Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences logoLink to The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
. 2009 Jul 13;22(3):126–134. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70232-3

Operating Room Costs of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Does Surgeon Volume Matter?

Wei‐Ching Chung 1, King‐Teh Lee 1,2, Pao‐Luo Fan 1,3, Dong‐Sheng Tzeng 1,4, Herng‐Chia Chiu 1,5,✉
PMCID: PMC11917713  PMID: 16602277

Abstract

Very few studies have addressed the issue of surgeon volume on cost savings of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in Asian countries. The objectives of the study were to analyze LC operating‐room (OR) costs between two study hospitals and to examine the effect of surgeon volume on OR costs. Patients diagnosed with gallbladder disease who underwent LC in October through December 2002 at two acute tertiary‐care hospitals were included. Patient demographics and clinical information were derived from patient charts. Cost information was obtained from purchasing departments or specific cost centers. Three multivariate linear regression models were performed to examine the association between surgeon volume, cost, and utilization. There were no significant differences in patient demographics and disease severity between the two hospitals. Hospital A consumed fewer resources than did hospital B (NT$21,674 vs NT$26,417). Direct materials cost, direct professional costs, and indirect costs varied significantly by study hospital and by surgeon volume. High‐volume surgeons incurred lower costs and shorter stay as compared with low‐volume surgeons. Patients who scored in the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) 3 incurred significantly higher costs and longer hospital stays than did patients with ASA PS 1. The present study supports the proposal that hospital management and experience of surgeons are of equal importance in maintaining the standing of hospitals in competitive positions. In addition to the differences in hospital management and surgeon volume, the patient severity of illness also needs to be taken into consideration in cost containment.

Keywords: cost, volume, laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (227.7 KB).

References

  • 1. Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, et al. Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg. 1990; 211: 60–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Glavic Z, Begic L, Simlesa D, et al. Treatment of acute cholecystitis. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15: 398–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Vanek VW, Rhodes R, Dallis DJ. Results of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital. South Med J. 1995; 88: 555–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Watson DI, Mathew G, Williams JA. Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a major teaching hospital: clinical and hospital outcomes. Med J Aust. 1995; 163: 527–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Anonymous . Use these data to benchmark cholecystectomy costs. Data Strateg Benchmarks. 1999; 3: 12–14 –, 1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mushinski M. Average charges for cholecystectomy open and laparoscopic procedures, 1994. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1995; 76: 21–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lang HC, Chi C, Liu CM. Impact of the case payment reimbursement method on the utilization and costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Health Policy. 2004; 67: 195–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Koch MO, Smith JA Jr. Clinical outcomes associated with the implementation of a cost‐efficient programme for radical retropubic prostatectomy. Br J Urol. 1995; 76: 28–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ladocsi LT, Benitez LD, Filippone DR, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 734 consecutive cases. Am Surg. 1997; 63: 150–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ure BM, Lefering R, Troidl H. Costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Analysis of potential savings. Surg Endosc. 1995; 9: 401–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979; 301: 1364–1369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Phillips KA, Luft HS, Ritchie JL. The association of hospital volumes of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with adverse outcomes, length of stay, and charges in California. Med Care. 1995; 33: 502–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hannan EL, O'Donnell JF, Kilburn H Jr, et al. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York state hospitals. JAMA. 1989; 262: 503–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Katz JN, Phillips CB, Baron JA, et al. Association of hospital and surgeon volume of total hip replacement with functional status and satisfaction three years following surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48: 560–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rosemurgy AS, Bloomston M, Serafini FM, et al. Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in‐hospital mortality. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001; 5: 21–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Janik JS, Janik JE. Short‐stay open appendectomy. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004; 14: 25–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lee KT, Chang WT, Huang MC, et al. Influence of surgeon volume on clinical and economic outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg. 2004; 21: 406–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. de Pouvourville G, Ribet‐Reinhart N, Fendrick M, et al. A prospective comparison of costs and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997; 44: 35–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Berggren U, Zethraeus N, Arvidsson D, et al. A cost‐ minimization analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1996; 172: 305–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Watson DI, Mathew G, Williams JA. Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a major teaching hospital: clinical and hospital outcomes. Med J Aust. 1995; 163: 527–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Weiland DE, Caruso DM, Wesche DE, et al. How managed care may choose hospitals for contracts for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 1997; 1: 285–288. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fu L, Hsu N, Chen C, et al. The related factors of operation costs and charges for operating rooms. VGH Nursing. 1995; 12: 305–314. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lin HC, Yang CH, Chen CC, et al. Hospital ownership and its effect on medical cost from case payment using data from cesarean section patients. Tzu Chi University Department of Medicine. 2003; 15: 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Macario A, Vitez TS, Dunn B, et al. Hospital costs and severity of illness in three types of elective surgery. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86: 92–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Strum DP, Sampson AR, May JH, et al. Surgeon and type of anesthesia predict variability in surgical procedure times. Anesthesiology. 2000; 92: 1454–1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Traverso LW, Hargrave K. A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1995; 169: 503–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Forrest JB, Rehder K, Cahalan MK, et al. Multicenter study of general anesthesia. III. Predictors of severe perioperative adverse outcomes. Anesthesiology. 1992; 76: 3–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cullen DJ, Nemeskal AR, Cooper JB, et al. Effect of pulse oximetry, age, and ASA physical status on the frequency of patients admitted unexpectedly to a postoperative intensive care unit and the severity of their anesthesia‐related complications. Anesth Analg. 1992; 74: 181–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Demoulin L, Kesteloot K, Penninckx F. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1996; 10: 520–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Champault A, Vons C, Dagher I, et al. Low‐cost laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2002; 89: 1602–1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Kaohsiung Medical University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd

RESOURCES