Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2025 Mar 3;16:1528930. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1528930

A comprehensive analysis of the genomic and proteomic profiles of a megalocytivirus isolated from Larimichthys crocea

Xiaodong Liu 1,2, Hongshu Chi 1,2, Xixi Yang 1,2, Zaiyu Zheng 1,2, Chunhua Zhu 3, Yunkun Wu 1,2, Wei-Jen Chang 4,*, Hui Gong 1,2,5,*
PMCID: PMC11911517  PMID: 40099184

Abstract

Introduction

The prevalence of viral diseases has posed significant challenges to the sustainable development of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) aquaculture, with megalocytivirus being one of the primary viral pathogens affecting this species. There have been two proteomic and genomic studies regarding two members of the genus Megalocytivirus: the spotted knifejaw iridovirus (SKIV) and the infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV). However, both studies were conducted more than 10 years ago. To further investigate the pathogenesis of megalocytivirus, we sequenced the genome of the viral strain FD201807 isolated from L. crocea, and conducted a proteomics analysis.

Methods

Viral DNA was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Viral proteins from purified virions and supernatants of viral infected cells were subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis, and the expression of four viral proteins was further confirmed by Western blotting. The entire viral genome was subjected to phylogenetic and bioinformatic analyses.

Results

The FD201807 genome comprises 112,214 bp of double-stranded DNA with a G + C content of 53.53%. It contains 130 potential open reading frames, with coding capacities ranging from 41 to 1,293 amino acids. Phylogenetic analysis of the whole-genome sequence indicated that the closest known megalocytivirus related to FD201807 is Pompano iridovirus, with a sequence identity of 98.98%. Label-free proteomics analysis identified 27 viral proteins in the viral-infected cell culture supernatants and 46 viral proteins in the purified virus of FD201807. Among these, 19 viral proteins were detected in both the viral-infected cell culture supernatants and the purified virus samples, while 8 viral proteins were exclusively identified in the viral-infected cell culture supernatants. Notably, there were two proteins derived from the cultured cell line MFF-1 (mandarin fish fry cell line-1), namely cytochrome c and ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1, present in both the purified virus samples and the culture supernatant of infected cells. These cellular proteins may be associated with virus-host protein interactions and/or host cell apoptosis.

Discussion

We present the most comprehensive proteomic analysis to date of the megalocytivirus isolated from L. crocea, and help identify highly expressed proteins that may serve as future targets for immunotherapy and biochemical analysis.

Keywords: genome, megalocytivirus, Larimichthys crocea, GO analysis, proteome, electron microscopy, phylogenetic analysis

1 Introduction

The large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) is the largest marine fish species under aquaculture in China. In 2023, the annual production of large yellow croaker reached 280,997 tons, accounting for 13.66% of the national marine fish production (Wang et al., 2024). However, in recent years, viral diseases, particularly those caused by megalocytivirus from the family Iridoviridae, have increasingly posed a threat to the sustainable development of marine fish aquaculture, including Larimichthys crocea, in China.

The family Iridoviridae is a collection of large icosahedral viruses with double-stranded DNA that are classified into two subfamilies: Alphairidovirinae and Betairidovirinae. The former comprises three genera (Ranavirus, Megalocytivirus and Lymphocystivirus), whose members infect primarily bony fish, amphibians, and reptiles (Chinchar et al., 2017). A survey conducted by Wang and colleagues revealed that megalocytivirus was detected in over 50 cultured and wild marine fish species in the South China Sea (Wang et al., 2007). Iridovirid diseases exhibit a high incidence, with mortality rates reaching up to 75% in young L. crocea. Chen et al. confirmed that the epidemic deaths among L. crocea fry in the Ningde and Luoyuan districts of Fujian Province from 1999 to 2001 were attributed to iridovirid infections (Chen et al., 2003). Based on its epidemiological, histopathological, and morphological characteristics, this virus was named the large yellow croaker iridovirus (LYCIV). Since then, iridovirid infections in L. crocea have been detected across various farming areas (Wang et al., 2006, 2022), underscoring iridovirid diseases as a significant concern for the species.

To date, the genomes of 24 strains within the genus Megalocytivirus have been completely sequenced, with sizes ranging from 110 to 131 kbp. As large virus genome databases expand, understanding the expression, function, and regulation of the proteome encoded by these genomes becomes increasingly important. Insights into the protein composition of infectious viral particles, or virions, are essential for functional investigations (Van Vliet et al., 2009). Viral proteomics analysis aids in elucidating viral structure and determining modifications in protein expression during viral attachment and invasion. However, research on the protein functions of iridovirids that infect L. crocea has been limited due to a lack of suitable cell lines for viral culture. Ao et al. initially reported the sequencing of the LYCIV genome, providing annotations for a portion of its genes (Ao and Chen, 2006). Recently, Wang et al. published the complete genome sequence of LYCIV-ZS-2020 and established the virus's pathogenicity in large yellow croaker through artificial infection trials (Wang et al., 2022). Nevertheless, the proteome of the large yellow croaker iridovirus has not yet been reported. To date, the only megalocytivirus proteomes reported have been from two other strains: the spotted knifejaw iridovirus (SKIV) (Shuang et al., 2013) and the infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV) (Dong et al., 2011).

In this study, we present the complete genome of a recently characterized Megalocytivirus strain, FD201807, which was isolated in 2018 from Ningde, Fujian, China. We subjected the purified virus and the cell culture supernatant to protein identification through liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based label-free proteomics. This study integrates genomic and proteomic analyses to identify immunogenic structural proteins and membrane proteins that may play a crucial role in viral invasion, in order to help us better understand the infection mechanisms of megalocytivirus and lays the groundwork for developing subunit vaccines against this virus.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Virus origin, cultivation and observation

The virus FD201807 was isolated from the kidney of a 3-month-old juvenile L. crocea exhibiting illness in 2018. Sequencing of the major capsid protein (MCP) gene has demonstrated that FD201807 belongs to the family Iridoviridae and has been classified as a member of the genus Megalocytivirus. FD201807 was maintained and propagated in the mandarin fish fry cell line-1 (MFF-1) (Dong et al., 2008). Specifically, MFF-1 cells, provided by Sun Yat-sen University, were inoculated into 75-cm2 cell culture flasks and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), which contained 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin, at 27°C in the presence of 5% CO2. After establishing the confluent monolayer, 60 μL of the FD201807 viral suspension, with the viral loads of 2.5 × 107 copies/μL, was added. And the viral culture was maintained until an 80% cytopathic effect was observed in the MFF-1 cells. For electron microscopy, the infected cells were digested with 0.25% trypsin for 1 min, then harvested and re-suspended in a fixative solution (0.1 M cacodylate buffer containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde, pH = 7.4), after a centrifugation at 1,800 rpm for 5 min, the cells were immersed in the fixative solution. Ultrathin sections were prepared and graphed with a transmission electron microscope (JEOL JSM-6380LV, Tokyo, Japan).

2.2 Virus purification

The virus-infected cells, stored at −80°C, were subjected to three freeze-thaw cycles. Following this, the cells were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm and 4°C for 40 min, and the supernatant was collected. Precipitation was achieved by centrifugation at 150,000 g and 4°C for 2 h, after which the pellet was resuspended in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). Subsequently, 2 mL of 60%, 2 mL of 50%, 2 mL of 40%, 2 mL of 35%, and 1 mL of 30% sucrose solutions were added stepwise from the bottom to the top of ultracentrifuge tubes. The viral suspension was then gently layered on top of the sucrose gradient solution. Further centrifugation was performed at 200,000 g and 4°C for 4 h, followed by the collection of the virus within the 50% sucrose gradient range. This procedure was repeated for two additional rounds of sucrose gradient centrifugation at 150,000 g for 1 h at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of PBS. Finally, the viral suspension underwent 10 min of ultrasonication in an ice bath (power: 200 W, ultrasound: 2 s, interval: 6 s) before being stored at −80°C.

2.3 Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

Purified FD201807 virus proteins (40 μg) were analyzed using SDS-PAGE. A Mini-PROTEAN II cell system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, U.S.A.) with a 5% stacking gel and a 12% separating gel was employed for discontinuous denaturing gel electrophoresis. Following staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250, the gel was thoroughly destained, scanned, and the image was saved. The SDS-PAGE band sizes were estimated using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, U.S.A.), based on the sizes of the molecular weight markers.

2.4 Genomic DNA extraction

A total of 200 μL of purified virus suspension was utilized for the extraction of viral genomic DNA using the viral genome DNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing), in accordance with the manufacturer's protocols. The extracted viral DNA was subsequently eluted with double-distilled water (ddH2O) and stored at −20°C.

2.5 Sequencing, assembly, and analysis of FD201807 genome

The extracted viral DNA was submitted to Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. for library construction and next-generation sequencing using the Illumina Hiseq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The initial sequencing data underwent quality assessment via FastQC 0.11.2 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Quality trimming of the Illumina sequencing data was performed using Trimmomatic 0.36 (Bolger et al., 2014), resulting in a refined dataset. For de novo assembly of the Illumina sequencing data, SPAdes 3.5.0 (Bankevich et al., 2012) was utilized. Following the completion of assembly, GapFiller 1.11 (Boetzer and Pirovano, 2012) was employed to fill gaps. Sequence correction was carried out using PrInSeS-G 1.0.0 (Massouras et al., 2010), which rectified errors introduced during assembly and addressed small fragment insertions or deletions. This process yielded the FD201807 virus genome. Based on the genome sequencing data, primers were designed using Oligo 6.44 (https://www.oligo.net/downloads.html) to amplify the terminal and contiguous N sequences of the genome for sequencing and cloning purposes (Table S1). The missing portions were supplemented according to the sequencing results.

Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV, GenBank accession no. AF371960) serves as a representative strain of the genus Megalocytivirus. Utilizing ISKNV as a reference, we aligned the FD201807 genome to this reference using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 11 (Tamura et al., 2021). Significant differences were identified, and primers were designed for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and clone validation, culminating in the final FD201807 genome sequence. The circular genome schematic, which illustrates ORF distribution, GC content, and GC skew, was visualized using the BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) version 0.95 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/brig/).

Gene annotation for the viral genome was performed using the Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server. Functional gene annotation was achieved through NCBI BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and comparisons with several databases, including the Nucleotide sequence database (NT), Non-Redundant protein sequence database (NR), Swiss-Prot protein knowledgebase (SWISSPROT), Translated EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database (TREMBL), clusters of orthologous groups database (COG), and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG).

2.6 Phylogenetic tree construction and analysis

The genome sequence of FD201807 was aligned with complete gene sequences from various megalocytiviruses using the online software MAFFT (version 7.520, https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/) (Katoh et al., 2019). A phylogenetic tree was constructed utilizing the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 11 software (Tamura et al., 2021), with a bootstrap test value of 1,000 and default parameters. The evolutionary relationships between the FD201807 genome and those of other megalocytiviruses were evaluated. Detailed information regarding the megalocytivirus genomes used in this study is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of the genomic information of megalocytiviruses.

Virus Abbreviation Genome Size (bp) G+C% ORFs GenBank accession no. Reference
Red seabream iridovirus RSIV 112415 53 116 AB104413 Kurita et al., 2002
Orange-spotted grouper iridovirus OSGIV 112636 54 121 AY894343 Lu et al., 2005
Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus ISKNV 111362 55 125 AF371960 He et al., 2001
Turbot reddish body iridovirus TRBIV 110104 55 115 GQ273492 Shi et al., 2010
Rock bream iridovirus RBIV 112333 53 119 KC244182 Zhang et al., 2014
Banggai cardinalfish iridovirus BCIV 111920 55 120 MT926123 Unpublished
Giant seaperch iridovirus GSIV 112565 53 135 KT804738 Wen and Hong, 2016
Pompano iridovirus PIV 112052 53 121 MK098187 Unpublished
Three spot gourami iridovirus TSGIV 111591 56 116 MG570132 Unpublished
South American cichlid iridovirus SACIV 111347 56 116 MG570131 Unpublished
Angelfish iridovirus AFIV 111127 55 121 MK689685 Unpublished
Scale drop disease virus SDDV 131122 37 135 OM037668 Fu et al., 2021
Spotted knifejaw iridovirus SKIV 112489 53 132 ON075463 Unpublished
Large yellow croaker iridovirus LYCIV 111760 54 126 AY779031 Ao and Chen, 2006
Large yellow croaker iridovirus isolate Zhoushan LYCIV-ZS-2020 112043 54 120 MW139932 Wang et al., 2022
Megalocytivirus FD201807 FD201807 112214 54 130 OQ475017 This study

2.7 Label-free proteomics analysis of FD201807

Viruses from infected cells were purified using sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Proteins from the supernatants of virus-infected cells, and purified viruses were sent to Novogene Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) for label-free proteomics analysis. Total protein was extracted as follows: the sample was treated with an appropriate volume of protein lysis buffer (100 mM ammonium bicarbonate, 8 M urea, 0.2% SDS, pH 8.0) followed by 5 min of ultrasound treatment in an ice-water bath. After centrifugation at 12,000 g and 4°C for 15 min, the supernatant was collected, and 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to react at 56°C for 1 h. Subsequently, an adequate amount of iodoacetamide was added, and the mixture was allowed to react at room temperature in the dark for 1 h. The sample was then precipitated with four volumes of pre-cooled acetone at −20°C for 3 h, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 g and 4°C for 15 min to collect the precipitate. The precipitate was washed with 1 mL of pre-cooled acetone and centrifuged at 12,000 g and 4°C for 15 min. Following this, the precipitate was collected, air-dried, and subsequently dissolved in an appropriate volume of protein solubilization buffer (6 M urea, 100 mM triethyl ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.5). After assessing the protein quality, the sample underwent trypsin digestion and subsequent LC-MS/MS analysis. Mass spectrometry was performed using a data-dependent acquisition mode, with a full scan range from m/z 350 to 1,500 and a resolution of 60,000 (at m/z 200). The resolution for the second-level mass spectrum was set to 15,000 (at m/z 200). The resulting raw data from MS detection were designated as “.raw” files. These raw files were then imported into Proteome Discoverer 2.2 software for retrieval from the UniProt database and for peptide and protein quantification. Additional filtering was conducted using Proteome Discoverer 2.2 to enhance the quality of the analysis results and minimize the false-positive rate. Peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) with a credibility exceeding 99% were identified. Proteins that contained at least one unique peptide were classified as credible proteins. Only credible peptides and proteins were retained, and false discovery rate (FDR) validation was performed to exclude peptides and proteins with an FDR >1%.

2.8 Bioinformatics analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) annotation was performed by conducting sequence alignment (BLAST) of the identified protein sequences against six widely recognized databases: protein family databases (Pfam), Protein fingerprint database (PRINTS), Protein domain database (ProDom), Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART), Protein site database (ProSite), and Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER). This was followed by analysis using the InterProScan software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/search/sequence/).

2.9 Western blotting

Freeze-thaw infected cells were separated using 12% SDS-PAGE gels and subsequently transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. Polyclonal antibodies raised in mice against the purified recombinant proteins (VP007L, VP058L, and VP121R) were employed as primary antibodies at a dilution of 1:1,000. Additionally, a monoclonal antibody targeting VP026R, generously provided by Sun Yat-sen University, was also utilized as a primary antibody at the same dilution of 1:1,000. The PVDF membrane was then subjected to immunodetection using a secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) at a dilution of 1:10,000 (Proteintech, Wuhan, China) and was visualized through enhanced chemiluminescence.

2.10 Virus abbreviations

The names of viruses in this article are abbreviated as follows: ISKNV for Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus; PIV for Pompano iridovirus; RSIV for Red seabream iridovirus; LYCIV for Large yellow croaker iridovirus; LYCIV-ZS-2020 for Large yellow croaker iridovirus isolate Zhoushan; OSGIV for Orange-spotted grouper iridovirus; RBIV for Rock bream iridovirus; TRBIV for Turbot reddish body iridovirus; GSIV for Giant seaperch iridovirus; SACIV for South American cichlid iridovirus; SKIV for Spotted knifejaw iridovirus; TSGIV for Three spot gourami iridovirus; BCIV for Banggai cardinalfish iridovirus; AFIV for Angelfish iridovirus; and LMIV for Lateolabrax maculatus iridovirus.

3 Results

3.1 Transmission electron microscopy of viral particles

Transmission electron microscopy was conducted on FD201807-infected cells, which exhibited a pathological rate of 80%. Compared to normal MFF-1 cells (Figure 1A), abundant viral particles were observed, scattered randomly within the cytoplasm of the infected cells (Figure 1B). FD201807-infected cells also appeared larger in size than the normal MFF-1 cell, as indicated by the differences in scale bar between Figures 1A, B, which aligns with a key symptom of Megalocytivirus infection. Upon magnification, viral particles and some empty capsids with a roughly hexagonal shape and bilayer envelope were visible, exhibiting a uniform size with a diameter of approximately 150 nm (Figures 1C, D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Electron microscopic observation of the virus. (A) Transmission electron micrograph of normal MFF-1 cells (scale bar = 400 nm). (B) Ultrastructure of MFF-1 cells after infection with FD201807 (scale bar = 1 μm). (C) Higher magnification of the virions observed in (B) (scale bar = 200 nm). (D) Higher magnification of the virions observed in (C) (scale bar = 100 nm).

3.2 Determination of the FD201807 genome sequence

Illumina HiSeq sequencing yielded 20,709,962 reads with a total base count of 3,106,494,300 bp. After Tirmmomatic clipping, 19,852,088 reads, or 2,753,330,175 bp were retained, with a Q20 base rate of 97.76%. A genome of 111,110 bp was assembled by processing these reads through SPAdes for assembly (> 24,000 × coverage), GapFiller for gap completion, and PrInSeS-G for sequence correction. The ends of the viral sequences were amplified using PCR, and the sequences were determined by Sanger sequencing. The final, complete genome of FD201807 is 112,214 bp in length with a G + C content of 53.53%, slightly lower than that of ISKNV (54.78%). NCBI BLAST genome comparison demonstrated that the FD201807 viral genome shared over 90% identity with 20 other genomes from the genus Megalocytivirus. Analysis of the genome termini indicated that the FD201807 genome DNA is both circularly permuted and terminally redundant, characteristics commonly shared among members of the Iridoviridae family (Chinchar et al., 2017).

3.3 ORFs and their predicted protein products

We identified 130 putative ORFs encoding proteins with lengths ranging from 41 to 1,293 amino acids on both the sense (R) and antisense (L) DNA strands. Among these ORFs, 52 (40%) were transcribed in the forward orientation, whereas 78 (60%) were oriented in the reverse orientation (Figure 2). Each ORF's hypothetical amino acid sequence was BLAST-searched against the GenBank nr database. All ORFs matched homologous sequences within GenBank's Megalocytivirus entries, with 97 aligning fully with registered Megalocytivirus protein sequences. A substantial majority (65.4%, or 85) of FD201807 ORFs lacked predicted functions. Of the 130 ORFs, 44 encoded proteins with homology to functionally annotated proteins, and all 26 iridovirid core genes were identified. These core genes are believed to play essential roles in viral transcription, replication, and assembly (Eaton et al., 2007).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Circular representation and organization of FD201807. (A) Circos plot of FD201807. The FD201807 genome encoded 130 predicted proteins. From the outer circle to the inner circle, the figure shows predicted ORFs (red: negative chain; blue: positive chain), GC skew curve (green: positive GC skew; violet: negative GC skew), and GC content (black). (B) Arrows represent ORFs with respect to their size, location, and orientation. The green arrows represent proteins identified by LC-MS/MS.

The putative gene products of FD201807 included at least 10 enzymes involved in transcription, nucleotide metabolism, and DNA replication. These included DNA-dependent RNA polymerase subunit H (ORF002L), ribonucleotide-diphosphate reductase subunit beta (ORF027R), the two largest subunits of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (ORF031L and ORF036R), transcription elongation factor S-II (TFIIS, ORF032L), mRNA capping enzyme (ORF065L), deoxyribonucleoside kinase (ORF034R), D5 family NTPase (ORF111L), DNA polymerase (ORF023R), sucrose non-fermenting 2 (SNF2) family helicase (ORF064L), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, ORF114R), and one RNase III enzyme (ORF088R). These FD201807 genes exhibited 94–97% amino acid sequence identity to their homologs in ISKNV (Dong et al., 2011). Detailed annotation information for each ORF is provided in Table S2.

Some inferred gene products of FD201807 contained highly conserved structural domains and enzymatic active site motifs involved in protein processing and modification. For instance, ORF015R featured a serine/threonine protein kinase domain, ORF026R contained three calcium-binding epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains, and ORF117L included a tyrosine-specific protein phosphatase active site.

Notably, FD201807 displayed a unique feature on the positive strand at positions 8,313–8,319, consisting of seven adenine residues, unlike other Megalocytivirus strains, which typically have eight consecutive adenine residues. This deletion was confirmed by a separate PCR followed by Sanger sequencing, indicating a one-adenosine deletion likely resulting in a truncated ORF011L and a unique ORF010R (Figure S1).

3.4 Phylogenetic analysis

A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the complete genome sequences of megalocytiviruses within the family Iridoviridae that are available in GenBank (Figure 3). The results of the phylogenetic analysis indicated that FD201807 is classified within the RSIV genotype and is closely related to PIV and RSIV, exhibiting sequence identities of 98.98 and 98.92%, respectively. Other members of the RSIV genotype include RBIV, SKIV, OSGIV, GSIV, RSIV, LYCIV, and LYCIV-ZS-2020. Notably, two LYCIV strains are genetically distinct: one was isolated from Zhoushan in 2020 (LYCIV-ZS-2020), and the other from the Ningde area of Fujian Province in 2006 (LYCIV) (Ao and Chen, 2006). Our findings suggest that LYCIV-ZS-2020, FD201807, RSIV, and PIV form a sister clade to a group comprising four closely related megalocytiviruses: RBIV, SKIV, OSGIV, and GSIV (Figure 3). The earliest isolated strain of LYCIV (Ao and Chen, 2006) appears to be the earliest diverging member of the RSIV genotype. Additionally, AFIV, BCIV, and ISKNV constitute a monophyletic ISKNV genotype, while SACIV, TSGIV, and TRBIV are categorized under the TRBIV genotype.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Phylogenetic analyses of megalocytivirus FD201807. Neighbor-Joining tree derived from comparing full-length nucleotide sequences of FD201807 to 14 other megalocytiviruses. Branch supports are indicated by values derived from 1000 bootstrapping steps. The scale bar represents the genetic distance.

3.5 Identification of FD201807 proteins using LC-MS/MS and western blotting

The purified viral particles were subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis, which revealed approximately 22 distinct protein bands stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Based on the protein sizes obtained by LC-MS/MS analysis, we indicate the regions where various viral proteins are located in Figure 4. Notably, primary viral proteins were concentrated in bands with molecular weights above 29 kDa, while proteins below 29 kDa showed lower abundance (Figure 4). Trypsin digestion followed by LC-MS/MS analysis identified 595 peptide segments from both the purified virus and cell culture supernatant, corresponding to 141 proteins (Table S3). Most peptide segments ranged from 8 to 18 amino acids in length, with a majority of proteins exhibiting molecular weights between 10 and 60 kDa (Figure S2). Amino acid sequences were searched against the Uniprot and GenBank databases using BLAST, leading to the identification of 54 viral proteins after excluding duplicates. Of these, 47 relatively abundant proteins contained multiple peptide fragments, while smaller or low-abundance proteins, such as VP004L, VP019L, and VP021R, contained only one identifiable peptide (Table 2).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

SDS-PAGE profile and regions of FD201807 virion proteins based on the LC-MS/MS identification. M, Protein molecular weight marker (Low) (TaKaRa, Dalian, China); 1, purified FD201807 virion proteins. FD201807 proteins were separated by 12% one-dimensional SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250. The viral protein lane was divided into four slices, which, based on the comparison with a molecular marker, ranged from >97 kDa, 49–97 kDa, and 29–49 kDa to <29 kDa. Proteins were in-gel-digested with trypsin, extracted, and subjected to LC-MS/MS. The boxes on the right provide the ORF numbers of the identified proteins.

Table 2.

Virion-associated viral proteins of FD201807 identified by LC-MS/MS.

No. Protein name (ORF) Coverage (%) Protein ID Matched peptides number Predicted structure and/or function Homology to megalocytiviral ORF
RSIV ISKNV TRBIV
1 004L 6 Q4KSF3 1 No hit 390R 003L 004L
2 006L 10 A0A140G0I4 2 NLI interacting factor-like phosphatase 385R 005L 005L
3 007L 67 E5FQ63, A0A023GU66, E7DRK4, V5QQM2, V5QRG8, I6NLP5, Q1X6P6, A0A191ZDL4 72 major capsid protein 380L 006L 006L
4 008L 42 A0A140GBB8, Q8QUV3 27 TM, myristylated membrane protein 374R 007L 007L
5 015R 6 A0A140GBB9 3 serine/threonine protein kinase 349L 013R 013R
6 017R 12 A0A140GB23, A0A140G0J0 4 No hit 342L 014R 014R
7 018R 5 M1T4L7 2 No hit 333L 015R 015R
8 019L 9 A0A140G0J2 1 No hit 324R 016L 016L
9 021R 15 A0A140G0J5 1 TM - - 018R
10 024R 27 A0A140GB32 14 No hit - - -
11 025L 11 Q5DLW1, Q8B4N1 8 putative phosphatase 292R 022L 023L
12 026R 11 Q5DLW0 6 TM, laminin-type epidermal growth factor-like protein 291L 023R 024R
13 027R 7 A0A140G0K2 5 TM, ribonucleotide-diphosphate reductase subunit beta 268L 024R 025R
14 030L 9 A0A140GBC8 2 XPG/RAD2 family DNA repair protein 256R 027L 027L
15 038R 20 A0A140GB38 5 No hit 197L 036R 035R
16 039L 38 Q0IKK1 16 No hit 186R 037L 036L
17 040L 23 Q5YF49 11 No hit 180R 038L 037L
18 041R 8 M1S0R7 2 No hit 179L 039R 038R
19 042L 7 A0A140G0M0 2 No hit 171R 040L 039L
20 043L 25 A0A140GB45 7 No hit 162R 041L 040L
21 047L 7 M1T4N8 1 No hit 145R 045L 044L
22 056L 65 M1SQL6 15 2-cysteine adaptor domain-containing protein 111R 054L 051L
23 057L 35 A0A140GBD4 16 RGD, 2-cysteine adaptor domain-containing protein 106R 055L 052L
24 058L 23 A0A140GB56, Q8QUQ4 5 No hit 101R 056L 053L
25 060L 25 M1SWT0 3 No hit 097R - 055L
26 062L 18 A0A140G0P0, M1S0T3, A0A140GBD6 42 putative DNA-binding protein 077R 062L 057L
27 064L 19 M1T4P8 13 RGD, SNF2 family helicase 063R 063L 058L
28 069L 12 A0A140GB60 5 No hit 033R 068L 063L
29 072L 13 M1S0U3 6 No hit 018R 071L 065L
30 074R 10 M1TCW9 3 No hit 016L 074R 067R
31 076L 11 Q4KS82, A0A140G0Q2 14 No hit 639R 076L 069L
32 077R 12 M1S0U7 5 ankyrin repeat containing protein 641L 077R 070R
33 078R 35 Q5YF12 9 No hit 635L 078R 071R
34 081R 72 A0A140GB74 10 No hit 628L 081R 074R
35 090R 8 M1T4R8, Q8QUM2 10 No hit 589L 088R 082R
36 091L 9 A0A140GBF4 3 RGD, TM, myristylated membrane protein 575R 90.5L 083R
37 094L 26 A0A140GB82 6 No hit 569R 093L 085L
38 096L 21 A0A140GB84, A0A140G0R5 13 No hit 554R 095L 087L
39 097L 22 M1TCY2 13 No hit 550R 096L 088L
40 102L 40 Q5YEZ5 5 No hit 539R 100L 091L
41 103L 81 A0A140GB91, A0A140G0S1 22 No hit 535R 101L 092L
42 109L 3 A0A140GB97 1 No hit 506R 106L 097L
43 111L 10 Q4KS51, Q8QUK1 10 D5 family NTPase 493R 109L 099L
44 114R 8 Q4KS48 1 proliferating cell nuclear antigen(PCNA) 487L 112R 102R
45 115L 63 A0A140GBA1 16 No hit - - -
46 117L 2 M1SQQ5 1 tyrosine kinase 463R 114L 105L
47 120R 18 A0A140GBA5, A0A140G0V9 10 RGD, immediate-early protein ICP-46 458L 115R 106R
48 121R 10 M1T4T8 5 No hit 450L 117R 107R
49 122L 38 A0A140G0T3 15 No hit 436R 118L 108L
50 123L 8 K4HMB3 4 ankyrin repeat containing protein 424R 119L 109L
51 125R 8 A0A140G0T6 2 No hit 420L 121R 111R
52 127R 11 A0A1L6KVN9 5 ATPase 412L 123R 113R
53 128L 59 A0A140GBB4 11 RGD, TM 407R - -
54 130L 41 M1SQR2, G1BEX9 7 RGD, ankyrin repeat containing protein 401R 125L 115L

Core gene associated viral protein are shown in bold.

Of the 54 viral proteins, 27 were found exclusively in the purified virus, while 8 proteins (VP004L, VP019L, VP026R, VP030L, VP060L, VP074R, VP102L, and VP114R) were present only in the cell culture supernatant (Figure 5). Additionally, two host-origin proteins, cytochrome c and ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 were detected in both the MFF-1 cell culture supernatant and the purified virus.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Venn diagram of 54 proteins from the purified virus and the cell culture supernatant identified by LC-MS/MS.

Among the 54 viral proteins, 23 had functional and/or domain annotations, 6 proteins contained transmembrane domains, while another 6, including a SNF2 family helicase (VP064L), had an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif, which is linked to DNA repair (Table 2). Moreover, FD201807 ORFs 008L, 058L, and 122L are likely to encode envelope proteins, as their putative protein sequences share 97, 99, and 97% identity, respectively, with ISKNV envelope proteins 007L, 056L, and 118L (Dong et al., 2011). Notably, only three proteins (VP007L, VP078R, and VP081R) exhibited acetylation modifications.

To confirm the presence of the identified proteins, we utilized mouse antibodies as the primary antibody in Western blotting for VP007L (49.6 kDa), VP026R (100.8 kDa), VP058L (23.4 kDa), and VP121R (49.6 kDa). Samples containing the virus displayed distinct bands corresponding to the expected protein molecular weights (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Western blotting confirmed the presence of viral proteins in unpurified viral solution. (A) VP007L, (B) VP026R, (C) VP058L, (D) VP121R, and (E) ACTB. β-actin served as the internal reference.

3.6 GO annotation of identified proteome of FD201807

The 54 identified viral proteins underwent Gene Ontology (GO) classification to help gain insights into functional enrichment across biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions. The classification of biological processes indicated that viral proteins primarily participate in protein folding, oxidation–reduction, and translation processes. In terms of cellular component, the classification revealed that viral proteins predominantly originated from viral capsids, intracellular locales, and ribosomes. The molecular function classification highlighted roles in ATP binding, structural molecule activity, suggesting their involvement as structural components of ribosomes (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

GO annotation of viral proteins. The x-axis denotes the number of proteins, and the y-axis denotes the GO classification.

4 Discussion

Outbreaks of viral disease caused by megalocytivirus have frequently afflicted young L. crocea in the Fujian and Zhejiang regions of China, particularly during the summer months in recent years. With a mortality rates reaching up to 75%, megalocytivirus infections have resulted in substantial economic losses for the L. crocea aquaculture industry. This study involved the whole-genome sequencing of megalocytivirus strain FD201807. The purified virus and its cell culture supernatant were analyzed using label-free proteomics methods, and selected viral proteins were further validated through Western blotting.

In this study, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the complete genome sequence. Phylogenetic tree show that FD201807 is more closely related to PIV and RSIV. In fact, the two LYCIV sequences are distantly related, suggesting the existence of an early-diverging LYCIV genotype (Figure 3).

In previous studies, Dong et al. identified 38 virion-associated proteins from the distantly related ISKNV (Dong et al., 2011), while Shuang et al. identified 49 viral proteins from SKIV (RSIV-type megalocytivirus) (Shuang et al., 2013). In our study, we identified 54 viral proteins from both the virions and the supernatants of virus-infected cells. Notably, two host-origin proteins, ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 and cytochrome c were detected in both the cell culture supernatant and the purified virus, suggesting that they likely bind to the viral particles and are involved in host-virus interactions. Ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 is responsible for activating ubiquitin, the first step in ubiquitination. Viruses are known to hijack the host ubiquitin system by encoding ubiquitin ligases, redirecting host ligases, or regulating deubiquitinases, leading to stoichiological changes such as proteasomal degradation, protein relocalization, and regulation of protein or nucleic acid interactions: so-called non-degradative ubiquitination (Herrmann et al., 2020). There is growing evidence that ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is essential for viral infection by affecting virus entry, proliferation, transcription, assembly, release, and immune escape (Wang et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2018; Pang et al., 2021). Cytochrome c (CYC) is a kind of mitochondrial apoptogenic factors (Hu and Yao, 2016). Cytochrome c plays a crucial role in apoptosis: in Anagrapha falcifera multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AfMNPV)-induced apoptosis in Spodoptera litura cells. Inhibiting cytochrome c expression could significantly reduce AfMNPV-induced apoptosis in Sl-1 cells, resulting in decrease of caspase-3 and caspase-9 activity (Liu et al., 2007); the mitochondrial inner membrane protein cytochrome c1 was reported to interact with the nonstructural protein 4 (nsp4) of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), which was confirmed by the RNA interference experiments to be pivotal in PRRSV-induced apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2017). Our findings raised potential links between these two pathways and the megalocytivirus, suggesting that cellular apoptosis is worthy of concern in L. crocea diseases.

Eight viral proteins (VP004L, VP019L, VP026R, VP030L, VP060L, VP074R, VP102L, and VP114R) were identified exclusively in the supernatant of cell culture and may be secreted or non-structural proteins. FD201807 ORF026R encodes a laminin-type epidermal growth factor–like protein, which is a common ORF among all members of the genus Megalocytivirus. Unlike RSIV (AAQ07956), PIV (AZQ20773), LYCIV (ABI32391), RBIV (AAN86692), OSGIV (AAX82335) and LYCIV-ZS-2020 (QQA04019), FD201807 ORF026R contains a 141-nucleotide deletion between positions 21,187 and 21,188, resulting in a truncated protein VP026R (Figure S3). VP23R of ISKNV is homologous to VP026R and, although not a viral envelope protein, is expressed on the plasma membrane of ISKNV-infected cells. ISKNV VP23R interacts with extracellular nidogen-1 to form the virus-mock basement membrane. The heptapeptide sequence “NIDDNPV” within ISKNV VP23R, crucial for its interaction with the basement membrane protein nidogen-1 (Xu et al., 2010), is also present in FD201807 VP026R, guiding future studies on the pathogenic mechanisms of megalocytiviruses. FD201807 VP030L belongs to the XPG/RAD2 family DNA repair protein, and VP114R is a type of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which is a key factor in DNA replication and cell cycle regulation in yeast, plant, and animal cells (Strzalka and Ziemienowicz, 2011). The other five proteins, however, have not been functionally characterized in megalocytiviruses, presenting potential directions for future research.

Proteomics analysis of FD201807 identified 17 of the 26 core gene-associated viral proteins from the family Iridoviridae. Further analysis of the FD201807 genome revealed the other nine undetected core gene-associated viral proteins that included DNA polymerase, DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, deoxyribonucleoside kinase, and Erv1/Alr family proteins (essential for respiration and liver regeneration). These non-structural proteins are involved in DNA and RNA syntheses and regulations. They may have differential expression patterns or could be expressed at levels too low to be detected in this study.

This study enriched the genome and proteome data of large yellow croaker iridovirus, and provided a reference for the study of the infection mechanism of large yellow croaker iridovirus and the development of vaccines.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD2401002), Foreign Cooperation Project of Fujian Province Science and Technology Program (2024I0036), Special Fund for Marine Development of Fujian Province (FJHJF-L-2022-10), Basic Scientific Research Projects of Public Welfare Research Institutes In Fujian Province (2022R1027004, 2021R1027003, and 2020R1027004).

W-JC is supported by the Winslow Chair in Modern Science endowment at Hamilton College.

Data availability statement

The complete genome sequence of megalocytivirus FD201807 was deposited in NCBI under BioProject ID PRJNA931111 and the accession number OQ475017. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD039383.

Author contributions

XL: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HC: Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. XY: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. ZZ: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. CZ: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YW: Writing – review & editing. W-JC: Writing – review & editing. HG: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1528930/full#supplementary-material

Table_1.docx (25.3KB, docx)
Table_2.docx (74.1KB, docx)
Table_3.docx (24.2KB, docx)
Image_1.tif (367.1KB, tif)
Image_2.tif (291.6KB, tif)
Image_3.tif (260.9KB, tif)

References

  1. Ao J., Chen X. (2006). Identification and characterization of a novel gene encoding an RGD-containing protein in large yellow croaker iridovirus. Virology 355, 213–222. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bankevich A., Nurk S., Antipov D., Gurevich A. A., Dvorkin M., Kulikov A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boetzer M., Pirovano W. (2012). Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller. Genome Biol. 13:R56. 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolger A. M., Lohse M., Usadel B. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen X. H., Lin K. B., Wang X. W. (2003). Outbreaks of an iridovirus disease in maricultured large yellow croaker, Larimichthys crocea (Richardson), in China. J. Fish Dis. 26, 615–619. 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00494.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chinchar V. G., Hick P., Ince I. A., Jancovich J. K., Marschang R., Qin Q., et al. (2017). ICTV virus taxonomy profile: iridoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 98, 890–891. 10.1099/jgv.0.000818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong C., Weng S., Shi X., Xu X., Shi N., He J. (2008). Development of a mandarin fish Siniperca chuatsi fry cell line suitable for the study of infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV). Virus Res. 135, 273–281. 10.1016/j.virusres.2008.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong C. F., Xiong X. P., Shuang F., Weng S. P., Zhang J., Zhang Y., et al. (2011). Global landscape of structural proteins of infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus. J. Virol. 85, 2869–2877. 10.1128/JVI.01444-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eaton H. E., Metcalf J., Penny E., Tcherepanov V., Upton C., Brunetti C. R. (2007). Comparative genomic analysis of the family Iridoviridae: re-annotating and defining the core set of iridovirus genes. Virol. J. 4:11. 10.1186/1743-422X-4-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fu Y., Li Y., Fu W., Su H., Zhang L., Huang C., et al. (2021). Scale drop disease virus associated yellowfin seabream (Acanthopagrus latus) ascites diseases, Zhuhai, Guangdong, Southern China: the first description. Viruses 13:1617. 10.3390/v13081617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. He J. G., Deng M., Weng S. P., Li Z., Zhou S. Y., Long Q. X., et al. (2001). Complete genome analysis of the mandarin fish infectious spleen and kidney necrosis iridovirus. Virology 291, 126–139. 10.1006/viro.2001.1208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herrmann C., Dybas J. M., Liddle J. C., Price A. M., Hayer K. E., Lauman R., et al. (2020). Adenovirus-mediated ubiquitination alters protein-RNA binding and aids viral RNA processing. Nat Microbiol 5, 1217–1231. 10.1038/s41564-020-0750-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hu W. Y., Yao C. L. (2016). Molecular and immune response characterizations of a novel AIF and cytochrome c in Litopenaeus vannamei defending against WSSV infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 56, 84–95. 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.06.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang X., Wei S., Ni S., Huang Y., Qin Q. (2018). Ubiquitin-proteasome system is required for efficient replication of Singapore grouper iridovirus. Front. Microbiol. 9:2798. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Katoh K., Rozewicki J., Yamada K. D. (2019). MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 20, 1160–1166. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kurita J., Nakajima K., Hirono I., Aoki T. (2002). Complete genome sequencing of red sea bream iridovirus (RSIV). Fish. Sci. 68, 1113–1115. 10.2331/fishsci.68.sup2_1113 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu L., Peng J., Liu K., Yang H., Li Y., Hong H. (2007). Influence of cytochrome c on apoptosis induced by Anagrapha (Syngrapha) falcifera multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AfMNPV) in insect Spodoptera litura cells. Cell Biol Int. 31, 996–1001. 10.1016/j.cellbi.2007.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu L., Zhou S. Y., Chen C., Weng S. P., Chan S. M., He J. G. (2005). Complete genome sequence analysis of an iridovirus isolated from the orange-spotted grouper, Epinephelus coioides. Virology 339, 81–100. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Massouras A., Hens K., Gubelmann C., Uplekar S., Decouttere F., Rougemont J., et al. (2010). Primer-initiated sequence synthesis to detect and assemble structural variants. Nat. Methods 7, 485–486. 10.1038/nmeth.f.308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pang Y., Li M., Zhou Y., Liu W., Tao R., Zhang H., et al. (2021). The ubiquitin proteasome system is necessary for efficient proliferation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Vet. Microbiol. 253:108947. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shi C. Y., Jia K. T., Yang B., Huang J. (2010). Complete genome sequence of a Megalocytivirus (family Iridoviridae) associated with turbot mortality in China. Virol. J. 7:159. 10.1186/1743-422X-7-159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shuang F., Luo Y., Xiong X.-P., Weng S., Li Y., He J., et al. (2013). Virions proteins of an RSIV-type megalocytivirus from spotted knifejaw Oplegnathus punctatus (SKIV-ZJ07). Virology 437, 89–99. 10.1016/j.virol.2012.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Strzalka W., Ziemienowicz A. (2011). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a key factor in DNA replication and cell cycle regulation. Ann. Botany 107, 1127–1140. 10.1093/aob/mcq243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tamura K., Stecher G., Kumar S. (2021). MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Vliet K., Mohamed M. R., Zhang L., Villa N. Y., Werden S. J., Liu J., et al. (2009). Poxvirus proteomics and virus-host protein interactions. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 730–749. 10.1128/MMBR.00026-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang D., Gao H. Q., Song D. D., Wu F. X. (2024). China Fishery Statistical Yearbook: 2024. Beijing: China Agricultural Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang G., Luan Y., Wei J., Li Y., Shi H., Cheng H., et al. (2022). Genetic and pathogenic characterization of a new iridovirus isolated from cage-cultured large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) in China. Viruses 14:208. 10.3390/v14020208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang S., Liu H., Zu X., Liu Y., Chen L., Zhu X., et al. (2016). The ubiquitin-proteasome system is essential for the productive entry of Japanese encephalitis virus. Virology 498, 116–127. 10.1016/j.virol.2016.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang X. W., Ao J. Q., Li Q. G., Chen X. H. (2006). Quantitative detection of a marine fish iridovirus isolated from large yellow croaker, Pseudosciaena crocea, using a molecular beacon. J. Virol. Methods 133, 76–81. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.10.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang Y. Q., Lu L., Weng S. P., Huang J. N., Chan S. M., He J. G. (2007). Molecular epidemiology and phylogenetic analysis of a marine fish infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus-like (ISKNV-like) virus. Arch. Virol. 152, 763–773. 10.1007/s00705-006-0870-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wen C.-M., Hong J.-R. (2016). Complete genome sequence of a giant sea perch iridovirus in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Genome Announc. 4:e01759. 10.1128/genomeA.01759-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xu X., Weng S., Lin T., Tang J., Huang L., Wang J., et al. (2010). VP23R of infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus mediates formation of virus-mock basement membrane to provide attaching sites for lymphatic endothelial cells. J. Virol. 84, 11866–11875. 10.1128/JVI.00990-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang B. C., Zhang J., Sun L. (2014). In-depth profiling and analysis of host and viral microRNAs in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) infected with megalocytivirus reveal involvement of microRNAs in host-virus interaction in teleost fish. BMC Genomics 15, 878. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang F., Gao P., Ge X.-N., Zhou L., Guo X., Yang H.-C. (2017). Critical role of cytochrome c1 and its cleavage in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus nonstructural protein 4-induced cell apoptosis via interaction with nsp4. J. Integr. Agric. 16, 2573–2585. 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61670-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table_1.docx (25.3KB, docx)
Table_2.docx (74.1KB, docx)
Table_3.docx (24.2KB, docx)
Image_1.tif (367.1KB, tif)
Image_2.tif (291.6KB, tif)
Image_3.tif (260.9KB, tif)

Data Availability Statement

The complete genome sequence of megalocytivirus FD201807 was deposited in NCBI under BioProject ID PRJNA931111 and the accession number OQ475017. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD039383.


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES