Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2025 Feb 26;2025:10.17912/micropub.biology.001521. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.001521

Transcription Regulatory Protein SIN3 (YOL004W) Influences Mutation Rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Alexandra Eftimie 1,2, Damon Meyer 2,§
Reviewed by: Jill Keeney
PMCID: PMC11904613  PMID: 40083394

Abstract

SIN3 (YOL004W) codes for a protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae which is suggested to function as a broad cellular transcription regulator through the binding of histone deacetylases and other enzymes to form a large protein complex that modifies chromatin. In addition, SIN3 has also demonstrated potential roles in epigenetic silencing, DNA methylation, and centromere function. Here we report a new role of SIN3 in affecting mutation rates within the CAN1 reporter gene, suggesting an impact on genome stability.


Figure 1. CAN1 forward mutation rate is significantly decreased in sin3Δ single mutants compared to wildtype .


Figure 1.
CAN1 
forward mutation rate is significantly decreased in
sin3Δ
single mutants compared to wildtype

A minimum of 15 wildtype and sin3Δ single colonies were examined to determine the mutation rate within CAN1 . The median, 95% confidence interval, and p-value following a student t-test were calculated. Fold difference between genotypes is shown.

Description

Exploring the various functions of genes and uncharacterized open reading frames in the budding yeast, S. cerevisia e, is an important step in unraveling the biological processes that govern not only yeast but more complex organisms (Vanderwaeren et al., 2022; Bowling et al. 2016). However, while the function of many proteins within S. cerevisiae have been verified, the examination of uncharacterized or understudied genes in the literature has been declining (Tantoso et al., 2023). Related to this, discovery of new activities for gene products (RNA or protein) is difficult if the activity is not closely related to any known function of the RNA or protein. Therefore, we attempted to uncover genes within S. cerevisiae which may have a role in genome stability by screening the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) for genes that are involved in DNA replication, meiosis, or decreased resistance to genotoxins. One such gene identified was SIN3 , a conserved multifunctional regulator involved in chromatin modification and transcriptional regulation, exhibiting both corepressor and transcriptional stimulation capabilities through its association with a histone deacetylase complex (Silverstein & Ekwall, 2005; Adams et al., 2018). SIN3 encodes a 175-kDa polypeptide which functions to negatively regulate the yeast HO gene, thereby determining the mating type pattern of S. cerevisiae , facilitate telomere folding structure, affects sensitivity to genotoxic agents, influence tri-nucleotide expansion, and a moderate sensitivity to UV radiation (Sternberg et al., 1987; Wang et al., 1990; Wagner et al., 2020; Westmoreland et al., 2009; Debacker et al. 2012; Hanway et al., 2002). These phenotypes suggest that Sin3 influences several processes within the cell, some of which impact DNA stability.

To further establish the biological function of Sin3 in maintaining genome stability, the CAN1 forward mutation rate was evaluated in sin3 Δ knockout mutants compared to wildtype (WT). The CAN1 locus has been used as a proxy for genome mutation rates in S. cerevisiae since can1 mutations are easily detected by colony growth on medium containing canavanine which also lacks arginine (Whelan et al., 1979). This includes examination of individual genes required for mutation accumulation and large-scale genome wide screens to identify previously unknown genes that contribute to mutations (Huang, et al., 2003; Novarina et al., 2020). We observed a significantly reduced spontaneous CAN1 mutation rate of approximately 7.4-fold in sin3 Δ knockout mutants in comparison to WT colonies, with the median colony counts being 2.1 x 10 -7 and 1.55 x 10 -6 respectively (p < 0.05). This data indicates that Sin3 plays a role in overall genome stability by influencing spontaneous mutation rates. However, it is not clear what known function of Sin3 may facilitate the increase in mutations. Previous evidence has shown a link between chromosome organization and genome landscape with varying mutation rates (Makova & Hardison, 2015). Sin3 is known to interact with histone deacetylase complexes, which influence gene expression patterns through histone modification and are typically deregulated in human cancers (Ropero & Esteller, 2007). In addition, histone deacetylase complex activity in humans and yeast have been demonstrated to favor trinucleotide repeat expansion while also promoting homology-directed repair (Lahue & Frizzell, 2012). This suggests that Sin3 may indirectly influence mutation rates through its role in chromosome modification and regulation of gene expression. Alternatively, we cannot rule out the possibility that Sin3 possesses a yet unknown function which more directly impacts mutation rates and thereby genome stability.

Methods

CAN1 Forward Mutation Assay

The CAN1 mutation rate for wildtype and sin3 Δ deletion mutations were determined from a minimum of fifteen individual freshly grown colonies for each genotype. Each colony was dispersed in 1 mL of sterile water and 0.2 mL was plated onto synthetic medium lacking arginine containing 60 ug/mL of canavanine. In addition, a dilution of the dispersed colony was plated onto YPD medium to determine the total viable cells within the colony. All cells plated were grown for 3 days at 30 ο C. The median rate of CAN1 mutation was calculated by dividing the number of Can R colonies by the number of viable cells plated for each spore colony (Lea & Coulson, 1949). A 95% confidence interval was calculated for each genotype.

Reagents

Yeast strains used in this study:

Number Genotype Source

ORF1 MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 Horizon Discovery

ORF35 MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 sin3::KANMX Horizon Discovery

Acknowledgments

The authors thank California Northstate University, College of Health Sciences for its financial support and for providing the necessary tools to complete this research. CNU extends appreciation to the Yeast ORFan Project (https://www.yeastorfanproject.com/) for providing respective yeast strains.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by California Northstate University, College of Health Sciences.

References

  1. Adams Grace E., Chandru Aditya, Cowley Shaun M. Co-repressor, co-activator and general transcription factor: the many faces of the Sin3 histone deacetylase (HDAC) complex. Biochemical Journal. 2018 Dec 14;475(24):3921–3932. doi: 10.1042/bcj20170314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowling Bethany V., Schultheis Patrick J., Strome Erin D. Implementation and assessment of a yeast orphan gene research project: involving undergraduates in authentic research experiences and progressing our understanding of uncharacterized open reading frames. Yeast. 2015 Nov 10;33(2):43–53. doi: 10.1002/yea.3139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Debacker Kim, Frizzell Aisling, Gleeson Olive, Kirkham-McCarthy Lucy, Mertz Tony, Lahue Robert S. Histone Deacetylase Complexes Promote Trinucleotide Repeat Expansions. PLoS Biology. 2012 Feb 21;10(2):e1001257–e1001257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hanway Denise, Chin Jodie K., Xia Gang, Oshiro Guy, Winzeler Elizabeth A., Romesberg Floyd E. Previously uncharacterized genes in the UV- and MMS-induced DNA damage response in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002 Jul 29;99(16):10605–10610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152264899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang Meng-Er, Rio Anne-Gaëlle, Nicolas Alain, Kolodner Richard D. A genomewide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that suppress the accumulation of mutations . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003 Sep 12;100(20):11529–11534. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2035018100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lahue Robert S., Frizzell Aisling. Histone deacetylase complexes as caretakers of genome stability. Epigenetics. 2012 Aug 18;7(8):806–810. doi: 10.4161/epi.20922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lea D. E., Coulson C. A. The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. Journal of Genetics. 1949 Dec 1;49(3):264–285. doi: 10.1007/bf02986080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Makova Kateryna D., Hardison Ross C. The effects of chromatin organization on variation in mutation rates in the genome. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2015 Mar 3;16(4):213–223. doi: 10.1038/nrg3890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Novarina Daniele, Janssens Georges E., Bokern Koen, Schut Tim, van Oerle Noor C., Kazemier Hinke G., Veenhoff Liesbeth M., Chang Michael. A genome‐wide screen identifies genes that suppress the accumulation of spontaneous mutations in young and aged yeast cells. Aging Cell. 2019 Dec 18;19(2) doi: 10.1111/acel.13084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ropero Santiago, Esteller Manel. The role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in human cancer. Molecular Oncology. 2007 Mar 7;1(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Silverstein Rebecca A., Ekwall Karl. Sin3: a flexible regulator of global gene expression and genome stability. Current Genetics. 2004 Nov 23;47(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00294-004-0541-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. STERNBERG P. Activation of the yeast HO gene by release from multiple negative controls. Cell. 1987 Feb 1;48(4):567–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90235-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tantoso Erwin, Eisenhaber Birgit, Sinha Swati, Jensen Lars Juhl, Eisenhaber Frank. Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? Biology Direct. 2023 Aug 14;18(1) doi: 10.1186/s13062-023-00403-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vanderwaeren Laura, Dok Rüveyda, Voordeckers Karin, Nuyts Sandra, Verstrepen Kevin J. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Model System for Eukaryotic Cell Biology, from Cell Cycle Control to DNA Damage Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022 Oct 1;23(19):11665–11665. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wagner Tina, Pérez-Martínez Lara, Schellhaas René, Barrientos-Moreno Marta, Öztürk Merve, Prado Félix, Butter Falk, Luke Brian. Chromatin modifiers and recombination factors promote a telomere fold-back structure, that is lost during replicative senescence. PLOS Genetics. 2020 Dec 28;16(12):e1008603–e1008603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang Huaming, Clark Ira, Nicholson Pamela R., Herskowitz Ira, Stillman David J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN3 Gene, a Negative Regulator of HO , Contains Four Paired Amphipathic Helix Motifs . Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1990 Nov 1;10(11):5927–5936. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5927-5936.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Westmoreland, T. J., Wickramasekara, S. M., Guo, A. Y., Selim, A. L., Winsor, T. S., Greenleaf, A. L., Blackwell, K. L., Olson, J. A., Jr, Marks, J. R., & Bennett, C. B. (2009). Comparative genome-wide screening identifies a conserved doxorubicin repair network that is diploid specific in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PloS one, 4(6), e5830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Whelan William L, Gocke Elmar, Manney Thomas R. THE CAN1 LOCUS OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE : FINE-STRUCTURE ANALYSIS AND FORWARD MUTATION RATES . Genetics. 1979 Jan 10;91(1):35–51. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES