Skip to main content
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery logoLink to Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
. 2025 Mar 15;28(1):25–35. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2025.28.1.25

Laparoscopic and robotic surgery for colorectal cancer in Korea: a nationwide health insurance database analysis from 2019 to 2023

Eun Ji Park 1, Hyun Gu Lee 1, Youn Young Park 1, Sun Jin Park 1,, Kil Yeon Lee 1, Suk-Hwan Lee 1
PMCID: PMC11914830  PMID: 40090374

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined nationwide data regarding laparoscopic and robotic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Korea.

Methods

Nationwide data concerning patients who underwent surgery for CRC from 2019 to 2023 were obtained from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database.

Results

From 2019 to 2023, a total of 109,573 patients with CRC underwent surgical resection in Korea. Among these, open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery comprised 17.2%, 71.5%, and 11.3%, respectively. Open surgery decreased from 18.3% in 2019 to 15.2% in 2023, whereas robotic surgery increased from 10.3% in 2019 to 12.7% in 2023. Regarding rectal cancer, the rate of robotic surgery increased from 23.0% in 2019 to 28.2% in 2023, and the rate of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) increased from 86.9% in 2019 to 89.2% in 2023. Patients with National Health Insurance had significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay after surgery than those with medical aid for all surgical methods (p < 0.0001). With respect to hospital size, 74,282 CRC surgeries (67.8%) were performed in tertiary general hospitals and 33,050 (30.2%) in general hospitals. By the region, 47,140 cases (43.0%) were performed in Seoul, 19,961 (18.2%) in Gyeonggi, and 7,417 (6.8%) in Daegu. Ostomy was created in 16,222 CRC surgeries (14.8%).

Conclusion

The rate of MIS adoption for CRC in Korea has increased, reaching 84.7% in 2023. The rate of laparoscopic surgery exceeded 70% and has plateaued. In contrast, the rate of robotic surgery adoption has steadily increased, particularly for rectal cancer, where it surpassed 28% in 2023.

Keywords: Colorectal surgery, Laparoscopy, Robotic surgical procedures, Big data, Korea

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in Korea, with approximately 32,751 newly diagnosed cases in 2021 [1]. The crude incidence rate of CRC was 63.8 per 100,000 people (74.8 in males and 52.9 in females) in 2021 [1]. Similar to most cancers, CRC incidence increases with age, such that it was the most common cancer in women aged >75 years in 2021 [1]. The 5-year relative survival rate for CRC was 74.3% among patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2021 [1].

The laparoscopic approach has been established as the first-choice treatment for CRC, with oncologic outcomes equivalent to those of conventional open surgery [2,3]. Korea has experienced particularly rapid adoption of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) across various surgical fields [4]. Previous studies have demonstrated the successful implementation of laparoscopic surgery in Korea, where resection rates for CRC increased from 42.6% in 2008 to 64.9% in 2013 and 78.5% in 2018 [5,6]. Robotic surgery has emerged as an alternative minimally invasive approach, although its benefits for complex rectal procedures have not been fully established [7,8]. A recent nationwide study showed that the rate of robotic surgery adoption for intersphincteric resection substantially increased from < 5% in 2007 to >40% in 2014 [4]. However, because robotic surgery for CRC is not covered by health insurance in Korea, detailed nationwide data have not yet been reported.

The utilization patterns of surgical methods are expected to vary across regions and hospital settings. Additionally, an understanding of contemporary surgical trends and the identification of differences in MIS utilization based on population characteristics are crucial considerations for healthcare policy planning. This study aimed to analyze nationwide trends and regional variations in surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic, and robotic) for CRC in Korea from 2019 to 2023 using a comprehensive national database.

METHODS

Nationwide data for patients who were hospitalized and underwent surgical resection for CRC from 2019 to 2023 were requested and provided through the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) (https://opendata.hira.or.kr, project number: M20241028001). Researchers with access rights can retrieve data from the HIRA database for a pre-approved period. Data are searched and analyzed using the statistical program specified in the data request. The dataset included the following information: year of surgical treatment, sex, age group (10-year intervals), main disease code, procedure fee code, number of procedures, date of procedures, type of surgery (open or laparoscopic), duration of hospital stay, type of hospital (tertiary general hospital, general hospital, hospital, or clinic), and hospital region.

As previously described [5,6], the following data collection criteria were used (Table 1): (1) Data were electronically extracted based on the day of surgical treatment covered by the National Health Insurance (NHI), Medical Aid Program (MAP), or Korean veterans’ benefits. (2) Surgical procedures included all colectomies, colorectal resections, abdominoperineal resections, and total proctocolectomies with or without lymph node dissection. The procedure fee codes searched were QA671–673, QA679, QA921–926, QA928, Q0292, Q1261–1262, Q2671–2673, Q2679, Q2921–2928, and Q0292. (3) CRC cases were classified according to the Korean Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, including colon cancers stratified by location, rectosigmoid junction cancer, and rectal cancer (corresponding disease codes: C18.0–18.9, C19, and C20, respectively). (4) Because robotic surgery is not covered by Korean health insurance, direct data collection was not possible. Therefore, robotic surgery was indirectly estimated using the following criteria: patients with a CRC diagnosis were presumed to have undergone robotic surgery if they (a) were hospitalized, and (b) had general anesthesia fees (L1211, L1212), (c) had histopathology examination fees for surgical resection of malignant tumor (C5605, C5606, C5607), and (d) lacked the surgical procedure fees listed above.

Table 1.

HIRA database search conditions

Period January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2023
Patient Medical inpatients
Health insurance National Health Insurance, Medical Aid, Veterans’ benefits
Type of hospital Tertiary general hospital, General hospital, Hospital, Clinic, Health care center
Location of hospital All in Korea
Disease code Main disease: C18, C19, C20
Procedure code, operation Hemicolectomy: QA671, Q2671
Subtotal colectomy: Q1261, Q1262
Total colectomy: QA672, Q2672
Segmental resection: QA673, Q2673
Hartmann procedure: QA679, Q2679
Anterior resection: QA921, Q2921
Low anterior resection: Q2927, QA922, Q2922
Intersphincteric resection: Q0292
Ultra low anterior resection: QA928, Q2928
Abdominoperineal resection: QA923, Q2923
Pull-through operation: QA924, Q2924
Total proctocolectomy with ileostomy: QA925, Q2925
Total proctocolectomy with IPAA: QA926, Q2926
Laparoscopy material cost N0031001
Procedure code, anesthesia L1211, L1212
Procedure code, pathology C5605, C5606, C5607
Procedure code, ostomy Q2791, Q2792, Q2793, Q2794

HIRA, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service; IPAA, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

In this study, SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute) was used for data search and analysis. Analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze statistical differences in the mean length of hospital stay after CRC surgery.

RESULTS

Among patients who were diagnosed with CRC and hospitalized from 2019 to 2023, 109,573 underwent colorectal resection surgery in Korea (Table 2). Of these, 78,349 (71.5%) underwent laparoscopic surgery and 12,367 (11.3%) underwent robotic surgery. Over the 5-year period, the number and proportion of open surgeries gradually decreased, laparoscopic surgery remained stable without substantial changes, and robotic surgery gradually increased. When tumor location was categorized as left colon, right colon, or rectum, the proportion of open surgery was highest in the right colon and lowest in the rectum. The proportion of robotic surgery was highest in the rectum. In 2020, the rate of open surgery temporarily increased, whereas the rates of laparoscopic and robotic surgery decreased before increasing again. According to tumor location, the proportion of rectal cancer surgeries was 28.2%, and the most frequently operated colon cancer sites were, in descending order, the sigmoid colon, ascending colon, and rectosigmoid colon (Table 3). The age and sex distributions of patients who underwent CRC surgery were examined (Table 4). In total, 64,954 CRC surgeries (59.3%) were performed in male patients and 44,619 were performed in female patients. The highest frequencies of CRC surgeries occurred in men in their 60s, and women in their 70s.

Table 2.

Annual number and proportion of surgery for colorectal cancer from 2019 to 2023 in Korea

Location Type of surgery Year Total
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
All of the colon and rectum Open 3,991 (18.3) 3,984 (18.9) 3,896 (17.0) 3,715 (16.6) 3,271 (15.2) 18,857 (17.2)
Laparoscopic 15,569 (71.3) 14,901 (70.8) 16,422 (71.7) 16,003 (71.5) 15,454 (72.0) 78,349 (71.5)
Robotic 2,247 (10.3) 2,149 (10.2) 2,590 (11.3) 2,652 (11.9) 2,729 (12.7) 12,367 (11.3)
Total 21,807 21,034 22,908 22,370 21,454 109,573
Right colona) Open 1,299 (21.9) 1,364 (23.6) 1,340 (21.0) 1,309 (21.0) 1,086 (18.1) 6,398 (21.1)
Laparoscopic 4,375 (73.9) 4,196 (72.6) 4,757 (74.5) 4,641 (74.5) 4,650 (77.4) 22,619 (74.6)
Robotic 246 (4.2) 222 (3.8) 288 (4.5) 279 (4.5) 272 (4.5) 1,307 (4.3)
Total 5,920 5,782 6,385 6,229 6,008 30,324
Left colonb) Open 1,611 (18.7) 1,630 (19.3) 1,538 (17.0) 1,440 (16.4) 1,305 (15.8) 7,524 (17.4)
Laparoscopic 6,509 (75.4) 6,311 (74.7) 6,911 (76.6) 6,741 (76.9) 6,309 (76.2) 32,781 (76.0)
Robotic 508 (5.9) 513 (6.1) 576 (6.4) 586 (6.7) 668 (8.1) 2,851 (6.7)
Total 8,628 8,454 9,025 8,767 8,282 43,156
Rectum Open 806 (13.2) 767 (13.2) 796 (12.3) 752 (11.8) 665 (10.8) 3,786 (12.2)
Laparoscopic 3,915 (63.9) 3,739 (64.1) 4,068 (63.0) 3,881 (61.1) 3,751 (61.0) 19,354 (62.6)
Robotic 1,408 (23.0) 1,323 (22.7) 1,597 (24.7) 1,717 (27.0) 1,731 (28.2) 7,776 (25.2)
Total 6,129 5,829 6,461 6,350 6,147 30,916

Values are presented as number only or number (%).

Colons, of any site, overlapping lesions, and unspecified lesions were excluded from the right or left colon.

a)Includes cecum, appendix, ascending, hepatic flexure, and transverse colon. b)Includes splenic flexure, descending, sigmoid, and rectosigmoid colon.

Table 3.

Tumor locations and annual number of surgeries for colorectal cancer from 2019 to 2023 in Korea

Location Disease code Year Total
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Colon, any site C18 0 0 1 0 0 1
Cecum C18.0 708 803 858 901 898 4,168
Appendix C18.1 231 216 259 272 289 1,267
Ascending colon C18.2 3,219 3,067 3,389 3,242 2,988 15,905
Hepatic flexure C18.3 684 660 695 711 735 3,485
Transverse colon C18.4 1,078 1,036 1,184 1,103 1,098 5,499
Splenic flexure C18.5 192 168 185 192 200 937
Descending colon C18.6 764 821 791 771 732 3,879
Sigmoid colon C18.7 5,526 5,305 5,948 5,684 5,328 27,791
Colon, overlapping lesion C18.8 111 60 59 62 60 352
Colon, unspecified C18.9 1,029 909 977 962 957 4,834
Rectosigmoid colon C19 2,146 2,160 2,101 2,120 2,022 10,549
Rectum C20 6,129 5,829 6,461 6,350 6,147 30,916
Total 21,807 21,034 22,908 22,370 21,454 109,573

Table 4.

Surgery for colorectal cancer by age and sex in Korea from 2019 to 2023

Age (yr) Male Female Total
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
10–19 5 5 5 4 3 22 0 2 1 4 2 9 31
20–29 49 44 63 47 69 272 35 30 30 33 46 174 446
30–39 208 238 204 236 214 1,100 196 184 196 183 173 932 2,032
40–49 838 809 877 796 699 4,019 816 770 799 751 702 3,838 7,857
50–59 2,878 2,766 2,749 2,614 2,576 13,583 1,714 1,683 1,765 1,701 1,707 8,570 22,153
60–69 4,140 4,033 4,581 4,502 4,485 21,741 2,107 2,067 2,263 2,218 2,120 10,775 32,516
70–79 3,395 3,216 3,453 3,450 3,122 16,636 2,464 2,214 2,413 2,304 2,092 11,487 28,123
80–89 1,331 1,307 1,511 1,557 1,494 7,200 1457 1,458 1,751 1,747 1,700 8,113 15,313
≥90 66 73 77 71 94 381 108 135 170 152 156 721 1,102
Total 12,910 12,491 13,520 13,277 12,756 64,954 8,897 8,543 9,388 9,093 8,698 44,619 109,573

The length of hospital stay after CRC surgery is shown (Table 5). The mean length of hospital stay after surgery over the 5-year period was 12.8 ± 7.8 days. Stratified by surgical approach, the mean lengths of hospital stay after open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery during the study period were 15.4, 12.4, and 11.3 days, respectively. Open surgery resulted in a significantly longer hospital stay than the other two surgical approaches (vs. laparoscopy, p < 0.0001; vs. robotic surgery, p < 0.0001), and robotic surgery resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay than laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.0001). These differences were maintained in year-by-year comparisons. Over the 5-year period, the length of stay after laparoscopic surgery remained stable, whereas the lengths of stay after open and robotic surgery tended to gradually decrease.

Table 5.

The length of hospital stay after CRC surgery from 2019 to 2023 in Korea

Year Length of hospital stay after surgery (day) p-value
Open Lap Robot Total Open vs. Lap Open vs. Robot Lap vs. Robot
2019 16.8 ± 10.2 12.6 ± 6.7 12.1 ± 7.9 13.3 ± 7.8 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0047
2020 15.8 ± 10.6 12.4 ± 6.5 12.0 ± 8.2 13.0 ± 7.8 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0227
2021 15.2 ± 11.5 12.4 ± 6.5 11.5 ± 7.8 12.8 ± 7.8 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
2022 14.0 ± 11.3 12.2 ± 6.5 10.8 ± 6.9 12.3 ± 7.6 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
2023 15.0 ± 12.3 12.3 ± 6.8 10.6 ± 6.4 12.5 ± 8.0 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Total 15.4 ± 11.2 12.4 ± 6.6 11.3 ± 7.4 12.8 ± 7.8 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Open, open surgery; Lap, laparoscopic surgery; Robot, robotic surgery.

Surgical approaches according to the Korean healthcare system type are shown (Table 6). In total, 101,476 CRC surgeries (92.6%) were covered by the NHI. The rates of laparoscopic surgery among patients with NHI ranged from 71.1% to 72.1% over 5 years. The open surgery rate decreased, whereas the robotic surgery rate increased. The proportions of patients with MAP and veterans’ benefits were small (7.2% and 0.2%, respectively), making direct comparison difficult. However, the rates of surgeries among patients with MAP remained stable during the study period. Overall, among patients with NHI, the open surgery rate tended to be lower and the robotic surgery rate tended to be higher, compared with the other groups. The laparoscopic surgery rate remained similar regardless of medical insurance type. The lengths of hospital stay after surgery, stratified by medical insurance type are shown (Table 7). Among patients with NHI, the mean lengths of hospital stay were 15.1 days, 12.2 days, and 11.2 days for open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery, respectively. These were significantly shorter than the lengths of stay among patients with MAP for all surgical approaches (p < 0.0001).

Table 6.

Surgical approach for colorectal cancer by type of healthcare system in Korea from 2019 to 2023

Type of insurance Type of surgery Year Total
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
National Health Insurance Open 3,633 (17.9) 3,607 (18.5) 3,519 (16.6) 3,354 (16.2) 2,916 (14.7) 17,029 (16.8)
Laparoscopic 14,470 (71.5) 13,838 (71.1) 15,239 (71.8) 14,822 (71.5) 14,281 (72.1) 72,650 (71.6)
Robotic 2,140 (10.6) 2,029 (10.4) 2,477 (11.7) 2,541 (12.3) 2,610 (13.2) 11,797 (11.6)
Total 20,243 19,474 21,235 20,717 19,807 101,476
Medical Aid Program Open 344 (22.8) 359 (24.0) 368 (22.6) 353 (21.9) 353 (21.6) 1,777 (22.6)
Laparoscopic 1,058 (70.2) 1,021 (68.3) 1,154 (70.9) 1,147 (71.3) 1,168 (71.4) 5,548 (70.5)
Robotic 105 (7.0) 115 (7.7) 105 (6.5) 109 (6.8) 115 (7.0) 549 (7.0)
Total 1,507 1,495 1,627 1,609 1,636 7,874
Veterans’ benefits Open 14 (24.6) 18 (27.7) 9 (19.6) 8 (18.2) 2 (18.2) 51 (22.9)
Laparoscopic 41 (71.9) 42 (64.6) 29 (63.0) 34 (77.3) 5 (45.5) 151 (67.7)
Robotic 2 (3.5) 5 (7.7) 8 (17.4) 2 (4.5) 4 (36.4) 21 (9.4)
Total 57 65 46 44 11 223
Total 21,807 21,034 22,908 22,370 21,454 109,573

Values are presented as number only or number (%).

Table 7.

The length of hospital stay (day) after CRC surgery by type of healthcare system in Korea from 2019 to 2023

Type of surgery Type of insurance Year p-valuea)
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total NHI vs. MAP NHI vs. veterans MAP vs. veterans
Open NHI 16.5 ± 9.9 15.5 ± 10.5 14.9 ± 11.4 13.8 ± 11.2 14.7 ± 12.1 15.1 ± 11.0 <0.0001 >0.9999 0.8566
MAP 19.9 ± 12.4 18.7 ± 11.6 17.5 ± 11.9 16.0 ± 12.2 17.2 ± 13.7 17.9 ± 12.4
Veterans 11.7 ± 8.0 16.4 ± 6.7 17.4 ± 8.5 19.8 ± 5.7 24.5 ± 7.8 16.2 ± 7.7
Total 16.8 ± 10.2 15.8 ± 10.6 15.2 ± 11.5 14.0 ± 11.3 15.0 ± 12.3 15.3 ± 11.2
Laparoscopic NHI 12.4 ± 6.5 12.3 ± 6.4 12.2 ± 6.3 12.0 ± 6.3 12.1 ± 6.7 12.2 ± 6.4 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.8542
MAP 15.5 ± 8.6 14.9 ± 8.0 14.9 ± 9.2 14.5 ± 8.9 14.5 ± 7.5 14.8 ± 8.5
Veterans 15.2 ± 6.7 14.4 ± 5.1 15.3 ± 6.7 16.8 ± 6.7 16.8 ± 7.4 15.4 ± 6.3
Total 12.6 ± 6.7 12.4 ± 6.5 12.4 ± 6.5 12.2 ± 6.5 12.3 ± 6.8 12.4 ± 6.6
Robotic NHI 11.9 ± 7.8 11.7 ± 7.5 11.3 ± 7.4 10.7 ± 6.8 10.5 ± 6.3 11.2 ± 7.1 <0.0001 0.0353 >0.9999
MAP 14.8 ± 10.0 16.2 ± 16.5 15.6 ± 12.6 13.8 ± 8.3 13.3 ± 9.2 14.7 ± 11.8
Veterans 16.0 ± 2.8 13.4 ± 6.2 17.4 ± 5.4 16.5 ± 6.4 12.3 ± 3.8 15.2 ± 5.2
Total 12.1 ± 7.9 12.0 ± 8.2 11.5 ± 7.8 10.8 ± 6.9 10.6 ± 6.4 11.3 ± 7.4

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

NHI, National Health Insurance; MAP, Medical Aid Program; Veterans, Veterans’ benefits.

a)Obtained by comparing the mean lengths of stay in the total column.

The numbers of surgeries for CRC according to hospital size are shown (Table 8). Overall, 74,282 CRC surgeries (67.8%) were performed in tertiary general hospitals, and 33,050 (30.2%) were performed in general hospitals. The number of CRC surgeries performed in hospitals (with 30 to 100 beds) gradually decreased over the 5-year period. In tertiary general hospitals, the number and proportion of open surgeries gradually decreased, whereas in general hospitals, the proportion of open surgeries tended to increase. Laparoscopic and robotic surgeries were performed at similar rates in tertiary and general hospitals during the study period. The numbers of CRC surgeries by hospital region are shown (Table 9). Of the total surgeries, 47,140 (43.0%) were performed in Seoul, 19,961 (18.2%) in Gyeonggi, 7,417 (6.8%) in Daegu, and 7,190 (6.6%) in Busan.

Table 8.

Surgery for colorectal cancer by hospital size in Korea from 2019 to 2023

Type of surgery Hospital size Year Total
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total Total 21,807 21,034 22,908 22,370 21,454 109,573
Tertiary GH 14,890 (68.3) 14,087 (67.0) 15,675 (68.4) 15,040 (67.2) 14,590 (68.0) 74,282 (67.8)
GH 6,357 (29.2) 6,491 (30.9) 6,792 (29.6) 6,909 (30.9) 6,501 (30.3) 33,050 (30.2)
Hospitala) 555 (2.5) 446 (2.1) 440 (1.9) 421 (1.9) 355 (1.7) 2,217 (2.0)
Clinicb) 5 (0.0) 10 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 0 (0) 8 (0.0) 24 (0.0)
Open Total 3,991 3,984 3,896 3,715 3,271 18,857
Tertiary GH 2,496 (62.5) 2,407 (60.4) 2,247 (57.7) 1,985 (53.4) 1,765 (54.0) 10,900 (57.8)
GH 1,466 (36.7) 1,532 (38.5) 1,635 (42.0) 1,706 (45.9) 1,491 (45.6) 7,830 (41.5)
Hospital 27 (0.7) 39 (1.0) 14 (0.4) 24 (0.6) 14 (0.4) 118 (0.6)
Clinic 2 (0.1) 6 (0.2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.0) 9 (0.0)
Laparoscopic Total 15,569 14,901 16,422 16,003 15,454 78,349
Tertiary GH 10,551 (67.8) 9,961 (66.8) 11,228 (68.4) 10,882 (68.0) 10,575 (68.4) 53,197 (67.9)
GH 4,499 (28.9) 4,544 (30.5) 4,773 (29.1) 4,736 (29.6) 4,539 (29.4) 23,091 (29.5)
Hospital 518 (3.3) 392 (2.6) 420 (2.6) 385 (2.4) 334 (2.2) 2,049 (2.6)
Clinic 1 (0.0) 4 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 0 (0) 6 (0.0) 12 (0.0)
Robotic Total 2,247 2,149 2,590 2,652 2,729 12,367
Tertiary GH 1,843 (82.0) 1,719 (80.0) 2,200 (84.9) 2,173 (81.9) 2,250 (82.4) 10,185 (82.4)
GH 392 (17.4) 415 (19.3) 384 (14.8) 467 (17.6) 471 (17.3) 2,129 (17.2)
Hospital 10 (0.4) 15 (0.7) 6 (0.2) 12 (0.5) 7 (0.3) 50 (0.4)
Clinic 2 (0.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.0) 3 (0.0)

Values are presented as number only or number (%).

GH, general hospital.

a)30 to 100 beds, b)less than 30 beds.

Table 9.

Surgery for colorectal cancer by the region in Korea from 2019 to 2023

Region Year Total
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Seoul 9,879 9,031 9,796 9,390 9,044 47,140 (43.0)
Busan 1,482 1,442 1,514 1,424 1,328 7,190 (6.6)
Incheon 977 987 1,031 900 956 4,851 (4.4)
Daegu 1,467 1,398 1,541 1,545 1,466 7,417 (6.8)
Gwangju 184 188 194 224 199 989 (0.9)
Daejeon 657 694 693 709 683 3,436 (3.1)
Ulsan 242 216 260 242 279 1,239 (1.1)
Gyeonggi 3,648 3,694 4,285 4,276 4,058 19,961 (18.2)
Gangwon 483 556 566 540 469 2,614 (2.4)
Chungcheongbuk-do 217 236 237 251 245 1,186 (1.1)
Chungcheongnam-do 298 313 339 357 376 1,683 (1.5)
Jeonbuk 511 521 556 550 547 2,685 (2.5)
Jeollanam-do 715 680 734 772 744 3,645 (3.3)
Gyeongsangbuk-do 119 114 128 126 116 603 (0.6)
Gyeongsangnam-do 791 792 847 867 761 4,058 (3.7)
Jeju 136 165 159 165 149 774 (0.7)
Sejong 1 7 28 32 34 102 (0.1)
Total 21,807 21,034 22,908 22,370 21,454 109,573

Values are presented as number only or number (%).

The inclusion or exclusion of ostomy surgery during the main surgical resection for CRC was examined (Table 10). The timing of ostomy surgery in the data search was classified as before the main surgery, at the same time as the main surgery, within 30 days after the main surgery, and 30 days after the main surgery. Overall, ostomy was created in 16,222 of all CRC surgeries (14.8%). The proportions of ostomy surgeries in open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery were 3,436 (18.2%), 10,818 (13.8%), and 1,968 (15.9%), respectively. Over the 5-year period, an increasing trend was observed in the number of ostomy surgeries performed before the main surgery, whereas the number performed after 30 days after the main surgery continued to decrease. The number and rate of ostomy surgery are shown by tumor location (Table 11). The overall rate of ostomy surgery for rectal tumors was 36.7% over the 5-year period.

Table 10.

Ostomy surgery for colorectal cancer resection in Korea from 2019 to 2023

Type of surgery Category Total Year
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total No. of surgery 109,573 21,807 21,034 22,908 22,370 21,454
Ostomy, total 16,222 (14.8) 3,173 (14.6) 3,181 (15.1) 3,434 (15.0) 3,320 (14.8) 3,114 (14.5)
Before 2,136 168 349 431 599 589
Simultaneously 12,911 2,674 2520 2748 2,543 2426
Within 30 days 252 46 55 44 51 56
After 30 days 923 285 257 211 127 43
Open No. of surgery 18,857 3,991 3,984 3,896 3,715 3,271
Ostomy, total 3,436 (18.2) 707 (17.7) 696 (17.5) 720 (18.5) 685 (18.4) 628 (19.2)
Before 917 72 146 176 252 271
Simultaneously 2,283 552 489 493 405 344
Within 30 days 29 8 8 2 4 7
After 30 days 207 75 53 49 24 6
Laparoscopic No. of surgery 78,349 15,569 14,901 16,422 16,003 15,454
Ostomy, total 10,818 (13.8) 2,145 (13.8) 2,063 (13.8) 2,276 (13.9) 2,203 (13.8) 2,131 (13.8)
Before 693 67 107 137 203 179
Simultaneously 9,544 1,932 1,808 2,000 1,905 1,899
Within 30 days 151 21 33 32 31 34
After 30 days 430 125 115 107 64 19
Robotic No. of surgery 12,367 2,247 2,149 2,590 2,652 2,729
Ostomy, total 1,968 (15.9) 321 (14.3) 422 (19.6) 438 (16.9) 432 (16.3) 355 (13.0)
Before 526 29 96 118 144 139
Simultaneously 1,084 190 223 255 233 183
Within 30 days 72 17 14 10 16 15
After 30 days 286 85 89 55 39 18

Values are presented as number only or number (%).

Table 11.

Ostomy surgery for colorectal cancer resection by tumor location in Korea from 2019 to 2023

Location Category Total Year
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Colon, any site No. of surgery 1 0 0 1 0 0
Ostomy 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cecum No. of surgery 4,168 708 803 858 901 898
Ostomy 132 (3.2) 28 (4.0) 33 (4.1) 30 (3.5) 23 (2.6) 18 (2.0)
Appendix No. of surgery 1,267 231 216 259 272 289
Ostomy 51 (4.0) 5 (2.2) 13 (6.0) 15 (5.8) 9 (3.3) 9 (3.1)
Ascending colon No. of surgery 15,905 3,219 3,067 3,389 3242 2,988
Ostomy 460 (2.9) 95 (3.0) 102 (3.3) 99 (2.9) 95 (2.9) 69 (2.3)
Hepatic flexure No. of surgery 3,485 684 660 695 711 735
Ostomy 110 (3.2) 21 (3.1) 20 (3.0) 21 (3.0) 20 (2.8) 28 (3.8)
Transverse colon No. of surgery 5,499 1,078 1,036 1,184 1,103 1,098
Ostomy 232 (4.2) 46 (4.3) 55 (5.3) 35 (3.0) 48 (4.4) 48 (4.4)
Splenic flexure No. of surgery 937 192 168 185 192 200
Ostomy 77 (8.2) 14 (7.3) 13 (7.7) 21 (11.4) 19 (9.9) 10 (5.0)
Descending colon No. of surgery 3,879 764 821 791 771 732
Ostomy 279 (7.2) 62 (8.1) 64 (7.8) 60 (7.6) 49 (6.4) 44 (6.0)
Sigmoid colon No. of surgery 27,791 5,526 5,305 5,948 5,684 5,328
Ostomy 1,773 (6.4) 363 (6.6) 328 (6.2) 383 (6.4) 382 (6.7) 317 (5.9)
Colon, overlapping No. of surgery 342 101 60 59 62 60
Ostomy 38 (11.1) 13 (12.9) 8 (13.3) 7 (11.9) 6 (9.7) 4 (6.7)
Colon, unspecified No. of surgery 4,834 1,029 909 977 962 957
Ostomy 437 (9.0) 99 (9.6) 77 (8.5) 101 (10.3) 85 (8.8) 75 (7.8)
Rectosigmoid colon No. of surgery 10,549 2,146 2160 2,101 2,120 2,022
Ostomy 1,277 (12.1) 265 (12.3) 249 (11.5) 279 (13.3) 254 (12.0) 230 (11.4)
Rectum No. of surgery 30,916 6,129 5,829 6,461 6,350 6,147
Ostomy 11,356 (36.7) 2,162 (35.3) 2,219 (38.1) 2,383 (36.9) 2,330 (36.7) 2,262 (36.8)

Values are presented as number only or number (%).

DISCUSSION

This study investigated nationwide data regarding surgery for CRC from 2019 to 2023, using the approach described in previous studies [5,6]. In those studies, only a limited set of predetermined data was provided by HIRA. However, in the present study, a considerably larger dataset was accessed via direct retrieval from the HIRA database. Newly included in this study were differences in surgical volume according to region and hospital size, variations in surgical approach by medical insurance type, and comparisons of hospital stay length by surgical method. Notably, nationwide data regarding robotic surgery for CRC, which is not covered by health insurance in Korea, were included. The data search conditions described above are expected to provide the most accurate estimate of the actual number of robotic surgeries performed in Korea.

From 2019 to 2023, the rate of laparoscopic surgery stabilized, whereas robotic surgery increased from 10.3% to 12.7%, and the rate of open surgery gradually declined. The rate of open surgery was highest at 18.9% in 2020 and then decreased to 15.2% in 2023, and such a trend was also observed in both the left and right colons. In contrast, a temporary decline in the number of laparoscopic and robotic surgeries was observed in 2020, which may be associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. For example, Choi et al. [9] reported that the rate of MIS for CRC decreased and combined resection increased in 2020, the first year of the pandemic. They noted that patients were reluctant to undergo surgery due to the pandemic, leading to surgeries for more advanced and complex cancers [9]. It should be addressed whether this trend was unique to Korea or consistent with global patterns during the pandemic. The rate of MIS for CRC reached nearly 85% in 2023. The average rates of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in the right colon, left colon, and rectum were 74.6% and 4.3%, 76.0% and 6.7%, and 62.6% and 25.2%, respectively. The adoption of robotic surgery for rectal cancer exceeded 28% in 2023 and has been gradually increasing throughout the colon.

Differences in surgical approach and length of hospital stay were observed according to medical insurance status. The higher rate of open surgery among patients with medical aid may be related to the presence of more advanced cancer and possible economic factors. Because the length of hospital stay after CRC surgery was significantly longer across all surgical approaches among patients with medical aid, these patients may have had more advanced cancer or undergone more aggressive surgery, resulting in a prolonged recovery period. On the other hand, the relative lack of post-discharge care among patients with medical aid may contribute to these differences. However, because tumor stage, oncological outcomes, and complications are not included in the HIRA data, the exact cause remains unknown. If future studies supplement this analysis with data regarding the age distribution, the proportion of metastatic disease, and the ratio of postoperative chemotherapy among patients with medical aid, a more precise explanation may be inferred.

To our knowledge, this study is the first to collect nationwide Korean data regarding the number of CRC surgeries according to hospital size and region. Overall, 67.8% of CRC surgeries were performed in tertiary general hospitals, whereas 30.2% were performed in general hospitals. Although the proportion of CRC surgeries performed in hospitals with 30 to 100 beds was quite small, the average rate of laparoscopic surgery in these hospitals was 92.4% (2,049 of 2,217 cases), indicating that MIS for CRC is widely adopted even in smaller hospitals. For open surgery, the number and rate continued to decrease in tertiary general hospitals but increased in general hospitals over the 5-year period. The rates of robotic surgery were 13.7% (10,185 of 74,282 cases) in tertiary general hospitals and 6.9% (2,129 of 33,050 cases) in general hospitals; the rates of open surgery were 14.7% (10,900 of 74,282 cases) and 23.7% (7,830 of 33,050 cases), respectively. Compared with general hospitals, tertiary general hospitals had a similar rate of laparoscopic surgery, twice the number of robotic surgeries, and a lower rate of open surgery. Overall, 65.7% of CRC surgeries in Korea were performed in the metropolitan area (Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon), 18.5% were performed in the five metropolitan cities (Busan, Daegu, Gwangju, Daejeon, and Ulsan), and 15.8% were performed in nine local regions including special cities and provinces. This concentration of surgeries in the metropolitan area should be addressed through government policy.

Lastly, there is a possibility that some ostomy surgeries during robotic surgery were not included in the HIRA data. In other words, since the cost of robotic surgery is not covered by Korean health insurance, there is a possibility that no additional cost for ostomy surgery was charged during robotic surgery in some cases.

In conclusion, our analysis of HIRA nationwide data confirmed that the rate of MIS for CRC in Korea has continued to increase, reaching 84.7% in 2023. The rate of laparoscopic surgery exceeded 70%, has plateaued, and remained similar between tertiary general hospitals and general hospitals. In contrast, the rate of robotic surgery has continued to increase, particularly in rectal cancer, where it exceeded 28% in 2023.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Su Jin Jeong from Statistics Support Team of Kyung Hee University Hospital for assistance with data retrieval and statistical analysis.

Notes

Ethics statement

This study was reviewed and granted an exemption by the Institutional Review Board of Kyung Hee University Hospital (No. KHUH 2024-10-029).

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: SJP

Formal Analysis: EJP, SJP

Supervision: KYL, SHL

Writing–original draft: EJP, SJP

Writing–review & editing: HGL, YYP, KYL, SHL

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Sun Jin Park, the Editor-in-Chief and Youn Young Park, the Deputy Editor of Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery did not participate in the review process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Funding/support

None.

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  • 1.Park EH, Jung KW, Park NJ, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2021. Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56:357–371. doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–1332. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Park JW, Kang SB, Hao J, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): 10-year follow-up of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6:569–577. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00094-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.An L, Hwang KS, Park SH, et al. Trends of robotic-assisted surgery for thyroid, colorectal, stomach and hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer: 10 year Korea trend investigation. Asian J Surg. 2021;44:199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park SJ, Lee KY, Lee SH. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Korea: nationwide data from 2008~2013. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2015;18:39–43. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2015.18.2.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Park SJ, Lee KY, Lee SH. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Korea: nationwide data from 2013 to 2018. Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52:938–944. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1569–1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Park JS, Lee SM, Choi GS, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancers: the COLRAR Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2023;278:31–38. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Choi JY, Park IJ, Lee HG, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical treatment patterns for colorectal cancer in a tertiary medical facility in Korea. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:2221. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery

RESOURCES