Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1988 Feb;396:267–296. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp016962

Kinetic differences between embryonic- and adult-type acetylcholine receptors in rat myotubes.

F Jaramillo 1, S M Schuetze 1
PMCID: PMC1192045  PMID: 2457689

Abstract

1. The burst structures of embryonic-type (low-gamma) and adult-type (high-gamma) nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (AChRs) in rat myotubes were investigated with the patch clamp technique. The channels were activated with the agonists ACh and suberyldicholine (SubCh). 2. With either agonist, the distribution of burst durations showed two exponential components for both channel types: a 'long' component that corresponds to bursts of one or more openings and a 'brief' component that includes short, isolated openings. 3. For low-gamma channels, the percentage of all openings associated with the brief component decreased from approximately 40% at 10-100 nM-ACh to less than 10% at 10-100 microM-ACh. 4. Both high-gamma and low-gamma long bursts were interrupted by brief (30-90 microseconds) closures and longer (approximately 1 ms) transitions to a partially open (subconductance) state. The duration of brief closures and partial openings was relatively independent of the agonist, but their frequency within low-gamma bursts was 3-fold higher with SubCh than with ACh. 5. Brief closures are interpreted as transitions to a closed, doubly liganded state from which the channel can reopen. This model predicts that the channel opening rate is greater than 10,000 s-1 for both channel types at room temperature. 6. Estimates of the channel opening rate inferred from the rising phase of miniature end-plate currents recorded from rat soleus fibres are consistent with this interpretation. 7. Both high-gamma and low-gamma channels apparently operate via similar gating mechanisms. Differences in their gating behaviour can be explained in terms of faster kinetic rate constants for high-gamma channels.

Full text

PDF
267

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Auerbach A., Sachs F. Flickering of a nicotinic ion channel to a subconductance state. Biophys J. 1983 Apr;42(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84362-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auerbach A., Sachs F. Single-channel currents from acetylcholine receptors in embryonic chick muscle. Kinetic and conductance properties of gaps within bursts. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):187–198. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84147-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brehm P., Kidokoro Y., Moody-Corbett F. Acetylcholine receptor channel properties during development of Xenopus muscle cells in culture. J Physiol. 1984 Dec;357:203–217. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A. G. On the stochastic properties of single ion channels. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981 Mar 6;211(1183):205–235. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1981.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colquhoun D., Sakmann B. Fast events in single-channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end-plate. J Physiol. 1985 Dec;369:501–557. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colquhoun D., Sakmann B. Fluctuations in the microsecond time range of the current through single acetylcholine receptor ion channels. Nature. 1981 Dec 3;294(5840):464–466. doi: 10.1038/294464a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dionne V. E., Leibowitz M. D. Acetylcholine receptor kinetics. A description from single-channel currents at snake neuromuscular junctions. Biophys J. 1982 Sep;39(3):253–261. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84515-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fischbach G. D., Schuetze S. M. A post-natal decrease in acetylcholine channel open time at rat end-plates. J Physiol. 1980 Jun;303:125–137. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gardner P., Ogden D. C., Colquhoun D. Conductances of single ion channels opened by nicotinic agonists are indistinguishable. Nature. 1984 May 10;309(5964):160–162. doi: 10.1038/309160a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamill O. P., Sakmann B. Multiple conductance states of single acetylcholine receptor channels in embryonic muscle cells. Nature. 1981 Dec 3;294(5840):462–464. doi: 10.1038/294462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hestrin S., Korenbrot J. I., Maricq A. V. Kinetics of activation of acetylcholine receptors in a mouse muscle cell line under a range of acetylcholine concentrations. Biophys J. 1987 Mar;51(3):449–455. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83366-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jackson M. B., Wong B. S., Morris C. E., Lecar H., Christian C. N. Successive openings of the same acetylcholine receptor channel are correlated in open time. Biophys J. 1983 Apr;42(1):109–114. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84375-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Land B. R., Harris W. V., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Diffusion and binding constants for acetylcholine derived from the falling phase of miniature endplate currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1594–1598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Acetylcholine receptor site density affects the rising phase of miniature endplate currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3736–3740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Kinetic parameters for acetylcholine interaction in intact neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):7200–7204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leibowitz M. D., Dionne V. E. Single-channel acetylcholine receptor kinetics. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):153–163. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84144-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Magleby K. L., Pallotta B. S. Burst kinetics of single calcium-activated potassium channels in cultured rat muscle. J Physiol. 1983 Nov;344:605–623. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mishina M., Takai T., Imoto K., Noda M., Takahashi T., Numa S., Methfessel C., Sakmann B. Molecular distinction between fetal and adult forms of muscle acetylcholine receptor. Nature. 1986 May 22;321(6068):406–411. doi: 10.1038/321406a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neher E., Steinbach J. H. Local anaesthetics transiently block currents through single acetylcholine-receptor channels. J Physiol. 1978 Apr;277:153–176. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sachs F., Neil J., Barkakati N. The automated analysis of data from single ionic channels. Pflugers Arch. 1982 Dec;395(4):331–340. doi: 10.1007/BF00580798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sakmann B., Brenner H. R. Change in synaptic channel gating during neuromuscular development. Nature. 1978 Nov 23;276(5686):401–402. doi: 10.1038/276401a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schuetze S. M., Vicini S. Apparent acetylcholine receptor channel conversion at individual rat soleus end-plates in vitro. J Physiol. 1986 Jun;375:153–167. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Siegelbaum S. A., Trautmann A., Koenig J. Single acetylcholine-activated channel currents in developing muscle cells. Dev Biol. 1984 Aug;104(2):366–379. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90092-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sine S. M., Steinbach J. H. Acetylcholine receptor activation by a site-selective ligand: nature of brief open and closed states in BC3H-1 cells. J Physiol. 1986 Jan;370:357–379. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sine S. M., Steinbach J. H. Activation of acetylcholine receptors on clonal mammalian BC3H-1 cells by high concentrations of agonist. J Physiol. 1987 Apr;385:325–359. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sine S. M., Steinbach J. H. Activation of acetylcholine receptors on clonal mammalian BC3H-1 cells by low concentrations of agonist. J Physiol. 1986 Apr;373:129–162. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Takeda K., Trautmann A. A patch-clamp study of the partial agonist actions of tubocurarine on rat myotubes. J Physiol. 1984 Apr;349:353–374. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vicini S., Schuetze S. M. Gating properties of acetylcholine receptors at developing rat endplates. J Neurosci. 1985 Aug;5(8):2212–2224. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-08-02212.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yeramian E., Trautmann A., Claverie P. Acetylcholine receptors are not functionally independent. Biophys J. 1986 Aug;50(2):253–263. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83459-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES