Abstract
While problem‐based learning (PBL) is a teaching strategy to promote critical thinking, creativity and self‐directedness in learning is very important. It is the meaning of the learning, with a contextual understanding, that marks the significance of this approach in our healthcare education. At the 2008 Kaohsiung Medical University International Conference and Workshop on PBL, the scholarly discourse on sharing empirical findings and practical experience with various aspects of PBL brought forth the importance of the teachers' continued learning about the meaning, the dynamics of the process, and the pragmatic details of PBL. This quest for a continuous learning and understanding about PBL parallels our search to extend the classroom PBL into students' clinical experience. The development of clinical teachers in the understanding of PBL was explored as part of their experiential learning in clinical teaching after their PBL workshops. While the clinical teachers who participated in the project appreciated the merits of clinical PBL, the complex balance between patient service and student teaching—in an unpredictable clinical setting—has led to the use of a simulated clinical environment with simulated patients. We also piloted PBL for interprofessional education of undergraduate students of nursing and social work. The ways we can adopt PBL in various settings with different intents will help prepare our healthcare graduates in meeting the challenges of our ever more complex healthcare systems, and the demands of holistic patient care.
Keywords: classroom problem‐based learning, clinical problem‐based learning, dynamics, simulation, teacher development
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (164.3 KB).
References
- 1. Dewey J. Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. 1938, 33–50. [Google Scholar]
- 2. O'Neil PA, Willis SC, Jones A. A model of how students link problem‐based learning with clinical experience through “elaboration”. Acad Med. 2002; 77: 552–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. van Mannen MV. Researching Lived Experience. Human Science for an Action Research Pedagogy. New York: State University of New York Press. 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jerlock M, Falk K, Severinsson E. Academic nursing education guidelines: tools for bridging the gap between theory, research and practice. Nurs Health Sci. 2003; 5: 219–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Price A, Price B. Problem‐based learning in clinical practice facilitating critical thinking. J Nurs Staff Dev. 2000; 16: 257–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wong FKY, Chan EA, Cheung SCM, et al. Problembased learning: an innovative model for clinical education. In Chan WCS, Lopez V, Wong AM, et al., eds. Evidence‐based Nursing Education and Related Issues. Hong Kong: Ming Pao Publication Ltd. 2004, 40–56. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gosling S. The education and practice agenda for interprofessional teaching and learning. In Carlisle C, Donovan T, Mercer D, eds. Interprofessional Education: An Agenda for Healthcare Professionals. Salisbury: Quay Books, MA Healthcare Ltd. 2005, 11–22. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Fowler P, Hannigan B, Northway R. Community nurses and social workers learning together: a report of an interprofessional education initiative in South Wales. Health Soc Care Community. 2000; 8: 186–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]