Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1997 Jun;225(6):678–685. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199706000-00005

Proximal gastric cancers resected via a transabdominal-only approach. Results and comparisons to distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach.

L E Harrison 1, M S Karpeh 1, M F Brennan 1
PMCID: PMC1190868  PMID: 9230808

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of patients with proximal gastric cancer (PGC) treated by a transabdominal-only resection to that of patients with distal gastric cancer (DGC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It has been suggested that PGC is inherently more aggressive than DGC. The worse survival of PGC compared with that of DGC may be in part, because of the difficulty distinguishing PGC from distal esophageal adenocarcinoma. By defining a subset of PGC resected using an transabdominal-only approach, one may discriminate true PGC from distal esophageal adenocarcinoma. This subset of patients is a more appropriate comparison group when analyzing outcome relative to patients with DGC. METHODS: A review of the prospective database for gastric adenocarcinoma at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between July 1985 and August 1995 identified 98 patients with PGC resection via a transabdominal-only approach. Of these, 65 underwent proximal gastrectomy and 33 underwent total gastrectomy. For DGC, 258 required a distal gastrectomy and 71 required total gastrectomy. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival of patients with PGC was 42% (median survival, 47 months), whereas the 5-year survival for patients with DGC was 61% (median survival, 106 months, p = 0.03). Within each stage, there were no significant survival differences, but in all stages, survival was better for patients with DGC. More important, the site of the primary tumor appears to affect survival, with a worse outcome as the tumor moves proximally. CONCLUSIONS: Despite excluding distal esophageal cancers, survival for patients with PGC remains worse than for those with DGC. Late stage of presentation could not explain this difference. It appears that PGCs are inherently more aggressive than are DGCs. In addition, site of the primary tumor appears to affect outcome, with a trend toward a worse outcome as the tumor moves proximally.

Full text

PDF
678

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blot W. J., Devesa S. S., Kneller R. W., Fraumeni J. F., Jr Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA. 1991 Mar 13;265(10):1287–1289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bozzetti F., Bonfanti G., Bufalino R., Menotti V., Persano S., Andreola S., Doci R., Gennari L. Adequacy of margins of resection in gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg. 1982 Dec;196(6):685–690. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198212001-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brady M. S., Rogatko A., Dent L. L., Shiu M. H. Effect of splenectomy on morbidity and survival following curative gastrectomy for carcinoma. Arch Surg. 1991 Mar;126(3):359–364. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410270105017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Husemann B. Cardia carcinoma considered as a distinct clinical entity. Br J Surg. 1989 Feb;76(2):136–139. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jakl R. J., Miholic J., Koller R., Markis E., Wolner E. Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the cardia. Am J Surg. 1995 Mar;169(3):316–319. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80166-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Meyers W. C., Damiano R. J., Jr, Rotolo F. S., Postlethwait R. W. Adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Changing patterns over the last 4 decades. Ann Surg. 1987 Jan;205(1):1–8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198701000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moreaux J., Msika S. Carcinoma of the gastric cardia: surgical management and long-term survival. World J Surg. 1988 Apr;12(2):229–235. doi: 10.1007/BF01658061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Papachristou D. N., Agnanti N., D'Agostino H., Fortner J. G. Histologically positive esophageal margin in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 1980 May;139(5):711–713. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90369-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rohde H., Bauer P., Stützer H., Heitmann K., Gebbensleben B. Proximal compared with distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: differences and consequences. German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group. Br J Surg. 1991 Oct;78(10):1242–1248. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800781031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Salvon-Harman J. C., Cady B., Nikulasson S., Khettry U., Stone M. D., Lavin P. Shifting proportions of gastric adenocarcinomas. Arch Surg. 1994 Apr;129(4):381–389. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420280053007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Siewert J. R., Böttcher K., Stein H. J., Roder J. D., Busch R. Problem of proximal third gastric carcinoma. World J Surg. 1995 Jul-Aug;19(4):523–531. doi: 10.1007/BF00294713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stipa S., Di Giorgio A., Ferri M. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the cardia. Surgery. 1992 Apr;111(4):386–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. de Calan L., Portier G., Ozoux J. P., Rivallain B., Perrier M., Brizon J. Carcinoma of the cardia and proximal third of the stomach. Results of surgical treatment in 91 consecutive patients. Am J Surg. 1988 Mar;155(3):481–485. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80118-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES