Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1997 Apr;225(4):415–421. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199704000-00011

Nonoperative management of esophageal perforations. Is it justified?

A Altorjay 1, J Kiss 1, A Vörös 1, A Bohák 1
PMCID: PMC1190750  PMID: 9114801

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Experiences obtained with nonoperative treatment (NOT), i.e. total prohibition of per oral food intake for a minimum of 7 days, administration of combinations of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and parenteral hyperalimentation, are described in the management of esophageal perforations. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The place, value, and indication of NOT in the management of esophageal perforation has not yet been unequivocally defined. As a result, contradictory data have been published regarding the outcome of NOT. METHODS: During the past 15 years (1979 to 1994), 20 of 86 patients (23.3%) with esophageal perforation have been treated nonoperatively from the outset. In this group, perforations were located to the upper, middle, and lower third of the esophagus in 50%, 30%, and 20%, respectively. In the operative management group (OT)--in which conservative (drainage, endeprothesis), reconstructive (suture, reinforced suture), and radical (resection) surgical methods were applied--lesions were preponderantly located in the lower one third of the esophagus (56.1%--37/66). As to the interval between the perforation and the onset of treatment, 14 patients had been diagnosed within 24 hours, whereas in 6 cases treatment had been begun beyond 24 hours. RESULTS: NOT could be successfully carried out in 16 patients; the decision to use NOT had to be revised in 4 other cases (Table 1). Two patients were lost; the mortality rate was 10% (2 of 20). The rate of complications was lower in the NOT group (20%, or 4 of 20) than in the OT group (50%, or 33 of 66). CONCLUSIONS: NOT can be suggested for the treatment of intramural perforations. In the case of transmural perforation, this approach should be taken into consideration if the esophageal lesion is circumscribed, is not in neoplastic tissue, is not in the abdominal cavity, and is not accompanied by simultaneous obstructive esophageal disease; in addition, symptoms and signs of septicemia should be absent.

Full text

PDF
415

Images in this article

420Figure 7.
on p.420
420Figure 8.
on p.420

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ajalat G. M., Mulder D. G. Esophageal perforations. The need for an individualized approach. Arch Surg. 1984 Nov;119(11):1318–1320. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390230084021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berry B. E., Ochsner J. L. Perforation of the esophagus. A 30 year review. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973 Jan;65(1):1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bladergroen M. R., Lowe J. E., Postlethwait R. W. Diagnosis and recommended management of esophageal perforation and rupture. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986 Sep;42(3):235–239. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62725-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown R. H., Jr, Cohen P. S. Nonsurgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation. JAMA. 1978 Jul 14;240(2):140–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron J. L., Kieffer R. F., Hendrix T. R., Mehigan D. G., Baker R. R. Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic esophageal disruptions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1979 May;27(5):404–408. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63335-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Junginger T., Schäfer W., Böttger T. Die Oesophagusperforation--Indikation zur operativen Therapie. Chirurg. 1991 Nov;62(11):800–804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Larrieu A. J., Kieffer R. Boerhaave syndrome: report of a case treated non-operatively. Ann Surg. 1975 Apr;181(4):452–454. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197504000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lyons W. S., Seremetis M. G., deGuzman V. C., Peabody J. W., Jr Ruptures and perforations of the esophagus: the case for conservative supportive management. Ann Thorac Surg. 1978 Apr;25(4):346–350. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63554-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maroney T. P., Ring E. J., Gordon R. L., Pellegrini C. A. Role of interventional radiology in the management of major esophageal leaks. Radiology. 1989 Mar;170(3 Pt 2):1055–1057. doi: 10.1148/radiology.170.3.2916056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Michel L., Grillo H. C., Malt R. A. Operative and nonoperative management of esophageal perforations. Ann Surg. 1981 Jul;194(1):57–63. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198107000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosoff L., Sr, White E. J. Perforation of the esophagus. Am J Surg. 1974 Aug;128(2):207–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Santos G. H., Frater R. W. Transesophageal irrigation for the treatment of mediastinitis produced by esophageal rupture. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Jan;91(1):57–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Swedlund A., Traube M., Siskind B. N., McCallum R. W. Nonsurgical management of esophageal perforation from pneumatic dilatation in achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Mar;34(3):379–384. doi: 10.1007/BF01536259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wesdorp I. C., Bartelsman J. F., Huibregtse K., den Hartog Jager F. C., Tytgat G. N. Treatment of instrumental oesophageal perforation. Gut. 1984 Apr;25(4):398–404. doi: 10.1136/gut.25.4.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES