent biocompatibility of HSA, we hold great promise that this strategy will greatly improve aptamers’ tumor-targeting therapeutic effects and promote their clinical applications in the future.

Materials and methods

Materials

HSA was obtained from Biosharp (Beijing, China). 4S Red Plus Nucleic Acid Gel Stain 10,000× was purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). SDS Running Buffer (20×), Tris Acetate-EDTA (TAE) Buffer (10×), and Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) Buffer (10×) were purchased from ThermoFisher (Shanghai, China). We obtained 2% NA-Red agarose gel, SDS-poly (acrylamide) gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) Gel Preparation Kit, TBE-urea poly (acrylamide) gel electrophoresis (TBE-Urea PAGE) Preparation Kit, and BCA Protein Assay Kit from Beyotime Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). Fast Coomassie Brilliant Blue Staining Solution (10×) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were obtained from Elabscience (Wuhan, China). N-Hydroxysuccinimide ester of hydrazinonicotinic acid (HYNIC-NHS ester) was purchased from Ruixibio (Xi’an, China). All other unbranded chemical agents were purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (Shanghai, China).

All DNA strands with or without modification, were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) without further purification. AS1411: 5′-TTTTGGTGGTGGTGGTTGTGGTGGTGGTGG-3′. RS: 5′-TTTTNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN-3′, N refers to random bases.

Synthesis of HSA-oligonucleotides

AS1411 was modified with Mal at the 5′ end by Sangon Biotech. Mal-AS1411 was dissolved in the nuclease-free water before the reaction. The concentration of Mal-AS1411 was measured at A260 on a microplate reader (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA, USA). HSA (powder, 5 equivalents [eq.]) was added to the Mal-AS1411 solution and dissolved completely by ultrasound. The reaction was carried out at 400 rpm overnight at room temperature (RT). HSA-RS was synthesized in the same way.

IEX purification

HSA-AS1411 and HSA-RS were purified by an AKTA pure protein purification system (GE Healthcare; Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). The system was equipped with IEX (Hitrap Capto ImpRes Q 1∗1 mL; GE Healthcare). The mixtures were eluted with A (20 mM Tris-HCl and 10 mM NaCl) and B (20 mM Tris-HCl and 1M NaCl), using a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min at RT. The gradient was 40% B at 0 min, increased from 40% to 80% B in 40 min, then from 80% to 100% B in 5 min, and finally kept at 100% B for 5 min. The collected fractions were desalted and concentrated with nuclease-free water washing three times in Millipore 10 kDa ultrafiltration tubes. The purified products were quantified with the BCA Protein Assay kit and stored lyophilized at −20°C.

MALDI-TOF analysis

MALDI-TOF experiments were performed by a RapifleX MALDI-TOF/TOF. HSA was used as the standard, and 1 μL standard and desalted samples were taken onto the sample target. After drying naturally, 0.6 μL CHCA was brought onto the corresponding target and dried naturally. The molecular weight of the samples was tested after calibrating the sample target with the test standard. The laser source was 335 nm, and the scanning range was 1000–80000 Da. The raw data and plots generated by MALDI-TOF/TOF were analyzed and processed by flexAnalysis (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Germany).

Gel electrophoresis

SDS-PAGE and TBE-Urea PAGE were used to assess the conjugation and purity of HSA-AS1411 and HSA-RS with protein staining and DNA staining, respectively. Briefly, 8% SDS-poly (acrylamide) gels and 8% TBE-urea poly (acrylamide) gels were prepared according to instructions provided by Beyotime Biotechnology. SDS-PAGE was run at 120 v for 50 min. TBE-Urea PAGE was run at 150 v for 60 min. SDS gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, and TBE-Urea gels were stained with 4S Red Plus Nucleic Acid Gel Stain after the electrophoresis. Gels were scanned using a gel imaging scanner (Analytik Jena; Jena, Germany). Coomassie was detected by white light, and 4S Red Plus was detected by ultraviolet light.

Serum stability evaluation

We incubated 100 pmol of HSA-AS1411, HSA-RS, AS1411, and RS in 50% FBS (HyClone; Logan, Utah, USA) for 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h at RT, respectively. Samples were then collected and analyzed using 2% NA-Red agarose gel electrophoresis with 1× TAE as the running buffer. The gel images were acquired by a gel imaging scanner, and the band intensity was quantified by ImageJ.

Cell lines and cell culture

The 4T1 mouse breast cancer cell line was obtained from the Shanghai Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. 4T1 cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco; Grand Island, NY, USA) including 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Procell, Wuhan) at 37°C and 5% CO2 atmosphere. The 4T1 cells were used for subsequent experiments when reaching the logarithmic growth phase.

Cellular immunofluorescence staining to investigate HSA-AS1411’s binding affinity to the nucleolin

We inoculated 4T1 cells onto 14-mm glass coverslips (Biosharp) at the density of 5 × 104 and incubated overnight. Then, the cells were incubated with 200 pmol/mL Cy5 modified HSA-AS1411 or AS1411 in the serum-free culture medium for 1 h at 37°C and washed three times with PBS. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China) for 10 min at RT. After washing three times again with PBS, cells were stained with DAPI for 10 min at RT. Finally, they were incubated in the Antifade Mounting Medium (Beyotime) and imaged by the automatic slice scanning system (OLYMPUS; VS120).

Synthesis of 99mTc radiolabeled HSA-AS1411

HSA-AS1411 and HSA-RS were dissolved in PBS, while NH2-AS1411 and NH2-RS were dissolved in a carbonate buffer (pH = 8.5) for better chelator modification efficiency. HYNIC-NHS ester (dissolved in DMSO, 30 eq.) was added to the solution and reacted overnight at 4°C away from light for the synthesis of HYNIC-HSA-AS1411, HYNIC-HSA-RS, HYNIC-AS1411, and HYNIC-RS. The mixtures were purified with NAP-5 columns (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) to remove excess HYNIC-NHS ester.

The 99mTc radiolabeling procedure followed the reported methods. In brief, tricine (0.1 mg) and SnCl2 (30 μg) were added to the HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 solution and mixed with 99mTcO4- eluate (500 μL, 1,110 MBq; eluted from 99mTc/99Mo generator). The mixture was shaken at RT for 30 min, then purified with a PD-10 desalting column (GE Health) to obtain 99mTc-labeled HYNIC-HSA-AS1411. The other three probes were obtained similarly: 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-RS, 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411, and 99mTc-HYNIC-RS. Quality control was performed to investigate the stability of four probes under the radiolabeling environment by high-performance liquid chromatography (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The apparent molar activity of four 99mTc-labeling probes was calculated and presented as MBq/nmol. The RCP was determined by radio-ITLC (mobile phase: acetone).

The serum stability of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411, 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-RS, 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411, and 99mTc-HYNIC-RS was investigated. After being incubated in 50% FBS at RT for multiple periods (6, 12, 24, and 36 h), the RCP of samples was measured by radio-ITLC, and the radioactive serum stability of four probes was reflected by the RCP at different time points.

Animals and tumor modeling

All animal experiments followed the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Huazhong University of Science and Technology-approved protocol. Female BALB/c mice (4–6 weeks old) were provided by Henan Skobes Biotechnology Co., Ltd. All mice were fed with standard diets and water. We inoculated 100 μL 4T1 cell suspension (containing 1 × 107 cells) into the right axilla of each mouse for subcutaneous xenograft model construction. Mice with 200–400 mm3 tumor volumes were used in vivo tumor-targeting studies.

Pharmacokinetics study

The healthy BALB/c mice were injected with 37 MBq of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411 via the tail vein. 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411 with the same radioactive dose served as the control group. Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital vein of mice with capillary tubes at multiple time points (99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411: 0.0167, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h; 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411: 0.0167, 0.0833, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h). They were weighted, and the radioactivity was measured by a gamma counter (2470, WIZARD; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The plasma concentration was presented in terms of MBq/L and analyzed by a two-compartmental model after attenuation correction. The plasma concentration versus time curves were drawn by the GraphPad Prism software (version 9.5, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by DAS 2.0 (BioGuider Co., Shanghai, China), including the following: maximum plasma concentration, time to reach maximum plasma concentration; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero (predose) to infinity (AUC0–∞); area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero (predose) to the last time point (AUC0–t); CL; distribution rate constant (K10, K12, and K21); distribution half-life (T1/2α); T1/2β; and mean residence time.

SPECT-CT imaging and ex vivo biodistribution

Mice with 200–400 mm3 tumor volumes were randomly divided into four groups for SPECT-CT imaging and ex vivo biodistribution. We injected 37 MBq of 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-AS1411, 99mTc-HYNIC-HSA-RS, 99mTc-HYNIC-AS1411, and 99mTc-HYNIC-RS via the tail vein, respectively. All images were acquired by the micro-PET/SPECT-CT multimodal imaging system (InliView-3000B, Novel Medical, Yongxin Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The mice were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation during the scanning duration. Statistic scanning was performed at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 h after injection. Maximum intensity projection and transaxial images were shown using the NMSoft-ALWS V1.8 software (Novel Medical). For quantitative analysis, regions of interest of heart content (i.e., blood pool) and tumors were delineated on selected transaxial images, and the radioactive counts were presented in terms of %ID/g.

The ex vivo biodistribution studies were performed at 36 h after injection to quantify the uptake of four radiolabeling probes in organs/tissues. The mice were sacrificed, and multiple organs/tissues (including the blood, brain, heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, muscle, bone, and tumor) were collected. The radioactivity of organs/tissues was quantified by the gamma counter. The biodistribution data were represented as %ID/g after attenuation correction. T/B and T/M were calculated to eliminate the effects of radioactive signals in the blood pool.

Immunofluorescence staining of tumor sections

Mice with 200–400 mm3 tumor volumes were randomly divided into four groups and injected with Cy3-HSA-AS1411, Cy3-HSA-RS, Cy3-AS1411, and Cy3-RS via the tail vein, respectively. The mice were euthanized after 36 h, and tumor tissues were collected, washed three times with PBS, fixed in the 4% paraformaldehyde solution, and embedded in the paraffin. After being cut into 5-mm slices, they were blocked with BSA (Solarbio) and incubated with an anti-nucleolin primary polyclonal antibody (Sanying, Wuhan; 10556-1-ap) overnight at 4°C. Then the tumor tissue slices were treated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA; F2761) away from light for 50 min at RT. After being washed with PBS three times, DAPI was added to stain the nuclei for 10 min at RT. The multi-channel fluorescence images of tumor sections were obtained by the fluorescence microscope and processed by ImageJ.

Biosafety assessment of HSA-AS1411

The healthy BALB/c mice were randomly divided into three groups to assess the biosafety of HSA-AS1411, with AS1411 and saline as the control. In detail, HSA-AS1411, AS1411, and an equal volume of saline were injected via the tail vein, respectively. The mice were euthanized after 36 h. The main retention and metabolizing organs (the heart, liver, and kidney) were dissociated, sliced, and stained by the H&E solution. Images were obtained by the microscope.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis and charting were performed by the GraphPad Prism software (version 9.5). All data were shown as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired Student’s t test (two-tailed). Differences were considered statistically significant when p values were less than 0.05.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed in this study are available upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB3808200), National Natural Science Foundation of China (22277031, 82102121), and Open Program of Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging (No. 2023fzyx011).

Author contributions

D.J. conceived and supervised the work. S.Y. and C.Z. conducted the experiments and analyzed the results. S.Y. wrote the manuscript. S.C. provided advice on drawing figures. L.W. and P.L. provided assistance in the experiments. D.J., J.L., and X.L. revised the manuscript.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102483.

Supplemental information

Document S1. Figures S1–S9 and Table S1
mmc1.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (5.8MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Chen S., Zhang L., Yuan Q., Tan J. Current Advances in Aptamer-based Biomolecular Recognition and Biological Process Regulation. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2022;38:847–855. doi: 10.1007/s40242-022-2087-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miao Y., Gao Q., Mao M., Zhang C., Yang L., Yang Y., Han D. Bispecific Aptamer Chimeras Enable Targeted Protein Degradation on Cell Membranes. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021;60:11267–11271. doi: 10.1002/anie.202102170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sun W., Du L., Li M. Aptamer-based carbohydrate recognition. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010;16:2269–2278. doi: 10.2174/138161210791792877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhu H., Wu E., Pan Z., Zhang C., Zhang Y., Liao Q., Wang Y., Sun Y., Ye M., Wu W. Development of an Aptamer-Based Molecular Tool for Specifically Targeting Microglia via the CD64 Protein. Anal. Chem. 2023;95:3238–3246. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Azzouz A., Hejji L., Kumar V., Kim K.-H. Nanomaterials-based aptasensors: An efficient detection tool for heavy-metal and metalloid ions in environmental and biological samples. Environ. Res. 2023;238 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fu Z., Xiang J. Aptamer-Functionalized Nanoparticles in Targeted Delivery and Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21 doi: 10.3390/ijms21239123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhou J., Rossi J. Aptamers as targeted therapeutics: current potential and challenges. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017;16:181–202. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kou X., Zhang X., Shao X., Jiang C., Ning L. Recent advances in optical aptasensor technology for amplification strategies in cancer diagnostics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020;412:6691–6705. doi: 10.1007/s00216-020-02774-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meng H.-M., Liu H., Kuai H., Peng R., Mo L., Zhang X.-B. Aptamer-integrated DNA nanostructures for biosensing, bioimaging and cancer therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:2583–2602. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00645g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu H., Lin J., Ling N., Zhang Y., He Y., Qiu L., Tan W. Functional Nucleic Acid-Based Immunomodulation for T Cell-Mediated Cancer Therapy. ACS Nano. 2024;18:119–135. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c09861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ding D., Zhao H., Wei D., Yang Q., Yang C., Wang R., Chen Y., Li L., An S., Xia Q., et al. The First-in-Human Whole-Body Dynamic Pharmacokinetics Study of Aptamer. Research. 2023;6 doi: 10.34133/research.0126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Takeda A.L., Colquitt J., Clegg A.J., Jones J. Pegaptanib and ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1177–1182. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.118562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bates P.J., Laber D.A., Miller D.M., Thomas S.D., Trent J.O. Discovery and development of the G-rich oligonucleotide AS1411 as a novel treatment for cancer. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2009;86:151–164. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cheng Y., Zhao G., Zhang S., Nigim F., Zhou G., Yu Z., Song Y., Chen Y., Li Y. AS1411-Induced Growth Inhibition of Glioma Cells by Up-Regulation of p53 and Down-Regulation of Bcl-2 and Akt1 via Nucleolin. PLoS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rosenberg J.E., Bambury R.M., Van Allen E.M., Drabkin H.A., Lara P.N., Harzstark A.L., Wagle N., Figlin R.A., Smith G.W., Garraway L.A., et al. A phase II trial of AS1411 (a novel nucleolin-targeted DNA aptamer) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Invest. N. Drugs. 2014;32:178–187. doi: 10.1007/s10637-013-0045-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Röthlisberger P., Hollenstein M. Aptamer chemistry. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018;134:3–21. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harp J.M., Guenther D.C., Bisbe A., Perkins L., Matsuda S., Bommineni G.R., Zlatev I., Foster D.J., Taneja N., Charisse K., et al. Structural basis for the synergy of 4'- and 2'-modifications on siRNA nuclease resistance, thermal stability and RNAi activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:8090–8104. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koller E., Vincent T.M., Chappell A., De S., Manoharan M., Bennett C.F. Mechanisms of single-stranded phosphorothioate modified antisense oligonucleotide accumulation in hepatocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:4795–4807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jepsen J.S., Sørensen M.D., Wengel J. Locked nucleic acid: a potent nucleic acid analog in therapeutics and biotechnology. Oligonucleotides. 2004;14:130–146. doi: 10.1089/1545457041526317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Keefe A.D., Pai S., Ellington A. Aptamers as therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010;9:537–550. doi: 10.1038/nrd3141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Da Pieve C., Blackshaw E., Missailidis S., Perkins A.C. PEGylation and biodistribution of an anti-MUC1 aptamer in MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice. Bioconjug. Chem. 2012;23:1377–1381. doi: 10.1021/bc300128r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haruta K., Otaki N., Nagamine M., Kayo T., Sasaki A., Hiramoto S., Takahashi M., Hota K., Sato H., Yamazaki H. A Novel PEGylation Method for Improving the Pharmacokinetic Properties of Anti-Interleukin-17A RNA Aptamers. Nucleic Acid Therapeut. 2017;27:36–44. doi: 10.1089/nat.2016.0627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Takafuji Y., Jo J.-I., Tabata Y. Simple PEG modification of DNA aptamer based on copper ion coordination for tumor targeting. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2011;22:1179–1195. doi: 10.1163/092050610X501713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang Y., Wang D., Lin J., Lyu Z., Chen P., Sun T., Xue C., Mojtabavi M., Vedadghavami A., Zhang Z., et al. A Long-Circulating Vector for Aptamers Based upon Polyphosphodiester-Backboned Molecular Brushes. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022;61 doi: 10.1002/anie.202204576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Povsic T.J., Vavalle J.P., Aberle L.H., Kasprzak J.D., Cohen M.G., Mehran R., Bode C., Buller C.E., Montalescot G., Cornel J.H., et al. A Phase 2, randomized, partially blinded, active-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of variable anticoagulation reversal using the REG1 system in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results of the RADAR trial. Eur. Heart J. 2013;34:2481–2489. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ding D., Yang C., Lv C., Li J., Tan W. Improving Tumor Accumulation of Aptamers by Prolonged Blood Circulation. Anal. Chem. 2020;92:4108–4114. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jin C., Zhang H., Zou J., Liu Y., Zhang L., Li F., Wang R., Xuan W., Ye M., Tan W. Floxuridine Homomeric Oligonucleotides "Hitchhike" with Albumin In Situ for Cancer Chemotherapy. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018;57:8994–8997. doi: 10.1002/anie.201804156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang C., Zhao H., Sun Y., Wang C., Geng X., Wang R., Tang L., Han D., Liu J., Tan W. Programmable manipulation of oligonucleotide-albumin interaction for elongated circulation time. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:3083–3095. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Malam Y., Loizidou M., Seifalian A.M. Liposomes and nanoparticles: nanosized vehicles for drug delivery in cancer. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009;30:592–599. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Absar S., Nahar K., Choi S., Ahsan F., Yang V.C., Kwon Y.M. Serum albumin-protamine conjugate for biocompatible platform for targeted delivery of therapeutic macromolecules. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2014;102:2481–2490. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Caspersen M.B., Kuhlmann M., Nicholls K., Saxton M.J., Andersen B., Bunting K., Cameron J., Howard K.A. Albumin-based drug delivery using cysteine 34 chemical conjugates - important considerations and requirements. Ther. Deliv. 2017;8:511–519. doi: 10.4155/tde-2017-0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wall A., Nicholls K., Caspersen M.B., Skrivergaard S., Howard K.A., Karu K., Chudasama V., Baker J.R. Optimised approach to albumin-drug conjugates using monobromomaleimide-C-2 linkers. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019;17:7870–7873. doi: 10.1039/c9ob00721k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kuhlmann M., Hamming J.B.R., Voldum A., Tsakiridou G., Larsen M.T., Schmøkel J.S., Sohn E., Bienk K., Schaffert D., Sørensen E.S., et al. An Albumin-Oligonucleotide Assembly for Potential Combinatorial Drug Delivery and Half-Life Extension Applications. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2017;9:284–293. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wienkers L.C., Heath T.G. Predicting in vivo drug interactions from in vitro drug discovery data. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005;4:825–833. doi: 10.1038/nrd1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zheng Y.F., Bae S.H., Huang Z., Chae S.U., Jo S.J., Shim H.J., Lee C.B., Kim D., Yoo H., Bae S.K. Lack of Correlation between In Vitro and In Vivo Studies on the Inhibitory Effects of (‒)-Sophoranone on CYP2C9 is Attributable to Low Oral Absorption and Extensive Plasma Protein Binding of (‒)-Sophoranone. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12 doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12040328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bowman C.M., Benet L.Z. In Vitro-In Vivo Inaccuracy: The CYP3A4 Anomaly. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2019;47:1368–1371. doi: 10.1124/dmd.119.088427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Obrezanova O., Martinsson A., Whitehead T., Mahmoud S., Bender A., Miljković F., Grabowski P., Irwin B., Oprisiu I., Conduit G., et al. Prediction of In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Time-Exposure Curves in Rats Using Machine Learning from the Chemical Structure. Mol. Pharm. 2022;19:1488–1504. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Saeidnia S., Manayi A., Abdollahi M. From in vitro Experiments to in vivo and Clinical Studies; Pros and Cons. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2015;12:218–224. doi: 10.2174/1570163813666160114093140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pardridge W.M., Triguero D., Yang J., Cancilla P.A. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo models of drug transcytosis through the blood-brain barrier. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therapeut. 1990;253:884–891. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gomes C.M., Abrunhosa A.J., Ramos P., Pauwels E.K.J. Molecular imaging with SPECT as a tool for drug development. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2011;63:547–554. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pérez-Medina C., Teunissen A.J.P., Kluza E., Mulder W.J.M., van der Meel R. Nuclear imaging approaches facilitating nanomedicine translation. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020;154–155:123–141. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xia W., Singh N., Goel S., Shi S. Molecular imaging of innate immunity and immunotherapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2023;198 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Figueiredo J., Lopes-Nunes J., Carvalho J., Antunes F., Ribeiro M., Campello M.P.C., Paulo A., Paiva A., Salgado G.F., Queiroz J.A., et al. AS1411 derivatives as carriers of G-quadruplex ligands for cervical cancer cells. Int. J. Pharm. 2019;568 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khademi Z., Lavaee P., Ramezani M., Alibolandi M., Abnous K., Taghdisi S.M. Co-delivery of doxorubicin and aptamer against Forkhead box M1 using chitosan-gold nanoparticles coated with nucleolin aptamer for synergistic treatment of cancer cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;248 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Waaijer S.J.H., Kok I.C., Eisses B., Schröder C.P., Jalving M., Brouwers A.H., Lub-de Hooge M.N., de Vries E.G.E. Molecular Imaging in Cancer Drug Development. J. Nucl. Med. 2018;59:726–732. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.188045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Willmann J.K., van Bruggen N., Dinkelborg L.M., Gambhir S.S. Molecular imaging in drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008;7:591–607. doi: 10.1038/nrd2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sarmento-Ribeiro A.B., Scorilas A., Gonçalves A.C., Efferth T., Trougakos I.P. The emergence of drug resistance to targeted cancer therapies: Clinical evidence. Drug Resist. Updates. 2019;47 doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2019.100646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Min H.-Y., Lee H.-Y. Molecular targeted therapy for anticancer treatment. Exp. Mol. Med. 2022;54:1670–1694. doi: 10.1038/s12276-022-00864-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Andersen J.T., Dalhus B., Cameron J., Daba M.B., Plumridge A., Evans L., Brennan S.O., Gunnarsen K.S., Bjørås M., Sleep D., Sandlie I. Structure-based mutagenesis reveals the albumin-binding site of the neonatal Fc receptor. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:610. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ni S., Zhuo Z., Pan Y., Yu Y., Li F., Liu J., Wang L., Wu X., Li D., Wan Y., et al. Recent Progress in Aptamer Discoveries and Modifications for Therapeutic Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13:9500–9519. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c05750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ding Y., Han Y., Wang R., Wang Y., Chi C., Zhao Z., Zhang H., Wang W., Yin L., Zhou J. Rerouting Native HDL to Predetermined Receptors for Improved Tumor-Targeted Gene Silencing Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:30488–30501. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b10047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.An S., Zhang D., Zhang Y., Wang C., Shi L., Wei W., Huang G., Liu J. GPC3-targeted immunoPET imaging of hepatocellular carcinomas. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 2022;49:2682–2692. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05723-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hu B., Liu T., Li L., Shi L., Yao M., Li C., Ma X., Zhu H., Jia B., Wang F. IgG-Binding Nanobody Capable of Prolonging Nanobody-Based Radiotracer Plasma Half-Life and Enhancing the Efficacy of Tumor-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy. Bioconjug. Chem. 2022;33:1328–1339. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.2c00209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hu G., Zhu W., Liu Y., Wang Y., Zhang Z., Zhu S., Duan W., Zhou P., Fu C., Li F., Huo L. Development and comparison of three 89Zr-labeled anti-CLDN18.2 antibodies to noninvasively evaluate CLDN18.2 expression in gastric cancer: a preclinical study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 2022;49:2634–2644. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05739-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kwak G., Kim H., Park J., Kim E.H., Jang H., Han G., Wang S.Y., Yang Y., Chan Kwon I., Kim S.H. A Trojan-Horse Strategy by In Situ Piggybacking onto Endogenous Albumin for Tumor-Specific Neutralization of Oncogenic MicroRNA. ACS Nano. 2021;15:11369–11384. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c00799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tan H., Su W., Zhang W., Zhang J., Sattler M., Zou P. Albumin-binding domain extends half-life of glucagon-like peptide-1. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021;890 doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bai J.-W., Qiu S.-Q., Zhang G.-J. Molecular and functional imaging in cancer-targeted therapy: current applications and future directions. Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 2023;8:89. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01366-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Maor Y., Malnick S. Liver injury induced by anticancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Int. J. Hepatol. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/815105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mangeat T., Gracia M., Pichard A., Poty S., Martineau P., Robert B., Deshayes E. Fc-engineered monoclonal antibodies to reduce off-target liver uptake. EJNMMI Res. 2023;13:81. doi: 10.1186/s13550-023-01030-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Miyauchi S., Kim S.-J., Lee W., Sugiyama Y. Consideration of albumin-mediated hepatic uptake for highly protein-bound anionic drugs: Bridging the gap of hepatic uptake clearance between in vitro and in vivo. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022;229 doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Figures S1–S9 and Table S1
mmc1.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (5.8MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed in this study are available upon reasonable request.


Articles from Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy

RESOURCES