Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1998 Mar;227(3):343–350. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199803000-00005

Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and postlaparoscopic eras.

J A Shea 1, J A Berlin 1, D R Bachwich 1, R N Staroscik 1, P F Malet 1, M McGuckin 1, J S Schwartz 1, J J Escarce 1
PMCID: PMC1191271  PMID: 9527056

Abstract

PURPOSE: Examine changing patient characteristics and surgical outcomes for patients undergoing cholecystectomy at five community hospitals in 1989 and 1993. PROCEDURES: In a retrospective chart review, data were gathered regarding gallstone disease severity, type of admission, patient age, number of comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification, length of stay, and multiple outcomes of surgery. MAIN FINDINGS: The volume of nonincidental cholecystectomies increased 26%, from 1611 in 1989 to 2031 in 1993. Nearly all of the increase occurred among patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis and with elective admissions. In 1993, lengths of stay were significantly shorter and percentages of complications were significantly lower for infectious, cardiac, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal complications when controlling for patient case-mix characteristics. There were more major intraoperative complications (unintended wounds or injuries to the common bile duct, bowel, blood vessel(s), or other organs) in 1993. CONCLUSIONS: Different types of patients underwent cholecystectomy in 1993 compared with patients in 1989, which supports the hypothesis of changing thresholds. Statements supporting the safety of cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era were borne out when controlling for differences in patient characteristics.

Full text

PDF
343

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abboud P. A., Malet P. F., Berlin J. A., Staroscik R., Cabana M. D., Clarke J. R., Shea J. A., Schwartz J. S., Williams S. V. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Oct;44(4):450–455. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70098-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baird D. R., Wilson J. P., Mason E. M., Duncan T. D., Evans J. S., Luke J. P., Ruben D. M., Lucas G. W. An early review of 800 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at a university-affiliated community teaching hospital. Am Surg. 1992 Mar;58(3):206–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barkun J. S., Barkun A. N., Meakins J. L. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):455–458. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80940-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berggren U., Gordh T., Grama D., Haglund U., Rastad J., Arvidsson D. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Br J Surg. 1994 Sep;81(9):1362–1365. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlson M. E., Pompei P., Ales K. L., MacKenzie C. R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DRIPPS R. D., LAMONT A., ECKENHOFF J. E. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA. 1961 Oct 21;178:261–266. doi: 10.1001/jama.1961.03040420001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deyo R. A., Cherkin D. C., Ciol M. A. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613–619. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Escarce J. J., Bloom B. S., Hillman A. L., Shea J. A., Schwartz J. S. Diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among general surgeons in the United States. Med Care. 1995 Mar;33(3):256–271. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199503000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Escarce J. J., Chen W., Schwartz J. S. Falling cholecystectomy thresholds since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1995 May 24;273(20):1581–1585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fendrick A. M., Escarce J. J., McLane C., Shea J. A., Schwartz J. S. Hospital adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Med Care. 1994 Oct;32(10):1058–1063. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199410000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hardy K. J., Miller H., Fletcher D. R., Jones R. M., Shulkes A., McNeil J. J. An evaluation of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Med J Aust. 1994 Jan 17;160(2):58–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Larson G. M., Vitale G. C., Casey J., Evans J. S., Gilliam G., Heuser L., McGee G., Rao M., Scherm M. J., Voyles C. R. Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients. Am J Surg. 1992 Feb;163(2):221–226. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90105-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Legorreta A. P., Silber J. H., Costantino G. N., Kobylinski R. W., Zatz S. L. Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1993 Sep 22;270(12):1429–1432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McMahon A. J., Russell I. T., Baxter J. N., Ross S., Anderson J. R., Morran C. G., Sunderland G., Galloway D., Ramsay G., O'Dwyer P. J. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1994 Jan 15;343(8890):135–138. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90932-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Orlando R., 3rd, Russell J. C., Lynch J., Mattie A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry. Arch Surg. 1993 May;128(5):494–499. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170024002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Phillips E. H., Carroll B. J., Fallas M. J., Pearlstein A. R. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese and non-obese patients. Am Surg. 1994 May;60(5):316–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schlumpf R., Klotz H. P., Wehrli H., Herzog U. A nation's experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Prospective multicenter analysis of 3722 cases. Surg Endosc. 1994 Jan;8(1):35–41. doi: 10.1007/BF02909491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shea J. A., Healey M. J., Berlin J. A., Clarke J. R., Malet P. F., Staroscik R. N., Schwartz J. S., Williams S. V. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1996 Nov;224(5):609–620. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199611000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Soper N. J., Stockmann P. T., Dunnegan D. L., Ashley S. W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new 'gold standard'? Arch Surg. 1992 Aug;127(8):917–923. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420080051008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spaw A. T., Reddick E. J., Olsen D. O. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):2–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Steiner C. A., Bass E. B., Talamini M. A., Pitt H. A., Steinberg E. P. Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):403–408. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stoker M. E., Vose J., O'Mara P., Maini B. S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A clinical and financial analysis of 280 operations. Arch Surg. 1992 May;127(5):589–595. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420050117015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wherry D. C., Rob C. G., Marohn M. R., Rich N. M. An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of Defense. Ann Surg. 1994 Nov;220(5):626–634. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199411000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES