Skip to main content
Food Chemistry: X logoLink to Food Chemistry: X
. 2025 Feb 20;26:102298. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102298

Advancing food safety with biogenic silver nanoparticles: Addressing antimicrobial resistance, sustainability, and commercial viability

Himanshu Jangid a, Harish Chandra Joshi b, Joydeep Dutta a, Akil Ahmad c, Mohammed B Alshammari c, Kaizar Hossain d,, Gaurav Pant e,, Gaurav Kumar a,f,
PMCID: PMC11919607  PMID: 40109906

Abstract

The escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly among foodborne pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes, necessitates innovative solutions beyond conventional antimicrobials. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have garnered significant attention for their broad-spectrum antimicrobial efficacy, ability to target multidrug-resistant strains, and versatile applications across the food sector. This review critically examines AgNPs' integration into food safety strategies, including their roles in antimicrobial food packaging, agricultural productivity enhancement, and livestock disease mitigation. Key advancements in eco-friendly synthesis methods, leveraging algae, agricultural byproducts, and microbial systems, are highlighted as pathways to address scalability, sustainability, and cost constraints. However, the potential risks of silver bioaccumulation, environmental toxicity, and regulatory challenges present significant barriers to their widespread implementation. By reviewing cutting-edge research, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of AgNP efficacy, safety, and commercial viability, proposing a roadmap for overcoming current limitations. It calls for collaborative, interdisciplinary efforts to bridge technological, ecological, and regulatory gaps, positioning AgNPs as a transformative solution for combating AMR and ensuring global food security.

Keywords: Silver nanoparticles, Foodborne pathogens, Antimicrobial resistance, Green synthesis, Food safety

Highlights

  • Biogenic AgNPs revolutionize control of foodborne pathogens and antimicrobial resistance.

  • Advanced Green synthesis ensures sustainable and scalable AgNP applications in food safety.

  • AgNPs enhance food packaging, processing, and agriculture by reducing contamination.

  • Regulatory frameworks and eco-safeguards are key to AgNP adoption globally.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a grave threat to public health, food safety, and global economic stability. The World Health Organization (WHO) projects that by 2050, AMR could cause up to 10 million deaths annually, surpassing cancer as a leading cause of mortality (Salam et al., 2023). Foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter jejuni are particularly concerning, as they are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality while exhibiting increasing resistance to antibiotics (de Oliveira et al., 2024). Globally, the misuse of antimicrobials in agriculture is a primary driver of AMR in foodborne pathogens. An estimated 73 % of antimicrobials are used in livestock, often at subtherapeutic levels to promote growth and prevent disease, fostering the selection of resistant strains (The FAO Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance, 2021–2025, 2021). Studies have shown that Campylobacter jejuni exhibits resistance to fluoroquinolones in over 40 % of isolates worldwide, while E. coli has developed resistance to multiple antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone, threatening the efficacy of critical treatments (Mencía-Gutiérrez et al., 2024). Foodborne AMR infections impose a substantial health and economic burden. In 2019, Europe alone reported over 30,000 deaths linked to foodborne AMR infections, with total healthcare and productivity losses estimated at over €1.1 billion annually (“EU Action on Antimicrobial Resistance - European Commission,”, 2024). In the U.S., foodborne AMR infections are estimated to account for 400,000 cases annually, primarily attributed to Salmonella and Campylobacter (Samtiya et al., 2022). With traditional antibiotics losing their efficacy, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have emerged as a promising alternative. AgNPs exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and are effective against multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of Listeria monocytogenes and E. coli by disrupting cell membranes and generating reactive oxygen species (Chandraker & Kumar, 2024; Kah et al., 2023; More et al., 2023).

Despite their promise, the application of AgNPs in food systems faces challenges related to toxicity and environmental accumulation. Regulatory agencies, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have developed strict guidelines for the safe use of nanomaterials in food applications (EFSA Scientific Committee et al. Markowska et al., 2018). The FAO has also emphasized the need for risk assessment frameworks to ensure the safe integration of AgNPs into food systems (FAO, 2014). This review critically evaluates the potential of AgNPs as antimicrobial agents against MDR foodborne pathogens. It examines their mechanisms of action, synergistic effects with antibiotics, and applications in food systems while addressing the regulatory, environmental, and safety challenges associated with their use. By reviewing the latest research and identifying gaps in knowledge, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on leveraging AgNPs to mitigate AMR in foodborne pathogens.

2. Mechanisms of action and efficacy of silver nanoparticles

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) constitute a significant player in overcoming multidrug-resistant pathogens. Their apparent antibacterial effectiveness stems from unique physicochemical properties that support multiplexed mechanisms of action, thus rendering them distinctly different from conventional antibiotics. Unlike antibiotics acting on a single pathway, AgNPs exploit a multitargeted approach, reducing the possibility of resistance development. The molecular mechanisms underpinning their efficacy and evaluate their relative effectiveness in comparison with conventional antimicrobials. The core action of AgNPs against bacteria is related to their membrane disruption activity. Due to their large surface-area-to-volume ratio and high surface reactivity, electrostatic interactions between AgNPs with the negatively charged bacterial membrane serve to structurally disrupt it. The increased membrane permeability and leakage from bacterial cytoplasmic contents are effective means for compromising bacterial viability. Recent research has demonstrated changes in morphologies due to silver nanoparticles in Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. This includes ripping off the membrane and cell shrinking as observed using electron microscopy (Summer et al., 2024). Besides these physical damages, reactive oxygen species like hydroxyl radicals and superoxide ions are formed. ROS leads to oxidative stress that disrupts the lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids; therefore, injuring the cells and leading to cell death. The ROS-mediated pathway is the most effective in disrupting biofilms, which are recognized for their high resistance to antibiotics (Juan et al., 2021). The next important mechanism of action is in the interaction of AgNPs with bacterial proteins and enzymes. By binding with the sulfur and phosphorus-containing functional groups, AgNPs inactivate important pathways of enzymatic functions that disrupt cellular respiration and energy production. This also causes a disturbance in protein folding, thus further limiting bacterial metabolic functions. Another important mechanism is DNA interaction. AgNPs enter the bacterial cell and interact with genetic material, inhibiting its replication and transcription. Such a mode of multidimensional disruption in the cell machinery explains the broad-spectrum activity of AgNPs against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria as depicted in Fig. 1 (Leão et al., 2024).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mechanism of antimicrobial action of silver nanoparticle involving four key prominent routes taken from (Dakal et al., 2016).

AgNPs have a few comparative advantages over common antibiotics. Unlike the common antibiotics mainly work through specific bacterial processes, AgNPs work in disturbing physical, oxidative, and biochemical processes. For example, according to the latest experimental studies, AgNPs showed an 85 % reduction of Salmonella enterica growth in contaminated poultry samples than the common antibiotics, ciprofloxacin (Dias de Emery et al., 2022). Most importantly, AgNPs demonstrate synergistic effects, making their efficacy increase up to 70 % with antibiotics. This synergistic effect promotes a reduction in dosages of required antibiotics that could reduce side effects and retard the growth of resistance (Nqakala et al., 2021). Apart from the inherent antimicrobial activity, the multi-functionality of AgNPs disrupts biofilms as well as interferes with quorum sensing - one of the most important ways by which bacteria coordinate their virulence and resistance. Biofilm inhibition is highly effective against pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Listeria monocytogenes for which the effectiveness of antibiotics is limited (de Lacerda Coriolano et al., 2020). In addition, their application in food safety has been promising, where silver nanoparticle-coated packaging materials extend the shelf life of perishable commodities by preventing microbial contamination (Mathew & Radhakrishnan, 2021; Rao et al., 2024). However, despite these positive features, the use of silver nanoparticles in applications poses certain challenges as well. Given the cytotoxic activity and persistence of AgNPs in the environment, safe synthesis and controlled application methods have been an interesting research area. The European Food Safety Authority and the United States Environmental Protection Agency have also outlined guidelines to reduce these risks, thereby allowing the safe harnessing of the benefits offered by AgNPs without compromising safety (Ahmad et al., 2024; EFSA Scientific Committee et al., 2018). In summary, the varied mechanisms through which AgNPs act and the high efficacy combined with probable synergism place them among those forces that are winning the battle against MDR pathogens. Potential concerns related to toxicity and environmental impact would be fully addressed before such capabilities find their way into clinical and food safety applications.

3. Advanced green synthesis techniques for silver nanoparticles: Sustainable innovations

Green synthesis techniques for silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are gaining prominence due to their eco-friendly approach, reliance on renewable resources, and potential for large-scale production. Thus, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are currently being synthesized through green synthesis techniques, which are well accepted today as more environmentally friendly, renewable material-based, and feasible for mass-scale production (Fahim et al., 2024; Kiani et al., 2023; Nqakala et al., 2021). Approaches in the biological resources include marine algae, agricultural byproducts, and microbial systems to facilitate the reduction of silver ions into nanoparticles with minimal involvement of hazardous chemicals conventionally used in the fabrication of nanoparticles. Developments in the synthesis of plant-based and enzymatic methods offer new avenues for increasing efficiency, scalability, and environmental sustainability (Akhter et al., 2024; Abasi et al., 2022). Marine algae, both microalgae, and macroalgae, are emerging as potent bioresources for AgNP synthesis due to the abundance of bioactive compounds such as polysaccharides, phenols, and proteins that can act as natural reducing and stabilizing agents (Palanisamy et al., 2024). The synthesized AgNPs from various algae sources, including the Laurencia papillosa and Sargassum myriocystum, possess exceptional antimicrobial activities against human pathogens like foodborne pathogens, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. Such nanoscale metal particles are synthesized with low environmental hazards since they utilize the inherent reducing properties of algae while minimizing the toxic byproducts (Shanmugam et al., 2014). Marine algae also contribute to the economic feasibility, as these are ubiquitous, thus reducing the cost of feedstocks and less processing involved (Mukherjee et al., 2021). Agricultural waste that consists of fruit peels, husks, and crop residues, is an even greener alternative for nanoparticle preparation. These materials contain phytochemicals such as flavonoids and terpenoids that contribute to the bio-reduction of the silver ions. For instance, banana peels and sugarcane bagasse-based AgNPs possess good stability and efficient antimicrobial action and are appropriate for food packaging and agriculture (Ghosh et al., 2017). Considering the principles of circular economy, the strategy of conversion of agricultural crop waste into useful nanomaterials reduces the pollution that would have otherwise been released from the environment and also decreases the carbon footprint associated with nanoparticle fabrication (Priyadarshini et al., 2023). Microbial synthesis has developed into a novel method wherein microbes associated with bacteria, fungi, and algae function as natural bioreactors for the production of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). These microorganisms secrete enzymes and metabolites that facilitate the reduction of silver ions, thereby allowing for precise control during the synthesis process. For example, Bacillus subtilis and Aspergillus niger have been genetically modified to produce uniform and remarkably stable nanoparticles, while microbial fermentation processes promote scalability (Bahrulolum et al., 2021). Algal-associated microbes have also been targeted for their unique metabolic pathway, enhancing the stability of nanoparticles and reducing the synthesis time (Hamida et al., 2022).

Enzymatic as well as plant-based synthesis have immensely enriched the domain. Biological system-derived enzymes provide very effective control over the sizes and shapes of nanoparticles, a very crucial aspect while trying to achieve maximum antimicrobial efficacy. The plant extracts neem, tea leaves, and moringa have been well established to be promising in producing AgNPs showing maximum biocompatibility together with an eco-friendlier nature (Vanlalveni et al., 2021). The methodologies presented are unnecessary for external stabilizing agents and follow the principles of green chemistry by using renewable resources (as shown in Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(A) Schematic representation of the mechanism biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles (B) Characterization and (C) Applications.

Recent advancements in biosynthesis have focused on genetically modified algae and microbial systems to enhance the scalability and efficiency of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) production. For instance, genetically engineered Desmochloris edaphica has been used to synthesize stable AgNPs with significant antimicrobial activity against pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus and Shigella flexneri (Hamida et al., 2024). Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly enhanced the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) by optimizing reaction parameters and improving scalability. For example, Bayesian optimization has been successfully applied to fine-tune synthesis variables, such as temperature, reagent concentrations, and reaction time, achieving highly efficient nanoparticle production with precise optical properties (Yoo et al., 2023). Additionally, AI-based interaction modeling has enabled the identification of phytoconstituents crucial for AgNP formation, enhancing the reproducibility and stability of the biosynthesis process (Naghizadeh et al., 2021). These advancements not only streamline the production process but also facilitate large-scale applications, making AgNP synthesis more cost-effective and sustainable. Additional advancements include hybrid approaches that bio-chemical routes combine to achieve the greatest efficiency and functionality. For instance, the merger synthesis using algae and microwave-assisted methods accelerates production without compromising environmental sustainability (Khan et al., 2022; Tarannum et al., 2019; Torabfam & Yüce, 2020). Microbe/plant-based bioengineering systems with genetically engineered modification may also enhance the yield and reproducibility of the nanoparticles. Advanced green synthesis techniques are applied toward overcoming critical challenges relating to scalability, environmental impact, and cost-effectiveness. Marine algae and agricultural wastes are readily available and relatively inexpensive resources. On the other hand, accuracy and reproducibility are achieved through microbial and enzymatic methods. Such technologies can be added with nanofabrication and real-time monitoring systems that will make AgNPs more relevant for controlling foodborne pathogens as well as other crucial fields. This type of sustainable innovations taken by the industries can connect with the global sustainability goals by exploiting their unique characteristics in AgNPs for various purposes in food safety, agriculture, and biomedicine. The significant attention given to innovative methods of green synthesis places AgNPs at the very center of sustainable nanotechnology, which could be applied to nearly any field and simultaneously mitigates critical environmental and economic problems. Further, Table 1 mentions the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using different microorganisms (Bruna et al., 2021).

Table 1.

. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using different microorganisms.

Microorganism Key Findings Mechanism Particle Size Morphology Reference
E. coli Produced AgNPs in periplasmic space under anaerobic conditions Biological reduction of Ag + ions, role of c-type cytochromes 20.8 nm The zero-valent metallic silver lattice (Solís-Sandí et al., 2023)
Rhodococcus sp. Synthesis of AgNPs by reducing silver nitrate Cell enzyme systems may participate in the synthesis 20–50 nm Spherical (John et al., 2022)
Aspergillus tubingensis Fungal production of stable silver hydrosol Enzymatic reduction of metal ions 35 ± 10 nm Stabilized by proteins secreted by the fungus (Fonseca et al., 2022)
Cinnamomum camphora leaf Fabrication of AgNPs at ambient temperature Reduction of silver ions or chloroaurate ions, protective biomolecules 19.57 nm Triangular or spherical (Li et al., 2021)
Mango peel extract Synthesis from aqueous silver nitrate using Mango peel extract Biochemical mechanism involving FTIR 2.5–6.5 nm Crystalline, face-centered cubic symmetry (Cheng et al., 2021)
Bjerkandera sp. R1 Intracellular reduction of Ag + ions by fungus biomass Reduction by enzymes in the cell wall membrane 10–100 nm Formed below the cell wall surface (Osorio-Echavarría et al., 2021)
Plectonema boryanum UTEX 485 Cyanobacterium reacted with AgNO3 Metabolic processes and organics from dead cyanobacteria Up to 200 nm Spherical and octahedral (Behera et al., 2024)
Pelargonium x hortorum Rapid reduction of silver ions leading to AgNPs Faster than fungal methods, possibly enzyme-mediated 16 to 40 nm Assembled into quasilinear superstructures (Behera et al., 2024)
Syzygium cumini fruit extract Synthesis and anti-cancer activities of AgNPs Flavonoids are responsible for the reduction and stabilization 10–15 nm Not specified (Mittal et al., 2014)
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Biosynthesis of SNPs by unicellular algae Cellular oxidoreductase proteins control 5 ± 1 to 35 ± 5 nm Not specified (Shahriari Ahmadi et al., 2016)
Penicillium verrucosum Biosynthesis of AgNPs with antifungal activity Reaction with AgNO3 10–12 nm Polydisperse (Yassin et al., 2021)
Aspergillus sydowii Green synthesis of AgNPs Reduction of Ag + ion, enzyme-mediated extracellular reaction 24 nm Spherical, polydispersed (Wang et al., 2021)
Aspergillus flavus F5 Synthesis of spherical metallic AgNPs Extracellular synthesis process 12.5 nm Spherical (Fouda & Awad, 2022)
Aspergillus terreus Extracellular synthesis of AgNPs Probable extracellular synthesis mechanism 7–23 nm Spherical (Lotfy et al., 2021)
Solanum tuberosum peel aqueous extract. The functional group capped AgNPs Green biosynthetic method 3.91 to 27.07 nm Crystalline silver, amorphous iron (Xu et al., 2023)
Garcinia mangostana leaf extract Eco-friendly synthesis of AgNPs Reduction by leaf extract 35 nm Not specified (Karthiga, 2018)

4. Antagonistic activity of silver nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens

The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) foodborne pathogens, such as Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes, has necessitated the exploration of alternative antimicrobial strategies. One such alternative that attracted much interest due to its aggressive antagonism toward these pathogens is silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). What is unique in the antimicrobial performance of AgNPs is empirical data, synergistic use together with antibiotics, and potential integration into food safety policies. Silver nanoparticles display high antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms (Anees Ahmad et al., 2020; Caniça et al., 2019; Maniah et al., 2024). Gram-negative bacteria including E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa show increased susceptibility to AgNPs due to their relatively thinner peptidoglycan layer and less strengthened cell wall structure. However, studies point out that AgNPs synthesized via advanced biogenic routes could effectively transcend the structural barriers of Gram-positive pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus (Radzig et al., 2013). AgNPs prepared from the use of Sargassum vulgare exhibited inhibition zones of 23 and 38 mm against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and E. coli at a 100 μL concentration that outmatches ordinary antibiotics in similar studies (Hamouda & Aljohani, 2024). AgNPs have recently been discovered to be mixed with conventional antibiotics that let them produce advanced therapy. Higher antibacterial efficiency has been demonstrated through the conjugation of these with ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin, significantly lowering the MIC levels to inhibit MDR pathogens (Muddassir et al., 2022). Recent advancements highlight the ability of AgNPs to disrupt biofilm-forming cells effectively, with minimal biofilm eradication concentrations (MBEC) reported between 0.125 and 0.25 mg/mL. When combined with antibiotics, AgNPs further enhance biofilm disruption, demonstrating significant potential to combat biofilm-associated infections caused by MDR pathogens (Masadeh et al., 2024). For instance, AgNPs derived from the bacterium Pseudoduganella eburnea had its lowest MIC at 6.25 μg/mL against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 3.12 μg/mL against Staphylococcus aureus when conjugated with ciprofloxacin (Md. A. Huq, 2020). This synergistic approach increases bactericidal activity while offering the potential to reduce the doses to a minimum, thereby reducing side effects and slowing resistance development. The above technique of biosynthesis was discussed, but its relevance to performance in antimicrobial systems requires further elaboration. Hence, AgNPs synthesized using fungi exhibited high stability and homogeneity by which they have demonstrated increased antimicrobial activity. Reports state that Fusarium oxysporum-derived AgNPs were found to have strong inhibitory activity against Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica with inhibition zones over 20 mm at lower concentrations (Ilahi et al., 2022).

Methods of synthesis through algae are recently in vogue as these methods can prepare nanoparticles with controlled size and have high antibacterial potency. The studies reported 22 mm of antibacterial activities for E. coli and 20 mm of Bacillus cereus for AgNPs prepared from Oscillatoria limnetica cyanobacteria (Hamouda et al., 2019a). Interestingly, with AgNPs, along with antibiotics, the inhibition zone was enlarged to 26 mm and established the possibility of integrated approaches (Thomas & Nair, 2014). Besides promising in vitro efficacy, applications of AgNPs in food safety have indeed been very exciting. The coatings and packaging material embedded with AgNPs have successfully prevented microbial contamination in perishable foods whose shelf-life has been extended up to 50 %. Incorporation of AgNPs into sanitizing systems for food processing surfaces has been effective in reducing the burden of bacteria and biofilm formation in particular against species of Salmonella and Campylobacter (Istiqola & Syafiuddin, 2020; Sharma et al., 2023). Additionally, green synthesis techniques, such as lignin-capped AgNPs, provide an eco-friendly alternative for producing nanoparticles with high efficacy against MDR bacteria while maintaining low cytotoxicity. These nanoparticles have shown success in in vivo infection models, suggesting their viability for integration into food safety and healthcare applications (Pletzer et al., 2021). However, there are several challenges that the AgNPs pose in terms of real-world application. For example, the toxicity of these nanoparticles, persistence in the environment, and regulatory compliance need to be addressed immediately. Advances in encapsulation technologies and biopolymer coatings are explored as part of the way forward in addressing these challenges. For example, reduced cytotoxicity combined with retained antimicrobial activity has been documented in biodegradable composites of AgNPs, opening wide a route toward sustainable usage in food systems (Pandey et al., 2020). Silver nanoparticles pose a plausible solution to the ever-increasing MDR threat posed by the growing foodborne pathogens, most particularly those synthesized via biogenic pathways (as shown in Table 2). AgNPs provide wide protection against antibiotic resistance due to their strong antimicrobial activity and synergy with antibiotics but will require additional studies to determine their long-term safety and environmental impact before applying them on a large scale. Advances in encapsulation technologies using biodegradable materials have further reduced the cytotoxicity of AgNPs while preserving their antimicrobial effectiveness, paving the way for safer and more sustainable large-scale applications (Yadav & Tare, 2024).

Table 2.

. Antagonistic activity of biogenic silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) against foodborne pathogens.

Species Name Types Antagonistic Activity Observation Reference
E. coli Bacteria Corynebacterium diphtheriae Silver nanoparticles coated with antibiotics show improved inhibition zones. (Lee et al., 2019)
Thermophilic Bacillus species Bacteria Salmonella typhi E. coli Zone of inhibition: 22 mm. (Deljou & Goudarzi, 2016)
Pseudoduganella eburnea MAHUQ-39 Bacteria S. aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa MICs: 3.12 μg/mL (S. aureus) and 12.5 μg/mL (P. aeruginosa); MBCs: 6.25 μg/mL and 25 μg/mL. (M.A.Huq, 2020)
Chlorella vulgaris Algae S. aureus Inhibition was observed at 50 μg/mL. (Soleimani & Habibi-Pirkoohi, 2017)
Sargassum wightii Algae S. aureus, Bacillus rhizoids, E. coli, P.aeruginosa Inhibition zone: 8–15 mm, varying with concentration (20–50 μL). (Rajivgandhi et al., 2021)
Sargassum polycystum Algae P.aeruginosa, E.coli, S.aureus Zone of inhibition: 23 mm. (Mandal et al., 2023)
Turbinaria conoides Algae S. liquefaciens, Aeromonas hydrophila Inhibition zone: 32 mm at 100 μL. (Oktaviani et al., 2019)
Oscillatoria limnetica Algae E. coli B.cereus Inhibition zone: 38 mm at 100 μL. (Hamouda et al., 2019b)
Rice Starch Biomolecule S. aureus Streptococcus mutans MIC: 5.7 × 10−12 mol/L. (Abbaszadegan et al., 2015)
Ficus benghalensis Plant Dental pathogens Inhibition zones: 15 mm (S. mutans) and 18 mm (L. acidophilus) at 250 μg. (Manikandan et al., 2017)
Lysiloma acapulcensis Plant S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa. Antibacterial activity observed. (Garibo et al., 2020)
Phyllanthus emblica Plant Acidovorax oryzae Inhibition zones: 18 mm (E. coli), 16 mm (S. aureus), and 15 mm (P. aeruginosa). (Khan et al., 2013)
Phyla dulcis Plant Salmonella typhimurium, E. coli, S. aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes Inhibition: 10–12 mm zone. (McMurray et al., 2020)
Cucumis prophetarum Plant S. aureus, S. typhi Inhibition observed against S. typhi. (Hemlata, 2020)
Glycyrrhiza Glabra Amphipterygium adstringens Plant Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans At 1 mM: 78 % fungal growth inhibition (AgNPs). (Rodríguez-Luis et al., 2016)
Pu-erh tea leaf extract Plant Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae MIC for AgNPs: 3.9–7.8 μg/mL. (Loo et al., 2018a)
Murraya koenigii leaves Plant S. aureus
E. coli
MIC: 32 μg/mL (MRSA/MSSA), 32–64 μg/mL (ESβL-E. coli). (Qais et al., 2019)
Caltropis procera Plant Vibrio cholerae
E. coli
Ag-NPs and ZnO-NPs show antibacterial activity. (Salem et al., 2015)
Eriobotrya japonica leaf extract Plant E. coli,
S.aureus
AgNPs show stronger antibacterial effects against S. aureus. (Vanlalveni et al., 2021)
Fusarium scirpi Fungi Escherichia coli MIC: 25 mg/mL against planktonic UPEC cells. (Rodríguez-Serrano et al., 2020)
Penicillium polonicum Fungi Acinetobacter baumanii Inhibition zone: 21.2 ± 0.4 mm. (Neethu et al., 2018)
Aspergillus terreus Paecilomyces lilacinus Fusarium sp. Fungi S. aureus,
S. enterica
and Streptococcus pyogenes
Inhibition zones: 14–20 mm. (Choi & Ahsan, 2022)
Fusarium acuminatum Fungi S. aureus,
S. typhi,
S. epidermidis and
E. coli
Inhibition zones are higher than antibiotics, showing superior antimicrobial activity. (Durán et al., 2016)
Penicillium notatum Fungi E. coli,
Salmonella typhimurium and Enterobacter aerogenes
Clear distinction in antimicrobial effectiveness between AgNPs from P. funiculosum GS2 and A. solani GS1, based on inhibition zone. (Singh et al., 2014)
Aspergillus niger and aspergillus terrus Fungi S. aureus and E. coli MRSA showed a significant zone of inhibition (20 mm) with AgNPs, while MRSE showed a slightly smaller inhibition zone (19 mm). (Barakat & Gohar, 2012; Nanda & Saravanan, 2009)

5. Comparative analysis of silver nanoparticles and traditional antimicrobials in food and agriculture

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are increasingly gaining recognition as a highly effective alternative to traditional antimicrobial agents, such as antibiotics and biopesticides, within the food and agricultural systems. They have broad-spectrum activities, multiple mechanisms of action, and a low propensity for resistance development. Mechanisms of action for AgNPs are different from traditional therapies since they do not, like antibiotics targeting particular biochemical pathways, exhibit several mechanisms of antimicrobial activity, including alterations in membrane integrity, ROS generation, and interference with DNA. This makes them especially effective against MDR pathogens. For instance, AgNPs have been shown to have even higher efficacy in the reduction of Escherichia coli and Salmonella on produce by up to 99.9 %, surpassing chlorine-based disinfectants used in conventional food processing (Loo et al., 2018b). Similarly, AgNP-based coatings in aquaculture demonstrated even greater efficacy than antibiotics in controlling biofilm-forming bacteria such as Vibrio spp., improving survival rates in shrimp farms (Elayaraja et al., 2021). AgNPs exhibit synergistic effects when combined with traditional antimicrobial agents. A recent study demonstrated that AgNPs reduced bacterial contamination in food products by 85 % while extending shelf life by up to 30 % (Zorraquín-Peña et al., 2020). Moreover, the combination of AgNPs with conventional antibiotics has shown synergistic effects, enhancing antimicrobial efficacy by up to 70 % in laboratory settings (Alotaibi et al., 2022). These findings underscore their potential as a tool for addressing AMR in foodborne pathogens. It was reported that the blend of AgNPs with antibiotics, including tetracycline and ciprofloxacin yielded a significant decrease in bacterial resistance along with increased overall effectiveness of antimicrobial activity (Ipe et al., 2020). Further, the combination of AgNPs with hydrogen peroxide has also been effective compared to the treatment obtained individually with MDR pathogens (Ipe et al., 2020). Although biopesticides and antibiotics are typically associated with problems about persistence in the environment, green synthesized AgNPs are more biodegradable and environmentally friendly. The agricultural applications of AgNPs, including pesticides made from agricultural biomass have been found to have lesser environmental toxicity than chemical pesticides (Wolny-Koładka et al., 2022). Further, Fig. 3 illustrates a comparative representation of the antibiotic resistance mechanism and silver nanoparticle antimicrobial action mechanism modified and adapted from (Bruna et al., 2021; Shaikh et al., 2019).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparative representation of antibiotic resistance mechanism and silver nanoparticle antimicrobial action mechanism.

The cost-benefit analysis has shown that the greater initial production costs of AgNPs are more than the conventional antimicrobials, but long-term efficacy and reduced application frequencies make it economic in the long term. For example, AgNP-based coatings provide longer-lasting properties that give protection against antibiotics or pesticides, thus reducing the need for frequent reapplications (Zhou et al., 2017). Perhaps most importantly, the use of agricultural by-products in green synthesis methods has reduced the production cost by up to 30 % (Saratale et al., 2018). This enhances scalability and availability for various applications. There are still obstacles. Risks of toxicities of Ag ions to non-target species, coupled with the danger of adaptive microbial response to the abuse of AgNPs, thus demand careful attention. The regulatory framework assessing silver migration into food and environment needs further clarification for safety (Zhou et al., 2017). Despite these limitations, AgNPs are considered to be a sustainable alternative that holds vast potential for supplementing or replacing traditional antimicrobials in combating pathogens causing foodborne and agricultural diseases. Adoption of AgNPs would necessitate further research, especially into optimizing green synthesis while improving cost efficiency and developing sound regulation regimes. It would then be able to unlock the real potential of AgNPs as the foundation stone of antimicrobial strategies in food and agriculture.

6. Environmental and ecotoxicological impacts of silver nanoparticles in agriculture and ecosystems

With the rapid growth in the application of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in agricultural applications and food chains, the environmental concerns are immense mainly about the ecotoxicological impacts of these particles on soil, aquatic ecosystems, and microbial communities as mentioned in Table 3 (McGillicuddy et al., 2017). AgNPs have significant antimicrobial properties but unprecedented effects such as interference in nutrient cycling patterns and accumulation through food webs require extensive research studies. AgNPs, which are added to agricultural soils in the form of fertilizers, pesticides, or biosolids, can potentially disrupt critical microbial ecosystems involved in nutrient cycling. Exposure to AgNPs has been implicated in reducing both soil microbial diversity and enzymatic activity, with long-term implications for soil fertility and ecosystem imbalances; exposure to AgNPs has also been implicated in inhibiting the key soil bacteria Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter, which play significant roles in nitrogen fixation and nitrification (McGee, 2020). Results in this study indicate that soil systems are susceptible to contamination by nanoparticles. Agricultural runoff disperses AgNPs into the water ecosystem, thus posing a significant risk to aquatic ecosystems. Once dispersed into the aquatic ecosystem, it can dissolve into ionic silver, Ag+, which has a highly toxic effect on aquatic life. It has been reported that the AgNPs interfere with the respiration and reproductive activities of Daphnia magna and zebrafish (McGee, 2020). Moreover, their propensity to circumvent filtration mechanisms at wastewater treatment plants increases contamination further down the pipeline, hence impacting larger ecological systems (Guo et al., 2019).

Table 3.

. Environmental and ecotoxicological impacts of silver nanoparticles in agriculture and ecosystems.

Category Impact/Observation Key Examples Quantitative Data Mitigation Strategies
Soil Ecosystems Reduction in microbial diversity and nutrient cycling disruption AgNPs inhibited nitrifying bacteria (Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter). 25 % reduction in soil nitrification rates after 30 days of exposure (Zhang et al., 2021) Develop slow-release formulations and bio-inert coatings.
Aquatic Systems Toxicity to aquatic organisms (Daphnia magna, zebrafish) Exposure caused respiratory and reproductive impairments. 70 % reduction in reproductive success in Daphnia at 0.01 mg/L AgNP exposure (Park et al., 2021) Use advanced nanoparticle filtration systems in wastewater treatment.
Runoff and Sediment Contamination Increased silver concentrations in runoff and sediments Paddy fields treated with AgNP fertilizers showed downstream contamination. 1.5 ppm silver was detected in runoff water (Park et al., 2021) Establish buffer zones around treated areas to limit runoff.
Bioaccumulation in Plants Accumulation of AgNPs in edible plant tissues Silver residues are found in lettuce and wheat grown with AgNP fertilizers. 0.25 mg/kg silver in lettuce leaves (safe limit: 0.1 mg/kg) (Waalewijn-Kool et al., 2014) Minimize AgNP use in direct fertilizers; implement foliar application.
Food Chain Transfer Bioaccumulation in trophic levels Detected in aquatic macrophytes, transferring to higher organisms. Silver content increased 3-fold in fish exposed to contaminated macrophytes (Palácio et al., 2020) Promote green synthesis methods to reduce ecotoxicity.
Toxicity in Sediments Persistent toxicity affecting benthic organisms Long-term sediment exposure led to mortality in soil arthropods (Folsomia candida). 30 % increase in mortality rates after 28 days (Waalewijn-Kool et al., 2014) Deploy AgNP encapsulation technologies to minimize exposure.
Wastewater Impact Ineffectiveness of conventional wastewater treatment methods AgNPs bypassed filtration systems, contaminating downstream ecosystems. 35 % of AgNPs detected in downstream water (Waalewijn-Kool et al., 2014) Develop AgNP-specific filtration and recovery systems.
Algal Growth Suppression Reduced primary productivity in contaminated water bodies Exposure affected algal photosynthesis and biomass accumulation. 40 % decrease in algal productivity at 0.05 mg/L AgNP exposure (Bakir et al., 2024) Adopt eco-friendly production methods to reduce toxicity.

The other critical point is the bioaccumulation of AgNPs in plants and animals. AgNPs are expected to be absorbed into crop tissues via the application routes of fertilizers or foliar sprays and thereby ingested through edible parts, thus posing risks of human exposure through the food chain (Li et al., 2017). Studies on lettuce and wheat exposed to AgNP-enriched fertilizers revealed significant residues of silver in the crops, which consequently raised concern over the chronic exposure potential from these for human health (Wu et al., 2020). Case studies highlight the environmental persistence of AgNPs. For example, it has been reported that sewage sludge applied in agricultural settings can alter microbial communities and decrease enzymatic activity in soils. Furthermore, AgNP-enriched fertilizers used in the cultivation of rice paddies generated runoff, causing an increase in silver concentration in the targeted nearby water bodies with impacts on algal and invertebrate populations (Ottoni et al., 2020). Hence, sustainable strategies are inevitable in addressing these environmental risks. Green synthesis methods using either plants or microbes preclude the interference of reactive byproducts, minimizing inherent AgNP toxicity. Further restrictions on the bioavailability of AgNPs in ecosystems include controlled release systems such as biodegradable polymers encapsulating AgNPs. In addition, stronger regulations will be required to control responsible application and appropriate wastewater management that will minimize dispersal into the environment. Though the merits of AgNPs for agro-control of pathogens cannot be avoided, they require sustainability in their environment. The utility will have to be weighed with environmental protection through interdisciplinary research with strict oversight for sustainability without compromising their ecological footprint.

7. Emerging application of biogenic silver nanoparticles in food and agriculture

7.1. Emerging applications of silver nanoparticles in food packaging to control foodborne pathogens

Silver nanoparticles or AgNPs have emerged as the newest ingenuity in food packaging due to the unprecedented antimicrobial properties in the preservation of foods by the extension of perishable products. Nanoparticles work by making holes in the microbial cell membrane and allowing the release of silver ions, which interfere with the cell structure and cellular metabolism and lead to the killing of pathogens (Carbone et al., 2016; Kumar et al., 2021). It has been proven that PLA films doped with AgNPs can decrease the micro populations of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli by more than 99 % after a 48-h duration (Duda-Chodak et al., 2023). In such a regard, the incorporation of AgNPs into polyethylene films also neutralizes Listeria monocytogenes and is considered one of the most significant risks involved in ready-to-eat food products (Markowska et al., 2018). Some recent examples of innovations in AgNP-based food packaging include biodegradable films such as bacterial cellulose films combined with PVA films that can, together with extended antimicrobial activity, achieve environmental sustainability (Dairi et al., 2019). According to Begum et al. (2022), multilayered films with natural additives, such as essential oils or plant extracts, can hybridize silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and achieve synergism in the fight against bacterial and fungal pathogens (Begum et al., 2022). Multi-layered films that embed AgNPs in their outer layers offer antimicrobial efficacy in targeted manners while inhibiting the migration of silver to food products; therefore, safe and effective (Kostic et al., 2019). Although AgNPs have been considered more potential to be applied in food packaging, their safety, regulatory approval, and environmental sustainability are still very crucial challenges. Studies on migration into foods show that the release of silver ions is material dependent on the package, characteristics of food, and storage conditions, which still raises the toxicity concern. According to Istiqola & Syafiuddin, 2020, regulatory bodies, including the FDA and EFSA, have provided regulations to standardize testing on safety. Moreover, trust from the public concerning the use of nanotechnology for food necessitates labeling and education of the consumers to change their perception (He et al., 2019; Ranjan et al., 2019).

However, environmental issues remain predominant to some extent because silver ions from spent packaging may survive in ecosystems and interfere with microbial diversity and nutrient cycling. On the contrary, there exists a current interest in AgNPs prepared through green synthesis techniques using plant-based precursors obtained from agricultural wastes; hence they are economically as well as environmentally friendly (Rodríguez-Félix et al., 2022). Future innovation breakthroughs will be achieved on the redetermination of strategies for food safety in terms of smart packaging with AgNPs and biosensors that can sense pathogens in real-time and hybrid nanocomposites with multifunctional properties. The best harvest of AgNPs to successfully control foodborne pathogen incidence necessitates greater-order interdisciplinarity collaboration between material scientists, microbiologists, and regulatory agencies. AgNP-based food packaging is one of the frontiers of technology for food safety, and it presents a sustainable solution for the effective mitigation of foodborne infections. The technology should, therefore advance toward wider applications by overcoming barriers associated with regulatory, safety, and environmental concerns through continued research and innovations.

7.2. Emerging applications of silver nanoparticles in food processing to control foodborne pathogens

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have gained significant application in food processing because of their intrinsic antimicrobial properties, which may be required when handling food-borne pathogens and ensuring food safety. Their use in developing biosensors and antimicrobial coatings has transformed food processing because it reduces microbial loading on various surfaces and allows for real-time monitoring of pathogens. These developments are significant in controlling recurrent outbreaks by pathogens such as Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes commonly contaminating foods at various points in processing and handling. AgNP-based antimicrobial coatings on food contact surfaces prevent the development of biofilms, which is the biggest challenge in the food-processing environment. The biofilms formed from the presence of bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes have been proven to be resistant to conventional cleaning and result in pervasive contamination. It is known that the coating of AgNPs inhibits the development of biofilms by preventing adhesion and cellular structure formations. Rivera-Mendoza also found that incorporating AgNPs into the surfaces of processing equipment in poultry processing controlled Campylobacter jejuni, a common foodborne illness agent at greater than 90 % bacterial load reduction (Rivera-Mendoza et al., 2024a). Similarly, the long-term hygiene feature of coatings on equipment for the processing of meat and seafood stainless steel is provided with durable antimicrobial activity. Besides coating, AgNPs are an integral part of developing advanced biosensors for early detection of foodborne pathogens. The properties of optics and electronics of AgNPs enhance the sensitivity and specificity of these biosensors, which allows real-time analysis at a low concentration. For instance, AgNP-enhanced biosensors were designed to detect bacterial endotoxins as well as toxins from E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus in just a few minutes; faster and more reliable options can be suggested than conventional culture-based techniques (Sondhi et al., 2024). Generally, they utilize AgNPs as signal amplifiers in surface plasmon resonance or electrochemical detection systems, which, in turn, present robust tools for food safety monitoring.

Although promising, there are several challenges to incorporating these into the food processing chain. One major challenge includes the possibility of developing microbial resistance to silver ions over time, which would therefore limit their effectiveness long term (Li & Xu, 2024). Coatings with AgNPs provide extended antimicrobial effects, and studies to date are ambiguous about how they behave if exposed repeatedly to consecutive cycles of cleaning treatments and high temperatures combined with harsh abrasiveness typically found in the food processing environment (Kumar et al., 2021). Regulating is still an issue since the acceptance of AgNP-coated equipment often calls for detailed studies on nanoparticle migration into food products and the health risks associated. Environmental issues due to the large-scale application of AgNPs also need to be focused upon. The aggregation of AgNPs from food processing waste can contaminate water and soil ecosystems, thereby disturbing microbial diversity and ecological balance. To mitigate these harmful impacts, researchers are currently exploring eco-friendly synthesis methods and recyclable AgNP coatings to minimize the impact on the environment (Manikandan et al., 2023). Future applications of AgNPs in food processing are designed for multifunctional coatings and biosensors that may integrate antimicrobial properties, self-cleaning functions, and sensitive pathogen detection. Some of the research has dealt with innovations such as smart surfaces of AgNPs-modified surfaces that can sense contamination by releasing only the antimicrobial agents when the contamination is sensed. Furthermore, strong interschool collaboration from microbiologists, materials scientists, and regulatory agencies will be paramount in surmounting such challenges regarding the safe and efficient use of AgNPs in food processing. Silver nanoparticles have great potential and are most likely to transform food processing through effective pathogen control and subsequent food safety. Their applications on antimicrobial coatings and advanced biosensors are the most strategic tools that can make possible the reduction of contaminant risks in food production environments. In the meantime, more research and studies must be conducted to overcome the resistance, safety, and environmental sustainability issues that hinder its wide-scale adoption (Jasni et al., 2021; Siritongsuk et al., 2022).

7.3. Emerging applications of silver nanoparticles in agriculture to control foodborne pathogens

There is growing recognition that silver nanoparticles have the potential to become a new agricultural crop yield enhancer and foodborne pathogen controller. The two major nanofertilizers include antimicrobial agents that prevent microbial infections in crops and nanofertilizers that improve plant growth, facilitating nutrient uptake. These innovations are consistent with sustainable agricultural methods because they reduce chemical pesticides and fertilizers, hence improving food safety and reducing risks of contamination (Khan et al., 2023a). AgNP-based nano-fertilizers possess great potential to optimize nutrient delivery and plant growth. The nano-level size allows nanoparticles to penetrate deeper into plant tissues and root systems, thus promoting improved nutrient uptake (Mittal et al., 2020). Silver nano-fertilizers increased the uptake of nitrogen and photosynthesis efficiency of crops like wheat and maize and thus significantly impacted yield production (Khan et al., 2023b). AgNPs also have antimicrobial activity that protects plants from pathogenic pathogens that cause root diseases and promote growth in plants. Nano-fertilizers obviate the drawbacks of nutrient leaching and runoff, which are commonly associated with traditional fertilizers, to provide nutrients in a slow-release and controlled mechanism to avoid environmental pollution and maximize the utilization of available resources (Wahab et al., 2024). This two-pronged benefit from AgNPs makes them an excellent innovation for regions plagued by the issues of soil degradation and scarcity of water. In fact, very critically important to crop protection against bacterial and fungal pathogens is the antimicrobial properties of AgNPs. AgNPs degrade the microbial cell membranes and metabolic processes and effectively inhibit the growth of pathogens such as Pseudomonas syringae, Xanthomonas campestris, and Fusarium oxysporum, which cause sizeable agricultural losses (Trzcińska-Wencel et al., 2023). The sprays of AgNP on the leaves and fruits of plants are seen to create a protective barrier, reduce microbial colonization, and prolong shelf life (Noga et al., 2023). For example, Khorasani et al., 2022 demonstrated that saffron tepal-reduced AgNPs were used for the management of bacterial blight in rice. AgNPs are also applied as seed and soil treatments to avoid contamination by pathogens before harvesting, which may lead to foodborne diseases in later stages (Khorasani et al., 2022). Silver nanoparticle coatings on seeds ensure germination without pathogens. Amendments of the soil with AgNPs also inhibit soil-borne harmful micro-organisms. However, great care should be taken to avoid interference with the soil microorganisms used in nutrient cycling and overall soil health (Kim et al., 2024). Fig. 4 depicts various routes leading to the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Pérez-Rodríguez & Mercanoglu Taban, 2019; Schrijver et al., 2018; Silva et al., 2023).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Various Route Leading to the Spread of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria taken from (Silva et al., 2023).

Besides their application toward preventing the deterioration of crops, AgNPs are used as post-harvest treatment aimed to reduce the contamination burden and rot. Applied at the time of harvesting, the AgNPs-based coating limits the growth of pathogens on these products during the storage and transport phases, thus reducing post-harvest losses (Yan & Chen, 2019). For instance, it has been reported that the treated tomatoes and cucumbers with AgNPs maintained good quality and greatly reduced loads of microorganisms over extended periods of storage (Begum et al., 2022). Despite this, there are several issues related to the massive application of AgNPs in agriculture. One of the major concerns is the ecotoxic impact of silver nanoparticles, especially in soils and water bodies. However, AgNPs tend to accumulate in the environment and will affect the nontarget organism populations, including beneficial soil microbe populations and aquatic life. Khorasani et al., 2022 have thus emphasized the need for controlled application methods and rigorous environmental impact assessments (Khorasani et al., 2022). Another emerging concern is the problem of microbial resistance to silver that will be developed, which may further reduce the long-term efficacy of AgNPs as antimicrobial agents (McNeilly et al., 2021). Furthermore, the presence of regulatory barriers and the substantial expenses associated with the production of nanoparticles constrain their availability to smallholder farmers, who constitute a critical component of the agricultural sector in numerous developing nations. The prospective role of AgNPs in agriculture depends on the advancement of sustainable and economically viable synthesis methods that leverage renewable resources, including plant extracts or agricultural by-products. Techniques for green synthesis not only lower production costs but also mitigate the environmental hazards linked to traditional chemical synthesis approaches (Ying et al., 2022). Functionalization with other kinds of nanomaterials, for example, zinc oxide or titanium dioxide, would be able to increase functionality while widening the spectrum of antimicrobial activity. Further improvement in application toward agriculture is research into smart delivery systems, controlled-release formulations, and nanocarriers (Aguda & Lateef, 2022). Such an approach would ensure that the application was as fine-tuned as possible while at the same time minimizing harmful environmental impacts with maximum efficacy. Interdisciplinary collaboration by materials scientists, agronomists, and environmentalists can help in overcoming the challenges facing the field and ensure sustainable use of AgNP-based technologies in agriculture. Silver nanoparticles have so much potential to make the agricultural world deliver higher crop productivity and reduce microbial contamination at both pre-harvest and post-harvest levels. Their applications as nano-fertilizers and antimicrobial agents represent a step toward sustainable agriculture. However, high acceptance of AgNPs requires overcoming questions related to environmental safety and financial issues along with assurance of acceptance. Critical research and innovations for AgNPs in agricultural practice and enlightening their contribution to global food security should take place.

7.4. Silver nanoparticles in livestock feed for reducing gastrointestinal pathogens

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are emerging as a novel additive in livestock feed, offering significant potential to reduce gastrointestinal pathogens, enhance gut health, and improve overall livestock productivity. Due to their broad antimicrobial action, AgNPs significantly inhibit pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Clostridium perfringens, with minimal harm to the beneficial intestinal microbiota. This selective action is through mechanisms of disruption of bacterial cell walls, enzymatic activity inhibition, and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), making them an alternative effective replacement for conventional antibiotics that usually lead to resistance (De Silva et al., 2021). AgNPs have been added to animal diets, which exhibited several health benefits. Intestinal morphology was improved with increases in villus height, and increased nutrient absorption in broilers has been reported upon supplementation with AgNPs. These changes enhance feed conversion ratios and efficiency of gain, as demonstrated by an experiment in growing broiler chickens that realized significantly enhanced body weight and feed utilization in diets supplemented with AgNPs (El-Abd et al., 2022). Reduced loads of pathogens, including intestinal populations of E. coli and Salmonella, confirm the involvement of AgNPs in maintaining gut health and the beneficial microbiota (Campos et al., 2021). AgNPs economically deliver substantial benefits of reducing reliance on conventional antibiotics and loss of productivity associated with the disease.

Stability and shelf life with these materials offer stability and shelf life for which they become desirable in formulations for animal feed, especially in intensive agricultural practices. The relevant application of AgNPs also addresses the ever-rising global issue that has been drawing much attention concerning the problem of antimicrobial resistance which offers a sustainable approach toward the management of livestock health (Patra, 2019). The environmental impacts of AgNPs in animal feed must be considered in depth. Residual nanoparticles can have hazardous effects on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems due to their incidence in manure and agricultural runoff. In this context, green synthesis methods involving materials that are biocompatible and biodegradable are also being researched to ensure ecological safety (Dang et al., 2021; Ihtisham et al., 2021). The future use of AgNPs in animal nutrition is believed to depend on the optimization of doses and delivery mechanisms that maximize benefits and minimize risks. AgNPs with prebiotics or probiotics offer promising avenues to achieve synergy in gut health. Once the AgNPs are proven safe, and production becomes eco-friendly, it may play a transformative role by bringing about an improvement in livestock productivity along routes of reducing pathogenic loads and investment in sustainable farming practices.

8. Regulations for the use of silver nanoparticles in the food and agriculture industry

Existing guidelines for the fields of agriculture and food require adaptation or the development of new ones, given the expansive influence of nanotechnology. Nanotechnology is a multidisciplinary domain, drawing from biology, physics, chemistry, material science, medicine, and engineering. Its interdisciplinary nature holds immense potential for advancing products, technology, and scientific knowledge (Prasad et al., 2017). In agriculture, nanotechnology is being leveraged to create advanced insecticides, boost food crop yields, and enhance biocontrol methods against various infections that threaten agricultural output. This innovative approach heralds a new era characterized by increased effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and reduced environmental and human health risks. Its applications span multiple facets of agriculture and food-related domains, including the improvement of feed and food additives, the development of sophisticated food packaging solutions, the deployment of potent antimicrobial agents for animal infection control, and, notably, the exploration of alternative strategies to address the mounting challenge of multidrug resistance in human health, resulting from excessive antibiotic use in agriculture (Yadav et al., 2019).

In the European context, regulations have indirectly addressed the utilization of nanomaterials in various applications related to food and agriculture. Regulation No 178/2002 establishes laws and regulations concerning food and feed safety in European countries, encompassing food law and addressing aspects such as food storage, and safety throughout production, processing, and transport. Under this regulation, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) plays a crucial role in providing scientific counsel and managing food safety issues, particularly through the RASFF Rapid Alert system for feed and food (Amenta et al., 2015a).

The term ‘Nano Foods’ is defined under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 as novel foods, encompassing food products that incorporate nanomaterials or employ nanotechnology tools or processes across the entire food cycle, from cultivation to final consumer packaging. Any food containing engineered nanomaterials, materials with sizes of 100 nm or less displaying functional properties, or properties resembling nanomaterials, must be indicated in the ingredient list for final consumer consumption under Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 (Radley-Gardner et al., 2016).

Furthermore, Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 deals with food additives, including modifications involving nanotechnology, which necessitate rigorous safety assessments by EFSA before being approved for use as food additives. These regulations also apply to foods intended for children, special medical purposes, or dietary replacements for various health conditions under Regulation (EU) No 609/2013. Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 addresses the utilization of nanoparticles in contact materials that come into contact with food. It emphasizes toxicological assessments and safety evaluations concerning nanoparticle composition and concentration compared to other materials used in packaging (Radley-Gardner et al., 2016).

More recently, in August 2021, the European Food Safety Authority released guidelines related to the regulation of nanomaterials intended for use in food and feed. These guidelines outline parameters for nanoparticle characterization and risk assessment factors, including exposure and hazard identification, for human and animal consumption (Committee et al., 2021).

In the United States, the utilization of nanoparticles in diverse food and agricultural contexts is subject to regulation by the US FDA. The FDA has formulated directives outlining the incorporation of nanomaterials in the food sector and their influence on the safety and regulatory standing of food components, encompassing substances in contact with food. Moreover, supplementary guidance has been furnished under the heading ‘Evaluating the consequences of substantial modifications in manufacturing processes, encompassing emerging technologies, on the safety and regulatory status of food components and substances in contact with food, including those that function as color additives (Ferraris et al., 2021).

In other countries such as Japan, specific regulations on nanotechnology and nanomaterials in the food and agriculture sectors remain unclear. China's National Centre for Nanoscience and Technology and the Commission on Nanomaterial Standardization oversee nanomaterial use, but comprehensive limits and types of nanomaterials are not specified. Australia and New Zealand have established Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) as an independent organization to regulate nanomaterials as food ingredients and packaging materials (Amenta et al., 2015a).

A list of regulations proposed by different countries has been listed in Table 4. Despite the regulations in different countries, specifics regarding nanoparticles, especially silver nanoparticles, remain unclear. In some European countries, silver nanoparticles are used in packaging and food contact materials, with guidelines stipulating limits of less than 0.05 mg/l in water and 0.05 mg/kg in food products (Trotta et al., 2023).

Table 4.

. Regulations for the use of silver nanoparticles/nanomaterials in the food and agriculture industry.

Country/Region Regulatory Body Food Industry Regulations Agriculture Regulations Key Applications Notes Reference
United States FDA, EPA It requires safety assessments for food contact materials; nanosilver is allowed in antimicrobial packaging. Regulated under pesticide laws; nanosilver-based fertilizers require EPA approval. Food packaging, pest control Emphasis on environmental safety and human health. (Kumari et al., 2023)
European Union EFSA, ECHA Strict limits on nanoparticle size (<10 nm) and concentrations; mandates product labeling. Controlled under EU pesticide laws; approval is needed for specific uses. Pesticides, biodegradable coatings Focus on consumer safety and reducing environmental impact. (Nielsen et al., 2023; Singh et al., 2024)
Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Requires safety evaluations for novel food additives containing nanoparticles. Strict pre-approval for agricultural chemicals with nanosilver. Advanced nanotechnology research Strong emphasis on innovation and public safety. Peters et al., 2016)
China CFSA, Ministry of Agriculture Mandates detailed safety evaluations; growing interest in regulating nanosilver applications. Regulated under agricultural safety laws; environmental impact assessments are needed. Food storage, fertilizers Rapidly evolving regulations to meet international standards. (“China Notifies for Safety Evaluation Materials for “Three New Foods” [WWW Document, 2024)
Australia FSANZ, APVMA Requires pre-market approval for food products with nanomaterials. Nanosilver fertilizers are regulated as agricultural chemicals; safety data is required. Veterinary products, food coatings Strong focus on consumer and environmental protection. (“Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, 2010)

9. Commercial feasibility of silver nanoparticles for foodborne infection applications

The commercial feasibility of AgNPs in controlling foodborne infections is based on patent development, production scaling up, cost reduction, and the dismantling of obstacles to marketplace adoption. Innovation in the patent landscape is significant concerning green synthesis techniques involving biological reducing agents through plant-based synthesis agents, antimicrobial food packaging, and direct applications on the surface of food. For example, US10292538B2 details are friendly to the environment synthesis, while EP2917850A1 only suggests that the packaging films should be AgNP-based and, as such need to show inhibition of microbial growth to attain and extend shelf life (Lawal et al., 2024). Still, difficulties lie in scaling up to industrial-scale production; achieving homogeneity of size and shape is necessary and important for efficacy. Scaling production to industrial levels presents challenges, including maintaining uniformity in particle size and shape, which are critical for antimicrobial efficacy. Studies such as (Lisboa et al., 2024) highlight the importance of precise production controls to minimize variability, while innovations like biogenic synthesis using agricultural waste offer cost-effective and sustainable alternatives (Larrañaga-Tapia et al., 2024). However, mass production requires substantial capital expenditure using specific machinery and procedures (Gupta et al., 2024). Similarly, aerosol-based synthesis methods are promising for scale-up production with economies of cost due to their scalability feature (Fisher et al., 2023).

One of the factors considered in the production cost of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) is the high price of silver as the primary raw material. Efforts to alloy AgNPs with other alternative metals have been shown to have great potential for cost-saving (Singh et al., 2023). Energy-efficient and environment-friendly synthesis techniques have been investigated in an attempt to cut down the operational costs (Rosman et al., 2021). Realizing economies of scale via advanced production technologies is crucial for lowering per-unit expenses and enhancing the competitiveness of these materials within the marketplace. Notwithstanding these developments, numerous obstacles hinder extensive market integration. Regulatory hurdles continue to be considerable, with differing standards among nations prolonging the endorsement process for AgNP-based food safety solutions (Vidic et al., 2019). Furthermore, apprehensions related to toxicity and environmental repercussions require comprehensive safety evaluations (Cerqueira et al., 2018). Consumer acceptance is another problem where public awareness of the use of nanotechnology in food safety is still at the infant stage. With proper education and labeling, it can establish comprehension and faith among consumers (Mohanty et al., 2023). The future of AgNPs in the control of foodborne infection will only lie in continued innovation and concerted work between researchers, regulatory agencies, and industry stakeholders. Addressing the issues of scalability, sustainability, and safety, AgNPs are likely to emerge as a novel solution for improved food safety with very minimal microbial contamination. Researchers like Lisboa et al., 2024 and Rosman et al., 2021 allow such barriers to be reduced and for the full potential of this promising technology toward its full commercial development to be realized. Lastly Table 5 lists silver nanoparticle (AgNP)-based products and their applications in the antimicrobial control of food-borne pathogens.

Table 5.

. Overview of various silver nanoparticle (AgNP)-based products and their applications in antimicrobial control of food-borne pathogens.

Product/Brand Application Mechanism Manufacturer/Source Regulatory Status Target Microorganisms Reference/Source
NanoCid® Antimicrobial coating and sprays Bactericidal action on surfaces NanoCide Technologies Approved in some regions; under review elsewhere E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella (Zarei et al., 2014)
AgNP-based Biodegradable Films Food packaging for poultry and meats Inhibits microbial growth; biodegradable matrix Academic R&D collaboration Pre-commercial prototype Salmonella, Campylobacter jejuni (das Neves et al., 2023)
Green-Synthesized AgNPs Surface sprays against Salmonella Disruption of bacterial cell walls Biogenic Synthesis, Independent Labs In development Salmonella, E. coli, S. aureus (Losasso et al., 2014)
Essential Oil-AgNP Combinations Pathogen control in packaged food products Synergistic antibacterial and antifungal effects R&D Academic-Industry Partnerships Not yet commercialized Candida albicans, E. coli, Aspergillus (Begum et al., 2022)
Terminalia Catappa-derived AgNPs Combat biofilms in food industries Biofilm penetration and bacterial inhibition Terminalia Research Unit Under regulatory evaluation Listeria monocytogenes, biofilms (Devadiga et al., 2017)
Campylobacter-targeted AgNPs Antimicrobials in poultry processing Interference with bacterial metabolism Research Collaboration, Mexico Early-stage regulatory review Campylobacter jejuni (Rivera-Mendoza et al., 2024b)
Valorized AgNPs from Saffron Tepals Poultry product pathogen control Eco-friendly synthesis and strong bactericidal effect Academic Labs Pilot-scale testing E. coli, Salmonella, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Khorasani et al., 2022)

10. Conclusion

Silver nanoparticles have immense transformative potential in addressing foodborne infections and antimicrobial resistance, and it has versatile applications in food packaging, processing, agriculture, and livestock management. Its unique multi-targeting mechanism of antimicrobial action, broad-spectrum efficacy, and synergetic action with classical antibiotics make this a very powerful tool for the improvement of food safety. Furthermore, the sustainability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness of green synthesis routes of production have significantly improved AgNP production against global goals of sustainability. However, there are enough implications about the environmental and ecotoxicological impact of AgNPs, including their interference with soil and aquatic ecosystems and bioaccumulation in food chains, so systemic safety appraisal and proper legislative framework should be built. Interdisciplinary academic contributions between scientists, policymakers, and industry stakeholders could be used to better optimize AgNP applications, mitigate risks, and build consumer trust as regards the potential of AgNPs. This is possible through AgNPs as they bridge knowledge gaps and foster innovation, hence revolutionizing approaches to food safety as a sustainable and effective strategy for combating foodborne pathogens that would safeguard global health.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Himanshu Jangid: Writing – original draft. Harish Chandra Joshi: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Joydeep Dutta: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Akil Ahmad: Writing – original draft. Mohammed B. Alshammari: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Kaizar Hossain: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization. Gaurav Pant: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization. Gaurav Kumar: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

All authors are highly thankful to Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University. This study is supported via funding from Prince sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number (PSAU/2025/R/1446). The authors convey their sincere thanks to Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India, and Asutosh College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India for their support and encouragement.

Contributor Information

Kaizar Hossain, Email: kaizar.kaizar@gmail.com.

Gaurav Pant, Email: rgauravpant@gmail.com.

Gaurav Kumar, Email: gauravkr01@gmail.com.

Data availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

References

  1. Akhter M.S., Rahman M.A., Ripon R.K., Mubarak M., Akter M., Mahbub S.…Sikder M.T. A systematic review on green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plants extract and their bio-medical applications. Heliyon. 2024;10 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  2. Abasi F., Raja N.I., Mashwani Z.U.R., Amjad M.S., Ehsan M., Mustafa N.…Proćków J. Biogenic silver nanoparticles as a stress alleviator in plants: A mechanistic overview. Molecules. 2022;27:3378. doi: 10.3390/molecules27113378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abbaszadegan A., Ghahramani Y., Gholami A., Hemmateenejad B., Dorostkar S., Nabavizadeh M., Sharghi H. The effect of charge at the surface of silver nanoparticles on antimicrobial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative Bacteria: A preliminary study. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2015;2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/720654. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aguda O.N., Lateef A. Recent advances in functionalization of nanotextiles: A strategy to combat harmful microorganisms and emerging pathogens in the 21st century. Heliyon. 2022;8 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmad K., Li Y., Tu C., Guo Y., Yang X., Xia C., Hou H. Nanotechnology in food packaging with implications for sustainable outlook and safety concerns. Food Bioscience. 2024;58 doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.103625. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alotaibi A.M., Alsaleh N.B., Aljasham A.T., Tawfik E.A., Almutairi M.M., Assiri M.A.…Almutairi M.M. Silver nanoparticle-based combinations with antimicrobial agents against antimicrobial-resistant clinical isolates. Antibiotics. 2022;11:1219. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amenta V., Aschberger K., Arena M., Bouwmeester H., Botelho Moniz F., Brandhoff P.…Peters R.J. Regulatory aspects of nanotechnology in the Agri/feed/food sector in EU and non-EU countries. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. RTP. 2015;73:463–476. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Amenta V., Aschberger K., Arena M., Bouwmeester H., Botelho Moniz F., Brandhoff P.…Peters R.J. Regulatory aspects of nanotechnology in the Agri/feed/food sector in EU and non-EU countries. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2015;73:463–476. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Anees Ahmad S., Sachi Das S., Khatoon A., Tahir Ansari M., Afzal M., Saquib Hasnain M., Kumar Nayak A. Bactericidal activity of silver nanoparticles: A mechanistic review. Materials Science for Energy Technologies. 2020;3:756–769. doi: 10.1016/j.mset.2020.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority . SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: 2010. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bahrulolum H., Nooraei S., Javanshir N., Tarrahimofrad H., Mirbagheri V.S., Easton A.J., Ahmadian G. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using microorganisms and their application in the agrifood sector. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2021;19:86. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00834-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bakir M., Jiménez M.S., Laborda F., Slaveykova V.I. Exploring the impact of silver-based nanomaterial feed additives on green algae through single-cell techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;939 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Barakat K.M., Gohar Y.M. Antimicrobial agents produced by marine aspergillus terreus var. africanus against some virulent fish pathogens. Indian Journal of Microbiology. 2012;52:366–372. doi: 10.1007/s12088-012-0255-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Begum T., Follett P.A., Mahmud J., Moskovchenko L., Salmieri S., Allahdad Z., Lacroix M. Silver nanoparticles-essential oils combined treatments to enhance the antibacterial and antifungal properties against foodborne pathogens and spoilage microorganisms. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2022;164 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Behera M., Behera P.R., Sethi G., Pradhan B., Adarsh V., Alkilayh O.A.…Singh L. Cyanobacterial silver nanoparticles and their potential utility—Recent Progress and prospects: A review. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2024;64 doi: 10.1002/jobm.202400256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bruna T., Maldonado-Bravo F., Jara P., Caro N. Silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22:7202. doi: 10.3390/ijms22137202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Campos D., Goméz-García R., Oliveira D., Madureira A.R. Intake of nanoparticles and impact on gut microbiota: In vitro and animal models available for testing. Gut Microbiome. 2021;3 doi: 10.1017/gmb.2021.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Caniça M., Manageiro V., Abriouel H., Moran-Gilad J., Franz C.M.A.P. Antibiotic resistance in foodborne bacteria. Trends food Sci. Technol., keeping food safety on the agenda for 15 years. The SAFE consortium. 2019;84:41–44. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Carbone M., Donia D.T., Sabbatella G., Antiochia R. Silver nanoparticles in polymeric matrices for fresh food packaging. Journal of King Saud University, Science. 2016;28:273–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2016.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chandraker S.K., Kumar R. Biogenic biocompatible silver nanoparticles: A promising antibacterial agent. Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews. 2024;40:3113–3147. doi: 10.1080/02648725.2022.2106084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheng J., Lin X., Wu X., Liu Q., Wan S., Zhang Y. Preparation of a multifunctional silver nanoparticles polylactic acid food packaging film using mango peel extract. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2021;188:678–688. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. China Notifies for Safety Evaluation Materials for “Three New Foods” [WWW Document], 2024. Keller Heckman. URL https://www.khlaw.com/insights/china-notifies-requirements-safety-evaluation-materials-three-new-foods (accessed 11.28.24).
  23. Choi H.W., Ahsan S.M. Biocontrol activity of aspergillus terreus ANU-301 against two distinct plant diseases, tomato fusarium wilt and potato soft rot. Plant Pathology Journal. 2022;38:33–45. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.12.2021.0187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Committee E.S., More S., Bampidis V., Benford D., Bragard C., Halldorsson T.…Schoonjans R. Guidance on risk assessment of nanomaterials to be applied in the food and feed chain: Human and animal health. EFSA Journal. 2021;19 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dairi N., Ferfera-Harrar H., Ramos M., Garrigós M.C. Cellulose acetate/AgNPs-organoclay and/or thymol nano-biocomposite films with combined antimicrobial/antioxidant properties for active food packaging use. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019;121:508–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dang F., Huang Y., Wang Y., Zhou D., Xing B. Transfer and toxicity of silver nanoparticles in the food chain. Environmental Science. Nano. 2021;8:1519–1535. doi: 10.1039/D0EN01190H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. De Silva C., Nawawi N.M., Abd Karim M.M., Abd Gani S., Masarudin M.J., Gunasekaran B., Ahmad S.A. The mechanistic action of biosynthesised silver nanoparticles and its application in aquaculture and livestock industries. Animals. 2021;11:2097. doi: 10.3390/ani11072097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Deljou A., Goudarzi S. Green extracellular synthesis of the silver nanoparticles using thermophilic Bacillus Sp. AZ1 and its antimicrobial activity against several human Pathogenetic Bacteria. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology. 2016;14:25–32. doi: 10.15171/ijb.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Devadiga A., Vidya Shetty K., Saidutta M.B. Highly stable silver nanoparticles synthesized using Terminalia catappa leaves as antibacterial agent and colorimetric mercury sensor. Materials Letters. 2017;207:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dias de Emery B., Zottis Chitolina G., Qadir M.I., Quedi Furian T., Apellanis Borges K., de Souza Moraes H.L.…Pinheiro do Nascimento V. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of silver nanoparticles against Salmonella Enteritidis. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2022;54:285–292. doi: 10.1007/s42770-022-00868-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Duda-Chodak A., Tarko T., Petka-Poniatowska K. Antimicrobial compounds in food packaging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24:2457. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Durán N., Durán M., de Jesus M.B., Seabra A.B., Fávaro W.J., Nakazato G. Silver nanoparticles: A new view on mechanistic aspects on antimicrobial activity. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2016;12:789–799. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. El-Abd N.M., Hamouda R.A., Al-Shaikh T.M., Abdel-Hamid M.S. Influence of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using red alga Corallina elongata on broiler chicks’ performance. Green Processing and Synthesis. 2022;11:238–253. doi: 10.1515/gps-2022-0025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Elayaraja S., Liu G., Zagorsek K., Mabrok M., Ji M., Ye Z.…Rodkhum C. TEMPO-oxidized biodegradable bacterial cellulose (BBC) membrane coated with biologically-synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) as a potential antimicrobial agent in aquaculture (in vitro) Aquaculture. 2021;530 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735746. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. EU Action on Antimicrobial Resistance – European Commission [WWW Document] 2024. https://health.ec.europa.eu/antimicrobial-resistance/eu-action-antimicrobial-resistance_en accessed 11.27.24.
  36. Fahim M., Shahzaib A., Nishat N., Jahan A., Bhat T.A., Inam A. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: A comprehensive review of methods, influencing factors, and applications. JCIS Open. 2024;16 doi: 10.1016/j.jciso.2024.100125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. FAO . FAO/WHO; Rome: 2014. State of the art on the initiatives and activities relevant to risk assessment and risk management of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors - FAO/WHO technical paper. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ferraris C., Rimicci C., Garelli S., Ugazio E., Battaglia L. Nanosystems in cosmetic products: A brief overview of functional, market. Regulatory and Safety Concerns. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1408. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fonseca M.S., Rodrigues D.M., Sokolonski A.R., Stanisic D., Tomé L.M., Góes-Neto A.…Portela R.D. Activity of fusarium oxysporum-based silver nanoparticles on Candida spp. Oral Isolates. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:501. doi: 10.3390/nano12030501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fouda A., Awad M.A., AL-Faifi Z.E., Gad M.E., Al-Khalaf A.A., Yahya R., Hamza M.F. Aspergillus flavus-mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and evaluation of their antibacterial, anti-Candida, Acaricides, and photocatalytic activities. Catalysts. 2022;12:462. doi: 10.3390/catal12050462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Garibo, D., Borbón-Nuñez, H.A., León, J.N.D. de, Mendoza, E.G., Estrada, I., Toledano-Magaña, Y., Tiznado, H., Ovalle-Marroquin, M., Soto-Ramos, A.G., Blanco, A., Rodríguez, J.A., Romo, O.A., Chávez-Almazán, L.A., Susarrey-Arce, A., 2020. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Lysiloma acapulcensis exhibit high-antimicrobial activity. Scientific Reports 10. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69606-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  42. Ghosh P.R., Fawcett D., Sharma S.B., Poinern G.E.J. Production of high-value nanoparticles via biogenic processes using Aquacultural and horticultural food waste. Materials. 2017;10:852. doi: 10.3390/ma10080852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Guo Y., Cichocki N., Schattenberg F., Geffers R., Harms H., Müller S. AgNPs change microbial community structures of wastewater. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;9:3211. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gupta P.C., Sharma N., Rai S., Mishra P. In: Metal and metal-oxide based nanomaterials: Synthesis, agricultural, biomedical and environmental interventions. Bachheti R.K., Bachheti A., Husen A., editors. Springer Nature; Singapore: 2024. Use of smart silver nanoparticles in drug delivery system; pp. 213–241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hamida R.S., Ali M.A., Alkhateeb M.A., Alfassam H.E., Momenah M.A., Bin-Meferij M.M. Harnessing Desmochloris edaphica strain CCAP 6006/5 for the eco-friendly synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Insights into the anticancer and antibacterial efficacy. Molecules. 2024;29:3750. doi: 10.3390/molecules29163750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hamida R.S., Ali M.A., Almohawes Z.N., Alahdal H., Momenah M.A., Bin-Meferij M.M. Green synthesis of hexagonal silver nanoparticles using a novel microalgae Coelastrella aeroterrestrica strain BA_Chlo4 and resulting anticancer, antibacterial, and antioxidant activities. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2002. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14102002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hamouda R.A., Aljohani E.S. Assessment of Silver Nanoparticles Derived from Brown Algae Sargassum vulgare: Insight into Antioxidants, Anticancer, Antibacterial and Hepatoprotective Effect. Marine Drugs. 2024;22:154. doi: 10.3390/md22040154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hamouda R.A., Hussein M.H., Abo-Elmagd R.A., Bawazir S.S. Synthesis and biological characterization of silver nanoparticles derived from the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria limnetica. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:13071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49444-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hamouda R.A., Hussein M.H., Abo-Elmagd R.A., Bawazir S.S. Synthesis and biological characterization of silver nanoparticles derived from the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria limnetica. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:13071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49444-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. He X., Deng H., Hwang H. The current application of nanotechnology in food and agriculture. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 2019;27:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hemlata, Meena P.R., Singh A.P., Tejavath K.K. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Cucumis prophetarum aqueous leaf extract and their antibacterial and Antiproliferative activity against Cancer cell lines. ACS Omega. 2020;5:5520–5528. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Huq M.A. Biogenic silver nanoparticles synthesized by Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus MAHUQ-40 to control antibiotic-resistant human pathogens Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Salmonella typhimurium. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.597502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Huq M.A. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Pseudoduganella eburnea MAHUQ-39 and their antimicrobial mechanisms investigation against drug resistant human pathogens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:1510. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ihtisham M., Noori A., Yadav S., Sarraf M., Kumari P., Brestic M.…Rastogi A. Silver Nanoparticle’s toxicological effects and phytoremediation. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:2164. doi: 10.3390/nano11092164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ilahi N., Haleem A., Iqbal S., Fatima N., Sajjad W., Sideeq A., Ahmed S. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using endophytic fusarium oxysporum strain NFW16 and their in vitro antibacterial potential. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2022;85:1568–1579. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ipe D.S., Kumar P.T.S., Love R.M., Hamlet S.M. Silver nanoparticles at biocompatible dosage synergistically increases bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:1074. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Istiqola A., Syafiuddin A. A review of silver nanoparticles in food packaging technologies: Regulation, methods, properties, migration, and future challenges. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society. 2020;67:1942–1956. doi: 10.1002/jccs.202000179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Jasni A.H., Ali A.A., Sagadevan S., Wahid Z., Jasni A.H., Ali A.A.…Wahid Z. Silver nanoparticles in various new applications, in: Silver Micro-nanoparticles - properties, synthesis, characterization, and applications. IntechOpen. 2021 doi: 10.5772/intechopen.96105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. John M.S., Nagoth J.A., Ramasamy K.P., Mancini A., Giuli G., Miceli C., Pucciarelli S. Synthesis of bioactive silver nanoparticles using new bacterial strains from an Antarctic consortium. Marine Drugs. 2022;20:558. doi: 10.3390/md20090558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Juan C.A., Pérez de la Lastra J.M., Plou F.J., Pérez-Lebeña E. The chemistry of reactive oxygen species (ROS) revisited: Outlining their role in biological macromolecules (DNA, lipids and proteins) and induced pathologies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22:4642. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kah G., Chandran R., Abrahamse H. Biogenic silver nanoparticles for targeted Cancer therapy and enhancing photodynamic therapy. Cells. 2023;12:2012. doi: 10.3390/cells12152012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Karthiga P. Preparation of silver nanoparticles by Garcinia mangostana stem extract and investigation of the antimicrobial properties. Biotechnology Research and Innovation. 2018;2:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.biori.2017.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Khan D.A., Hassan F., Ullah H., Karim S., Baseer A., Abid M.A.…Murtaza G. Antibacterial activity of Phyllantus emblica, Coriandrum sativum, Culinaris medic, Lawsonia alba and Cucumis sativus. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica. 2013;70:855–859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Khan F., Shahid A., Zhu H., Wang N., Javed M.R., Ahmad N.…Mehmood M.A. Prospects of algae-based green synthesis of nanoparticles for environmental applications. Chemosphere. 2022;293 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Khan S., Zahoor M., Sher Khan R., Ikram M., Islam N.U. The impact of silver nanoparticles on the growth of plants: The agriculture applications. Heliyon. 2023;9 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Khan S., Zahoor M., Sher Khan R., Ikram M., Islam N.U. The impact of silver nanoparticles on the growth of plants: The agriculture applications. Heliyon. 2023;9 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Khorasani S., Ghandehari Yazdi A.P., Saadatfar A., Kamali Rousta L., Nejatian M., Abarian M., Jafari S.M. Valorization of saffron Tepals for the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and evaluation of their efficiency against foodborne pathogens. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2022;13:4417–4430. doi: 10.1007/s12649-022-01791-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kiani B.H., Arshad I., Najeeb S., Okla M.K., Almanaa T.N., Al-Qahtani W.H., Abdel-Maksoud M.A. Evaluation of biogenic silver nanoparticles synthesized from vegetable waste. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2023;18:6527–6544. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S432252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kim D.-Y., Patel S.K.S., Rasool K., Lone N., Bhatia S.K., Seth C.S., Ghodake G.S. Bioinspired silver nanoparticle-based nanocomposites for effective control of plant pathogens: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;908 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kostic D., Vukasinovic-Sekulic M., Armentano I., Torre L., Obradovic B. Multifunctional ternary composite films based on PLA and ag/alginate microbeads: Physical characterization and silver release kinetics. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2019;98:1159–1168. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kumar S., Basumatary I.B., Sudhani H.P.K., Bajpai V.K., Chen L., Shukla S., Mukherjee A. Plant extract mediated silver nanoparticles and their applications as antimicrobials and in sustainable food packaging: A state-of-the-art review. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021;112:651–666. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kumari R., Suman K., Karmakar S., Mishra V., Lakra S.G., Saurav G.K., Mahto B.K. Regulation and safety measures for nanotechnology-based Agri-products. Frontiers in Genome Editing. 2023;5:1200987. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2023.1200987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. de Lacerda Coriolano, D., de Souza, J.B., Bueno, E.V., Medeiros, S.M. de F.R. dos S., Cavalcanti, I.D.L., Cavalcanti, I.M.F., 2020. Antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of silver nanoparticles against antibiotic-sensitive and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 52, 267–278. Doi: 10.1007/s42770-020-00406-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  74. Larrañaga-Tapia M., Betancourt-Tovar B., Videa M., Antunes-Ricardo M.L., Cholula-Diaz J. Green synthesis trends and potential applications of bimetallic nanoparticles towards the sustainable development goals 2030. Nanoscale Advances. 2024;6:51–71. doi: 10.1039/D3NA00761H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lawal M., Payne J., Onyeaka H., Alao A.M., Okoampah E. Boosting food safety in Ghana: Exploring the future of nanotechnology. Nano Select. 2024;5:2300078. doi: 10.1002/nano.202300078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Leão C., Silveira L., Usié A., Gião J., Clemente L., Themudo P.…Pista A. Genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Enteritidis from Human and Non-Human Sources in Portugal. Pathogens. 2024;13:112. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13020112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lee N.-Y., Ko W.-C., Hsueh P.-R. Front; Pharmacol: 2019. Nanoparticles in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms; p. 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Li C.-C., Dang F., Li M., Zhu M., Zhong H., Hintelmann H., Zhou D.-M. Effects of exposure pathways on the accumulation and phytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in soybean and rice. Nanotoxicology. 2017;11:699–709. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1344740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Li H., Xu H. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to environmental silver and antimicrobial strategies for silver: A review. Environmental Research. 2024;248 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Li W., Qu F., Chen Y., Sun Y., Zhang J., Xie G.…Xu H. Antimicrobial activity of sliver nanoparticles synthesized by the leaf extract of Cinnamomum camphora. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2021;172 doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lisboa, H.M., Pasquali, M.B., dos Anjos, A.I., Sarinho, A.M., de Melo, E.D., Andrade, R., Batista, L., Lima, J., Diniz, Y., Barros, A., 2024. Innovative and sustainable food preservation techniques: Enhancing food quality, safety, and environmental sustainability. Sustainability 16, 8223. Doi: 10.3390/su16188223. [DOI]
  82. Loo Y.Y., Rukayadi Y., Nor-Khaizura M.-A.-R., Kuan C.H., Chieng B.W., Nishibuchi M., Radu S. In vitro antimicrobial activity of green synthesized silver nanoparticles against selected gram-negative foodborne pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:1555. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Loo Y.Y., Rukayadi Y., Nor-Khaizura M.-A.-R., Kuan C.H., Chieng B.W., Nishibuchi M., Radu S. In vitro antimicrobial activity of green synthesized silver nanoparticles against selected gram-negative foodborne pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Losasso C., Belluco S., Cibin V., Zavagnin P., Mičetić I., Gallocchio F.…Ricci A. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles: Sensitivity of different Salmonella serovars. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lotfy W.A., Alkersh B.M., Sabry S.A., Ghozlan H.A. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by aspergillus terreus: Characterization, optimization, and biological activities. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.633468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Mandal A.K., Nayak R., Pradhan B., Behera C., Behera A.K., Parida S.…Jena M. Algal-derived nanoparticles and their antibacterial potential: Current evidence and future prospectives. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2023;211 doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2023.106790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Maniah K., Olyan Al-Otibi F., Mohamed S., Said B.A., Ragab AbdelGawwad M., Taha Yassin M. Synergistic antibacterial activity of biogenic AgNPs with antibiotics against multidrug resistant bacterial strains. Journal of King Saud University, Science. 2024;36 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103461. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Manikandan N.A., McCann R., Kakavas D., Rochfort K.D., Sreenilayam S.P., Alkan G.…Freeland B. Production of silver Nano-inks and surface coatings for anti-microbial food packaging and its ecological impact. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24:5341. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Manikandan V., Velmurugan P., Park J.-H., Chang W.-S., Park Y.-J., Jayanthi P., Cho M., Oh B.-T. Green synthesis of silver oxide nanoparticles and its antibacterial activity against dental pathogens. 3 Biotech. 2017;7:72. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0670-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Markowska K., Grudniak A.M., Milczarek B., Wolska K.I. The effect of silver nanoparticles on listeria monocytogenes PCM2191 peptidoglycan metabolism and cell permeability. Polish Journal of Microbiology. 2018;67:315–320. doi: 10.21307/pjm-2018-037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Masadeh M.M., Al-Tal Z., Khanfar M.S., Alzoubi K.H., Sabi S.H., Masadeh M.M. Synergistic effect of silver nanoparticles with antibiotics for Eradicationof pathogenic biofilms. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2024;25:1884–1903. doi: 10.2174/0113892010279217240102100405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Mathew S., Radhakrishnan E.K. In: Silver Nanomaterials for Agri-Food Applications, Nanobiotechnology for Plant Protection. Abd-Elsalam K.A., editor. Elsevier; 2021. Chapter 6 - silver-based nanomaterials for food packaging applications; pp. 125–146. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. McGee C.F. The effects of silver nanoparticles on the microbial nitrogen cycle: A review of the known risks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27:31061–31073. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09548-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. McGillicuddy E., Murray I., Kavanagh S., Morrison L., Fogarty A., Cormican M., Dockery P., Prendergast M., Rowan N., Morris D. Silver nanoparticles in the environment: Sources, detection and ecotoxicology. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;575:231–246. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. McMurray R.L., Ball M.E.E., Tunney M.M., Corcionivoschi N., Situ C. Antibacterial activity of four plant extracts extracted from traditional Chinese medicinal plants against listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis. Microorganisms. 2020;8:962. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. McNeilly O., Mann R., Hamidian M., Gunawan C. Emerging concern for silver nanoparticle resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii and other Bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.652863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Mencía-Gutiérrez A., García-Peña F.J., González F., Pastor-Tiburón N., Pérez-Cobo I., Marín M., Martín-Maldonado B. Exploring the prevalence and resistance of Campylobacter in urban bird populations. Vet. Sci. 2024;11:210. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11050210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Mittal A.K., Bhaumik J., Kumar S., Banerjee U.C. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles: Elucidation of prospective mechanism and therapeutic potential. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2014;415:39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Mittal D., Kaur G., Singh P., Yadav K., Ali S.A. Nanoparticle-based sustainable agriculture and food science: Recent advances and future outlook. Frontiers in Nanotechnology. 2020;2 doi: 10.3389/fnano.2020.579954. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. More P.R., Pandit S., Filippis A.D., Franci G., Mijakovic I., Galdiero M. Silver nanoparticles: Bactericidal and mechanistic approach against drug resistant pathogens. Microorganisms. 2023;11:369. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Muddassir M., Raza A., Munir S., Basirat A., Ahmed M., Butt M.S.…Naqvi S.Z.H. Antibacterial efficacy of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) against metallo-β-lactamase and extended spectrum β-lactamase producing clinically procured isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:20685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24531-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Mukherjee A., Sarkar D., Sasmal S. A review of green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using algae. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.693899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Naghizadeh A., Mizwari Z.M., Ghoreishi S.M., Lashgari S., Mortazavi-Derazkola S., Rezaie B. Biogenic and eco-benign synthesis of silver nanoparticles using jujube core extract and its performance in catalytic and pharmaceutical applications: Removal of industrial contaminants and in-vitro antibacterial and anticancer activities. Environmental Technology and Innovation. 2021;23 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Nanda A., Saravanan M. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Staphylococcus aureus and its antimicrobial activity against MRSA and MRSE. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2009;5:452–456. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2009.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Neethu S., Midhun S.J., Radhakrishnan E.K., Jyothis M. Green synthesized silver nanoparticles by marine endophytic fungus Penicillium polonicum and its antibacterial efficacy against biofilm forming, multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2018;116:263–272. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. das Neves M.d.S., Scandorieiro S., Pereira G.N., Ribeiro J.M., Seabra A.B., Dias A.P.…Nakazato G. Antibacterial activity of biodegradable films incorporated with biologically-synthesized silver nanoparticles and the evaluation of their migration to chicken meat. Antibiotics. 2023;12:178. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Nielsen M.B., Skjolding L., Baun A., Hansen S.F. European nanomaterial legislation in the past 20 years – Closing the final gaps. NanoImpact. 2023;32 doi: 10.1016/j.impact.2023.100487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Noga M., Milan J., Frydrych A., Jurowski K. Toxicological aspects, safety assessment, and green toxicology of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)—Critical review: State of the art. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24:5133. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Nqakala Z.B., Sibuyi N.R.S., Fadaka A.O., Meyer M., Onani M.O., Madiehe A.M. Advances in nanotechnology towards development of silver nanoparticle-based wound-healing agents. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22:11272. doi: 10.3390/ijms222011272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Oktaviani D.F., Nursatya S.M., Tristiani F., Faozi A.N., Saputra R.H., Meinita M.D.N., Riyanti Antibacterial activity from seaweeds Turbinaria ornata and Chaetomorpha antennina against fouling Bacteria. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;255 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/255/1/012045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. de Oliveira L.M.A., Ribeiro R.L., Ganda E. Editorial: Foodborne bacterial pathogens under the one health perspective - antimicrobial resistance, epidemiology, virulence, and zoonotic impact. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2024;14 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1379188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Osorio-Echavarría J., Osorio-Echavarría J., Ossa-Orozco C.P., Gómez-Vanegas N.A. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using white-rot fungus anamorphous Bjerkandera sp. R1: Influence of silver nitrate concentration and fungus growth time. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:3842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82514-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Ottoni C.A., Lima Neto M.C., Léo P., Ortolan B.D., Barbieri E., De Souza A.O. Environmental impact of biogenic silver nanoparticles in soil and aquatic organisms. Chemosphere. 2020;239 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Palácio S.M., Nogueira D.A., Espinoza-Quiñones F.R., de Campos É.A., Veit M.T. Silver nanoparticles bioaccumulation by aquatic Macrophyte Salvinia auriculata. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2020;231:62. doi: 10.1007/s11270-020-4435-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  115. Palanisamy J., Palanichamy V.S., Vellaichamy G., Perumal P., Vinayagam J., Gunalan S., Prabhakaran S.G., Thiraviam P.P., Musthafa F., Balaraman A.K., Rathinasamy S. Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol; Naunyn: 2024. A comprehensive review on the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from marine sources. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Pandey V.K., Upadhyay S.N., Niranjan K., Mishra P.K. Antimicrobial biodegradable chitosan-based composite Nano-layers for food packaging. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020;157:212–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Park H.S., Behzadi Tayemeh M., Yu I.J., Johari S.A. Evaluation of silver nanowires (AgNWs) toxicity on reproductive success of Daphnia magna over two generations and their teratogenic effect on embryonic development. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;412 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Patra A.K. Are nanomaterials potential new generation antimicrobial feed additives in livestock? Indian Journal of Animal Health. 2019;58:105. doi: 10.36062/ijah.58.2SPL.2019.105-120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Pérez-Rodríguez F., Mercanoglu Taban B. A state-of-art review on multi-drug resistant pathogens in foods of animal origin: Risk factors and mitigation strategies. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:2091. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Peters R.J.B., Bouwmeester H., Gottardo S., Amenta V., Arena M., Brandhoff P.…Aschberger K. Nanomaterials for products and application in agriculture, feed and food. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2016;54:155–164. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  121. Pletzer D., Asnis J., Slavin Y.N., Hancock R.E.W., Bach H., Saatchi K., Häfeli U.O. Rapid microwave-based method for the preparation of antimicrobial lignin-capped silver nanoparticles active against multidrug-resistant bacteria. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2021;596 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Prasad R., Bhattacharyya A., Nguyen Q.D. Front; Microbiol: 2017. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: Recent developments, challenges, and perspectives; p. 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Priyadarshini S.S., Sethi S., Rout S., Mishra P.M., Pradhan N. Green synthesis of microalgal biomass-silver nanoparticle composite showing antimicrobial activity and heterogenous catalysis of nitrophenol reduction. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2023;13:7783–7795. doi: 10.1007/s13399-021-01825-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  124. Qais, F.A., Shafiq, A., Khan, H.M., Husain, F.M., Khan, R.A., Alenazi, B., Alsalme, A., Ahmad, I., 2019. Antibacterial Effect of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Murraya koenigii (L.) against Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2019, 4649506. Doi: 10.1155/2019/4649506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  125. Radley-Gardner O., Beale H., Zimmermann R., editors. Fundamental texts on European private law. Hart Publishing; 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  126. Radzig M.A., Nadtochenko V.A., Koksharova O.A., Kiwi J., Lipasova V.A., Khmel I.A. Antibacterial effects of silver nanoparticles on gram-negative bacteria: Influence on the growth and biofilms formation, mechanisms of action. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces. 2013;102:300–306. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Rajivgandhi G.N., Kanisha C.C., Ramachandran G., Manoharan N., Mothana R.A., Siddiqui N.A.…Almarfadi O.M. Phytochemical screening and anti-oxidant activity of Sargassum wightii enhances the anti-bacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28:1763–1769. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Ranjan S., Dasgupta N., Singh S., Gandhi M. Toxicity and regulations of food nanomaterials. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2019;17:929–944. doi: 10.1007/s10311-018-00851-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  129. Rao M.M.V., Mohammad N., Banerjee S., Khanna P.K. Synthesis and food packaging application of silver nano-particles: A review. Hybrid Advances. 2024;6 doi: 10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  130. Rivera-Mendoza D., Quiñones B., Huerta-Saquero A., Castro-Longoria E. Antimicrobial activity of green synthesized silver and copper oxide nanoparticles against the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Antibiotics. 2024;13:650. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13070650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Rivera-Mendoza D., Quiñones B., Huerta-Saquero A., Castro-Longoria E. Antimicrobial activity of green synthesized silver and copper oxide nanoparticles against the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Antibiotics. 2024;13:650. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13070650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Rodríguez-Félix F., Graciano-Verdugo A.Z., Moreno-Vásquez M.J., Lagarda-Díaz I., Barreras-Urbina C.G., Armenta-Villegas L.…Tapia-Hernández J.A. Trends in sustainable green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Agri-food waste extracts and their applications in health. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2022;2022:8874003. doi: 10.1155/2022/8874003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  133. Rodríguez-Luis, O.E., Hernandez-Delgadillo, R., Sánchez-Nájera, R.I., Martínez-Castañón, G.A., Niño-Martínez, N., Sánchez Navarro, M. del C., Ruiz, F., Cabral-Romero, C., 2016. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their bactericidal and Antimycotic activities against Oral microbes. Journal of Nanomaterials 2016, e9204573. Doi: 10.1155/2016/9204573. [DOI]
  134. Rodríguez-Serrano C., Guzmán-Moreno J., Ángeles-Chávez C., Rodríguez-González V., Ortega-Sigala J.J., Ramírez-Santoyo R.M., Vidales-Rodríguez L.E. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by fusarium scirpi and its potential as antimicrobial agent against uropathogenic Escherichia coli biofilms. PLoS One. 2020;15 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Salam M.A., Al-Amin M.Y., Salam M.T., Pawar J.S., Akhter N., Rabaan A.A., Alqumber M.A.A. Antimicrobial resistance: A growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare. 2023;11:1946. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Salem W., Leitner D.R., Zingl F.G., Schratter G., Prassl R., Goessler W.…Schild S. Antibacterial activity of silver and zinc nanoparticles against Vibrio cholerae and enterotoxic Escherichia coli. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2015;305:85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Samtiya M., Matthews K.R., Dhewa T., Puniya A.K. Antimicrobial resistance in the food chain: Trends, mechanisms, pathways, and possible regulation strategies. Foods. 2022;11:2966. doi: 10.3390/foods11192966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Saratale R.G., Saratale G.D., Shin H.S., Jacob J.M., Pugazhendhi A., Bhaisare M., Kumar G. New insights on the green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant and waste biomaterials: Current knowledge, their agricultural and environmental applications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25:10164–10183. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9912-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Schrijver R., Stijntjes M., Rodríguez-Baño J., Tacconelli E., Babu Rajendran N., Voss A. Review of antimicrobial resistance surveillance programmes in livestock and meat in EU with focus on humans. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018;24:577–590. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. EFSA Scientific Committee, Hardy, A., Benford, D., Halldorsson, T., Jeger, M.J., Knutsen, H.K., More, S., Naegeli, H., Noteborn, H., Ockleford, C., Ricci, A., Rychen, G., Schlatter, J.R., Silano, V., Solecki, R., Turck, D., Younes, M., Chaudhry, Q., Cubadda, F., Gott, D., Oomen, A., Weigel, S., Karamitrou, M., Schoonjans, R., Mortensen, A., 2018. Guidance on risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain: Part 1, human and animal health. EFSA Journal 16. Doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  141. Shahriari Ahmadi F., Tanhaeian A., Habibi Pirkohi M. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and its inhibitory effect on growth and virulence of listeria monocytogenes. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology. 2016;14:163–168. doi: 10.15171/ijb.1310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Shaikh S., Nazam N., Rizvi S.M.D., Ahmad K., Baig M.H., Lee E.J., Choi I. Mechanistic insights into the antimicrobial actions of metallic nanoparticles and their implications for multidrug resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20:2468. doi: 10.3390/ijms20102468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Shanmugam N., Rajkamal P., Cholan S., Kannadasan N., Sathishkumar K., Viruthagiri G., Sundaramanickam A. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from the marine seaweed Sargassum wightii and their antibacterial activity against some human pathogens. Applied Nanoscience. 2014;4:881–888. doi: 10.1007/s13204-013-0271-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  144. Sharma S., Sharma N., Kaushal N. Utilization of novel bacteriocin synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) for their application in antimicrobial packaging for preservation of tomato fruit. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2023;7:1072738. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1072738. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Silva A., Silva V., Pereira J.E., Maltez L., Igrejas G., Valentão P.…Poeta P. Antimicrobial resistance and clonal lineages of Escherichia coli from food-producing animals. Antibiotics. 2023;12:1061. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12061061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Singh, D., Rathod, V., Ninganagouda, S., Hiremath, J., Singh, A.K., Mathew, J., 2014. Optimization and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticle by Endophytic Fungi Penicillium sp. Isolated from Curcuma longa (Turmeric) and Application Studies against MDR E. coli and S. aureus. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2014, 408021. Doi: 10.1155/2014/408021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  147. Singh G., Thakur N., Kumar R. Nanoparticles in drinking water: Assessing health risks and regulatory challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;949 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Singh P., Ali S.W., Kale R.D. Antimicrobial nanomaterials as advanced coatings for self-sanitizing of textile clothing and personal protective equipment. ACS Omega. 2023;8:8159–8171. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c06343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Siritongsuk P., Thammawithan S., Srichaiyapol O., Nasompag S., Pongha S., Daduang S.…Patramanon R. Synthesis and application of AgNPs-chitosan composite as a self-disinfecting coating in water-based polyurethane. Coatings. 2022;12:1832. doi: 10.3390/coatings12121832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  150. Soleimani M., Habibi-Pirkoohi M. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Chlorella vulgaris and evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus. Avicenna Journal Of Medical Biotechnology. 2017;9:120–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Solís-Sandí I., Cordero-Fuentes S., Pereira-Reyes R., Vega-Baudrit J.R., Batista-Menezes D., Montes de Oca-Vásquez G. Optimization of the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using bacterial extracts and their antimicrobial potential. Biotechnology Reports. 2023;40 doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2023.e00816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Sondhi P., Adeniji T., Lingden D., Stine K.J. In: Advances in clinical chemistry, advances in clinical chemistry. Makowski G.S., editor. Elsevier; 2024. Chapter one - advances in endotoxin analysis; pp. 1–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Summer M., Ali S., Tahir H.M., Abaidullah R., Fiaz U., Mumtaz S.…Farooq M.A. Mode of action of biogenic silver, zinc, copper, titanium and cobalt nanoparticles against antibiotics resistant pathogens. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials. 2024;34:1417–1451. doi: 10.1007/s10904-023-02935-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  154. Tarannum N., Divya K., Gautam Y. Facile green synthesis and applications of silver nanoparticles: A state-of-the-art review. RSC Advances. 2019;9:34926–34948. doi: 10.1039/C9RA04164H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. The FAO Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance . 2021–2025. 2021. FAO. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  156. Thomas R., Nair A.P., KR S., Mathew J., EK R. Antibacterial activity and synergistic effect of biosynthesized AgNPs with antibiotics against multidrug-resistant biofilm-forming coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from clinical samples. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2014;173:449–460. doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-0852-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Torabfam M., Yüce M. Microwave-assisted green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using dried extracts of Chlorella vulgaris and antibacterial activity studies. Green Processing and Synthesis. 2020;9:283–293. doi: 10.1515/gps-2020-0024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  158. Trotta F., Da Silva S., Massironi A., Mirpoor S.F., Lignou S., Ghawi S.K., Charalampopoulos D. Silver bionanocomposites as active food packaging: Recent advances & future trends tackling the food waste crisis. Polymers. 2023;15:4243. doi: 10.3390/polym15214243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Trzcińska-Wencel J., Wypij M., Terzyk A.P., Rai M., Golińska P. Biofabrication of novel silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles from fusarium solani IOR 825 and their potential application in agriculture as biocontrol agents of phytopathogens, and seed germination and seedling growth promoters. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2023;11:1235437. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1235437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Vanlalveni C., Lallianrawna S., Biswas A., Selvaraj M., Changmai B., Rokhum S.L. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant extracts and their antimicrobial activities: A review of recent literature. RSC Advances. 2021;11:2804–2837. doi: 10.1039/d0ra09941d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Waalewijn-Kool P.L., Klein K., Forniés R.M., van Gestel C.A.M. Bioaccumulation and toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate to the soil arthropod Folsomia candida. Ecotoxicology. 2014;23:1629–1637. doi: 10.1007/s10646-014-1302-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Wahab A., Muhammad M., Ullah S., Abdi G., Shah G.M., Zaman W., Ayaz A. Agriculture and environmental management through nanotechnology: Eco-friendly nanomaterial synthesis for soil-plant systems, food safety, and sustainability. Science Total Environment. 2024;926 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Wang D., Xue B., Wang L., Zhang Y., Liu L., Zhou Y. Fungus-mediated green synthesis of nano-silver using aspergillus sydowii and its antifungal/antiproliferative activities. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:10356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89854-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Wolny-Koładka K., Malina D., Suder A., Pluta K., Wzorek Z. Bio-based synthesis of silver nanoparticles from waste agricultural biomass and its antimicrobial activity. Processes. 2022;10:389. doi: 10.3390/pr10020389. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  165. Wu J., Wang G., Vijver M.G., Bosker T., Peijnenburg W.J.G.M. Foliar versus root exposure of AgNPs to lettuce: Phytotoxicity, antioxidant responses and internal translocation. Environmental Pollution. 2020;261 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Xu J., Yıldıztekin M., Han D., Keskin C., Baran A., Baran M.F., Eftekhari A., Ava C.A., Kandemir S.İ., Cebe D.B., Dağ B., Beilerli A., Khalilov R. Biosynthesis, characterization, and investigation of antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of silver nanoparticles using Solanum tuberosum peel aqueous extract. Heliyon. 2023;9 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Yadav, A.N., Mishra, S., Singh, S., Gupta, A., 2019. Recent advancement in white biotechnology through Fungi: Volume 1: Diversity and Enzymes Perspectives. Springer.
  168. Yadav J., Tare H. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: Mechanisms, challenges, and applications. Int. J. Pharm. Qual. Assur. 2024;15:546–553. doi: 10.25258/ijpqa.15.1.82. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  169. Yan A., Chen Z. Impacts of silver nanoparticles on plants: A focus on the Phytotoxicity and underlying mechanism. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20:1003. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Yassin M.A., Elgorban A.M., El-Samawaty A.E.-R.M.A., Almunqedhi B.M.A. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Penicillium verrucosum and analysis of their antifungal activity. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28:2123–2127. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Ying S., Guan Z., Ofoegbu P.C., Clubb P., Rico C., He F., Hong J. Green synthesis of nanoparticles: Current developments and limitations. Environmental Technology and Innovation. 2022;26 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  172. Yoo H.J., Kim N., Lee H., Kim, Daeho, Ow L.T.C.…Han S.S. 2023. Bespoke nanoparticle synthesis and chemical knowledge discovery via autonomous experimentations. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  173. Zarei M., Jamnejad A., Khajehali E. Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles against four foodborne pathogens. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2014;7 doi: 10.5812/jjm.8720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Zhang X., Dang D., Zheng L., Wu L., Wu Y., Li H., Yu Y. Effect of ag nanoparticles on denitrification and microbial community in a Paddy Soil. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.785439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Zhou W., Jia Z., Xiong P., Yan J., Li Y., Li M.…Zheng Y. Bioinspired and biomimetic AgNPs/gentamicin-embedded silk fibroin coatings for robust antibacterial and Osteogenetic applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017;9:25830–25846. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b06757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Zorraquín-Peña I., Cueva C., Bartolomé B., Moreno-Arribas M.V. Silver Nanoparticles against Foodborne Bacteria. Effects at Intestinal Level and Health Limitations. Microorganisms. 2020;8:132. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8010132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.


Articles from Food Chemistry: X are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES