ABSTRACT
As clinical Salmonella enterica serovar Thompson (S. Thompson) emerged among the top ten prevalent serovars in China, understanding the distribution and origin of its multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains becomes imperative. This study employed antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis to investigate the prevalence and genomic profiles of clinically important S. Thompson ST26 across China from 1997 to 2020. Upon analyzing 141 isolates from various sources, we identified 29 isolates, derived from 25 diarrhea patients and four animal-derived foods, displayed co-resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and azithromycin (CIPRCTXRAZIR), all of which are considered the front-line and critically-important antimicrobial agents for treating Salmonella infections in humans. The IncC plasmid was the predominant mobile vector identified among the CIPRCTXRAZIR isolates, harboring four crucial resistance genes qnrS1, qepA4, blaCMY-2, and mph(A) that confer resistance to three critically important antimicrobials. However, the closely related and clustered IncC-harboring CIPRCTXRAZIR isolates (0–23 single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) indicated the clonal spreading of these clinically important isolates in different provinces of China. Notably, the CIPRCTXRAZIR isolates appeared in aquatic products of animal-derived food, highlighting the possibility of aquaculture practices in the emergence and transmission of important antimicrobial resistance. Our findings emphasize the critical public health implications of IncC-carrying clinically important S. Thompson ST26. The study calls for enhanced surveillance of the clinically important S. Thompson ST26 clone in clinical and aquaculture and implementation of targeted interventions to mitigate its spread, thereby protecting food safety and public health.
IMPORTANCE
We highlighted the critical veterinary public health issue of clinically important Salmonella enterica serovar Thompson (S. Thompson) prevalence in animal-derived foods, particularly aquatic products, calling for urgent action. The ability of S. Thompson to resist critically important antimicrobials across diverse environments highlights the transmission and survival of resistant strains within the livestock and poultry industry, aquaculture, and food production chains. This study underscores the importance of continuous surveillance of clinically important S. Thompson, especially in aquaculture settings, and considers the global trade of aquatic products as a potential vector for international dissemination. Further investigation on the factors contributing to the clone spread of clinically important Salmonella strain and the development of intervention strategies to mitigate its public health impact.
KEYWORDS: Salmonella enterica serovar Thompson, diarrheal patients, multidrug-resistant, IncC, aquatic product
INTRODUCTION
With an annual estimate of 93.8 million infections and approximately 155,000 deaths worldwide, non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) represents a significant threat to global public health as a leading cause of foodborne illness (1, 2). Among the documented over 2,600 serovars of NTS, Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium are the most frequently reported (3, 4). However, the clinical S. enterica serovar Thompson (S. Thompson) has recently emerged as a growing concern, now ranking among the top ten prevalent serovars reported in both China and the United States of America (USA) (5, 6). S. Thompson has been implicated in various international foodborne outbreaks linked to a diverse range of foods, including seafood, roast beef, and fresh cilantro in the USA (7–9), rucola lettuce in Norway (10), smoked salmon in the Netherlands (11), and chocolate cake in South Korea (12).
Similar to other NTS serovars, infections with S. Thompson commonly result in gastroenteritis (11), which is usually self-limiting. However, vulnerable groups such as the elderly, immunocompromised individuals, and children are at risk of developing severe complications like bacteremia and meningitis (2, 13, 14). These cases often require antimicrobial agents to prevent disease escalation and fatalities (14). Currently, the treatments for Salmonella infections include three classes of front-line antimicrobial agents: fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin), third-generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefotaxime and ceftriaxone), and macrolides (e.g., azithromycin) (5, 15), though their efficacy is being undermined by increasing resistance rates. Notably, resistance rates of NTS to these antimicrobial agents in China (16.2%, 19.3%, and 7.9%) are higher compared to those in the European Union (EU) (14.1%, 0.8%, and <1.0%) and USA (8.0%, 3.0%, and 1.0%) (5, 15, 16). Furthermore, sporadic reports of concurrent resistance to the three classes of antimicrobial agents in certain serovars, such as in S. enterica serovar Kentucky (17), Indiana (18), and Typhimurium (19) have also been reported. In most cases, the genes responsible for conferring bacterial resistance to these antimicrobial agents are independently located either on the chromosome—via mutations in gyrA and/or parC or on transferable plasmids {plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance [PMQR] genes [qnr genes, aac(6')-lb-cr, qepA, and oqxAB] and extended-spectrum β-lactamases [such as CTX-M] or macrolide resistance gene mph(A)} (20–22). In China, the resistance rates recorded to these antimicrobial agents for clinical S. Thompson have exceeded 25%, according to an 8-year study (5). Notably, clinical S. Thompson from sporadic cases in some Chinese regions exhibited co-resistance to three front-line antimicrobial agents; however, the extent of the spread of these clinically important S. Thompson within China remains to be determined, and the plasmid features and transmission mechanisms of these strains are not fully elucidated (23, 24).
Herein, we report that the co-resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and azithromycin (CIPRCTXRAZIR) in S. Thompson is largely due to a single IncC plasmid harboring resistance genes qnrS1, qepA4, blaCMY-2, and mph(A). Furthermore, clinical S. Thompson with this plasmid exhibits a close genetic relationship to those from aquatic sources. This underscores the need for vigilant surveillance of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson in both aquatic products and human populations via a One Health perspective. Additionally, further genomic epidemiology studies are essential to fully understand the spread and public health impact of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial isolates
In our routine surveillance of NTS, a collection of 141 isolates confirmed as S. Thompson from multiple Chinese provinces was assembled (Table S1). The highest number of isolates was collected from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (n = 40), followed by Guangdong (n = 19), Sichuan (n = 16), and Hubei (n = 15). Isolates from the remaining regions were fewer than 10 (refer to Table S2 for further details). Of these, 57 clinical isolates were sourced from patients with diarrhea, provided by several regional Centers for Disease Control laboratories in China, facilitated by the State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control. These samples originated from nine provinces and were collected between 1997 and 2020. Additionally, 84 isolates were obtained from foods of animal origin. These samples were collected by the National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, spanning 11 provinces and one municipality from 2008 to 2019 (Fig. S1). Clinical fecal samples first underwent enrichment in selenite brilliant green sulfa enrichment broth for 18 h at 36°C ± 1°C, while infection site samples (e.g., blood or cerebrospinal fluid) were cultivated directly on blood agar plates for the same duration and temperature. Isolation and purification of clinical isolates were conducted as per previous methodologies (23). S. Thompson from food samples were isolated employing a modified method based on the United States Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (25). The isolates with typical Salmonella phenotypes were all identified on the VITEK 2 COMPACT automated microbial identification platform (bioMérieux, Beijing, China) along with following the Kauffmann-White scheme at the National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment in Beijing, China (26).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
We performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) on all S. Thompson isolates using a panel of 14 antimicrobial agents (Table S3), following the standardized broth microdilution method in accordance with the guidelines outlined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard (M100-ED30) (27). The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of most antimicrobial agents, excluding azithromycin, were interpreted based on the CLSI standard (M100-ED30) (27). For azithromycin, the breakpoint was determined according to the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System guideline for Salmonella (28). The Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 (for azithromycin) were included as quality control. Multi-drug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents.
Genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis
Genomic DNA from all S. Thompson was extracted using a HiPure Bacterial DNA Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China), following the standard protocol. The purified DNA was dispatched to Novogene (Beijing, China) for commercial library construction and was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform, generating read lengths of 150 bp with the paired-end chemistry. One hundred forty-one raw reads were de novo assembled using Skesa (v2.4.0) (29). Core genome analysis for all of the 141 nationwide non-repetitive S. Thompson genomes was performed using Roary (v 3.13.0) (30), followed by Snippy (v 4.6.0) and Gubbins (v 3.3.0) (31, 32). After that, the phylogenetic tree was generated with Fasttree (v2.1.11) (33), and visualized with Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4 (https://itol.embl.de/). Further bioinformatics analyses involved tools like ResFinder (v4.2.5) (34), PlasmidFinder (v2.0.1) (35), SeqSero (v1.3.1) (36), and MLST (v2.0) (37, 38) were computed using the CGE website with default parameters to identify the antimicrobial resistance (AMR)-encoding genes (including chromosomal point mutations and acquired AMR genes), plasmid replicons, serovars, and sequence types, respectively. Local BLAST searches of Salmonella Genomic Island 1 (SGI1) were conducted using BLASTN 2.13.0 (39) with an E-value threshold of 1e-10, employing a reference sequence (accession: AF261825.2) from the NCBI database. Virulence genes were detected by using Abricate (v1.0.1, Github https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) with the database VFDB (Downloaded: July 2023) (40). Additionally, 1,484 publicly available S. Thompson genomes were downloaded from the NCBI database (data were accessed in June 2023, Table S4) for extensive comparative phylogenetic analysis, and these primarily originated from North America (n = 1,160) and Europe (n = 226), with the remainder representing various global regions including China (n = 58), South America (n = 24), other Asian countries (n = 5), and some with unspecified origins (n = 11).
Plasmid conjugation experiments
Plasmid conjugation experiments were conducted using the filter mating method, with sodium azide-resistant E. coli J53 as the recipient strain. A mixture of donor strains and the recipient strain J53 (ratio of 1:3) was incubated on LB agar plates for 6 h at 37°C. The successful transconjugants were selected on LB agar plates supplemented with 150 µg/mL sodium azide and 4 µg/mL azithromycin for overnight incubation. Confirmation of transconjugants was achieved through PCR and AST.
Long-read sequencing and plasmid analysis
For comprehensive genomic characterization, complete genomes of eight representative S. Thompson, expressing co-resistance to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin, were sequenced using the Nanopore MinION platform (Oxford, UK). Complete genomes were assembled in a hybrid assembly method with both Illumina and Oxford Nanopore data using Unicycler (v4.0.1) (41). The complete plasmid sequences were extracted using a contig-puller with a 90% minimum identity (https://github.com/kwongj/contig-puller). Gene prediction across the entire genomes and plasmids was annotated using the RAST service (42) and Prokka (v1.14.5) software (43). The AMR determinants, and plasmid replicons located on plasmids were re-identified using the ResFinder (v4.2.5) and PlasmidFinder (v2.0.1), respectively. The putative mobile elements and conjugation-related genes were identified using ISfinder (https://www-is.biotoul.fr/) and oriTfinder (https://tool-mml.sjtu.edu.cn/oriTfinder/oriTfinder.html) with default parameters, respectively. Visualization of single plasmid circular maps was achieved with DNAplotter (v18.0.0) software (44). The alignment of linear plasmids was visualized by Easyfig v2.2.2 (45), and the alignment of circular plasmids with other genomes was produced by BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) v0.95.22 (46).
Plasmid stability testing
The assessment of plasmid stability commenced with inoculating strains on selective media, ensuring plasmid presence. Post-verification, three individual clones from each strain were cultured in Luria Bertani (LB) medium and incubated overnight at 37°C for growth. Cultures were then diluted (1:1,000 ratio) into 2 mL of fresh LB broth and incubated with shaking at 37°C. Every 3 days, a set of 64 single clones from each strain were selected and cultured on LB agar plates under both selective and non-selective conditions, executed in triplicate. Plasmid stability was quantified based on these experimental results, employing a methodology outlined previously (47).
Statistical analysis
Correlation analysis of pairwise plasmid and between pairwise plasmid and AMR-encoding genes (ARGs) were calculated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. To assess the statistical significance of each correlation, P values were calculated, and significance levels were marked as *** for P < 0.001, ** for P < 0.01, and * for P < 0.05. The heatmap was generated using the ggplot2 package in R (v 4.1.3), with color gradients indicating the strength and direction of each correlation.
RESULTS
S. Thompson exhibited widespread distribution and varied AMR profiles
Our study comprised some 141 S. Thompson collected over an extended time period: 57 from clinical samples cultured from diarrheal patients (1997–2020), 84 from animal-derived foods (aquatic products n = 25, chicken meat n = 49, and other meat n = 10, 2008–2019). Using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data, all isolates were identified by in silico MLST and serotyping as S. Thompson ST26. Antimicrobial susceptibility analysis exhibited varying resistance rates: 72.3% (102/141) to tetracycline, 67.4% (95/141) to ampicillin, 65.2% (92/141) to chloramphenicol, 60.3% (85/141) to ampicillin/sulbactam, 65.2% (92/141) to cefazolin, and 64.5% (91/141) to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Notably, resistance to colistin was rare at 0.7% (1/141), and no resistance to imipenem was detected (Fig. 1a). An MDR profile was observed in 100 (70.9%) of the study isolates. Chicken meat-derived isolates demonstrated higher resistance rates (ampicillin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefazolin, cefotaxime, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), ranging from 71.4% (ampicillin/sulbactam, 35/49) to 85.7% (ampicillin, 42/49), compared to aquatic product-derived isolates, which ranged from 20.0% (chloramphenicol, 5/25) to 52.0% (ampicillin, 13/25) (Fig. 1b).
Fig 1.
Antimicrobial resistance profile of 141 S. Thompson isolates. (a) Antimicrobial susceptibility of 141 S. Thompson to 14 antimicrobial agents. (b) Percentage of resistance observed in S. Thompson isolates cultured from different sources. (c) Comparative analysis of resistance rates between CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson and other isolates. R, resistant; I, intermediary; S, susceptible; TET, tetracycline; AMP, ampicillin; CFZ, cefazolin; CHL, chloramphenicol; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; CTX, cefotaxime; AMS, ampicillin/sulbactam; FOX, cefoxitin; CAZ, ceftazidime; AZI, azithromycin; GEN, gentamycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CST, colistin; IPM, imipenem.
One hundred six (75.2%) isolates expressed resistance to at least one of the three front-line antimicrobials. Specifically, resistance was observed in 89 (63.1%) isolates to cefotaxime, 43 (30.5%) to azithromycin, and 35 (24.8%) to ciprofloxacin. Co-resistance to these antimicrobial agents, defining the CIPRCTXRAZIR, was found in 29 (20.6%) S. Thompson isolates, which showed significantly higher resistance rates to most tested compounds, except for gentamicin, colistin, and imipenem, compared to the other 112 (79.4%) S. Thompson isolates (Fig. 1c). The CIPRCTXRAZIR expressing isolates originated from diverse sources: 25 from diarrhea patients, four from aquatic products, and were distributed across various regions in China (Fig. 2a), including Eastern (Fujian and Jiangxi), South (Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Guangdong), Central (Hunan and Hubei), and Southwest (Sichuan) from 2010 to 2020 (Fig. 2b).
Fig 2.
Comprehensive analysis of 29 CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson: geographic distribution, temporal trends, and genetic characteristics. (a) Geographic distribution of 29 CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson. The gray background represents the collection regions for all 141 S. Thompson, the size of the pies represents the numbers of S. Thompson, and the colors of the pies represent the sources of strains. The map image was produced with QGIS 3.8. (b) Distribution of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson from 2010 to 2020. (c) Heatmap of ARGs and plasmid replicons in 29 CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson.
The AMR in S. Thompson was driven by corresponding antimicrobial resistance genotypes
To identify the determinants that contribute to the resistance phenotype, we analyzed ARGs in 29 CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson through WGS. Some 36 distinct acquired ARGs conferring resistance to 10 classes of antimicrobial agents (Fig. 2c) were recorded. The most prevalent resistance genes, sul1 and mph(A), were found in all isolates, followed by aph(6)-Id in 28 isolates, and aph(3'')-Ib, sul2, and tet(A) in 27 isolates each. PMQR genes associated with CIPR exhibited diversity, with qnrS1 and qepA4 detected in 24 isolates, and aac(6’)-Ib-cr and qnrB (specifically qnrB4 in three isolates and qnrB6 in two isolates) identified in the remaining five isolates (Fig. 2c). Additionally, all 29 isolates carry a parC mutation (giving rise to the T57S substitution), which does not confer CIP resistance. Instead, this mutation has been associated with increased sensitivity to ciprofloxacin, potentially acting as a compensatory change, particularly in isolates with concurrent mutations in gyrA (48, 49). Several β-lactamase genes such as blaCMY-2 (n = 23) along with blaTEM-1B (n = 25) were commonly observed, along with blaOXA-1 (n = 3), blaDHA-1 (n = 3), blaCTX-M-55 (n = 1), and blaCMY-61 (n = 1). Notably, the mph(A) gene associated with AZIR was present in all isolates, with three of these also carrying msr(E) or erm(B). Plasmid replicon analysis identified a range of Inc-type plasmids, predominantly IncC (n = 24), followed by IncH (n = 7), IncFII (n = 5), IncFIB (n = 4), and IncR (n = 1) (Fig. 2c). The multidrug-resistant gene cluster SGI1 was not detected in all analyzed isolates.
Clonal transmission and global spreading potential of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson
To further explore the relationship among 29 CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson, we constructed a phylogenetic tree from the core-genome SNP of 141 S. Thompson and categorized them into six distinct lineages: L1 (n = 5), L2 (n = 19), L3 (n = 20), L4 (n = 50), L5 (n = 17), and L6 (n = 30) (Fig. 3a). Notably, the MDR isolates predominantly clustered in lineages L4, L5, and L6 (Fig. 3b). These lineages displayed varied AMR profiles: e.g., L4 isolates expressed resistance to cefotaxime and traditional front-line drugs, including ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, but not commonly to ciprofloxacin and azithromycin. Besides, over half of the isolates in L6 were resistant to most of the tested antimicrobial compounds, including cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin. Similarly, the CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson clustered mainly in L6 (80.0%, 24/30) and L5 (29.4%, 5/17). These L6 isolates shared a close genetic relationship showing a difference of 0–23 SNPs (Fig. 3a; Table S5), suggesting possible clonal expansion of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson across diverse environments. Plasmid distribution varied widely across lineages, with the IncFIB replicon exclusively found in L5 (58.8%, 10/17), while IncC was present in L6 (96.6%, 29/30). The first recorded case of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson carried IncC isolated SHS109 and SHS120 from diarrhea patients in 2013 in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Fujian, with annual detections thereafter up to 2020 (except 2014). The IncHI2/HI2A replicon (n = 54) was widely distributed in four lineages (L3, L4, L5, and L6) but predominantly in lineage L4 (n = 43) (Fig. 3c). In-depth analysis of virulence factors pinpointed SspH1, a critical E3 ubiquitin ligase that plays a role in influencing host cell signaling, especially targeting NF-κB to modulate immune responses and promote the invasion and survival of Salmonella within host cells (50, 51). This virulence factor was predominantly identified in bacterial isolates clustering in L5 (82.4%, 14/17) and L6 (93.3%, 28/30) (Fig. 3a; Table S6), suggesting its critical role in the pathogenicity and spreading of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson. Additionally, the isolates from clinical settings and animal-derived foods spanned all lineages. The chicken-derived isolates belonged to L4 (74.0%, 37/50), L1 (60.0%, 3/5), L3 (35.0%, 7/20), and L2 (10.5%, 2/19), those from aquatic products were found in L2 (47.4%, 9/19), L3 (35.0%, 7/20), L5 (29.4%, 5/17), and L6 (10.0%, 3/30), L4 (2.0%, 1/50) (Table S1). The majority of isolates from aquatic products in L5 and L6 were linked to fish (n = 5).
Fig 3.
Phylogenetic analysis and distribution of antimicrobial resistance profiles and plasmid replicons identified in 141 S. Thompson in China. (a) Phylogenomic relationship among 141 analyzed S. Thompson genomes. The orange branch represents the lineage containing isolates that belong to lineage L6. (b) Distribution of ARG quantities carried by S. Thompson across different lineages. (c) Distribution of the six plasmid replicons across different lineages.
In comparing our 141 S. Thompson with an additional 1,484 S. Thompson ST26 from the NCBI database, we distinguished two new lineages, termed Lineage A and Lineage B. Lineage A encompassed the majority of strains from China, whereas Lineage B mainly included strains from North American countries, such as the USA. All strains identified as L5 and L6 in our study were classified under Lineage A, indicating these CIPRCTXRAZIR strains likely originated and evolved in China. Notably, we observed a close phylogenetic relationship between 19 publicly available IncC-carrying S. Thompson strains from China (11 from patients and eight from turtles) and our 30 isolates of lineage L6, further underscoring the role of aquatic products in the dissemination of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson. Additionally, certain clinical strains from the United States (n = 4) and the United Kingdom (n = 1) also showed close phylogenetic ties to L6 strains, with four of these isolates carrying the IncC plasmid, indicating the potential for international transmission of CIPRCTXRAZIR IncC-carrying S. Thompson (Fig. S2).
IncC plasmids conferring CIPRCTXRAZIR can transfer among S. Thompson
Despite the emergence of co-resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and azithromycin, it remains unclear whether their determinants were located on transferable plasmids or not. To validate the transferability of CIPRCTXRAZIR among these S. Thompson, conjugation experiments were then performed on randomly selected S. Thompson carrying IncC from lineage L6 (SHS120, HBS007, HBS009, HBS011, JXS008, JXS011, GXS168, GXS031, GXS082), and five isolates carrying various non-IncC replicons from L5 (GXS090, GXS166, SCS597, SHS112, SHS119). All isolates carrying IncC replicon successfully transferred their resistances to ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and azithromycin to the recipient, E. coli J53, simultaneously, with frequencies ranging from 10−8 to 10−6. The MICs of the transconjugants against ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and azithromycin increased from 0.015 µg/mL to 8–16 µg/mL, and 0.03 µg/mL to ≥4 µg/mL, and 1 µg/mL to 16–128 µg/mL, respectively. In addition, among the five isolates carrying non-IncC replicons, only one isolate (SHS119), which harbored the IncFIB/HI2/HI2A plasmid replicon, was able to simultaneously transfer resistance to ciprofloxacin (from 0.015 µg/mL to 1 µg/mL), cefotaxime (from 0.03 µg/mL to 1 µg/mL), and azithromycin (from 1 µg/mL to 16 µg/mL) to the recipient (Table S7).
The conjugative IncC plasmids conferring CIPRCTXRAZIR remained conserved
To further verify the location of CIPRCTXRAZIR determinants, we randomly sequenced five isolates from L6 carrying IncC replicon using the nanopore sequencing platform and recorded that the CIPRCTXRAZIR genes were located on IncC plasmid in all five isolates. These five plasmids, with sizes ranging from 141- to 157-kbp, were highly conserved and featured minor variations due to IS elements. Critically, they harbored 13 ARGs, including qnrS1, qepA4, blaCMY-2, and mph(A) conferring resistances to ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and azithromycin, respectively (Fig. 4a). Taking plasmid pGXS168-IncC, one of the five plasmids, for example, the blaCMY-2 gene was located adjacent to ISEcp1 in the conjugative transfer region of the conserved plasmid backbone. The remaining 12 ARGs were located on two multidrug resistance regions (MDRRs, Fig. S3). MDRR1 contained six ARGs, including blaTEM-1B (β-lactam), floR (phenicol), tet(A) (tetracycline), aph(3'')-Ib and aph(6)-Id (aminoglycoside), sul2 (sulfonamide), and MDRR2 contain other six ARGs, including qnrS1 and qepA4 (fluoroquinolone), mph(A) (macrolide), aadA2 (aminoglycoside), sul1 (sulfonamide), dfrA12 (trimethoprim).
Fig 4.
Multiple sequence alignment of IncC plasmids in S. Thompson. (a) Sequence alignment of five local IncC plasmids and four publicly available IncC plasmids of S. Thompson. (b) Sequence alignment of pGXS168-IncC to other IncC-carrying S. Thompson strains in lineage L6.
To explore whether these conserved plasmid sequences were distributed among IncC plasmid-harboring CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson, we compared the genome sequence of all isolates carrying IncC plasmid with plasmid pGXS168-IncC using BLASTn (Fig. 4b). This analysis confirmed that all isolates shared highly similar sequences with the latter. A subsequent BLASTn search against the NCBI nr database yielded four complete plasmids (p846 [Accession: NZ_CP029249], pSH11G0791 [NZ_CP041172], pSal009 [NZ_CP050832], and pSC1-1/2a [NZ_MT560003]) with perfect nucleotide sequence identity and coverage to plasmid pGXS168-IncC. These plasmids all recovered from S. Thompson, which derived from humans (n = 2), poultry (n = 1), and animal-derived food (n = 1) in China (Fig. 4a). Notably, no plasmids closely resembling plasmid pGXS168-IncC were found in bacterial species other than S. Thompson within the NCBI database. Although a similar IncC plasmid (~155–168 kbp) in identified E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis exhibited 100% nucleotide identity and >75% coverage with plasmid pGXS168-IncC, most of these plasmids lacked the six AMR genes, including qnrS1, qepA, and mph(A), present in MDRR2 (Fig. S4 and S5). This suggests a unique formation of clinically important IncC plasmids in S. Thompson. Further investigation into plasmid-host interactions through stability tests of two randomly selected IncC-carrying isolates revealed their high stability over 28 days of subculturing.
Non-IncC plasmids in CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson
In addition to the IncC plasmid, we also analyzed the genetic characteristics of one IncFIB/HI2/HI2A type hybrid plasmid conferring CIPRCTXRAZIR. The IncFIB/HI2/HI2A pSHS119 was 326 kbp in size and had a GC content of 46.9%. It contained 12 ARGs, including aac(6')-Ib-cr, qnrB4, blaDHA-1, blaOXA-1, mph(A), arr-3, aph(3'')-Ib, aph(6)-Id, catB3, sul1, sul2, and tet(A). Plasmid pSHS119 exhibited over 99% nucleotide sequence identity and 63%–74% coverage to two plasmids (273 kbp pK16SI097, CP052938 and 255 kbp pSI67-1, CP050784) from chicken-derived S. enterica serovar Indiana (Fig. 5).
Fig 5.
Comparative sequence analysis of IncFIB/HI2/HI2A plasmid pSHS119.
Correlation of two plasmid replicons and 31 ARGs in S. Thompson
Subsequently, we analyzed the co-occurrence of 31 resistance genes on IncC and IncHI2/HI2A plasmid replicons. The results revealed that IncC plasmid replicon was positively associated with the following 13 ARGs: blaTEM-1B and blaCMY-2 (β-lactam), floR (chloramphenicol), tet(A) (tetracycline), aph(3")-Ib and aph(6)-Id (aminoglycoside), sul2 (sulfonamide), qnrS1 and qepA4 (fluoroquinolone), mph(A) (macrolide), aadA2 (aminoglycoside), sul1 (sulfonamide), and dfrA12 (trimethoprim). This correlation aligns with the ARGs previously described as being carried by IncC plasmid pGXS168-IncC. The IncHl2/HI2A plasmid replicon was found to be significantly associated with more ARGs than the IncC replicon, including blaCTX-M-3, blaCTX-M-65, blaDHA-1, and blaOXA-1 (β-lactam), tet(D) (tetracycline), aac(3)-IV, aac(6')-Ib-cr, aph(3')-Ia, aph(4)-Ia, and aadA5 (aminoglycoside), catA2, cmlA1 (chloramphenicol), dfrA14 and dfrA17 (trimethoprim), qnrB4 (fluoroquinolone), sul3 (sulfonamide), arr-3 (rifamycin), and lnu(F) (lincosamide) (Fig. 6).
Fig 6.
Correlation between ARGs and plasmid replicons. The x axis and y axis represent 31 ARGs and two plasmid replicons, IncC and IncHI2/HI2A. The heatmap displays Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r-values), with orange indicating positive and purple indicating negative correlations. Significance levels are denoted as P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), and P < 0.001 (***).
DISCUSSION
The global prevalence of S. Thompson is on the rise, elevating it to a critical public health issue. This serovar has moved from the 16th to the 10th most important bacterial pathogen, highlighting a 79.2% increase from 2006 to 2016 (6) and causing recent outbreaks in the USA (7). In China, S. Thompson has been sporadically detected in patients (5), animals (52), meats (53, 54), and aquaculture products (55, 56) across multiple provinces over the past decade. Notably, the recent emergence of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson in diarrheic patients from Shanghai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, and Hunan provinces has raised significant health concerns (23, 24, 57). Considering the foodborne nature of Salmonella, controlling CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson in humans necessitates a holistic strategy to address both animal and environmental reservoirs. This study, with its comprehensive collection of 141 S. Thompson from China, covering both clinical and non-human isolate sources over two decades, provides a foundation for in-depth exploration into the phylogeography, population genetics, and evolutionary dynamics of this serovar, particularly in isolates with the CIPRCTXRAZIR phenotype.
The distinctive resistance profiles among various NTS serovars are mediated by either chromosomal mutations or horizontal gene transfer of various plasmids (58). Unlike other MDR serovars, such as Indiana/Kentucky, which harbor plasmid replicons like IncHI2/HI2A, IncX1, and IncI2 along with mutations in gyrA and parC (18, 59), the emergence of CIPRCTXRAZIR phenotypes in S. Thompson is mainly due to a single IncC plasmid, which carries qnrS1, qepA4, blaCMY-2, and mph(A), mediating resistance to three front-line antimicrobial agents. This plasmid, previously identified in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, contained two MDR islands (ARI-A and ARI-B) and a main backbone typically housing the blaCMY-2 gene within the conjugative transfer region (60–62). In this study, IncC plasmids in CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson contains two large resistance regions, MDRR1 and MDRR2, the former of which is similar to the typically described ARI-B (61), alongside a blaTEM-1B gene, and the latter of which carries qnrS1, qepA4, and mph(A) that has never been identified in other Enterobacterales. The integration of qnrS1, qepA4, and mph(A) into IncC plasmids has been previously observed separately through different arrangements of mobile genetic elements (63–65). However, the co-occurrence of these three genes in the same plasmid is rare. Therefore, the emergence of three ARGs, together with blaCMY-2 and other AGRs on a single IncC plasmid within S. Thompson, is of concern, as they mediate resistance to almost all antimicrobial agents for treating salmonellosis.
Plasmids often impose a fitness cost on their bacterial hosts (66). However, the IncC plasmid from CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson has demonstrated remarkable stability and specificity, exemplified by the clone transmission of IncC-carrying strains across various provinces in the south and east of China. Notably, although IncC plasmids have been detected in various Salmonella strains (67, 68), these IncC plasmids conferring CIPRCTXRAZIR remain exclusive to this serovar (S. Thompson), further suggesting that the cross-regional spread of CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson is probably driven by the transmission of dominant adapted clones carrying the IncC plasmid. The emergence of lineage L6, harboring the IncC plasmids and conferring resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents, marks a significant evolutionary event, indicating a relatively recent and specific adaptation of clinically important plasmids within S. Thompson. Nonetheless, the key epidemiological drivers propelling the wide transmission of these clinically important clones remain elusive. The frequent identification of the virulence factor SspH1 within the L6 strain suggests its potential role in enhancing Salmonella infection, which may contribute to its increased clinical detection rates (69). However, further studies are needed to confirm whether this heightened presence is indeed due to the functional activities of SspH1. Furthermore, the predominance of clinically important clones in L6, primarily composed of isolates from both patients and aquatic products, hints at a connection with the trade in aquatic food products, which has been proven in previous research (57). In this study, the strains of L6 derived from aquatic products were mainly isolated from freshwater fish, and there is additional evidence that turtles are also reservoirs of S. Thompson (70–72). Notably, certain provinces in southern China have a dietary tradition of consuming soft-shelled turtles. Thus, the trade of aquatic products, particularly turtles, may play a role in the spread of this clinically important clone across various regions (73). Moreover, the presence of five clinical S. Thompson harboring the similarity IncC plasmid from USA and EU countries interspersed among Chinese isolates indicates the potential for interhost and international spreading.
The diversity in resistance phenotypes among S. Thompson may reflect host-specific factors and distinct antimicrobial selection pressures in various animal-derived food production settings (74). Over the past decade, intensive animal farming in China has witnessed a rapid increase, leading to the extensive use of antimicrobial compounds in livestock, poultry, and aquatic animal production (75, 76). Chinese aquaculture has utilized more than 20 different antimicrobials (77). Despite certain antimicrobial agents, such as chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and erythromycin, being officially prohibited in aquaculture since 2002, their presence in high concentrations within aquaculture products indicates potential illicit application in this industry (77, 78). Notably, the majority of these antimicrobial compounds are not metabolized by aquatic organisms, rather, they enter the aquatic ecosystem as residues, intensifying the selective pressure on aquatic bacteria (79). For instance, aquatic environments can act as hotspots for transferable quinolone resistance, significantly exacerbating the spread of antibiotic resistance in aquatic ecosystems (80). Furthermore, ARGs and antimicrobial compounds from hospital wastewater, agricultural runoff, and urban sewage inevitably converge in these ecosystems, amplifying the challenge of AMR within the One Health framework (81, 82). These factors exert significant selective pressure on aquatic bacteria, doing some to facilitate the emerging and spreading of IncC-carrying CIPRCTXRAZIR S. Thompson. The intricate web of antimicrobial usage and environmental contamination fuels the resistance crisis in terrestrial animal farming as well. For instance, the ARGs-carrying IncHI2/IncHI2A plasmid, identified in the chicken-derived S. Thompson in this study, is prevalent in multiple NTS (83, 84). Given the direct link between animal-derived foods and human health, the observed resistance patterns in S. Thompson pose a real threat by potentially enabling the direct transmission of these dominant clones from food supply to humans, thereby exacerbating the public health crisis related to AMR.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank all participants for their support of this study.
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1800400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871899), and the Pinduoduo-China Agricultural University Research Fund (PC2023A01002).
W.Z., D.L., Y.W., and L.B. conceived and designed the study; M.L., P.D., and R.L. carried out the analyses; S.C., Y.L., D.T., X.Y.Z., B.Y., and X.M.Z. collected and prepared the strains. W.Z., M.L., L.Z., L.L., and P.D. drafted the manuscript and generated the figures. S.F., Y.W., and L.B. made critical revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and agreed to publication.
AFTER EPUB
[This article was published on 12 February 2025 with errors in the presentation of figures in the PDF. The PDF was corrected in the current version, posted on 4 March 2025.]
Contributor Information
Yang Wang, Email: wangyang@cau.edu.cn.
Li Bai, Email: baili@cfsa.net.cn.
Zoe A. Dyson, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
DATA AVAILABILITY
The sequence data of all isolates have been submitted to NCBI under BioProject accession number PRJNA1204499.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01018-24.
Fig. S1 to S5.
Tables S1 to S7.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Majowicz SE, Musto J, Scallan E, Angulo FJ, Kirk M, O’Brien SJ, Jones TF, Fazil A, Hoekstra RM, International Collaboration on Enteric Disease “Burden of Illness” Studies . . 2010. The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis 50:882–889. doi: 10.1086/650733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Stanaway JD, Parisi A, Sarkar K, Blacker BF, Reiner RC, Hay SI, Nixon MR, Dolecek C, James SL, Mokdad AH. 2019. The global burden of non-typhoidal Salmonella invasive disease: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis 19:1312–1324. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30418-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tennant SM, MacLennan CA, Simon R, Martin LB, Khan MI. 2016. Nontyphoidal Salmonella disease: current status of vaccine research and development. Vaccine (Auckl) 34:2907–2910. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Worley J, Meng J, Allard MW, Brown EW, Timme RE. 2018. Salmonella enterica phylogeny based on whole-genome sequencing reveals two new clades and novel patterns of horizontally acquired genetic elements. MBio 9:e02303-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02303-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Li W, Han H, Liu J, Ke B, Zhan L, Yang X, Tan D, Yu B, Huo X, Ma X, Wang T, Chen S, Sun Y, Chen W, Li Y, Liu C, Yang Z, Guo Y. 2023. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from human diarrhea cases in China: an eight-year surveilance study. One Health Adv 1. doi: 10.1186/s44280-023-00001-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Prevention CfDCa . 2018. National enteric disease surveillance: Salmonella annual report. Diseases NCfEaZI. https://www.cdc.gov/nationalsurveillance/pdfs/2016-Salmonella-report-508.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Shen AQ, Dalen A, Bankers L, Matzinger SR, Schwensohn C, Patel K, Hise KB, Pereira E, Cripe J, Jervis RH. 2023. Multistate outbreak of Salmonella Thompson infections linked to seafood exposure - United States, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly 72:513–516. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7219a2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Shapiro R, Ackers ML, Lance S, Rabbani M, Schaefer L, Daugherty J, Thelen C, Swerdlow D. 1999. Salmonella Thompson associated with improper handling of roast beef at a restaurant in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. J Food Prot 62:118–122. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.2.118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Campbell JV, Mohle-Boetani J, Reporter R, Abbott S, Farrar J, Brandl M, Mandrell R, Werner SB. 2001. An outbreak of Salmonella serotype Thompson associated with fresh cilantro. J Infect Dis 183:984–987. doi: 10.1086/319254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Nygård K, Lassen J, Vold L, Andersson Y, Fisher I, Löfdahl S, Threlfall J, Luzzi I, Peters T, Hampton M, Torpdahl M, Kapperud G, Aavitsland P. 2008. Outbreak of Salmonella Thompson infections linked to imported rucola lettuce. Foodborne Pathog Dis 5:165–173. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2007.0053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Friesema I, de Jong A, Hofhuis A, Heck M, van den Kerkhof H, de Jonge R, Hameryck D, Nagel K, van Vilsteren G, van Beek P, Notermans D, van Pelt W. 2014. Large outbreak of Salmonella Thompson related to smoked salmon in the Netherlands, August to December 2012. Euro Surveill 19:20918. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.39.20918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Eun Y, Jeong H, Kim S, Park W, Ahn B, Kim D, Kim E, Park E, Park S, Hwang I, Son H. 2019. A large outbreak of Salmonella enterica serovar Thompson infections associated with chocolate cake in Busan, Korea. Epidemiol Health 41:e2019002. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lee S, Park N, Yun S, Hur E, Song J, Lee H, Kim Y, Ryu S. 2021. Presence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes in non-typhoidal Salmonella strains with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones isolated from human salmonellosis in Gyeonggi-do, South Korea from 2016 to 2019. Gut Pathog 13:35. doi: 10.1186/s13099-021-00431-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Crump JA, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Gordon MA, Parry CM. 2015. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive Salmonella infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:901–937. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Prevention CfDCa . 2019. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States
- 16. European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control . 2022. The European Union Summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2019–2020. EFS2 20:e07209. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Le Hello S, Harrois D, Bouchrif B, Sontag L, Elhani D, Guibert V, Zerouali K, Weill F-X. 2013. Highly drug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198-X1: a microbiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 13:672–679. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70124-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Du P, Liu X, Liu Y, Li R, Lu X, Cui S, Wu Y, Fanning S, Bai L. 2022. Dynamics of antimicrobial resistance and genomic epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Indiana ST17 from 2006 to 2017 in China. mSystems 7:e0025322. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00253-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Chen K, Yang C, Chan EW, Chen S. 2021. Emergence of conjugative IncC type plasmid simultaneously encoding resistance to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin in Salmonella. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e0104621. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01046-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chen K, Yang C, Dong N, Xie M, Ye L, Chan EWC, Chen S. 2020. Evolution of ciprofloxacin resistance-encoding genetic elements in Salmonella. mSystems 5:e01234-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.01234-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Nadimpalli M, Fabre L, Yith V, Sem N, Gouali M, Delarocque-Astagneau E, Sreng N, Le Hello S, Raheliarivao BT, Randrianirina F, et al. 2019. CTX-M-55-type ESBL-producing Salmonella enterica are emerging among retail meats in Phnom Penh, Cambodia . J Antimicrob Chemother 74:342–348. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Xie M, Chen K, Chan EW-C, Chen S. 2022. Identification and genetic characterization of two conjugative plasmids that confer azithromycin resistance in Salmonella Emerg Microbes Infect 11:1049–1057. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2058420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zeng X, Lv S, Qu C, Lan L, Tan D, Li X, Bai L. 2021. Serotypes, antibiotic resistance, and molecular characterization of non-typhoidal Salmonella isolated from diarrheic patients in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, 2014–2017. Food Control 120:107478. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107478 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lu M, Zhai WS, Du PC, Wang Y, Zhan ZF, Chen S, Jia HY, Bai L. 2022. Molecular characteristics of ciprofloxacin-cefotaxime-azithromycin co-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Thompson in foodborne diseases in Hunan Province. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 56:1745–1750. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220112-00046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jacobson A, Wallace H, Andrews HW, Ge B, Zhang G, Hammack T. 2024. Food and Drug Administration: bacteriological analytical manual on-line. Chapter 5, Salmonella. https://www.fda.gov/media/178914/download?attachment.
- 26. Issenhuth-Jeanjean S, Roggentin P, Mikoleit M, Guibourdenche M, de Pinna E, Nair S, Fields PI, Weill F-X. 2014. Supplement 2008-2010 (no. 48) to the White-Kauffmann-Le Minor scheme. Res Microbiol 165:526–530. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. CLSI . 2020. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing—Thirtieth Edition: M100 [Google Scholar]
- 28. FDA . 2021. NARMS interpretive criteria for susceptibility testing. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/108180/download?attachment. Retrieved Jun 8 Jun 2021.
- 29. Souvorov A, Agarwala R, Lipman DJ. 2018. SKESA: strategic k-mer extension for scrupulous assemblies. Genome Biol 19:153. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1540-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hall M, Maguire F, Monzón S, Anson M. 2021. Snippy: rapid haploid variant calling and core genome alignment. Github. https://github.com/tseemann/snippy.
- 32. Croucher NJ, Page AJ, Connor TR, Delaney AJ, Keane JA, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, Harris SR. 2015. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res 43:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, Philippon A, Allesoe RL, Rebelo AR, Florensa AF, et al. 2020. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In Silico detection and typing of plasmids using plasmidfinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhang S, Yin Y, Jones MB, Zhang Z, Deatherage Kaiser BL, Dinsmore BA, Fitzgerald C, Fields PI, Deng X. 2015. Salmonella serotype determination utilizing high-throughput genome sequencing data. J Clin Microbiol 53:1685–1692. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00323-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Tseemann . Github. Accessed 28 October 2022. https://github.com/tseemann/mlst.
- 38. Jolley KA, Maiden MC. 2010. BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 11:595. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. NCBI . 2022. BLAST+ 2.13.0 Now available with SRA BLAST, ARM Linux executables, and database metadata. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2022/03/29/blast-2-13-0.
- 40. Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q. 2016. VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis—10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D694–D697. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, et al. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J. 2009. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics 25:119–120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Alikhan NF, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. 2011. BLAST ring image generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. He T, Wei R, Zhang L, Sun L, Pang M, Wang R, Wang Y. 2017. Characterization of NDM-5-positive extensively resistant Escherichia coli isolates from dairy cows. Vet Microbiol 207:153–158. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Smith AM, Govender N, Keddy KH, Group for Enteric, Respiratory and Meningeal Disease Surveillance in South Africa (GERMS-SA) . 2010. Quinolone-resistant Salmonella typhi in South Africa, 2003-2007. Epidemiol Infect 138:86–90. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809990331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Eaves DJ, Randall L, Gray DT, Buckley A, Woodward MJ, White AP, Piddock LJV. 2004. Prevalence of mutations within the quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE and association with antibiotic resistance in quinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:4012–4015. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.10.4012-4015.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Haraga A, Miller SI. 2003. A Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium translocated leucine-rich repeat effector protein inhibits NF-kappa B-dependent gene expression. Infect Immun 71:4052–4058. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.7.4052-4058.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Keszei AFA, Tang X, McCormick C, Zeqiraj E, Rohde JR, Tyers M, Sicheri F. 2014. Structure of an SspH1-PKN1 complex reveals the basis for host substrate recognition and mechanism of activation for a bacterial E3 ubiquitin ligase. Mol Cell Biol 34:362–373. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01360-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Shi W, Tang W, Li Y, Han Y, Cui L, Sun S. 2023. Comparative analysis between Salmonella enterica isolated from imported and Chinese native chicken breeds. Microorganisms 11:390. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Zhou M, Li X, Hou W, Wang H, Paoli GC, Shi X. 2019. Incidence and characterization of Salmonella isolates from raw meat products sold at small markets in Hubei province, China. Front Microbiol 10:2265. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Li L, Olsen RH, Xiao J, Liang M, Meng H, Peng S. 2022. Characterization of extended-spectrum cephalosporins and fluoroquinolone resistance of a Salmonella enterica serovar Thompson isolate from ready-to-eat pork product in China. Front Microbiol 13:964009. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.964009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Zhang J, Yang X, Kuang D, Shi X, Xiao W, Zhang J, Gu Z, Xu X, Meng J. 2015. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance of non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars in retail aquaculture products. Int J Food Microbiol 210:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Zhang J, Kuang D, Wang F, Meng J, Jin H, Yang X, Liao M, Klena JD, Wu S, Zhang Y, Xu X. 2016. Turtles as a possible reservoir of nontyphoidal Salmonella in Shanghai, China. Foodborne Pathog Dis 13:428–433. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2015.2107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zhang Z, Kuang D, Xu X, Zhan Z, Ren H, Shi C. 2024. Dissemination of IncC plasmids in Salmonella enterica serovar Thompson recovered from seafood and human diarrheic patients in China. Int J Food Microbiol 417:110708. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Pornsukarom S, van Vliet AHM, Thakur S. 2018. Whole genome sequencing analysis of multiple Salmonella serovars provides insights into phylogenetic relatedness, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence markers across humans, food animals and agriculture environmental sources. BMC Genomics 19:801. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5137-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Hawkey J, Le Hello S, Doublet B, Granier SA, Hendriksen RS, Fricke WF, Ceyssens P-J, Gomart C, Billman-Jacobe H, Holt KE, Weill F-X. 2019. Global phylogenomics of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198. Microb Genom 5:e000269. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Zhang Y, Lei C-W, Chen X, Yao T-G, Yu J-W, Hu W-L, Mao X, Wang H-N. 2020. Characterization of IncC plasmids in Enterobacterales of food-producing animals originating from China. Front Microbiol 11:580960. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.580960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Cheng Q, Jiang X, Xu Y, Hu L, Luo W, Yin Z, Gao H, Yang W, Yang H, Zhao Y, Zhao X, Zhou D, Dai E. 2019. Type 1, 2, and 1/2-hybrid IncC plasmids from China. Front Microbiol 10:2508. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Harmer CJ, Hall RM. 2015. The A to Z of A/C plasmids. Plasmid 80:63–82. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2015.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Noguchi N, Emura A, Matsuyama H, O’Hara K, Sasatsu M, Kono M. 1995. Nucleotide sequence and characterization of erythromycin resistance determinant that encodes macrolide 2’-phosphotransferase I in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:2359–2363. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.10.2359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Poirel L, Leviandier C, Nordmann P. 2006. Prevalence and genetic analysis of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants QnrA and QnrS in Enterobacteriaceae isolates from a French university hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3992–3997. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00597-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Yamane K, Wachino J-I, Suzuki S, Kimura K, Shibata N, Kato H, Shibayama K, Konda T, Arakawa Y. 2007. New plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone efflux pump, QepA, found in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:3354–3360. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00339-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Risely A, Newbury A, Stalder T, Simmons BI, Top EM, Buckling A, Sanders D. 2024. Host- plasmid network structure in wastewater is linked to antimicrobial resistance genes. Nat Commun 15:555. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44827-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Kariuki S, Gordon MA, Feasey N, Parry CM. 2015. Antimicrobial resistance and management of invasive Salmonella disease. Vaccine (Auckl) 33 Suppl 3:C21–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Hoffmann M, Pettengill JB, Gonzalez-Escalona N, Miller J, Ayers SL, Zhao S, Allard MW, McDermott PF, Brown EW, Monday SR. 2017. Comparative sequence analysis of multidrug-resistant IncA/C plasmids from Salmonella enterica Front Microbiol 8:1459. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Herod A, Emond-Rheault J-G, Tamber S, Goodridge L, Lévesque RC, Rohde J. 2022. Genomic and phenotypic analysis of SspH1 identifies a new Salmonella effector, SspH3. Mol Microbiol 117:770–789. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Wang W, Liu F, Li H, Li M, Hu Y, Li F, Xiao J, Dong Y. 2024. Emergence and genomic characteristics of multi-drug-resistant Salmonella in pet turtles and children with diarrhoea. Microb Genom 10:001164. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Colon VA, Lugsomya K, Lam HK, Wahl LC, Parkes RSV, Cormack CA, Horlbog JA, Stevens M, Stephan R, Magouras I. 2022. Serotype diversity and antimicrobial resistance profile of Salmonella enterica isolates from freshwater turtles sold for human consumption in wet markets indiversity and antimicrobial resistance profile odiversity and antimicrobial resistance profile o Hong Kong. Front Vet Sci 9:912693. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.912693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Marin C, Ingresa-Capaccioni S, González-Bodi S, Marco-Jiménez F, Vega S. 2013. Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter. PLoS ONE 8:e72350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Van Dijk PP, Stuart BL, Rhodin AG. 2000. Asian turtle trade: proceedings of a workshop on conservation and trade of freshwater turtles and tortoises in Asia–Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 1-4 December 1999. Mass: Chelonian Research Foundation, Lunenburg. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Mellor KC, Petrovska L, Thomson NR, Harris K, Reid SWJ, Mather AE. 2019. Antimicrobial resistance diversity suggestive of distinct Salmonella Typhimurium sources or selective pressures in Food-production animals. Front Microbiol 10:708. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Zhao Q, Jiang Z, Li T, Cheng M, Sun H, Cui M, Zhang C, Xu S, Wang H, Wu C. 2023. Current status and trends in antimicrobial use in food animals in China, 2018–2020. One Health Adv 1:29. doi: 10.1186/s44280-023-00029-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Okocha RC, Olatoye IO, Adedeji OB. 2018. Food safety impacts of antimicrobial use and their residues in aquaculture. Public Health Rev 39:21. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0099-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Liu X, Steele JC, Meng X-Z. 2017. Usage, residue, and human health risk of antibiotics in Chinese aquaculture: a review. Environ Pollut 223:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Mo WY, Chen Z, Leung HM, Leung AOW. 2017. Application of veterinary antibiotics in China’s aquaculture industry and their potential human health risks. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:8978–8989. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5607-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Zhao Y, Yang QE, Zhou X, Wang F-H, Muurinen J, Virta MP, Brandt KK, Zhu Y-G. 2021. Antibiotic resistome in the livestock and aquaculture industries: status and solutions. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 51:2159–2196. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2020.1777815 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Miranda CDConcha CGodoy FA, Lee MR. 2022. Aquatic environments as hotspots of transferable low-level quinolone resistance and their potential contribution to high-level quinolone resistance. Antibiotics 11:1487. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Buelow E, Rico A, Gaschet M, Lourenço J, Kennedy SP, Wiest L, Ploy M-C, Dagot C. 2020. Hospital discharges in urban sanitation systems: long-term monitoring of wastewater resistome and microbiota in relationship to their eco-exposome. Water Res X 7:100045. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Zhang Y, Walsh TR, Wang Y, Shen J, Yang M. 2022. Minimizing risks of antimicrobial resistance development in the environment from a public one health perspective. China CDC Wkly 4:1105–1109. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2022.224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Chen W, Fang T, Zhou X, Zhang D, Shi X, Shi C. 2016. IncHI2 plasmids are predominant in antibiotic-resistant Salmonella isolates. Front Microbiol 7:1566. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Zhang H, Xiang Y, Huang Y, Liang B, Xu X, Xie J, Du X, Yang C, Liu H, Liu H, Wang H, Yang M, Wang L, Hu X, Jin L, Li J, Jiang Y, Qiu S, Song H. 2021. Genetic characterization of mcr-1-positive multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium isolated from intestinal infection in children and pork offal in China. Front Microbiol 12:774797. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.774797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Hall M, Maguire F, Monzón S, Anson M. 2021. Snippy: rapid haploid variant calling and core genome alignment. Github. https://github.com/tseemann/snippy.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1 to S5.
Tables S1 to S7.
Data Availability Statement
The sequence data of all isolates have been submitted to NCBI under BioProject accession number PRJNA1204499.






