Skip to main content
Frontiers in Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Medicine
. 2025 Feb 28;12:1509884. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1509884

Comprehensive treatment of diabetic endothelial dysfunction based on pathophysiological mechanism

Zhao Liu 1,2, Jun Lu 1, Wenjun Sha 1, Tao Lei 1,*
PMCID: PMC11906411  PMID: 40093018

Abstract

Vascular endothelium is integral to the regulation of vascular homeostasis and maintenance of normal arterial function in healthy individuals. Endothelial dysfunction is a significant contributor to the advancement of atherosclerosis, which can precipitate cardiovascular complications. A notable correlation exists between diabetes and endothelial dysfunction, wherein chronic hyperglycemia and acute fluctuations in glucose levels exacerbate oxidative stress. This results in diminished nitric oxide synthesis and heightened production of endothelin-1, ultimately leading to endothelial impairment. In clinical settings, it is imperative to implement appropriate therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing endothelial function to prevent and manage diabetes-associated vascular complications. Various antidiabetic agents, including insulin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), and metformin, are effective in mitigating blood glucose variability and improving insulin sensitivity by lowering postprandial glucose levels. Additionally, traditional Chinese medicinal compounds, such as turmeric extract, resveratrol, matrine alkaloids, tanshinone, puerarin, tanshinol, paeonol, astragaloside, berberine, and quercetin, exhibit hypoglycemic properties and enhance vascular function through diverse mechanisms. Consequently, larger randomized controlled trials involving both pharmacological and herbal interventions are essential to elucidate their impact on endothelial dysfunction in patients with diabetes. This article aims to explore a comprehensive approach to the treatment of diabetic endothelial dysfunction based on an understanding of its pathophysiology.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, insulin resistance, antidiabetic agents, traditional Chinese medicine

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent endocrine disorder characterized by a complex syndrome of metabolic dysregulation, primarily manifested as hyperglycemia owing to inadequate insulin secretion or impaired insulin action (1). The global burden of diabetes is significant, with a pooled analysis indicating an increasing prevalence among adults worldwide. According to the Diabetes Federation, the number of adults diagnosed with diabetes increased from 108 million in 1980 to 463 million in 2019 (2). Individuals with diabetes are at elevated risk of both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the predominant contributors to morbidity and mortality in this population (3). Microvascular complications including neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy significantly impair the quality of life of patients with DM. Conversely, macrovascular complications such as coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease are the leading causes of mortality among diabetic individuals. A systematic review indicated that CVDs affect approximately 32.2% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are affected by CVDs. Among T2DM patients with a mean age of 63.6 ± 6.9 years, 9.9% succumbed to CVDs, which accounted for 50.3% of all diabetes-related deaths (4). Endothelial dysfunction has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying diabetes and CVDs (5). It is essential to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms linking these factors in order to inform therapeutic strategies. Consequently, this review aimed to investigate the comprehensive management of diabetic endothelial dysfunction, grounded in the pathophysiological interplay between DM and endothelial function.

Retrieval strategy and method

PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched for studies related to endothelial dysfunction in DM. The search terms included diabetes mellitus, DM, endothelial dysfunction, hypoglycemic agents, antidiabetic agents, and traditional Chinese medicine. The first 172 articles were retrieved and included, of which 42 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 were systematic reviews. Other studies include literature reviews, guidelines, and other non-RCT types of experimental and clinical studies.

What is vascular endothelial function?

To understand endothelial dysfunction, it is essential to first delineate the concept of endothelial function. Human blood vessels are structured in three distinct layers: the vascular endothelium (intima), smooth muscle cells (media), and surrounding elastic and connective tissue (adventitia). The vascular endothelium, which constitutes the innermost layer of the blood vessels, functions as an endocrine organ that secretes a diverse array of vasoactive substances. Upon stimulation with acetylcholine (ACH), endothelial cells release endothelium-derived contracting factors (EDRF) (6), which are ultimately identified as nitric oxide (NO) (7). Subsequent research has demonstrated that NO plays a critical role in regulating various physiological and pathophysiological processes, including neurotransmitter transmission, male erectile function, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses (8). In addition to NO, endothelial cells are capable of synthesizing and releasing prostacyclin (PGI2) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors (EDHFs), both of which are significant EDRFs that modulate vascular tension (9). Endothelium-derived contractile factors encompass superoxide anion, endothelin-1 (ET-1), prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α), and thromboxane A2 (TXA2) (9). Furthermore, the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) serves as a crucial mechanism for regulating vascular tension owing to the high expression of angiotensin receptors in both endothelial and smooth muscle cells (10). Under normal physiological conditions, vascular tension is maintained by a balance between vasodilatory and vasoconstrictive factors. Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by the inability of endothelial cells to sustain vascular homeostasis, resulting from an imbalance between proatherogenic and antiatherogenic factors derived from the endothelium. This imbalance favors atherogenic factors, thereby contributing to the onset and progression of atherosclerosis. NO released from the endothelium exerts numerous anti-atherosclerotic effects, including vasodilation, inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, and suppression of leukocyte and platelet adhesion and aggregation. Consequently, endothelial dysfunction is typically associated with an increase in NO inactivation or a decrease in NO production by the endothelium, leading to the diminished bioavailability of NO.

Morbidity mechanism of endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus

DM is associated with endothelial dysfunction, as evidenced by various studies (1113). Clinical investigations have revealed a reduction in endothelial function, evaluated through endothelium-dependent vasodilation, in individuals diagnosed with DM (14, 15). Prior research indicates that the primary contributors to endothelial dysfunction in DM are oxidative stress and inflammation, with significant disruptions occurring in the NO production and activation pathways (16). Although the precise mechanisms underlying the development of endothelial dysfunction in DM remain incompletely understood, existing studies have identified several potential mechanisms that elucidate the relationship between DM and endothelial dysfunction, as summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1.

Table 1.

Morbidity mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in DM.

Morbidity mechanism Specific description References
Oxidative stress The relationship between endothelial function and oxidative stress is significant, with insulin exerting its effects on the endothelium via the Ras-MAPK and PI3K-Akt-eNOS signaling pathways. In instances of insulin resistance, these pathways become impaired, leading to vascular endothelial dysfunction and the development of diabetic complications. (1625)
Selective insulin resistance In the context of T2DM-associated insulin resistance, there exists a specific impairment in the PI-3 K signaling pathway. This defect contributes to the development of hyperinsulinemia, which in turn enhances the activation of MAPK signaling. (2632)
Inflammation The correlation between insulin resistance and inflammation suggests that inflammation negatively impacts the PI-3 K/Akt signaling pathway responsible for NO production, leading to a decrease in NO bioavailability. This diminished availability of NO may undermine its substantial anti-inflammatory properties, consequently intensifying the development of inflammatory atherosclerotic lesions. (3343)
Chronic hyperglycemia Chronic hyperglycemia, a defining characteristic of DM, is believed to play a significant role in the development of endothelial dysfunction through four primary mechanisms: the activation of PKC, the stimulation of the hexosamine and polyol pathways, and the formation of AGEs. (4447)
Acute glucose Cellular metabolic adaptation to the toxic effects induced by elevated glucose levels may be enhanced by sustained high glucose concentrations, which create a continuous feedback mechanism. Conversely, intermittent exposure to high glucose may hinder the ability of cells to adapt to these toxic effects. In the absence of this continuous feedback, hyperglycemia can result in toxic consequences, characterized by increased oxidative stress and subsequent endothelial dysfunction. (4855)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Morbidity mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in DM.

Oxidative stress

The vascular endothelium exhibits heightened sensitivity to fluctuations in systemic glucose levels, which distinguishes it from other tissues and cells that remain unaffected by such abnormalities. Consequently, the vascular endothelium may serve as a primary target for the detrimental effects of hyperglycemia (17). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated from molecular oxygen play a significant role in this context. Oxidative stress arises when there is an imbalance between the antioxidant defence system and ROS, favoring the latter. When the capacity of antioxidant systems to counteract ROS is inadequate, the harmful consequences of ROS become evident, including the disruption of signaling pathways and normal cellular functions through damage to cellular lipids, proteins, or DNA (18). Oxidative stress has emerged as a critical factor that contributes to vascular endothelial dysfunction, particularly in the context of chronic diseases and aging. There exists a reciprocal relationship between endothelial function and oxidative stress (19, 20).

ROS encompasses both radical species, such as the superoxide anion radical (O2•−), peroxy radicals, alkoxy radicals, and hydroxyl radicals, as well as non-radical species, including singlet molecular oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, organic hydroperoxides, hypochlorous acid, and ozone (20). The superoxide anion radical (O2•−) is generated by the removal of an electron from molecular oxygen and has a high affinity for NO, thereby diminishing its bioavailability. Furthermore, the direct interaction between NO and O2•− (21) results in the formation of pernitrite, a potent oxidant that can induce lipid peroxidation, multi-step tyrosine nitration, DNA damage, and ultimately, cell death (21). Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a crucial cofactor for endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), can be oxidized to its inactive form by peroxynitrite, leading to a reduction in BH4 availability. In instances of insufficient BH4, uncoupled eNOS generates O2•− instead of NO (22), thereby establishing a close association between O2•− and the progression of endothelial dysfunction. Once oxidative stress is established, endothelial function is perpetually compromised via a self-reinforcing cycle of increased O2•− production.

Research indicates that elevated levels of free radicals can adversely affect the morphology and functionality of tissue membranes, contributing to the development of complications associated with DM (16). The primary mechanism underlying endothelial dysfunction (2325) involves the uncoupling of ROS generated by xanthine oxidase (XO), cyclooxygenase (COX), and eNOS, which elevates ROS levels and leads to the inactivation of NO. Insulin plays a regulatory role in endothelial function by modulating protein kinase activity, NO production, and vasodilation through the Ras-MAPK and PI3K-Akt-eNOS signaling pathways. However, the onset of insulin resistance disrupts these pathways, resulting in vascular endothelial dysfunction and the manifestation of DM-related lesions.

Selective insulin resistance

Beyond its function in glucose regulation, insulin resistance triggers intracellular signaling pathways that are essential for preserving endothelial health, with the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI-3 K)/Akt pathway being the most protective against vascular damage (26, 27). Conversely, activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway enhances the expression of ET-1, resulting in detrimental effects on cellular proliferation (28). Under normal physiological conditions, the PI-3 K pathway is predominant in the regulation of vasomotor control (29). However, it is widely recognized that in the context of insulin resistance associated with T2DM, there exists selective impairment of the PI-3 K pathway, which remains unaffected by signaling through the MAPK pathway (30, 31). Furthermore, this selective resistance contributes to hyperinsulinemia, which in turn activates MAPK signaling (32).

Inflammation

T2DM is characterized by a persistent systemic inflammatory state, with elevated levels of circulating inflammatory markers frequently observed in individuals with diabetes and obesity (33, 34). Vascular inflammation encompasses various cellular components, including inflammatory cells (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and macrophages), endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and extracellular matrix (ECM). In blood vessels, acute inflammation is marked by vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, and blood stasis. Alterations in the cytoskeleton of endothelial cells (ECs) lead to disruption of intercellular junctions, thereby enhancing vascular permeability. When ECs are subjected to a chronic inflammatory response induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), they can activate inflammatory cells, such as monocytes and T lymphocytes, prompting their chemotaxis, adhesion, and infiltration into the arterial intima, where they differentiate into macrophages. These macrophages subsequently engulf lipoproteins, resulting in the formation of foam cells that contribute to plaque development. The upregulation of adhesion molecules, including selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), facilitates the adhesion of inflammatory cells to monocytes and promotes the recruitment of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages along with the release of additional cytokines. This cascade of events leads to ECM deposition, granulation tissue formation, connective tissue proliferation, increased cell adhesion, heightened permeability, and apoptosis, ultimately resulting in vasculopathy (35).

The levels of Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) are elevated in individuals with T2DM, contributing to the development of insulin resistance. The presence of AGEs, along with insulin resistance, can activate the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), a nuclear transcription factor. NF-κB, along with phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI-3 K), p38 MAPK, and other signaling molecules, mediates intracellular signaling pathways that promote the release of various inflammatory cytokines, leading to endothelial cell dysfunction (36, 37).

Research utilizing obese animal models has demonstrated that adipose tissue serves as a source of inflammatory cytokines, which correlates with elevated plasma levels of TNF-α (38, 39). TNF-α is known to activate NF-κB (40). Additionally, NF-κB can be activated by free fatty acids and the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), both of which are prevalent in the diabetic milieu. Notably, obese mice with mutations that render the TNF-α gene inactive exhibit a marked increase in insulin sensitivity (41). This suggests that prolonged activation of NF-κB within cells positions it as a primary responder to various inflammatory stimuli.

The relationship between insulin resistance and inflammation indicates that inflammation negatively impacts the PI-3 K/Akt signaling pathway, which is responsible for the production of NO, ultimately leading to a decrease in NO bioavailability (42). Furthermore, the exposure of cultured ECs to TNF-α has been shown to impair the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) (43). Consequently, the diminished availability of NO may undermine its anti-inflammatory properties, thereby exacerbating the development of inflammatory atherosclerotic lesions.

Chronic hyperglycemia

Chronic hyperglycemia, a defining characteristic of DM, is believed to play a significant role in the development of endothelial dysfunction through four primary mechanisms: activation of protein kinase C (PKC), stimulation of the hexosamine and polyol pathways, and formation of AGEs (44, 45).

Intracellular oxygen is predominantly generated by mitochondria (46). Pyruvate, which is synthesized in the cytoplasm through glycolysis, is subsequently utilized in mitochondria to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via oxidative phosphorylation. Following its synthesis, pyruvate is transported into the mitochondria where it undergoes oxidation to yield water (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FADH2) through the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (44). The electrons derived from mitochondrial NADH and FADH2 are utilized by the electron transport chain located on the inner mitochondrial membrane, which serves as the energy source for ATP synthesis. During this process, electrons are transferred through the mitochondrial electron transport chain, which concurrently facilitates proton pumping from the mitochondrial matrix into the intermembrane space. This proton pumping generates a proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane, thereby promoting enhanced transport of NADH and FADH2 into the electron transport chain. Given that NADH and FADH2 function as electron donors, electron transfer and proton pumping through the electron transport chain are augmented, resulting in an increased proton gradient across the mitochondrial inner membrane. Consequently, the electron gradient and proton pumping mechanisms may be inhibited, leading to an increase in electron leakage from the electron transport chain, and subsequently, an increase in oxygen production within the mitochondria (44).

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is a critical enzyme involved in the glycolytic pathway and plays a vital role in the regulation of glycolysis. Research indicates that GAPDH activity is partially suppressed due to the excessive generation of mitochondrial superoxide (O2•−) resulting from hyperglycemia. Consequently, the inhibition of GAPDH activity by mitochondrial superoxide contributes to the accumulation of glycolytic intermediates that precede GAPDH, thereby enhancing the flow of these upstream metabolites into the glucose overutilization pathway (44).

Elevated glucose flux through the polyol pathway leads to an increased consumption of NADPH, which is essential for the regeneration of reduced glutathione. Consequently, intracellular levels of reduced glutathione diminish as a result of increased glucose flux, further exacerbating NADPH consumption. Given that reduced glutathione serves as the primary intracellular antioxidant, this reduction contributes to an increase in oxidative stress within the cell, ultimately resulting in endothelial dysfunction.

Elevated glucose flux in the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway may contribute to endothelial dysfunction. In this pathway, fructose-6-phosphate is enzymatically converted to glucosamine-6-phosphate, which subsequently leads to an increase in UDP-N-acetylglucosamine. This metabolite is essential for various biochemical processes, including proteoglycan synthesis and O-linked glycoprotein formation. Increased levels of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine facilitate the modification of transcription factors, nuclear proteins, and cytoplasmic proteins through O-linked N-acetylglucosamine, resulting in significant changes in gene expression and protein functionality. An example is the O-acetylglucosaminylation of eNOS at the Akt phosphorylation site, which inhibits eNOS activity (47), thereby leading to a decrease in NO production and subsequent endothelial dysfunction.

Hyperglycemia triggers PKC activation through the elevation of diacylglycerol levels, which subsequently initiates a cascade of pathogenic effects, including a reduction in eNOS expression. This condition is associated with the increased expression of ET-1, increased levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor, augmented expression of transforming growth factor-beta, and activation of NF-κB and NADPH oxidase. Collectively, these alterations contribute to the development of endothelial dysfunction.

The elevated intracellular synthesis of precursors to AGEs leads to alterations in plasma and ECM proteins, in addition to functional modifications of intracellular proteins. The engagement of AGE receptors on ECs triggers the production of ROS and activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), which contributes to endothelial dysfunction. Consequently, endothelial dysfunction is attributed to hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial superoxide (O2•−) production as well as the inhibition of GAPDH activity by mitochondrial O2, resulting in a diversion of glycolytic flux from the conventional glycolytic pathway to an alternative metabolic route.

Acute glucose

Plasma glucose levels in individuals without diabetes are typically regulated within a narrow range, whereas patients with DM experience significant and rapid increases in blood glucose levels during the postprandial period. Both experimental and clinical investigations have demonstrated that acute postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with DM can adversely affect endothelial function by elevating oxidative stress levels (48). Notably, intermittent hyperglycemia may pose a greater risk to ECs than sustained hyperglycemia does. In vitro research indicates that intermittent hyperglycemia leads to a higher rate of endothelial cell apoptosis through the activation of PKC and NADPH oxidase, in contrast to persistent hyperglycemia (49, 50). Furthermore, clinical studies have established a link between glucose fluctuations and impaired endothelial function through oxidative stress mechanisms. Monnier et al. reported a strong correlation between markers of glucose fluctuation and oxidative stress, whereas no significant relationship was found between oxidative stress markers and other glycemic indicators such as fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (51). Additionally, Torimoto et al. (52) found an inverse correlation between glucose fluctuations and endothelial function assessments. These results implied that fluctuations in glucose levels may detrimentally affect endothelial function by increasing oxidative stress. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the relationship between glucose variability and increased oxidative stress remain poorly understood. It has been hypothesized that the metabolic adaptation of cells to the toxic effects of elevated glucose may be enhanced by sustained high glucose concentrations owing to persistent feedback mechanisms. Conversely, intermittent high glucose levels may not promote cellular adaptation to toxic effects associated with elevated glucose levels. In the absence of continuous feedback, hyperglycemia can induce toxic effects resulting in increased oxidative stress and subsequent endothelial dysfunction. While HbA1c is commonly utilized as a therapeutic marker for glycemic control, it primarily reflects average glucose exposure over time rather than fluctuations in glucose levels. Large randomized controlled trials employing HbA1c as a measure of glycemic control have not demonstrated the efficacy of intensive glycemic management in reducing cardiovascular events (5355). Consequently, it is imperative to consider not only HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels but also postprandial glucose levels in efforts to safeguard the endothelium from oxidative damage associated with postprandial hyperglycemia.

The role of epigenetics in endothelial dysfunction in diabetic patients

The mechanisms under discussion indicate that environmental factors, such as hyperglycemia induced by dietary choices, may lead to endothelial dysfunction. It is a common assumption that rectifying these imbalances would result in swift restoration of endothelial function; however, this assumption is misleading. Subsequent research conducted following the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) has introduced the concept of “metabolic memory.” This phenomenon suggests that the effects of prolonged or temporary fluctuations in blood glucose levels can persist long after normalization efforts have been implemented (56). Such findings not only illustrate that intensive glycemic control does not completely reverse the vascular complications associated with preexisting hyperglycemia, but also highlight that the advantages of rigorous therapeutic interventions can persist for many years, even when glycemic control deteriorates to typical suboptimal levels (57, 58). Collectively, these findings imply that DM, particularly hyperglycemia, may induce genetic modifications in the cellular phenotypes. Epigenetic research has elucidated the mechanisms by which gene expression can be influenced, thereby contributing to increased susceptibility to T2DM and CVDs (59). The epigenetic theory is underpinned by three interrelated pathways: histone modification, DNA methylation, and non-coding RNA mechanisms.

Post-translational modifications of histones within chromatin can influence the conformation of DNA, thereby facilitating or obstructing access to particular sites, which, in turn, can enhance or inhibit gene transcription. The regulation of histone modifications is mediated by various enzymes responsible for the addition or removal of these modifications (59). Numerous studies have focused on ECs, revealing that alterations in the expression and activity of these enzymes are linked to complications arising from DM. For instance, specific patterns of histone methylation have been correlated with a chronic inflammatory phenotype in ECs subjected to elevated glucose levels (60).

Altered patterns of DNA methylation have been associated with atherosclerosis (61) and ECs; however, there is a paucity of research on the role of DNA methylation in DM and its vascular complications (62). Covalent methylation of cytosine residues represents a stable modification of DNA that remains intact throughout the experimental procedures, thereby offering a robust foundation for future investigations (63). Similar to histone modifications, DNA methylation can result in persistent alterations in gene expression, which makes it imperative to elucidate the intricate mechanisms involved. Studies have indicated that high-fat diets in obese rats can lead to the hypermethylation of specific genes (64). Consequently, it is plausible to hypothesize that a similar phenomenon may occur in patients with DM, particularly with respect to endothelial function.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short RNA molecules that regulate the expression of various target proteins by promoting mRNA degradation or inhibiting translation. In the context of ECs, in vitro investigations have identified a complex network of miRNAs that significantly influence processes such as proliferation and migration (notably miR-320 (65), miR-503 (66), and miR-221/222 (67, 68)), inflammation (including miR-10a (169) and miR-126 (170)), and angiogenesis (with a specific emphasis on miR-221/222 (69), miR-126 (70), miR-210 (71), and miR-21 (72)).

The miR-200 family, comprising five members, miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-141, and miR-429 (73), plays a significant role in oxidative stress-induced endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular complications associated with DM and obesity (7476). The miRNA family has garnered considerable interest in the fields of biology and medicine because of its involvement in various critical biological processes. Research indicates that the miR-200 family primarily regulates cellular behavior by inhibiting the translation of target genes or facilitating mRNA degradation. Specifically, the miR-200 family is implicated in the regulation of several fundamental cellular processes, including (1) cell proliferation, which governs the cell cycle and influences cellular growth (77); (2) cell differentiation, which directs the maturation of progenitor cells into specialized cell types (78); (3) apoptosis, which is essential for maintaining normal cellular turnover and for the removal of damaged or superfluous cells (79); and (4) epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process that involves alterations in cell morphology and function that are critical for both embryonic development and cancer metastasis (79). The multifunctional characteristics of the miR-200 family make them a promising therapeutic target, particularly in the context of cancer and other diseases characterized by aberrant cell proliferation or transformation.

The miR-200 family, particularly miR-200c, has been implicated in oxidative stress associated with endothelial dysfunction in DM. MiR-200c exerts its effects by directly targeting SIRT1, eNOS, and FOXO1, leading to a reduction in NO levels and an increase in the acetylation of SIRT1 substrates, including FOXO1 and p53. Acetylation of FOXO1 subsequently inhibits its transcriptional activity on genes that are critical for cellular defense against oxidative stress, such as SIRT1 and ROS scavengers, including catalase and manganese superoxide dismutase. This inhibition results in elevated ROS production and promotes phosphorylation of the p66Shc protein at Ser-36, which further enhances ROS levels and suppresses FOXO1 transcription (80). This feedback loop contributes to the exacerbation of oxidative stress and is particularly pronounced under conditions of heightened oxidative stress, such as aging and ischemia, ultimately leading to endothelial dysfunction (81).

Endothelium-dependent NO-mediated vasodilation in individuals with diabetes is influenced by a reduction in both NO synthesis and stability. The presence of excessive ROS diminishes the half-life of NO by converting it to peroxynitrite, thereby resulting in decreased NO levels. Hyperglycemia has been shown to enhances ROS production via NADPH oxidase. Additionally, microRNA-200c (miR-200c) has been implicated in the increased generation of ROS (80), which indirectly compromises vasodilatory function in patients with diabetes, ultimately leading to endothelial dysfunction. Diabetes adversely affects both the quantity and quality of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), resulting in a delayed response of these cells to vascular injury. Furthermore, hyperglycemia can induce dysfunction in circulating angioblasts (CAC) and endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFC), thereby diminishing their migratory, secretory, and angiogenic capabilities. The accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) may also promote apoptosis and impair the migratory, adhesive, and secretory functions of CAC and ECFC cells. miR-200c may exacerbate damage to and repair of the vascular endothelium in diabetic patients by influencing the functionality of these related cell types (80). In summary, miR-200c plays a critical role in the onset and progression of endothelial dysfunction in DM by disrupting regulatory pathways, affecting vasodilation, and impairing cellular repair.

Research has indicated that the effects of miRs can vary significantly under different physiological conditions. For instance, certain miRs are known to have protective and angiogenic effects (70, 71), whereas others exhibit detrimental anti-angiogenic properties (69, 72). Furthermore, it has been suggested that there is a distinct pattern of miRNA dysregulation in DM (82). Specifically, hyperglycemic environments may lead to excessive or insufficient expression of harmful or beneficial miRs, respectively, thereby contributing to vascular complications. An example is the observed upregulation of miR-320 in cardiomyocytes subjected to hyperglycemia, which correlates with diminished cell proliferation and migration (83). In healthy individuals, the levels of miRs in the plasma remain stable and consistent, positioning them as potential biomarkers for diseases such as T2DM (84). miRs may serve not only in monitoring disease progression but also in assessing the risk of future disease onset. Consequently, analyses of plasma from T2DM patients indicate that altered miR levels may play a role in the pathophysiological state of the disease (85). Despite recent progress in the understanding of epigenetic mechanisms related to DM and its complications, numerous questions remain. Additionally, the intricate nature of these interactions presents significant challenges for fully elucidating these mechanisms. (See Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Epigenetic mechanism of diabetes induction.

Treatment of DM from the perspective of endothelial dysfunction

The selection of appropriate interventions to effectively enhance endothelial function is of considerable clinical importance in the management of cardiovascular events in patients with DM. However, the efficacy of commonly prescribed antidiabetic medications in improving endothelial function remains unclear. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a non-invasive, endothelium-dependent method for evaluating endothelial function, typically employing ultrasound to measure alterations in the diameter of the brachial artery during ischemic conditions. An elevated FMD value is indicative of superior vascular elasticity (86). The expert consensus statement from the European Society of Cardiology advocates the utilization of FMD in the investigation of the pathophysiology of CVDs and, when feasible, in the identification of individuals at heightened risk for subsequent cardiovascular events (87). Numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have examined the impact of specific classes of antidiabetic medication on vascular function (8890) (See Table 2).

Table 2.

Effects of hypoglycemic drugs on endothelial function.

Drug category Primary effect Mechanism of action Effectiveness References
GLP-1R agonists Anti-inflammatory, blood glucose reduction Activates AMPK-eNOS pathway, promotes NO production, reduces inflammatory factors High (93105)
Metformin Enhances insulin sensitivity, reduces oxidative stress Activates AMPK, inhibits NF-κB, reduces free radical production High (129137)
Sulfonylureas Increases insulin secretion Stimulates insulin secretion, indirectly improves endothelial function Moderate (106108)
α-Glucosidase inhibitors Reduces glucose fluctuation, lowers oxidative stress Inhibits carbohydrate breakdown, alleviates postprandial hyperglycemia-induced endothelial damage Moderate (123125)
SGLT2 inhibitors Improves glucose fluctuation and metabolic parameters Protects endothelial function by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation High (112122)
TZDs (Thiazolidinediones) Reduces insulin resistance Activates PPARγ pathway, decreases inflammation and oxidative stress Moderate (126128)
DPP-4 inhibitors Improves postprandial glucose fluctuation, partial anti-inflammatory effect Inhibits DPP-4 enzyme activity, extends endogenous GLP-1 action duration Low (99109)

Intensive glycemic control using insulin has been shown to mitigate both microvascular and macrovascular complications in individuals diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (91). In T1DM patients who maintain a healthy energy balance and exhibit no insulin resistance, insulin therapy may enhance vascular endothelial function, as selective insulin resistance is not a relevant factor. Conversely, the impact of insulin therapy on endothelial function in patients with T2DM appears to be contingent on the degree of metabolic control attained (92). Specifically, for obese or overweight T2DM patients experiencing insulin resistance due to overnutrition, the efficacy of insulin therapy on endothelial function is likely influenced by the level of metabolic control achieved by these individuals (92).

The Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) (93) and the Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes with Semaglutide in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN-6) (94) have demonstrated a reduction in the risk of MACE, thereby supporting the cardiovascular benefits associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist therapy. Notably, GLP-1R agonists have been shown to significantly decrease arterial stiffness, as measured by pulse wave velocity (89). In a study conducted by Frías et al. (95), tirzepatide, which functions as a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1R agonist, exhibited a favorable impact on glucose homeostasis and was associated with a relatively rapid and pronounced antihypertensive effect. A subgroup analysis focusing on patients with hypertension in the trial may yield valuable insights. It is posited that the hypotensive effect of tizepatide is not contingent upon insulin regulation, and given that insulin has been shown to stimulate NO production and ET-1 secretion (96), its overall hemodynamic influence on blood pressure is minimal (97). Furthermore, insulin therapy has the potential to induce microcirculatory disturbances (98). A Bayesian network meta-analysis (99) identified GLP-1R agonists as the most effective antidiabetic agents to enhance FMD. Specifically, liraglutide significantly improved FMD in a subgroup of patients without CVDs compared with metformin and sulfonylureas. In vitro and animal studies have suggested that the effects of GLP-1R agonists on vascular endothelium can be categorized into direct and indirect mechanisms. Directly, GLP-1R agonists activate the AMPK-eNOS pathway in ECs, promoting NO production and facilitating endothelial vasodilation (100, 101). Indirectly, these agonists may decelerate atherosclerosis progression by providing endothelial protection through anti-inflammatory actions and enhancement of lipid metabolism (102104). Additionally, GLP-1R agonists have been implicated in the inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombosis, although it remains uncertain whether this mechanism is mediated by ECs (105). Notably, the impact of GLP-1R agonists on FMD appears to be more pronounced in a subgroup of patients with T2DM who do not have CVD (99). Consequently, some studies have hypothesized that individuals without CVD may exhibit heightened sensitivity to the effects of GLP-1R agonists, potentially due to more favorable changes in vascular function than those with CVD, or at least due to less severe impairment of endothelial function in this population.

Sulfonylureas function as insulin secretagogues; however, some studies indicate that the association between sulfonylureas and vascular endothelial function is not particularly strong (89). As a conventional antidiabetic medication, the cardiovascular implications of sulfonylureas in individuals with T2DM remain debatable (106). A meta-analysis encompassing a network of 18 studies involving sulfonylureas revealed that neither gliclazide nor glibenclamide was associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular mortality, although glibenclamide was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (107). This phenomenon may be attributed to their inhibitory effects on ATP-sensitive potassium channels in the cardiovascular smooth muscle cells. Such an effect can hinder myocardial ischemic preconditioning, leading to reduced coronary blood flow and increased peripheral vascular resistance (108).

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors represent two emerging classes of antidiabetic medications. The Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (SAVOR-TIMI) trial (99) was among the first completed studies evaluating DPP-4 inhibitors. This trial indicated that saxagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, was associated with an increased hospitalization rate in patients with heart failure, thereby raising concerns regarding the cardiovascular safety of this pharmacological class (99). Subsequent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on MACE as the primary endpoint, such as the Sitagliptin Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment Trial (TECOS), demonstrated no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between DPP-4 inhibitor treatment and placebo (109). Reaven et al. (110) noted that both SAVOR-TIMI and TECOS were primarily designed as non-inferiority trials, suggesting that their methodological frameworks lack sufficient power to adequately evaluate the cardiovascular benefits of DPP-4 inhibitors. Furthermore, two studies (104, 111) examining FMD from baseline to medium- and long-term follow-ups revealed that sitagliptin, a member of the DPP-4 inhibitor class, did not exhibit a discernible impact on endothelial function during the final observation period. The findings from the TECOS trial also indicated that DPP-4 inhibitors did not significantly decrease the incidence of MACE (109), implying that the protective effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on endothelial function remain limited.

SGLT2 inhibitors are pharmacological agents that lower blood glucose levels by obstructing renal reabsorption of glucose, thereby promoting its excretion in urine (112). The hypoglycemic action of these inhibitors is independent of the insulin levels. Studies have demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors effectively diminish postprandial blood glucose levels and overall glycemic fluctuations in individuals with DM (113, 114). Furthermore, these agents reduce insulin resistance and enhance peripheral insulin sensitivity (115117). In addition to their glycemic effects, SGLT2 inhibitors also exert additional metabolic benefits, including reduction in plasma lipid concentrations, blood pressure, and body weight. Consequently, SGLT2 inhibitors may improve endothelial function by mitigating oxidative stress by reducing blood glucose levels in an insulin-independent manner, minimizing acute glycemic variations, enhancing insulin sensitivity, and improving various metabolic parameters. Several meta-analyses derived from small RCTs have indicated that SGLT2 inhibitors positively influence endothelial function, as assessed by FMD (89). However, it is important to note that SGLT2 inhibitors may elevate the risk of amputation in patients with T2DM and are significantly linked to peripheral vascular hypoperfusion (118). Additionally, clinical investigations have confirmed that SGLT2 inhibitors enhance endothelial function in individuals with DM (119122).

A meta-analysis encompassing five RCTs investigating α-glucosidase inhibitor therapy indicated that these inhibitors effectively delayed the progression of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in individuals diagnosed with T2DM (123). This finding implies that α-glucosidase inhibitors may exert beneficial effects on the vascular endothelial function. Postprandial elevation in glycemic levels is known to induce oxidative stress, which adversely affects endothelial cell functionality (124). Consequently, α-glucosidase inhibitors significantly mitigate postprandial hyperglycemia and reduce oxidative stress-related damage, thereby safeguarding the vascular endothelium. The Cardiovascular Evaluation Trial (ACE) involving acarbose, a member of the α-glucosidase inhibitor class, represents a completed RCT (125) that focused on this therapeutic category. However, the trial did not demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of heart failure or cardiovascular mortality in patients with T2DM or impaired glucose tolerance. It is important to note that this study had certain limitations, as it was conducted exclusively in China and the participant cohort consisted of individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and pre-existing coronary heart disease.

The impact of thiazolidinediones (TZDs), traditional insulinotropic agents, on cardiovascular events remains a subject of considerable debate, with previous RCTs yielding inconsistent findings. In a study utilizing a hypertensive rat model (126), pioglitazone (noting that rosiglitazone and troglitazone were withdrawn from first-line treatment and are therefore not addressed) was demonstrated to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) through the modulation of ET-1 expression, which subsequently mitigated the effects of oxidative stress on vascular structures. Furthermore, pioglitazone has been shown to enhance vascular relaxation (126) by increasing the expression of ET-1 receptor B (ETB), facilitating the release of factors that promote endothelial cell relaxation. The PROspective pioglitazone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROactive trial) represents the first large-scale RCT evaluating the effects of pioglitazone monotherapy on cardiovascular outcomes. Findings from this trial indicated that pioglitazone significantly reduced all-cause mortality as well as the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with T2DM and macrovascular disease (127). Additionally, a meta-analysis suggested that pioglitazone may have a beneficial effect on the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in individuals with established CVDs (128). Nonetheless, it remains uncertain whether improvements in endothelial function attributed to pioglitazone translate into favorable outcomes regarding future cardiovascular events.

Metformin, recognized as an insulin sensitizer, has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing endothelial function, with a notable correlation between endothelial function and insulin resistance following treatment in individuals diagnosed with T2DM (129). Furthermore, metformin has been shown to enhances endothelial function in patients who do not have diabetes but exhibit insulin resistance (130). In a long-term RCT, the incorporation of metformin into treatment regimens significantly decreased the levels of various biomarkers indicative of endothelial function, which are associated with the morbidity risk of CVDs in T2DM patients, in comparison to a placebo group (131). In vitro studies also indicated that the beneficial effects of metformin may arise from multiple mechanisms, including the activation of adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK), endothelium-dependent vascular responses, and protection of ECs against oxidative stress (132). Preclinical investigations have revealed that metformin enhances endothelial function through phosphorylation of eNOS via AMPK activation (133, 134), activation of sirtuin-1 (135, 136), and promotion of antioxidant activity (132). Collectively, these findings suggest that metformin may improve endothelial function through a range of mechanisms, some of which may not be directly related to insulin resistance (133, 137).

Effect of traditional Chinese medicine on diabetic endothelial dysfunction

As a significant component of complementary and alternative medicine, Chinese medicine plays a crucial role in addressing endothelial dysfunction associated with DM. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is primarily employed for the management of endothelial dysfunction in DM, and various research findings have emerged in this area. Recent years have witnessed substantial advancements in the investigation of the individual components of TCM in the treatment of endothelial dysfunction related to DM (See Table 3).

Table 3.

Effect of TCM on endothelial dysfunction in DM.

TCM name Active component Mechanism of action Main findings References
Tanshinone IIA Lipophilic diterpenoids Inhibits NADPH oxidase, reduces oxidative stress, enhances eNOS expression, and promotes NO production Improves endothelial-dependent relaxation and endothelial function (144, 145)
Berberine Isoquinoline alkaloid Inhibits NF-κB activity, reduces inflammatory responses Protects against vascular damage and anti-atherosclerosis (150156)
Resveratrol Polyphenol compound Activates SIRT1, upregulates Nrf2, and reduces ROS production Prevents endothelial cell aging, reduces oxidative stress (139, 141, 142)
Puerarin Isoflavone glycoside Regulates NF-κB, inhibits NOX2 and NOX4-mediated oxidative stress Protects the aorta of diabetic rats by reducing cell adhesion molecule expression (146)
Curcumin Polyphenolic compound Blocks AMPL/p38 MAPK pathway Protects endothelial cells from oxidative stress in diabetic rats (138140)
Matrine alkaloids Sophora alkaloids Activates MKK3/p38 MAPK/Nrf2 signaling pathway, reduces AGEs-induced apoptosis Prevents apoptosis of diabetic endothelial cells (143)
Astragaloside IV Triterpene saponin Modulates glucose/lipid metabolism, inhibits TGF-β1/Smad signaling, reduces oxidative stress Protects aortic endothelial cells and inhibits NF-κB activation (148, 149)
Danshensu + Paeonol Phenolic acids Inhibits p38 MAPK signaling, enhances BKCa protein expression in vascular smooth muscle cells Reduces vascular endothelial cell apoptosis in diabetic conditions (144, 145)
Quercetin Flavonoids compounds Increases the expression of ABCA1, ABCG1 and CYP7A1, promoted cholesterol efflux from macrophages, down-regulated the expression of p53, p21, p16 and ERK, enhanced autophagy to anti-apoptosis, and inhibited MCP-1 and inflammatory cytokines Reduces ROS and releases NOS to protect endothelial cells (157162)

Research has demonstrated that turmeric extract can modulate plasma levels of endothelin, thromboxane, and prostaglandins, while mitigating vasospasm and enhancing both vasodilation and contraction in rats with T2DM over a treatment period of 16 weeks. The extract exerts its effects by inhibiting the activities of COX-2, NF-κB, and PKC as well as by altering the ratio of PGI2 to TXA2 in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats, thereby alleviating diabetes-induced vascular dysfunction. Additionally, turmeric extract inhibits the formation of glycated human serum albumin (CSA) through promoter activation. This treatment also leads to the induction and upregulation of IL-8 in VSMCs, which may obstruct the AMPL/p38MAPK signaling pathway and thereby protect endothelial cell function in T2DM rats (138140).

Resveratrol inhibits the expression and upregulation of IL-8 in VSMCs induced by CSA (139). Furthermore, it activated nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent sirtuin 1 in rats with T2DM exhibiting macroangiopathy over a 24-week period. This activation leads to deacetylation of sirtuin 1 target molecules, including NF-κB. Additionally, resveratrol enhances the expression of antioxidant enzymes through the activation of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and reduces the activity of NADPH oxidase via established mechanisms, thereby inhibiting ROS production (141, 142).

Matrine alkaloids, which are bioactive compounds derived from Sophora flavescens, have been used to treat DM. Research indicates that these alkaloids can promote the phosphorylation of MAPK kinases, specifically MKK3 and MKK6, facilitating the nuclear translocation of Nrf2, enhancing the binding activity of antioxidant response elements, and increasing the expression of heme oxygenase and NADPH quinone oxidoreductase. Furthermore, matrine alkaloids have been shown to inhibit ROS production in aortic ECs and reduce endothelial cell apoptosis, both in vivo and in vitro (143). Consequently, it can be hypothesized that the MKKs/p38 MAPK/Nrf2 signaling pathway plays a significant role in the mechanism by which matrine alkaloids mitigate AGE-induced oxidative stress and subsequent apoptosis in diabetic ECs.

Tanshinone IIA reverses the uncoupling of eNOS induced by high glucose levels. This restoration occurs through the inhibition of several factors including NADPH oxidase, heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), GTP cyclin-1 (GTPCH1), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and PI3K. Additionally, Tanshinone IIA ameliorated abnormal oxidative stress and enhanced endothelium-dependent relaxation in ECs of diabetic rats. The expression of eNOS is initiated at the transcriptional level, leading to increased production of NO, which serves a protective function against endothelial health (144, 145).

Puerarin was administered via intraperitoneal injection to rats with T2DM over a three-week period. These findings indicate that puerarin can modulate the NF-κB pathway and mitigate oxidative stress associated with NADPH oxidase isoforms NOX2 and NOX4. Consequently, this intervention resulted in the downregulation of cell adhesion molecule expression (146), thereby providing protective effects in the aorta of T2DM rats.

Hu Jing’s research revealed for the first time that the combination of danshensu and paeonol can markedly reduce the apoptosis of vascular ECs triggered by elevated glucose levels. This effect is mediated through inhibition of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Additionally, preliminary findings suggest that this combination may safeguard vascular smooth muscle function in diabetic arteries by upregulating BKCa protein expression (147).

These findings indicate that the protective effects of astragaloside on aortic ECs in rats with T2DM may be associated with the modulation of glucose and lipid metabolism abnormalities, alleviation of oxidative stress damage, and suppression of TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathways. Additionally, astragaloside appears to influence the expression of apoptosis-related genes, specifically Bcl-2, Bax, and Caspase-3 (148). Furthermore, it has been documented that both astragaloside IV and ferulic acid, administered at a dose of 50 mg/kg over a period of 10 weeks in diabetic rats, can inhibit the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway by lowering blood glucose levels and decreasing oxLDL and TNF-α concentrations, demonstrating a synergistic effect (149).

Berberine is an isoquinoline alkaloid. Both traditional and contemporary medical research indicates that berberine exhibits a range of pharmacological properties, including hypolipidemic, antidiabetic, antitumor, anti-inflammatory, antidiarrheal, and antibacterial effects (150). Fatahian et al. (151) demonstrated that berberine may possess atheroprotective properties by lowering elevated plasma cholesterol levels, particularly low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), through mechanisms that are both dependent and independent of LDL receptors (LDLR). Additionally, berberine has been shown to inhibit macrophage migration and inflammatory responses, enhance endothelial cell function via its antioxidant properties (152154), and suppress VSMC proliferation (155, 156).

Quercetin is an important flavonoid compound recognized for its pronounced anti-atherosclerotic properties. Contemporary research has demonstrated that quercetin exhibits potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial activities (157). Qian et al. (158) demonstrated that quercetin can diminish the release of ROS and nitric oxide synthase (NOS), thereby safeguarding ECs. Additionally, it enhances the expression of ATP-binding cassette transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1 as well as cytochrome P450 7A1 (CYP7A1), facilitating cholesterol efflux from macrophages. Quercetin also downregulates the expression of p53, p21, p16, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) while promoting autophagy to counteract apoptosis. Furthermore, it inhibits monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and various inflammatory cytokines including interleukins IL-1, IL-2, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α (159162).

Shortcomings and prospects

This study conducted a comprehensive evaluation of representative anti-diabetic medications and TCM for DM, revealing significant disparities in their effects on vascular function. Notably, GLP-1 receptor agonists, a class of novel anti-diabetic agents, appear to possess distinct advantages in enhancing vascular function in patients with DM. However, these studies have several limitations must be acknowledged in these investigations. For instance, the data extraction and transformation processes utilized in two of the included studies (101, 104) may introduce follow-up bias. Furthermore, while our analysis encompassed eight anti-diabetic drugs, variations may exist even among products within the same category. Additional factors contributing to the inconsistencies observed in this study include the duration of DM, which ranged from newly diagnosed cases to those exceeding three years, as well as racial and regional differences among the participants involved in the analysis. Moreover, although all included studies reported that the assessment of FMD was conducted by a professional sonographer in a blinded manner, the potential for measurement errors remains a concern.

TCM has been shown to have beneficial effects on blood glucose levels, insulin resistance, lipid metabolism, and oxidative stress through pathways involving AGE, PI3K/Akt, NF-κB, and AMP-AMPK, thereby ameliorating the endothelial dysfunction associated with DM. However, the existing body of research consists primarily of in vitro and animal model studies focusing on TCM extracts and their individual components, with a notable scarcity of human clinical trials. In comparison with contemporary antidiabetic pharmacotherapies, there is a limited amount of clinical trial data (163) evaluating the efficacy of TCM in addressing biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in DM. Furthermore, TCM’s approach of TCM to disease treatment is predicated on syndrome differentiation, which involves tailoring prescriptions and therapies to specific syndromic presentations. Current in vitro and animal studies using TCM monomers and extracts do not adequately capture the principles of syndrome differentiation inherent in TCM practice, highlighting a significant gap in clinical research. Additionally, it is important to acknowledge that the indirect agonistic effects of certain TCM extracts, such as resveratrol and quercetin, are relatively weak, their bioavailability is insufficient, and there is a paucity of in vivo pharmacokinetic studies, which represents a limitation in the current research landscape.

Currently, our research group is engaged in investigating the treatment of endothelial dysfunction associated with DM using TCM. For instance, the study conducted by Dr. Xu et al. (164) utilized network pharmacology, molecular docking, and in vitro experimental validation to demonstrate that Danggui Liuhuang Decoction (DGLHD), a traditional Chinese medicinal formulation, effectively mitigates the release of pro-inflammatory factors and vascular endothelial growth factor by inhibiting the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, thereby alleviating endothelial dysfunction in DM. Additionally, Dr. Sha et al. (who is also a co-author of this work) (165) discovered both in vivo and in vitro that Astragalus polysaccharide (APS) enhances vascular endothelial function in DM by activating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway, which promotes macrophage polarization towards the M2 phenotype. Another investigation led by Dr. Sha (166) revealed that miR-142-3p contributes to the progression of diabetes by suppressing SPRED2-mediated autophagy, resulting in increased apoptosis, oxidative stress, and inflammatory cytokine secretion, which were ameliorated by resveratrol. Furthermore, Zhang et al. (167) identified a significant association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) and endothelial dysfunction in T2DM in a cross-sectional study involving 243 patients, suggesting that MHR may serve as a novel biomarker for assessing vascular endothelial function. Wei et al. (168) reported that puerarin (Pue) mitigates endothelial cell injury and cardiovascular complications related to DM induced by LPS-ATP or high glucose through the ROS-NLRP3 signaling pathway. Along with my colleagues, Dr. Jin and Dr. Yu, I am also actively contributing to this field of research, and we are optimistic about achieving further advancements in the near future.

Conclusion

Endothelial dysfunction is a significant therapeutic target in individuals diagnosed with DM. The pathophysiology underlying this dysfunction may be attributed to oxidative stress induced by acute glucose fluctuations, chronic hyperglycemia, and diminished NO production, resulting from selective insulin resistance in ECs. A multifaceted approach is recommended to address this issue, encompassing lifestyle modifications, such as weight reduction, engagement in aerobic exercise, and cessation of smoking. Furthermore, the use of antidiabetic medications that mitigate acute glucose variations, such as glinides, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and DPP-4 inhibitors, as well as those that enhance insulin sensitivity, including thiazolidinediones and metformin, are anticipated to positively influence endothelial function in patients with DM. Preclinical investigations have demonstrated that GLP1-R agonists, metformin, and SGLT2 inhibitors can enhance endothelial function through various mechanisms, some of which are independent of glycemic control or insulin signaling pathways, such as the activation of eNOS phosphorylation via AMP-AMPK and sirtuin-1. Careful selection of appropriate antidiabetic pharmacotherapy aimed at improving endothelial function is clinically important for the prevention of vascular complications associated with DM, thereby enhancing the overall prognosis for patients with this condition.

The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying morbidity associated with DM are intricate, and vascular endothelial dysfunction has received considerable attention in recent years. ECs are crucial components of the endocrine system and are particularly susceptible to environmental influences. Factors such as hyperglycemia, AGEs, oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL), and abnormal insulin expression can directly or indirectly induce endothelial dysfunction. TCM holds significant potential in the clinical management of diabetic endothelial dysfunction owing to its multi-component and multi-target nature. Increasing recognition among pharmacological researchers has emerged regarding the efficacy of TCM monomers, extracts, and compounds for addressing endothelial dysfunction associated with DM. Recent studies have shown that TCM primarily modulates several signaling pathways, including AGEs, PI3K/AKT, NF-κB, Nrf2, LOX-1, and AMPK, to enhance NO bioavailability, inhibit angiotensin II synthesis, mitigate oxidative stress, regulate inflammatory and angiogenic factors, and prevent thrombosis. These actions contribute to the effective restoration of vascular ECs and attenuation of the onset and progression of endothelial dysfunction in DM.

However, the complex composition and numerous targets of TCM pose challenges in elucidating its mechanisms of action and the associated signaling pathways that ameliorate endothelial dysfunction in DM. Future research endeavors may benefit from integrating network pharmacology and proteomics to identify key genetic information and signaling pathways.

While this article aims to underscore a holistic approach to treating endothelial dysfunction in DM, it is noteworthy that the integration of Western medicine with TCM in the management of related diseases is actively practiced in China, yielding positive outcomes. Nonetheless, there remains a paucity of comprehensive clinical studies that are multi-centered, involve large sample sizes, and maintain high quality for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction in DM. This gap represents a focal point for our research group, which aspirates for more extensive, thorough, and in-depth experimental and clinical investigations within the medical community.

Glossary

Glossary

DM

Diabetes mellitus

CVDs

Cardiovascular diseases

T2DM

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

ACH

Acetylcholine

EDRF

Endothelium-derived relaxing factors

NO

Nitric oxide

PGI2

Prostacyclin

EDHFs

Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors

ET-1

Endothelin 1

PGF2α

Prostaglandin F2α

TXA2

Thromboxane A2

RAS

Renin-angiotensin system

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

O2• − 

Superoxide anion radical

BH4

Tetrahydrobiopterin

eNOS

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase

XO

Xanthine oxidase

COX

Cyclooxygenase

MAPK

Mitogen activated protein kinase

PI3K

Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase

VSMCs

Vascular smooth muscle cells

ECM

Extracellular matrix

ECs

Endothelial cells

TNF

Tumor necrosis factor

IL-1β

Interleukin-1β

IFN-γ

Interferon-γ

VCAM-1

Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

ICAM-1

Intercellular adhesion molecule-1

AGEs

Advanced Glycation End Products

NF-κB

Nuclear factor-κB

RAGE

Receptor for advanced glycation end products

ATP

Adenosine triphosphate

H2O

Hydroxylic acid

CO2

Carbon dioxide

NADH

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

FADH2

Flavine adenine dinucleotide-reduced

TCA

Tricarboxylic acid

GAPDH

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

PKC

Protein kinase C

HbA1c

Glycated hemoglobin

RCTs

Randomized controlled trials

DCCT

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

UKPDS

United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study

miRs

MicroRNAs

FMD

Flow-mediated dilation

T1DM

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

LEADER

The Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results

SUSTAIN-6

Semaglutide in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes

GLP-1R

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor

DPP-4

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4

SGLT2

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2

SAVOR-TIMI

The Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction

MACE

Major adverse cardiovascular events

TECOS

Sitagliptin Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment Trial

CIMT

Carotid intima-media thickness

ACE

Acarbose Cardiovascular Evaluation

TZDs

Thiazolidinediones

PPARs

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

ETB

ET-1 receptor B

PROactive trial

The prospective pioglitazone clinical trial in macrovascular events

AMP

Adenosine 5′-monophosphate

AMPK

Activated protein kinase

TCM

Traditional Chinese medicine

STZ

Streptozotocin

GSA

Glycated serum albumin

NAD

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

Nrf2

Nuclear factor E2-related factor 2

HSP90

Heat shock protein 90

GTPCH1

GTP cyclin-1

DHFR

Dihydrofolate reductase

oxLDL

Oxidized low-density lipoprotein

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Clinical Specialty of Putuo District, Shanghai (2020tszk01), Medical Key Specialty of Shanghai (ZK2019B16), Putuo District Health System Science and Technology Innovation Project (ptkwws202003), Scientific Research Project of Shanghai Health Commission (20204Y0154), Scientific Research project of Shanghai Health Commission (202240309).

Author contributions

ZL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JL: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. WS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. TL: Data curation, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.American Diabetes Association . Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. (2014) 37:S81–90. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mekala KC, Bertoni AG. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus [M]. Transplantation, bioengineering, and regeneration of the endocrine pancreas. Elsevier. (2020) 107:49–58. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814833-4.00004-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, Grobbee R, Maniadakis N, Flather M, et al. European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2017. Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:508–79. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Einarson TR, Acs A, Ludwig C, Panton UH. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2018) 17:1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0728-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feener EP, King GL. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: role in cardiovascular disease. Heart Fail Monit. (2003) 1:74–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature. (1980) 288:373–6. doi: 10.1038/288373a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Palmer RM, Ferrige A, Moncada S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature. (1987) 327:524–6. doi: 10.1038/327524a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moncada S, Higgs E. The discovery of nitric oxide and its role in vascular biology. Br J Pharmacol. (2006) 147:S193–201. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vanhoutte P, Shimokawa H, Feletou M, Tang E. H. C. Endothelial dysfunction and vascular disease–a 30th anniversary update. Acta Physiol. (2017) 219:22–96. doi: 10.1111/apha.12646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wong WT, Tian XY, Huang Y. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes and hypertension: cross talk in Ras, bmp 4, and Ros-dependent cox-2–derived prostanoids. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. (2013) 61:204–14. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31827fe46e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yuan T, Yang T, Chen H, Fu D, Hu Y, Wang J, et al. New insights into oxidative stress and inflammation during diabetes mellitus-accelerated atherosclerosis. Redox Biol. (2019) 20:247–60. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.09.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Iacobini C, Vitale M, Pesce C, Pugliese G, Menini S. Diabetic complications and oxidative stress: a 20-year voyage Back in time and Back to the future. A 20-Year Voyage Back Time Back Future. (2021) 10:727. doi: 10.3390/antiox10050727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shah MS, Brownlee M. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of cardiovascular disorders in diabetes. Circ Res. (2016) 118:1808–29. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.306923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mcveigh G, Brennan G, Johnston G, McDermott b, McGrath L, Henry W, et al. Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. (1992) 35:771–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00429099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Johnstone MT, Creager SJ, Scales KM, Cusco JA, Lee BK, Creager MA. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Circulation. (1993) 88:2510–6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.88.6.2510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Torimoto K, Okada Y, Tanaka Y. Type 2 diabetes and vascular endothelial dysfunction. J Uoeh. (2018) 40:65–75. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.40.65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaiser N, Sasson S, Feener EP, Boukobza-Vardi N, Higashi S, Moller DE, et al. Differential regulation of glucose transport and transporters by glucose in vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Diabetes. (1993) 42:80–9. doi: 10.2337/diab.42.1.80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sies H, Jones DP. Reactive oxygen species (Ros) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2020) 21:363–83. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Higashi Y, Noma K, Yoshizumi M, Kihara Y. Endothelial function and oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases. Circ J. (2009) 73:411–8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-08-1102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Förstermann U, Xia N, Li H. Roles of vascular oxidative stress and nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. (2017) 120:713–35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bartesaghi S, Radi R. Fundamentals on the biochemistry of peroxynitrite and protein tyrosine nitration. Redox Biol. (2018) 14:618–25. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Förstermann U, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. Eur Heart J. (2012) 33:829–37. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang H, Dellsperger KC, Zhang C. The link between metabolic abnormalities and endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: an update. Basic Res Cardiol. (2012) 107:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00395-011-0237-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sies H. Oxidative stress: a concept in redox biology and medicine. Redox Biol. (2015) 4:180–3. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hamilton SJ, Watts GF. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes: pathogenesis, significance, and treatment. Review Diabetic Studies. (2013) 10:133–56. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2013.10.133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kuboki K, Jiang ZY, Takahara N, Ha SW, Igarashi M, Yamauchi T, et al. Regulation of endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene expression in endothelial cells and in vivo: a specific vascular action of insulin. Circulation. (2000) 101:676–81. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.6.676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Montagnani M, Chen H, Barr VA, Quon MJ. Insulin-stimulated activation of enos is independent of Ca2+ but requires phosphorylation by Akt at Ser1179. J Biol Chem. (2001) 276:30392–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103702200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ferri C, Pittoni V, Piccoli A, Laurenti O, Cassone MR, Bellini C, et al. Insulin stimulates endothelin-1 secretion from human endothelial cells and modulates its circulating levels in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. (1995) 80:829–35. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Taniguchi CM, Emanuelli B, Kahn CR. Critical nodes in signalling pathways: insights into insulin action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2006) 7:85–96. doi: 10.1038/nrm1837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jiang ZY, Lin Y-W, Clemont A, Feener EP, Hein KD, Igarashi M, et al. Characterization of selective resistance to insulin signaling in the vasculature of obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats. J Clin Invest. (1999) 104:447–57. doi: 10.1172/JCI5971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cusi K, Maezono K, Osman A, Pendergrass M, Patti ME, Pratipanawatr T, et al. Insulin resistance differentially affects the pi 3-kinase–and map kinase–mediated signaling in human muscle. J Clin Invest. (2000) 105:311–20. doi: 10.1172/JCI7535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wheatcroft S, Williams I, Shah A, Kearney MT. Pathophysiological implications of insulin resistance on vascular endothelial function. Diabet Med. (2003) 20:255–68. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00869.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vozarova B, Weyer C, Hanson K, Tataranni PA, Bogardus C, Pratley RE. Circulating interleukin-6 in relation to adiposity, insulin action, and insulin secretion. Obes Res. (2001) 9:414–7. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Festa A, D’Agostino R, Jr, Howard G, Mykkänen L, Tracy R, Haffner S. Chronic subclinical inflammation as part of the insulin resistance syndrome: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study (Iras). Circulation. (2000) 102:42–7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.1.42, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sprague AH, Khalil RA. Inflammatory cytokines in vascular dysfunction and vascular disease. Biochem Pharmacol. (2009) 78:539–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.04.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Brown DI, Griendling KK. Regulation of signal transduction by reactive oxygen species in the cardiovascular system. Circ Res. (2015) 116:531–49. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Walker AE, Kaplon RE, Pierce GL, Nowlan MJ, Seals DR. Prevention of age-related endothelial dysfunction by habitual aerobic exercise in healthy humans: possible role of nuclear factor κB. Clin Sci. (2014) 127:645–54. doi: 10.1042/CS20140030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hotamisgill G. Adipose expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha: direct role in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Science. (1996) 359:625–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sethi JK, Hotamisligil G. The role of TNFα in adipocyte metabolism. In Seminars in cell & developmental biology. (1999) 10:19–29. Academic Press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rask-Madsen C, King GL. Mechanisms of disease: endothelial dysfunction in insulin resistance and diabetes. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. (2007) 3:46–56. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Uysal KT, Wiesbrock SM, Marino MW, Hotamisligil GS. Protection from obesity-induced insulin resistance in mice lacking Tnf-α function. Nature. (1997) 389:610–4. doi: 10.1038/39335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Goldfine AB, Fonseca V, Jablonski KA, Chen YDI, Tipton L, Staten MA, et al. Salicylate (salsalate) in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. (2013) 159:1–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-1-201307020-00003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang J, Patel JM, Li YD, Block ER. Proinflammatory cytokines downregulate gene expression and activity of constitutive nitric oxide synthase in porcine pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol. (1997) 96:71–87. PMID: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brownlee M. Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature. (2001) 414:813–20. doi: 10.1038/414813a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nishikawa T, Edelstein D, du X, Yamagishi SI, Matsumura T, Kaneda Y, et al. Normalizing mitochondrial superoxide production blocks three pathways of hyperglycaemic damage. Nature. (2000) 404:787–90. doi: 10.1038/35008121, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Murphy MP. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J. (2009) 417:1–13. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.du X, Edelstein D, Dimmeler S, Ju Q, Sui C, Brownlee M. Hyperglycemia inhibits endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity by posttranslational modification at the Akt site. J Clin Invest. (2001) 108:1341–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI11235, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ceriello A. The emerging role of post-prandial hyperglycaemic spikes in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. Diabet Med. (1998) 15:188–93. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Risso A, Mercuri F, Quagliaro L, Damante G, Ceriello A. Intermittent high glucose enhances apoptosis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells in culture. Amer J Physiol Endocrinol Metabolism. (2001) 281:E924–30. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.5.E924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Quagliaro L, Piconi L, Assaloni R, Martinelli L, Motz E, Ceriello A. Intermittent high glucose enhances apoptosis related to oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: the role of protein kinase C and Nad (P) H-oxidase activation. Diabetes. (2003) 52:2795–804. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.11.2795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, et al. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. (2006) 295:1681–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Torimoto K, Okada Y, Mori H, Tanaka Y. Relationship between fluctuations in glucose levels measured by continuous glucose monitoring and vascular endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2013) 12:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Advance Collaborative Group . Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2008) 358:2560–72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Accord Study Group . Long-term effects of intensive glucose lowering on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364:818–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, Reda D, Emanuele N, Reaven PD, et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2009) 360:129–39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Roy S, Sala R, Cagliero E, Lorenzi M. Overexpression of fibronectin induced by diabetes or high glucose: phenomenon with a memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1990) 87:404–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Engerman RL, Kern TS. Progression of incipient diabetic retinopathy during good glycemic control. Diabetes. (1987) 36:808–12. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.36.7.808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pooi-See C, Mamta K, Renu AK. Resistance of retinal inflammatory mediators to suppress after reinstitution of good glycemic control: novel mechanism for metabolic memory. J Diabetes Complicat. (2008) 24:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rama N. Epigenetic mechanisms in diabetic vascular complications and metabolic memory: the 2020 Edwin Bierman award lecture. Diabetes. (2021) 70:328–37. doi: 10.2337/dbi20-0030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.El-Osta A, Brasacchio D, Yao D, Pocai A, Jones PL, Roeder RG, et al. Transient high glucose causes persistent epigenetic changes and altered gene expression during subsequent normoglycemia. J Exp Med. (2008) 205:2409–17. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hiltunen MO, Turunen MP, Häkkinen TP, Rutanen J, Hedman M, Mäkinen K, et al. Dna hypomethylation and methyltransferase expression in atherosclerotic lesions. Vasc Med. (2002) 7:5–11. doi: 10.1191/1358863x02vm418oa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chan Y, Fish JE, D’Abreo C, Lin S, Robb G, Teichert AM, et al. The cell-specific expression of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. (2004) 279:35087–100. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405063200, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fradin D, Bougneres P. T2dm: why epigenetics? J Nutr Metabol. (2011) 2011:647514: 1–17. doi: 10.1155/2011/647514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jiang M, Zhang Y, Liu M, Lan MS, Fei J, Fan W, et al. Hypermethylation of hepatic glucokinase and L-type pyruvate kinase promoters in high-fat diet–induced obese rats. Endocrinology. (2011) 152:1284–9. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wang X, Qian R, Zhang W, Chen SF, Jin HM, Hu RM. Microrna-320 expression in myocardial microvascular endothelial cells and its relationship with insulin-like growth factor-1 in type 2 diabetic rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. (2009) 36:181–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.05057.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Caporali A, Meloni M, Völlenkle C, Bonci D, Sala-Newby GB, Addis R, et al. Deregulation of microrna-503 contributes to diabetes mellitus–induced impairment of endothelial function and reparative angiogenesis after limb ischemia. Circulation. (2011) 123:282–91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.952325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Liu X, Cheng Y, Yang J, Xu L, Zhang C. Cell-specific effects of mi R-221/222 in vessels: molecular mechanism and therapeutic application. J Mol Cell Cardiol. (2012) 52:245–55. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Li Y, Song Y-H, Li F, Yang T, Lu YW, Geng YJ. Microrna-221 regulates high glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2009) 381:81–3. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.02.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dentelli P, Rosso A, Orso F, Olgasi C, Taverna D, Brizzi MF. Microrna-222 controls neovascularization by regulating signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A expression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2010) 30:1562–8. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.206201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wang S, Aurora AB, Johnson BA, Qi X, McAnally J, Hill JA, et al. The endothelial-specific microrna miR-126 governs vascular integrity and angiogenesis. Dev Cell. (2008) 15:261–71. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Fasanaro P, D’Alessandra Y, di V, Melchionna R, Romani S, Pompilio G, et al. Microrna-210 modulates endothelial cell response to hypoxia and inhibits the receptor tyrosine kinase ligand Ephrin-A3. J Biol Chem. (2008) 283:15878–83. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800731200, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sabatel C, Malvaux L, Bovy N, Deroanne C, Lambert V, Gonzalez MLA, et al. Microrna-21 exhibits antiangiogenic function by targeting RhoB expression in endothelial cells. PLoS One. (2011) 6:e16979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Alessandra M, Simona G, Carlo G, et al. Oxidative stress and micrornas in vascular diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2013) 14:17319–46. doi: 10.3390/ijms140917319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Magenta A, D’agostino M, Sileno S, Di Vito L, Uras C, Abeni D, et al. The oxidative stress-induced miR-200c is upregulated in psoriasis and correlates with disease severity and determinants of cardiovascular risk. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. (2020) 2019:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2019/8061901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.D’Agostino M, Martino F, Sileno S, Barillà F, Beji S, Marchetti L, et al. Circulating miR-200c is up-regulated in paediatric patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia and correlates with miR-33a/b levels: implication of a Zeb1-dependent mechanism. Clin Sci (Lond). (2017) 131:2397–408. doi: 10.1042/CS20171121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cavallari I, Ciccarese F, Sharova E, Urso L, Raimondi V, Silic-Benussi M, et al. The miR-200 family of micrornas: fine tuners of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and circulating Cancer biomarkers. Cancers (Basel). (2021) 13. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sundararajan V, Burk UC, Bajdak-Rusinek K. Revisiting the miR-200 family: a clan of five siblings with essential roles in development and disease. Biomol Ther. (2022) 12. doi: 10.3390/biom12060781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kozak J, Jonak K, Maciejewski R. The function of miR-200 family in oxidative stress response evoked in cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Biomed Pharmacother. (2020) 125:110037. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Babaei G, Raei N, Milani AT, Aziz AG-G, Pourjabbar N, Geravand F. The emerging role of miR-200 family in metastasis: focus on Emt, Cscs, angiogenesis, and anoikis. Mol Biol Rep. (2021) 48:6935–47. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06666-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Carlomosti F, D’Agostino M, Beji S, Torcinaro A, Rizzi R, Zaccagnini G, et al. Oxidative stress-induced miR-200c disrupts the regulatory loop among Sirt1, Foxo1, and enos. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2016) 27:328–44. doi: 10.1089/ars.2016.6643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lin X, Zhu K, Qiu Z, Li R, Li L, Lu L, et al. Associations between beverage consumption and risk of microvascular complications among individuals with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2024) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shantikumar S, Caporali A, Emanueli C. Role of micrornas in diabetes and its cardiovascular complications. Cardiovasc Res. (2012) 93:583–93. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Du H, Zhao Y, Yin D, Wang D, Chen C. The role of miR-320 in glucose and lipid metabolism disorder-associated diseases. Int J Biol Sci. (2021) 17:402–16. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.53419, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gilad S, Meiri E, Yogev Y, Benjamin S, Lebanony D, Yerushalmi N, et al. Serum micrornas are promising novel biomarkers. PLoS One. (2008) 3:e 3148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zampetaki A, Kiechl S, Drozdov I, Willeit P, Mayr U, Prokopi M, et al. Plasma microrna profiling reveals loss of endothelial miR-126 and other micrornas in type 2 diabetes. Circ Res. (2010) 107:810–7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.226357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Thijssen DH, Black MA, Pyke KE, et al. Assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans: a methodological and physiological guideline. Am J Phys Heart Circ Phys. (2011) 300:H2–H12. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00471.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Thijssen DH, Bruno RM, Van Mil AC, et al. Expert consensus and evidence-based recommendations for the assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans. Eur Heart J. (2019) 40:2534–47. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Stojanović M, Prostran M, Radenković M. Thiazolidinediones improve flow-mediated dilation: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. (2016) 72:385–98. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1999-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Batzias K, Antonopoulos AS, Oikonomou E, Siasos G, Bletsa E, Stampouloglou PK, et al. Effects of newer antidiabetic drugs on endothelial function and arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res. (2018) 2018:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2018/1232583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Fei Y, Tsoi M-F, Cheung BMY. Cardiovascular outcomes in trials of new antidiabetic drug classes: a network meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2019) 18:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0916-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Control D, Trial C. Epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications (Dcct/Edic) study research group intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2005) 353:2643–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Nolan CJ, Ruderman NB, Kahn SE, Pedersen O, Prentki M. Insulin resistance as a physiological defense against metabolic stress: implications for the management of subsets of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. (2015) 64:673–86. doi: 10.2337/db14-0694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JFE, Nauck MA, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375:311–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375:1834–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Frías JP, Davies MJ, Rosenstock J, Pérez Manghi FC, Fernández Landó L, Bergman BK, et al. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2021) 385:503–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Cardillo C, Nambi SS, Kilcoyne CM, Choucair WK, Katz A, Quon MJ, et al. Insulin stimulates both endothelin and nitric oxide activity in the human forearm. Circulation. (1999) 100:820–5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.100.8.820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Muniyappa R, Montagnani M, Koh KK, Quon MJ. Cardiovascular actions of insulin. Endocr Rev. (2007) 28:463–91. doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Arcaro G, Cretti A, Balzano S, Lechi A, Muggeo M, Bonora E, et al. Insulin causes endothelial dysfunction in humans: sites and mechanisms. Circulation. (2002) 105:576–82. doi: 10.1161/hc0502.103333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Wang Y, Yao M, Wang J, Liu H, Zhang X, Zhao L, et al. Effects of antidiabetic drugs on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. (2022) 13:818537. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.818537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Han L, Yu Y, Sun X, Wang B. Exendin-4 directly improves endothelial dysfunction in isolated aortas from obese rats through the camp or Ampk–enos pathways. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2012) 97:453–60. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Tamura H, Kondo Y, Ito K, Hasebe M, Satoh S, Terauchi Y. Comparison of the effects of empagliflozin and glimepiride on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled study. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0262831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metab. (2018) 27:740–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sposito AC, Berwanger O, de L, Saraiva J. Glp-1ras in type 2 diabetes: mechanisms that underlie cardiovascular effects and overview of cardiovascular outcome data. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2018) 17:157. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0800-2, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Nomoto H, Miyoshi H, Furumoto T, Oba K, Tsutsui H, Inoue A, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of sitagliptin and glimepiride on endothelial function and metabolic parameters: Sapporo Athero-Incretin study 1 (Sais1). PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0164255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Chien C-T, Fan S-C, Lin S-C, Kuo CC, Yang CH, Yu TY, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist activation ameliorates venous thrombosis-induced arteriovenous fistula failure in chronic kidneyd isease. Thromb Haemost. (2014) 112:1051–64. doi: 10.1160/th14-03-0258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Webb DR, Davies MJ, Jarvis J, Seidu S, Khunti K. The right place for Sulphonylureas today: part of ‘review the series: implications of recent Cvots in type 2 diabetes mellitus’. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2019) 157:107836. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Simpson SH, Lee J, Choi S, Vandermeer B, Abdelmoneim AS, Featherstone TR. Mortality risk among sulfonylureas: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2015) 3:43–51. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70213-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Abdelmoneim A, Eurich D, Light P, et al. Cardiovascular safety of sulphonylureas: over 40 years of continuous controversy without an answer. Diabetes Obes Metab. (2015) 17:523–32. doi: 10.1111/dom.12456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Scheen AJ. Cardiovascular effects of new oral glucose-lowering agents: Dpp-4 and Sglt-2 inhibitors. Circ Res. (2018) 122:1439–59. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Koska J, Sands M, Burciu C, Reaven P. Cardiovascular effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Vascular Disease Research. (2015) 12:154–63. doi: 10.1177/1479164114562411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Maruhashi T, Higashi Y, Kihara Y, et al. Long-term effect of sitagliptin on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis of the prologue study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2016) 15:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0438-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kamel NM, Abd M, el-Abhar H, Abdallah D. Novel repair mechanisms in a renal ischaemia/reperfusion model: subsequent saxagliptin treatment modulates the pro-angiogenic Glp-1/camp/Vegf, Anp/enos/no, Sdf-1α/Cxcr4, and Kim-1/Stat3/Hif-1α/Vegf/enos pathways. Eur J Pharmacol. (2019) 861:172620: 172620. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172620, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Rodbard HW, Peters AL, Slee A, Cao A, Traina SB, Alba M. The effect of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, on glycemic end points assessed by continuous glucose monitoring and patient-reported outcomes among people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2017) 40:171–80. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Henry RR, Strange P, Zhou R, Pettus J, Shi L, Zhuplatov SB, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on 24-hour glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. (2018) 20:715–24. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Merovci A, Solis-Herrera C, Daniele G, Eldor R, Fiorentino TV, Tripathy D, et al. Dapagliflozin improves muscle insulin sensitivity but enhances endogenous glucose production. J Clin Invest. (2014) 124:509–14. doi: 10.1172/JCI70704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ferrannini E, Muscelli E, Frascerra S, Baldi S, Mari A, Heise T, et al. Metabolic response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Invest. (2014) 124:499–508. doi: 10.1172/JCI72227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Obata A, Kubota N, Kubota T, Iwamoto M, Sato H, Sakurai Y, et al. Tofogliflozin improves insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and accelerates lipolysis in adipose tissue in male mice. Endocrinology. (2016) 157:1029–42. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:644–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Sugiyama S, Jinnouchi H, Kurinami N, Hieshima K, Yoshida A, Jinnouchi K, et al. The Sglt2 inhibitor dapagliflozin significantly improves the peripheral microvascular endothelial function in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Intern Med. (2018) 57:2147–56. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0701-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Sakai T, Miura S. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor on vascular endothelial and diastolic function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction—novel Prospective cohort study—. Circulation Reports. (2019) 1:286–95. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Tochiya M, Makino H, Tamanaha T, Matsuo M, Hishida A, Koezuka R, et al. Effect of tofogliflozin on cardiac and vascular endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart diseases: a pilot study. J Diabetes Investig. (2020) 11:400–4. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Sawada T, Uzu K, Hashimoto N, Onishi T, Takaya T, Shimane A, et al. Empagliflozin’s ameliorating effect on plasma triglycerides: association with endothelial function recovery in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. J Atheroscler Thromb. (2020) 27:644–56. doi: 10.5551/jat.50807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Geng D-F, Jin D-M, Wu W, Fang C, Wang JF. Effect of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors on the progression of carotid intima-media thickness: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Atherosclerosis. (2011) 218:214–9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ceriello A, Esposito K, Piconi L, Ihnat MA, Thorpe JE, Testa R, et al. Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. (2008) 57:1349–54. doi: 10.2337/db08-0063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wamil M, Mcmurray JJ, Scott CA, Standl E, Rydén L, Holman RR, et al. Predicting heart failure events in patients with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance: insights from the acarbose cardiovascular evaluation (ace) trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2020) 170:108488. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Palacios-Ramírez R, Hernanz R, Martín A, Pérez-Girón JV, Barrús MT, González-Carnicero Z, et al. Pioglitazone modulates the vascular contractility in hypertension by interference with Et-1 pathway. Sci Rep. (2019) 9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52839-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules IK, et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the Proactive study (Prospective pioglit Azone clinical Trial in macroVascular events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2005) 366:1279–89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67528-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.de Jong M, van der Worp HB, van der Graaf Y, Visseren FL, Westerink J. Pioglitazone and the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2017) 16:134. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0617-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Chan NN. Improved endothelial function with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Improved endothelial function with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. (2001) 38:2131. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01630-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Vitale C, Mercuro G, Cornoldi A, Fini M, Volterrani M, Rosano G. Metformin improves endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome. J Intern Med. (2003) 41:172620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Jager JD, Kooy A, Schalkwijk C, Fini M, Volterrani M, Rosano G. Long-term effects of metformin on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med. (2013) 275:59–70. doi: 10.1111/joim.12128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Salvatore T, Pafundi PC, Galiero R, Rinaldi L, Caturano A, Vetrano E, et al. Can metformin exert as an active drug on endothelial dysfunction in diabetic subjects? Biomedicines. (2020) 9:3. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9010003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Chen Z-P, Mitchelhill KI, Michell BJ, Stapleton D, Rodriguez-Crespo I, Witters LA, et al. Amp-activated protein kinase phosphorylation of endothelial no synthase. FEBS Lett. (1999) 443:285–9. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01705-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Davis BJ, Xie Z, Viollet B, Zou MH. Activation of the amp-activated kinase by antidiabetes drug metformin stimulates nitric oxide synthesis in vivo by promoting the association of heat shock protein 90 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Diabetes. (2006) 55:496–505. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db05-1064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Mattagajasingh I, Kim C-S, Naqvi A, Yamamori T, Hoffman TA, Jung SB, et al. Sirt1 promotes endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation by activating endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2007) 104:14855–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704329104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Arunachalam G, Samuel SM, Marei I, Ding H, Triggle CR. Metformin modulates hyperglycaemia-induced endothelial senescence and apoptosis through Sirt1. Br J Pharmacol. (2014) 171:523–35. doi: 10.1111/bph.12496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Pitocco DF, et al. Metformin improves endothelial function in type 1 diabetic subjects: a pilot, placebo-controlled randomized study. Diabetes. Obesity Metabol. (2012) 15:427–31. doi: 10.1111/dom.12041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Zhang D-W, Fu M, Gao S-H, Liu J-L. Curcumin and diabetes: a systematic review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2013) 2013:636053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Choi K-H, Park J-W, Kim H-Y, Kim YH, Kim SM, Son YH, et al. Cellular factors involved in Cxcl 8 expression induced by glycated serum albumin in vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis. (2010) 209:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.08.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Guo S, Meng X-w, Yang X-s, Liu X-f, Ou-Yang C-h, Liu C. Curcumin administration suppresses collagen synthesis in the hearts of rats with experimental diabetes. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2018) 39:195–204. doi: 10.1038/aps.2017.92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Xia N, Forstermann U, Li H. Resveratrol as a gene regulator in the vasculature[J]. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. (2014) 15:401–8. doi: 10.2174/1389201015666140711114450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Xia N, Förstermann U, Li H. Effects of resveratrol on enos in the endothelium and the perivascular adipose tissue. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2017) 1403:132–41. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Liu Z, Lv Y, Zhang Y, Liu F, Zhu L, Pan S, et al. Matrine-type alkaloids inhibit advanced glycation end products induced reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis of aortic endothelial cells in vivo and in vitro by targeting Mkk3 and p38mapk signaling. J Am Heart Assoc. (2017) 6:e007441. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Li Y-H, Xu Q, Xu W-H, Guo XH, Zhang S, Chen YD. Mechanisms of protection against diabetes-induced impairment of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation by Tanshinone Iia. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (Bba)-General Subjects. (2015) 1850:813–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Zhou Z-W, Xie X-L, Zhou S-F, Li CG. Mechanism of reversal of high glucose-induced endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling by tanshinone Iia in human endothelial cell line Ea. hy926. Eur J Pharmacol. (2012) 697:97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.09.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Li W, Zhao W, Wu Q, Lu Y, Shi J, Chen X. Puerarin improves diabetic aorta injury by inhibiting Nadph oxidase-derived oxidative stress in Stz-induced diabetic rats. J Diabetes Res. (2016) 2016:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2016/8541520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Hu J, Li Y-L, Li Z-L, Li H, Zhou XX, Qiu PC, et al. Chronic supplementation of paeonol combined with danshensu for the improvement of vascular reactivity in the cerebral basilar artery of diabetic rats. Int J Mol Sci. (2012) 13:14565–78. doi: 10.3390/ijms131114565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Yin Y, Qi F, Song Z, Zhang B, Teng J. Ferulic acid combined with astragaloside iv protects against vascular endothelial dysfunction in diabetic rats. Biosci Trends. (2014) 8:217–26. doi: 10.5582/bst.2014.01081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.You L-Z, Lin Y-X, Fang Z-H, Shen Z-M, Zhao J-D, Wang T-T. Research advances on astragaloside-iv in treatment of diabetes mellitus and its complications pharmacological effects. Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi= Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi= China journal of Chinese Materia. Medica. (2017) 42:4700–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Zhang L-S, Zhang J-H, Feng R, Jin XY, Yang FW, Ji ZC, et al. Efficacy and safety of berberine alone or combined with statins for the treatment of hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Am J Chin Med. (2019) 47:751–67. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X19500393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Fatahian A, Haftcheshmeh S. M., Azhdari S, Farshchi H. K., Nikfar B., Momtazi-Borojeni A. A. Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Cham, Springer International Publishing, (2020). 83–110, 178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Chen J, Cao J, Fang L, Liu B, Zhou Q, Sun Y, et al. Berberine derivatives reduce atherosclerotic plaque size and vulnerability in apoE−/− mice. J Transl Med. (2014) 12:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0326-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Ko YJ, Lee J-S, Park BC, Shin HM, Kim JA. Inhibitory effects of Zoagumhwan water extract and berberine on angiotensin ii-induced monocyte chemoattractant protein (Mcp)-1 expression and monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells. Vasc Pharmacol. (2007) 47:189–96. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2007.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Wu Y, Chuang S, Hong W, et al. Berberine reduces leukocyte adhesion to Lps-stimulated endothelial cells and Vcam-1 expression both in vivo and in vitro. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. (2012) 25:741–50. doi: 10.1177/039463201202500320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kim S, Izumi Y, Yano M, Hamaguchi A, Miura K, Yamanaka S, et al. Angiotensin blockade inhibits activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases in rat balloon-injured artery. Circulation. (1998) 97:1731–7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.17.1731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Roostalu U, Wong JK. Arterial smooth muscle dynamics in development and repair. Dev Biol. (2018) 435:109–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Nam J-S, Sharma AR, Nguyen LT, et al. Application of bioactive quercetin in oncotherapy: from nutrition to nanomedicine. Molecules. (2016) 21:108. doi: 10.3390/molecules21010108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Deng Q, Li XX, Fang Y, Chen X, Xue J. Therapeutic potential of quercetin as an antiatherosclerotic agent in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2020) 2020:5926381. doi: 10.1155/2020/5926381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Xiao L, Liu L, Guo X, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou F, et al. Quercetin attenuates high fat diet-induced atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice: a critical role of Nadph oxidase. Food Chem Toxicol. (2017) 105:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.03.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Xue F, Nie X, Shi J, Liu Q, Wang Z, Li X, et al. Quercetin inhibits Lps-induced inflammation and ox-Ldl-induced lipid deposition. Front Pharmacol. (2017) 8:40. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Çelik N, Vurmaz A, Kahraman A. Protective effect of quercetin on homocysteine-induced oxidative stress. Nutrition. (2017) 33:291–6. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Tian H, Liu Q, Qin S, Zong C, Zhang Y, Yao S, et al. Synthesis and cardiovascular protective effects of quercetin 7-O-sialic acid. J Cell Mol Med. (2017) 21:107–20. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 163.Dei Cas A, Spigoni V, Cito M, Aldigeri R, Ridolfi V, Marchesi E, et al. Vildagliptin, but not glibenclamide, increases circulating endothelial progenitor cell number: a 12-month randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2017) 16:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0503-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Xu Y, Sha W, Lu J, Yu S, Jin X, Chen C, et al. Danggui Liuhuang decoction ameliorates endothelial dysfunction by inhibiting the Jak2/Stat3 mediated inflammation. J Ethnopharmacol. (2024) 340:119170. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.119170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Sha W, Zhao B, Wei H, Yang Y, Yin H, Gao J, et al. Astragalus polysaccharide ameliorates vascular endothelial dysfunction by stimulating macrophage M2 polarization via potentiating Nrf2/ho-1 signaling pathway. Phytomedicine. (2023) 112:154667. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Sha W, Liu M, Sun D, Qiu J, Xu B, Chen L, et al. Resveratrol improves Gly-Ldl-induced vascular endothelial cell apoptosis, inflammatory factor secretion and oxidative stress by regulating miR-142-3p and regulating Spred2-mediated autophagy. Aging. (2021) 13:6878–89. doi: 10.18632/aging.202546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Zhang H, Lu J, Gao J, Sha W, Cai X, Rouzi MRYM, et al. Association of Monocyte-to-Hdl Cholesterol Ratio with endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Res. (2024) 2024:5287580. doi: 10.1155/2024/5287580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Wei H, Sun M, Wang R, Zeng H, Zhao B, Jin S. Puerarin mitigated Lps-Atp or hg-primed endothelial cells damage and diabetes-associated cardiovascular disease via Ros-Nlrp3 signalling. J Cell Mol Med. (2024) 28:28 (10). doi: 10.1111/jcmm.18239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Fang Y, Shi C, Manduchi E, Civelek M, Davies PF. Microrna-10a regulation of proinflammatory phenotype in athero-susceptible endothelium in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2010) 107:13450–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002120107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Fish JE, Santoro MM, Morton SU, Yu S, Yeh RF, Wythe JD, et al. miR-126 regulates angiogenic signaling and vascular integrity. Dev Cell. (2008) 15:272–84. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES