Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1988 Feb;396:563–580. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp016978

Somatosensory projections to the superior colliculus of the anaesthetized cat.

V C Abrahams 1, R J Clinton 1, D Downey 1
PMCID: PMC1192061  PMID: 3411505

Abstract

1. Experiments in anaesthetized cats have shown that the superior colliculus receives deep afferent input from the forelimb and hindlimb, but not from the large superficial neck muscles. 2. Neuronal activity in the superior colliculus is readily elicited by electrical stimulation of C2 and C3 cutaneous nerves. A significant proportion of neurones so activated have multiple receptive fields and some with no identifiable receptive fields in regions innervated by C2 and C3 nerves have receptive fields elsewhere on the body surface. Many collicular neurones activated by C2 and C3 stimulation had no identifiable receptive fields. 3. Natural stimuli to the limbs, hitherto believed to activate only cutaneous receptors, are sufficient to activate deep receptors which contribute to the neuronal responses in the superior colliculus elicited by the natural stimulus. These same natural stimuli set up transmitted vibration adequate to excite receptors some distance from the applied stimulus. 4. No evidence was found for a rigorous somatotopy in the superior colliculus. The great majority of neurones received trigeminal input which is widely distributed throughout the superior colliculus. 5. Tactile stimuli to the face are most effective in eliciting unit activity in the superior colliculus and many neurones activated by these stimuli were shown to be tectospinal neurones. In particular, the specialized receptors of the face, including the glabrous skin of the snout (the planum nasale) and the vibrissae, are major sources of input to collicular neurones including tectospinal neurones. 6. It is suggested that a major role of the superior colliculus is in the organization of head movements associated with the use of the specialized receptor organs of the face in exploratory behaviours. The superior colliculus may also be involved in the organization of aversion movements of the head.

Full text

PDF
563

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abrahams V. C., Anstee G., Richmond F. J., Rose P. K. Neck muscle and trigeminal input to the upper cervical cord and lower medulla of the cat. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1979 Jun;57(6):642–651. doi: 10.1139/y79-098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrahams V. C., Hodgins M., Downey D. Morphology, distribution, and density of sensory receptors in the glabrous skin of the cat rhinarium. J Morphol. 1987 Feb;191(2):109–114. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051910202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abrahams V. C., Lynn B., Richmond F. J. Organization and sensory properties of small myelinated fibres in the dorsal cervical rami of the cat. J Physiol. 1984 Feb;347:177–187. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abrahams V. C., Rose P. K. Projections of extraocular, neck muscle, and retinal afferents to superior colliculus in the cat: their connections to cells of origin of tectospinal tract. J Neurophysiol. 1975 Jan;38(1):10–18. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Abrahams V. C., Rose P. K. The spinal course and distribution of fore and hind limb muscle afferent projections to the superior colliculus of the cat. J Physiol. 1975 May;247(1):117–130. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Abrahams V. C., Turner C. J. The nature of afferents from the large dorsal neck muscles that project to the superior colliculus in the cat. J Physiol. 1981;319:393–401. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson M. E., Yoshida M., Wilson V. J. Tectal and tegmental influences on cat forelimb and hindlimb motoneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1972 Jul;35(4):462–470. doi: 10.1152/jn.1972.35.4.462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clemo H. R., Stein B. E. Effects of cooling somatosensory cortex on response properties of tactile cells in the superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 1986 Jun;55(6):1352–1368. doi: 10.1152/jn.1986.55.6.1352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coulter J. D., Bowker R. M., Wise S. P., Murray E. A., Castiglioni A. J., Westlund K. N. Cortical, tectal and medullary descending pathways to the cervical spinal cord. Prog Brain Res. 1979;50:263–279. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60827-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Danielsson I., Norrsell U. Somatosensory units in the cat's intercollicular region. Acta Physiol Scand. 1986 Dec;128(4):579–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1986.tb08015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gordon B. Receptive fields in deep layers of cat superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Mar;36(2):157–178. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.2.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gottschaldt K. M., Iggo A., Young D. W. Functional characteristics of mechanoreceptors in sinus hair follicles of the cat. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(2):287–315. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grantyn A., Grantyn R. Axonal patterns and sites of termination of cat superior colliculus neurons projecting in the tecto-bulbo-spinal tract. Exp Brain Res. 1982;46(2):243–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00237182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HUNT C. C., McINTYRE A. K. Characteristics of responses from receptors from the flexor longus digitorum muscle and the adjoining interosseous region of the cat. J Physiol. 1960 Aug;153:74–87. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harris L. R. The superior colliculus and movements of the head and eyes in cats. J Physiol. 1980 Mar;300:367–391. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jassik-Gerschenfeld D. Somesthetic and visual responses of superior colliculus neurones. Nature. 1965 Nov 27;208(5013):898–900. doi: 10.1038/208898a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. KERR F. W., OLAFSON R. A. Trigeminal and cervical volleys. Convergence on single units in the spinal gray at C-1 and C-2. Arch Neurol. 1961 Aug;5:171–178. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1961.00450140053005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. KLUVER H., BARRERA E. A method for the combined staining of cells and fibers in the nervous system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1953 Oct;12(4):400–403. doi: 10.1097/00005072-195312040-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kerr F. W. Central relationships of trigeminal and cervical primary afferents in the spinal cord and medulla. Brain Res. 1972 Aug 25;43(2):561–572. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90408-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kitchell R. L., Canton D. D., Johnson R. D., Maxwell S. A. Electrophysiologic studies of cutaneous nerves of the forelimb of the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1982 Oct 1;210(4):400–410. doi: 10.1002/cne.902100406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Manni E., Palmieri G., Marini R., Pettorossi V. E. Trigeminal influences on extensor muscles of the neck. Exp Neurol. 1975 May;47(2):330–342. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(75)90261-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Matthews P. B., Stein R. B. The regularity of primary and secondary muscle spindle afferent discharges. J Physiol. 1969 May;202(1):59–82. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meredith M. A., Stein B. E. Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. J Neurophysiol. 1986 Sep;56(3):640–662. doi: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.3.640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Montagna W., Roman N. A., Macpherson E. Comparative study of the innervation of the facila disc of selected mammals. J Invest Dermatol. 1975 Nov;65(5):458–465. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12608197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nagata T., Kruger L. Tactile neurons of the superior colliculus of the cat: input and physiological properties. Brain Res. 1979 Sep 28;174(1):19–37. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90801-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Richmond F. J., Abrahams V. C. Morphology and distribution of muscle spindles in dorsal muscles of the cat neck. J Neurophysiol. 1975 Nov;38(6):1322–1339. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.6.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rose P. K., Abrahams V. C. Tectospinal and tectoreticular cells: their distribution and afferent connections. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1978 Aug;56(4):650–658. doi: 10.1139/y78-103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roucoux A., Guitton D., Crommelinck M. Stimulation of the superior colliculus in the alert cat. II. Eye and head movements evoked when the head is unrestrained. Exp Brain Res. 1980;39(1):75–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00237071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stein B. E., Arigbede M. O. Unimodal and multimodal response properties of neurons in the cat's superior colliculus. Exp Neurol. 1972 Jul;36(1):179–196. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(72)90145-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stein B. E., Magalhães-Castro B., Kruger L. Relationship between visual and tactile representations in cat superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Mar;39(2):401–419. doi: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.2.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES