Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1998 Jul;228(1):59–63. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199807000-00009

Postsurgical surveillance of colon cancer: preliminary cost analysis of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen testing, chest x-ray, and colonoscopy.

R A Graham 1, S Wang 1, P J Catalano 1, D G Haller 1
PMCID: PMC1191428  PMID: 9671067

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study is the first to examine the relative and absolute costs of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assessment, chest x-ray, and colonoscopy in detecting recurrent disease in patients who have undergone surgical resection for primary colon carcinoma. METHODS: Of the 1356 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group patients in Intergroup Protocol 0089 who underwent surgical resection for Dukes' B2 and C colon carcinoma, 421 patients who developed recurrent disease were reviewed. Follow-up testing was performed according to protocol guidelines, with the cost of each test equal to 1995 Medicare reimbursement. Follow-up was defined as the time to recurrence for the 421 patients in whom disease recurred (mean 18.6 months) or up to 5 years for the additional 930 patients in whom disease did not recur (mean 38.6 months). Patients were divided into three categories: nonrecurrent, recurrent but not resectable, and recurrent but resectable with curative intent. The estimated mean cost of each test in detecting group 3 (recurrent but resectable) patients was calculated. RESULTS: Of the 421 patients who developed recurrent disease, 96 underwent surgical resection of their disease with curative intent (group 3). For group 3 patients, the first indication of recurrent disease was CEA testing (30), chest x-ray (12), colonoscopy (14), and other (40). Of the 40 "other" patients, 24 presented with symptoms. Routine physician examination, however, failed to identify a single resectable recurrence, and the total cost for physician examination was $418,615. The detection rate for CEA testing was 2.2%, the total cost was $170,880, and the cost per recurrence was $5,696. The detection rate for chest x-ray was 0.9%, the total cost was $120,934, and the cost per recurrence was $10,078. The detection rate of colonoscopy was 1%, the total cost was $641,344, and the cost per recurrence was $45,810. CONCLUSIONS: CEA measurement was the most cost-effective test in detecting potentially curable recurrent disease. Physician visits were useful only in the evaluation of symptoms; a routine physician examination had no added benefit.

Full text

PDF
59

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASTLER V. B., COLLER F. A. The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg. 1954 Jun;139(6):846–852. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195406000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beart R. W., Jr, O'Connell M. J. Postoperative follow-up of patients with carcinoma of the colon. Mayo Clin Proc. 1983 Jun;58(6):361–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berge T., Ekelund G., Mellner C., Pihl B., Wenckert A. Carcinoma of the colon and rectum in a defined population. An epidemiological, clinical and postmortem investigation of colorectal carcinoma and coexisting benign polyps in Malmö, Sweden. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1973;438:1–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruinvels D. J., Stiggelbout A. M., Kievit J., van Houwelingen H. C., Habbema J. D., van de Velde C. J. Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1994 Feb;219(2):174–182. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199402000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cochrane J. P., Williams J. T., Faber R. G., Slack W. W. Value of outpatient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel. Br Med J. 1980 Mar 1;280(6214):593–595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6214.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deveney K. E., Way L. W. Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1984 Dec;148(6):717–722. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90423-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galandiuk S., Wieand H. S., Moertel C. G., Cha S. S., Fitzgibbons R. J., Jr, Pemberton J. H., Wolff B. G. Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Jan;174(1):27–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hughes K. S., Rosenstein R. B., Songhorabodi S., Adson M. A., Ilstrup D. M., Fortner J. G., Maclean B. J., Foster J. H., Daly J. M., Fitzherbert D. Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases. A multi-institutional study of long-term survivors. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988 Jan;31(1):1–4. doi: 10.1007/bf02552560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelly C. J., Daly J. M. Colorectal cancer. Principles of postoperative follow-up. Cancer. 1992 Sep 1;70(5 Suppl):1397–1408. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70:3+<1397::aid-cncr2820701531>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lautenbach E., Forde K. A., Neugut A. I. Benefits of colonoscopic surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1994 Aug;220(2):206–211. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199408000-00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Minton J. P., Hoehn J. L., Gerber D. M., Horsley J. S., Connolly D. P., Salwan F., Fletcher W. S., Cruz A. B., Jr, Gatchell F. G., Oviedo M. Results of a 400-patient carcinoembryonic antigen second-look colorectal cancer study. Cancer. 1985 Mar 15;55(6):1284–1290. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850315)55:6<1284::aid-cncr2820550622>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Olak J., Wexler M. J., Rodriguez J., McLean A. P. Hepatic resection for metastatic disease. Can J Surg. 1986 Nov;29(6):435–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ovaska J., Järvinen H., Kujari H., Perttilä I., Mecklin J. P. Follow-up of patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1990 Jun;159(6):593–596. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(06)80074-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Patchett S. E., Mulcahy H. E., O'Donoghue D. P. Colonoscopic surveillance after curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1993 Oct;80(10):1330–1332. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Petrelli N. J., Nambisan R. N., Herrera L., Mittelman A. Hepatic resection for isolated metastasis from colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1985 Feb;149(2):205–209. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(85)80065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pommier R., Woltering E. A. Follow-up of patients after primary colorectal cancer resection. Semin Surg Oncol. 1991 May-Jun;7(3):129–132. doi: 10.1002/ssu.2980070303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Safi F., Link K. H., Beger H. G. Is follow-up of colorectal cancer patients worthwhile? Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jul;36(7):636–644. doi: 10.1007/BF02238589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Steele G., Jr Follow-up plans after treatment of primary colon and rectum cancer. World J Surg. 1991 Sep-Oct;15(5):583–588. doi: 10.1007/BF01789202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Steele G., Jr Standard postoperative monitoring of patients after primary resection of colon and rectum cancer. Cancer. 1993 Jun 15;71(12 Suppl):4225–4235. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930615)71:12+<4225::aid-cncr2820711811>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sugarbaker P. H., Gianola F. J., Dwyer A., Neuman N. R. A simplified plan for follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer supported by prospective studies of laboratory and radiologic test results. Surgery. 1987 Jul;102(1):79–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vernava A. M., 3rd, Longo W. E., Virgo K. S., Coplin M. A., Wade T. P., Johnson F. E. Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer. Results of a survey of members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Jun;37(6):573–583. doi: 10.1007/BF02050993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wanebo H. J., Llaneras M., Martin T., Kaiser D. Prospective monitoring trial for carcinoma of colon and rectum after surgical resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Dec;169(6):479–487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Winawer S. J., Zauber A. G., O'Brien M. J., Ho M. N., Gottlieb L., Sternberg S. S., Waye J. D., Bond J., Schapiro M., Stewart E. T. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 1;328(13):901–906. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304013281301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES