Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1988 Oct;404:301–321. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017291

Double-hyperbolic force-velocity relation in frog muscle fibres.

K A Edman 1
PMCID: PMC1190827  PMID: 3267024

Abstract

1. The relationship between force and velocity of shortening was studied at 2.10 micron sarcomere length during fused tetani (1-3 degrees C) in single fibres isolated from the anterior tibialis muscle of Rana temporaria. The speed of shortening was recorded from the whole fibre and, in some experiments, simultaneously from a short (ca. 0.6 mm) segment, while the preparation was released to shorten isotonically at selected force levels ('load-clamp' recording). The segment was defined by opaque markers of hair that were placed on the fibre surface. The distance between the markers was recorded by means of a photo-electric detector system. 2. The force-velocity relation had two distinct regions, each one exhibiting an upwards concave shape, that were located within the ranges 0-78 and 78-100% of the measured isometric force (P0), respectively. The two portions of the force-velocity relation could be fitted well by hyperbolic functions or by single-exponential functions. The curvature was more pronounced in the high-force region than at low-intermediate loads. The transition between the two portions of the force-velocity relation (the 'break point' of the force-velocity curve) occurred at 78.4 +/- 0.4% of P0 (mean +/- S.E. of mean, n = 12) corresponding to 10.9 +/- 0.4% of maximum velocity of shortening (Vmax). The general shape of the force-velocity curve, and the appearance of a break point near 78% of P0, was the same when measurements were made from the whole fibre and from a short segment along the same fibre. 3. The 'negative' branch of the force-velocity relation was delineated for loads ranging from P0 to 1.6-1.8 P0 in five experiments. The negative branch formed a smooth continuation of the force-velocity relation recorded between 0.78 P0 and P0. The force-velocity relation was nearly flat between 0.90 P0 and 1.20 P0, the difference in speed of shortening or elongation being 1.8 +/- 0.3% (mean +/- S.E. of mean, n = 5) of Vmax over this range. 4. An increase in sarcomere length from 1.85 to 2.60 micron did not affect Vmax but caused a steady decrease in curvature of the force-velocity relation, both at low-intermediate loads and in the high-force range. Similar changes in shape of the force-velocity relation were produced by osmotic compression of the fibre in a Ringer solution made hypertonic by addition of 98 mM-sucrose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
301

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLINKS J. R. INFLUENCE OF OSMOTIC STRENGTH ON CROSS-SECTION AND VOLUME OF ISOLATED SINGLE MUSCLE FIBRES. J Physiol. 1965 Mar;177:42–57. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Civan M. M., Podolsky R. J. Contraction kinetics of striated muscle fibres following quick changes in load. J Physiol. 1966 Jun;184(3):511–534. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleworth D. R., Edman K. A. Changes in sarcomere length during isometric tension development in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Dec;227(1):1–17. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edman K. A., Elzinga G., Noble M. I. Critical sarcomere extension required to recruit a decaying component of extra force during stretch in tetanic contractions of frog skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1981 Oct;78(4):365–382. doi: 10.1085/jgp.78.4.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edman K. A., Hwang J. C. The force-velocity relationship in vertebrate muscle fibres at varied tonicity of the extracellular medium. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):255–272. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edman K. A., Mulieri L. A., Scubon-Mulieri B. Non-hyperbolic force-velocity relationship in single muscle fibres. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976 Oct;98(2):143–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb00234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edman K. A., Reggiani C. Redistribution of sarcomere length during isometric contraction of frog muscle fibres and its relation to tension creep. J Physiol. 1984 Jun;351:169–198. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edman K. A., Reggiani C., te Kronnie G. Differences in maximum velocity of shortening along single muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1985 Aug;365:147–163. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edman K. A. The velocity of unloaded shortening and its relation to sarcomere length and isometric force in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1979 Jun;291:143–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eisenberg E., Hill T. L. A cross-bridge model of muscle contraction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1978;33(1):55–82. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(79)90025-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Elliott G. F., Lowy J., Millman B. M. Low-angle x-ray diffraction studies of living striated muscle during contraction. J Mol Biol. 1967 Apr 14;25(1):31–45. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90277-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fenn W. O., Marsh B. S. Muscular force at different speeds of shortening. J Physiol. 1935 Nov 22;85(3):277–297. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1935.sp003318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Flitney F. W., Hirst D. G. Cross-bridge detachment and sarcomere 'give' during stretch of active frog's muscle. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:449–465. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldman Y. E. Measurement of sarcomere shortening in skinned fibers from frog muscle by white light diffraction. Biophys J. 1987 Jul;52(1):57–68. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83188-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HOWARTH J. V. The behaviour of frog muscle in hypertonic solutions. J Physiol. 1958 Nov 10;144(1):167–175. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HUXLEY A. F., NIEDERGERKE R. Structural changes in muscle during contraction; interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):971–973. doi: 10.1038/173971a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HUXLEY H. E. X-ray analysis and the problem of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1953 Mar 11;141(902):59–62. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1953.0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. HUXLEY H., HANSON J. Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):973–976. doi: 10.1038/173973a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huxley H. E. The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1356–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. JEWELL B. R., WILKIE D. R. An analysis of the mechanical components in frog's striated muscle. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):515–540. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Julian F. J. The effect of calcium on the force-velocity relation of briefly glycerinated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1971 Oct;218(1):117–145. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Katz B. The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction. J Physiol. 1939 Jun 14;96(1):45–64. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Matsubara I., Elliott G. F. X-ray diffraction studies on skinned single fibres of frog skeletal muscle. J Mol Biol. 1972 Dec 30;72(3):657–669. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90183-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Matsubara I., Goldman Y. E., Simmons R. M. Changes in the lateral filament spacing of skinned muscle fibres when cross-bridges attach. J Mol Biol. 1984 Feb 15;173(1):15–33. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90401-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Metzger J. M., Moss R. L. Shortening velocity in skinned single muscle fibers. Influence of filament lattice spacing. Biophys J. 1987 Jul;52(1):127–131. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83197-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. RITCHIE J. M., WILKIE D. R. The dynamics of muscular contraction. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 29;143(1):104–113. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sugi H., Tsuchiya T. Isotonic velocity transients in frog muscle fibres following quick changes in load. J Physiol. 1981;319:219–238. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thames M. D., Teichholz L. E., Podolsky R. J. Ionic strength and the contraction kinetics of skinned muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Apr;63(4):509–530. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.4.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tsuchiya T. Passive interaction between sliding filaments in the osmotically compressed skinned muscle fibers of the frog. Biophys J. 1988 Mar;53(3):415–423. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83118-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES