Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1989 May;412:245–266. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017613

Mechanically evoked responses of afferent fibres innervating the guinea-pig's ureter: an in vitro study.

F Cervero 1, H Sann 1
PMCID: PMC1190573  PMID: 2600832

Abstract

1. Electrophysiological recordings from ureteric mechanosensitive afferent fibres were performed using an in vitro preparation of the guinea-pig ureter and associated nerves. Single-unit recordings were obtained from small ureteric nerves arising from the inferior mesenteric ganglion, the hypogastric nerve or the pelvic plexus. The fibre composition of these ureteric nerves was also examined by electron microscopy. 2. In two ureteric nerve bundles, which were taken as representative of the maximal and minimal size of nerves used in the electrophysiological recordings, the number of nerve fibres was found to be 417 and 48, respectively. In the bigger nerve 12% of the fibres were small myelinated and the rest unmyelinated. The smaller nerve consisted of unmyelinated fibres only. 3. Electrophysiological recordings were made from sixty-seven mechanosensitive afferent fibres. The conduction velocities (CV) of forty-two of them were determined and all were found to be in the C fibre range (mean CV, 0.4 m/s). Of 119 additional fibres which were not further characterized 112 were C fibres (mean CV, 0.51 m/s) and seven were A delta fibres (mean CV, 3.78 m/s). 4. Mechanosensitive units were classified into two groups according to their ability to respond to contractions of the ureter: (i) U-1 units (9% of all mechanosensitive units) responded to contractions of the ureter and did not show on-going activity or after-discharges to mechanical stimulation. They had low thresholds to intraluminal distension (mean, 8 mmHg) and responded with a short latency to pressure stimuli. (ii) U-2 units (91% of all mechanosensitive units) did not respond to contractions of the ureter, had spontaneous activity between 0 and 2.4 Hz and exhibited after-discharges to mechanical stimuli lasting up to several minutes. They responded after a long latency (greater than 3 s) to distensions in the range of 5-30 mmHg. 5. The level of spontaneous activity and the pressure thresholds of the U-2 units were found to be different depending on whether or not the ureter was perfused intraluminally. Thus U-2 units recorded with intraluminal perfusion had a lower rate of on-going activity and higher threshold to intraluminal distension than U-2 units recorded without intraluminal perfusion. 6. Movement of an intraluminal glass bead under the receptive field of the units evoked strong responses in nine of eleven U-2 units tested as soon as their receptive fields were reached. 7. Our results demonstrate the existence of two classes of mechanosensitive afferent fibres in the guinea-pig ureter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
245

Images in this article

251Fig. 2
on p.251

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews P. L. Vagal afferent innervation of the gastrointestinal tract. Prog Brain Res. 1986;67:65–86. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62757-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bahns E., Ernsberger U., Jänig W., Nelke A. Discharge properties of mechanosensitive afferents supplying the retroperitoneal space. Pflugers Arch. 1986 Nov;407(5):519–525. doi: 10.1007/BF00657510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baron R., Jänig W., McLachlan E. M. The afferent and sympathetic components of the lumbar spinal outflow to the colon and pelvic organs in the cat. I. The hypogastric nerve. J Comp Neurol. 1985 Aug 8;238(2):135–146. doi: 10.1002/cne.902380202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beacham W. S., Kunze D. L. Renal receptors evoking a spinal vasometer reflex. J Physiol. 1969 Mar;201(1):73–85. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blumberg H., Haupt P., Jänig W., Kohler W. Encoding of visceral noxious stimuli in the discharge patterns of visceral afferent fibres from the colon. Pflugers Arch. 1983 Jun;398(1):33–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00584710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bretag A. H. Synthetic interstitial fluid for isolated mammalian tissue. Life Sci. 1969 Mar 1;8(5):319–329. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(69)90283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cervero F. Afferent activity evoked by natural stimulation of the biliary system in the ferret. Pain. 1982 Jun;13(2):137–151. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90024-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cervero F., Sharkey K. A. An electrophysiological and anatomical study of intestinal afferent fibres in the rat. J Physiol. 1988 Jul;401:381–397. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cottrell D. F., Iggo A. Mucosal enteroceptors with vagal afferent fibres in the proximal duodenum of sheep. J Physiol. 1984 Sep;354:497–522. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dixon J. S., Gosling J. A. Histochemical and electron microscopic observations on the innervation of the upper segment of the mammalian ureter. J Anat. 1971 Oct;110(Pt 1):57–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Duclaux R., Mei N., Ranieri F. Conduction velocity along the afferent vagal dendrites: a new type of fibre. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(2):487–495. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Floyd K., Hick V. E., Morrison J. F. Mechanosensitive afferent units in the hypogastric nerve of the cat. J Physiol. 1976 Jul;259(2):457–471. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Giamberardino M. A., Rampin O., Laplace J. P., Vecchiet L., Albe-Fessard D. Muscular hyperalgesia and hypoalgesia after stimulation of the ureter in rats. Neurosci Lett. 1988 Apr 22;87(1-2):29–34. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(88)90140-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haupt P., Jänig W., Kohler W. Response pattern of visceral afferent fibres, supplying the colon, upon chemical and mechanical stimuli. Pflugers Arch. 1983 Jun;398(1):41–47. doi: 10.1007/BF00584711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holzer P., Bucsics A., Lembeck F. Distribution of capsaicin-sensitive nerve fibres containing immunoreactive substance P in cutaneous and visceral tissues of the rat. Neurosci Lett. 1982 Aug 31;31(3):253–257. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(82)90029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hua X. Y. Tachykinins and calcitonin gene-related peptide in relation to peripheral functions of capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1986;551:1–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hulsebosch C. E., Coggeshall R. E. An analysis of the axon populations in the nerves to the pelvic viscera in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1982 Oct 10;211(1):1–10. doi: 10.1002/cne.902110102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. IGGO A. Tension receptors in the stomach and the urinary bladder. J Physiol. 1955 Jun 28;128(3):593–607. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Iggo A., Kornhuber H. H. A quantitative study of C-mechanoreceptors in hairy skin of the cat. J Physiol. 1977 Oct;271(2):549–565. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jänig W., Morrison J. F. Functional properties of spinal visceral afferents supplying abdominal and pelvic organs, with special emphasis on visceral nociception. Prog Brain Res. 1986;67:87–114. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62758-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumazawa T., Mizumura K. Mechanical and thermal responses of polymodal receptors recorded from the superior spermatic nerve of dogs. J Physiol. 1980 Feb;299:233–245. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maggi C. A., Meli A. The sensory-efferent function of capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons. Gen Pharmacol. 1988;19(1):1–43. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(88)90002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McLachlan E. M. The components of the hypogastric nerve in male and female guinea pigs. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1985 Aug;13(4):327–342. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(85)90021-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Michaelson G. Percutaneous puncture of the renal pelvis, intrapelvic pressure and the concentrating capacity of the kidney in hydronephrosis. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1974;559:1–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Notley R. G. The innervation of the upper ureter in man and in the rat: an ultrastructural study. J Anat. 1969 Sep;105(Pt 2):393–402. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rose J. G., Gillenwater J. Y. Pathophysiology of ureteral obstruction. Am J Physiol. 1973 Oct;225(4):830–837. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1973.225.4.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sann H., Cervero F. Afferent innervation of the guinea-pig's ureter. Agents Actions. 1988 Dec;25(3-4):243–245. doi: 10.1007/BF01965024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wharton J., Polak J. M., Probert L., De Mey J., McGregor G. P., Bryant M. G., Bloom S. R. Peptide containing nerves in the ureter of the guinea-pig and cat. Neuroscience. 1981;6(5):969–982. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(81)90178-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES