Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1988 Oct;404:591–611. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017308

Visual adaptation is highly localized in the cat's retina.

B G Cleland 1, A W Freeman 1
PMCID: PMC1190844  PMID: 3253443

Abstract

1. The aim of this study was to determine how the spatial pattern of steady light in a visual stimulus affects the state of adaptation of the retina. 2. Impulse rate was recorded from single X and Y ganglion cells in the cat's retina. The luminance of a narrow bar of light centred over the receptive field was modulated sinusoidally in time about a steady background, and a cell's contrast gain was measured as the ratio of impulse rate modulation to bar contrast. 3. The contrast gain of a cell was set by the background, a fixed luminance level about which luminance varied in the form of a grating; grating luminance varied sinusoidally with distance but did not vary in time. When the spatial frequency of the grating was low, contrast gain was increased by a grating with a trough centred over the receptive field, and decreased by a peak-centred grating. 4. As the spatial frequency of the grating increased, its effect on contrast gain disappeared. For cells around 10 deg from the central area, this change occurred at spatial frequencies close to 1 cycle deg-1. 5. For each cell the effect on contrast gain of the background's spatial frequency was compared with the spatial frequency response to a time-varying grating. It was found that the summation area for adapting light in both X and Y cells is very close in size to an X cell centre mechanism, and that the summation area for adapting light in Y cells is therefore considerably smaller than a Y cell centre. 6. From this and other evidence it was shown that sub-areas of the Y cell centre mechanism can be independently adapted. 7. A background grating with a trough centred over the receptive field raised contrast gain more at mid-range spatial frequencies than at low frequencies, producing a hump in the contrast gain versus frequency curve. A peak-centred grating reduced contrast gain more at mid-range frequencies than at low, producing a dip. 8. The dip in the contrast gain versus frequency curve for a peak-centred grating was always greater than the hump for a trough-centred grating. 9. These humps and dips were interpreted in terms of a model containing two antagonistic pathways. One pathway had a smaller summation area for adapting light than the other.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
591

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baylor D. A., Hodgkin A. L. Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol. 1974 Nov;242(3):729–758. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boynton R. M., Whitten D. N. Visual adaptation in monkey cones: recordings of late receptor potentials. Science. 1970 Dec 25;170(3965):1423–1426. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3965.1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleland B. G., Enroth-cugell C. Quantitative aspects of sensitivity and summation in the cat retina. J Physiol. 1968 Sep;198(1):17–38. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cleland B. G., Harding T. H., Tulunay-Keesey U. Visual resolution and receptive field size: examination of two kinds of cat retinal ganglion cell. Science. 1979 Sep 7;205(4410):1015–1017. doi: 10.1126/science.472720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cleland B. G., Levick W. R. Brisk and sluggish concentrically organized ganglion cells in the cat's retina. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):421–456. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cleland B. G., Levick W. R., Sanderson K. J. Properties of sustained and transient ganglion cells in the cat retina. J Physiol. 1973 Feb;228(3):649–680. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Copenhagen D. R., Green D. G. The absence of spread of adaptation between rod photoreceptors in turtle retina. J Physiol. 1985 Dec;369:161–181. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Easter S. S., Jr Adaptation in the goldfish retina. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(2):273–281. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Enroth-Cugell C., Freeman A. W. The receptive-field spatial structure of cat retinal Y cells. J Physiol. 1987 Mar;384:49–79. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Enroth-Cugell C., Hertz G., Lennie P. Cone signals in the cat's retina. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):273–296. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J. G., Schweitzer-Tong D. E., Watson A. B. Spatio-temporal interactions in cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear spatial summation. J Physiol. 1983 Aug;341:279–307. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J. G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1966 Dec;187(3):517–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FUORTES M. G., HODGKIN A. L. CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239–263. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Frishman L. J., Freeman A. W., Troy J. B., Schweitzer-Tong D. E., Enroth-Cugell C. Spatiotemporal frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Gen Physiol. 1987 Apr;89(4):599–628. doi: 10.1085/jgp.89.4.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Green D. G., Tong L., Cicerone C. M. Lateral spread of light adaptation in the rat retina. Vision Res. 1977;17(3):479–486. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90042-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hochstein S., Shapley R. M. Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(2):265–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hochstein S., Shapley R. M. Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(2):237–264. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kolb H. The organization of the outer plexiform layer in the retina of the cat: electron microscopic observations. J Neurocytol. 1977 Apr;6(2):131–153. doi: 10.1007/BF01261502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Normann R. A., Werblin F. S. Control of retinal sensitivity. I. Light and dark adaptation of vertebrate rods and cones. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Jan;63(1):37–61. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. RUSHTON W. A. VISUAL ADAPTATION. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965 Mar 16;162:20–46. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1965.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Robson J. G., Enroth-Cugell C. Light distribution in the cat's retinal image. Vision Res. 1978;18(2):159–173. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90181-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Steinberg R. H., Reid M., Lacy P. L. The distribution of rods and cones in the retina of the cat (Felis domesticus). J Comp Neurol. 1973 Mar 15;148(2):229–248. doi: 10.1002/cne.901480209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Valeton J. M., van Norren D. Light adaptation of primate cones: an analysis based on extracellular data. Vision Res. 1983;23(12):1539–1547. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90167-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Westheimer G. Spatial interaction in the human retina during scotopic vision. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(4):881–894. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES