Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1988 Jan;395:215–231. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp016915

The influence of the sympathetic outflow on aortic chemoreceptors of the cat during hypoxia and hypercapnia.

A Anand 1, A S Paintal 1
PMCID: PMC1191990  PMID: 3137324

Abstract

1. An attempt has been made to reconcile differing observations, made by different groups of investigators, on the responses of aortic chemoreceptors of cats during normoxia, hypoxia and hypercapnia. 2. In cats anaesthetized with sodium pentobarbitone it was observed that during hypoxic stimulation of twelve chemoreceptors, an intravenous injection of about 20 mg sodium pentobarbitone produced hypotension which was accompanied by an initial fall in chemoreceptor activity instead of the expected increase that invariably occurred in all the receptors when hypotension was produced mechanically by distending a balloon in the right atrium (twenty-six during normoxia, eleven during hypoxia and eight during hypercapnia). 3. In twelve receptors a reflex fall in blood pressure produced by injecting 8-25 micrograms veratridine (Bezold-Jarisch reflex) yielded results qualitatively similar to those following injection of sodium pentobarbitone. 4. In sixteen out of twenty-five chemoreceptors it was observed that ventilating the cat with 5.6-6.7% CO2 produced either no or little increase in activity; in nine receptors there was a clear increase in activity, which fell initially or was abolished after injecting a single dose of 20 mg sodium pentobarbitone. 5. In all seven chemoreceptors tested in seven deeply anaesthetized cats it was found that a larger dose (about 50-60 mg) of sodium pentobarbitone had no direct depressant effect on aortic chemoreceptor activity. It followed that the initial depressant effect of the much smaller doses of sodium pentobarbitone observed during hypoxic and hypercapnic stimulation (see above) must be due to reduction in the sympathetic outflow to the aortic bodies. This conclusion was supported by the results following injections of veratridine. 6. By comparing the present results with those reported previously it was concluded that the variations in the responses of aortic chemoreceptors during hypoxia and hypercapnia reported by different investigators could be partly due to variations in the level of sympathetic activity prevailing under different experimental conditions.

Full text

PDF
215

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anand A. Reflex stimulation of aortic chemoreceptors and the role of vascular receptors. Respir Physiol. 1979 Sep;38(1):59–69. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(79)90006-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fitzgerald R. S., Dehghani G. A. Neural responses of the cat carotid and aortic bodies to hypercapnia and hypoxia. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982 Mar;52(3):596–601. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.3.596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hanson M. A., Rao P. S., Torrance R. W. Carbon dioxide sensitivity of aortic chemoreceptors in the cat. Respir Physiol. 1979 Apr;36(3):301–309. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(79)90043-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. LEE K. D., MAYOU R. A., TORRANCE R. W. THE EFFECT OF BLOOD PRESSURE UPON CHEMORECEPTOR DISCHARGE TO HYPOXIA, AND THE MODIFICATION OF THIS EFFECT BY THE SYMPATHETIC-ADRENAL SYSTEM. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1964 Apr;49:171–183. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1964.sp001717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lahiri S., Mulligan E., Nishino T., Mokashi A. Aortic body chemoreceptor responses to changes in PCO2 and PO2 in the cat. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Oct;47(4):858–866. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1979.47.4.858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lahiri S., Nishino T., Mokashi A., Mulligan E. Relative responses of aortic body and carotid body chemoreceptors to hypotension. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 May;48(5):781–788. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.5.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mills E. Activity of aortic chemoreceptors during electrical stimulation of the stellate ganglion in the cat. J Physiol. 1968 Nov;199(1):103–114. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mulligan E., Lahiri S., Mokashi A., Matsumoto S., McGregor K. H. Adrenergic mechanisms in oxygen chemoreception in the cat aortic body. Respir Physiol. 1986 Mar;63(3):375–382. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(86)90103-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Neil E., O'Regan R. G. The effects of electrical stimulation of the distal end of the cut sinus and aortic nerves on peripheral arterial chemoreceptor activity in the cat. J Physiol. 1971 May;215(1):15–32. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PAINTAL A. S. EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON VERTEBRATE MECHANORECEPTORS. Pharmacol Rev. 1964 Dec;16:341–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Paintal A. S. Mechanism of stimulation of aortic chemoreceptors by natural stimuli and chemical substances. J Physiol. 1967 Mar;189(1):63–84. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Paintal A. S., Riley R. L. Responses of aortic chemoreceptors. J Appl Physiol. 1966 Mar;21(2):543–548. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1966.21.2.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paintal A. S. The responses of chemoreceptors at reduced temperatures. J Physiol. 1971 Aug;217(1):1–18. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pokorski M., Lahiri S. Inhibition of aortic chemoreceptor responses by metabolic alkalosis in the cat. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982 Jul;53(1):75–80. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pokorski M., Mokashi A., Mulligan E., Nishino T., Lahiri S. Responses of aortic chemoreceptors before and after pneumothorax in the cat. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981 Sep;51(3):665–670. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1981.51.3.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sampson S. R., Hainsworth R. Responses of aortic body chemoreceptors of the cat to physiological stimuli. Am J Physiol. 1972 Apr;222(4):953–958. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1972.222.4.953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES