Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1997 Mar;225(3):333–338. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199703000-00014

Psychomotor skills for endoscopic manipulations: differing abilities between right and left-handed individuals.

G B Hanna 1, T Drew 1, P Clinch 1, S Shimi 1, P Dunkley 1, C Hau 1, A Cuschieri 1
PMCID: PMC1190685  PMID: 9060591

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the psychomotor aptitudes relevant to endoscopic manipulations between right-handed and left-handed subjects. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There has been little research on the psychomotor performance in relation to minimal access surgery and there are no psychomotor tests to evaluate aspects of psychomotor abilities relevant to endoscopic manipulations. METHODS: A microprocessor-controlled psychomotor tester was developed for objective evaluation of endoscopic performance. The task involved negotiating ten target holes with a probe under videoscopic imaging. Subjects consisted of two groups of 10 medical students: right- and left-handed. After a prestudy familiarization session, each subject performed two test runs with one hand, followed by two runs with the other hand. These test runs were repeated 1 week later. The outcome measures were the total execution time, force on backplate, angular deviations, error rate, and first-time accuracy. RESULTS: A significant difference in the error rate and first time accuracy was observed between subjects (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and between the dominant and nondominant hands (p < 0.001 and p < 0.025, respectively), with no significant change with practice. Right-handed subjects performed better with either hand in terms of error rate (p < 0.001) and first time accuracy (p < 0.001). Practice improved the execution time (p < 0.001) and the degree of angular deviations (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Right-handed subjects perform less errors and exhibit better first time accuracy. The parameters that improve with practice reflect the positive effect of training, whereas others, such as errors rate and first time accuracy which do not, reflect innate abilities.

Full text

PDF
333

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Annett M., Turner A. Laterality and the growth of intellectual abilities. Br J Educ Psychol. 1974 Feb;44(1):37–46. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1974.tb00764.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes R. W. Surgical handicraft: teaching and learning surgical skills. Am J Surg. 1987 May;153(5):422–427. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90783-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. James W. E., Mefferd R. B., Jr, Wieland B. A. Repetitive psychometric measures: handedness and performance. Percept Mot Skills. 1967 Aug;25(1):209–212. doi: 10.2466/pms.1967.25.1.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kutas M., McCarthy G., Donchin E. Differences between sinistrals' and dextrals' ability to infer a whole from its parts: a failure to replicate. Neuropsychologia. 1975 Oct;13(4):455–464. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(75)90069-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Levy J. Possible basis for the evolution of lateral specialization of the human brain. Nature. 1969 Nov 8;224(5219):614–615. doi: 10.1038/224614a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mc Gee M. G. Laterality, hand preference, and human spatial ability. Percept Mot Skills. 1976 Jun;42(3):781–782. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.42.3.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McGee M. G. Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychol Bull. 1979 Sep;86(5):889–918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McGlone J., Davidson W. The relation between cerebral speech laterality and spatial ability with special reference to sex and hand preference. Neuropsychologia. 1973 Jan;11(1):105–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(73)90070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller E. Handedness and the pattern of human ability. Br J Psychol. 1971 Feb;62(1):111–112. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1971.tb02018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Newcombe F., Ratcliff G. Handedness, speech lateralization and ability. Neuropsychologia. 1973 Oct;11(4):399–407. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(73)90026-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reznick R. K. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg. 1993 Mar;165(3):358–361. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80843-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schueneman A. L., Pickleman J., Freeark R. J. Age, gender, lateral dominance, and prediction of operative skill among general surgery residents. Surgery. 1985 Sep;98(3):506–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Silverman A. J., Adevai G., McGough W. E. Some relationships between handedness and perception. J Psychosom Res. 1966 Sep;10(2):151–158. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(66)90058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES